EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Soaring Food Prices, Wild Weather, Upheaval, and a Planetful of Trouble
Reading the World In a Loaf of Bread
What can a humble loaf of bread tell us about the world?
The answer is: far more than you might imagine. For one thing, that loaf can be “read” as if it were a core sample extracted from the heart of a grim global economy. Looked at another way, it reveals some of the crucial fault lines of world politics, including the origins of the Arab spring that has now become a summer of discontent.
Consider this: between June 2010 and June 2011, world grain prices almost doubled. In many places on this planet, that proved an unmitigated catastrophe. In those same months, several governments fell, rioting broke out in cities from Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, to Nairobi, Kenya, and most disturbingly three new wars began in Libya, Yemen, and Syria. Even on Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, Bedouin tribes are now in revolt against the country’s interim government and manning their own armed roadblocks.
And in each of these situations, the initial trouble was traceable, at least in part, to the price of that loaf of bread. If these upheavals were not “resource conflicts” in the formal sense of the term, think of them at least as bread-triggered upheavals.
Growing Climate Change in a Wheat Field
Bread has classically been known as the staff of life. In much of the world, you can’t get more basic, since that daily loaf often stands between the mass of humanity and starvation. Still, to read present world politics from a loaf of bread, you first have to ask: of what exactly is that loaf made? Water, salt, and yeast, of course, but mainly wheat, which means when wheat prices increase globally, so does the price of that loaf -- and so does trouble.
To imagine that there’s nothing else in bread, however, is to misunderstand modern global agriculture. Another key ingredient in our loaf -- call it a “factor of production” -- is petroleum. Yes, crude oil, which appears in our bread as fertilizer and tractor fuel. Without it, wheat wouldn’t be produced, processed, or moved across continents and oceans.
And don’t forget labor. It’s an ingredient in our loaf, too, but not perhaps in the way you might imagine. After all, mechanization has largely displaced workers from the field to the factory. Instead of untold thousands of peasants planting and harvesting wheat by hand, industrial workers now make tractors and threshers, produce fuel, chemical pesticides, and nitrogen fertilizer, all rendered from petroleum and all crucial to modern wheat growing. If the labor power of those workers is transferred to the wheat field, it happens in the form of technology. Today, a single person driving a huge $400,000 combine, burning 200 gallons of fuel daily, guided by computers and GPS satellite navigation, can cover 20 acres an hour, and harvest 8,000 to 10,000 bushels of wheat in a single day.
Next, without financial capital -- money -- our loaf of bread wouldn’t exist. It’s necessary to purchase the oil, the fertilizer, that combine, and so on. But financial capital may indirectly affect the price of our loaf even more powerfully. When there is too much liquid capital moving through the global financial system, speculators start to bid-up the price of various assets, including all the ingredients in bread. This sort of speculation naturally contributes to rising fuel and grain prices.
The final ingredients come from nature: sunlight, oxygen, water, and nutritious soil, all in just the correct amounts and at just the right time. And there’s one more input that can’t be ignored, a different kind of contribution from nature: climate change, just now really kicking in, and increasingly the key destabilizing element in bringing that loaf of bread disastrously to market.
Marketing Disaster
When these ingredients mix in a way that sends the price of bread soaring, politics enters the picture. Consider this, for instance: the upheavals in Egypt lay at the heart of the Arab Spring. Egypt is also the world’s single largest wheat importer, followed closely by Algeria and Morocco. Keep in mind as well that the Arab Spring started in Tunisia when rising food prices, high unemployment, and a widening gap between rich and poor triggered deadly riots and finally the flight of the country’s autocratic ruler Zine Ben Ali. His last act was a vow to reduce the price of sugar, milk, and bread -- and it was too little too late.
