EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- Obama Cans Regulator Who Crossed Wall Street
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
Popular content
Today's Top News
Green Brazil
"This is now the great mystery of Brazilian politics: what will Marina do?" "Marina" is Marina Silva, leader of Brazil's Green Party, and the speaker, Altino Machado, is a journalist and one of her oldest friends. But Marina has already done something remarkable: she persuaded one-fifth of Brazil's voters to support the Green Party.
Twenty percent is the second-highest share of the vote ever won by any Green Party anywhere. (The record-holder is Antanas Mockus, the Green candidate in the recent election in Colombia, who got 27 percent of the vote.) But Brazil, with more than 200 million people, is the country that really counts in South America, and what has happened there is, in the words of the Rio de Janeiro paper O Dia, a "green tsunami."
Among other things, this remarkable result makes Marina Silva the king-maker in the second round of the Brazilian election. It was the votes that went to her that deprived Workers' Party candidate Dilma Roussef of victory in the first round of voting on 4 October. To win in the first round, a candidate must get 50 percent of the vote; "Dilma" ended up with 46.9 percent.
So now Marina (they are both known by their first names) must decide whether to tell her supporters to vote for Dilma in the second round of the election on 31 October, or to give their votes to the relatively conservative runner-up in the first round, Jose Serra. Greens are generally assumed to be on the left, but it is not a foregone conclusion that Marina will back the Workers' Party candidate.
Marina Silva has the classic biography of a Brazilian left-wing hero - born in the Amazonian state of Acre, the daughter of rubber-pickers, illiterate until she was sixteen - but she is also an evangelical Christian. As such, she is fiercely opposed to abortion, and a substantial portion of her vote came from Christians who were horrified by Dilma's advocacy of reform in Brazil's stern anti-abortion laws.
As a social conservative, Marina might even try to throw her votes to Serra. She is wringing every drop of drama out of the situation, and won't announce her choice until a special party convention late next week.
However, her decision matters less than it seems: Dilma only needs a few million extra votes to cross the 50-percent barrier, and Marina cannot really compel all the Greens to vote for Serra. The headline story is still the rapid economic growth Brazil has enjoyed under outgoing president Luiz Inacio "Lula" da Silva - and, just as importantly, the way the new wealth has been shared out.
Fifty million Brazilians have been rescued from poverty (an income of less than $82 per month) by Lula's "family plan" of subsidies for the very poor, and 25 million other low-income Brazilians have actually ascended into the middle class. So Lula leaves office after eight years with a stratospheric approval rating of 80 percent.
He is so popular that he could choose a complete nobody as his successor and get him or her elected. Dilma Roussef is much more than that - a former guerilla during the military dictatorship of 1964-85, a skilled administrator, and Lula's former chief of staff - but nobody has ever accused her of having too much charisma.
No matter. She'll win the second round anyway. What's really interesting here is the emergence, two decades after the restoration of democracy, of what you might call Brazil's political personality.
All three big political parties, the Workers' Party, Serra's Social Democrats, and the Greens, are on the left in terms of economic policy, though Marxist ranters are scarce in all of them. Social conservatives are still well represented in the latter two parties, but they all promise to continue Lula's wonder-working brand of pragmatic socialism. Together, they got 98 percent of the vote in the elections on 4 October.
The rapid rise of the Greens is linked to Brazilians' growing awareness that they are the custodians of the world's largest tropical forest, the Amazon, and that it is in serious danger from global warming. That may explain why 85 percent of Brazilians think that climate change is a major problem, while only 37 percent of Americans do.
It's a striking picture. Brazil is the only one of the BRICs, the big countries with high economic growth rates, to have both a powerful industrial sector (like India and China) and self-sufficiency in energy (like Russia). By the time it hosts the Olympic Games in 2016, it will probably have the fifth-largest economy in the world.
It is still one of the world's most unequal countries, with a gulf between rich and poor that makes even the United States look egalitarian. (20,000 families control 46 percent of Brazil's wealth, and one percent of land-owners own 44 percent of all the land.) But it is moving in a different direction now, without any of the doctrinaire excesses that usually mar such efforts.
In fact, Brazil is becoming not just an important place, but a very interesting place.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...




26 Comments so far
Show AllWhen the US gets to the point that one % owns 44% of our land, perhaps then we too will become a 'leftist' nation.
Gregy, baby:
1) The US government owns most of the land in the USA.
2) The corporate CEOs (less - MUCH LESS - than one tenth of one percent of the US population) OWN the US government.
The rest is disneyland PR.
The false left-right thing strikes again, eh?
Dilma Roussef HATES Kissinger because of his involvement in operation Condor had a lot to do with her torture. For that alone, I think she's great!
Why do you eschew any government that gives common people a voice? I know. It's what psyops warriors do to earn their blood money.
You must be new around here, otherwise you wouldn't so brazenly troll with your anti-Venezuela tripe.
One version of "green" for Brazil is tearing down the rain forest so that they can grow sugar cane for ethanol production. That's a problem.
