EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
You Don’t Need a Clock to Know What Time It Is
With each passing day, the news grows increasingly grim. In recent weeks alone, we’ve seen women’s rights under assault as reactionary forces seek to turn the clock back by decades. Half a world away in Afghanistan, corpses are defiled and more are brutally created, without even their ages or innocence sufficient to protect them. Meanwhile, back at home, Congress passes and President Obama signs a new law that further restricts the ability of “we the people” to say or do anything that might stem the tide of the insanity. It’s all such a familiar tune, one that plays out with flawless precision in nearly every turn of the news cycle.
Meanwhile, the blogosphere buzzes along, chronicling the morass and the madness with vigor. The headlines read like an excruciating autopsy of democracy and justice in the late, great United States — and a horrifying blueprint for how to decimate that portion of the planet’s inhabitants who have the misfortune of living atop, amid, or around something that we covet. Naked fascism here and wanton destruction there, with each solidifying the other in our hearts and minds as the gears of consumer culture blithely grind about their business with clocklike precision. Tick: the Dow Jones goes up! Tock: another celebrity melts down! And hardly anyone seems to really know what time it is…
Or maybe everyone does, at least on some level, with a great many simply choosing to ignore the alarm bells in favor of the bells and whistles on their latest consumer gadget. The rising tide (both literal and figurative) that threatens to consume us all is best confronted by ignoring it. The blood on one’s hands comes right off with the newest antibacterial, sanitizing, scented concoction. The news may be forbidding, but it’s merely a minor inconvenience since there are so many creature comforts expressly not forbidden. Tales of disease, despair, and destruction are little more than reality noir stories told to occasionally add a touch of macabre and cinéma vérité to one’s halcyon Netflix queue.
Swipe across that touchscreen, scroll down with that mouse, click that ad banner, pull that lever in the booth, change that channel repeatedly, post a link to that viral video, accept that new credit card offer, text while in that drive-through line, gas up the car and eat up from the microwave. Modern life is a veritable hall of mirrors for narcissists, complete with the rush of affirmation from every “like” attained and text message received with a sonorous chime. It’s all so smooth and slick and seamless, how we’ve gone in less than one generation from people having time to ones being had by it. Yes, you can buy time, share it on vacation, put it on a sheet at work, use it for making a bomb, or turn it into an uncritical magazine — but at the end of the day, there is no longer an end of the day.
We are on the clock, all the time, everywhere we go. The line between work and play has blurred to such an extent that there’s a likely gym at your office and (if there’s not) people are closing deals on handheld devices while at the gym, giving new meaning to the notion of “working out.” Even on social calls one can hear the faint “tap tap” of keystrokes in the background, as an overworked friend multitasks while you’re busy baring your soul between your own multiple, endless tasks. It’s all just so routinely riveting, so crassly compelling, so miraculously mundane, so five minutes ago. Forever a step behind, never quite catching up, no bottom to that inbox, no time to stop and think.
Yet it’s strangely comfortable, after all, ceaselessly cascading from one inconsequential calamity to the next. Can we keep this up, culturally or individually? It’s a new survival-of-the-fittest motif: those who are more cognitively dissonant and functionally distracted will succeed in this brave new world, while those with slower chronometers, active consciences, or stop-and-smell-the-roses ethics are consigned to the breakdown lane on the information superhighway. The fortunate ones whizzing by at 4G (or more) might be tempted into rubbernecking as the broken-down vehicles pile up on the side, but they’re probably too busy texting while driving to notice.
And so it goes. Nero may have fiddled while Rome burned, but we’ve got him beat by a micro-processed mile. The apocalypse is already being televised, routinized, digitized. It’s not coming; it already came and went, and hardly anyone even looked up to take notice. The world ended not with a whimper but a tweet: #IMoverIT. Heck, there’s not even time for punctuation anymore, unless it’s part of an emoticon. theres prolly no need 4 an ! aftr yr doomsday anyway LOL :>)
Seriously? It’s like everyone is pushing toward the bow of the Titanic to snap a photo of that massive iceberg up ahead with their cellphone cameras. Yeah, post that iceberg to your profile, and caption it something ironic like: “Super chunk of ice, way cool!” No matter that the Doomsday Clock stands at five minutes to midnight — that’s an eternity when things move at the speed of micro-circuitry. It’s all an abstraction anyway, a live-action film version of reality; even war is played with joysticks like a cutting-edge video game. There’s no there there anymore; it’s all right here in the palm of your hand. Hickory dickory dock, just mouse over the clock icon for a free music download!
