Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Man in the Mirror
In celebrity culture we destroy what we worship. The commercial exploitation of Michael Jackson’s death was orchestrated by the corporate forces that rendered Jackson insane. Jackson, robbed of his childhood and surrounded by vultures that preyed on his fears and weaknesses, was so consumed by self-loathing he carved his African-American face into an ever changing Caucasian death mask and hid his apparent pedophilia behind a Peter Pan illusion of eternal childhood. He could not disentangle his public and his private self. He became a commodity, a product, one to be sold, used and manipulated. He was infected by the moral nihilism and personal disintegration that are at the core of our corporate culture. And his fantasies of eternal youth, delusions of majesty, and desperate, disfiguring quests for physical transformation were expressions of our own yearning. He was a reflection of us in the extreme.
His memorial service—a variety show with a coffin—had an estimated 31.1 million television viewers. The ceremony, which featured performances or tributes from Stevie Wonder, Brooke Shields and other celebrities, was carried live on 19 networks, including the major broadcast and cable news outlets. It was the final episode of the long-running Michael Jackson series. And it concluded with Jackson’s daughter, Paris, being prodded to stand in front of a microphone to speak about her father. Janet Jackson, before the girl could get a few words out, told Paris to “speak up.” As the child broke down, the adults around her adjusted the microphone so we could hear the sobs. The crowd clapped. It was a haunting echo of what destroyed her father.
The stories we like best are “real life” stories—early fame, wild success and then a long, bizarre and macabre emotional train wreck. O.J Simpson offered a tamer version of the same plot. So does Britney Spears. Jackson, by the end, was heavily in debt and had weathered a $22 million out-of-court settlement payment to Jordy Chandler, as well as seven counts of child sexual abuse and two counts of administering an intoxicating agent in order to commit a felony. We fed on his physical and psychological disintegration, especially since many Americans are struggling with their own descent into overwhelming debt, loss of status and personal disintegration.
The lurid drama of Jackson’s personal life meshed perfectly with the ongoing dramas on television, in movies and in the news. News thrives on “real life” stories, especially those involving celebrities. News reports on television are mini-dramas complete with a star, a villain, a supporting cast, a good-looking host and a dramatic, if often unexpected, ending. The public greedily consumed “news” about Jackson, especially in his exile and decline, which often outdid most works of fiction. In “Fahrenheit 451,” Ray Bradbury’s novel about a future dystopia, people spend most of the day watching giant television screens that show endless scenes of police chases and criminal apprehensions. Life, Bradbury understood, once it was packaged, scripted, given a narrative and filmed, became the most compelling form of entertainment. And Jackson was a great show. He deserved a great finale.
Those who created Jackson’s public persona and turned him into a piece of property, first as a child and finally as a corpse encased in a $15,000 gold-plated casket, are the agents, publicists, marketing people, promoters, script writers, television and movie producers, advertisers, video technicians, photographers, bodyguards, recording executives, wardrobe consultants, fitness trainers, pollsters, public announcers and television news personalities who create the vast stage of celebrity for profit. They are the puppet masters. No one achieves celebrity status, no cultural illusion is swallowed as reality, without these armies of cultural enablers and intermediaries. The producers at the Staples Center in Los Angeles made sure the 18,000 attendees and the television audience (even the BBC devoted three hours to the tribute) watched a funeral that was turned into another maudlin form of uplifting popular entertainment.
The memorial service for Jackson was a celebration of celebrity. There was the queasy sight of groups of children, including his own, singing over the coffin. Magic Johnson put in a plug for Kentucky Fried Chicken. Shields, fighting back tears, recalled how she and a 33-year-old Jackson—who always maintained that he was straight—broke into Elizabeth Taylor’s room the night before her last wedding to “get the first peek of the [wedding] dress.” Shields and Jackson, at Taylor’s wedding, then joked that they were “the mother and father of the bride.” “Yes, it may have seemed very odd to the outside,” Shields said, “but we made it fun and we made it real.” There were photo montages in which a shot of Jackson shaking hands with Nelson Mandela was immediately followed by one of him with Kermit the Frog. Fame reduces all of the famous to the same level. Fame is its own denominator. And every anecdote seemed to confirm that when you spend your life as a celebrity you have no idea who you are.
