The Man in the Mirror
In celebrity culture we destroy what we worship. The commercial exploitation of Michael Jackson’s death was orchestrated by the corporate forces that rendered Jackson insane. Jackson, robbed of his childhood and surrounded by vultures that preyed on his fears and weaknesses, was so consumed by self-loathing he carved his African-American face into an ever changing Caucasian death mask and hid his apparent pedophilia behind a Peter Pan illusion of eternal childhood. He could not disentangle his public and his private self. He became a commodity, a product, one to be sold, used and manipulated. He was infected by the moral nihilism and personal disintegration that are at the core of our corporate culture. And his fantasies of eternal youth, delusions of majesty, and desperate, disfiguring quests for physical transformation were expressions of our own yearning. He was a reflection of us in the extreme.
His memorial service—a variety show with a coffin—had an estimated 31.1 million television viewers. The ceremony, which featured performances or tributes from Stevie Wonder, Brooke Shields and other celebrities, was carried live on 19 networks, including the major broadcast and cable news outlets. It was the final episode of the long-running Michael Jackson series. And it concluded with Jackson’s daughter, Paris, being prodded to stand in front of a microphone to speak about her father. Janet Jackson, before the girl could get a few words out, told Paris to “speak up.” As the child broke down, the adults around her adjusted the microphone so we could hear the sobs. The crowd clapped. It was a haunting echo of what destroyed her father.
The stories we like best are “real life” stories—early fame, wild success and then a long, bizarre and macabre emotional train wreck. O.J Simpson offered a tamer version of the same plot. So does Britney Spears. Jackson, by the end, was heavily in debt and had weathered a $22 million out-of-court settlement payment to Jordy Chandler, as well as seven counts of child sexual abuse and two counts of administering an intoxicating agent in order to commit a felony. We fed on his physical and psychological disintegration, especially since many Americans are struggling with their own descent into overwhelming debt, loss of status and personal disintegration.
The lurid drama of Jackson’s personal life meshed perfectly with the ongoing dramas on television, in movies and in the news. News thrives on “real life” stories, especially those involving celebrities. News reports on television are mini-dramas complete with a star, a villain, a supporting cast, a good-looking host and a dramatic, if often unexpected, ending. The public greedily consumed “news” about Jackson, especially in his exile and decline, which often outdid most works of fiction. In “Fahrenheit 451,” Ray Bradbury’s novel about a future dystopia, people spend most of the day watching giant television screens that show endless scenes of police chases and criminal apprehensions. Life, Bradbury understood, once it was packaged, scripted, given a narrative and filmed, became the most compelling form of entertainment. And Jackson was a great show. He deserved a great finale.
Those who created Jackson’s public persona and turned him into a piece of property, first as a child and finally as a corpse encased in a $15,000 gold-plated casket, are the agents, publicists, marketing people, promoters, script writers, television and movie producers, advertisers, video technicians, photographers, bodyguards, recording executives, wardrobe consultants, fitness trainers, pollsters, public announcers and television news personalities who create the vast stage of celebrity for profit. They are the puppet masters. No one achieves celebrity status, no cultural illusion is swallowed as reality, without these armies of cultural enablers and intermediaries. The producers at the Staples Center in Los Angeles made sure the 18,000 attendees and the television audience (even the BBC devoted three hours to the tribute) watched a funeral that was turned into another maudlin form of uplifting popular entertainment.
The memorial service for Jackson was a celebration of celebrity. There was the queasy sight of groups of children, including his own, singing over the coffin. Magic Johnson put in a plug for Kentucky Fried Chicken. Shields, fighting back tears, recalled how she and a 33-year-old Jackson—who always maintained that he was straight—broke into Elizabeth Taylor’s room the night before her last wedding to “get the first peek of the [wedding] dress.” Shields and Jackson, at Taylor’s wedding, then joked that they were “the mother and father of the bride.” “Yes, it may have seemed very odd to the outside,” Shields said, “but we made it fun and we made it real.” There were photo montages in which a shot of Jackson shaking hands with Nelson Mandela was immediately followed by one of him with Kermit the Frog. Fame reduces all of the famous to the same level. Fame is its own denominator. And every anecdote seemed to confirm that when you spend your life as a celebrity you have no idea who you are.