Hey, I love science fiction as much as anyone, and I’m not averse to technology altogether. But technology should be a tool for us to use, not the other way around. Let’s face it: we’re losing the texture of reality, and not even the blatant brutality of ongoing genocide, ethnocide, and ecocide is able to shake us free from our self-imposed slumber at this point in time. Is it too late, in any event? I think not — but the day is dawning and time is running out. We can still correct our course, by learning to use technology for liberatory rather than repressive ends, and by striving to decouple our actual selves from our virtual selves more and more each day. Go on a digital diet, and stick to it.
Ultimately, this move by itself still won’t turn the tide, but at least it puts us back in the mix. The impetus of “forced obsolescence” is a contrivance of the power-mad in our midst, yet we need not stand idly by while their actuaries place us in the “liabilities” column. Come on folks, Christmas morning is over and we need to clean up the living room and put the toys away for a while. Read a book, take a walk, tell a story, share a home-cooked meal, converse with friends and family — anything but the incessant, obsessive, stupefying machinations of the virtual veil. The clock is ticking, the hour is late, the alarm is sounding, and it’s time to wake up and meet the world anew.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


29 Comments so far
Show AllThank You.
i just like good music
I am not dating myself - I believe this is appropriate.
And No, I am not black
follow link to cool tune.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqWbaAui3Bo
And now even truth must present itself as a profound and circular irony. That's what time it really is.
Great "post".
What struck me about the article is that it mirrors the posts of our hopi poster, Shadow Dancer. If you took one of the posts from Shadow Dancer and embellished it a lot, you might end up with this article like this.
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so." - Ford Prefect, ' The Hitch-hikers Guide to the Galaxy'.
When I want a break,
for sanity's sake,
I go and work in my garden.
But don't forget your towel (this can be understood by Hitchhiker fans).
The late, great author of the four volume "Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy trilogy", Douglas Adams, had much to teach us about the nature of reality.
For example, after the giant computer, Deep Thought, spent eons trying to answer the question, "What is the meaning of life the universe and everything" , it came up with the answer, "54" - and maybe the computer was almost right.
The Answer, to Life, The Universe, and Everything was '42'.
The Question to the Answer of Life, the Universe and Everything was "What do you get when you multiply six times eight?"
When Ford and Arthur discovered this, Arthur commented "I always thought there was something fundamentally wrong with the Universe."
Perhaps what we should do is force the one percenters to emulate Zaphod Beeblebrox if they want tax shelters... He that was spending the year dead for tax purposes. If they don't make it back, too bad.
Is it time to Panic! yet? And don't forget your towel.
How wonderful to find this truthful portrayal of what life is like in today's world of technology. I was just lamenting yesterday to a fellow animal rescue comrade, face to face I might add, that no one seems to have time to talk anymore, or even more surprising, regarding customer service, there is no longer "customer service".
In today's gadget world it's relatively easy to assume "you're the one" with the problem since everyone else seems oblivious to it. Of course "everyone else" is who is on the iPhone, iPod, cell phone or whatever the electronic screen happens to be; and that “everyone else” is rarely, if ever, making direct eye contact or listening fully to what you’re saying.
I remember a time when a friend would call on the now defunct land line and we'd strike up a conversation, impromptu, that lasted minutes and sometimes well into an hour. There is no such thing any longer. It seems I now have to make an appointment or set aside a pre-arranged official time to talk to people that once were not so burdened by all these commitments. I had one friend tell me a while back he thinks about calling quite often but due to the length of time our conversations often endure, he simply can't do that anymore.
Am I missing something? Wasn't there a time when catching up with an old friend actually meant "catching up", meaning the conversation spanned topics that included laughter, sometimes sorrow, maybe a little haughty gossip and very often commiseration about one thing or another? This is why I devote my life to animals; they live in the moment. Every memorable observation or snapshot I have of some extraordinary nature scene happens when I’m walking my dog or taking a hike. There is no electronic gadget anywhere near either of those scenes.
Once I observed a flock of Common Egrets flying east in the morning as the sun was rising turning the egret’s plumage the brilliant rose color of the sunrise. Excited and surprised, I looked around to see if anyone else was there to share in the wonder; all I could see were the neon blue lights flashing from inside a house because the television was on. I’m talking about 6 am in the morning.
