EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Prisons, Drones, and Black Ops in Afghanistan
The Pentagon’s Afghan Basing Plans for Prisons, Drones, and Black Ops
In late December, the lot was just a big blank: a few burgundy metal shipping containers sitting in an expanse of crushed eggshell-colored gravel inside a razor-wire-topped fence. The American military in Afghanistan doesn’t want to talk about it, but one day soon, it will be a new hub for the American drone war in the Greater Middle East.
Soldiers pull a bobcat tractor out of the mud at their mountaintop position on September 2. (John Moore / Getty Images)
Next year, that empty lot will be a two-story concrete intelligence facility for America’s drone war, brightly lit and filled with powerful computers kept in climate-controlled comfort in a country where most of the population has no access to electricity. It will boast almost 7,000 square feet of offices, briefing and conference rooms, and a large “processing, exploitation, and dissemination” operations center -- and, of course, it will be built with American tax dollars.
Nor is it an anomaly. Despite all the talk of drawdowns and withdrawals, there has been a years-long building boom in Afghanistan that shows little sign of abating. In early 2010, the U.S.-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) had nearly 400 bases in Afghanistan. Today, Lieutenant Lauren Rago of ISAF public affairs tells TomDispatch, the number tops 450.
The hush-hush, high-tech, super-secure facility at the massive air base in Kandahar is just one of many building projects the U.S. military currently has planned or underway in Afghanistan. While some U.S. bases are indeed closing up shop or being transferred to the Afghan government, and there’s talk of combat operations slowing or ending next year, as well as a withdrawal of American combat forces from Afghanistan by 2014, the U.S. military is still preparing for a much longer haul at mega-bases like Kandahar and Bagram airfields. The same is true even of some smaller camps, forward operating bases (FOBs), and combat outposts (COPs) scattered through the country’s backlands. “Bagram is going through a significant transition during the next year to two years,” Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Gerdes of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Bagram Office recently told Freedom Builder, a Corps of Engineers publication. “We’re transitioning... into a long-term, five-year, 10-year vision for the base.”
Whether the U.S. military will still be in Afghanistan in five or 10 years remains to be seen, but steps are currently being taken to make that possible. U.S. military publications, plans and schematics, contracting documents, and other official data examined by TomDispatch catalog hundreds of construction projects worth billions of dollars slated to begin, continue, or conclude in 2012.
While many of these efforts are geared toward structures for Afghan forces or civilian institutions, a considerable number involve U.S. facilities, some of the most significant being dedicated to the ascendant forms of American warfare: drone operations and missions by elite special operations units. The available plans for most of these projects suggest durability. “The structures that are going in are concrete and mortar, rather than plywood and tent skins,” says Gerdes. As of last December, his office was involved in 30 Afghan construction projects for U.S. or international coalition partners worth almost $427 million.
The Big Base Build-Up
Recently, the New York Times reported that President Obama is likely to approve a plan to shift much of the U.S. effort in Afghanistan to special operations forces. These elite troops would then conduct kill/capture missions and train local troops well beyond 2014. Recent building efforts in the country bear this out.
A major project at Bagram Air Base, for instance, involves the construction of a special operations forces complex, a clandestine base within a base that will afford America’s black ops troops secrecy and near-absolute autonomy from other U.S. and coalition forces. Begun in 2010, the $29 million project is slated to be completed this May and join roughly 90 locations around the country where troops from Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force-Afghanistan have been stationed.
Elsewhere on Bagram, tens of millions of dollars are being spent on projects that are less sexy but no less integral to the war effort, like paving dirt roads and upgrading drainage systems on the mega-base. In January, the U.S. military awarded a $7 million contract to a Turkish construction company to build a 24,000-square-foot command-and-control facility. Plans are also in the works for a new operations center to support tactical fighter jet missions, a new flight-line fire station, as well as more lighting and other improvements to support the American air war.
Last month, Afghan President Hamid Karzai ordered that the U.S.-run prison at Bagram be transferred to Afghan control. By the end of January, the U.S. had issued a $36 million contract for the construction, within a year, of a new prison on the base. While details are sparse, plans for the detention center indicate a thoroughly modern, high-security facility complete with guard towers, advanced surveillance systems, administrative facilities, and the capacity to house about 2,000 prisoners.
