EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
Popular content
Today's Top News
What a Difference an Occupation Makes
It was never a genuine question. Money media prattled on about Occupy Wall Street’s supposedly ineffable demands the same way they batted aside the end capitalism signs to wonder what the Seattle protesters had on their minds. That said, the Occupy movement has always been more about doing than demanding and this week, OWS stepped it up another notch.
On December 6, OccupyYourHomes joined with local community organizers to take on the housing crisis. In twenty-five cities, protesters interrupted house auctions, blocked evictions and occupied foreclosed homes. In East New York they moved Alfredo Carrasquillo, Tasha Glasgow and their two children into a foreclosed home that had stood empty for three years. I attended the action Tuesday and couldn’t drag myself away. Even as the rain drizzled and the temperature sank, I watched the numbers of protesters grow and thought of the many, many members of underfunded community groups I’ve spoken to over the years. Among those, Community Voices Heard, New York Communities for Change, Picture the Homeless, Organize for Occupation, VOCAL-NY and Reclaim the Land. They talked on GRITtv about toxic loans and targeted neighborhoods, forced foreclosures, fear and the general lack of national interest.
This Tuesday, I saw members of those same groups again, among them, GRITtv regular Rob Robinson. An end-homelessness activist who lived on the streets for a while after losing his job at a data processing company, Robinson has worked for years with Picture the Homeless, and now Reclaim the Land. East New York has one of the city’s greatest concentrations of single-family homes, and one of the country’s highest rates of eviction and foreclosures. “For two years, we’ve been going block to block, knocking on these doors,” said Robinson. This Tuesday, he was walking those blocks again, this time, with 500 people—and a slew of cameras—at his back. Smiled Robinson, “It makes a world of difference.”
Malik Rhasaan is a 28-year-old man from South Jamaica, Queens, who’s been one of of the organizers behind Occupy The Hood. Rhassan, with colleagues in Detroit and Atlanta, started pushing Occupy Wall Street to team up with communities in need ever since the protest began in Zuccotti Park. “You want to feed people, do it in the South Bronx” he’d say. “You want to fight eviction? Fight it in the South Bronx.” To Rhassan, December 6 was a jump in the right direction. “Now we’ll see how long the ball rolls.” In the twenty-four hours that followed, Occupy The Hood received “about a hundred e-mails” from people Rhassaan had never heard of before, asking OWS to come to their block.
On Thursday afternoon, as a tweet went out that more OWS support was needed at 702 Vermont Avenue, the occupied house in East New York, Rhasaan said, “I just hope the people who participated [in the December 6 action] realize how serious this is. That father [Alfredo] is trusting the community to be there for him…” In fact, that’s been the question for the movement from the start: can it sustain all that to which it’s given birth? First it was about confidence. Robinson says he was skeptical until he saw the occupation survive long enough to make mistakes—and ask for help. “They reached out. And I was impressed with that.” Then it was about a place: offer food and shelter for long enough and soon you’ll attract people who have no place of their own and need to eat. Says Rhasaan: “Homeless kids gave OWS its numbers.… OWS gave those kids a second chance to have a life.” Now it’s communities.
As Boots Riley, of Occupy Oakland (and the Coup) told me a few weeks back. “What we’re thinking about now is how OWS can become a tool in the hands of communities.” Which is to say, where can 500, 1,000, 2,000 people, make a difference? At an eviction, a housing auction, a school board hearing, in a congressman’s office—OWS have shown they can make an impact in all those places. American employers have a nasty habit of picking off lone-labor organizers.
Will that be next? “It’s certainly harder to fire a Walmart union organizer in front of a crowd, in public,” says Riley. Knowing OWS, we’ll probably see a bit of all of the above. It’s a lot to bite off and chew.
“The way to get community support,” says Rhasaan “is to work in the community. Offer change people can measure.” Note, he didn’t say “believe in.” Been there, done that. What’s being asked of OWS now is not what the movement can demand but what they can deliver, for people who feel their lives, not just their hopes, hang in the balance.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


14 Comments so far
Show All"“What we’re thinking about now is how OWS can become a tool in the hands of communities.” Which is to say, where can 500, 1,000, 2,000 people, make a difference? At an eviction, a housing auction, a school board hearing, in a congressman’s office—OWS have shown they can make an impact in all those places. "
This is an excellent question and an excellent idea. This is where occupy can really be a useful movement. We should be going to the auctions and the evictions. Action on this level is useful where as camping in squares is just a jumble of un-coordinated thoughts. Still it needs leaders and organization.
Shade,
It's from the "jumble of uncoordinated thoughts" that community-oriented activism gets its impetus. It's the magic of self-organization. "Leaders and organization" tend to cause genuine rage to be mollified. It's called co-optation.
