Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Published on Monday, May 9, 2011 by CommonDreams.org
Daniel Berrigan: A Lifetime of Peace Activism
Jingoistic crowds erupted with frat-boy glee shortly after President Barack Obama announced the extrajudicial assassination of Osama Bin Laden earlier this month. After all, America’s public enemy Numero Uno -- our own veritable Darth Vadar – had lost what the mainstream media depicts as a Manichean battle ten years in the making. The lone voices in the wilderness that dared to point out the covert operation violated elementary norms of international law were quickly dismissed as “fanatics”. 
According to prevailing wisdom in the United States today, the best way to eradicate the world of a hateful ideology is by deploying 80 commandos on the home of an unarmed suspect and murdering him on the spot. Yet, we already see the entirely predictable consequences of the Osama bin Laden raid. In Portland, Maine, a mosque was defaced just hours after the news broke of bin Laden’s death. The graffiti read, "Osama Today, Islam tomorow" [sic]. Less than a week later, any misconception that the so-called Global War on Terror was winding down was dispelled when a drone attack killed at least eight people in Pakistan’s North Waziristan. Meanwhile Secretary of State Hillary Clinton disingenuously conflated al-Qaeda with the Taliban and, with bellicose bravado, declared the U.S. would continue its war in Afghanistan. And, in Pakistan, hundreds of Jamaat-ud-Dawa activists prayed in Karachi for their new martyr: Osama bin Laden.
Many great minds have questioned the logic of retributive violence, but perhaps none as persistently and unwaveringly as Father Daniel Berrigan. Today, the lifelong social justice activist and renegade Jesuit priest turns 90 years old. At a time when self-proclaimed Christian politicians espouse a Tea Party-inspired theology of xenophobia and vengeance, Berrigan is a rare soul that continues tirelessly opposing violence in its many forms. Along with his late brother Phillip, he has publicly opposed aid to alleged anti-Communist forces in Southeast Asia, the use of American forces in Grenada, the installation of Pershing missiles in West Germany, aid to the Contras in Nicaragua, intervention in Afghanistan during the Soviet invasion, the Cold War, and the Gulf War. Berrigan also vocally opposed the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.[1] For Berrigan, Christianity is a counter-cultural practice directly at odds with the prevailing national culture of retributive justice. Arrested more times than he can count -- but “fewer than I should have been,” Berrigan says -- he has spent over half a century digging mock graves on the Pentagon’s front lawn, pouring vials of his own blood on Capitol Hill, vandalizing army airplanes, hammering on nuclear nosecones, turning his back on judges during his sentencing hearings, staging hunger strikes in prisons, undergoing strip searches for educating his fellow inmates, and standing in court on charges ranging from “criminal mischief” to “destruction of government property” to, most egregiously, “failure to quit.” [2] Berrigan fears moral suicide over physical death and regards moral autonomy as more liberating than physical freedom.
Last year, after badgering members of the Catholic Worker community across the country, I tracked down America’s most famous living priest. When I arrived at Berrigan’s Lower West Side friary in Manhattan, I half expected to find a Bible-toting warrior, but on that clement morning, I walked into the friary’s cozy hallway to find a slightly hunched elderly man with a meek smile and skin crinkled like aluminum foil. Greeting me with the softest, gentlest “hello” that I’ve heard since my first day at Montessori school, Father Berrigan clasped my hand and led me into his tastefully decorated office. The walls of his office showcased posters of freedom fighters such as Mahatma Gandhi, a child’s drawing of a circus clown, and framed quilts of butterflies. Among his impressive collection of books are volumes by his longtime heroes: Dorothy Day, Martin Luther King Jr., and Thomas Merton. Just shy of his ninetieth birthday, Berrigan spoke with me for an hour and a half, patiently answering my many questions and stopping only twice or so to cough.
Berrigan told me of surviving a Depression-era boyhood, an abusive father, and countless wars to emerge with a startlingly simple message: stop the violence. If Berrigan had lived during slavery, he would have fought with the abolitionists, but he would not have joined John Brown in leading violent slave insurrections. Even at the height of his Vietnam antiwar activism--or, as his detractors would say, the height of his arrogance--Berrigan never condoned violence. A tape-recorded message to the Weatherman Underground, attributed to Berrigan in 1971, pleads with the militant group to return to nonviolence, warning,: “No principle is worth the sacrifice of a single human being.”