We measure our lives by these celebrities. We seek to be like them. We emulate their look and behavior. We escape the messiness of real life through the fantasy of their stardom. We, too, long to attract admiring audiences for our grand, ongoing life movie. We try to see ourselves moving through our lives as a camera would see us, mindful of how we hold ourselves, how we dress, what we say. We invent movies that play inside our heads with us as stars. We wonder how an audience would react. Celebrity culture has taught us, almost unconsciously, to generate interior personal screenplays. We have learned ways of speaking and thinking that grossly disfigure the way we relate to the world and those around us. Neal Gabler, who has written wisely about this, argues that celebrity culture is not a convergence of consumer culture and religion so much as a hostile takeover of religion by consumer culture.
Jackson desperately feared growing old. He believed he could control race and gender. He transformed himself through surgery and perhaps female hormones from a brown-skinned African-American male to a chalk-faced androgynous ghoul with no clear sexual identity. And while he pushed these boundaries to the extreme, he did only what many Americans do. There were 12 million cosmetic plastic surgery procedures performed last year in the United States. They were performed because, in America, most human beings, rich and poor, famous and obscure, have been conditioned to view themselves as marketable commodities. They are objects, like consumer products. They have no intrinsic value. They must look fabulous and live on fabulous sets. They must remain young. They must achieve notoriety and money, or the illusion of it, to be a success. And it does not matter how they get there.
The moral nihilism of our culture licenses a dark voyeurism into other people’s humiliation, pain, weakness and betrayal. Education, building community, honesty, transparency and sharing are qualities that will see you, in a gross perversion of democracy and morality, ridiculed and voted off any reality show. Fellow competitors for prize money and a chance for fleeting fame elect to “disappear” the unwanted. In the final credits of the reality show “America’s Next Top Model,” a picture of the woman expelled during the episode vanishes from the group portrait on the screen. Those cast aside become, at least to the television audience, nonpersons. Celebrities who can no longer generate publicity, good or bad, vanish. Life, these shows teach, is a brutal world of unadulterated competition and constant quest for notoriety and attention. And life is about the personal humiliation of those who oppose us. Those who win are the best. Those who lose deserve to be erased. Those who fail, those who are ugly or poor, are belittled and mocked. Human beings are used, betrayed and discarded in a commodity culture, which is pretty much the story of Jackson’s life, although he experienced the equivalent of celebrity resurrection. This has been very good for his music sales and perhaps for his father’s new recording company, which Joe Jackson made sure to plug at public events after his son’s death. Compassion, competence, intelligence and solidarity are useless assets when human beings are commodities. Those who do not achieve celebrity status, who do not win the prize money or make millions in Wall Street firms, deserve their fate.
The cult of self, which Jackson embodied, dominates our culture. This cult shares within it the classic traits of psychopaths: superficial charm, grandiosity and self-importance; a need for constant stimulation, a penchant for lying, deception and manipulation; and the incapacity for remorse or guilt. Jackson, from his phony marriages to his questionable relationships with young boys, had all these qualities. This is also the ethic promoted by corporations. It is the ethic of unfettered capitalism. It is the misguided belief that personal style and personal advancement, mistaken for individualism, are the same as democratic equality. It is the celebration of image over substance.
We have a right, in the cult of the self, to get whatever we desire. We can do anything, even belittle and destroy those around us, including our friends, to make money, to be happy and to become famous. Once fame and wealth are achieved, they become their own justification, their own morality. How one gets there is irrelevant. It is this perverted ethic that gave us Wall Street banks and investment houses that willfully trashed the nation’s economy, stole money from tens of millions of small shareholders who had bought stocks to finance their retirement or the college expenses of their children. The heads of these corporations, like the winners on a reality television program who lied and manipulated others to succeed, walked away with hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation and bonuses. The ethic of Wall Street is the ethic of celebrity.
