EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- The Downwinders: Fracking Ourselves to Death in America
Popular content
Today's Top News
Afghan Woman Knows Why US Policy is Failing
OSLO -- The debate about the Obama administration's plan to surge more than 20,000 additional troops into Afghanistan has been so vapid that you will still hear suggestions that this approach is necessary to protect the people -- particularly the women -- of Afghanistan from oppression.
Those who argue this brief would be well to consult Malalai Joya. Selected to serve in Afghanistan's Constitutional Loya Jirga in 2003 and then elected to the Wolesi Jirga (parliament) in 2005 as one of the top vote-getters in the western province of Farah, she is widely seen as the most courageous political figure in the country. This is because, from the start, she has dared to object to the crude political calculus -- imposed and supported by the U.S. -- which grants amnesty to warlords who have been linked to well-documented war crimes and ongoing corruption.
Joya has also sought -- sadly, without success -- to block the restoration by the U.S.-backed Afghan government of laws restricting the legal rights of women. And she has complained, loudly and consistently, about U.S. bombing raids that are responsible for horrifying death tolls among civilians.
For her dissents, the youngest member of the parliament has been banned from the Jirga, threatened with rape by fellow legislators, and hounded by violent groups and individuals closely tied to the ruling establishment. She must move from house to house in Kabul and requires constant protection. Even when she travels abroad, she is in danger.
Yet Joya continues to speak out, as she did last Wednesday at the opening ceremony of the Global Forum on Freedom of Expression, where we were both among the speakers.
Despite six years of U.S. presence, Joya says, "In Afghanistan, religious extremism controls the society ... human rights and democracy are omitted."
Joya's message is blunt and uncompromising.
"Billions of dollars spent in our country only make the warlords and the abusers of human rights more powerful," she says.
Joya is withering in her criticism of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who she dismissed as "the choice of the White House" and "another puppet" who fails to seriously challenge violent warlords at home or the failed policies of foreign countries that provide military and political support to some of the worst players in the country.
As a result, she says, "There are no human rights or democracy in Afghanistan because (the government) is infected with fundamentalism."
This remarkable woman, who pleads the cause of liberal democracy, pluralism and women's rights in her homeland with a passion that is as inspiring as it is well-reasoned, has received support and encouragement from six women Nobel Peace laureates. Shirin Ebadi, Mairead Maguire, Rigoberta Menchum, Betty Williams, Jody Williams and Wangari Maathai -- who joined us at the Oslo conference -- have issued a joint appeal for Joya's reinstatement in the parliament.
The Global Forum on Freedom of Expression was sponsored by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the foreign ministries of Norway and Finland and the Open Society Institute, among others, and a wide range of international human rights and free speech groupings. The conference highlighted dissident voices that should be heard.
In truth, Joya is heard in much of the world.
But she is not heard enough in the United States, and that is a dangerous disconnect.
It is true that the mess of U.S. policy in Afghanistan was stirred up by George Bush and Dick Cheney, in collaboration, it should be noted, with many Democrats who adopted the fantasy that the Afghan conflict was America's "good war" -- in contrast to the "bad war" in Iraq. The ethical and logical compromises of the Bush/Cheney era created a situation where, Joya explains, "In our country, to express your point of view is to risk violence and death."
But President Barack Obama's expansion of a misguided occupation will ultimately give him ownership of the mess.
Obama's instincts may be noble. But to surge more troops into Afghanistan without a plan, and without taking serious steps to address the failures of the occupation up to this point, is folly.
There is no question that the United States has profound responsibilities to the people of Afghanistan. But those responsibilities are not met by maintaining flawed policies of empowering extreme fundamentalists, supporting corrupt warlords and inept politicians, and encouraging a circumstance where one of the most worldly members of the country's parliament says that "there are no human rights or democracy in Afghanistan."
Obama and his advisers should listen to Malalai Joya before they presume that expanding the occupation along the lines established by the Bush administration -- or, frankly, along any lines -- is going to help the great mass of people in Afghanistan.
The same goes for members of Congress -- especially those who say they are concerned about the women of Afghanistan -- who, for the most part, have gone along with the Bush and Obama administrations rather than asking the right questions or mounting the necessary dissents.
There is much that can be done to help Afghanistan repair itself. There are smart aid and development initiatives -- many of them grass-roots based -- that can expand access to education for women and girls and that can build respect for human rights and democracy. But an occupation that serves the interests of the occupiers rather than the people of Afghanistan has created what Malalai Joya refers to as "a mafia state."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


36 Comments so far
Show AllSo since the fight to get AQ got old, it was the fight to get the Taliban. When that got old, it was for democracy. When that was debunked it is the fight for woman's right.
Why doesn't the US just say that they are there to control the natural resources there.And to perpetuate wars in that region to enrich the MIC.
Good Question.
We are supposed to be the govment so maybe you just gave the answer in a way.
Isn't it weird that readers can't use html of any kind here?