With that, protests began in Egypt and the Algerian government ordered increased wheat imports to stave off growing unrest over food prices. As global wheat prices surged by 70% between June and December 2010, bread consumption in Egypt started to decline under what economists termed “price rationing.” And that price kept rising all through the spring of 2011. By June, wheat cost 83% more than it had a year before. During the same time frame, corn prices surged by a staggering 91%. Egypt is the world’s fourth largest corn importer. When not used to make bread, corn is often employed as a food additive and to feed poultry and livestock. Algeria, Syria, Morocco, and Saudi Arabia are among the top 15 corn importers. As those wheat and corn prices surged, it was not just the standard of living of the Egyptian poor that was threatened, but their very lives as climate-change driven food prices triggered political violence.
In Egypt, food is a volatile political issue. After all, one in five Egyptians live on less than $1 a day and the government provides subsidized bread to 14.2 million people in a population of 83 million. Last year, overall food-price inflation in Egypt was running at more than 20%. This had an instant and devastating impact on Egyptian families, who spend on average 40% of their often exceedingly meager monthly incomes simply feeding themselves.
Against this backdrop, World Bank President Robert Zoellick fretted that the global food system was "one shock away from a full-fledged crisis." And if you want to trace that near full-fledged crisis back to its environmental roots, the place to look is climate change, the increasingly extreme and devastating weather being experienced across this planet.
When it comes to bread, it went like this: In the summer of 2010, Russia, one of the world’s leading wheat exporters, suffered its worst drought in 100 years. Known as the Black Sea Drought, this extreme weather triggered fires that burnt down vast swathes of Russian forests, bleached farmlands, and damaged the country’s breadbasket wheat crop so badly that its leaders (urged on by western grain speculators) imposed a year-long ban on wheat exports. As Russia is among the top four wheat exporters in any year, this caused prices to surge upward.
At the same time, massive flooding occurred in Australia, another significant wheat exporter, while excessive rains in the American Midwest and Canada damaged corn production. Freakishly massive flooding in Pakistan, which put some 20% of that country under water, also spooked markets and spurred on the speculators.
And that’s when those climate-driven prices began to soar in Egypt. The ensuing crisis, triggered in part by that rise in the price of our loaf of bread, led to upheaval and finally the fall of the country’s reigning autocrat Hosni Mubarak. Tunisia and Egypt helped trigger a crisis that led to an incipient civil war and then western intervention in neighboring Libya, which meant most of that country’s production of 1.4 million barrels of oil a day went off-line. That, in turn, caused the price of crude oil to surge, at its height hitting $125 a barrel, which set off yet more speculation in food markets, further driving up grain prices.
And recent months haven't brought much relief. Once again, significant, in some cases record, flooding has damaged crops in Canada, the United States, and Australia. Meanwhile, an unexpected spring drought in northern Europe has hurt grain crops as well. The global food system is visibly straining, if not snapping, under the intense pressure of rising demand, rising energy prices, growing water shortages, and most of all the onset of climate chaos.
And this, the experts tell us, is only the beginning. The price of our loaf of bread is forecast to increase by up to 90% over the next 20 years. That will mean yet more upheavals, more protest, greater desperation, heightened conflicts over water, increased migration, roiling ethnic and religious violence, banditry, civil war, and (if past history is any judge) possibly a raft of new interventions by imperial and possibly regional powers.
And how are we responding to this gathering crisis? Has there been a broad new international initiative focused on ensuring food security for the global poor -- that is to say, a stable, affordable price for our loaf of bread? You already know the sad answer to that question.
Instead, massive corporations like Glencore, the world’s largest commodity trading company, and the privately held and secretive Cargill, the world’s biggest trader of agricultural commodities, are moving to further consolidate their control of world grain markets and vertically integrate their global supply chains in a new form of food imperialism designed to profit off global misery. While bread triggered war and revolution in the Middle East, Glencore made windfall profits on the surge in grain prices. And the more expensive our loaf of bread becomes the more money firms like Glencore and Cargill stand to make. Consider that just about the worst possible form of “adaptation” to the climate crisis.
So what text should flash through our brains when reading our loaf of bread? A warning, obviously. But so far, it seems, a warning ignored.
