EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
Popular content
Today's Top News
Iraq War Logs: Military Privatization Run Amok
The Wikileaks logs provide ample evidence of private security contractors entirely unaccountable for lethal rogue actions
Shortly after 10am on 14 May 2004, a convoy of private security guards from Blackwater riding down "Route Irish" - the Baghdad airport road - shot up a civilian Iraqi vehicle. While they were at it, the Blackwater men fired shots over the heads of a group of soldiers from the 69th Regiment of the US Army before they sped away heading west in their white armored truck. When the dust cleared, the Iraqi driver was dead and his wife and daughter were injured.
A terse, 57-word dispatch in the Iraq war logs published by Wikileaks is the first public evidence of the shooting, as recorded by the US military.
The incident is one of several dozen "escalation of force" incidents involving private security companies in Iraq - which is military parlance for an unwarranted attack, almost all of which have never been previously reported. Blackwater, the company from Moyock, North Carolina, is responsible for about half of the attacks, closely followed by Erinys, a British private security company registered in the Virgin Islands, which seems to have an unusually high number of vehicle crashes.
On my four visits to Iraq in the last seven years, I learned quickly to steer clear of the fast-moving vehicles belonging to these private security companies. The men - sporting identical reflective wrap-around sunglasses, bullet-proof jackets - would aim their high-powered assault rifles and shout "Imshi" ("Move") at any vehicle that came within a 50m perimeter. Sometimes, they would throw plastic water bottles to shock pedestrians into staying away.
Easily the best-known private security company is Blackwater (recently renamed Xe), which rocketed to fame three years ago when four company security guards, escorting a convoy of US state department vehicles en route to a meeting in western Baghdad, opened fire in Nisour Square in Baghdad killing 17 Iraqi civilians. Yet, a query of the Iraq war logs for "Blackwater" or "Nisour Square" turns up nothing, at first.
In this failure to identify what is probably the most notorious carnage of Iraqi civilians, the strengths and weakness of the military reporting process (and, by association, Wikileaks) become startlingly clear. Had the media not reported this incident, there would be no way to identify the company or the location in which this massacre took place. Initially, I wondered: was it possible that the soldier who recorded the incident made a mistake or that the record was erased?
Eventually, I tracked down the incident by trying a few other methods. It is easy to see why I missed the record: there is no mention of the company, or the location, and even the death toll is incorrectly recorded as nine, suggesting that the Pentagon casualty record is incomplete.
Human rights investigators know this problem only too well. Media reports are often incomplete and government reports are sometimes deliberately vague. They are just a starting point from which painstaking research is needed to build up a true picture of what has happened.
Quite possibly, there were many more incidents in which civilians were injured, or even killed, which were never reported. Some of the reports may have been altered before they were entered into the military system. But given the other records that I found, at the very least, Wikileaks has revealed that Blackwater and other private security companies are guilty of many more injuries and killings than the media have previously reported.
Today, there as many as 40,000 armed private security contractors working in Afghanistan and Iraq, according to data collected by Commission on Wartime Contracting staff during the first quarter of 2010.
Some of them are ill-paid ex-soldiers from countries like Sierra Leone who make just $250 a month; others are former US soldiers, who are paid $500 or more per day. These men are often doing the very same jobs that soldiers once did - like guard duty - but with a lot less accountability.
Until quite recently, these men with guns were untouchable: they were protected from any kind of prosecution by Coalition Provisional Authority Order No 17, issued by Paul Bremer, the US diplomat charged with running Iraq after the 2003 invasion.
For example, Andrew J Moonen, a Blackwater employee, who has been accused of killing a guard assigned to an Iraqi vice-president on 24 December 2006, was spirited out of the country and has never faced charges in Iraq. Nor have the five men accused of opening fire in Nisour Square: Donald Ball, Dustin Laurent Heard, Evan Shawn Liberty Nicholas Abram Slatten and Paul Alvin Slough. Lawsuits in the US have also failed.
Blackwater and Erinys were not the only ones who acted with seeming impunity. Perhaps the most egregious incident occurred on 28 May 2005, when the US Marines came under fire from four white Ford pickup trucks and a gray Excursion sports utility vehicle "recklessly driving through Fallujah traveling west - and firing sporadically at vehicles".
The shooters worked for Zapata Engineering, one of five companies originally hired under a $200m contract to supervise the destruction and storage of US military ammunition worldwide. They were paid well for this work: each company manager earned an average of $275,000 a year, under their contract.
Eventually, one of the Zapata vehicles ran over a spike strip in the road near a guard house under the control of the US Marines. The Marines placed 19 Zapata employees under arrest.
