EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Israel: Boycott, Divest, Sanction
It's time. Long past time. The best strategy to end the increasingly bloody occupation is for Israel to become the target of the kind of global movement that put an end to apartheid in South Africa.
In July 2005 a huge coalition of Palestinian groups laid out plans to do just that. They called on "people of conscience all over the world to impose broad boycotts and implement divestment initiatives against Israel similar to those applied to South Africa in the apartheid era." The campaign Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions--BDS for short--was born.Every day that Israel pounds Gaza brings more converts to the BDS cause, and talk of cease-fires is doing little to slow the momentum. Support is even emerging among Israeli Jews. In the midst of the assault roughly 500 Israelis, dozens of them well-known artists and scholars, sent a letter to foreign ambassadors stationed in Israel. It calls for "the adoption of immediate restrictive measures and sanctions" and draws a clear parallel with the antiapartheid struggle. "The boycott on South Africa was effective, but Israel is handled with kid gloves.... This international backing must stop."
Yet many still can't go there. The reasons are complex, emotional and understandable. And they simply aren't good enough. Economic sanctions are the most effective tools in the nonviolent arsenal. Surrendering them verges on active complicity. Here are the top four objections to the BDS strategy, followed by counterarguments.
1. Punitive measures will alienate rather than persuade Israelis. The world has tried what used to be called "constructive engagement." It has failed utterly. Since 2006 Israel has been steadily escalating its criminality: expanding settlements, launching an outrageous war against Lebanon and imposing collective punishment on Gaza through the brutal blockade. Despite this escalation, Israel has not faced punitive measures--quite the opposite. The weapons and $3 billion in annual aid that the US sends to Israel is only the beginning. Throughout this key period, Israel has enjoyed a dramatic improvement in its diplomatic, cultural and trade relations with a variety of other allies. For instance, in 2007 Israel became the first non-Latin American country to sign a free-trade deal with Mercosur. In the first nine months of 2008, Israeli exports to Canada went up 45 percent. A new trade deal with the European Union is set to double Israel's exports of processed food. And on December 8, European ministers "upgraded" the EU-Israel Association Agreement, a reward long sought by Jerusalem.
It is in this context that Israeli leaders started their latest war: confident they would face no meaningful costs. It is remarkable that over seven days of wartime trading, the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange's flagship index actually went up 10.7 percent. When carrots don't work, sticks are needed.
2. Israel is not South Africa. Of course it isn't. The relevance of the South African model is that it proves that BDS tactics can be effective when weaker measures (protests, petitions, back-room lobbying) have failed. And there are indeed deeply distressing echoes: the color-coded IDs and travel permits, the bulldozed homes and forced displacement, the settler-only roads. Ronnie Kasrils, a prominent South African politician, said that the architecture of segregation that he saw in the West Bank and Gaza in 2007 was "infinitely worse than apartheid."
3. Why single out Israel when the United States, Britain and other Western countries do the same things in Iraq and Afghanistan? Boycott is not a dogma; it is a tactic. The reason the BDS strategy should be tried against Israel is practical: in a country so small and trade-dependent, it could actually work.
4. Boycotts sever communication; we need more dialogue, not less. This one I'll answer with a personal story. For eight years, my books have been published in Israel by a commercial house called Babel. But when I published The Shock Doctrine, I wanted to respect the boycott. On the advice of BDS activists, I contacted a small publisher called Andalus. Andalus is an activist press, deeply involved in the anti-occupation movement and the only Israeli publisher devoted exclusively to translating Arabic writing into Hebrew. We drafted a contract that guarantees that all proceeds go to Andalus's work, and none to me. In other words, I am boycotting the Israeli economy but not Israelis.
Coming up with this plan required dozens of phone calls, e-mails and instant messages, stretching from Tel Aviv to Ramallah to Paris to Toronto to Gaza City. My point is this: as soon as you start implementing a boycott strategy, dialogue increases dramatically. And why wouldn't it? Building a movement requires endless communicating, as many in the antiapartheid struggle well recall. The argument that supporting boycotts will cut us off from one another is particularly specious given the array of cheap information technologies at our fingertips. We are drowning in ways to rant at one another across national boundaries. No boycott can stop us.
