SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
republican party
Big Oil's $445 Million Investment in Trump and GOP 'Already Paying Off'
"Donald Trump's Day 1 actions have shown where his loyalties lie—executing the industry's wishlist at the expense of working Americans," said one climate campaigner.
Jan 23, 2025
A report released earlier this week estimates that fossil fuel industry interests spent nearly $450 million during the 2024 election cycle on campaign donations, lobbying, and other efforts to bolster U.S. President Donald Trump, his Republican allies, and policies that benefit oil and gas corporations.
That investment "is already paying off," said Alex Witt, senior adviser for oil and gas at Climate Power, the advocacy group behind the new analysis.
According to the report, Big Oil's total known spending in the last election cycle amounted to "an astounding $445 million."
"Importantly, however, the oil and gas industry also routes undisclosed funds through dark money groups that do not have to reveal their donors, making it nearly impossible to understand the full scope of their impact," the report notes.
"Trump's energy agenda will raise costs for families, strip away energy choices, dirty our air and water, and put 400,000 new clean energy jobs at risk."
Climate Power found that $96 million of the $445 million in total spending was "direct donations" to Trump's presidential campaign, which openly solicited fossil fuel industry cash. Fossil fuel interests also spent close to $80 million on advertising in support of Trump and the GOP, more than $25 million backing down-ballot Republican candidates, and $243 million lobbying the U.S. Congress, according to the new analysis.
The latter investment is "likely to pay dividends when the Senate votes on Trump's Cabinet appointments and as budget and legislative priorities are set," the report states.
"'Energy Czar' and Department of the Interior nominee Doug Burgum helped Donald Trump deepen his oil and gas donor Rolodex," the report adds. "Trump named fracking evangelist and fossil fuel company CEO Chris Wright to lead the Department of Energy and Lee Zeldin, who accepted more than $400,000 in Big Oil campaign contributions, to lead the Environmental Protection Agency."
Soon after taking office earlier this week, Trump declared a "national energy emergency" as part of his sweeping effort to ramp up fossil fuel production, which was already at record levels under the Biden administration. Trump also withdrew the U.S. from the Paris climate accord and moved to unleash drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a step that one environmental group condemned as a "giveaway to Big Oil CEOs."
"Donald Trump's Day 1 actions have shown where his loyalties lie—executing the industry's wishlist at the expense of working Americans," Witt said Wednesday. "Trump's energy agenda will raise costs for families, strip away energy choices, dirty our air and water, and put 400,000 new clean energy jobs at risk."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Senate Dems Block 'Deliberately Misleading' GOP Bill Attacking Reproductive Care
"This bill is the very definition of pernicious: It attacks women's healthcare using false narratives and outright fearmongering," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.
Jan 22, 2025
U.S. Senate Democrats on Wednesday blocked from a final vote a Republican bill that, according to Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, made clear that under newly sworn-in President Donald Trump, "it will be a golden age, but for the extreme, anti-choice movement."
"This bill is the very definition of pernicious: It attacks women's healthcare using false narratives and outright fearmongering, and adds more legal risk for doctors on something that is already illegal," Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on the chamber's floor before senators voted 52-47 along party lines, short of the 60 votes needed to advance the so-called Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (S. 6) to a final vote.
Introduced by Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), S. 6 would "prohibit a healthcare practitioner from failing to exercise the proper degree of care in the case of a child who survives an abortion or attempted abortion," under the threat of fines and up to five years in prison. Healthcare professionals and rights advocates have condemned the legislation as deeply misleading.
"So much of the hard-right's anti-choice agenda is pushed, frankly, by people who have little to no understanding of what women go through when they are pregnant," said Schumer. "The scenario targeted by this bill is one of the most heartbreaking moments that a woman could ever encounter, the agonizing choice of having to end care when serious and rare complications arise in pregnancy. And at that moment of agony, this bill cruelly substitutes the judgment of qualified medical professionals, and the wishes of millions of families, and allows ultraright ideology to dictate what they do."
After honoring Cecile Richards, a longtime Planned Parenthood leader who died earlier this week, Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said Wednesday that "of all the bills that we could be voting on—lowering the cost of healthcare, expanding childcare, helping our families—it's an absolute disgrace that Republicans are spending their first week in power attacking women, criminalizing doctors, and lying about abortion."
"This isn't how abortion works; Republicans know it," stressed Murray, a senior member and former chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. "All babies are already protected under the law, regardless of the circumstance of their birth. Doctors already have a legal obligation to provide appropriate medical care. And we already know this sham bill from Republicans is not going anywhere."
"Last time we voted down this bill, I actually spoke about something Republicans refuse to acknowledge in this debate: the struggles, the struggles of a pregnant woman, who has received tragic news that her baby had a fatal medical condition and would not be able to survive, and who were able to make the choice that was right for their family," she noted. "But now, here we are, already hearing stories of women who were denied that choice by extreme Republican abortion bans."
Wednesday's vote fell on the 52nd anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that affirmed abortion rights nationwide—until it was reversed by right-wing justices in 2022, with the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organizationdecision, which provoked a fresh wave of state-level restrictions on reproductive freedom.