To listen to Timothy MacBain’s latest TomCast audio interview in which Parenti discusses the origins of his latest book and how climate change contributes to global violence, click here, or download it to your iPod here.
To stay on top of important articles like these, sign up to receive the latest updates from TomDispatch.com here.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


29 Comments so far
Show AllAnother lame article from The Nation !
A good read:
How Goldman Sachs Created the Food Crisis
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/04/27/how_goldman_sachs_created_the_food_crisis?page=0,1
"Don't blame American appetites, rising oil prices, or genetically modified crops for rising food prices. Wall Street's at fault for the spiraling cost of food.
The money tells the story. Since the bursting of the tech bubble in 2000, there has been a 50-fold increase in dollars invested in commodity index funds. To put the phenomenon in real terms: In 2003, the commodities futures market still totaled a sleepy $13 billion. But when the global financial crisis sent investors running scared in early 2008, and as dollars, pounds, and euros evaded investor confidence, commodities -- including food -- seemed like the last, best place for hedge, pension, and sovereign wealth funds to park their cash. "You had people who had no clue what commodities were all about suddenly buying commodities," an analyst from the United States Department of Agriculture told me. In the first 55 days of 2008, speculators poured $55 billion into commodity markets, and by July, $318 billion was roiling the markets. Food inflation has remained steady since."
We all like simple answers, but in an increasingly complicated world, the simple answer is, more and more, only a hint of truth. Saying that Goldman Sachs created the food crisis is completely ludicrous. Other companies and individual speculators the world over helped boost prices. And why did this happen? Lots of reasons, but world population growth and especially weather concerns head the list. Stupid people think global climate change is all fake bs. Most people with serious money understand the seriousness and implications of crazy, wild weather.
So exponential population growth, the gradual exhaustion of cheap fossil energy, the increasing waste and loss of affordable fresh water supplies throughout the drier parts of our planet, and global climate weirdness don't have anything to do with rising global food prices? We can blame it all on G-S?
Well that's a relief.
Wheat, corn, soybean, rice, etc. prices have not steadily inflated, as claimed here. Wheat rose from the lowest prices in history to the highest prices IF YOU DON'T COUNT INFLATION, but these were still not in the top half of all time prices, if you do adjust for inflation. Farm commodities have still not risen very high in historical terms, as statistics about a "50-fold" increase in investment might suggest. For decades we had consistently lower and lower wheat and similar prices, as a result of the dropping of US farm price floors. The US chose to lose money on farm commodity exports. That ended on 2 recent years for wheat, (for the first time since 1972), but then returned each time. See my other comment here.
It's much the same for the other crops.
And the brilliant Mr. Parenti said:
"Yes, crude oil, which appears in our bread as fertilizer"
Not true.
Oil is not used in the production of fertilizer. The macronutrients required by plants are N (Nitrogen), K (Potassium) and P (Phosphorus). Oil is hydrocarbon, made from H (Hydrogen) and C (Carbon). There are no plant nutrients in oil.
Nitrogen fertilizer (N) is made from ammonia, which in turn is manufactured from natural gas, not oil. Natural gas is not peaking, but when it does, fertilizer can be produced from coal, as is done in China.
good idea, let's make fertilizer out of coal (a hydrocarbon) just like China. Alas
Fuel is also used in the movement of the fertilizer, the application of the fertilizer and the manufacture of that fertilizer. It's also used to move the bread after it's been used to bake the bread. In addition to that, in our part of the world it's used to power the cars that get us to jobs to buy the bread, and fuel the power plants...
GONZO: Your first post was helpful, but the author's implication involves the fuel used to bring plants to harvest, i.e. to power the machinery. He wasn't suggesting that oil is part and parcel to plants' anatomical structures!
Christian Parenti gave an extremely cogent talk at the Hillside Club in Berkeley last week.
Unlike so many journalists offering patter and official cliche as analysis, Parenti is extremely adept at ferreting out the economic, historical, and environmental roots of the tectonic plates shaping our future.
