Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Do Yourself a Favor -- Read a Book
Of course, we all have questions for Sarah Palin:
Does she actually think living across the Bering Strait from Russia constitutes foreign policy expertise? Does she really take the parable of Adam and Eve as literal truth? How, exactly, does one field dress a moose? And why would one want to?
My first question, though, would not be one of those. I'd simply ask which books she wants to ban -- and why.
Yes, there's a list of titles floating around the Internet right now, but it's a fake. It is, however, established fact that our would-be vice president has in the past tried to pull books off library shelves.
The New York Times reports that as a member of the City Council of Wasilla, Alaska, Palin complained to colleagues about a book called Daddy's Roommate, described in promotional material as being ''for and about the children of lesbian and gay parents.'' Laura Chase, who ran Palin's campaign for mayor, explained that the book was harmless and suggested Palin read it.
Chase told The Times that Palin replied she ``didn't need to read that stuff. It was disturbing that someone would be willing to remove a book from the library and she didn't even read it.''
Later, as mayor, Palin reportedly asked the town's librarian three times whether she would agree to remove controversial books from the shelves. Three times, the librarian refused. Palin fired her, but eventually bowed to public pressure and gave the woman her job back.
''I'm still proud of Sarah,'' said Chase, ``but she scares the bejeebers out of me.''
And in that context, it seems apropos that next week is Banned Books Week.
As you doubtless know, that's the week set aside each year by the American Library Association to bring attention to attempts by some of us to regulate what others of us may read. The ALA's Office for Intellectual Freedom reports that it has seen 9,700 ''challenges'' -- a challenge is defined as a formal written request to remove a book from a library because the content offends or is deemed inappropriate -- since 1990. Chillingly, the office suggests that's probably an undercount. It estimates that for every challenge reported, four or five are not.
So Palin has company, to say the least.
Count among that number the woman from a Cuban exile group who bragged to a Miami Herald reporter how in 2006 she checked out and kept an elementary school library book she felt painted too rosy a picture of life on that communist island. Like Palin, she thought she had good reason. Would-be book banners always do.
I'm reminded of how someone challenged me the other day on my contention that anti-intellectualism has overtaken this land. I mentioned by way of example Palin's Bible literalism, but really, there's so much more. There's the ''Jay Walking'' segment on Leno. There's this notion that ''elite'' is a four-letter word. There's the White House's censorship and politicization of science. There's the recent survey which found that more people can name all five Simpsons than all five freedoms enumerated in the First Amendment.
And there's this: as many as 50,000 incidents since 1990 in which a book was forced to justify its existence. We're talking books like The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, books like The Color Purple, books like Harry Potter and, yes, books like Daddy's Roommate, books that offended because they expressed ideas that made someone uncomfortable. As if any other kind of idea was worth expressing.
We are becoming the stupid giant of planet Earth: richer than Midas, mightier than Thor, dumber than rocks. Which makes us a danger to the planet -- and to ourselves. This country cannot continue to prosper and to embrace stupidity. The two are fundamentally incompatible.
So do us all a favor: Annoy Sarah Palin. For goodness sake, read.
- Posted in



30 Comments so far
Show AllAh, gotta love this Idiocracy!
I agree with Mr. Pitts that more Americans should read more books, such as Savage Mules by Dennis Perrin, which describes how Democrats have been over the last sixty years [if not longer] just as bellicose as their Republican counterparts and The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism by Andrew Bacevich which details, among other things, how neoliberals such as Barack Obama have been just as responsible and just as eager to start wars as the neoconservatives.
Thank you Errol for your concise summary of a book, one of many written by this scholar. That your concise summary is a paradigm of American knowledge is stupifying.
Erroll,
Quoting from the book you recommend, "The End of American Exceptionalism" by Andrew Bacevich:
"According to (C. Wright) Mills, the power elite and those trafficking in ideas useful to its core membership share a 'cast of mind that defines international reality as basically military.' ... For members of the power elite, imperfect security is by definition inadequate security. Where gaps exist, they need to be filled. Defenses must be shored up. Yet, ultimately, as the writers James Chace and Caleb Carr once observed, absolute security 'cannot be negotiated; it can only be won.' And winning implies the possession of military might along with a willingness to use it.
"In consonance with this 'military ascendancy,' these American hawks are inclined to see the United States as already beset by actual dangerous threats, with even greater perils lurking just around the corner. With a low tolerance for uncertainty, they are highly tuned to the putative risks of waiting on events, while discounting the hazards posed by precipitate action. ... For his part, Vice President Cheney was ... explicit. Even a remotely suspected threat (that Iraq might have weapons of mass destruction) could provoke a sufficient rationale for action. 'If there's a one percent chance that Pakistani scientists are helping al Qaeda build or develop a nuclear weapon,' Cheney once remarked, 'we have to treat it as a certainty in terms of our response.'
