Secrets of Iraq's Death Chamber
Prisoners are being summarily executed in the government's high-security detention centre in Baghdad.
Like all wars, the dark, untold stories of the Iraqi conflict drain from its shattered landscape like the filthy waters of the Tigris. And still the revelations come.
The Independent has learnt that secret executions are being carried out in the prisons run by Nouri al-Maliki's "democratic" government.
The hangings are carried out regularly - from a wooden gallows in a small, cramped cell - in Saddam Hussein's old intelligence headquarters at Kazimiyah. There is no public record of these killings in what is now called Baghdad's "high-security detention facility" but most of the victims - there have been hundreds since America introduced "democracy" to Iraq - are said to be insurgents, given the same summary justice they mete out to their own captives.
The secrets of Iraq's death chambers lie mostly hidden from foreign eyes but a few brave Western souls have come forward to tell of this prison horror. The accounts provide only a glimpse into the Iraqi story, at times tantalisingly cut short, at others gloomily predictable. Those who tell it are as depressed as they are filled with hopelessness.
"Most of the executions are of supposed insurgents of one kind or another," a Westerner who has seen the execution chamber at Kazimiyah told me. "But hanging isn't easy." As always, the devil is in the detail.
"There's a cell with a bar below the ceiling with a rope over it and a bench on which the victim stands with his hands tied," a former British official, told me last week. "I've been in the cell, though it was always empty. But not long before I visited, they'd taken this guy there to hang him. They made him stand on the bench, put the rope round his neck and pushed him off. But he jumped on to the floor. He could stand up. So they shortened the length of the rope and got him back on the bench and pushed him off again. It didn't work."
There's nothing new in savage executions in the Middle East - in the Lebanese city of Sidon 10 years ago, a policeman had to hang on to the legs of a condemned man to throttle him after he failed to die on the noose - but in Baghdad, cruel death seems a speciality.
"They started digging into the floor beneath the bench so that the guy would drop far enough to snap his neck," the official said. "They dug up the tiles and the cement underneath. But that didn't work. He could still stand up when they pushed him off the bench. So they just took him to a corner of the cell and shot him in the head."
The condemned prisoners in Kazimiyah, a Shia district of Baghdad, are said to include rapists and murderers as well as insurgents. One prisoner, a Chechen, managed to escape from the jail with another man after a gun was smuggled to them. They shot two guards dead. The authorities had to call in the Americans to help them recapture the two. The Americans killed one and shot the Chechen in the leg. He refused medical assistance so his wound went gangrenous. In the end, the Iraqis had to operate and took all the bones out of his leg. By the time he met one Western visitor to the prison, "he was walking around on crutches with his boneless right leg slung over his shoulder".
In many cases, it seems, the Iraqis neither keep nor release any record of the true names of their captives or of the hanged prisoners. For years the Americans - in charge of the notorious Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad - did not know the identity of their prisoners. Here, for example, is new testimony given to The Independent by a former Western official to the Anglo-US Iraq Survey Group, which searched for the infamous but mythical weapons of mass destruction: "We would go to the interrogation rooms at Abu Ghraib and ask for a particular prisoner. After about 40 minutes, the Americans brought in this hooded guy, shuffling along, shackled hands and feet.
"They sat him on a chair in front of us and took off his hood. He had a big beard. We asked where he received his education. He repeatedly said 'Mosul'. Then he said he'd left school at 14 - remember, this guy is supposed to be a missile scientist. We said: 'We know you've got a PhD and went to the Sorbonne - we'd like you to help us with information about Saddam's missile project'. But I said to myself : 'This guy doesn't know anything 'bout fucking missiles.' Then it turned out he had a different name from the man we'd asked for, he'd been picked up on the road by the Americans four months earlier, he didn't know why. So we said to the Americans: 'Wrong gentleman!' So they put the shackles on him and took him back to his cell and after 20 or 30 minutes, they'd bring someone else. We'd ask him where he went to school and he told us he had never been to school.
"Wrong person again. It was a complete farce. The incompetence of the US military was astounding, criminal. Eventually, of course, they found the right guy and brought him in and took his hood off. He was breathing heavily, overweight, pudgy, disoriented, a little bit scared."
On this occasion, the Americans had found the right man. The British and American investigators asked the guards to remove the man's shackles, which they did - but then they tied one of the man's legs to the floor. Yes, he had a PhD.
Again, the official's testimony: "We went through his history, what he'd worked on - he was obviously just a minor functionary in one of Saddam's missile programmes. Iraqi scientists didn't have the knowledge how to make nuclear missiles nor did they have the financial support necessary. It just remained in the dreams of Saddam."