The saturation coverage of Jackson’s death is an example of our collective flight into illusion. The obsession with the trivia of his life conceals the despair, meaninglessness and emptiness of our own lives. It deflects the moral questions arising from mounting social injustice, growing inequalities, costly imperial wars, economic collapse and political corruption. The wild pursuit of status, wealth and fame has destroyed our souls, as it destroyed Jackson, and it has destroyed our economy.
The fame of celebrities masks the identities of those who possess true power—corporations and the oligarchic elite. And as we sink into an economic and political morass, as we barrel toward a crisis that will create more misery than the Great Depression, we are controlled, manipulated and distracted by the celluloid shadows on the wall of Plato’s cave. The fantasy of celebrity culture is not designed simply to entertain. It is designed to drain us emotionally, confuse us about our identity, make us blame ourselves for our predicament, condition us to chase illusions of fame and happiness and keep us from fighting back. And in the end, that is all the Jackson coverage was really about, another tawdry and tasteless spectacle to divert a dying culture from the howling wolf at the gate.




152 Comments so far
Show AllIs Time for more Swine flu coverage?
Or is it Time for the Demon Ahmadinejad?
GF
Have you seen the latest "Wipeout" ? ... truly Kafkaesque.
This is a classic article, and should probably be required reading in America.
Except ... who IS Chris Hedges? Is he beautiful, sexy, rich? If not, why should we listen to him ...
MichaelC
MichaelC
I hear he has an unsightly mole, which likely means his opinion cannot be trusted.
The Illusion of Grandeur for the average American is Crystalized by his car, mcmansion and big screen tv.
A person's belongings (and color of skin) give the scrutinizing public xray vision into his or her soul, and from this, the public concludes on the level of respect to be given to each person.
Great stuff, Mr. Hedges.
Love
Zero
We're just like Al Capone, in jail not for murder but for tax evasion and we die, not from the violence of our crimes, but from tertiary syphilis. Fitting, meet, and Just.
Peace.
Thank you Cris, I've been looking for someone to write with authority about that side of it.
Yea, Celebrating his skill set, regardless of how he came to develop such, has been my focus after his death. One cannot deny his talent, but his personal life was sad to hear of. He seemed to paint himself into a corner, unlike, say Lennon, who somehow did grow up.... in the end.
An intelligent and well expressed analysis of what North America has become. Unfortunately it will not reach and embody those who need to read this piece the most. They are too busy constructing or viewing their next reality show.
If it will not reach and embody those who need to read it most, how is it intelligent and well expressed? That would be like dumping food and water on the earth for those in need, knowing it will not reach them but believing that since you offer it freely it is a fine act of courage?
tw
Jillian is down to her last three bachelors... who do you think it will be?
Breathless in Bangor
I would expect something of this high quality from Chris Hedges, and his skill with words is unmatched.
Whether those who read those words learn from them---is another matter all together.
To be an individual in this society is to learn to live alone for the most part, and have little or no impact other than the positive effects of following your own path. This is reflected in the 'fashion' industry where wearing the latest 'label' is only another form of 'uniform' for 'fashion is for followers'---where 'style' is a statement. The current popularity of the verbal pause 'uhm', or the noun 'awesome', has become so habitual that I have learned to 'tune out what they are saying' just to count the many time they say 'uhm' or 'awesome'.
While the dominate society claims to revere 'individuality' in reality they punish 'individuality' with the dreaded seal of 'non recognition' or the 'death sentence of ignoring the individual'.
That someone so sick as M. Jackson, with limited skills and talent in a world that exalts mediocrity to the highest levels---at almost every aspect---is an indicator to some that to exclude yourself from all of this is in reality healthy and an intelligent choice of self preservation. To 'join in the madness' will only make you 'mad'.
Indeed those who survive the coming disasters that humanity has brought upon itself and the other life forms on the planet will require a very high level of individuality and a very clearly established level of self preservation which is never learned except by being an 'individual'.
Good Luck World, you really need it.