In a world still wracked by violence, Berrigan’s peace testimony remains largely unheard and his pacifist views are too often dismissed as naïve. As we celebrate his lifelong commitment to social justice activism on his birthday, may we remember his startlingly clear message that violence is not the answer even when it’s seems most tempting and most justified. As Berrigan and so many others have noted, our convictions matter most when they’re tested on the crucible of life -- not when they are easy, safe, and fashionable. If we believe in a world in which international law triumphs over unilateral action; mercy triumphs over vengeance; and clemency over sacrifice then Berrigan’s lifelong testimony teaches us that there are no exceptions.
Notes:
[1] Joe Sabia, “The Cornell Catholic Community is in Crisis” Cornell Daily Sun. September 23, 2003
[2] For more see Gary Smith, “Peace Warriors,” The Washington Post Magazine, June 5, 1988, W22. June 5, 1988.
Comments are closed


19 Comments so far
Show AllI thanked him personally about ten years ago.
However, since then, i found that he called for an international boycott of Amenesty International for supporting women in horrific circumstances, thirteen year old girls who were raped as an act of genocide in Rwanda. This was about three years ago. This anti female stance and complete lack of ability to feel empathy and compassion nauseated me and i realized that the Vatican is strong within even this man. And, contempt for the 'feminine' is the mainstay of the Church.
Feel free to insult me, come one, come all. Please. Defend his action against A.I. It wasn't just Berrigan of course, but many clergy throughout the world. But i have never heard any of these men call for a boycott of the Church, because of child abuse. Have you?
I had thought that Jesus said,, that one should look at one's own house, before they throw stones. When one is a member of a 2,000 year old empire...........
That said. Yes. He has done good work. But can't go beyond the patriarchal mindset of the world's oldest empire.
I was very saddened when i learned of his strong stance against AI due to this single issue. When i consulted a good friend, who knew him well - a man who is a professor at Marquette U. and a former Jesuit priest, he told me that this was not at all surprising to him. That the mysogeny runs deep within the clergy and takes a myriad of forms. Yes, everyone has something we can point to. Agreed. But as i said here, disdain of the 'feminine' is the root of the emperial war machine. You can throw blood on bombs and get arrested til doomsday, and it doesn't matter one whit if you force little girls to have babies with aids and be cast out of their families and become untouchables because your organization wants to control female bodies.
That still makes you part of the bigger problem.
rita
rita
Thanks, Rita, for your post! Very well said!!
If anyone requires documentation, follow these links:
http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/politics/Vatican-Tells-Catholics-to-End-Aid-to-Amnesty.html
http://www.ncregister.com/site/article/2904
Thank you Kay Johnson!
Some of us prefer documentation even when we don't require it. Having a good sense of whatever the facts appear to be as reported by others helps each of us in our effort to really understand what is going on.
Here is an excerpt from the article from the National Catholic Reporter which you linked directly in you post and which was linked in the documentation provided by findingDulcinea for which you also kindly provided us a link.
- - - - -
Excerpt from "No Amnesty For the Unborn", by Tom McFeely, National Catholic Reporter, June 12, 2007.
Father Berrigan said he first became acquainted with Amnesty’s work in the 1960s, when the newly formed group launched a campaign on behalf of Archbishop Josef Beran of Prague, who was imprisoned by Czechoslovakia’s Communist government after he spoke out against government abuses.
“I was very moved with the international activity on behalf of powerless people,” Father Berrigan said. And, he added, no one is more powerless than unborn children in the womb who are at risk of being killed by abortion.
Father Berrigan emphatically agreed with Cardinal Martino’s statement that individual Catholics and Catholic organizations should withdraw all support for Amnesty International if it doesn’t reverse its decision to advocate for abortion rights.
“I’ve supported over the years Amnesty’s take on prisoners of conscience around the world, and have been a member of Amnesty,” he said. “And I was quite shaken by this change.”
- -
NCR Article URL: www.ncregister.com/site/article/2904
Thank you Kay, for your support and providing the links.
I wrote a piece about this that got around at the time, and was in fact, published here on CD. I don't post links in these comments since i am so remedial i don't cut and paste much. That is a confession for you right here! A luddite am i........But i figure people can easily look things up on their own, if so inclined. That is how i do it. I have invented my own little meathods. Got to get inventive when lacking technical know how. ;-)
warm regards,
rita
While I disagree with Dan Berrigan's position regarding abortion, you really have to accept that it has nothing to do with misogyny, but rather he is simply adhering to the overly-consistent "seamless cloth doctrine" that states that one can not oppose war, violence and executions without also opposing abortion.
And, I can assure you at least as many women oppose abortion from their moral convictions as men.