At the time, Lawrence Peter, the director of the Private Security Company Association of Iraq, told my colleague David Phinney at CorpWatch:
"I can say without a shadow of a doubt that there is no company named Zapata that is a licensed private security company under the terms of CPA Memorandum 17. I do not know under what legal authority those men thought they were operating, but it was not in keeping with the law of Iraq nor consistent with what professional, responsible and law-abiding private security companies are doing here."
But Iraqis cannot tell which of these companies are licensed and which are not. Technically, they could complain to the military or raise the matter with yet another private military company named Aegis Defense from Britain, which was in charge of monitoring the movements of fellow private security contractors, under a $293m contract issued in June 2004. Yet Aegis hardly inspired confidence - one of their employees caused an uproar when he uploaded a video of security contractors shooting at Iraqis, with an Elvis Presley soundtrack to match.
Things got even worse when the Washington Post published an article about yet another security company named Triple Canopy, in which team leader Jacob C Washbourne was quoted as saying: "I want to kill somebody today."
Today, the Pentagon says that the random shootings are a thing of the past. In May 2008, an Armed Contractor Oversight Bureau (ACOB) was set up (pdf) by the US government in Iraq. Unfortunately, there is no website or any other public way to contact this important body.
Perhaps the most worrying news about private military contractors came on 18 August 2010, when the New York Times revealed that the US government was planning to double the number of private security contractors in Iraq:
"Defending five fortified compounds across the country, the security contractors would operate radars to warn of enemy rocket attacks, search for roadside bombs, fly reconnaissance drones and even staff quick reaction forces to aid civilians in distress, the officials said."
It's not just Iraqis who are worried. At a hearing in congress on 23 September 2010, Michael Thibault, co-chair of the commission on wartime contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan and a former senior Pentagon auditor, said that he was troubled by the fact that the state department had very little experience to oversee this civilian surge in Iraq:
"(I)t is not clear that it has the trained personnel to manage and oversee contract performance of a kind that has already shown the potential for creating tragic incidents and frayed relations with host countries."
Courtesy Wikileaks, we now know that many more deadly shootings have taken place by these unregulated private security contractors than we knew of before. Given this new knowledge, it is time that we demand an inquiry into the privatization of the military. Right now, the prime facie evidence is that it has considerably increased the number of unnecessary violent incidents, while reducing military discipline and accountability and costing taxpayers a bundle.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


36 Comments so far
Show AllAnother confirmation of one of Machiavelli's best pieces of advice; that mercenaries are always more trouble than they are worth, and no competent prince uses them.
Of course, Dubya was no competent prince, and Obama is continuing the stupidity.
Even without the trouble/killings, they are just too dammed expensive. One can only assume the kickbacks are equally large,
We spend entirly too much giving democracy to the world, while dismantling it here.
>^^<
But RichardCatz, the extra expense is the whole point.
Privatization of armies will only increase because they are not accountable and the corruption is just too tempting and don't think for a minute that U.S. politicians aren't getting their "fair" share especially with the SCOTUS decision that allow unlimited campaign contributions.The politicians can exclaim "I'm not responsible, the contractors did it" and they may be located outside the USA in countries with secret banking laws and no extradition, although extradition a corporation isn't possible. Some of the foreign mercenaries will eventually be unleashed inside the USA and some may have scores to settle for atrocities done in their own countries. Israeli mercenaries were used in New Orleans and they in reported that Americans were a frightened, cowardly people for non existent threats.
Sooner or later, appeals to 'patriotic duty' in support of transnational globalization interests become just a bit worn and threadbare.
Those interests, in looking ahead to that eventuality, clearly see the need for building up some kind of alternative, and mercenary greed has always been an almost universal inducement to plunder, pillage and murder. As a bonus, it works just as well domestically as it does elsewhere. Its drawbacks (and there certainly are some) are just another form of "lesser evil" in the minds of those who exploit it.
Those whom the Gods wish to destroy they first make mad. Bye bye USA and Friends.
Not fast enough. An article yesterday quoted Bush saying " the Iraqi's are our friends" just before we started bombing the hell out of them and 'liberating' them from life. We were greeted as liberators remember? We sure did a hell of a job. Outsourcing what the military used to do to make other people rich. Soldiers got sick from contaminated water , elecuted in showers and made sick from toxic burning dumps. Just to name a few of the atrocities that the US made possible.
What makes us any different then Hitler? I actually think we are worse. From endless coups that put brutal dictators in office to way back to the genocide of the Indians, the US has got millions of peoples blood on its hand. What a soulless nation we are. MLK and Reverand Wright were right. MLK. would be so disgusted with Obama. As am I. I see him out on tour and all these smiling idiots behind him buying the same shit he sold us 2 years ago.