Perhaps because of his pedigree and intellectual training --his father is the Marxist historian Michael Parenti and Christian has a Ph.D from the London School of Economics-- he strips away a lot of the dross & platitudes masquerading as 'deep thinking' among the 'punditocracy' and illuminates the authentic connections.
Think of him as the anti-Thomas Friedman -- if you are familiar with any of the musings of that extremely popular purveyor of drivel.
http://www.nypress.com/article-11419-flathead.html
His latest book is extremely enlightening if you want to catch a serious glimpse of our future. It would be an excellent companion book to read along side the Mike Davis classic-- 'Late Victorian Holocausts' because both probe the nexus between climate, political economy, and catastrophe.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2001/jan/20/historybooks.famine
We are a long way from demanding change here in the USA. Too many still hop in their SUVs and drive three blocks to buy their loaf of bread.
Good link gonzonews, A good read on the history and workings of commodities markets is "The Asylum" by Leah McGrath Goodman. There may be a solution to this problem, a windfall profits tax. Since mid April oil and gasoline prices have fallen. That is when coincidentally Venezuela imposed a windfall profits tax on oil. See http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/04/28-4. Knowing that any price over a certain amount will be taxed at the point of production, something that cannot be phoned to London or Hong Kong, can dampen the enthusiasm of traders. It doesn't require that every state impose a tax. All it takes is a small portion of the market to be taxed, say wheat in Argentina or soybeans in Canada.
Don't you just love the idea that a tax on a commodity in one small country can actually reduce the price of that commodity worldwide? A fact that flies in the face of neo-conservative economic ideology. The knowledge that governments can and possibly will interfere in the great commodities casino can cause a lot of scrota to tighten and fingers to slow when pressing the Bloomberg execute function.
I do not think you have a very good understanding of your subject. Your statement that "Knowing that any price over a certain amount will be taxed at the point of production..." means that a soybean farmer, for instance, would lose his ass if a drought damaged his production, but ensuing higher prices would feed the government instead of the farmer. This situation would cause farmer's severe irritation, to put it mildly. And, by the way, taxing some soybeans in Canada will NOT lower prices worldwide. If anything, it will raise world prices.
"Fertilizer production accounts for 28% of all the energy used in agriculture, but the limiting input to fertilizer production is not oil, or even fossil fuels, per se. The important input is hydrogen. Nitrogen fertilizers are made from ammonia, which for nearly a hundred years has been synthesized using the Haber-Bosch process. The Haber-Bosch process makes ammonia from hydrogen, nitrogen from the air, and an iron catalyst. Since the 1960s, most of the hydrogen for this process has come from reformed natural gas. Since the mid-70s it has been unprofitable to use fuel oil for this process."
http://helpychalk.blogspot.com/2006/01/peak-oil-and-fertilizer.html
Of course, farmers can get abundant nitrogen free from the air in organic systems without fossil fuels, with powerful legumes like Nitro-Alfalfa and Berseem Clover.
I wonder if they're trying to figure out how to also sell us carbon, (n-p-k & then c) so we can buy from them instead of using photosynthesis?
Parenti is correct that droughts, floods, hail storms and other weather phenomena affect commodity prices. Where the speculators come in is that natural 10 cent increase in price is amplified by traders into a 2 dollar increase. So is the doubling of prices due the climate chaos or market chaos? We need to focus on both problems. Farmers over time can adjust to some changes, as Parenti discovered in Afghanistan. There a 10 years drought has made growing opium poppies a better option since it requires one fifth the water that wheat requires. To find out this, unpublished in the US, information he asked the farmers. To feed his family the farmer buys wheat to make bread with money earned growing opium poppies since he can't grow wheat in the drought.
Farmers in Afghanistan are controlled by drug lords; farmers in the US are controlled by corporate giants. There is little difference between the two.
Thank you, Christian Parenti, for a great article!
(Yes, I read the first two postings in the thread, and I think very little of them.)
axkershaw:
I have had several progressive friends send me similar articles on the "food crisis".