No links!
Don't let the "little people" of the internet get uppity!
YOU WILL READ WHAT WE TELL YOU TO READ!!!
Lina Newhouser was the soul of CommonDreams, and when she died, what's-his-face turned it into a cash-cow.
Don't let those radical reader-commenters scare away the contributors!
They just recently removed the funcitonality of simple formatting tags like the <OL> and <UL>too.
I suppose I can live with it, but I don't see the benefit of stopping visual formatting.
"Obama's instincts may be noble."
This is how obvious they are over at "The Nation".
If it was Bush expanding the front into Afghanistan-Pakistan, do you suppose that Nichols would be characterizing it as "noble"?
The debate about the Obama administration's plan to surge more than 20,000 additional troops into Afghanistan has been so vapid that you will still hear suggestions that this approach is necessary to protect the people -- particularly the women -- of Afghanistan from oppression.
If Bill Hicks were still alive, he could riff on this theme forever. That's how absurd the whole notion is.
More and more one hears the echos of the past. The USSR said many similar things to what the yank occupiers now say when the USSR invaded Afghanistan. I can only hope that when the usa collapses it goes the way the USSR did, quitely and with a whimper, not a series of bangs.
Seems inevitable that the US will eventually collapse. It's pillars are already starting to crumble.
Obama knows deep in his sincere heart that the Afghan women rather wear a veil of white phospherous than a burqa.
yeah. death is liberation, too.
"Billions of dollars spent in our country only make the warlords and the abusers of human rights more powerful," she says.
- those billions of dollars also have contributed to a flourishing trade in opium poppies.
"But to surge more troops into Afghanistan without a plan, and without taking serious steps to address the failures of the occupation up to this point, is folly."
- time to double up and find a real fascist general who understands how to undermine popular resistance movements (death squad style). oh, we just did that..... nevermind.
...peace...
My curse on the Muslim world is that strong women will take over all their lands and Muslim men will get what's coming to them. That is, they will have to live in a world where women are equal in every way to men. What a nightmare for idiots expecting to go to a paradise where beautiful women will wait on them hand and foot. If I'm getting it wrong, please enlighten me, men of Islam.
The primary injustice is USA imperialism not Muslim chauvinism.
USA women only got the right to vote around 1920 and Native Americans not until 1940's in some states.
And some people are still attempting to control reproductive rights.
In my little city one pregnant women was murdered by her husband and another pregnant women brutally beaten by her husband in the past week.
Not until women are safe in the USA will you have any higher ground on Muslim treatment of women.
USA citizens are often great blind hyprocrites.
I have several questions for you:
if an American male believes that a women's place is as a maid, a sex toy, and a breeder, do you then take the view that all American males believe that?
If a UK male takes advantage of a Muslim country's, Dubai, laws to have his UK wife jailed for adultery, while they were there, do you then believe that ALL UK males are this kind of disgusting scum?
Do you lump in countries like Sweden, where women are much more equal, with countries like the US, where women are much less equal, because both are western countries?
Painting with such a broad brush doesn't help women's rights. Whether Muslim or not. It just weakens your argument.
George Markley: your heart is in the right place regarding women, but rfloh has helped me see the flawed logic in your( and to an extent my) thinking. Let's not fight amongst ourselves, but use these opportunities to build solidarity ( and better talking points) Peace.
My heart IS in the right place. I do tend to generalize a lot though. I just get so mad when I see women put down and I am so encouraged when I see them fighting back. My little sister was abused, first through an Army rape, then through a husband who was a child molester and predator. What there was of her self image was destroyed. I've seen her, over these last 15 years, pull herself together, raise two boys, learn to take care of herself, and I'm so proud of her. When testosterone gets the best of me and I bully her, she comes right back at me and reminds me to look at myself.
I'm using the brushes, paints and canvas give to me by the press, even CD. I once worked with an Iranian expatriate who took me to his home one afternoon for lunch. His wife seemed very happy, working in the kitchen and serving but not eating with us. I was given to understand that this man was amongst the enlightened Muslims. Pardon me if I generalize, but I think Muslims have a lot of catching up to do.
Women in, yes, even the United States are free to fight for what we jokingly call liberty, and are not thwarted by Bible thumping 'scum', at least by law. Who cares what American males think? If a woman lets a man make her into a sex toy, a maid, or a breeder, she has recourse by law and should put that man firmly in his place.
I applaud those women in places like Afghanistan who are fighting for equality.
Oh, and I don't lump the US with Sweden in any way.
I like this lady who wields a vocal big hammer and hits that nail right on the head and more guts than me.Tony
Nichols writes:
"Joya's message is blunt and uncompromising."
Why not learn by example John?
where is MoveOn and CodePink when we need them? Oh yeah, our guy won!
Check out the CodePink website:
http://codepink4peace.org/blog/category/codepinkcampaigns/afghanistan-codepinkcampaigns/
for the great amount that they are doing about Afghanistan. They are resisting Obama in every way they can.