NativeSon,
Michael Jackson didn't have 'limited skills'. He wasn't 'mediocre'. He was the best dancer the world has seen. He invented his own genre of dance. I just happened to be living in my mom's house with the good TV when some of his stuff broke on MTV. See the Smooth Criminal and The Way You Make Me Feel videos on YouTube. The guy was a dance genius, no question.
Come on....."best dancer the world has seen." Maybe in that genre (the Moon Walk and the style now emulated by many) but this sweeping generalization is making me nauseus.
Think:
Mikhail Baryshnikov (not only a great ballet dancer but also way beyond MJ as far as being an athelete goes)
Gregory Hines
Gene Kelly
Fred Astaire
Ginger Rogers
Donald O'Connor
etc. etc. etc. and all those hundreds of others....
I'm sure glad all the fans aren't calling him the greatest SINGER ever. At least they had enough restraint in that area.
Perhaps he could be called one of the most POPULAR POP ENTERTAINERS. (not THE BEST, but one of...) But even that isn't true the past 15 or 20 years.
Enough of the exaggerations already....
Yet, go figure:
"Oh, God! That boy moves in a very exceptional way. That’s the greatest dancer of the century".
and
"I didn’t want to leave this world without knowing who my descendant was. Thank you Michael!"(shortly before F.A.'s death)
-- Fred Astaire
And since you mentioned singing:
"The only male singer who I’ve seen besides myself and who’s better than me – that is Michael Jackson."
–- Frank Sinatra
============
Of course, they were in a position to judge.
I'm impressed. Really. (no sarcasm)
Well, then, maybe I'm wrong. I respect Fred Astaire's & Frank Sinatra's opinion.
Anytime seethroughbs :) Thanks for being open-minded.
You are making the same sweeping generalisations.
Baryshnikov, and other ballet dancers such as Maya Plisetskaya were great ballet dancers. They were great at what they did.
Were they, are they better dancers than Jackson? NO. And I say this as someone who is a fan of Maya Plisetskaya, someone who is much more a watcher of ballet, than pop music.
They, Baryshnikov, Plisetskay, Jackson, were doing, and trying to do different things.
Not Allan
What, besides being NOT Allan, are you NOT? ...besides intelligent, of course.
All I got to say is that Michael Jackson was a good man.
He did love his Jesus Juice though.
Let's play Twister, Macaulay!
Another worthless post. It takes all kinds in CD.
Not Allan and winning ticket,
YOU BOTH totally have missed the point of the article and the point of NativeSon's commentary. Did you even read the article?
Ekaton you are way off base. All I said was Michael Jackson was a good man. I knew people that were close to me that knew the Jackson family (including Michael) and from what I understand they are beautiful people. I wasn't attacking Native Son or the article. I was responding to the malicious gossip in general, you know the common "Michael is a sicko" nonsense that seems to be in vogue. You and Native Son seemed to have jumped on that bandwagon.
Ekaton you are waste of space on this planet. You and Native son have reduced yourselves to the likes of wingnut Republican Congressman Peter King of New York who viciously slandered Jackson. You both are pseudoprogressive closeted wing nut Republicans trolling these boards. Get a life!
NativeSon
Uhhhmmm... why such a bummer dude? Didn't you get the positive message from last nights "Meteor"??? ...that Nothin' is too AWESOME fer us Merkins to overcome!
Shit Man, didn't you see the room temp IQ Barbie clone gettin gang raped in a Mezkin jail only to overcome her assailents and phone in the coordinants to Langley to save humanity. We ROCK!
Mr. Hedges comes incredibly close to creating the perfect commentary, exploring how Mr. Jackson's life reveals the vacuous morality of modern culture. Unfortunatly, like so many of our progressive voices, he chooses to enable this behavior by offering Jackson an agent of BLAME - some nebulous, indefinable corporate beast. The metaphor is hackneyed and stretched, at best. At any point in his adult life Mr. Jackson had available to him the ability to apply his own FREE WILL, and to CHOOSE a different behavior, a different path. To be sure, this path is challenging, and runs against the tide of a culture void of values and ultimate truths. We are left with the progressive ideal of values based on personal choice and personal convenience.