We measure our lives by these celebrities. We seek to be like them. We emulate their look and behavior. We escape the messiness of real life through the fantasy of their stardom. We, too, long to attract admiring audiences for our grand, ongoing life movie. We try to see ourselves moving through our lives as a camera would see us, mindful of how we hold ourselves, how we dress, what we say. We invent movies that play inside our heads with us as stars. We wonder how an audience would react. Celebrity culture has taught us, almost unconsciously, to generate interior personal screenplays. We have learned ways of speaking and thinking that grossly disfigure the way we relate to the world and those around us. Neal Gabler, who has written wisely about this, argues that celebrity culture is not a convergence of consumer culture and religion so much as a hostile takeover of religion by consumer culture.
Jackson desperately feared growing old. He believed he could control race and gender. He transformed himself through surgery and perhaps female hormones from a brown-skinned African-American male to a chalk-faced androgynous ghoul with no clear sexual identity. And while he pushed these boundaries to the extreme, he did only what many Americans do. There were 12 million cosmetic plastic surgery procedures performed last year in the United States. They were performed because, in America, most human beings, rich and poor, famous and obscure, have been conditioned to view themselves as marketable commodities. They are objects, like consumer products. They have no intrinsic value. They must look fabulous and live on fabulous sets. They must remain young. They must achieve notoriety and money, or the illusion of it, to be a success. And it does not matter how they get there.
The moral nihilism of our culture licenses a dark voyeurism into other people’s humiliation, pain, weakness and betrayal. Education, building community, honesty, transparency and sharing are qualities that will see you, in a gross perversion of democracy and morality, ridiculed and voted off any reality show. Fellow competitors for prize money and a chance for fleeting fame elect to “disappear” the unwanted. In the final credits of the reality show “America’s Next Top Model,” a picture of the woman expelled during the episode vanishes from the group portrait on the screen. Those cast aside become, at least to the television audience, nonpersons. Celebrities who can no longer generate publicity, good or bad, vanish. Life, these shows teach, is a brutal world of unadulterated competition and constant quest for notoriety and attention. And life is about the personal humiliation of those who oppose us. Those who win are the best. Those who lose deserve to be erased. Those who fail, those who are ugly or poor, are belittled and mocked. Human beings are used, betrayed and discarded in a commodity culture, which is pretty much the story of Jackson’s life, although he experienced the equivalent of celebrity resurrection. This has been very good for his music sales and perhaps for his father’s new recording company, which Joe Jackson made sure to plug at public events after his son’s death. Compassion, competence, intelligence and solidarity are useless assets when human beings are commodities. Those who do not achieve celebrity status, who do not win the prize money or make millions in Wall Street firms, deserve their fate.
The cult of self, which Jackson embodied, dominates our culture. This cult shares within it the classic traits of psychopaths: superficial charm, grandiosity and self-importance; a need for constant stimulation, a penchant for lying, deception and manipulation; and the incapacity for remorse or guilt. Jackson, from his phony marriages to his questionable relationships with young boys, had all these qualities. This is also the ethic promoted by corporations. It is the ethic of unfettered capitalism. It is the misguided belief that personal style and personal advancement, mistaken for individualism, are the same as democratic equality. It is the celebration of image over substance.
We have a right, in the cult of the self, to get whatever we desire. We can do anything, even belittle and destroy those around us, including our friends, to make money, to be happy and to become famous. Once fame and wealth are achieved, they become their own justification, their own morality. How one gets there is irrelevant. It is this perverted ethic that gave us Wall Street banks and investment houses that willfully trashed the nation’s economy, stole money from tens of millions of small shareholders who had bought stocks to finance their retirement or the college expenses of their children. The heads of these corporations, like the winners on a reality television program who lied and manipulated others to succeed, walked away with hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation and bonuses. The ethic of Wall Street is the ethic of celebrity.
The saturation coverage of Jackson’s death is an example of our collective flight into illusion. The obsession with the trivia of his life conceals the despair, meaninglessness and emptiness of our own lives. It deflects the moral questions arising from mounting social injustice, growing inequalities, costly imperial wars, economic collapse and political corruption. The wild pursuit of status, wealth and fame has destroyed our souls, as it destroyed Jackson, and it has destroyed our economy.