The scientist-prisoner in Abu Ghraib miserably told his captors that he'd been arrested by the Americans after they'd knocked on his front door in Baghdad and found two Kalashnikov rifles a woman's hijab, verses from the Koran and, obviously of interest to his captors, "physics and missile textbooks on his bookshelves." But this supposedly valuable prisoner was never charged or previously interviewed even though he admitted he was a rocket scientist.
"I don't know what happened to him," the former official told me. "I tried to tell the UK and the US military that we've arrested this man but that he's got a wife, children, a family. I said that by locking up this one innocent person, you've got 50 men radicalised overnight. No, I don't know what happened to him."
For many of the investigators working for the Anglo-American authorities in Baghdad, the trial for the crime for which the Iraqi dictator was himself subsequently hanged was a fearful experience that ultimately ended in disgust. Through captured documents, they could see the dark, inner workings of Saddam's secret police. The idea of the Saddam trial was less to bring members of the former regime to justice than to show Iraqis how justice and the rule of law should operate.
"It was exhilarating to see Saddam being cross-examined," one of the court investigators said. "The low point was when he was executed. What drove me on was seeing how Saddam dealt with his victims - I was looking at a microcosm of all the deaths that had taken place in Iraq. But when he was executed, it was done in such a savage way."
Saddam Hussein was hanged in the same "secure" unit at Kazimiyah where Mr al-Maliki's people, in an echo of Saddamite Baathist terror, now hang their victims.
Iraq The death penalty
*The death penalty in Iraq was suspended after Saddam Hussein was deposed in 2003. It was reinstated by the interim government in August 2004.
*The United Nations, the European Union and international human rights organisations all spoke out against the reintroduction.
*At the time, the government claimed the death penalty was a necessary measure until the country had stabilised. Amnesty International claims that "the extent of violence in Iraq has increased rather than diminished, clearly indicating that the death penalty has not proved to be an effective deterrent."
*Saddam, left, his half-brother Barzan al-Tikriti and Iraq's former chief judge Awad Hamed al-Bandar were hanged at the end of 2006 for their part in the killings of 148 people in the mainly Shia town of Dujail in 1982. Illicit videos of all three executions later became public. Saddam's body could be seen on a hospital trolley, his head twisted at 90 degrees. Barzan - Iraq's former intelligence chief -was decapitated by the noose. Officials said it was an accident.
*According to Amnesty, there were at least 33 executions reported in Iraq last year. About 200 people were estimated to have been sentenced to death.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
23 Comments so far
Show AllIn a real democracy, with real media, and real debates, someone should have asked our Presdential puppet candidates about this during the debate. "Do you support a secret death chamber in Iraq where hundreds of people have been executed, some by very cruel means?"
I couldn't have stood to watch those phony debates, so I don't know. But I'm guessing this wasn't one of the questions?
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
To Batvette:
If I am not wrong, Saddam is dead?
Please check the record of your Secret Service before posting such a naive
comment. Saddam was supported over a long time by the US goverment and the US goverment didn't cared much how he treated the Iraqi people.
Bringing 'democracy' didn't work? But that was never the objective in first place. This was just a kind of 'wrapping' paper to cover the real intention of the US goverment. The goal was to exit (or execute) Saddam and install a military station in this region. Mission accomplished. How are the Iraqi people doing? Better? More democracy? Free press under US control?
Your US goverment is fully responsible about what unfolded in Iraq.
US goverment has used human rights as toilet paper.
I think that you have plenty of home work to do to make sure that democracy is restored in the biggest 'democracy' in the world?
Would be nice that your tax payers money is spend at home. Looks like a mess to me. Would be nice to see that lobbying are not always overwriting the interest of the US citizen.
I understand that Business interest comes first and that something will dribble down to the US working class.
You're also wrong Frank.
The intent was to get our militants killed and disabled. Now 4000 are dead and near 40,000 have been disabled. A few hundred thousand Iraqi militants are also dead which is convenient for the powers that be. The primary aim though is to kill our own service members. Evidenced by their using nuclear bullets called DU penetrators from their vehicles. The DU becomes a dust when it smashes through something and will ultimately lead to cancer and other debilitating diseases. Our troops are over there breathing that stuff. Further evidenced by their being sent over there with humvees that aren't even armored. The humvees that most of them are riding around in are equivalent to the civilian version and easily crumpled by improvised explosives. Further evidenced by Bush dismissing the whole of the Iraqi Army and without their rightful pension AND letting them keep their government issued weapons. Further evidenced by the infrastructure being let rot so badly that no self respecting people would allow the continued rule of such corrupt leadership. I'm talking about fecal waste puddles, many areas with no running water, 4 hours of electricity per day and the situation still exists all these years later.