You keep repeating this rubbish. A simple visit to Code Pink's site will show clearly that they have not stopped talking about Iraq and Afghanistan. Which I'm sure you know. But, you're hoping that people will be too lazy to check.
Slip sliding away...
Slip sliding away...
You're no nearer your destination the more you're slip sliding away....
With apologies to Paul Simon
nichols was undoubtedly in heaven standing next to these brave women. when he should be ashamed.
how can someone as smart as nichols say that obama's plan in afghanistan is simply "misguided"?
despite all the idiocy on the right today, these obamabots are just insufferable. far worse, cuz they should know better.
As others have mentioned, the reasons we are in Afghanistan are being met. (the oil pipelines, strategic control etc)
Unfortunately for the people of Afghanistan, we are not there for their benefit, or for our benefit either, unless you are a member of the corporate elite, in which case you wouldn't be reading this website.
And how has commondreams let us down? Because they didn't publish articles that challenged the corporate democratic presidential platform last year and inform their readers that both Obama and Hillary were going to continue the unlawful occupation of the middle east for financial reasons.
Oh yeah, same for health care, corporate corruption etc
do it goes
www.NotOneMore.US
"And how has commondreams let us down? Because they didn't publish articles that challenged the corporate democratic presidential platform last year and inform their readers that both Obama and Hillary were going to continue the unlawful occupation of the middle east for financial reasons."
I totally agree.
A year ago or 18 months ago the "liberal" blogosphere could have opposed the con-man Obama and anything-to-get-elected Hillary Clinton, and now...
None of this noise on the blogs really matters, and Obama just laughs off anything to the left of Rush Limbaugh.
But it's probably useful for "leftists" to let off steam on the blogs...
Otherwise they might get out in the streets and actually cause a few problems for the con-man Obama and his Cabinet of gangsters from Goldman Sachs.
Sioux Rose
The plight of women in Afghanistan is beyond awful.
I wonder if Pentagon chiefs of staff show up at White House meetings and make plans the way Wallmart executives do. In both instances there is a pressing need to clear "inventory" to make way for new product lines.
If I sound cynical, who that's paying attention would not be at this time? The U.S has become a nation under Mars that's perpetually in search of new "theaters of war." How else to maintain demand for the next generation of weapons when the shelves would otherwise be full of those most recently purchased in lieu of investments in green technology, quality health care for all, better roads and bridges, and schools with smaller class sizes and more focus on learning than teaching for the generic tests.
It ceases to be a blunder when president after president seems to invent reasons to hang his name on one war, conflict or occupation or another. I'm sure to Obama it's pragmatism, they have to work with those who have power and authority and that explains why local womens' rights and lives are so casually sold-out. How much more obscene can it get then learning that U.S. operatives distributed Viagra to old tribal leaders so they could really leave an impression on their new 12 year old wives? (A female essentially sold to the old fart as some form of father to father collateral. Damage.)
the american people have seen this movie before in iraq only in afghanistan its oil & herion that the elite wish to exploit now under the guise of protecting afghan women & not to mention the senseless death of our men & women. thanks obama for takeing the reigns from george & dick & continueing their legacy of wars, lies, & deciet in the face of the american people.
I admire this brave women who speaks out and is not afraid to speak the truth. She is a woman of courage and strength.
"...amnesty to warlords who have been linked to well-documented war crimes and ongoing corruption."
Isn't that what Obama/Biden gave Bush/Cheney? Amnesty or is it amnesia.
Drop the women's-rights diversions with the building-the-school story.
It's all war crimes!!!!!!!!!!
I haven't yet read this article by John Nichols, but will add that the Rethink Afghanistan video posted at CD June 10th, so the same day as the above article, and related videos by Brave New Films (producer of the "Rethink Afghanistan" documentary) referred to by title in a post I added to RA's video page here (CD) should be viewed.
http://www.commondreams.org/video/2009/06/10-1
There's also the following video I viewed a few days ago and which is certainly very interesting.
"Anti-US feeling still high in Afghanistan - 05 Jun 09", (2:48), by AlJazeeraEnglish, Jun 5 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3XBfSCr7qE
"Obama and his advisers should"
Aren't we way past "dear leader should" by now? Are we going to be spectators or actors? We on the far-left have shifted gears to "the people should". Apparently, Nichols still finds willing spectators. He makes federal policy into yet another entertainment commodity to go with the ten thousand ice cream flavors.
Did someone think the U.S. invaded Afghanistan to bring "democracy and freedom" to that country?
US policy has failed in Afghanistan in the sense that Jack the Ripper and Jeffrey Daumer failed to entertain victims.
Malalai Joya is one of the greatest women in the world. also amazin. you should go watch her on youtube how she could stand up there in the Jurga nd yell at them (the northern alliance warlords) how can we have a government with you bums, rapists and murderers in here? and so on. that's why they threw her out.