As I wrote, I fully support access to abortion in the first two trimesters.
And it is not the church that is comitting the sexual abuse, it is individual priests - who of course should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, the Vatican has expressed their comittment to such, and like all media-sensationalized crime, is not nearly as common as the coverage suggests.
When are people going to start boycotting and picketing synagogues and University Hillel centers over what Israel is doing?
As far as being an antizionist, jewish activist......There are many, myself included. I will be at the AIPAC conference, protesting in less than two weeks. Also i have indeed stood outside of synagogues. Although, israel is not the equivalent of the Vatican, by the way. It simply isn't. However,
I haven't heard from the activist priests that pedophiles be prosecuted and the root causes, which is in fact anti sexuality and nature, be questioned, since it is the only thing this church has as a control issue. Oh, yes. The media really hypes this abomination? It had been covered up for over a thousand years. And still is. And the Vatican's expression of commitment to rooting out child abusers in the clergy? I have not heard of anything new regarding this. And in fact, this pope has refused to testify, since he himself wrote a letter to the bishops of the world, to cover it up. This appeared in the Guardian. You can look it up. He was subpeonaed and claimed diplomatic amnesty, which the u.s. granted him. You can look that up as well.
But in all sincerity, thank you for a thoughtful response.
My own feeling is that the root causes of pedophilia in the priesthood is the celibacy requirement for priesthood. Pedophilia is a lifelong, refractory, personality disorder, and I beleive that the priesthood attracts pedophiliacs becasue by entering the celibate priesthood, they hope to escape their demons.
For a very similar reason, the priesthood is disproportionately represented by gay men, although with increasing social acdceptance of gay men, this is probably declining.
The elimination of the stupid celibacy requirement, along with allowing women into the priesthood, would solve the problem.
In my own humble opinion here, i don't see the Church changing the celebacy requirement, since the idea is to be loyal first and foremost to the church itself, as a living entity. As far as women clergy are concerned, i don't see that happening either. With these changes, it would no longer be different enough to make it unique. It would be like saying that women are equally close to 'God' as men and that sexuality is condoned.
I spoke to a woman recently who said that her grandmother, who grew up in a small Italian town, told her children to not allow their siblings to be alone with any priests. This was passed down to the woman i spoke with by her own mother. She was told to never leave her younger brother alone with the priest. It turned out that this was simply known in the town where her grandmother was raised. People just watched out for their kids. But no one questioned it or thought anything of it. It was simply accepted as part of Catholic life. And my client (the woman i mentioned), never even thought much about it. She simply kept watch for her brother.
I have always wondered why a fetus is given more value in the Church, than, say, a young woman's life. That has been my observation, anyway.
Peace.
"Pedophilia is a lifelong, refractory, personality disorder, and I beleive that the priesthood attracts pedophiliacs because by entering the celibate priesthood, they hope to escape their demons." -- pjd412
Did you consider that the the priests who are afflicted with pedophilia might be preying upon children, using their authority and position as "father" and priest to take advantage of those in their care?
Father Oliver O'Grady used his position to rape both girls and boys. Church officials knew and did nothing except to send him to new cities where he sexually assualted/raped more young girls and boys. Years later, when Catholic Church officials were confronted, one of the points the authorities made was that it was more natural for a man to be attracted to a girl than a boy, and therefore, not as bad if a girl is raped. The youngest girl raped was a nine-month-old baby. This is natural in the eyes of the Bishop? Church officials considered the rapes of boys to be UN-natural.
I recommend the 2006 documentary -- Deliver Us From Evil.
Not long ago, I loaned my DVD copy to a friend of mine and his girlfriend, who is, or was, Catholic. She told him that kids knew which priests weren't safe, and which priests were OK. As Rita pointed out in one of her posts, even though people knew, they didn't think much about it -- other than to watch out for each other whenever possible.
Thanks, PuffinThrush, for your comments!
Progressives this is an article about a true progressive and a Catholic theist. It wouldn't matter if he had been an atheist.
We need to recognize this.
Jean Paul Sartre was a progressive and an atheist, and we shouldn't in the least trash him for that anymore than we should trash this or that theist religion. I specifiy theist religion because not all religions require people to be theists. Unitarian Universalists don't.
It is not my intention to trash Father Berrigan. Through the years, I have been in awe of his brave stand for peace and social justice. I respect him for standing up to the Empire of Illusion and for his fearless determination.
