EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Battle at Coal River Mountain Explodes: Green Jobs Vs. Big Coal Showdown
The Battle at Coal River Mountain has officially begun.
At the same time President Barack Obama invoked the "legacy of daring men and women" in our nation's quest for renewable energy initiatives, and as millions of concerned citizens rallied in support of 350.org climate change events around the world this past weekend, Big Coal bulldozers reportedly clear cut a swath of lush deciduous forests in the carbon sink of Appalachia and fired the opening salvos in the mountaintop removal mining blasting process to destroy the historic range slated for the Coal River Mountain Wind Project -- the most symbolic clean energy project in the nation.
But not without a fight.
Just as Appalachian mountaineers single-handedly turned the tide of the American Revolution, in the words of Thomas Jefferson, in defeating the British loyalists who threatened to lay waste to mountain communities at the Battle of Kings Mountain in 1780; just as mountaineers and union coal miners marched to liberate mountain communities at the Battle of Blair Mountain in 1921 against Big Coal and their armed thugs, an extremely organized and growing coalfield uprising movement against mountaintop removal has marked a line in the sand on Coal River Mountain as the ultimate battleground to stop mountaintop removal and launch President Obama's clean energy jobs program.
How can you join the battle at Coal River Mountain?
First, donate generously to the non-profit Coal River Mountain Watch advocates on the frontlines; support the coalfield organizations in the Alliance for Appalachia; put your body on the line with direct action organizations like Climate Ground Zero, Mountain Justice and Rainforest Action Network; contact national environmental organizations like the Sierra Club Beyond Coal Campaign and Natural Resources Defense Council.
RAN, in fact, has called for a national "End Mountaintop Removal Day of Action" for next Friday, October 30.
And take action at the I Love Mountains website.
Coalfield residents and the national allies are calling on all concerned citizens to contact President Obama, CEQ chief Nancy Sutley, EPA chief Lisa Jackson, and Sen. Robert Byrd to halt this unfolding tragedy.
In a blatant act of aggression against besieged coalfield residents, blasting dangerously close to one of the largest coal slurry impoundments in the nation, and immediately eliminating 24 megawatts of wind power development for the internationally acclaimed Coal River Wind Project, a subsidiary of Big Coal behemoth Massey Energy recently lay waste to the first acres of the 1,100-acre Bee Tree Branch section of a proposed 6,000-acre mountaintop removal operation designed to destroy the last in tact mountain on the historic Coal River Mountain range.
Here are the first exclusive photos of the destruction:

This blasting in the Bee Tree Branch area of Coal River Mountain effectively derails the Coal River Wind Project. Unlike the limited 14-year supply of coal on the site, the Coal River Wind project could provide long-term energy for 70,000 households, an estimated 200 jobs and $1.7 million in annual county taxes. In spite of the blasting, the upcoming UN conference on climate change in Copenhagen will also be reviewing the Coal River Wind proposal as a model for sustainable green economic development in the United States.
Last week, area residents also appealed to Gov. Manchin to halt the blasting and order a state of emergency, in order to thoroughly investigate the catastrophic potential of the jeopardized Brushy Fork coal slurry impoundment, which holds back billions of gallons of toxic coal sludge. Blasting is taking place within a dangerously close distance of honey-combed underground mines by the impoundment dam.
Residents noted that another Massey subsidiary in eastern Kentucky was responsible for the largest coal slurry spill in 2000, where 300 million gallons of toxic sludge into the area's waterways and aquifers. If the earthen Brushy Fork dam breaks, nearly 1,000 area residents will have less than five minutes to save their lives.
In effect, Coal River Mountain should be ground zero in the climate change and renewable energy movements.
And the blasting of Bee Tree Branch will not only strip the great range of its resources, its tributaries and lush forests, its history and its meaning; it will rob Americans of the possibility of creating long-lasting green jobs and energy. It will resound as the death knell of an American and Appalachian way of life, and a rejection of any opportunities for a sustainable future for the embattled coalfields.
The blasting has been launched.
Will the nation -- and the Obama administration -- defend Coal River Mountain from this reckless assault on American citizens, our American mountains and waterways, and a clean energy future?
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


27 Comments so far
Show AllNot even Democrat Creigh Deeds is listening. If he hadn't supported MTR on his siding with Obama, he wouldn't be polling so badly by now. After Obama fired van Jones, the Green Jobs project went in limbo. Obama's own home state, IL, is the biggest coal producing state and since Obama has always sided with Big Coal, I had no reason to believe that he would keep his promise of stopping MTR. The piling coal mining tragedies in WV of the past decade will be nothing once MTR goes into effect and it won't be just the miners who will be severely impacted.