Finally, to blame this nebulous, indefinable, "coporate" culture is a total copout; and allows for us to place BLAME where it definitely DOES NOT belong, rathering than accepting that blame exists with each of us individually!; (forget the fact that there simply is no relationship between the culture of the entertainment industry and Wall Street "banks"; give me a break!)
This is the simplistic motto those who practice the libertarian religion often profess while bowing to the invisible hand of the market god--the fallen golden idol of Mammon. The old personal-responsibility-free-will-choose mantra-prayer in a perfect world with no contributing variables or shades of gray.
Speaking of copouts.
I suppose, then, that you are victimized by the "corporate" culture created by "Wall Street", and that your choices and path are not really your doing. Or, perhaps, you are uniquely immune, and subject only to your own free will! Which is it Vern?
And even more perhaps the next word to analyze is RESPONSIBILITY? We all have choices and we can all make choices. In making choices the man in the mirror makes the world a better place by changing it for all. Choose love, choose mercy, choose peace.
Amen, Sister!!
Cheers brother! :)
dpJr
For a resonably bright guy you missed one of the intellectual corners and drove into the ditch. Your hypothesis demands a sound functioning mind on the part of MJ, and that sadly went missing long ago.
Your final claim belies the closet Rupublican deep in what's left of your soul.
As much as I love Chris Hedges' writing, I disagree with this piece. Rudolph Valentino's funeral attracted bigger crowds and that was in 1926.
I never feel sorry for the rich and famous - hey, they knew it was a dangerous job when they took it.
As much as I love Chris Hedges' writing, I disagree with this piece. Rudolph Valentino's funeral attracted bigger crowds and that was in 1926.
I never feel sorry for the rich and famous - hey, they knew it was a dangerous job when they took it.
"We have a right, in the cult of the self, to get whatever we desire. We can do anything, even belittle and destroy those around us, including our friends, to make money, to be happy and to become famous. Once fame and wealth are achieved, they become their own justification, their own morality. How one gets there is irrelevant. It is this perverted ethic that gave us Wall Street banks and investment houses that willfully trashed the nation’s economy, stole money from tens of millions of small shareholders who had bought stocks to finance their retirement or the college expenses of their children. The heads of these corporations, like the winners on a reality television program who lied and manipulated others to succeed, walked away with hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation and bonuses. The ethic of Wall Street is the ethic of celebrity."
And still, the celebrity president, still wowing the crowd with his slick dance steps, uses his 15 minutes to prop it up for another 15 minutes at the cost of our life savings.
Vern: aye, aye!
A brilliant article, but what is its "point?" Perhaps, it's in the pointy head of the beholder, but I see a metaphor in the Jackson tragedy and the broader tragedy of American culture in developments in our political life. Did we not just elect another "celebrity" as President, a truly "rock star" who receives the waving arms and proto-orgasmic screams of not just teen age girls but supposed "adults" in the U.S. and around the world? This man is no "loser" but a winner in the reality show that quadrenially selects "America's newest idol."
And how did he win this contest? Well, largely by definitions of his opponents as "losers:" those like Dennis Kucinich, Ralph Nader or Cynthia McKinney whose views might be closer to those of most Americans---but of course those men and woman "couldn't win" and therefore could not be nominated or elected. In the end there were only two survivors on the island, and you had to vote for Cardboard Figure A or B; and it turns out it didn't matter much your choice, as the same controlling powers were those who "stand up" their cardboard icons.
Hedges speaks of ruthlessness in competition for stardom, and what more ruthless a competitor than Obama, who colluded with every act necessary to throw people under the bus who got in the way of his rise to stardom, from denouncing his "racist" white grandmother, to the deluded old uncle Jeremiah Wright, to "disappearing" Kucinich and Paul from the presidential debates, to demonizing H. Clinton as the Wicked Bitch of Arkansas, only to embrace her as his Secretary of State once political expediency demanded that?