Here's my question: how can we hope to heal an imperiled planet when everyone is staring at an electronic screen?
having completely abdicated any personal involvement in our own sustenance beyond purchase as part and parcel of living on stolen land violently kept, we no longer have any responsibility other than continual solvency, so no better use of time, once solvent, than 'occupation'...
the mind, loving only the mind, sees the body, the planet, as superfluous, though it isn't...
the delicate cage holding the body, that of physical space-time and the living world, is argued beyond existence, though it still exists, even as it suffers our ignorance...
this is our immediate peril, our denial of physical realities in favor of electronic ones...
following this reasoning, the path emerges: reclaim stolen lands, cease working and buying, cease living electronically, and do so en masse...
I suggest September 22, 2012...
In a similar vein as RIO+20 is on the horizon, there is an interesting blog post about how we conceive of work and how it relates to the commodification and plundering of the planet - the idols of environmentalism and the ecology of work. Controversial - but definitely thought provoking
http://wrongkindofgreen.org/2012/01/17/flashback-the-idols-of-environmentalism-the-ecology-of-work/
"Once I observed a flock of Common Egrets flying east in the morning as the sun was rising turning the egret’s plumage the brilliant rose color of the sunrise."
Once, in a parking lot, I got out of my car after a storm and saw a double rainbow. The only time I have ever seen one. I looked around to point it out to others, but the only other people around were three teen-age girls in a car, listening to the radio. I didn't bother to bother them.
"Here's my question: how can we hope to heal an imperiled planet when everyone is staring at an electronic screen?"
I don't know - I'm looking at a screen to read the question... ;-) Pretty paradoxical. What I most want to do is walk out into the forest with some close friends and talk about the great Mystery of being alive - a Mystery that's so great that no amount of talk diminishes it. "Life is what happens to us while we're busy making sense of it..."
But these days, very few friends are available for that kind of simple living - they're either to busy with their important lives, or too drugged out, psychologically wrecked out, attention-span distracted, to understand the value of feeling the sensations of only being alive. So I go alone, which feels good, but strange. But sometimes a friend or two come along, and it's great again. - Sharing the experience of being alive, is what being alive is all about.
Can you feel the evil
Can you hear the wail
The sound of destiny sharpening its nails
The scent of corruption from a race called Man
The Beast now declares it's time to bloody the land
Beware, the sloth
Can you hear the war
Can you feel the plague
As it slowly moves along the path you've made
Now it's right behind you
You can run no more
It's time to pay the piper
Time to settle the score
Beware, the sloth
Realize you're the mother
Of this demon you face
You have given birth to the end of our race
You look for someone to blame
Only the dead are around
The Beast, he knows you by name
And in his wrath you'll go down
Beware, the sloth
Saint Vitus, Sloth
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAv-EDNg1D4
Like!
Oh, wait ...
Kill your television
Randall: Thank you for an insightful article.
I love the description on your resume. I think it is a gift to be teaching students seeking a heightened voice for themselves and humanity. And probably the irony goes without saying - the ones enrolled in your program of Peace Studies have probably already found what they are searching, while the ones that would benefit are nowhere to be found.
I found your analysis of our current state of techno-overdose pretty accurate, that which was to liberate us, as in fact ensnared us into becoming a society of garbage collectors – too distracted from pertinent matters, yet always ready to shout “do it to Julia” as long as there was no repercussions to ourselves.
I’m reminded of this by a short story by Lars Eighner – On Dumpster Diving, an account of the Author’s three years experience living on the refuse or waste of others. Reading the story, one never feels he is made to emphasize with the plight of the author’s fall from grace, but the reader is drawn to a deeper appreciation for an [Art] most would dismiss as unfortunate circumstances. He concludes: “Anyway, I find my desire to grab for the gaudy bauble has been largely sated. I think this is an attitude I share with the very wealthy – we both know there is plenty more where what we have came from. Between us are the rat-race millions who have confounded their selves with the objects they grasp and who nightly scavenge the cable channels looking for they know not what.
I am sorry for them.” By the end he has earned your respect.
Searching for garbage in the land of plenty is so condescendingly sneered at when the vision is in three dimensional form yet warmly embraced as that of a baby’s breath when it enters into the first person's own cultural domain through an indirect medium.
Michel Foucoult: "There is no binary division to be made between what one says and what one doesn't say; we must try to determine the different ways of not saying things"
One’s experience becomes the communicative [truth] that is the personal [real] regardless of this or that theory - much like telling time.
Over 69 Countries along with our natives and indigenous people the world over have known this to be true way before we stopped counting time by mechanical means.
Let's for-go the patent on humility and distribute it freely.