Elbridge Gerry on the floor of the constitutional convention:
"Why sir do governments raise an army? But to destroy the militia."
The Constitution thus established a US militia. In the late 1700s the entirety of the US Army was 800 men whose primary purpose was "protecting settlers" from natives.
I'm guessing most people in that day didn't even know there was an army.
Further, most likely, Saddam is NOT dead. He's gotten some plastic surgery and a new identity. He well served the financial dominant right up to his allowing his nation to be taken by the Empire.
The impostor who attended his trial was OBVIOUSLY NOT Saddam. Saddam had a mole on his left temple. The impostor had a mole on the left hand side of his frontal forehead. They barely looked anything alike.
With all the underground facilities Saddam had made, he's found in a shabby little hole in the ground, with a military uniform on!? If he was trying to hide, why would he be trooping around in his dress blues? Ridiculous. He'd have a wig on and a pair of fake tits. As the leader of a nation he'd easily have access to fake papers to alter his identity.
The impostor in the execution video isn't even the impostor that stood trial! That Saddam Hussein was executed is baseless.
There was a report that al Zarqawi was killed in the opening hours of the war when his home was shelled. Years later he was being used as the ever elusive al Qaeda boogeyman in Iraq. He's said to have been in a video cutting off the head of Nick Berg who had CIA contacts and was in contact with the "20th hijacker". Problem is Zarqawi had only 1 leg and the guy in the beheading video clearly had 2 legs. The camera used to film it was one of the same cameras that was used in the abu ghraib prison abuse scandal. This was discovered by the image bearing a digital signature. Finally when the US public had become quite sick of the war a report claimed Zarqawi was disintegrated by bomb in a air raid on a house.
The trickery in use by the now 14 US spy agencies is vast.
rocyahsoul@yahoo.com
www.lamegame.name
Daniel Vincent Kelley
Fool, you have chosen your moniker well!
The surge has not worked!
What has worked has been the ethic cleansing of sunni from mixed neighborhoods. What has worked has been the hiring of people (at $300/month/person) who had been shooting at US troops these past years to shoot at other people.
At the moment, there is only one Empire -- whether it is evil or not is a question the future will show. I tremble to think of what the answer will be.
Russia is not an empire (anymore)although it would like to be great power again.
Iran is certainly not an empire. Heck they haven't even committed aggressive war since the 1700's.
America is NOT bringing light to the world. It has no such obligation and has no mission either from any God or history. This "Last best Hope" and "A city of light upon the hill" is refried crapola from the remains of the "Manifest Destiny" after the "west was won" (officially in the 1880s). Alternatively, it is a rehash of the "mission" the Brits had to bring "civilization" to the dark races (whilst they ripped off their resources) ala Kipling and the "White Man's Burden".
_________
There's a glory in the morning because the earth turns 'round and a promise in the evening when the sun goes down
I'm really hoping 'fool' was being sarcastic.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
I didn't hear anything about this during the presidential debates. Fisk obviously dosn't understand that the surge has worked, and that victory is at hand so long as america supports its troops. And by the way, the debates also confirmed that there are evil empires on the earth such as russia and iran. These countries believe that they can impose their will upon other nations. They think that they can, with impunity, spread darkness over the earth and destroy the shining lights of democracy such as israel and the usa.
No matter. America shall continue in its mission, no, its obligation, to to bring light to thr world.
"Prisoners are being summarily executed in the government's high-security detention centre in Baghdad."
This is a test run for the United States should the Republicans maintain power.
Why do you say "Republicans"?
The Democrats have supported this war and this policy from day one. And, the current Democratic party and its Presidential candidate supports the death penalty here in the US.
The odds of this happening in the US seem to be pretty much the same whether its Dems or Repubs in power here.
The Democrats continually try to spread this myth that its all the Republicans fault. That's not true. But its vital to the Dems, and if you listen closely, almost all of their campaigns are built upon this myth.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
It could also be used by people here when they get their power back.
Before you get your private parts in a twist go back and read my post. I wasnt dissing Fisk for his exemplary work. Ive heard him speak several times. But i can never forget this one time he came to my city on a talking tour 2 months after we invaded Iraq and started the process of genocide. Instead of focussing on the false pretext we used to attack and destroy a country, we were subjected to a photo essay of Saddams prisons and all the horrors 'our' dictator committed. It was surrealistic to say the least. I wasnt sure if he was somehow subliminally justifying our attack or if he was hoping that our galloping into Iraq on a white horse was actually intended to save the wretched Iraqis ! Ah well ... sorry i doubted your hero. My bad.
You seem to be insisting that Mr. Fisk only talk about what you want to hear about.