Actually, Wyoming is by far the biggest coal producer. The strip mines of the huge 50 foot thick seams in the Powder River Basin produce almost as much coal as all the eastern US coal fields combined.
Illinois sits behind West Virginia, Kentucky and Pennsylvania in coal production. It probably does have the largest-producing underground mines in the US right now, and those mines exhibit political influence far disproportoinate to their contribution to the state econmmy. And the subsidence from their longwall operations is damaging and degrading - possibly permanently, thousands of acres of the best farmland on earth.
The eastern coal fields are mostly post-peak. In spite of more efficient equipment, more miners and the use of destructive surface mining methods, West Virginia coal production has been slowly declining since the late 1990's
Thanks pjd for the correction. I didn't know that Peak Coal has already started. If you have been to the western part of VA, you'd notice the similarities between people there and in WV. At one point on my visit to Shenandoah, I came across a couple of people who wanted the coal madness to end. Both of them plan to vote Republican because they were upset that deeds stands with Obama on MTR. Mcdonnell does too but the outrage against MTR is there.
"And the blasting of Bee Tree Branch will not only strip the great range of its resources, its tributaries and lush forests, its history and its meaning; it will rob Americans of the possibility of creating long-lasting green jobs and energy. It will resound as the death knell of an American and Appalachian way of life, and a rejection of any opportunities for a sustainable future for the embattled coalfields."
Isn't it pretty obvious that the fossil fuel industry wants to eliminate the possibility of a future competitive source of energy?
q
Unfortunately, my reaction to this on FaceBook would be flagged here. I'll just go with, grrrrr.
There are a few 'mountain tops' I'd like to 'remove', namely the enlarged heads (that look like mountains to me) on these egotistical madmen they call CEO's and such. Not to mention the politicians that follow suit with 'benjamins' hanging out of the pockets.
It is surprising, to say the least, that this article on MTR, with its appeal to people to join Obama's "clean energy" agenda, and protest the latest MTR episode, makes not a whisper of mention of how that "agenda" is playing out. Specifically, he fails to note, what has been covered in the current issue of Mother Jones,
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2009/10/coal-activists-senators-question-obama-pick-head-surface-mining-office
that "clean energy" Obama has attempted to put in office as head of the Bureau of Surface Mining (including moutaintops) one Joseph Pitarcik from Pennylvania, a "regulator" of mining in PA who quite regularly "regulates" in favor of the coal mining industry. As environmental agencies have reacted with outrage at the impending nomination, only the action of a "mystery Senator" in putting a "hold" on the nomination has stopped the henyard of mountain removal having been already been put in the charge of an industry fox. Rather than, or in addition to, those protests suggested by Biggers, I would think it equally important to protest the Pitarchik nomination, since the holder of that office will have signficant impact on the progress of the destruction of our mountain treasures.
"Rather than, or in addition to, those protests suggested by Biggers, I would think it equally important to protest the Pitarchik nomination, since the holder of that office will have signficant impact on the progress of the destruction of our mountain treasures."
Good idea. Do you know if any groups are already doing that?
zmann: from the Mother Jones article:
The Mountain Watershed Association, Friends of the Earth, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, the Alliance for Appalachia, Environmental Integrity Project and Appalachian Voices are all stoking opposition to the nomination.
Cool, looks like two groups that have a presence in DC are in there. I'll bring it up with Rainforest Action Network next time I talk to the DC organizer, it's trying to get the EPA to ban mountaintop removal mining. Preventing this schmuck from taking that post would surely help.
zmann: That's good, and I have a contact or so with Appalachian Voices whose MTR removal visit to our town I sponsored a couple of years ago.
good point, though you might want to note that Jeff Biggers has been an extremely outspoken critic of the Pizarchik nomination. I found a few posts...
Let Them Eat Coal Ash: Pizarchik Must be Stopped
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/08/06-10
Irreparable Damage: Block Pizarchik
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-biggers/irreparable-damage-senate_b_313450.html
It is a sad fact that coal miners in Appalachia, are between a rock and a hard place. In order to support their families, they must work at a job that destroys their environment. No one should be put in this position. That being said, its also true that most of these same miners, and their families, are vulnerable to the fear-mongering of Republicans and usually vote for them. I was raised in W.Va., my uncle was a coal-miner for over fifty years, and so I understand their point of view. If such conditioning is to be overcome, there must be first, a huge effort to acquaint them with the facts, perhaps searching out their most respected leaders, to see if they might be recruited to assist the effort, and second, a tandem effort to train them for new jobs that are environmentally healthier. King coal uses poverty and ignorance to destroy the sacred mountains of Appalachia, in order to stuff their pockets with more money, while politicians in Washington are paid to look the other way. Only the people can stop this, but will they?
At one time, coal miners lived within walking distance of the portal. Now, I've noticed (I work for MSHA) they usually don't even live in the same county or even 2 counties from, the mine. They all seem to commute long distances for their shift. And the there is almost a perfect coorelation between coal production and poverty - the more coal produced, the more poverty - approaching 40% of households in some eastern Kentucky counties.
So, for the large majority of people who actually live near the mines - surface or underground, there is not only no economic benefit - but the benefit is negative!
The nearby counties without coal at all - in the ridge-and-valleys to the east and south, are visibly much better off.
Just as a note of interest.
Many workers in the Athabasca Tarsands do not live there. Literally THOUSANDS of them commute from as far as 10 hours drive away. They live in the workcamps and or hotels/motels booked full in the town , work a 3 week shift and then head back home.
Sen Byrd is a Republican?
Companies like Massey Energy should be declared TERRORIST organizations, their "leaders" should be hunted down and rounded up and sent to Guantanamo and their HQ should be bombed by drones.
Think about it! Someone who strikes a nail into a tree to hamper logging is on an FBI "environmental terrorist" list while the REAL terrorists are paying off the politicians and raking in the dough while pulverizing Appalachia, a place that Biggers correctly calls a "carbon sink."
We really do need a New American Jihad. This country has been going after the wrong targets. They are in our midst, terrorizing in broad daylight.
-30-
Uranium mining in the Grand Canyon?
http://www.environmentcolorado.org/action/preservation/grandcanyon-email?id4=ES
I think that this other, additional war on the population of the USA for "corporate America" is going to need plenty more than only one day of direct action. One day? Heck, the corporation behind this destruction and insane exploitation of the environment can just tell workers to stay home and return the next day.
And who the heck are the people doing this destruction jobs anyway; are they Americans or foreigners? If they're Americans, then shame the bastards good. If they're foreigners, then put them on planes and send them back where they came from, while adding that they should never show their faces ever again in the USA.
A lot of foreigners in their own countries surely feel the same way about Americans, and are right to feel or think this way.
"Corporate America" is enemy to us all.
have faith in Obama and stop listening to Fox News. Any dissent against Obama is either lies or racism. Obama will do the right thing, he said he would.
?!
the brave souls in that union battle on Blair Mtn were called "rednecks" keep that in mind when you use that union word as a slur. The union fighters wore red scarves or bandanas around their necks.
How about a little ground truth from a West Virginian?
First, pjdf4, WV has many LESS miners than 40 years ago--once 100,000 people mined coal here, now it's 15,000 of which 6000 do the surface-mining-on-steroids known as Mountaintop removal. Second, even if these guys do a fair amount of commuting, they identify themselves as West Virginians and their opponents as out-of-state treehuggers. These guys are making something like $70,000 a year with a high school education in a poor state. You better believe they'll fight to keep these jobs. The alternative is a job flipping burgers or working at Wal-Mart at barely over minimum wage. They are not interested in green jobs unless the jobs are at hand and pay the same--unlikely. Upton Sinclair once said, "It's difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." These men manage to persuade themselves that they are improving the mountains, that climate change is a hoax. Polls show a slight majority of state residents oppose MTR, but in the coalfields people keep their heads down and their mouths shut. All state politicians passionately and constantly support the coal industry, but of late there is beginning to be some change in attitudes in Washington, and so the industry and its workers feel beseiged. The workers are told that any change in the laws will throw them out of work. This battle has been going on a long time but only now are they getting aggressive.
Used to be, mainly environmentalists showed up at public hearings about coal mines or power plants, and no matter how passionately and intelligently and variously they argued the points, the permits were always granted. ALWAYS. But at the recent hearing about the Army Corps of Engineers' proposed change in not using rubber stamp permits on MTR operations, a thousand angry miners showed up (no doubt bussed to the event by their bosses and wound up to a pitch of aggrieved outrage on the way). They turned the "public hearing" into a rally, drowning out the few pro-mountain speakers and threatening those still outside; the police made several of these leave "for their own safety" without even trying to speak. A woman was knocked down--another 80 year old lady was backed up to a wall by a 300 pound thug screaming in her face.
No, we're not all out of state treehuggers--but we sure could use some more of those, for exactly the same reasons outsiders were needed to ratify civil rights legislation on the ground in the South.
did their union pay for the bussing in? Why do you hate on the coal miner's union?
what is a "green job" anyway? Working for Greenpeace? That word is used a lot. here in Michigan especially. There are some "green" jobs I guess but they take advance degrees or at least a Bachelor's Degree. Nothing for the laid off UAW workers or the average Detroiter.