"It's like everyone is pushing towards the bow of the Titanic to snap a photo of that massive iceberg up ahead on their cell phone cameras...... No matter that the Doomsday Clock stands at five minutes to midnight - that's an eternity when things move at the speed of micro-circuitry. It's all an abstraction anyway, a live action film version of reality; even war is played with joysticks like a cutting-edge video game." -Randall Amster
There is of course considerable irony in taking this wonderfully composed essay urging us all to go on a digital diet via the medium of Common Dreams. Regardless, very nice work, professor Amster.
Before the invention of the first mechanical clocks, European communities (like most cultures, according to anthropologists) collectively kept track of time by gazing at the skies, and observing the change of the seasons. Often, special priests or priestesses were specifically tasked to keep track of what time it was, so that communal holiday festivals would be coordinated to recur annually, biannually, quarterly, or whatever. Before clocks existed, a day simply commenced when the sun came up, and ended when it went back down. Cross-culturally, the division of a waking period unit of time was often marked by calls for public prayer rituals, with sometimes a special day set aside for common feasting, market activity, or purely religious celebration.
The invention of the first reliable mechanical twelve hour clock appeared in Europe somewhere between 1200 and 1300 I believe. Major cities - Paris, Rome, London, Padua - often in the central cathedral, boasted the highest of high technology dedicated to reliably telling all - believer and nonbeliever alike - what time it was as, each went about their daily tasks and toil. That's the legacy of why church bells still sound on land, and bells still often declare the communal passage of time on ships at sea.
A very coherent argument has been made that it was the ability to artificially construct from the abstract a commonly accepted recurrent rhythm that divided a day into hours, a work week into days, months into weeks, and years into months which enabled rural agrarian societies to grandually transform into more urbanized and organized industrial, commercial, wage-for-unit-of-labor societies. A common time clock, and use of common currency for currency based upon credit, emerged in roughly the same historical era. The landlord and the cash tenant, the lender and the borrower, the boss and the hourly employee wage slave, each had a deeply personal stake in being able to figure out exactly what time it was. How else to define what was fair, what was on time with how much accrued interest, or what contract debt was overdue?
"Yes you can buy time, share it on vacation, put it on a sheet at work, use it for making a bomb, or turn it into an uncritical magazine...... We are all on the clock, all the time, wherever we go...... And so it goes. Nero may have fiddled while Rome burned, but we've got him beat by a microprocessed mile."
Thanks for your thoughts, Randall Amster. Maybe what we're talking about is a process which commenced in Medieval Europe, in which human lives have interfaced with time technology for so many years that the machines have finally triumphed completely.
Bill from Saginaw
You left the moon out... "many moons ago." The dance between the sun and Moon has served as the reliable celestial clock for eons. And you boys wonder why I harp on sexism... to only notice the sun and leave out Luna's profound role on life cycles is another way to make the Divine SHE invisible. The omission so unconscious in men as to not be noticed at all.
This is a marvelous essay. I've often felt this generation's acute intimacy with things electronic, their eager energetic arcs into virtual reality, is to desensitize them to the profound loss of all things Natural/World. Since most are already aborted from it cognitively, they will not implode at the realization of that which will come never again. Like Blake, they will have to reside in the realm of imagination where the whole (denuded) world can be beheld in a drop of sand or clay.
Bill did not "leave out the moon" but included it without having to name it:
"Before the invention of the first mechanical clocks, European communities (like most cultures, according to anthropologists) collectively kept track of time by gazing at the skies, and observing the change of the seasons."
That he mentioned the sunrise and sunset as start and completion of the day is because that is the universal measure of daytime for all indigenous cultures. The moon represents yet another cycle related to the fertility of the soil and of a woman's body.
No, the reason you "harp on sexism" is because you're obsessed with it, and see it hiding under every unturned stone. Obsession keeps us caged, as does any addiction (and it renders us terribly annoying).
I wonder if it's illegal or unconstitutional for Congress to pass a law that's, well, unconstitutional. HB 347 SB 1794. And Obama has signed it into law.
http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/11043-congress-passes-bill-severely-curtailing-first-amendment-liberties
I'm sure the Roberts Supremely Fascist Court will get right on the overturning of those bills.