Just about now, many a proud Zionist is gearing up for major point-scoring: don't I know that many of those very high-tech toys come from Israeli research parks, world leaders in infotech? True enough, but not all of them. Several days into Israel's Gaza assault, Richard Ramsey, the managing director of a British telecom company, sent an e-mail to the Israeli tech firm MobileMax. "As a result of the Israeli government action in the last few days we will no longer be in a position to consider doing business with yourself or any other Israeli company."
When contacted by The Nation, Ramsey said his decision wasn't political. "We can't afford to lose any of our clients, so it was purely commercially defensive."
It was this kind of cold business calculation that led many companies to pull out of South Africa two decades ago. And it's precisely the kind of calculation that is our most realistic hope of bringing justice, so long denied, to Palestine.
Further Reading: Disengagement and the Frontiers of Zionism
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


194 Comments so far
Show AllThe Glue That Holds Chaos Together
All excellent points, but let's be more specific and suggest that we need to get non-stop video feeds from Gaza sent to the States and the rest of the world, through government enforced media coverage.
Pathos,
Why wouldn't the Israeli government/Military allow reporters into Gaza if they themselves figured that they were doing everything above board?
Seems that you only bar reporters (or make it too dangerous for them to stay) if you have something to hide.
Of course you are right. This should have been done years ago. I only hope its not too late...
Come on, even Chomsky disagrees with divesting against Israel.
What about the people of Israel? What about the children?
Aren't you all the same people who argued against using sanctions in Iraq, because we had to think of the Iraqi people?
But I guess you feel it's fine to starve Zionist for the crime of defending themselves.
Regardless, there are not enough Israel-haters out there to make a boycott effective.
The comments of a committed fool are consistently irrelevant.
.Frankly I am unaware if anything can restore your severely damaged reputation at this forum. But the inclusion of links in support of your claims might be a start in that direction. I am unaware of Chomsky's views on this subject, perhaps you might enlighten me with a link to that position?
I wont hold my breath.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
.Ok so, in the interest of truth and clarity I didn't wait for smarmy,errr, Joe, to provide what he should have originally....Here's Mr. Chomsky's position on the boycott:
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/2002/2002-July/017363.html
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
We just need Bob Dylan, Ringo Starr , Lou Reed, Peter Gabriel, Jackson Browne , U2, Keith Richards, Ronnie Wood, Bonnie Raitt, and Joey Ramone to take a stand again.
Bet some of their mothers will be pretty disappointed.
On a more serious note Annie Lennox has been speaking up at protests in London.
The real trick is that the big money comes from the US taxpayers. Boycotting that will be about the same as saying I'm boycotting the Iraq war.
______________________________________
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it, misdiagnosing it and then misapplying the wrong remedies. " Groucho Marx
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people."
H. L. Mencken
"We just need Bob Dylan, Ringo Starr , Lou Reed, Peter Gabriel, Jackson Browne , U2, Keith Richards, Ronnie Wood, Bonnie Raitt, and Joey Ramone to take a stand again."
Good luck in digging up Joey's body; his grave in NJ is surrounded by barbed wire (or it should be).
Dylan is a pretty strong supporter of Israel. See his song Neighborhood Bully. Not surprising for someone so intelligent. I don't think any of those people are going to openly support terrorism, which is what criticizing Israel amounts to.
Anyway, people are welcome to try boycotts and sanctions against Israel. Unfortunately, without public support, which doesn't exist, it won't work. But go ahead and try.
Mikep thinks "criticizing Israel" amounts to "open support for terrorism."
Is he for real?
I dare them to arrest me for such "support for terrorism"...the shackles of fear are right now being broken around the world. Israel is generating a world wide storm against its evil tyranny. A day of reconning is coming for Israel and its backers.
Dylan went to Israel as a stunt MikeP mainly to fuck with his public image, he's no ones talking point tin soldier, unlike you:
"Dylan did almost anything to shatter the lofty image many people had of him. He writes that he intentionally made bad records, and once poured whiskey over his head in public.
He also writes that, as a stunt, he went to Israel and made a point of having his picture taken at the Wailing Wall wearing a skullcap. When he went to Israel, he writes that the newspapers changed him overnight into a Zionist. How did this help?