Those people are more stupid then the teabaggers.
i share your sentiment 100%.
What country's have created a war using lies to justify an invasion. Hitler for the invasion of Poland and Bush for the invasion of Iraq.
Chatterjee sez: "Erinys, a British private security company registered in the Virgin Islands, ... seems to have an unusually high number of vehicle crashes."
***
"I TOLD them to stop driving on the left side of the road, but ..."
Must be nice to draw from an unending motor pool, Ours! oh well I guess running Iraqis one at a time is better than indiscriminatly shooting them with automatic weapons.
>^^<
Question.
At its heart is the US Military at the highest levels supportive of using Private Contracters in foreign lands as a supplement to their own forces, or would they prefer that the US Military be expanded and take over those functions instead?
Implicit in this article is that the US Militray forces are more accountable and better trained and will not "go rogue".
This is NOT a defense of Mercenaries who are the lowest of the low , it merely pointing out that the problem with the use of Violence on other peoples is a pronlem of violence and not one related to whether one wears a uniform.
The United States of America, be it in the form of Mercenary forces or its Military, or in the form of its Criminal agencies like the CIA had and have no business in Iraq and whether "Mercenaries" used or not would not is moot.
The problem, however, is rapidly increasing difficulty in equating many desired geopolitical manoeuverings with "U.S. interests", let alone with the mythologies that have been inculcated for so long by the U.S. establishment as underpinning the 'patriotic duty' of its militarist class. The "terrorists-at-the-gates" replacement for the nuclear-armed commie threat is wearing a bit thin around the edges, and a full-scale draft is out of the question for many reasons. Mercenary recruitment avoids any such issues and is much more flexible.
Agreed. There might be "soldiers of Conscience" serving a countries armed forces but I doubt you can find a single "Mercenary of Conscience" working for Blackwater.
GS, it isn't the military that wants these contractors. I have spoken to many soldiers that complain about the contractors. To their crappy service, see my other comment, to the amount of money they make.
No, it is the friends of the last administration and this one that want to spread the wealth, our taxes, to their greedy friends. Things worked much better when the military did their own support services.
Seems these guys live in a virtual state of anarchy thanks to good ol' Uncle Sam.
"Until quite recently, these men with guns were untouchable: they were protected from any kind of prosecution by Coalition Provisional Authority Order No 17, issued by Paul Bremer, the US diplomat charged with running Iraq after the 2003 invasion".
So all the SS had to do was get Himmler to issue a provisional authority order and they could have avoided the Nuremburg war trials.
Actually
Jodl released a single document to German forces serving on the Eastern Front declaring that The Geneva Conventions, as it pertained to POWS would not apply to Russian Soldiers.
For this he was tried, sentenced and hung.
So we know what "Provisional Governer Bremer" is.
While it may be true, the US invasions of Iraq, Vietnam, Korea, may well have been against international law, Who is gonna enforce said law. It's not like there is anyone hunting W, Cheney, and the boy club who brought this mess. And no court to try them.. The UN is a sham, and we should stop pretending and kick'em out of NY.
We still have all the nukes, and they have what, force of law. I'll take that bet.
>^^<
How much will tickets for the trial cost? And when will they go on sale?
Actually, they did just that on more than one occasion, and in some cases with retroactive effect. From the U.S. domestic perspective, this relatively early example following upon the so-called Night of the Long Knives is probably one of the scariest:
"The measures taken on 30 June, 1 and 2 July to suppress treasonable activities are legally considered to have been taken in emergency defence of the state."
Coming soon to a Reich nearer you. In fact, one doesn't have to search too hard to find parallels in existing U.S. legislation.
Until recently my ass. This shit is still going on and our military is finally being exposed for doing it. Not one Xe person has been prosecuted. At least the military will try the men that killed and took body parts. All of Xe's employees have gotten off.
Remember, Obummer wants to look forward. This will continue until the day the US finally dies or is wiped off the map v
I don't think The White House wanted the war in the news much before the election.
IF the Tea party had a brain they would become Peaceniks.
They could take Over. Can ya picture Sara Palin yellin "Peace now, it time to man up Washington!
Even Nixon had a "secret plan for peace" and it got him elected....
soon after he revealed the secret plan.... the largest bombing raids in history.
Many of the Tea-Party groups are against the endless imperial wars, at least from the expence angle.
The Tea-Party has no head office, and argues within it's oun ranks on a daily basis.
