Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Fight Against Fracking
When politicians refer to natural gas as a "clean" alternative to oil and coal, they seldom mention a commonly used technique called horizontal hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking.
But in New York, residents were concerned enough about the long-term environmental, health, and economic fallout of fracking that they convinced the state Senate to institute a moratorium on the practice. In a 48-9 bipartisan landslide, state leaders voted to prohibit fracking for nine months so they can evaluate the environmental and health impacts of the practice before deciding how to continue.
"It was absolutely the result of thousands of citizens weighing in with their senators,” said Katherine Nadeau, director of the Water and Natural Resources Program for Environmental Advocates of New York. “When that many people call, write, and show up, it gets results. The other side was spending obscene amounts of money, but the more compelling argument was that there have been serious tragic repercussions to drilling."
Those repercussions have included fatalities from exploding wells, 30-mile stretches of streams without any living organisms, exploding tap water, diesel fuel spills, sick children and adults, plummeting property values, farmland that is no longer tillable, the destruction of vast swaths of once-beautiful scenery, along with many other documented cases of harm to people and the planet.
Fracking involves blasting through shale rock to release the gas trapped deep below ground. Each fracked well uses between 3 and 8 million gallons of clean water—usually trucked in from rivers, streams, ponds, lakes, and other fresh-water sources—that is then mixed with sand and a toxic stew of chemicals that drilling companies are not required to disclose. But Theo Colborn, a noted endocrinologist and water issues expert, has identified many of them as carcinogins, neurotoxins, and endocrine disruptors. They include acrylonitrite, ammonium bisulfite, benzene, boric acid, ethylbenzene, 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazotin-3-one, formaldehyde, monoethanolamine, styrene, tetrachlorethalene, toluene, and xylene.
Much of the waste fluid is left underground, where these toxins have affected groundwater drinking supplies in many states.
First-Time Activists in “A Fight for Our Lives”
Many fighting this battle had never before been involved in political issues. But after seeing the impacts of fracking around the country or in their own daily lives, they got active.
They organized and attended forums, panels, meetings, and rallies—sometimes alongside public figures like actor Mark Ruffalo and singer-songwriter Pete Seeger. Day after day, thousands of people called state senate and assembly offices to pressure for the moratorium. Achieving it was a first-round victory beyond expectations—a small but important win.
With their air, water, land, properties, communities, and health on the line, residents have made the campaign a priority, often sacrificing family time, leisure time, and sleep to keep abreast of developments and share information. "The petrochemical-industrial complex is stealing our land and our health," said New York resident and architect Joe Levine. "Life as we know it will change forever if we don’t stop them."
Levine lives has a home near the New York State border in Damascus, Pennsylvania, with his wife, Jane Cyphers, and their two daughters. The family has turned over their lives to this issue since they were first approached by gas companies wanting to lease their land . They soon realized that their beloved Delaware River would be imperiled by drilling. Levine cofounded Damascus Citizens, a grassroots group made up of people who are fighting to keep the Delaware safe from fracking. Their influence, and the experiences of the town of Dimock, Pennyslvania, inspired Josh Fox to make the documentary Gasland.
Sullivan County, New York, resident Larysa Dyrszka, a retired pediatrician, has also taken on the role of state-level activist for the first time.
"Nobody thought drilling would really come here, to a populated area, with technology that couldn't ensure against harmful effects to our drinking water and health," says Dyrszka. "Little did we know it was already happening in Texas and Colorado and in other populated areas."
Together with her friends and neighbors, Dyrszka started SACRED—Sullivan Area Citizens for Responsible Energy Development. On January 25, Dyrszka joined hundreds of New Yorkers from all corners of the state to lobby their representatives in Albany—many, like Dyrszka, for the first time.
"I was hooked," Dyrszka says. "Now, whenever Roger [Downs, of the Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter] or Katharine [Nadeau, of EANY] or any fellow foot-soldier groups suggest a lobby day, I’m there."
For months, Dyrszka and her fellow activists continued building relationships by phone, e-mail, and in person with legislative staff, sending them scientific, health, legal, economic, and other information on fracking.
New York’s Recipe for Success
Wes Gillingham is program director for Catskill Mountainkeeper. He was on the floor of the Senate all day August 3, waiting with Dyrszka and fellow activists until the bill finally came to a vote around midnight.
"I got two reports from Senate staffers later," he says. "One said that for every 3 to 10 calls they got against the moratorium, there were 100 for it. Another told me it was 80-to-1 in favor”—despite the fact that drilling companies funded a counter-campaign claiming that allowing fracking will bring riches to strapped upstate regions.
Timing also had something to do with the vote's outcome. "The Gulf spill and Gasland coming almost simultaneously got a lot more people aware of the carelessness of the gas and oil companies and what's happening with unconventional gas drilling,” says Kevin Millar, a retired nurse anesthetist from Tioga County who belongs to New York Residents Against Drilling and the Coalition to Protect New York.
Filmmaker Josh Fox brought his award-winning Gasland to many New York cinemas in early summer. Fox, who'd traveled to 24 states to document the heartbreaking human stories behind the industry hype about a "safe, clean fuel," has appeared on the Daily Show with Jon Stewart, Fresh Air with Terry Gross, and other national shows. Gasland has been showing on HBO since debuting there in June. Its scene of a man lighting the water coming from his kitchen tap on fire has become iconic of fracking's dangers to drinking water. Everywhere it shows, more people join the antifracking movement.