CBS) "If the common perception of me out there in the public was that I was either a drunk, or I was a sicko, or a Zionist, or a Buddhist, or a Catholic, or a Mormon – all of this was better than 'Archbishop of Anarchy,'" says Dylan, referring to being considered the voice of a generation opposed to everything.
Dylan was especially opposed to the media, which he says were always trying to pin him down. He wrote, "The press, I figured, you lied to it."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/12/02/60minutes/main658799.shtml
Naomi Klein I bought that book. You are a crdit to the human race. I feel the UK and independent states in the EU must be targeted to break ranks. God help us all for allowing complicity in this to terrible venture to persist. There has to be justice and criminals must be confronted, whatever the cost. Some country must break ranks.
I tie this to The Lisbon Treaty in Ireland being given a re-run. Let the elites Sarkozy and Merkle the Dutch, Belgians, the Czechs and Poles know that Lisbon is dead and the Irish people will not allow some EU foreign minister represent us in war crimes as EU solidarity persists.
Campaign in Ireland before the vote and ask at what cost would Irish people representing the European populations who have no say vote, follow this dreadful EU relationship with the rogue state's crimes. Unless and until The European Union severs all ties with Israel till it fully complies with International Law it dies with its ally forthwith. How dare the elites in European capitals disgard their citizens voices? Let them rot and stew with their Zionist masters. They will make Gazians of us all soon enough if they can. Waken up to the terror of the situation everybody who is human and free!!! What is democratic about what is happening in Gaza? Ask around the world with truth and information about realities. Nobody who is a human being could condone or support such barbarity. Those who do are either ignorant or liars and psychopaths, thieves and deluded lunatics, greedy, insatiable, selfish and cruel, mean and vile, lost and powerful usurers. We support them? Who are we?
Not me, my friends, my family or my Palestinian brothers and sisters. I will fight for them to-day and forever confronting such bullies and such terrorism. Break EU and USA first. Country by country. Divide and rule like they do. Go for their wallets, they are ours anyway. Good luck Naomi and God Bless. Thanks!
Yeah I bought that book too when I normally get books from the library specifically to support Naomi Klein and the resurgence of a serious economic analysis from the left which I think is damn important. I also support the buycott of Citgo. Seeing as our protests are ignored by the corporate MSM, and our petitions ad well by the bought off government economic carrots and sticks may be the only tool we have for now to change policy.
Why are you boycotting Citgo?
"Venezuelan-owned Citgo Petroleum, which had indicated earlier it might end a home heating oil assistance program for low-income Americans, said yesterday it had decided to continue the program. Citgo chief executive Alejandro Granado cited "the current global financial crisis and its impact on the oil industry in general" as reasons for renewing the assistance. Before Christmas, Citgo, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Venezuelan state oil company, had told the nonprofit group Citizens Energy, which administers the program, that the effort was "suspended until further notice." The program provided assistance to 200,000 households in 23 states last year."
Complete story at:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/ny-world085991739jan08,0,6209909.story
-- ekaton aka d.k.shaw
They wrote BUYcott not boycott...
I stand corrected. A buycott of Citgo makes total sense. The topic being the boycott of Isreal, I misread buycott as boycott.
-- ekaton aka d.k.shaw
Naomi Klein was the Keynote Speaker at the Independent Jewish Voices (Canada)'s first meeting.
The IJV says: "As a Jew and on behalf of the Jews across Canada who support peace and justice, I stand in solidarity with Palestinian people in condemning the Israeli massacre of the people of Gaza."
(video of Klein's keynote speech is at the bottom)
http://ijvcanada.blogspot.com/
Naomi Klein's husband is Avi Lewis (also the offspring of two Jewish parents). Avi was covering the American election for Aljazeera. This is his piece on the Israli lobby:
Inside USA - Lobbying for Israel - 05 April 2008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOvdQ7vPLn0
When Avi hosted The Big Picture, he became very upset with one Zionist guest who made Avital (the Israeli spokesperson) seem almost normal by comparison.
Naomi's married? Darn!
Give 'em, gal! You're right on the mark. What's not to love about a really decent woman and intellectual it hitting right on the mark? Stand your ground. The struggle continues-- thanks for the leadership.