At Kandahar Air Field, that new intelligence facility for the drone war will be joined by a similarly-sized structure devoted to administrative operations and maintenance tasks associated with robotic aerial missions. It will be able to accommodate as many as 180 personnel at a time. With an estimated combined price tag of up to $5 million, both buildings will be integral to Air Force and possibly CIA operations involving both the MQ-1 Predator drone and its more advanced and more heavily-armed progeny, the MQ-9 Reaper.
The military is keeping information about these drone facilities under extraordinarily tight wraps. They refused to answer questions about whether, for instance, the construction of these new centers for robotic warfare are in any way related to the loss of Shamsi Air Base in neighboring Pakistan as a drone operations center, or if they signal efforts to increase the tempo of drone missions in the years ahead. The International Joint Command’s chief of Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) operations, aware that such questions were to be posed, backed out of a planned interview with TomDispatch.
“Unfortunately our ISR chief here in the International Joint Command is going to be unable to address your questions,” Lieutenant Ryan Welsh of ISAF Joint Command Media Outreach explained by email just days before the scheduled interview. He also made it clear that any question involving drone operations in Pakistan was off limits. “The issues that you raise are outside the scope under which the IJC operates, therefore we are unable to facilitate this interview request.”
Whether the construction at Kandahar is designed to free up facilities elsewhere for CIA drone operations across the border in Pakistan or is related only to missions within Afghanistan, it strongly suggests a ramping up of unmanned operations. It is, however, just one facet of the ongoing construction at the air field. This month, a $26 million project to build 11 new structures devoted to tactical vehicle maintenance at Kandahar is scheduled for completion. With two large buildings for upkeep and repairs, one devoted strictly to fixing tires, another to painting vehicles, as well as an industrial-sized car wash, and administrative and storage facilities, the big base’s building boom shows no sign of flickering out.
Construction and Reconstruction
This year, at Herat Air Base in the province of the same name bordering Turkmenistan and Iran, the U.S. is slated to begin a multimillion-dollar project to enhance its special forces’ air operations. Plans are in the works to expand apron space -- where aircraft can be parked, serviced, and loaded or unloaded -- for helicopters and airplanes, as well as to build new taxiways and aircraft shelters.
That project is just one of nearly 130, cumulatively valued at about $1.5 billion, slated to be carried out in Herat, Helmand, and Kandahar provinces this year, according to Army Corps of Engineers documents examined by TomDispatch. These also include efforts at Camp Tombstone and Camp Dwyer, both in Helmand Province as well as Kandahar’s FOB Hadrian and FOB Wilson. The U.S. military also recently awarded a contract for more air field apron space at a base in Kunduz, a new secure entrance and new roads for FOB Delaram II, and new utilities and roads at FOB Shank, while the Marines recently built a new chapel at Camp Bastion.
Seven years ago, Forward Operating Base Sweeney, located a mile up in a mountain range in Zabul Province, was a well-outfitted, if remote, American base. After U.S. troops abandoned it, however, the base fell into disrepair. Last month, American troops returned in force and began rebuilding the outpost, constructing everything from new troop housing to a new storage facility. “We built a lot of buildings, we put up a lot of tents, we filled a lot of sandbags, and we increased our force protection significantly,” Captain Joe Mickley, commanding officer of the soldiers taking up residence at the base, told a military reporter.
Decommission and Deconstruction
Hesco barriers are, in essence, big bags of dirt. Up to seven feet tall, made of canvas and heavy gauge wire mesh, they form protective walls around U.S. outposts all over Afghanistan. They’ll take the worst of sniper rounds, rifle-propelled grenades, even mortar shells, but one thing can absolutely wreck them -- the Marines’ 9th Engineer Support Battalion.
At the beginning of December, the 9th Engineers were building bases and filling up Hescos in Helmand Province. By the end of the month, they were tearing others down.
Wielding pickaxes, shovels, bolt-cutters, powerful rescue saws, and front-end loaders, they have begun “demilitarizing” bases, cutting countless Hescos -- which cost $700 or more a pop -- into heaps of jagged scrap metal and bulldozing berms in advance of the announced American withdrawal from Afghanistan. At Firebase Saenz, for example, Marines were bathed in a sea of crimson sparks as they sawed their way through the metal mesh and let the dirt spill out, leaving a country already haunted by the ghosts of British and Russian bases with yet another defunct foreign outpost. After Saenz, it was on to another patrol base slated for destruction.