Bag. It is from coherent, coordinated and well led efforts that elections are won with candidates who support our ideas. The people in the streets are meaningless unless they get people elected to office. When there is an OCCUPY block in Congress as there is a Teaparty block, then we will have traction. Till then "community oriented self-organization" is political masturbation, feels nice but lacking in any real meaning. If that's what you support, then by all means go for it.
Absolute misunderstanding of the Occupation movement being expressed here, with this notion that one must elect people to succeed. A principal point being made by the Occupation is that electoral politics is not now a fruitful place to put one's energies. The entire system is so fundamentally corrupted by the oligarchs that only a fool puts energies into playing that game. The Occupy movement is working to change consciousness, change the lexicon of thought. Further, the Occupation is based on a horizontal structure, not in a vertical hierarchy in which power and money "trickle down" from the richest oligarchs. We're not interested in your elections just now, thank you.
It is much worse than that. He is saying that you have no value, are of no consequence. He couches it as an observation, but it is not. It is his desire, not his observation, his agenda is to make sure that you will never be of any consequence. He supports those who will do whatever it takes to make sure you never have any power, and value, any worth.
"Community-oriented self-organization" lacks meaning? It happens to mean self-determination for the people. And that's the whole issue of the day. Make sure the Wizard of Oz isn't distracting you. We either reject him completely or we become his slave. Give him an inch and he takes a mile.
Wow. What a revealing comment.
"The people in the streets are meaningless unless they get people elected to office."
So, all of us are valuable only to the degree that we vote for the ruling class politicians that Shade prefers.
That is exactly what so many apologists for the system are saying to us, although it is rare that their true agenda is revealed like this. They have nothing but contempt for all of us, we are worth nothing whatsoever to them and are only pawns in the game.
Line up and choose one set of corporate owned politicians. Other than that, you have no value and no worth.
It has leaders--they just don't call themselves that. I love it, it is so confusing for people who want structure. One minute its a veteran "debating" the NYPD, the next minute its an advocate for the homeless, and tomorrow it will be ??????
There are leaders and organization and its at the level that the powers that be can't handle. They can't find them--because they don't exist.
By the time this is over there will be new community leaders and new members of city councils and school boards (I hope). The first step was to get people off their butts (me included) and this ground swell feels good to me.
Yes there will be missteps and push back (propaganda wars) but I'm loving this.
You go guy! You have the fire in the belly now. We are reinventing a world for, of, and by the people. For sure we are going to make mistakes, but that is part of the process. As long as we keep moving forward, in community together, we will become an unstoppable force. And the world we live in will change, little by little, bit by bit. It took a very long time to get to this point where our children, and all future generations have no meaningful future. It will take a lot of years and a whole lot of shoulders on the wheel, but we will get there. Keep that fire alive. Engage, connect, do the impossible. Together!
I think the OWS need to go after the supposed Christian Fundamentlists who are connected with big Business . They are the push that puts pressure on the laws that help others, especially women and people of other races, to take away help needed. The Fundamentalist wish to be the world dictators.
Maddy,
Do you really think that would be a good idea? How would they express their opposition to the Christian Fundamentalists? (Extremists) Can you imagine what the MSM propaganda machine would do were such an opposition openly declared? Do you believe that Christian Fundamentalists control the ruling elites? (the actual powers behind the throne)
Imagine the msn news idiots proclaiming that the OWS movement is at war with Christians. Fox would be reporting that OWS is at war with Jesus himself. I don't think that would work out too well for the occupy movement. Do you?
Take care
Thomas Gilbert-
No. Only the rich pastors who are stealing from their flocks should be targets. The point of the Occupation movement is with the big money interests--mostly corporate--that have bought the political class, the media, the boards-of-trustees of public institutions, the police, the privatizing prison system, the election system, etc., using money stolen from the rest of us. Let's not diffuse the movement by going after Christian Fundamentalism per se. After all, there are a lot of poor, dispossessed, and marginalized fundamentalist Christians out there who are economic victims and surely are part of the 99%. Let's not declare them enemies.
Occupy Wall Street has morphed into something akin to phrase heard in many a rap song, 'We don't die, we multiply!' Just as the police and their bosses of 80's America failed to understand that phrase, so too they have utterly failed to comprehend what OWS is and is morphing into.
Ya gotta love it; it's going viral; there's no stopping it now!
http://occupywallst.org/
Despite the 24/7 dictation from "the Shady One" and his army of disinformation trolls, OWS is direct democracy with no opportunity for his Fake-Representational-Democracy failure to repeat itself.
OWS is dead on, baby. It is right on track. It doesn't need advice from the thousands of Pentagon trolls and subcontract corporate spin doctors who sit in cubicles trying to mislead the American Public and get us back into the dead-end casino voting both. A computer voting booth which is fraught with corporate deception and fraud.
No, we already tried Representational Government in the presence of the Wall Street Mafia and it's corrupting Zombie Banks: IT DOESN'T WORK.
OWS, at the street level, does work.
TJ