"Perceived threats, even when faint, improbable, or (like that Iraq nuclear program) at worst distant, invariably demand an urgent response, which no less invariably involves enhancing, reconfiguring, deploying, or actually using American coercive power."
This is precisely the mind-set, the "cast of mind" that neither major party candidate is willing to challenge. Obama no more than McCain.
Nader/Gonzalez '08
"There's this notion that ''elite'' is a four-letter word."
Amen. I think it was Bill Hicks who said "Elitist? Of course I'm elitist! Who do you think should be in charge, the stupidest fucking person in the room?"
You made unspoken, unproven assumption big enough to fly a 747 through - that membership in an "elete" coorelates positively with intellgence.
In reality, being an "elite" and being smart coorelate very poorly, even negatively in some cases.
Noun
* S: (n) elite, elite group (a group or class of persons enjoying superior intellectual or social or economic status)
Adjective
* S: (adj) elect, elite (selected as the best) "an elect circle of artists"; "elite colleges"
I am fully aware that we have a cohort of evil bastards of questionable intelligence and morals that currently comprise the "elite ruling class".
In the context of the article, and Bill Hick's humour, we are talking about how it might not be such a good idea to judge someone's leadership potential based on things like "Person I'd most like to have a beer and watch the football game with".
Of course, Bill Hicks, being a comedian, appreciates how explaining the crap out of everything you are trying to say tends to drain the humour out of it.
Well, let's quantify a little bit with no rancor:
'elete,' 'coorelates,' 'intellgence,'and a repeat, singular, of 'coorelate.'The logical fallacies?
"...unspoken, unproven assumption big enough to fly a 747 through..." This is commonly known as hyperbole to reduce a thesis made by the author of the main article where intelligence and it's application were being projected as elitist through the mass media as a demeaning, derogatory term. You continued, "..."elete" coorelates positively with intellgence." There is no substantiation on your part, nor do you seem to want to incriminate 'wealth' as elitism.
Your final word, "In reality...", with a bit of common humor "...being an "elite" and being smart coorelate very poorly, even negatively in some cases." This tidbit of vernacular diction is an attitude in itself borrowed from, "He's a college boy."
If I have misinterpreted your meaning, it may be because there is no articulation on your part just what the fuck you mean to say, given your spelling and non-logic.
What gets lost in the shuffle are voices that articulate how we rationalize exclusionary and hierarchic power structures that are increasingly undeniably broken and always have been.
One of the best yardsticks is to consider delving into what is most marginalized, without prepresentation and you'll find what constitutes the "profit margin". Noam Chomsky:
Viewpoints: Where now for capitalism?
Noam Chomsky
BBC News, September 19, 2008
Markets have inherent and well-known inefficiencies. One factor is failure to calculate the costs to those who do not participate in transactions. These "externalities" can be huge. That is particularly true for financial institutions.
Their task is to take risks, calculating potential costs for themselves. But they do not take into account the consequences of their losses for the economy as a whole.
Hence the financial market "underprices risk" and is "systematically inefficient," as John Eatwell and Lance Taylor wrote a decade ago, warning of the extreme dangers of financial liberalization and reviewing the substantial costs already incurred - and also proposing solutions, which have been ignored.
The threat became more severe when the Clinton administration repealed the Glass-Steagall act of 1933, thus freeing financial institutions "to innovate in the new economy," in Clinton's words -- and also "to self-destruct, taking down with them the general economy and international confidence in the US banking system," financial analyst Nomi Prins adds.
The unprecedented intervention of the Fed may be justified or not in narrow terms, but it reveals, once again, the profoundly undemocratic character of state capitalist institutions, designed in large measure to socialise cost and risk and privatize profit, without a public voice.
That is, of course, not limited to financial markets. The advanced economy as a whole relies heavily on the dynamic state sector, with much the same consequences with regard to risk, cost, profit, and decisions, crucial features of the economy and political system.
http://www.chomsky.info/articles/20080919.htm
Only elitists read books! Everything worth knowing was leared in kindergarten!
Obviously spelling wasn't on the agenda!!! :-)
True that. Let's kill the TV and radio at least since at least on the Internet you can read.
Sioux Rose
Since time circles with the earth, sun and moon, the same ones seeking to ban books now were likely cloaked in other mortal flesh costumes when the nazis burned books, and the Library of Alexandria got sacked. Somehow these imbeciles believe that if they limit access to knowledge, they can lockdown all minds to their own level and FREEZE progress. These conservatives think they can conserve the past and stop the flow of evolution of our very souls!