>^^<
This is absurd. How can people argue over the ethics of a war especially based on how capitalist it is or not? It really shows the complete lunacy of some progressives. War is bad. War is very very bad. War for religion, war for capitalism, even war for socialism, in fact war for socialism can often be the worst sort of war there is. War is the issue here and there should be no war, private contractors or not. Some progressives' obsession with capitalism is ridiculous. I think when some progressives hear a serial killer raped and killed 50 innocent women, their first thought is "I wonder how capitalism is to blame?"
i will bite and play stupid.
i have two questions for you, and i will put them in plain words that you can understand:
1) if someone invades your home, do you simply play dead? self defense is as bad as unjustified offense?
2) what "socialist wars" were worse that "what capitalist wars"? what make them worse than the others?
I think the basic argument is that capitalism inevitably creates wars, and, at least, for the us version of capitalism, needs them so bad that they will even create enemies to justify them.
Therefore, if one wishes to stand against war, according to this analysis, one is most effective in pointing out its root causes, otherwise they'll just keep happening.
"The shooters worked for Zapata Engineering, one of five companies originally hired under a $200m contract to supervise the destruction and storage of US military ammunition worldwide. "
I wonder if this Zapata Engineering has any ties with the Zapata Oil company..
When I get forwards about supporting the troops I reply with a bit of information about how I support the troops. Lately I have been calling my representatives and writing a letter to the editor regarding the IVAW "Operation Recovery" project to help wounded soldiers with PTSD, TBI,MST, who are given psychotropic drugs and sent back to battle before they are healed. I will now work on the project of letting people know that privatized armies are dangerous for civilians and U.S. troops. They also are expensive for taxpayers. You would think that the people who repeat over and over support the troops would care if mercenaries are making $500 a day doing the same thing as U.S. troops except without accountability. I don't know what the pay of the troops is but it is not $500 a day and when they get caught killing civilians, and it is made public, they may be held accountable.I want to scream, wake up American supporters of the troops, the troops are patsies for the MIC.
Genie, great comment. If anyone hear has read The Sword of Truth series, the US is the imperial army, the troop supporters are from the Old World and Obama is the new Jagang. I wonder if the mercanaries get better healthcare then our troops? I wish the new recruits and their stupid proud parents would tour a VA hospital before joining up. Daily Kos has a I GOT THE NEWS TODAY (IGTNT) that glorify the soldier that died for some corporation's greed.
Thanks for trying to get people's attention with your letters. I think they are falling on deaf ears. I live by an air force base where bumper stickers abound how they are proud parents or spouses of soldiers. But it is UT and most people still think we are fighting them over there... BS.
When will the MSM start to report the total number of armed personnel and others in Iraq and Afghanistan being paid by the US rather than the dishonest and deceptive number of US soldiers?
When the administration gives them permission.
only the private army is at fault? who's this clown? ah, former halliburton investor. jesus christ...
Hmmm
It is a sad day for humanity when the "greatest" country in the world focuses our attention on the messengers and trys desperately to ignore the problem. Our military has been totally corrupted from the outside and the inside. Our purpose in the Middle East was
a sham from day one. It continues to be a complete sham and a lie today.
Our "freedom fighters" are directly responsible for the murder of over 1 million in Iraq alone. I wonder where are the cries from the jews over this holocaust? Of course there are none-because these deaths are exactly what Israel wanted. And of course this is why we are spending over a trillion dollars a year on war for Israel. Until we put a stop to Israel's total control over our foreign policy, the atrocities in the Middle East will continue unabated. And bye the way, there are well over 100,000 "private" contractors in Iraq and Afganistan already. I don't know where the 40,000 number came from. Maybe 2003?
The purpose of the Pentagram is being the enforcement arm of the the NSA/NSC mission statements to secure and protect the resources of the world for the PREDATORY CAPITALIST WELFARE KINGS WORLDWIDE INVESTMENTS, some of which don't even pay USG taxes but get the benefits of Pentagram protection. Ummm, sound like a protection racket to me and I wonder if the Al Capone estate gets the royalties from the Pentagram that it deserves.
Why is everyone shocked?
by yet another normal war.
In every known conflict of history,
animal savagery made full the score.
Countless many would release much evil.
The history records do sadly tell,
all conflicts result in slaughter.
War planners know absolutely full well.
So they resolved to bury deeply,
and cover up facts out of sight.
What started with a barrage of lies,
everyday was done what the army denies.
Big wars have always bigger lies.
The ranks of unbiased observers are few.
This always been heavily denied.
Denial has always been known too.
With a knowing belief of falsity,
we sell our remaining soul
Such is apparent Christian perversity,
now done for love of crude black gold.
Beliefs in falseness are not new.
Religion always lies to make social glue.
All religious beliefs have led to shame.
One group kills another just the same.
If our leaders do really us represent,
their actions are what we would do too.
Unless we end our tacit consent,
the war will continue to be just what we do.