AD
I think this is a very good idea. Klein didn't mention that such a divestment and boycotting tactic would be portrayed as "antisemitic" by much of Israel's diehard apologists. Of course this has nothing to do with antisemitism since many Israeli Jews and Jews from around the world support divestment and boycotting Israel.
From 1948 to 1962, the U.S had an arms embargo on Israel. It would be great if it could be reinstated, although that seems extremely unlikely at this point. Besides the boycott, we must do everything we can to neutralize and expose AIPAC for what it is first, and other Zionist-Likudnik lobbying groups.
We have friends in Israel in the Peacenow movement - http://www.peacenow.org.il/site/en/homepage.asp
Don't forget the courageous Orthodox Jews against Zionism - http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/
Naomi Klein is right. The one thing more powerful than money is public opinion. And the strategy she is really advocating is not a bad one, not the boycott, that she rightly points out is just a tactic. But realistic reports and rational claims.
Gee, if public opinion is more powerful than money, then why is the former constantly ignored by US politicosas proven by many polls?
Chomsky calls it the "democracy gap".
.Money buys public opinion...
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
One of the most effective boycotts of apartheid South Africa was the sporting one. It succeeded, not just because South African teams could not play against other countries' teams (and South Africa are very very good at rugby union and cricket), but also because it hurt their pride. South Africans take their sport very seriously and the sporting boycott was taken seriously. And when SA was allowed back into the community of nations, and their rugby team was on the verge of winning the World Cup, the sight of President Mandela wearing a Springbok shirt and urging the team on was one of the great moments in sport.
So keep the Israeli sports teams off the rosters?
I'm trying my best not to laugh and make a non-PC joke or 20 here. The light reading joke in airplane I can't get out of my head though.
______________________________________
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it, misdiagnosing it and then misapplying the wrong remedies. " Groucho Marx
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people."
H. L. Mencken
I just tore up my mint condition Sandy Kofax rookie card in protest of Israel...
.Koufax, and even though I hated the Dodgers I loved watching him pitch!
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
ardee:you hated the Brooklyn Dodgers? or the LA? Only Rudy G. admitted to that, and he said it was because his father was for the Brooklyn Dodgers, so he was a Yankees fan. What was your team? (Disclosure:I was a Brooklyn Dodgers fan, now a Mets fan, after a hiatus of no baseball from 1957 to 1985. I hate the Yankees....)
.I hated the Brooklyn Dodgers, I hate the LA version also. ( Hate is a rather strong word, but its in a sports context after all). I was born in the Bronx, so my early choices were limited to the Yankees or the Giants. As a resident of the Bronx I was obligated to hate 'dem bums'! The Yankees were too much like rooting for the front runner so I went with the underdog Giants. Still am a fan of the orange anbd black.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
ardee:My husband hated the Giants. He knew about the rivalry in the National League. I hated the Yankees. When I was a kid, the Bklyn Dodgers had Jackie Robinson. I saw the last game of the World Series in 1955 at a friend's apartment. I still remember it. And 1986.
I had relatives in the Bronx; was there twice as a little kid for weddings. Am a bit older than you. I now am a Mets fan, as I said, but since players move around so much (and didn't eons ago; free agency was good), I tend to root for certain players wherever they go, after they've been a Met. How great is the Mets gift to us all,in 2009? New bullpen pitcher J. J. Putz!!! I can't wait for the season to begin and hope he's staying.
."My husband hated the Giants"
We all have our own crosses to bear, I will try to think nice thoughts about him anyway!
On Oct. 8th, 1956 I had the distinct honor of accompanying my Father to Yankee Stadium, where he had been given two tickets for the world series game against your husband's Dodgers. In the row in front of us was a priest rooting for 'dem bums'. Along about the sixth inning, as Don Larsen worked his magic, my Dad leaned over and asked the priest if he was aware of what was happening out there. When the father nodded and shrugged my Dad said, and I remember it clearly," Father, we could use all the help we can get here, think you might switch sides for a couple more innings?".
Apparently that happened and I got to see my only perfect game ever! I still have the ticket stubs, framed in my den!
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
The only way Israel and Palestine will stop fighting is if they are seperated by a policeable, defendable, no-person-land (PC?).