However, I took/take issue with his stand against Amnesty International. I feel and recognize NO empathy in this stand for the girls and women who have been incested and raped. Is the life of the female who is pregnant less valuable than the life of the fetus? Incest and rape are violent crimes against humanity. Girls and women are not granted choice even under these dire circumstances?
Is it their business? Do they know these girls and women? Do these men know what comprises a nine-month pregnancy? What about privacy? What about choice, especially under these circumstances? Isn't this, too, part of social justice? The girls and women did NOT choose to be raped and/or incested. Do these men own the bodies of girls and women? Do they really know best?
I have yet to recognize a religion that is not patriarchal, and hierarchal, in its formation of power.
BTW -- I'm not sure why you brought up Jean Paul Sartre, but I also have a great respect for his work. He was also an anarchist -- self-determined.
AD wrote:
Progressives this is an article about a true progressive and a Catholic theist. It wouldn't matter if he had been an atheist.
We need to recognize this.
Jean Paul Sartre was a progressive and an atheist, and we shouldn't in the least trash him for that anymore than we should trash this or that theist religion. I specifiy theist religion because not all religions require people to be theists. Unitarian Universalists don't.
* * * * *
My Reply:
I don’t think that the primarly concern here is whether or not a religion is theist or non-theist.
As I see it readytotransform (aka rita) has expressed a deep disappointment with and intense criticism of Daniel Berrigan because of Berrigan’s beliefs about abortion; since readytotransform, as do a number of other people no doubt, sees a strong connection between patriarchy, anti-abortion beliefs, and the sexual abuse of children by Catholic priests. Given that readytotransform had said she once had the opportunity to personally thank Daniel Berrigan for this peace work, I can’t describe her concerns as trashing Daniel Berrigan.
Some religions and some Christian denominations are much more hierarchical and authoritarian than others.
Significant numbers of progressive Catholics are critical of the Catholic Church regarding the Church’s stance on abortion and contraception as well as the role of women in the Church, and how seriously the Church hierarchy and lay Catholics take the preferential option for the poor, which supposedly is one of the basic principles of Catholic Social Teaching.
Similarly, two Quakers one “European American” and one “African American” have recently authored a book called “Fit for Freedom Not For Friendship: Quakers, African Americans, and the Myth of Racial Justice”. Cornel West has had this to say about the book, “The legendary status of Quakers in the struggle for Black freedom undergoes serious scrutiny and critique in this courageous and visionary book.”
“Fit for Freedom Not for Friendship” examines both the leading role some Quakers took in the struggle for freedom of slaves (referred to as enslaved people in the book), as well as the passive racism and complacency of many Quakers regarding slavery (referred to as enslavement in the book), and the actual enslavement by Quaker slave owners (referred to as enslavers in the book) of people of African descent. On the whole I believe this book has been well received in the Quaker community, despite the honest telling of a history that moves far beyond mythology and hardly stands as an untainted source of pride for members of the Religious Society of Friends.
This sort of honesty is difficult enough within a community of people whether they be Catholics or Quakers; but is particularly difficult between different communities of people.
Daniel Berrigan was a radical priest who frequently engaged in civil disobedience and was arrested and imprisoned many times for civil disobedience when he broke the law. Unlike his brother Philip, for whatever reasons, I do not know Daniel Berrigan very well, Daniel Berrigan never left the priesthood. This stands in contrast to numerous other Catholics who have over the years left the Catholic Church due to important disagreements with the Church hierarchy over doctrine and policy.
I supposed it is my natural tendency to look for positive explanations for a person’s behavior or beliefs that I find disturbing or disagree with, as well as the sense that a person should be considered at worst only a suspect and therefore still not proven guilty until proven guilty; that is the reason I continue to assume that Daniel Berrigan’s opposition to abortion has been based upon a religiously informed belief about what constitutes the beginning of human life and what that means, rather than links between abortion beliefs and patriarchy, or patriarchy and loyalty to the Catholic Church hierarchy during a massive priest sexual abuse of children scandal. I expect that I will continue relying on that assumption as a working hypothesis until information comes to light that contradicts it.
If this is in fact true, I am not surprised that Daniel Berrigan well might “[agree] with Cardinal Martino’s statement that individual Catholics and Catholic organizations should withdraw all support for Amnesty International if it doesn’t reverse its decision to advocate for abortion rights.”
By the way Quaker Meetings of the non-programmed variety have been moving more broadly toward acceptance both officially and in terms of the community itself of non-theism (aka atheism) over the past twenty years or so.
pjd412 wrote:
When are people going to start boycotting and picketing synagogues and University Hillel centers over what Israel is doing?
