Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Wikileaks vs. Stratfor: Pursue The Truth, Not Its Messenger
WikiLeaks, the whistle-blower website, has again published a massive trove of documents, this time from a private intelligence firm known as Stratfor. The source of the leak was the hacker group “Anonymous,” which took credit for obtaining more than 5 million emails from Stratfor’s servers. Anonymous obtained the material on Dec. 24, 2011, and provided it to WikiLeaks, which in turn partnered with 25 media organizations globally to analyze the emails and publish them.
Among the emails was a short one-liner that suggested the U.S. government has produced, through a secret grand jury, a sealed indictment against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. In addition to painting a picture of Stratfor as a runaway, rogue private intelligence firm with close ties to government-intelligence agencies serving both corporate and U.S. military clients, the emails support the growing awareness that the Obama administration, far from diverging from the secrecy of the Bush/Cheney era, is obsessed with secrecy, and is aggressively opposed to transparency.
Flickr / mar is sea Y (CC-BY-SA)
I traveled to London last Independence Day weekend to interview Assange. When I asked him about the grand-jury investigation, he responded: “There is no judge, there is no defense counsel, and there are four prosecutors. So, that is why people that are familiar with grand-jury inquiries in the United States say that a grand jury would not only indict a ham sandwich, it would indict the ham and the sandwich.”
As I left London, The Guardian newspaper exposed more of Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. phone-hacking scandal, which prompted the closing of his tabloid newspaper, the largest circulation Sunday newspaper in the U.K., News of the World. The coincidence is relevant, as News of the World reported anything but what its title claimed, focusing instead on salacious details of the private lives of celebrities, sensational crimes, and photos of scantily clad women. For this and his other endeavors, Murdoch amassed a reported personal fortune of $7.6 billion.
Meanwhile, Assange—who, like Murdoch, was born in Australia (Murdoch abandoned his nationality for U.S. citizenship in order to purchase more U.S. broadcast licenses)—had engaged in one of largest and most courageous acts of publishing in history by founding wikileaks.org, which allows people to safely and securely deliver documents using the Internet in ways that make it almost impossible to trace. He and his colleagues at WikiLeaks had published millions of leaked documents, most notably about the U.S. wars and occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan, and thousands of U.S. diplomatic cables, true “news of the world.” The Sydney Peace Foundation awarded Assange a gold medal for “exceptional courage and initiative in pursuit of human rights.” In contrast, the U.S. government targeted him, possibly under the Espionage Act. Murdoch is hailed as a pioneering newsman, while pundits on Murdoch-owned cable-television outlets openly call for Assange’s murder.
The Stratfor emails will be released over time, along with context provided by WikiLeaks’ media partners. Already revealed by the documents are the close, and potentially illegal, connections between Stratfor employees and government-intelligence and law-enforcement officials. Rolling Stone magazine reports that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security was monitoring Occupy Wall Street protests nationally, and the Texas Department of Public Safety has an undercover agent at Occupy Austin who was disclosing information to contacts at Stratfor. Stratfor also is hired by multinational corporations to glean “intelligence” about critics. Among companies using Stratfor were Dow Chemical, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and Coca-Cola.
Fred Burton, Stratfor’s vice president of intelligence, and a former head of counterintelligence at the U.S. State Department’s diplomatic corps, wrote in an email, “Not for Pub—We have a sealed indictment on Assange. Pls protect.” Burton and others at Stratfor showed intense interest in WikiLeaks starting in 2010, showing intense dislike for Assange personally. Burton wrote: “Assange is going to make a nice bride in prison. Screw the terrorist. He’ll be eating cat food forever.” Another Stratfor employee wanted Assange waterboarded.
Michael Ratner, legal adviser to Assange and WikiLeaks, told me, “The Obama administration has gone after six people under the Espionage Act. That’s more cases than happened since the Espionage Act was actually begun in 1917. ... What this is about is the United States wanting to suppress the truth.”
1917 is also the year when U.S. Sen. Hiram Johnson famously said, “The first casualty when war comes is truth.” The White House is holding a gala dinner this week, honoring Iraq War veterans. Bradley Manning is an Iraq War vet who won’t be there. He is being court-martialed, facing life in prison or possibly death, for allegedly releasing thousands of military and diplomatic documents to WikiLeaks revealing the casualties of war. President Barack Obama would better serve the country by also honoring Assange and Manning.
We should pursue the truth, not its messengers.
Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.


21 Comments so far
Show AllI nominate Manning and Assange for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Any seconders?
FYI, Manning has already been nominated, by members of the Icelandic parliament. Firedoglake is collecting signatures in support of the nomination.
real heroes????
now i feel really, really curious, 'reallycurious',
how do you define a "real" hero????
judging from his posts i would say that really curious aint that curious at all - that in itself is really curious aint it
maybe that's the gag
what's curious about both manning and assange is that the only government in the world that wants to try (and kill) them is good ole fascist amerika
and that aint curious at all
not really...
Absolutely!
Surely you jest?
Not because they don't deserve consideration. But because you expect that from the same committee whose head is the right winger, Thorbjorn Jagland, who gave Obama the Nobel Peace Prize; Obama who has continued to wage wars. Then he gave it to Liu of China; Liu, who in an interview in the 80's in Hong Kong said that the Chinese needed 300 years of colonilaism...
Manning and Assange deserve respect...and it won't come from this present Nobel Peace committee headed by Jagland, who in some political circles of Norway is known as Norway's 'George Bush'...
Obama listens to Wall Street and will listen to Amy about as much as he will listen to you and I.
you know, i think that assange, himself would want us to "Honor The Truth, above Its Messenger." he would, i infer, be delighted if All become heroes for Truth and Peace.
both he and manning, as well as the entire democracy now! production staff, risk so much in the name of openness and Truth. by the way, amy, we're so proud of sharif abdel kouddous!
what a grand world this could be should Truth be the behavioral norm and not the "outstanding" exception set upon the pedestal to admire from afar.
" We should pursue the truth". Except that does not apply to 911 truth!
There is a reason why the Greek myth of Kassandra is still quite apt.
I tend to agree with you paperclipper. And this isn't the only issue that is treated this way. It has to do with two basic premises IMO.
One is that they really do believe the official story because to think other than this is too outside their own mental box. The other is that of being ridiculed and seen as way too fringe by a majority of those whose opinions matter to themselves.
It is not unlike many political assasinations that have occurred in our recent history, just as an example. "Conspiracy" is a word that is simply unacceptable for some reason. Iran Contra...What was that if not a conspiracy? How about Watergate? It seems that we are only allowed to use that word under certain circumstances.
And we have to choose between Obama and a Republican nominee. My God! What a choice!
Jim Shea
Your TV wants you to believe you have no choice, but you do. Rocky Anderson is running, the Green Party has multiple nominees. You can exercise your right to write-in someone if there are no acceptable candidates on your ballot. I've half a mind to write-in my neighbor's yappy shitzu. If he won, the State of the Union Address would be less vomitous to listen to at least.
Occupy your ballot!
Interpol arrested 26 alleged members of Anonymous
Without truth, you have no "news". Just a bunch of worthless ramblings about who said this or that and their "opinions". I could care less about some news persons opinion. Just give me the FACTS. I have a brain. I can decipher what the facts present. they have hidden the truth from us re: 9/11 because they were all paid billions to shut up. There were people at high levels of this government that know the truth. Why don't we start waterboarding them! Get to the truth. Silence is usually a coverup. Exposure is usually the truth!
Americans need to stand up against the illegal stripping of our rights in this country. Who are those that want to take it away and why? If they are not for America and cleaning out the cesspool in DC, we need to have a changing of the guard. Our government has been covering up the truth for 100 years!
There would be no controversy about 911 if we were told the truth. It is the lack of transparency that produces conspiracy theories and the 911 story is full of holes, holes that could have been filled by government agencies in the know. Why for instance did GW Bush fight to prevent the formation of a commission on the tragedy? Why did he only agree to be questioned by the commission if he had Cheney with him? Does this not give rise to even more questions? I simply will not believe that 19 mountain dwellers from a Saudi Arabia with box cutters defeated the combined intelligence and military agencies of the American government to pull off this little fiasco. Uh, uh, I may be gullible but I would have to be brain dead to believe that. So why do Americans believe it?
The truth behind 911 is neither relevant nor conducive to dialogue on Wikileaks, which WILL eventually bring out some of the truth about many things, including the backroom collusions amongst enemies to maintain war, and did 911. Those who do get the points made by 911TruthNow, can't really see the reason Amy won't cover it YET. Be patient, do your own research, and stop relying on others to regurgitate the news to you. Go read some of the 5 millions leaks and help filter the shit that is hitting the fan.
The government should "pursue the truth, not its messengers." It should not retaliate, destroy, carry out vendettas, cause premature heart attacks, strokes and suicides or in any other way try to kill its truthtelling messengers. Thomas Paine, THE RIGHTS OF MAN, wrote: "The mind, in discovering truths, acts in the same manner as it acts through the eye in discovering objects; when once any object has been seen, it is impossible to put the mind back to the same condition it was in before it saw it." As obsessed as the government is about suppressing the truth, Julian Assange and Bradley Manning are compelled to exposing the truth. This should be rewarded, not condemned. President Obama could present them with a "Profiles In Courage" award at this week's gala dinner. "The truth is America's most potent weapon. We cannot enlarge upon the truth. But we can and must intensify our efforts to make that truth more shining." (Richard Nixon.) Presidents know right from wrong; they have to have the courage to do the right - especially when it is the most difficult. By standing up for rightness and truth, presidents can be free of the burden of covering up and free of their guilt-ridden fears. The truth sets us free, and Bradley Manning and Julian Assange have been shining the light of truth for all of us to see. We need to be alert and pay attention.