We are becoming the stupid giant of planet Earth: richer than Midas, mightier than Thor, dumber than rocks.
I read somewhere that the American politician is in terms of DNA base pairs almost four times more complex than a baked potato.
Time is linear, unless a very large black hole has caught it.
Read a book or memorize one for future generations - if there are any.
The Sunday Times has revealed that an Israeli factory beneath the Negev desert is manufacturing thermo-nuclear weapons for atomic bombs.
The secrets of the subterranean factory have been uncovered by The Sunday Times Insight team.
Hidden beneath the Negev desert, the factory has been producing atomic warheads for the past 20 years. Now it has almost certainly begun manufacturing thermo-nuclear weapons, with yields big enough to destroy entire cities, the report says.
Information about Israel's capacity to manufacture the bomb comes from the testimony of a former Dimona employee, nuclear technician Mordechai Vanunu.
Vanunu's testimony and pictures, confirm that Israel has the world's sixth-largest stockpile of nuclear weapons, including hundreds of nuclear warheads.
Israel has possessed its secret weapons factory for more than two decades, and its nuclear facility is equipped with French plutonium extracting technology, which transformed Dimona from a research establishment to a bomb production facility.
The nuclear scientists consulted by The Sunday Times calculate that at least 100 and as many as 200 nuclear weapons of varying destructive power have been assembled - 10 times the previously estimated strength of Israel's nuclear arsenal.
The scientists include Theodore Taylor, who was taught by Robert Oppenheimer, the father of the atomic bomb, and who went on to head the Pentagon's atomic weapons test program.
Taylor studied the photographs taken by Vanunu inside Dimona and a transcript of his evidence near Washington last week.
"There should no longer be any doubt that Israel is, and for at least a decade has been, a fully-fledged nuclear weapons state. The Israeli nuclear weapons program is considerably more advanced than indicated by any previous report or conjectures of which I am aware," Taylor said.
Taylor's assessments have been confirmed by other top nuclear scientists who were shown the pictures and evidence provided by Vanunu.
MSH/WY
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=70201§ionid=351020202
That's actually a story in the Times archive from 1986. The presstv link originates in some kind of on-this-date-in-history replay.
The current story is at
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article4794714.ece
with the original dateline October 5, 1986.
Old news, but scary anyway.
Jacob Freeze
And as to it's relevance to this article?
"This country cannot continue to prosper and to embrace stupidity."
Sadly, Americans have apparently chosen to cease prospering and get stupider.
Now shut up and pass me that Big Mac and that copy of "People"...
We were forced into it by the 'Patriot Act' and Pelosi taking impeachment off my dining room table gathering of anarchists who were getting drunk and spouting Ezra Pound while on the telephone to the First Lady. They would have hung up, but were getting off on her giggle. She kept saying, "The Chimp never talks like that to me!!"
"So do us all a favor: Annoy Sarah Palin. For goodness sake, read."
Palin has no problem with moose-lovers reading. I am sure she is absolutely committed to ensuring that all American schoolchildren will read such "classic" American authors as Ayn Rand and Tim LaHaye and Danielle Steele.
And nothing else.
What about,
"The Zen of Moose Skinning for Alaskan Greenhorns,"?
Gotta love stupidity. Can you list for us ONE book Palin banned? Just one?
Right, she is an 'unsuccessful' book banner. Even more reason to call bullshit on her qualifications. Can't even ban a book in a small town. Loser.
Thanks TruhinessTeller for focusing the debate.
This is not worth responding to.
your autobiography.
"Can you list for us ONE book Palin banned? Just one?"
So she tried and failed?
Not exactly confidence-inspiring, whatever your political persuasion.
The following quotes from books that would be banned by the corporate elite and its minions like Palin. Vote third party, vote for real change. Nader or Green Party.
War creates peace like hate creates love. ~David L. Wilson
That we are to stand by the president, right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. ~Theodore Roosevelt
It’s difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it. Sinclair Lewis
The Roots of Violence: Wealth without work, Pleasure without conscience, Knowledge without character, Commerce without morality, Science without humanity, Worship without sacrifice, Politics without principles ~ Mahatma Gandhi
All murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. – Voltaire
Fanaticism consists of redoubling your effort when you have forgotten your aim. ~ George Santayana
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” — John F. Kennedy
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt." ~ Bertrand Russell
www.NotOneMore.US
The book of common quotes of great thinkers used by people who have no clue but want to appear to be smart, but end up looking stupid.
Ban that book!!:)
pedropratt September 23rd, 2008 12:35 am
Argh!
Beat me to it.
Thanks.