Not all rural outposts are being torn down, however. Some are being handed over to the Afghan Army or police. And new facilities are now being built for the indigenous forces at an increasing rate. “If current projections remain accurate, we will award 18 contracts in February,” Bonnie Perry, the head of contracting for the Army Corps of Engineers’ Afghanistan Engineering District-South, told military reporter Karla Marshall. “Next quarter we expect that awards will remain high, with the largest number of contract awards occurring in May.” One of the projects underway is a large base near Herat, which will include barracks, dining facilities, office space, and other amenities for Afghan commandos.
Tell Me How This Ends
No one should be surprised that the U.S. military is building up and tearing down bases at the same time, nor that much of the new construction is going on at mega-bases, while small outposts in the countryside are being abandoned. This is exactly what you would expect of an occupation force looking to scale back its “footprint” and end major combat operations while maintaining an on-going presence in Afghanistan. Given the U.S. military’s projected retreat to its giant bases and an increased reliance on kill/capture black-ops as well as unmanned air missions, it’s also no surprise that its signature projects for 2012 include a new special operations forces compound, clandestine drone facilities, and a brand new military prison.
There’s little doubt Bagram Air Base will exist in five or 10 years. Just who will be occupying it is, however, less clear. After all, in Iraq, the Obama administration negotiated for some way to station a significant military force -- 10,000 or more troops -- there beyond a withdrawal date that had been set in stone for years. While a token number of U.S. troops and a highly militarized State Department contingent remain there, the Iraqi government largely thwarted the American efforts -- and now, even the State Department presence is being halved.
It’s less likely this will be the case in Afghanistan, but it remains possible. Still, it’s clear that the military is building in that country as if an enduring American presence were a given. Whatever the outcome, vestiges of the current base-building boom will endure and become part of America’s Afghan legacy.
On Bagram’s grounds stands a distinctive structure called the “Crow’s Nest.” It’s an old control tower built by the Soviets to coordinate their military operations in Afghanistan. That foreign force left the country in 1989. The Soviet Union itself departed from the planet less than three years later. The tower remains.
America’s new prison in Bagram will undoubtedly remain, too. Just who the jailers will be and who will be locked inside five years or 10 years from now is, of course, unknown. But given the history -- marked by torture and deaths -- of the appalling treatment of inmates at Bagram and, more generally, of the brutality toward prisoners by all parties to the conflict over the years, in no scenario are the results likely to be pretty.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



20 Comments so far
Show AllTime to watch "She wore a yellow ribbon" again. John Wayne doing the Calvary thing against the Indians.
This is so dispiriting. These people-- not my people-- are simply incapable of getting the message. Have they ever read a book? Studied history? Thought of ways to avoid rather than engender war?
As this article indicates, it appears that the United States and its military bases will be in Afghanistan for some time to come. This then raises the question of why no [alleged] progressives in the Democratic party will be challenging Obama for the presidency in 2012. Or have the [alleged] progressives simply succumbed to party over principle?
Erroll, both sides have sold out to the MIC imo. No one will run against Obama because to get to the office, you have to be able to sell your soul.
The US long ago decided it gets to conquer the World for the corporations.
It has done countless coups for them.
It has propped up brutal dictators for them, until they change the rules. Then the US has to take them out.
TPTB decides who gets to play the puppet president.
The American votes are just too naive to understand our votes don't really count.
"....by elite special operations units. "
I really really wish the word "elite" was no longer used to describe soldiers. The word carries the implication of special privilege and the aura of superiority over the rest of us non-elites. It's one of many propaganda words. We who claim to be against the wars might consider avoiding the word altogether because militarism has tainted it.
Its use, even in antiwar articles, validates the very thing being criticized. It goes along with other emotionally affecting words such as honor, duty, collateral, free, freedom, democracy, and of course, last but not least, the very word "peace", which as used nowadays in the media has come to mean nothing, and everything, and so is useless. Let's get the country back by taking the language back, or some of it, at least, as part of the task.