"It's no accident that congressional Republicans used the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, a watershed case for liberty, equality, and bodily autonomy, to vote on a bill that perpetuates myths about abortion care, shames the people who seek that care, and vilifies those who provide it," said Fatima Goss Graves, president and CEO of the National Women's Law Center, in a statement.
"A majority of the electorate continues to support abortion rights and access," she noted. "Americans have seen the results of the Supreme Court's unjust and callous decision to overturn Roe v. Wade—from abortion bans forcing people to travel across state lines to access the care they need to pregnant people being denied care and even dying to an exodus of doctors that is exacerbating the existing maternal health crisis we face—and they reject restrictive abortion policies. That's why anti-abortion advocates must rely on disinformation like this bill to further their extreme agenda."
Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, also highlighted the country's sweeping healthcare crisis in her Wednesday statement about Republicans' failed bill.
"This bill is deliberately misleading and offensive to pregnant people, and the doctors and nurses who provide their care," she said. "At a time when we are facing a national abortion access crisis, lawmakers should be focused on how to bring more care to the communities they serve, not spending their time spreading misinformation, criminalizing doctors, and inserting themselves further into medical decisions made by healthcare professionals."
"This bill is not based in any reality of how medical care works," she added, "and it's wrong, irresponsible, and dangerous to suggest otherwise."
As the GOP works to restrict reproductive rights, advocacy groups are determined to fight back. All* Above All marked the Roe anniversary by releasing an Abortion Justice Playbook that the organization's president, Nourbese Flint, said "is our blueprint for a future where abortion access is equitable, universal, and free from discrimination."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Targeting Vulnerable Republicans, Campaign Demands 'Hands Off Medicaid' in Spending Cut Talks
"What we're focused on are those members who come from states with large Medicaid populations, and who should have the guts to stand up for their constituents," said the founder of Protect Our Care.
Jan 21, 2025
With President Donald Trump in the White House and Republicans controlling both chambers of Congress, the GOP is examining numerous ways to offset the revenue loss that's expected from the proposed extension of the 2017 tax cuts—a decision that's expected to cost more than $4 trillion, with wealthy individuals and businesses benefiting the most.
But the advocacy group Protect Our Care, which was founded in 2017 as the first Trump administration faced intense backlash against its effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA), is now working to ensure that Medicaid cuts are left out of upcoming budget reconciliation talks—and that Republicans who support such cuts face consequences in upcoming elections.
The group on Tuesday launched a $10 million campaign titled "Hands Off Medicaid," with TV and digital ads running nationwide, particularly in states with high numbers of Medicaid enrollees and Republican lawmakers whom Protect Our Care believes could be pressured to defend the program.
"What we're focused on are those members who come from states with large Medicaid populations, and who should have the guts to stand up for their constituents," Leslie Dach, founder of Protect Our Care, told The Washington Post. "This is a campaign designed to stop these cuts from happening in reconciliation."
While the ads will be seen across the nation, reminding lawmakers that 79 million Americans are covered under the healthcare program for low-income people, children, and patients with disabilities, the Republicans who are being particularly targeted include Sens. Bill Cassidy (La.), Susan Collins (Maine), Thom Tillis (N.C.), and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), and Reps. Michael Lawler (N.Y.), Ryan Mackenzie (Pa.), and David Schweikert (Ariz.).
In addition to launching an ad blitz, Protect Our Care is organizing the writing of op-eds and letters to the editor placed by experts, healthcare professionals, and people who rely on Medicaid; grassroots lobbying and meetings with lawmakers; and in-person and virtual events in key states and districts.
While the group shares the stories of people covered by Medicaid, including more than 31 million children, Republicans have been perusing a "menu" of more than $5 trillion in potential spending cuts, including an estimated $2.3 trillion from the healthcare program.
Republicans are considering changes to the program's payment structure that would fund Medicaid based on state population; reintroducing work requirements, which Trump greenlit during his first term; and lowering the rate of federal payments for Medicaid beneficiaries who are covered under the ACA's expansion of the program.
On Monday night, hours after his inauguration, Trump rescinded an executive order signed by former President Joe Biden that made it harder to impose work requirements for Medicaid enrollees.
The advocacy group Social Security Works pointed out ahead of Trump's inauguration that "every member of the U.S. House is on the ballot in two years."
"If they try to cut ONE PENNY from Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid, we will make sure that they lose their jobs," said the group.
More than 300 organizations signed a letter earlier this month, as members of Congress were sworn in, warning them that cutting Medicaid "would betray your constituents of all political affiliations who are seeking more economic security, not less."
Dach noted on Tuesday that Republicans are eyeing cuts to social spending after an election in which the party "claimed to care about working people and the cost of living."
"Nothing could be more outrageous than ripping away healthcare from millions of seniors, children, moms, and workers to pay for another round of tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires," said Dach. "The American people didn't vote in November to have their grandparents kicked out of nursing homes or healthcare ripped away from kids with disabilities or expectant moms in order to give [billionaire Trump backer] Elon Musk another tax cut."
"We know firsthand from the campaign to defeat [the] ACA repeal eight years ago, and every healthcare fight since, that healthcare is a top-of-mind issue for Americans—and they want lawmakers to do more to ensure affordable access to coverage, not less," Dach added. "Our 'Hands off Medicaid' campaign will make that abundantly clear and demand that Medicaid cuts are off the table—for good."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular