Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
What’s Up with All the Teacher Bashing?
It's hard not to take it personally: A few months ago, the cover of Newsweek
consisted of 11 sentences in chalk on a blackboard. They all said the
same thing: "We must fire bad teachers." Big yellow text in the center
called it "The Key to Saving American Education."
Teachers have always been devalued in the United States, but in the past months the pace and intensity of the attacks have escalated sharply. Spurred by the June 2 deadline for the second round of Race to the Top, states have raced to fire more teachers, tie pay and evaluation to student test scores, close or reconstitute more schools, and disempower teachers' unions and teaching as a profession-trampling teachers, students, and communities in the process.
What lies behind this unprecedented assault on teachers? And, even more important, what can we do about it? We believe that these attacks are part of an effort to dismantle public education and that we need an effective, collaborative strategy to combat it.
But let's start with what isn't going on. In virtually the same words used to sell No Child Left Behind in the early years of Bush II, the attacks on teachers are phrased in terms of "closing the achievement gap." In fact, the first paragraph of Newsweek's "Why We Can't Get Rid of Failing Teachers" story concludes: "Within the United States, the achievement gap between white students and poor and minority students stubbornly persists-and as the population of disadvantaged students grows, overall scores continue to sag." It would be nice if Newsweek were suddenly worried about how race and class affect student success. But these diatribes against teachers are not based in a commitment to equity.
No, if closing the achievement gap were the goal, we would see demands for adequate, equitable resources and funding for every student in every school-demands, for example, for quality early childhood education programs, full-time librarians, robust arts and physical education programs, mandated caps on class size, and enough time for teachers to prepare and collaborate. We would also see a renewed commitment to affirmative action in university admissions; a drive to recruit and nurture teachers of color; a commitment to ensure that students come to school ready to learn because their families have housing, food, medical care, and jobs; and an end to zero tolerance discipline policies that criminalize youth.
But if these attacks on teachers aren't about ending the systemic racism that continues to undermine our education system, what is the goal? With forces as seemingly disparate as the Obama administration, the Walton Foundation, the late Milton Friedman, and the New York Times all pushing the same ideas, this is a complicated question, but there are at least two major goals: destroy the power of the teachers' unions, and turn the public school system from a public trust into a new market for corporate development. From the time of Reagan, who used his "welfare queen" stories to scapegoat the poor as a basis on which to destroy the welfare system, this has been a tried-and-true approach to privatization: use visceral anecdotes to whip up hysteria that a system is "broken," argue that only market competition can fix the situation, and then sell off pieces of the public sector to private corporations. This time, teachers are the scapegoats.
So it's no accident that a major thrust of the media and political campaign has been the elimination of teacher tenure, which is blamed for making it hard to fire "bad" teachers. Everyone-as student, parent, or colleague-has felt the impact of teachers who should not be in the classroom. But don't blame tenure. Tenure is not a guaranteed job for life; it's the right, which all employees deserve, not to be fired without due process and without just cause. If the goal were really better teaching, Race to the Top would be promoting union/district peer review and mentoring programs that are effective in helping struggling teachers and removing those who can't make the grade. Instead, President Obama and Secretary of Education Duncan have made linking retention and salaries to test scores a precondition for Race to the Top funds, and encouraged states to break the power of teachers' unions.
The attacks on tenure are, in fact, essentially attacks on the teachers' unions. Despite their problems, teachers' unions are one of the few remaining bulwarks of organized labor. They are the only protection for teachers' rights and, at their best, facilitate teachers joining forces with parents and students to fight for equitable, forward-thinking schools that meet the needs of communities and the future.
Teacher tenure-at both the K-12 and university level-is enormously important, not just to individual teachers, but also to society as a whole. Tenure is protection against shortsighted or vindictive administrators. Tenure is what enables teachers to collaborate with each other instead of competing, to speak up for the rights of students, and to fight for justice in the classroom, the school community, and the larger community that the school serves.
"Bad teachers" are being used as the excuse to turn schools into one more arena for corporate development. First Hurricane Katrina provided the context in New Orleans for firing all unionized teachers and replacing most of the public education system with market-driven charter schools. Now this phony "crisis of bad teachers," piled atop the economic crisis, is supposedly the reason to dismantle much of the country's commitment to public education. Just in the past few months, both Obama and Duncan publicly applauded the firing of every teacher at a Rhode Island high school; Detroit Public Schools Emergency Financial Manager Robert Bobb announced plans to close another 44 schools in that city and replace them with non-union private and semiprivate charters; and the Florida legislature voted to eliminate teacher tenure entirely and revoke credentials based on standardized test scores.
Teachers, teachers' unions, and public education itself are under serious threat. It's vital that we build alliances with everyone who stands to lose from these assaults on public education.
And obviously teachers aren't the only ones under attack. The most vulnerable to the impact of privatization are students, whose education has become progressively more circumscribed and rigid. Increased reliance on exit exams and zero tolerance discipline policies have led to increasing rates of suspension, expulsion, and dropouts.
Also under attack are parents and communities. African American, Latino, and immigrant communities have always been distinguished by their commitment to education as central to the democratic process and to the success of their children. When mayoral or gubernatorial control of schools eliminates local school boards, parents and community members lose their ability to hold schools accountable.
Teachers can defend themselves from this hailstorm of criticism only if they make common cause with everyone who has a stake in defending-and transforming-public schools. In this struggle, teachers and parents need each other. But building successful coalitions and strategies takes hard work. Many parents, particularly parents of color, are angry and frustrated by long-term dysfunctions in schools that make it difficult for their children to learn and succeed. Anything that brings more accountability-from standardized tests to mayoral control-can seem better than the status quo. Teachers too often see the families and communities from which their students come as obstacles to overcome. But successful teaching and successful organizing are based on recognizing the strengths inherent in families and communities.
The survival of public education depends on our ability to grasp these larger truths. For all their faults, public schools are at the center of building democracy, community by community, from the ground up. It's going to take all of us working together to save them and turn them into institutions that promote democracy and empower youth-all our youth.
When parents, students, and teachers have worked together, we have been able to protect our schools and begin to transform them. Deluged with "Stop this bill" messages, demonstrations, and walkouts, Florida's Republican governor vetoed the anti-teacher, anti-education bill passed by the Florida legislature. Student-led community demonstrations for immigrant rights, the successful campaign to fend off mayoral control in Milwaukee, and the grassroots efforts to save teacher jobs and control the charter process in Los Angeles are other recent examples. If there were ever a time to overcome divisions and fight together for strong, equitable schools, this is it.
- Posted in



118 Comments so far
Show AllThis would take volumes to respond to since it has been
documented for at least forty years the attack on public
education and the teachers union.
COLLUSION between the two parties playing bad guy, good guy
was never more evident than the so called Health Care Reform
Act.
The Repubs acted the obstructionists, claiming that this
bill would break the bank and nothing but more government
wasteful spending on social programs, all the while knowing
what the bill was really a hand out to the Pharms and Ins
Companies...This allowed them to put on a show for convservative constituents that want to freeze government
spending....In the end these Conservative lawmakers got
exactly the Health Care Bill they wanted for their lobbyist
friends.
The Dems did just the oppisite, pretended that this bill
was going to bring health care to the American Public, in
the end, the dem lawmakers got what they wanted too, the
same thing the Republican Lawmakers wanted.
THIS IS COLLUSION..both parties working together to the same
ends, while at the same time making it appear they aren't.
THIS HAS BEEN DONE WITH EDUCATION FOR FORTY YEARS.
COLLUSION, COLLUSION, COLLUSION,,between Dems and PUbs.
However, if you look at the Santions Act passed last week,
look how bipartisian it passed
99 - 0 Senate
408 - 8 House......
They sure aren't partisian when it comes to illegal wars.
By the time Obama completes his first term he will sign more Republican legislation than most two term Republican presidents signed.
Obamacare is a reheated 1990s Republican program with extra corporate welfare and a couple of trinkets for the masses tossed in.
Obama is the best Republican the Democrats ever had.
Duncan accelerated miltary recruitment in the Chicago public schools when he was running that show, so we know what his next move will be.
You got that right!!
Teachers are given an impossible job in a corrupt educational system and are then persecuted for their 'failures'. It's all part of the right-wing anti-'socialism' policy. Also part of the general decline of the US.
Rewarding criminals and punishing their victims is embedded in the fiber of US culture.
Yes.
Joe
Blaming teachers, firing them, and replacing them with lower paid functionaries is a course of action that is cheap. That is the bottom line: cheap. So is insisting that "student achievement" can be measured with tests and that test scores measure the worth of teachers. Tests are cheaper than providing decent facilities, textbooks, equipment, professional development experiences to teachers. They are cheaper than overhauling the curriculum to make it relevant to students' needs. They are cheaper than lowering class size to a reasonable level. They are cheaper than paying beginning teachers a fair wage and paying for graduate degrees. This is not primarily about busting unions but about posturing. Politicians want to tout all they are doing to improve education without spending a buck. That is what Race to the Top is all about--getting "reform" on the cheap, only it isn't reform in the first place--only a despicable sham.
Unsurprisingly, the ConDem government over here is launching an identical attack. The BBC, ever happy to serve the State, just broadcast a programme exposing the "scandal" that "bad" teachers could not be sacked.
In the late 80s I recall the push by Whittle Communications to wedge their way into schools with the "Channel 1" program. "Here, we're going to give your school all these new TVs and other media stuff but only if you force your students to watch several minutes of our 'news programming.'" Of course the news programming had little to do with journalism and everything to do with the assorted commercials to push sugary cereals and designer jeans. Whittle is out of the picture now but, big shock, NBC and CBS have partnered with Channel 1. There is more on the Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel_One_News
Oh, yes. Channel One became part of the morning mandatory ritual ---- the pledge of allegiance (with punishment for any hint of disrespect), the moment of silence (because they couldn't quite force us to mumble some generic Christian prayer), and then the mindless news punctuated with loud commercials. Try following that inanity with something like the Greek tragedies or Kafka or, with no hint of irony, Huxley's Brave New World.
For years I always had first period as a planning period because of my refusal to follow the ritual, including my refusal to recite the pledge. On second thought, I now remember that the administration was more concerned about my refusal to keep the TV plugged in (Channel One came on automatically) because Whittle would take away my free TV.
what is the goal, the underlying purpose of life?
we have yet to answer that question...and it shows...
why educate wrongly in the meantime?
figure out how man can live harmoniously with each other and the rest of the living world, without owning and destroying all things, then teach how to do so...
until then, close the schools, as they, as a source of programming that ultimately devastates the entire living world, are a problem, not a solution...
schools are but means to a bad end...
don't take comments regarding teaching personally, as they are misguided...the whole system is rotten...teaching would have to suffer from association...
Are you an anarcho-primitivist?
My public school teachers introduced me to Kurt Vonnegut and Joseph Heller and Arthur Miller, and my natural scinece teachers introduced me to wonders of the earth and it's biosphere. My math and physics teachers introduced me the deep and sublime order behind physical being.
If you didn't get anything out of school, that's your probelem. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
hey, sabocat!
Main Entry: an·ar·chy
Pronunciation: \ˈa-nər-kē, -ˌnär-\
Function: noun
Etymology: Medieval Latin anarchia, from Greek, from anarchos having no ruler, from an- + archos ruler — more at arch-
Date: 1539
1 a : absence of government b : a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority c : a utopian society of individuals who enjoy complete freedom without government
2 a : absence or denial of any authority or established order b : absence of order : disorder
3 : anarchism
Main Entry: 1prim·i·tive
Pronunciation: \ˈpri-mə-tiv\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English primitif, from Latin primitivus first formed, from primitiae first fruits, from primus first — more at prime
Date: 14th century
1 a : not derived : original, primary b : assumed as a basis; especially : axiomatic
2 a : of or relating to the earliest age or period : primeval b : closely approximating an early ancestral type : little evolved c : belonging to or characteristic of an early stage of development : crude, rudimentary d : of, relating to, or constituting the assumed parent speech of related languages
3 a : elemental, natural b : of, relating to, or produced by a people or culture that is nonindustrial and often nonliterate and tribal c : naive d (1) : self-taught, untutored (2) : produced by a self-taught artist
hmmm...anarcho-primitivist...perhaps I am...as if things would be worse (and they're not as bad as they're going to get under our current system yet, either)
In light of ongoing planetary destruction, what successful alternative philosophy do you proselytize? Managed capitalism?
I love Vonnegut...what has he taught you regarding the concept of private property?
I love math and physics...what do they teach about toxifying finite vital resources, addressing political deception and financial indenture, or dealing with violent attackers in your home or neighborhood?
What did you learn in school regarding how to identify, or secure and prepare, the naturally-occurring plants and animals in your immediate area that are good to eat, or useful for building shelter?
You never addressed my question about life's goal and purpose...
What baby would you save from the bathwater's fate?
Interesting to sit on cancerous, desertifying islands of industrial garbage and murder victims, surrounded by an increasingly lifeless and toxic soup of liquids and gases, consuming whatever petroleum provides, screaming the praises of science and literature, and making fun of anarcho-primitivists...
Correction.
You are an anarcho-nihilist...
The answer to the question of the meaning of life is 42.
- Douglas Adams
Main Entry: ni·hil·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈnī-(h)ə-ˌli-zəm, ˈnē-\
Function: noun
Etymology: German Nihilismus, from Latin nihil nothing — more at nil
Date: circa 1817
1 a : a viewpoint that traditional values and beliefs are unfounded and that existence is senseless and useless b : a doctrine that denies any objective ground of truth and especially of moral truths
2 a : a doctrine or belief that conditions in the social organization are so bad as to make destruction desirable for its own sake independent of any constructive program or possibility b capitalized : the program of a 19th century Russian party advocating revolutionary reform and using terrorism and assassination
— ni·hil·ist \-list\ noun or adjective
— ni·hil·is·tic \ˌnī-(h)ə-ˈlis-tik, ˌnē-\ adjective
I believe I will agree...I am an anarcho-nihilist, for now...or close enough...
What are you?
What is a dolphin?
yes, I read Douglas Adams...better than some, not as good as others...
I liked his bit about flying by just missing the ground...nice idea...I have flying dreams, sometimes, and this notion reminded me of them...
Speaking of Vonnegut, do you know that near the end of his life, he suggested that humans may have been an evolutionary mistake? That's not an accurate interpretation perhaps of what he said; the point is he had given up on us. So very sad. I can tell you very few students read Vonnegut today; he's been replaced by graphic novels and vampires.
Trust me, I'm still on topic.
vampires are naturally aggressive, extremely effective recruiters...and exponentially so...
they 'convert' two friends, and they 'convert' two friends, and so on, and so on, and so on...
like recommending a hair color, or buying members of congress...
did the recent vampire thing start with Buffy? Her show was fun...great hair colors, too...hey, Willow!
interactive media has superseded books...
quiet, personal 'downtime'...time to contemplate, evaluate, muse...is largely missing, or difficult to achieve...getting rid of tv helps, but phones and media are still ubiquitous, and active around the clock...
Why, in business, if a business does poorly, the management is fired; but, in education, if the school does poorly, the administrators are not fired, the teachers are. It makes no sense.