A few diabolically well-chosen words, repeated over and over to millions of people, resulted in the longest, most expensive, and most criminal, war ever prosecuted by the United States.
We heard in every town and city in the country the incessant din of the words "terrorists", "God", "bin Laden", "evil" "America", "freedom" and the like.
Almost overnight and as if by magic, about a hundred million adult Americans were bewitched, bewildered, bedazzled, and most of all bothered; not by the words themselves, and certainly not by the events to which the words referred, but the emotions which those words- those sounds, those vibrations- consistently stirred up.
The endless stream of war-enabling and hate-mongering words that came from almost all the "leaders", as well as almost all the news people we habitually trusted, turned the mood of the nation towards a hunger for war.
Because fight or flight emotions were activated, this hunger for war was personal, like sex or the need to use the bathroom, and that made it very powerful in each individual who felt it.
But although it was personal and individual, the war lust so permeated the whole society that the effect of millions became one effect, and the United States of America took a huge leap towards a new kind of society that more resembles a colonial animal, such as a jellyfish or a slime mold, than a nation of free and free-thinking, free-acting individuals with reason to hope for a better future.
Words, used for effect, were so important to make the wars happen, and have so helped to keep the wars going, that their importance in this context cannot be overstated. It is ultimately a question of life or death, as history has shown in societies where the words used by demagogues caused the death of many. This is happening in our society today.
But if words can be effective in bringing war, they can also be effective in helping to bring about peace. "God" has nothing to do with this.*
--------
Manic Monday Bonus Mini-rant:
* "God" has zero to do with the wars.
If I were this character "God", I would be mightily and divinely- nay, even PROPHETICALLY pissed off at being made the unwilling front man for all the wickedness and crime being done by liars and murderers who want to excuse themselves by claiming that they work for me. They don't work for anyone but their own thieving murderous selves.
Good analysis of the misuse of language to serve propagandistic ends.
As for the God part: when will people realize that seeing God in the huMAN image and likeness is a seriously short-sighted delusion.
I agree with use about the misuse of words as central to warmongering.
An "elite" soldier is really another name for a remorseless killer. These soldiers are
out of the ordinary, partly because they are more willing than most to do whatever is asked
of them in petrpetrating violence.
Ruthless...Barbaric or Murderous might be better terms then "elite".
No one should assume that these bases will be unmanned by US/EURO personnel anytime in the near future.
They are key empire infrastructure for Central Asia. The purpose is to support and house advances in military hardware and social control programs for use throughout the Central Asian region.
These new centers facilitate operations in Iran, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Russia, China, etc. They are definitely not going away until the empire program is fully comprehended and dismantled.
Good information from Turse, but like nearly all writers on Afghanistan he fails to mention trans-Afghan pipeline plans enabling the empire of Big Oil to exploit the oil and gas resources of Central Asia (including reserves in Afghanistan) that will be marketed through S.Asia and is NOT for American consumption.
The permanent infrastructure and an extended occupation is planned for the long term as there may a century worth of resources in the region. Unfortunately Washington has already run out of tax dollars to subsidize this corporate imperialism.
The Third World Traveler website is good source of comprehensive information on this subject, although this article was written in 2003.
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Central_Asia_watch/Afghanistan_CAsia_Oil.html
Afghanistan, Central Asia, Georgia
Key to Oil Profits
by Karen Talbot
Good article! More war machine build up including air power! Not in the least good!
Oil and other energy sources might be involved and Western power elties' real target.
Sounds like it.
In the heyday of European colonialism, the natives bore witness to "forts" and "garrisons" and "trading posts" erected in their midst as "outposts of progress."
Today, in the American version, we have "enduring bases," but the logic is just the same: keep boots on the ground to keep the natives in line.
And so the war will never end. At some point, our leaders might say that it is over, but the natives will understand, because of the occupying army in their country, that the war is forever.
yes.
"[This] consciousness is alienated consciousness: there is no ecstatic merger with nature, but rather total separation from it.
"Subject and object are always seen in opposition to each other…The logical endpoint of [this] worldview is a feeling of total reification: everything is an object, alien, not-me; and I am ultimately an object, too, an alienated 'thing' in a world of other, equally meaningless things.'