And almost without exception the Wall Street end of things is ignored.
The new commodity wheeling and dealing is yet another blessing of deregulation.
Regarding the issue of what are the basic constituents of artificial fetilizer (i.e., nitrogen fertilizer) and the source of said constituents, the important input (or ingredient, if you will) is hygrogen, and hydrogen is commonly derived from natural gas in the making of nitrogen fertilizer. Oil has no role to play in the chemical manufacture of this type of fertilizer.
However, that error on Parenti's part (see 6th paragraph of the article) does not annul the value of the article.
Why did the price of wheat double? Here are some pieces to put into the equation. A global population of 7 billion and growing daily assures a continued expansion in demand. Agricultural technology has been unable to keep up with demand. World grain production per capita has been on a downward trend since 1984. Over those 23 years, our grain surpluses have dwindled to insignificance. There may not be enough readily available grains to respond to the next hunger crisis. Global warming has played havoc with the weather in grain growing regions contributing to the crisis. Demand for declining supplies of water has impacted irrigation. Projections that the next doubling in wheat prices will take many years are divorced from reality. Hunger and starvation are just around the corner for many of the less fortunate 7 billion. Imagine the disruptions that will cause.
Post froma related article...
A reading of the IPCC chart of CO2 and temp deviation from mean over the last 650ky, popularly presented in Gore's movie (projected on a wall) and book (a foldout page) coincides exactly with the conclusions to be drawn from the NOAA sea level chart you linked.
At the present and projected levels of CO2 ppm, it is a leap of faith, and maybe our only hope, that whatever forces are at play will produce another iceage cycle rather than the more deadly version of runaway heat.
Either way, it's the end of business as usual, and requires the same immediate and radical changes to the way humans do everything. We must prepare to survive rather than to consume.
Two pieces of random info point to the inclusion of a new player in the game---seismic activity. Those being a Nat'l Geographic article on global water resources stating that the change in location of the mass of material and water at the 3 Gorges Dam in China had moved the earth's axis some few cm; and that the movement of part of the island of Japan by the 9.0 quake had moved the axis 10cm+. There is the 120ky long cycle of ice-on, ice-off that affects teconic plates in both their vertical and horizontal movements; and which affects the forces associated with spinning mass changing location on the planet.
Seismic activity, volcanism, tsunami, etc, probably add heat and disturb sequestered methane. Who knows?
As for the time we have left to make changes...O.
If these charts described the cyclical value of a financial security, all the masters of the universe on Wall St would be selling outright, and hedging the planetary cookout.
But they are defending the status quo. Only the natives are getting restless, and damn few of them...er, us.
Hunger and thirst are great motivators, but the scariest part is climate change. We must start growing food in sustainable ways, and even with that there are no guarantees. Changing climate can foil the best attempts. Too much rain, not enough rain, hail, fire, flood, blights, or swarms of locust could wipe out crops virtually overnight on every continent.
The capitalists must be stopped if people are to have any chance what-so-ever.
Think large, live small.
A fine article indeed. Many have worked to point out these, yet every new effort is a good reminder. Just keep the ball rolling! "Man shall not live by bread alone". At the same time, man must eat to survive! On all fronts, it will need good moral and efforts to balance all as far as possible.
Though, this is said, the "environmental" dimension should concern us deeply, for it is a sign that we have failed to nurse and take proper care of a key variable in the process of sustaining ourselves on this earth. The role of "big capital" in agriculture, is welcome if the courage is still mustered to tame, modernize and harmonize values, practices, inputs, processes, quality, culture of consumption and last but not least, the 'almighty' market.
Ah, The Nation. That leftist magazine that found it too radical to endorse Nader or McKinney.
michaelps said:
"A global population of 7 billion and growing daily assures a continued expansion in demand. Agricultural technology has been unable to keep up with demand."