If a school does poorly, FIRE THE ADMINISTRATORS !!!
They keep adding MORE layers of highly paid administrators at schools ranging from K-8 to universities.
Who is "they"? Do you have evidence that more administrators are being hired now as opposed to, say, ten years ago?
Fire the Administrators not the teachers. That is the point.
No doubt that there are some atrocious administrators. I've seen too many. But the fact is that in public education there is a supervisor (administrator) for every 20 or so employees (teachers and staff) whereas in the private sector (business) the ratio is one supervisor for every five employees. Who is more efficient?? Generally speaking what I find with administrators is that they are so worried about keeping their jobs, i.e., salaries, that they go along with whatever the powers to be say. No tienen cojones! (They don't have any balls)
OYE
The Ruling Class fears and hates unions as much as it fears and hates citizens who think for themselves and question unfair authority and injustice. Unions have historically increased the numbers of people in the middle class, meaning less wealth for the greedy Ruling Class. That's why unions must be demonized and crushed, especially teachers' unions.
Teachers who challenge their students to think instead of merely teaching them to pass state-mandated tests are especially dangerous to the Ruling Class. I managed to get away with that kind of public school teaching - challenging my students to think - for 32 years before retiring. Tenure enabled me to continue for that long, along with being fortunate to teach in a relatively enlightened school district.
The Empire needs unquestioning drones so desperate for any kind of job with benefits that they will enlist in the endless, imperial wars of aggression which keep the Corporatist-Militarist State's Rulers powerful and wealthy. Either that, or put them, especially those with darker skin and Hispanic accents, into the growing number of private prisons built especially to hold those who refuse to conform, while generating even more profits for the Prison-Industrial Complex.
Privatize the military (Xe, etc.), privatize education, privatize formerly public infrastructure, privatize everything except citizen bailouts of Wall Street and "Health" Insurance, and you remove any fragment of citizen control. Then you can have what we now have: the APPEARANCE of "democracy" covering the reality of a Corporatist-Militarist Death State. Meanwhile, corporate media, the Ministry of Propaganda for the Death State, will continue to mislead, lie, and distract most of us so we won't notice what the Ruling Class is doing.
So our public schools will be turned into "academies of apathy", charter schools teaching to the increasing number of mind-numbing tests and privately financed by center-right groups which will take for their model the Texas School Board, brainwashing students to support the Empire, no matter what war crimes and atrocities it commits, under the banner of "patriotism" and "Christianity", as the denied anthropogenic climate change increasingly makes life unlivable for billions of people and other species on the planet. As long as the Empire's Ruling Class is comfortable, our students, jobless workers, and increasing numbers of prison inmates need not concern their ignorant little heads about it all.
Thanks, ED, for this excellent post. I'm surprised at all the comments that miss the primary motivation behind teacher bashing:
crushing the unions.
ED,
Excellent commentary!
OYE
In Rhode island, I heard NPR, which is getting as bad as CNN or MSNBC, bashing the teacher's union that would not get on board with "race to the top," and praising the "progressive" union that did. All I can say is, at this point, is F NPR and F the Obama administration right wingers.
Race to the top my a*****
It's sad that the result of this war on teachers will be a workforce, and an electorate, fit only to perform menial and often dangerous jobs. In a few more years, there will be large and compliant workforce, enabling transnationals to relocate to far-off, third-world places like ... any of the Bible Belt states with sufficient road and rail infrastructure. With no knowledge of history, much less labor movements, the workforce/electorate will be happy to glue sneakers, sew underwear, or assemble electronics. The US will be happily returned to the late 19th and early 20th version of itself - a few robber barons controlling what's left of the economy, and a government dedicated to maintain the new status quo.
It's not only sad, it's designed that way.
I agree with your post. I think the enforced ignorance of fundamentalist Christianity (creationism, anti-intellectualism etc.) is sort of a neo-feudalism, in that the mass of society will accept, rather than fight against, a very unjust society because it's the "will of God".