As I write this today, we are about to see another political drama that will play out in a format more appropriate to Hollywood than to Washington D.C. Sonio Sotomayor will face "questioning" before the Senate Judiciary Committee but these "hearings" will largely be popularity posturings of Senators who are her supporters and opponents, who will make their defenses or attacks before a single minute of testimony has been given. The supporters will emphasize her inspiring "biography" and will ask us once again to "elevate" a slum dog into the ranks of the rich and famous millionaires: now who can vote against THAT? Her detractors will bloviate over the implications of her Latina identity and an off-hand remark about the superiority of judgment of such persons, agonizing on whether she can act "impartially" in rendering "justice." The whole thing will be like an audition to play a rock star role in American jurisprudence rather than any substantive discussion of WHAT decisions she might render as a Justice. If she's pressed too hard to say anything of substance about, say, the constitutionality of a President holding terrorism suspects in indefinite detention, she can fall back on the "pragmatism" for which Obama has praised her: we'll let the situation determine the decision; exactly the kind of permissiveness that has allowed Courts to be totally unpredictable in the pattern of their decisions.
But wait! Might not matter anyway what a Justice or a Court full of them might render in the way of decisions. On the advice of James MacGregor Burns---see his article posted here yesterday---it may not matter what a Court decides; a "transformational" President should if necessary declare a national emergency and do what he and Congress think is in the national interest regardless of a contravening Court decision. So---let the "game" go on; the Court anyway may deteriorate under the weight of its "pragmatic" judges and never render a decision that a President might nullify
Excellent Jerry! I believe it was President Obama's promises for change that had to go under the surgeons knife.
Superb comment, Jerry! It ought to be included as an "afterword" to Hedges' essay.
· Yr Obd't Servant
Thanks for the comment and suggestion YOS. I think I'm on a "no-fly" list for CD, as they have published nothing of the several articles I have sent them and I have to use these comments boards if I want to publish anything there. I can't even imagine a mechanism to do this if I tried to get my comments published as an "afterword" to the Hedges article.
See how much I avoid when I unplug my TV?
A high station in life is earned by the gallentry with which
appaling experiences are survived with grace - T. Williams
Rest in peace Michael, you did good!
Many thanks, Mr. Hedges, for a brilliant essay. I think we can trace one of the roots of the plague of moral nihilism that infects our nation in the fact that three generations of children from their infancy have been exposed to hours of Bernaysian consumerist propaganda daily, in front of their primary babysitter, commercial television. Anyone who is concerned about the mental health of their children, not to mention their own, should ban the major commercial media from their homes. Believe me, life is much more pleasant without it. Boycott!
Tony Vodvarka
I really look forward to reading Mr. Hedges articles. I've just finished reading Global Brain by Howard Bloom and I can't help but think that corporations are the main conformity enforcers of our time, what they decide to present to the masses. If you just look at the types of artists that they pick up and promote you see that style is all that matters. Granted if you search around you can find meaningful art, but search you must. This is why documentaries are doing well right now, many people are searching for depth and substance. We want discussion on important matters, but well get none of that from the major media. How little time (except Cheney) the media has given to torture and illegal spying by our government on its citizens. This obsession with train wreck stars must be our inability to understand why those that seem to have everything, that society tells us to emulate, that will make us happy does just the opposite, remember Howard Hughes, Marilyn Monroe. I remember some professor offering a course on happiness and he was overwhelmed by students wanting to sign up for his class. We are starting to realize the fairy tales are just that. We feel the emptiness of this consumer culture devoid of soul, we are above the fray of the christmas sale tramplings at Wal-Mart.
I wish I'd had this article to present to my spouse and children when one of my spouse's relatives appeared on reality shows several years ago and "won." It might have saved me a lot of anxiety and sadness because I was not able to adequately express my serious reservations about all the hoopla around it on TV and in the tabloids.
I had always been very careful about exposing my kids to this stuff. Never brought tabloids into the home. Monitored TV consumption. On the other hand, my spouse's attitude was "What's the big deal. It's entertainment."