It is necessary for the UN, Israel & the US, Japan, etc. to purchase a tract of sand/land in one of the surrounding countries and turn it a state-of-the-art country with water desalination, solar power and light rail system to a number of the Arab countries and Jerusalem.
The "host" country that sells Palestine it's land would instantly become a major player in world politics.
All Palestinians would be resettled there, with homes, apartments, everything they need to survive in peace and moderate well-being. It would cost a fraction of what is being spent on terrorism and the military and cut off direct access to Israel by any die-hards. It would not have to be that large - perhaps the size of London or LA - a small country.
It is the only way, short of world war 3 that the situation will ever be solved.
Traveler
traveler said:
"The only way Israel and Palestine will stop fighting is if they are seperated by a policeable, defendable, no-person-land."
What do you think Israel is doing by turning southern Lebanon into a cluster bomb mine field in 2006? If they aren't able to annex Gaza during this offensive, I would gamble that they will leave a cluster bomb barrier behind as they pull out...
It would be part of the economic warfare Israel is waging against Gaza...If they can't "Nuetralise" Gaza leadership, Israel will make sure Gaza farmers can't use open land to grow food for the people.
Its the right action but Jewish groups are probably going to have to lead the way.
I really dont expect many celebrities to come forward to endorse it however. Too many high level zionist supporters in Entertainment business.
Its a difficult hill to climb due to the money and power involved, and the Holocaust Industry.
I think Israelis like comfort and leisure, and being invited to foreign universities,
and divestment would make them very uncomfortable.
But they could be stubborn for a long time before seeing the light.
Buying land in an arab country makes no sense.
If French were driven out by French canadian migrants, would it make sense to have them relocate to Spain or Belgium and make a country there?
make the European Jewish settlers in palestine give up the dream of an an artificially jewish majority and things will be better--but having a UN police to protect the palestinian arabs from Israel is a good idea. Palestinians have been in favor of it for a long time-but not Israel obviously.
What do you mean by "Holocaust Industry"?
Adapted from JFK's address to the nation on civil rights, June 11, 1963:
"We are confronted primarily with a moral issue. It is as old as the scriptures and is as clear as the UN Deeclaration of Human Rights.
The heart of the question is whether all dwellers in Israel and Palestine are to be afforded equal rights and equal opportunities, whether Israel is going to treat all the citizens and those who live in territories under its control as they would want to be treated.
If a Palestinian, because his faith language, or customs, are different, cannot come and go as they please, or use any facilities or institutionhs intended for the public, if his children cannot be properly fed or educated, if he cannot vote for the public officials who represent him, if, in short, he cannot enjoy the full and free life which all of us want, then who among us would be content to stand in his place? Who among us would then be content with the counsels of patience and delay?
Sixty years of delay have passed since the establishmednt of the State of Isreal, Forty-one since they siezed territories that are not a part of their country, The UN did not create the nation of Israel in order to allow them to persecute the original dwellers in that land which they now occupy. Yet the Palestinian people not fully free. They are not yet freed from the bonds of injustice. They are not yet freed from social and economic oppression. And the nation of Israel, for all its hopes and all its boasts, will not be fully free until all its citizens as well as those who live in territories under its control are free."
***************
We have faced these issues before--the question before us is whether we will have the courage to face them again.
Poet
As demonstrated elsewhere on this site, the UN did NOT "create the nation of Israel." What exists in Palestine is a terrorist enclave named Israel, whose existence is assured by more powerful states for reasons related to their own Imperialistic policies.
I had never heard of this speech before. Thank you for posting. Lends credence to the conspiracy theory of Mossad/Jewish mafia involvement in JFK assassination.
Not so fast! This was AN ADAPTATION of JFK's famous address on civil rights given 06-11-63. To read (or watch a video of) the original on which this adaptation was based go to:
http://millercenter.org/scripps/archive/speeches/detail/3375
The purpose of the adaptation (besides showing the similarity of current US foreign policy to its racial politics 45 years ago, was to show that as we have been able to rise above small minded bigotry in the past, we should be able to do so yet again.