I have long been a supporter of 'cooperative education' over 'cometitive education' which the public school system is based upon. SOME public school teachers ignore the trendy new methods and rely on 'tried and true' methods of getting students to take pride and partnership with their education. Promoting group problem solving and group game playing more often result in group successes.
One sad truth is that we've come to expect our teaching staff to fulfill the job of baby sitting students too pampered to be responsible for self motivation and those not capable of learning. Trying to "mainstream" ALL of the children with physical and mental impairments has cost the average and advanced student to opportunity for individual recognition, when needed. Trying to educate a capable student whose parents threaten law suits at the hint of a harsh word is worse.
SOME teachers "probably" need firing. Most however, tend to be consciencious, caring people, hobbled by the myriad of laws, rules and regulations. Do this, don't do that and oh by the way, if your students fail the test, you're a bad person and a bad teacher. OF COURSE any teacher would teach to the test under these conditions. I'm one of "them" who'd like to see all federal regulations pertaining to education abolished and allow the states to educate their youth. The student with an IQ of 85 will probably not do as well as the student with an IQ of 130, so stop trying to make them equal.
IF one looks up the word "fair", one will find that it not only includes "everyone treated the same", but also includes "giving to each individual that which the individual needs" (not necessarily the 'same'). We can not have a 'fair' educational system with truncating the extremes. (just an opinion)
And what is the rest of society, i.e. the judgmental government, doing to create a society in which it is meaningful to be an educated citizen? I mean, if Obama's EPA or Interior departments are any indication of what is at the "top" (let alone the Treasury and the Fed), the educators have no choice but to feed their students lots and lots of Vonnegut, Orwell, Pynchon, Nietzsche, and Marx, along with a side dish of cynicism about the educational theory favor of the week and the latest standardized test.
Let the revolution begin in the classroom with smart, unionized, rebellious, authority-defying teachers!
My point is that the FEDERAL government should set NO STANDARDS. period. STATES should determine the standards. If a student in Idaho does less well in English comprehension than a student in Maine, so what? Economics and local industrialization will determine to a great extent where each state will place it's emphasis. The federal government will make a pea soup sandwhich starting with a fine roast and potatoes.
Schools used to teach students to read IN FRONT OF THE CLASS. This also taught public speaking and citizenship (without having classes NAMED as such). Schools used to teach students to do basic math, albeit often by rote, so that one could add up a restaurant bill without the aid of a calculator. Schools used to teach all students basic CIVICS, the way the government is designed to operate and the rights and responsibilities that come with citizenship.
I feel your response may be a bit naive, though I have nothing against unionized teachers (I still belong to a union). I do object to the "authority-defying" portion of your postulate however. QUESTIONING authority does not necessarily equate to 'defying' authority. Some of the old methods are far superior to the newer ones in my opinion. Yes, some authority may have to be defied, but as the final step, not the first. The amount of 'rebellion' should be age appropriate, in my opinion. "TEACHING" a child to be rebellous will not further his/her ability to obtain and maintain a job on the open market. And, as far as being "smart", well all I can say that "the truth" at age sixty plus is a bit different that "the truth" was at age twenty two.
Too many "teachers" make the mistake of believing that if a concept is presented, the student will not only understand it, but will understand the consequences of adhering to such a concept. They fail to discuss however, the "appropriatness" of certain actions within given parameters. The recent execution of the police officers by a youth when his father was stopped (and subsequent deaths of both the father and son) are examples of this. The concept of "sovereign citizens" is neither new (the UN has recognized this concept since WW II), nor extreme. The use of a firearm IS extreme and inappropriate. My example is acute, yes, but the lesson should be "a LITTLE bit of knowledge can be a very dangerous thing".