In September, the New York Assembly will vote a similar moratorium bill. Activists are working to ensure it gets to the floor for a vote. Another focus is on educating outgoing Governor David Paterson, whom they expect to sign the moratorium bills (he had threatened to veto, but that's now unlikely, given the huge majority Senate passage).
The incoming governor will be the focus of attention post-election. Green Party candidate Howie Hawkins has called for a total ban on the practice. Democrat Andrew Cuomo and Republican Rick Lazio say they are in favor of "safe" drilling. Activists are already showing up at Cuomo's statewide rallies to let him know that fracking isn’t safe.
Antifracking advocates believe their multifaceted approach—based on educating themselves, the public, and legislators—will work. They're optimistic that their concerns about their health, homes, and drinking water won’t be ignored.
"Cooperation from around the state made us succeed in the Senate," says Dyrszka. "None of us are being paid. Nobody's offering us money, now or in the future. We're just fighting for our lives, and that 's why we're winning these little battles."
- Posted in

13 Comments so far
Show AllLooks like the citizens chalked up a small victory. Would that there were more and lasted longer than a few months.
I know that this fracking process is used in engineering enhanced geothermal energy but I am not clear about the level of ecological damage it causes as compared with natural gas. My incomplete research tells me it isn't as bad but I can't get a good handle on how bad it is. Does anyone have more details and a context to put those details in?
4thefuture: If you have access to HBO, they are currently still showing the Josh Fox documentary, Gasland. Fox didn't know much about the fracking process, either. One day, he received a letter and a contract in the mail -- a company that uses the fracking process wanted access to his land. As I recall, Fox lives in Eastern Pennsylvania. His research took him on a trip across the country, and he documented the health effects, and the ecological damage done by fracking as he traveled. The story is horrifying.
Here's a link to a Democracy Now! interview (if you search their site, you might find additional info) with Josh Fox:
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/2/23/congress_to_investigate_safety_of_natural
Thanks, Kay, for the suggestion but I don't subscribe to cable so no HBO for me. And it sounds like Fox's documentary is about the natural gas fracking issue which I am more aware of (and I'll try to see on DVD) than the geothermal fracking which was what I was asking about. So that is still an open question. I'd like to think that geothermal is a viable and non-ecologically damaging source of energy even when engineeringly enhanced or whatever, but when we look back at the taking, for fuel, of crops and cropland that could have been used for food, hydroelectric which destroys ecosystems of rivers, then I think it's important to understand what the known downsides are of alternative energy sources being proposed.
the pollution from the fracking comes from the chemical additives in the frack fluid, and the oily (and often mildly radioactive) brines that occur in the gas-bearing formation. I assume that geothermal fracking is in igneous or metamorphic rock, so there are little or no hydrocarbons, I assume the fracking fluids and fracking pressures are similar. Discovering groundwater contamination of the frack fluid in geothermal situations will be more difficult since there are no hydrocarbons which affect the water's taste in very small concentrations.
I think that a permanent ban on fracking is not realistic. We are having trouble enough just replacing existing electric demand with renewables. The renewable electric generation needed to replace the vast amounts of gas used for heating every winter would be impossible.
However there are methods to prevent releases, even if some are expensive. For absolute starters, every gas well should have four, regularly sampled, groundwater monitoring wells drilled at each corner of the well site.
A crash research project - run by the state DEP's but funded by the gas developers, need to be done to determine the paths of the contamination. If the source of the contamination is via failure of the cement in well annulus, different well construction methods need to be used. For example, gravel leak-interception zones can be incorporated into the annulus
Absolutely no waste fluid dumping - including at regular wastewater plants should be allowed. All frack fluids must be treated at specialized facilities and re-used.
All the other disruptive effects of the development - the access roads, pipelines and noisy compressor stations need to be addressed as well.
Yes, I am willing to pay more for heating my house.
There is always a downside to every technological fix and the questions are always, how deep, how steep and who will get stuck with the bills when they come due and how soon.
It's simply a corollary to the fact that there is no real way to get rich quick without screwing or ripping somebody off.
New York city has a drinking water system that most large cities around the world would kill for. Fresh clean water comes down from upstate NY and needs little to no treatment. I really hope they know an appreciate what they have before they loose it all due to pollution from fracking.
Fracking is happening as we speak right across the breadth of Northern Canada. There little opposition to it or protests against it because the regions sparsely populated.
This speaks to an underlying problem in the makeup of man. Why is it only an issue when it affects Human beings?
It is very much like the opposition to war in the USA only growing when the Citizens suffer personally. What happens to the peoples of the nations attacked is of little relevance.
Is there really such a thing as safe drilling? Is renewable energy really that hard? When paying the near permanent, ongoing real costs of carbon emissions, and the costs of the fracking of land, renewable energy is a ongoing profits bonanza. The sun is not going to run out real soon. One hundred percent renewable energy sources is doable now. There is no excuse for abandoning fossil fuels, except suicidal stupidity.
The gas, coal and oil Industries are made up of the most reactionary assholes around. They're greedy and they're evil. They'll do whatever it takes to get what they want and they leave their messes to everyone else to live with and clean up.
They don't call them "oil-field trash" for nothing.
This, on top of everything else. What a country.
They say a little formaldehyde adds an interesting ambiance to that first cup of coffee in the morning.
Brilliant article, Ms. Stephens. Well done, well-researched. Please keep on writing about this very critical subject; the entire environment depends on people like you.