By the way, it wasn't Mossad that killed JFK. It was the national security state establishment (the alphabet soup of Intel and military organizations) and LBJ, J Edgar Hoover, (they were neighbors in DC), and the secret service who have covered and are still covering up the bare naked truth about the assassination lo these many years later.
Poet
Poet:it's poetic and very far out. I was in NOLA when Jim Garrison was doing his investigative work. I read the newspapers.
Poet:Are you saying Israel's government killed JFK?
To boycott Israeli products one has to know what they are. In a supermarket there may be one soup packet labeled BING and another labeled BONG; BING might be Israeli (or even a settler colony) but the packet only names the local distributor, or it might be BONG. There needs to be a web page where one can ask if a product is from Israel or not. This would do much to increase the communication that Klein describes.
JohnE; Primarily Israeli exports are 1. Cut Diamonds 2. Hi-Tech Equipment. 3. Chemicals and 4. Plastics. Evidently we could bring Israel to it's knees if we quit buying diamonds-Google Israel Exports....A 40% drop in diamond prices largely helped drop Israel's 4th quarter GDP 20%.
I did not know they had so many Diamond Mines in Israel.
.In fact they do not have diamond mines. The art of diamond cutting is a traditional orthodox Jewish skill set, passed from father to son even today. If you were to go to the NYC diamond center you would see many Hassidic Jews working there in this endeavor.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
A boycott of Kosher products would go a lot further than boycotting Israeil products. Look for the symbol. There are several, this among the more prominent:
http://www.okkosher.com
A boycott cannot be truly effective, as a friend astutely reminded me, unless all arms dealers, gangsters and small states AND the US (a prime market for Israeli military technology) are on board. True, massive commercial losses from such items as fruit, flowers, make-up, candy, chocolate bars, clothing, and especially tourism will make a dent. (As someone here pointed out, many commercial brands are disguised.)
But the real meat of Israel's economy is in the weapons and military technology industry and in the hiring out of military and security "consultants" and "advisors" (mercenaries and paramilitary trainers), as well as in tourism (mainly by Jews, who are for the most part knee-jerk supporters of "Eretz Israel right or wrong", and Christians, predominantly the masses of evangelical types). Both line items are big fat cash cows and it will be very hard, probably impossible, to wean much of the world from them.
Moreover, Israel has well-placed advocates in foreign governments, media and financial sectors around the world, who do not allow dissent and who play influential roles.
To head off my critics: I'm not blithely repeating the shibboleth about "Jewish-owned media", although the Aspers in Canada do a good job with their near-monopoly and many high-profile media personalities in the U.S. certainly keep a tight rein on criticism of Israel; nor am I echoing the Nazi paranoia about the "conspiracy of international Jewish bankers", although the likes of Mr. Madoff and Mr. Greenspan are pretty hefty pillars of the financial community and coincidentally do not appear to line up with progressive Jews against the excesses of the Jewish State.
I only wish to invite people to be realistic and practical.
Divestment, yes. And progressive Jews of the Diaspora need to move the debate into the synagogues and the Jewish charity organizations, front and centre, so these institutions are no longer automatically the channels they've been for pro-Israel propaganda and indoctrination. Progressive Jews now have to find the courage to challenge and confront their peers within congregations and associations, and not limit themselves to the safety of like-minded groups at demonstrations or on line. This is, I think, where the tough work needs to be done, because the politicians and the military establishment in Israel (one and the same, really) have always taken the Diaspora communities for granted, to keep on sending money (Israel bonds, etc.) and to keep on parroting the official line.
The Jewish nation has become a dysfunctional family, no different from the imperialist U.S. or the Catholic Church. We must confront the source of the dysfunctionality, which is the militarized state and the hubris and hypocrisy of its rulers and their enablers. At the same time we need to counter the shameless Holocaust industry and the exploitation of a very real anti-semitism, which is going to come back to bite all Jews in a big way as Israel's despicable actions continue to be identified with Jews worldwide. None of us want community centres, places of worship, or non-combatants (religious children in the streets of France or Argentina or India, Israel or Iran) to become targets of extremists, yet Israeli policies are increasing the vulnerability of those civilian sectors.
So it's up to us Jews to "clean house" and be leaders in setting Israel on a more righteous path.
Well articulated Hoodeet !
Can you explain what the "Holocaust Industry" is for me?