Some people seem unwilling to admit that there are some very bad teachers out there -- English teachers that cannot effectively speak or write English, for example.
yes, and there are some very bad engineers, and very bad bankers, and very bad auto mechanics, and very bad plumbers, and very bad accountants. Many of them never get fired either - often becasue they own the business. There is incompetence everywhere - especially, in my experience, in private "enterprise" (has anyone in the upper ranks of BP been fired yet?). So, what is your point?
The point? The article deals with teachers, not engineers, bankers, auto techs, plumbers or accountants. What is YOUR point?
His point is well taken. When it comes to teachers everyone uses a blanket statement "there are incompetent teachers" and with that slogen they feel the authority to pass judement. While there are incompetent teachers there are also incompetent parents, siblings, religious leaders and so on, we have a choice we make them better or change them for better ones. Dismantleing the system is simply not an option.
Teachers and other public service employees are an easy target because the taxpayers are their supposed boss. The right knows that it can turn the rage out here against these folks in a time when millions cannot find work let alone decent work. Why? Because the right owns the jobs, the land and the political system and they want the Dims. out of power again and fast. The Class War they've been fighting against the rest of us for 30 yrs. is now in high gear and the gloves are off. It's time as they see it to smash what's left of 100 yrs. of so called social progress. They've already succeeded in destroying the private labor union movement to where only 7% of workers have Unions representing them and now it's the public service unions turn. My predictionis by 2012 the GOP will have Congress and the WH again and we will see the end of SS and Medicare as we know it and we can thank the DIMOwits for all of this because they have blown it! They've done everything and anything to kick the crap out of the very people who have elected them and now they will watch in horror as their own base stays home and the tea baggers and other brown shirts of the radical Corporatist right take back over. So much for CHange and hope hello to CLASS WARFARE 24/7.
Part of the madness behind the attack on teacher tenure is I believe to allow teachers to be fired who refuse to for instance, teach creationism as fact in schools and other conservative revisions of history and science. The other effect will be in creating a two tiered school system even more so, with poor neighbourhood schools being badly funded as the system will respond to the poor performance there to further cutting their funding, it just completely ignores the underlying economic and social problems, we will end up with most resources going to the rich neighbourhood schools and no teacher would want to teach in the poor neighbourhoods. The issues effecting student grades is out of teachers control, such as the economic conditions at home, the fact the children may be homeless,l without food and water, all as well thanks to Republicans policies and their serve the rich elitism.
ervadaras,
Another insightful commentary!
OYE
I taught middle school science for thirty years. The science scores for students at my school were consistently poor. I didn't care. I'm proud of my career.
I worked hard, had SOME influence, and now wouldn't go near a school building on a bet.
I will never know the value of my contribution. It might have been great or small but it was mine.
The best teachers in the world are not going to entice students who are immersed in a commercial culture that belittles the natural and physical science, math and literature.
I hope you can remember the talented students who did take an interest in your subjects. Most of them were probably outcast aspergers kids of varying degrees, werent they?
They were indeed unpopular, non-cliquish, able to put facts together into models that could predict the shit storm we are now suffering.
This may be partly a class-warfare thing.
Our government and media are completely run by the Merchant class, which hates the other classes of society and lives to rip them off. The Republican Revolution was essentially the business class setting themselves up to screw the other classes, which they have successfully done.
Even with the internet, most of the ideas we hear in America come straight from the business class--and our business class hate education in general and teachers in particular. The less the citizens know, the better capitalism works.
The Merchant class in America have gone bad. They think they're the super-race and have declared war on their fellow citizens.
Yes, and continuing on the theme of my earlier comments, something I've always noticed about the US merchant/business-class is their complete lack of cultural interests (GWB was a classic in this regard). They truly hate science, art, literature - anything that opens up person's mind up (outside the obscure field of solid-state quantum physics that underlies the junk they addict the population to)
So of course we have the schools we have.
Wasn't it Goehring who said: "When I hear the word "culture" I reach for my Luger".
