EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama Caves in to Coal Pressure
The celebration was short for the Obama administration's expected crackdown on devastating coal-mining practices in Kentucky and West Virginia.
Back in March, the applause and good press rolled in.
A retooled Environmental Protection Agency, under administrator Lisa Jackson, announced that it was formally questioning a couple of mountaintop-removal permit applications and would scrutinize others for compliance with the Clean Water Act and other federal laws.
With considerably less fanfare, the EPA last month quietly informed a congressman from West Virginia that it had given the green light to 42 permit applications while raising concerns about six others in the Corps of Engineers' Huntington district.
There hasn't been time for a thorough review of 42 mining permits, so we can only assume that the administration caved to pressure from coal interests.
That assumption is confirmed by the Los Angeles Times which reports that there was a "series of White House meetings with coal companies and advocates," including U.S. Rep. Nick Rahall, D-West Virginia, and West Virginia's Democratic Gov. Joe Manchin.
In the letter to Rahall, Michael H. Shapiro, the EPA's acting assistant administrator, wrote, "I understand the importance of coal mining in Appalachia for jobs, the economy and meeting the nation's energy needs."
Yes, we need jobs and electricity.
But coal can be gotten out of the ground without burying hundreds of miles of headwater streams under valley fills or flattening miles of mountainous landscape.
Such destructive practices are not necessary, as Appalachian historian Ron Eller recently told a group in Eastern Kentucky, they're just cheaper.
It's the height of false economy to destroy one of the world's oldest forests, poison the water and ruin a region's environment to save pennies on a ton of coal and line the pockets of coal-company investors.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

10 Comments so far
Show AllCD obviously has a template for it's headlines: "Obama caves in to _________________."
Just fill in the blank with your favorite source of corporate irrepsonsibility or political hysteria.
q
quickstepper, couldn't think of a favorite. Could you revise your template with spaces to list maybe 10 of your "favorite" cave-ins?
Let's put it this way-- instead of a Presidential Library, Obama's legacy will be enshrined in the District of Columbia's very own brand-new Unnatural Wonder: "Obama Caves" State (or District) Park.
Perfect for both spelunkers AND the homeless!
· Yr Obd't Servant
Sioux Rose
O.S. Yeah, looks like that'll be the leit motif for some time.
Don't you read the by-lines? This was an editorial by the Lexington, Kentucky, Herald Leader.
The argument in this editorial is the crux of the matter. MTR miming is not vital for securing the US coal supply - it is method that is used only because it is a bit more profitable than other mining methods. It could be banned with no impact on coal supply or prices.
And no, it doesn't save lives either. Nowadays, surface mining isn't safer than underground mining. All of the six coal mine fatalities so far this year have been at surface mines or at surface facilities of underground mines. In 2008, similar numbers died in each mine type. About 60-70% of coal in the eastern US comes from underground mines.
It's more than 10. This one really makes me mad. (If I wasn't mad enough already)
When the toxic sludge hits the Potomac intake pipes for the DC water supply, all those Congressmen will be jumping up and down looking for the culprit, and they'll stop this serial rape.
I doubt it. They are more inclined to force taxpayers to pay for the superfund clean up....
"I understand the importance of coal mining in Appalachia for jobs, the economy and meeting the nation's energy needs."
Shapiro has no such understanding. But he parrots the words he understands will keep him in his job as a top cog in the great machine. The nation's energy needs are something entirely different than the "more more more" gluttony that elites demand that we need. They want a bigger/badder empire. They want veto power over the entire planet. And ever growing consumption in an already gluttonous society is the way to get there. Like milk cows, USans can hardly resist the increasing volume of hay thrown at them. They make more milk, cycle through new cars and homes faster and faster.
Since Lincoln, every president has striven for government of the rich, by the rich, for the rich. When the rich dangle from every lamp-post across Merka, the tree of liberty will be refreshed.