I agree that is wrong and stupid. Brazil needs to get over that "energy products at all costs' meme.
I'd like to see the Obama administration get them some more sweet loans so that Soros can increase his wealth and also so that Petrobras can use some of that money to hire the rigs leaving the gulf coast to drill in deeper Brazilian waters. Maybe Obama can also give the Brazilians a few of our aircraft carriers while he's at it. Perhaps also he'll endenture us into servitude we independents who have abandonded him.
Brazil gets it. They aren't falling for IMF scams. And they've got China as a customer so the US can't put an effective squeeze on them any more (not that we aren't trying - mafia dons never learn and they never stop).
"She is wringing every drop of drama out of the situation, and won't announce her choice until a special party convention late next week."
Arrrgh!
What a typical example of the classical USAn cult of the individual - and their cluelessness as to how real representative democracy works in the rest of the world.
I guess it didn't occur to Ms. Dyer that it might be the vote or consensus of the delegates at the special party convention who will decide who the Greens will endorse in the runoff. Marina probably doesn't have a choice in the matter at all.
And the "right" candidate, Social Democrat Serra is still far to the left of any possible candidate or party in the US.
And many Brazilians regard the the Workers Party, just like the "New Labor of the UK, as compromised by neoliberal interests, so they are not necessarily the most "left" party in the election.
Exactly right. And the Green party in Brazil isn't all that environmentally friendly either. They've got corruption out the wazoo down there but they don't hold a candle to the USA in corruption, oligarchy and war profiteering. Let's hope they don't use us as a model.
For vacations l used to go to third world counties, now l stay home and wait for us to become one.
Earl Simmins....you are so Funny !!!! that was a great one!
did you all notice also:
the article mentions that ALL the 3 parties...even that the green party is headed by a religious "conservative" christian...
compared to the USA are "all LEFT leaning?"
roflmao.
The church in Brazil is very leftist and has a history of having opposed the military dictatorship from 1964 to 1985. Religion in Brazil has nothing to do with the way religion's used in the US. Brazilians use the teachings of Christianity to the letter, so yes, compared with the US the 3 parties are left-leaning. What do you think the tale of Jesus multiplying bread and fish in the Gospel mean? Division of wealth: socialism and communism. If Jesus returned to Earth and retold the tale the US would send him to Guantanamo.
Brazilians take Jesus Christ seriously, unlike Americans, who use Jesus to justify their hatred, bigotry, greed, homophobia and eye-for-an-eye mentality.
delia_darrow:
That's right, and it amazes me that people on the so-called left here don't know about Liberation Theology in Latin America that was totally Latin American genuine "Jesus the Socialist" movement that became tremendously popular among the masses during the reign of terror of American supported military dictators and oligarchic thugs. Mexico is still partly like that. Colombia, the narco state and US darling, is still in that 60s and 70's mode of thug rule.
In fact, Liberation Theology became so popular and attracted so many genuine intellectual Catholic scholars not only in Latin America, but also in Europe and to some extent in Canada, especially in Quebec, that the previous Pope from Poland and the conservative cardinals of Latin America wiped out that theology under threat of ex-communication. The oligarchs and aristocrats in Europe from the Royal Families and big industrialists, and large land owners and military warlords in Latin America warned the Pope that Liberation Theology was on the verge of splitting LA from mainstream, pro-capitalist/fascist catholicism of Europe and America and Africa, to a Marxist friendly new theolgy not centred on Christ's death and resurrection but on his ideals. That would have reduced Catholicism from 1 billion world-wide to 500 million and also with a big dent in Papal revenue from tithes. Hence the Polish Pope, supporting Lech Walensa but not liberation for the masses in Latin America showed his euro-centric views of Christianity.
Many of the Liberation theology priests defrocked, became left wing social, education and union and other leaders. They changed the face of Latin America by first getting rid of the IMF and World Bank peonage under Amurka. The rest is history in the late 20th century and early 21st. The co-operative agreements Lula signed with Venezuela, Argentina and Chile make these four the leaders a powerful socio-economic LA block that want no gringo domination over the internal or external relations LA. The Monroe doctrine is dead. That Cuba has been given a warm welcome and great deal of respect by LA in the last 10 years, especially in Brazil under Lula and Chavez in Venezuela, LA may yet surprise the world as a progressive, well manged green and relatively prosperous land mass of continental size and population and at least 10-15% of the world's economy. Brazil could have great influence in Africa in Mozambique on the East Coast and Angola on the West coast of Africa. Both are ex-Portuguese colonies, and have both forest and natural resources. Angola has the second or third largest oil reserves after Nigeria in Black Africa. Brazil is Portuguese speaking, but it has a huge mix of Europeans from Catholic countries in Europe.
Lula has moved deftly given the fact that the military still has residual generals who were captains, majors and colonels at the time of the old generals with similar ideas. A Middle Class/working class military may be best security for civlian, progressive democracy in Brazil.