Wheat production from 2008-20010 exceeded consumption.
http://www.agrostats.com/world-statistic/world-wheat-production.html
typo: 2008-2010
This article is also of interest. Not sure how production/consumption worked for 2010-2011, but although Russia had a bad crop last year, India had record a record wheat crop some of which is rotting in storage as they restricted exports.
http://en.mercopress.com/2010/04/13/usda-predicts-largest-global-glut-of-wheat-since-2002
Tuesday, April 13th 2010
USDA predicts largest global glut of wheat since 2002
"The world will have so much wheat this year that the US farmers could leave every acre unplanted and still have a surplus, a sign of more losses after futures had their worst first quarter in 15 years."
And the most outrageous spike in wheat prices occurred in 2008-2009 at a time when there were no production and consumption shortages that could have possibly explained the spike.
Chart:
http://www.indexmundi.com/commodities/?commodity=wheat&months=300
According to daily pricing there is presently a moderate decline in wheat prices.
There is a glut of oil at the present time and the Saudis are cutting production.
Supply is up for oil, but prices remain high, thanks to speculation and manipulation.
Etc.
And if anyone is still following this thread:
Huge spikes in natural gas (raising fertilizer/food prices) were due to "excessive speculation".
Same is true of food commodities, thus very high food prices. Oil prices also suffer from this problem. Higher fuel prices raise food prices from production to delivery to food stores.
We are now importing ammonium nitrate from Russia as their natural gas price is very low not being effected by the manipulations of our domestic natural gas. I would imagine this speculation game also affects our gas home heating prices.
Price chart:
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/commodity/natural-gas
And conclusions of Senate investigation.
http://www.cfr.org/united-states/senate-staff-report-excessive-speculation-natural-gas-market/p15031
Senate Staff Report: "Excessive Speculation in the Natural Gas Market"
Published July 2007
This report was conducted by the United States Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Chairman Senator Carl Levin and Ranking Minority Member Senator Norm Coleman led the subcommittee that investigated speculation in the natural gas market; they found that,
"1. A single hedge fund, Amaranth Advisors LLC, dominated the U.S. natural gas market in 2006.
2. In August 2006, Amaranth traded natural gas contracts on ICE rather than on NYMEX so that it could trade without any restrictions on the size of its positions.
3. Amaranth's actions in causing significant price movements in the natural gas market demonstrate that excessive speculation distorts prices, increases volatility, and increases costs and risks for natural gas consumers, such as utilities, who ultimately pass on inflated costs to their customers.
4. The two major U.S. exchanges that trade natural gas - NYMEX and ICE - affect each other's prices.
5. Current restraints on speculative trading to prevent manipulation and price distortions are inadequate.
6. The CFTC is unable to meet its statutory mandate to prevent market manipulation and excessive speculation from causing sudden unreasonable, or unwarranted energy prices."
Parenti gives us the problems caused by recent higher farm prices for wheat, corn, rice and other crops, but leaves out the bigger picture of long term low prices that created the poverty behind the food poverty crisis. So we have a dilemma, not a simple problem of recent higher prices. 80% of the "undernourished" are rural, (UN-FAO "Livestock in the Balance," p. 3) so they need fair trade farm prices. 1942-1952 we had parity prices, because we had adequate price floors and supply management, but recent yearly average prices for wheat hit only 63% of parity. On the other hand, the poor living on $1 per day can't even afford wheat at export dumping prices. That's the dilemma. They're farmers needing to be paid fair trade prices, so they have the wealth to increase their production, etc. Again, these nations are so poor that they can't respond quickly to fully take advantage of the higher prices. They lack roads and other infrastructure, so it's hard to fix all of that in a few years. Hey, we had wheat prices below full costs (USDA-ERS) every year except 3 for 35 years!
Parenti therefore, like many others, leads people toward the view of agribusiness commodity buyers, that we need to return to export dumping. I've written a blog at zspace about "25 online examples" of this, including a number here at Common Dreams. I share their values, but they miss the (US & global) farmer perspective. I've presented more of this side with regards to Parenti also, in a blog "Parenti's Bread Loaf Crunched." I give data and sources to back up the comments I've made here.