[Increasingly our experience of life might be described this way]:
This…cosmos cares nothing for me, and I do not really feel a sense of belonging to it. What I feel, in fact, is a sickness in the soul.'"
--- Morris Berman, The Re-enchantment of the World.
"This…cosmos cares nothing for me, and I do not really feel a sense of belonging to it."
Yes. This is the logical and ultimate result of maturing within an anti-nature culture, what I call the empire culture and failing to mature within a natural partnership where consciousness is apparent in all and one's personal experience is an "ecstatic merger with nature", a feeling of belonging so alive, so complete, it cannot be challenged, has no opposite, it simply 'is life'.
And yet there is an opposite. And it is what empire culture has created to replace natural intelligence and its living partnership.
If we had a working car and then someone came along and proceeded to take each and every of its parts apart, laid them separately upon the ground and invented new rules for arranging them...
We would basically have an inoperable assemblage, no part would be functioning as it was designed to...
And left to its own devices, such parts might quickly despair of finding any purpose whatsoever in their lives. At which point, a new order might get invented (military, etc.) to provide each part with a sense of purpose and belonging to something no matter how dead and useless that something might now be.
Great article, Nick!
Bottle wrote:
"This is so dispiriting. These people-- not my people-- are simply incapable of getting the message. Have they ever read a book? Studied history? Thought of ways to avoid rather than engender war?"
~~~~
Bottle, My answer would be that now, more than ever, naivete is an indulgence we can scarcely afford.
~~~~~~~~~
"Psychotronic weapons."
On CNN News, the Pentagon said, “Radiofrequency weapons are too sensitive to discuss,” and has maintained this position throughout the 1980s. In the 1990s, however, the military admitted to looking for emr weapons based on nonthermal bioeffects.
Russian classified mind control programs were revealed only as a result of the monumental event of the breakup of the Soviet Union. The 1993 Defense News article, “US Explores Russian Mind-Control Technology,” described some of Russia’s emr weapons:
"Known as acoustic psycho-correction, the capability to control minds and alter behavior of civilians and soldiers may soon be shared with US military, medical and political officials, according to US and Russian sources.
".... Pioneered by the government-funded Department of Psycho-Correction at the Moscow Medical Academy, acoustic psycho-correction involves the transmission of specific commands via static or white noise bands into the human subconscious without upsetting other intellectual functions."
They don't need all that... there are antipsychotics and anaxiolytics drugs in widespread use which, although not developed or prescribed for the purpose, are quite remarkable in their ability to help maintain a general kind of societal mind control.
Until Americans quit taking psychiatric drugs, there will be no real restoration of democracy possible.
The drugs already being prescribed to millions slowly work to destroy the will and to diminish the higher faculties and sensitivities distinguishing us from the beasts.
The future is now, and it doesn't have to be "Soma", and it doesn't have to be total.
As things are now, and in combination with other factors, psychiatric drugs already in use help to keep the population just sedated and dull-witted enough to prevent peace or economic activism from becoming widespread the way it did in the 1960's.
And no, I am not kidding.
"Still, it’s clear that the military is building in that country as if an enduring American presence were a given. "
Yes, and I don't recall them asking.
We have absolutely no say in the matter, and the reality is that we will be forced to pay for it.
We could, I guess, choose the alternatives of eventual jail time or forfeiture of our property, instead of allowing ourselves to be held up time and time again by the bandits in suits running the wars, but most people won't do that.
The U.S. is continually building itself huge expensive facilities over there, but sees no need to repair all the thousands of things that have been destroyed, or to make any reparations.
It is becoming clearer day by day that our foreign policy is nothing but pure criminality in that region.
The American people shouldn't stand for it.
But most Americans are half-asleep at best, and the half that isn't asleep is afraid, or maybe understands that the wars are just business, and that what matters is that there's still money to be made.
U.S. policy is completely mercenary, cynical, dishonest, and shockingly cold- hearted. The policy amounts to this: human beings will repopulate fairly quickly, but once oil and minerals are gone, they're gone.
Our government has been taken over by vampires. Maybe real ones. That would explain this evil, ongoing war insanity as well as anything.
If this is America I am not American.