I read an article in the National Geographic that the Amazon Basin is the best managed tropical forest preserve in the world. Here deforestation is much lower than in the Congo Basin and in Indonesia(Borneo). In fact, all the most reliable statistical data about tropical forests, including deforestation rates and effects threoff, and regrowth, all comes from Brazil's huge data base on the Amazon. It is then extrapolated to the Congo Basin and to Borneo/Java/Sumatra in Indonesia.
reasonisreligion...that's a very important insight.
it has often made me wonder what any leader potential in south america might really be up to that has ANY influence coming from the AMERICAN evangelical movement that seems to have largely been quite "conservative" in its politics and economics in the USA...and ends up being the "base" of guys LIKE george bush...tea party...karl rove..."war on terror OF ISLAM" folks...it always has seemed to me that the american forays through the so-called "evangelical movement" is a kind of TROJAN HORSE..espousing "jesus is my personal Lord and Saviour" talk but also wrapping that cross with the American ideology of neo-liberal economics...and its natural "rival" that has to be "cleansed" would then be south america's "leftist" Liberation theology -- which of course is basically a catholic one.
on the other hand-- there is - so-called - a movement in the USA that calls itself "EMERGENT EVANGELICALS" - that they say ALSO subscribes to "liberation theology" and believes that the more dominant traditional american evangelical movement with its adherence to "free market" capitalism is misguided and not true followers of Christ.
Thanks, Delia_Darrow, for the insight.
I was also wondering what the added significance might be of the Green party's candidate being reportedly a "born -again" type christian, at least by my impression...that seems to me to be reflective of AMERICAN "born-again" type or evangelical PROTESTANT denomination travelers to Brazil over the past decade?. i mean..it's known that for many years now, american evangelical groups and churches have been foraying into other countries to "spread the word" as they say..perhaps clashing with the local denominations or traditional religious cultures..but also presumably bringing with them a particularly "american" brand of christianity.
IF SO -- what is the connection between this Marina and them? she herself could be a kind of "sleeper" american "convert"..who will try to gradually "transform" brazil, using her religious platform in the assumption that she has a "base" in the green party while transforming its "green platform" into an AMERICAN influenced "free market" launch pad. we might have indications , whatever her final status will be , in phrases reflecting american ideology:
"self-responsibility...christ the Lord...our personal savior..."..etc...
teddy Marina's a Pentecostal Christian in the Assemblies of God, which is only behind Catholicism in Brazil. She's not an American "born-again" type or evangelical protestant and has no connections with any US religious movement or the comical rapturists, but she might as well be one of them.
She's against gay marriage and abortion, which should be enough for any leftist to dismiss her, my post above wasn't an endorsement. Her running mate's the president of Natura, a multi-million dollar cosmetics conglomerate in Brazil. Its current direct and indirect GHG emissions measure 270,000 tons of carbon monoxide per year. You tell me if that sounds green to you. Marina's Green Party has also highly suspicious characters as members, including Zequinha Sarney, the son of former president José Sarney, hand-picked by the military to be Tancredo Neves' running mate in 1984.
The only good thing about Marina's her pro-environmental rhetoric, which is just that, rhetoric.
Thanks for the added info. Delia_Darrow.
I understood that you were just adding information.
I was curious as to what she's about...because I've been aware over the years of americans visiting Brazil that cleary didn't "like that Lula"..and were themselves evengelicals, and more often than not the characteristic "conservatives" of america...which we also know tend to be for the policies that are quite "capitalist" as we all keep discussing.
so i wonder if her "green-ness" is akin to US corporate polluters slapping "green" on themselves ...if you know what I mean...but that in HER case...she uses her declarations of being a "woman of god" to garner support from people who are conducive to "green" policies and ALSO religiously similar to herself...only to work as a trojan horse to undermine the general "left" leaning of brazil as a whole.
in other words: an american-style corporatist in "green clothing" akin to a wolf in sheep's clothing. And, if that were so, she'd be "green" alright...as in GREEN DOLLARS ...
trying to get to power in order to bring in "green AIG, Green Goldman Sachs, Green Washington Consensus, Green Privatization of Brazil's unbelievable natural resources, GREEN IN EVERYTHING BUT the environment"...ONCE she is in power or has some "say" in it.
the latin american catholic church has been under the influence of the Liberation Theology, which is informed by the French Structuralist philosophy, which is the philosophical twin of the marxist history.
john paul (Rome) excommunicated the liberation theologists, naturally, and the current guy could care less about justice as we all know so well.
of course, that doesn't guarantee that the catholic population in latin america understand and vote for a coherently progressive politics.
Democracy Now! did a story on this that's good.
www.democracynow.org/2010/10/4/picking_lulas_replacement_brazil_heads_to
for Ms. Dyer, a Green activist, Marxists are simply ranters, eh?
like i said, Green is no political color.
lift their cloak of Green and find out their true political color, before casting your vote.
The time will come when people will compare the democratic nations in South and Central America to what the USA once was.