That's a little harsh as one who was once one of those merchants. Let me tell u how it looks from the side of a small business guy and maybe you'll understand why teachers are indeed being scapegoated and will lose this fight. The elites of the BIG BIZ class do as you say HATE teachers and Professors ( except for the Chicago school and Harvard AKA the elite business schools) and they intend to turn up the Class war big time now that they see that Obama is one of them not the rest of us. But, first understand this friend. I as a small business guy in a good yr. barely made what a starting teacher in my State now earns and that's without his/her benefits he or she works maybe 9 mos. gets almost full medical and a nice pension after 20 or 25 yrs. of service. Fair enough, but here's the rub while teacher, fire fighters, police et. al. have been getting 3 and 4% increases etc etc. every yr. for the last 30 the rest of us in the small private sector have watched our businesses gutted and our opportunities shrinking along with watching our middle class life style vanish. WE the small business guy/gal are the new poor. We then are having the teachers etc. shoved in our face by the elite to mock and humilate us and the average private worker as well. The desired result is to break up the Unions what's left of them and turn what's left of the middle class against each other. It's going to work , maybe! The ultimate goal is to get THEIR tribe the GOP back in the saddle in DC. Obama and his crowd the DINOcrats stupidly are playing right along to their tune hoping if they are seen as just as right wing the GOP and Indie voters might buy them in the fall. NOT going to happen and were facing another 12 yrs. of GOP rule. This could have been averted had Obama acted like FDR instead of HOOVER. Now it's too late and were all going to watch in horror as the Public sector is decimated as was the private and the country nose dives into the 2nd great Depression within months. Great for the top 2% who will see the disaster for the rest of us another buying opportunity. Another reason why it will work is simple. We all know teachers and cops and fire fighters etc. but how many of us know Wall st. banksters? These are a rare breed only seen in NYC and a few other elite locales. Teachers can be hated and scapegoated much easier because we know them and better yet many of us still harbor deep resentments against particular ones long in the past. The GOP and the right knows all this and they are cleverly using it all to destroy the Public school system and turn it into another Profit center like so called Health reform etc. etc. etc...
"WE the small business guy/gal are the new poor. We then are having the teachers etc. shoved in our face by the elite to mock and humilate us and the average private worker as well."
Can you elaborate? They are mocking and humiliating the public workers, not the private workers and small business persons.
As far as "small business" that is a vaguely defined a thing as "middle class". A number of people I know who call themselves "small businessmen" are fabulously rich by my government-worker standards, then there are the onwers of the small urban shops and bars in my area. They aren't doing very well. They aren't doing very well becasue the big boxes and chains are stealing their business.
Corporate elites hate an educated populace!
Sort of. What they really hate is a populace that thinks for itself. The US populace is (still) actually relatively highly educated, yet it also displays an appalling degree of conformity.
TL; You have hit it right on the target and think back to the last 50 years or so and it can be seen coming to this. To me it is a question of which comes first; parents or teachers? A student without curiosity is a waste in class, yet where does he get this curiosity; in school, at home, from his/her own mind? The ones who do not have this curiosity are the ones that will and do well in the new "learning". As for the poor,others who care if their child can think for themselves and the teachers who are being railroaded the author is correct in stating that it is a war where the odds are stacked against any justice for teachers or students who must be able to think. The plan is for robots not students. You program robots, you teach students
The main way that I have experienced "bad" teachers has been regarding teachers who pay no mind to whether a student is excelerating or performing poorly in their class. Many high school teachers, in my experience, did not talk to a student if they were doing poorly and advise them to seek a tutor. Students just fell behind and the teacher paid this no regard.
If teachers are viewing their students simply as warm bodies filling their classrooms, and not working to make sure ALL of their students are able to keep up with the material,then they are performing poorly as teachers.
It is the teacher's job to assure students learn the material- whether that means setting them up with a tutor, or meeting with parents to gain their involvement etc.