* * * * *
My Reply:
Unless I missed something, which is always possible, I am not aware of non-Catholics boycotting and picketing Catholic churches, because of the sexual abuse committed by Catholic priests.
However, in the Boston area some Catholics occupied one maybe two Catholic churches I cannot remember exactly which the diocese had decided to close because of a diocesan-wide drop in donations by Catholics to the Catholic Church as a result of their outrage not only over the sexual abuse committed by priests but also over the extended cover up of sexual abuse committed by priests over quite a number of years by the Catholic hierarchy.
readytotransform (aka rita) wrote:
I had thought that Jesus said,, that one should look at one's own house, before they throw stones. When one is a member of a 2,000 year old empire...........
That said. Yes. He has done good work. But can't go beyond the patriarchal mindset of the world's oldest empire.
- - - - -
readytotransform (aka rita) wrote:
Yes, everyone has something we can point to. Agreed. But as i said here, disdain of the 'feminine' is the root of the emperial war machine. You can throw blood on bombs and get arrested til doomsday, and it doesn't matter one whit if you force little girls to have babies with aids and be cast out of their families and become untouchables because your organization wants to control female bodies.
* * * * * *
rita,
I have no intention of insulting you about this matter nor I expect any other matter.
Best I can tell so far, you are not the sort of person who provokes insults from others by adhering intensely and mindlessly to dogma thoughout an extended discussion while continuously insulting others who are sincerely albeit quite futilely trying to communicate with you. If anything would provoke me to mildly insult someone else out of frustration that would be it.
What's more I do think that your characterization of the Caltholic Church as a 2000 year old empire is accurate and fair; and I agree that "disdain of the 'feminine' is [a] root of the emperial war machine."
Also, I would characterize the Chinese empire as the oldest still functioning empire on the planet, rather than the Vatican and the rest of the Catholic Church.
Recognizing these facts in no way detracts from the many worthy efforts of Dorothy Day and the Catholic Workers. or priests and nuns and Catholic laity who found inspiration in liberation theology, or the priests and nuns who stood between the army and the people against the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines when the people there rose up in massive protest, or other examples of Catholics working for peace and justice.
Years ago when I lived in Worcester, MA there was a Catholic Worker living there who was active in the peace movement and also the pro-life movement (anti-abortion / anti-choice) who was jailed for engaging in civil disobedience against war and nuclear weapons manufacturing as well as abortion.
I am pro-choice. For whatever the reasons and the actual underlying beliefs may be, this is a place where many people who have been active together in the peace movement part ways.
Re: Peace Activism, Democracy, Non-violence, and The Parable of The Tribes
I too would like to thank Daniel Berrigan for his lifetime of peace activism, notwithstanding his unqualified opposition to abortion.
The existence of genuine democracy provides people with the means of controlling and reducing as much as is possible the abuse of power in society.
During Daniel Berrigan's entire lifetime and in fact during the entire history of the United States genuine democracy has not existed anywhere in the United States at least not at the federal or state government levels.
During the best of times a well-functioning proto-democracy has existed in the United States providing a façade of democracy, which has granted the working class a very limited and controlled means of exercising political power within society, while at the same time serving the ruling elite as an effective means of propaganda.
Among many other things the replacement of Plurality Voting with a consent-dissent grading scale based voting procedure such as Yes No 'Maybe So' Voting (YNMS) or Category Scale Power Voting (CSPV) is needed to establish genuine democracy in the United States.
In order to control and reduce the abusive use of power and violence in society a relatively non-violent means of exercising power is needed. The kind of institution that supports relatively non-violent means of exercising power and controlling the abuse of power in society is genuine democracy.
For this reason as well as for a number of other related reasons, I believe that non-violence is the best means for achieving peace and justice.
While I do believe peaceful means have a distinct edge, an instructive "story" called "The Parable of the Tribes" posted as a Reply to this Comment indicates why both peaceful means and violent means have been so ineffective in establishing peace and justice over the millennia.
Re: Peace Activism, Democracy, Non-violence, and The Parable of The Tribes
- - - - -
The Parable of The Tribes
- -
Previously posted under the article "Delusion and Denial Part 1: Work, Jobs, Careerism, Charity" by Kristine Mattis , Common Dreams, May 1, 2011.