My sixteen year old daughter, at the time, watched every episode with my spouse. I watched privately in another room to see if maybe I was overreacting. I was not. These episodes were not atypical for this kind of fare.
I had a real dilemma. Do I go along to get along for the sake of family "loyalty?" Or do I speak my truth as well as I can without trying to hurt or seeming to demean the contestant? After all the hoopla died down after a few months, I sat two of my young adult girls down to try to explain how I felt. Another of my young adult children knew from the start how I felt and was in agreement with my sentiments. I also had to broach the subject with my spouse who said I had a right to feel the way I feel, but didn't seem to understand how deeply I felt about the ramifications for our children's future in society with the relentless "cult of the self" being foisted upon us at every turn as something positive. These were difficult conversations, but my conscience and my job as a responsible parent were in peril if I did not speak up.
I thank Chris Hedges for his deep insight, honesty, and courage in all his writings.
Sioux Rose
INTEGRITY: Your children will always remember your honesty. The best gift a parent can give his children is his Truth. So many stay inside roles and never let their children sense or glimpse that real individual who's not always certain of his authoritarian role. You showed your human side.
Psychology battles over the relative impact of nurture (how a child is raised) versus nature (the inherited genetics, etc.) Even when raised in the same home by the same parents and encountering the same external conditions, children vary. I do not believe each is a blank slate at birth; but rather each enters with a blueprint. Upon it are already established (as legacy from former incarnations) predilections, talents, and propensities towards harsh lessons (i.e. where ego gets in the way). Thus the one child who "gets it," and resonates with your position is the one probably most evolved. The others will fulfill their own growth trajectories, but you did the right thing letting them know what is true for you.
As a parent who raised my children with many spiritual exposures, I must step aside as they "try on the world." Having been influenced by the Reagan culture (its barren focus on STUFF and gross materialism) they want those things. Although I see a SERIOUS recession ahead, I have no choice but to allow them to learn the great lesson that life's quality comes from within, and is not particularly attached to what one possesses. Of course that Truth lies in diametric opposition to everything that the commercial media (in service to mammon) articulates and offers.
Sioux Rose:
As always, I appreciate your observations. I have an anecdote about my personal experience with my own blueprint. I'd like to discuss it with you. If it's not too much to ask, would you please email me at mattcourtman@hotmail.com?
Peace,
Matt
She has a dedicated site of her own: siouxrose.com . She has written a lot of great articles and books. Very enlightening and worth a visit indeed.
Sioux Rose
J.B: Thanks for the plug! Since you're from the younger generation, far more computer savvy than I am, I wonder if I could hire you to help me market Moon Dance? I'd like to get something on Utube or Facebook. Got any ideas of how to go? Do I have to hire someone local to do a short video of me explaining it? Have you ever consulted on something like this?
Great piece by Mr. Hedges. The book, A Picture of Dorian Gray, comes to mind.
"It is the celebration of image over substance."
As is the Obama administration, which uses rhetorical flourishes to disguise its continuation of the same domestic and foreign policy depredations of every previous U.S. President, to the detriment of all of us as well as the planet.
Sioux Rose
Lots of GREAT comments, fellow CD'ers. Good work!
Since I was staying in the Florida Keys, my hostess watched the spectacle; and as she channel-surfed during commericals, there it was, the same lines repeated on all the networks. I finally had to ask that she turn it off.
What hit me was that Michael was treated like dirt when the allegations of child molestation echoed 'round the world; and suddenly, he's like the return of the Messiah as the crowds show homage to his fallen shell (body).
The main thing that hit me was that, as Mr. Hedge's brilliantly mentioned (he is an amazing writer able to connect dots few others even notice) this spectacle was given so much media time while the REAL issues human beings confront are too often given short shrift. Reality and its incessant demands apparently lies outside the purview of what mass culture stamps as "acceptable."
Indeed the lessons learned from Pavlov and Bernays are being applied through the engine of media, an efficient 24/7 tool of mass conditioning.
And VERN, very good response to Mr. "it's all about you," who seems to think every individual can swim against the massive cultural currents posed against him or her.
JERRY ROSE: Great post.