It used to be that a Jury of One's Peers was the ultimate artbiter of Law as well as of Fact. A jury could refuse to convict because the Law was faulty or unjust in their eyes. Then, mostly due to Southern juries refusing to hand down convictions of murder to whites accused of killing blacks, jurors began to get instructions from the judge that mandated the Law is as it is, the jurors only have say in whether the facts in the case warrant conviction. During my last jury service, the prospective panel was sworn to uphold the Law as presented by the judge in the case. An attempt at jury nullification would mean breaking that oath, and I presume a charge of perjury. If one would not swear the oath, one would not be seated on the jury. Of course, it would be permissible to maintain that the prosecutor did not prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, but that doesn't prevent the Law being applied again in another case, as would repeated nullifications of the Law by jury.
(comment deleted by author)
Our inabiity to even remotely understand the ends to which those things that our minds can conceive will be put along with the proclivity of the strong to oppress and take advantage of the weak goes a long way to explaining our sorry state.
The same gllobal positioning technology that allows those lost in the forest or at sea to be rescued also enables drones to destroy the lives of an entire wedding party in the hopes that this or that "terorist" will be expunged or to target MIRV warhesds to destroy entire cities at the command of whoever is playing God on that particular day that their use is "implemented".
The same Internet that allows some of us to share thoughtful messages or to shop in saftey also facilitates the marketing of vile porography, identity theft, and the targeting of those who for whatever reason have been deemed "undesirables" and
in need of spying upon by whomever is playing God that particular day for whatever reason.
"Progress" will continue because it will increase the capacity of the strong to oppress everyone else and those with the mercantile urge to make lots of money. As such, "progress" will lead to an ever accelerating downward spiral towards destruction and madness. The time when we need God the most is the time that we are least capable of believing that He even exists. How profoundly ironic.
Just as predatory capitalism functions because just enough scraps are thrown to the commoners (or used to be) to keep them docile and placated, technology designed to control is considered acceptable (or even desirable) because the masses are allowed to play with it for their own entertainment.
The internet was created by the military (as is much of modern technology). The question should not be "who benefits" but "who benefits most" (and "who is ultimately the loser").
We became addicted to television because we thought that we - the viewers - were getting free programming for the price of having to watch entertaining commercials. In fact, as Jerry Mander and others have pointed out, we are the product being sold to the advertisers (Nielsen ratings determine the value of advertising space), and the TV is a hypnotic medium which puts us in a receptive state.
We have become worshippers of the idols of technology, innovation and progress - and far too many believe that "new and improved" technology will solve the problems that old technology has created. Solar panels, hybrid cars, more commercial organic canned goods and imported fair-trade coffee will lead us to the promised land.
It will, in truth, require a complete inversion of values (from those that are now upside-down) to return us to a path of wholesome living within the sensual, sentient, intelligent, reciprocal, holographic landscape that we inhabit. And, as Randall so eloquently articulated, it will require a re-imagining of time as the slow-motion cyclical flows of the natural order.
"Don't do something, just stand there."
"You Don’t Need a Clock to Know What Time [THIS] Is"
"...maybe everyone does [know], at least on some level, with a great many simply choosing to ignore the alarm bells in favor of the bells and whistles on their latest consumer gadget."
Very good rant, there, from Randall Amster. - Pointing out how self-deluded we are on what really matters to our survival. Now that we've become accustomed to denying climate extreming in order to continue "gadgeting", that habit of laxity of mind will kill a lot of US.
Meanwhile, back on the internet, attention cut-off and emotional over-indulgence on issues continue in a bewildering mix, unless we realize, each of us, that it's all about ourselves - not a far-off danger or a celebrity in distress.
We're being manipulated with comforts on incredibly deep and unfamiliar levels of constituting our selves, our identifications, our feelings of what it is to be "me". And the notion that someone sinister is in control, partly true as it is, is much more comfortable than the realization that NOBODY is in control of human culture anymore. ("Anymore", because in previous decades there always was somebody in control of the limited projects, however grand, that humans instigated - while now the projects have taken their own course, and the responsible for losing control are all pretending it wasn't them and nothing's happening).
We're like a group of children on a disintegrating raft after a capricious wave washed the adults overboard. And everybody thinks some of the older kids overview what's going on, while the older kids are busy finding out who can be exploited for their next meal.
"NOBODY is in control of human culture anymore."
Nobody ever was, but we used to honor the chaos and the Mystery. It is the illusion of control which underlies all technology and is its purpose.
What is called for now is a surrender of control to the Powers-That-Always-Were.
Remember con servatives didn't even exists a dozen millennia ago and maybe only a half dozen millennia ago. The old ways of egalitarianism have proved their worth and not just "Machiavellian status escalators" but that as well. Speciall thanks to Andrew White and David Erdal!