Article URL: www.commondreams.org/view/2011/05/01-1
- - - - -
[First excerpt] from "The Parable of the Tribes" by Andrew Bard Schmookler, In Constext: A Quarterly of Humane Sustainable Culture, Autumn 1984,
Article URL: www.context.org/ICLIB/IC07/Schmoklr.htm
- -
"The Parable
The new human freedom made striving for expansion and power possible. Such freedom, when multiplied, creates anarchy. The anarchy among civilized societies meant that the play of power in the system was uncontrollable. In an anarchic situation like that, no one can choose that the struggle for power shall cease. But there is one more element in the picture: no one is free to choose peace, but anyone can impose upon all the necessity for power. This is the lesson of the parable of the tribes.
Imagine a group of tribes living within reach of one another. If all choose the way of peace, then all may live in peace. But what if all but one choose peace, and that one is ambitious for expansion and conquest? What can happen to the others when confronted by an ambitious and potent neighbor? Perhaps one tribe is attacked and defeated, its people destroyed and its lands seized for the use of the victors. Another is defeated, but this one is not exterminated; rather, it is subjugated and transformed to serve the conqueror. A third seeking to avoid such disaster flees from the area into some inaccessible (and undesirable) place, and its former homeland becomes part of the growing empire of the power-seeking tribe. Let us suppose that others observing these developments decide to defend themselves in order to preserve themselves and their autonomy. But the irony is that successful defense against a power-maximizing aggressor requires a society to become more like the society that threatens it. Power can be stopped only by power, and if the threatening society has discovered ways to magnify its power through innovations in organization or technology (or whatever), the defensive society will have to transform itself into something more like its foe in order to resist the external force.
I have just outlined four possible outcomes for the threatened tribes: destruction, absorption and transformation, withdrawal, and imitation. In every one of these outcomes the ways of power are spread throughout the system. This is the parable of the tribes.
This parable is a theory of social evolution which shows that power is like a contaminant, a disease, which once introduced will gradually yet inexorably become universal in the system of competing societies. More important than the inevitability of the struggle for power is the profound social evolutionary consequence of that struggle once it begins. A selection for power among civilized societies is inevitable. If anarchy assured that power among civilized societies could not be governed, the selection for power signified that increasingly the ways of power would govern the destiny of mankind. This is the new evolutionary principle that came into the world with civilization. Here is the social evolutionary black hole that we have sought as an explanation of the harmful warp in the course of civilization's development."
- - - - -
[Second excerpt] from "The Parable of the Tribes" by Andrew Bard Schmookler, In Constext: A Quarterly of Humane Sustainable Culture, Autumn 1984,
Article URL: www.context.org/ICLIB/IC07/Schmoklr.htm
- -
"The following [actually the preceding excerpt form the] article is based on excerpts from the first part of a major new book (same title and author, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984, 400pp, $19.95) that argues that the history of civilization has been largely shaped by the way that, as a system, civilization has no mechanisms for restraining the raw struggle for power between societies. Schmookler brings a remarkable depth of both scholarship and insight to this issue, tracing (in the latter parts of the book) the myriad insidious ways that this struggle has thwarted human choice. He makes it clear that the problems we face now, as we try to come to grips with our planetary interconnectedness, can't simply be blamed on personalities or ideologies, but are rooted in the fundamental structure of 5000 years of international anarchy. The problem of power that he raises and explores is a fundamental challenge for governance (at many levels) that we must deal with somehow if we are to have any hope of creating a humane sustainable culture as a successor to the darkness we call civilization. If you want to deepen your understanding of the full challenge we face, you'll find the book a mind-stretcher and a sobering treat. Reprinted with permission."
I feel honored to share the same birthday as Father Berrigan. Since I had no knowledge of his position regarding Amnesty International until I read the posts above (thanks for the heads up on that), I do not feel qualified to comment on that. But I nevertheless salute him for his commitment to peace and social justice.
In the RCC, we are constantly coming up with solutions concerning the sexual predators among the clergy. And we are completely hung up on the sexual part of it. Augustine has brain-washed us well and we immediately believe that all bad things must have their root in sex. But we miss that rape is a crime that misuses power. Our present hierarchical system that elevates one caste of people over another is twisted. The day that true humility is restored in the clergy is the day we will begin to heal. It needs to be a humility that embraces nothing is greater or lesser than another. God created us all out of the same cosmic building blocks. We will know this is happening when artificial titles disappear (Father, Your Eminence, Your Holiness, etc); when spiritual maturity is nurtured (promotion of the primacy of conscience and elimination of infantilizing doctrine) and when artificial barriers disappear (elevated altars, excommunication, sacramental apartheid, etc). It will then be harder to dismiss a child or woman who has been violated.