Nothing I've ever seen from Mr. Fisk ever denies that Saddam was a creature of the US for at least a decade. So, when an excellent reporter comes to your down and shows you facts and evidence of what has been happening in another part of the world, why do you react this way? I rather doubt that Mr. Fisk was openly saying that the horrors he showed you were a justification for a war he's steadily opposed since before it began. So, this seems to be something going on in your head.
Mr. Fisk is a good journalist. As a good journalist, he tends to stick to facts. Stuff he can research. Stuff he can document. He's not someone who's going to stand up and rant about speculation about policy. He's going to uncover facts and evidence and present them to the world. What your brain does with those facts is your business. Please don't attack a good journalist because of what's going on inside your own head.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
Maybe you should re-read my post before i waste my energy on you.
@ mediaho, you say you read Fisk's articles, and yet you show the ignorance of a troll in regards to the underlying meaning in his journalism. Geeze, this is the guy who had his articles about gassing of Iranian cannon fodder during the Iraq/Iran War censored because they were too controversial (ie they said bad things about "our" dictator.
The bottom line is that Iraqis have been dieing violently at a greater rate, summary and arbitrary executions, and yes, there have been rape rooms. For this we paid 4000 lives, the Iraqis 1 million, no end in sight and we haven't got control over the friggin' OIL!!!
There's a glory in the morning because the earth turns 'round and a promise in the evening when the sun goes down
Unfortunatly, this sort of thing is what America does best !
Thanks. One mistake I see is that people seem to think this is something new for America and Bush. But, if you dig a little bit, you'll find a trail that stretches back through time and around the world to places like Central America, Vietnam, Greece, Indonesian, Chile and many other places.
I'd say it stretches back to the end of world war ii, but then I remember Mark Twain's writings about the Phillipines and the ethnic clensing of the American indians, and then I'm not sure that's even true as a limit on when this began.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
Yeah ... ive had muslim boyfriends and black boyfriends and girlfriends (!) and that doesnt make me an expert on Islam or Race. However, I read Fisk's articles and while most of what you said is true (his reporting on Israel and Lebanon is brilliant) and while I cannot in any form hold a candle to his journalistic excellence I can definitely state what i feel on the inside. Of late I see this tendency in him to glorify or in the least wistfully look back at the 'good old benevlent Empire'.
Please point to the portions of this piece that 'look back at the 'good old benevlent Empire'.
I see factual reporting on evidence and testimony that Mr. Fisk has gathered about a secret death chamber in Iraq. As a good reporter, he's telling the world about this.
I don't see a word in this piece that refers to the good old benevlent Empire. That seems to be entirely in your own head.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
Could there be any better argument for getting US forces out of Iraq than this article? Of all ironies of this stupid engagement, none is greater than the forces of the west emulating the barbaric cruelty they so deplored prior to going in to facilitate "regime change"--what regime change?
Poet
The only thing your point "argues" is if we aren't looking it doesn't happen.
Did we think Iraqis raised in Saddam's world would suddenly be gentle pacifists?
It's a slow evolution. Don't give up, we still need oil.
the liberal republican
Fisk can barely conceal his imperial distaste for all things Arab. I think the West ('Great' Britain, U.S., Israel and all our cronies) have causes far more deaths (gruesome deaths) than all the armies and wars of the middle-east put together. This fact seems to be lost on Fisk, who insists on detailing the cruelty of Arabs, while indulging in breast-beating when it comes to Imperial shenanigans (Why, Oh Why are we doing this in Iraq .. arent we the good guys?).
It's all about context.... WE aren't doing this in Iraq. WE didn't create their culture. WE can't change them overnight. WE brought freedom of the press when there was none, so WE can now report things like this.
If you think WE are the bad guys, not Saddam, your perspective is lacking.
thank you for considering my opinion.
the liberal republican
Saddam's been dead for years. I kinda doubt that trying to blame him for this sort of disgusting behavior is very accurate.
I don't quite see how you can say 'we' aren't doing this in Iraq. This is our puppet government. We created it. We wrote its constitution. We hand-picked its leader. It pretty much does whatever we tell it to do. One thing that's pretty damn obvious is that 'we' are the ones doing this.
The interesting question is why don't you want to admit this to yourself. You are supporting an evil policy. You are supporting a nasty, evil war, and all that comes with it. But, you seem rather anxious to deny that 'we' have anything to do with it. Why? Are you not very comfortable with the US being an evil empire?
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
Robert Fisk lives in Lebanon, has an arabic girl friend, speaks the language (and several others) fluently, and has been covering every major war in Arab lands at great personal risk to his own life for nearly 40 years.
If Fisk is disgusted at anything, it is how his own country and the US have enabled the basic injustice that is about the most unifying thing all middle eastern nations (includiung Israel) have in common.
Poet