The fame of celebrities masks the identities of those who possess true power—corporations and the oligarchic elite. And as we sink into an economic and political morass, as we barrel toward a crisis that will create more misery than the Great Depression, we are controlled, manipulated and distracted by the celluloid shadows on the wall of Plato’s cave. The fantasy of celebrity culture is not designed simply to entertain. It is designed to drain us emotionally, confuse us about our identity, make us blame ourselves for our predicament, condition us to chase illusions of fame and happiness and keep us from fighting back. And in the end, that is all the Jackson coverage was really about, another tawdry and tasteless spectacle to divert a dying culture from the howling wolf at the gate.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
152 Comments so far
Show AllMichael Jackson: What We See Is What We Look Like
There is no end to the commentary concerning the death of Michael Jackson and mine certainly warrants no special attention: nevertheless, I am slightly embarrassed to say how much his death has affected me. I have been a great admirer of his talent since I was a child; as most of us, I grew up listening and watching him evolve as an artist and reach the heights of stardom that I believe will never be surpassed…we no longer have a culture (or an attention span) to allow even the most deserving of talents rise and remain at the top of their fields. Our standards in so many respects have declined to even expect mediocrity: we are relieved to see it, as most of the talent now falls so far below it…
I have taken it upon myself to observe the collection of interviews, appearances, photographs, and other media on Michael Jackson during the course of his forty-five year career. What has struck me most about his personality (if, indeed, it can serve as insight to his character) is the alarming consistency of it. I say alarming only because most of us grow out of our childlike wonder at the world and the idealism in helping those in need, and making the world and its future better and brighter for others as well as ourselves. Mr. Jackson’s interviews as a child serve to show the influence of his family’s religion; as a Jehovah’s Witness, the strict beliefs that denied him holidays, birthdays, and the many forms of amusement such as television and movies and games that most children take for granted as their province. Being fully employed by the age of nine, Mr. Jackson had only his family, a large one, granted, but still a small cramped corner to grow up and cultivate a sense of self from: meanwhile, his exposure to the outside world of other people was distorted by fame, and the outrageous expectations that come with anxious and adoring crowds…how, indeed, does this shape the perspective of a child? I don’t wonder ever of his love for children and animals, undoubtedly the only company that never wanted or expected anything from him. I daresay it gave him a liberty from a repressive religion, suffocating family bond, a grueling work schedule, and a unruly mob of fans that held no end of comfort for him, even into his aging years…
Michael Jackson’s battle with vitiligo and lupus has been confirmed: suffering from gradual de-pigmentation and joint inflammation in front of the world must have taken a great deal of confidence from him as a performer: it made him a public spectacle in a way he never wished to be seen and shown. Why after thirty years of being born and raised into unprecedented stardom as a Black man, Mr. Jackson would decide to “become White,“ has been accused, but never explained. Alas, heavy makeup, ornate dress to completely cover his body took more than a physical toll; it took an emotional one, as his appearance was ridiculed even as he made desperate attempts to prevent it. Mr. Jackson directed our attention to his performance, more singing, dancing, fireworks, all the glitter and glamour and sparkle he could muster until we didn’t believe what we saw, but we loved it…therein lies the real magic of his talent, I believe, he convinced us he was beauty and grace even as his skin spotted and his limbs crippled behind the curtain…
Michael Jackson’s ordeal with accusations of child molestation are sad….I worked as a voluntary on three psych wards and have some indirect experience with pedophiles. He is certainly uncharacteristic of any I have spoken and dealt with outside of his love for children. A pedophile surrounded by children for four decades: two allegations surfaced with a nearly ten-year interval: the illogical sequence in the course of events should have been comical…should have been. The real argument is how many have allegations have not surfaced in the forty years….What will strike you about any repeat offender of such sex-related crimes is cunning: building an amusement park for thousands of children to run and play in; to openly admit you share your bed with them, to spend no less than twenty years of your life expressing how much children motivate and inspire you is no show of cunning, I can tell you. A pedophile would immediately open himself to suspicion under such candor. I believe Michael Jackson’s lack of exposure to our socially accepted hypocrisy failed to learn the rules of the games we play with one another. There is something pathetic about Michael Jackson’s statements and arguments: he seems to be genuinely telling the truth and expecting it to matter…the rest of us in the real world know better.
(continued)
You are not innocent before proven guilty; if acquitted, it doesn’t mean you cannot be condemned…individuality can only be expressed if it is in accordance to what everybody else would do and be…if you are a man, be “how all men are,” or you will be labeled a homosexual, and you know what that means: a freak of nature, which will open you up to all sorts of allegations and assumptions, particularly when it comes to your relations with children and the paternity of your own.
The biggest star the world was beaten by a windfall of public scorn, a far more powerful weapon than any military force could wield…we pride ourselves on being able to say and do what we want, live and believe how we want: we indulge our delusions, don’t we? Try living in this world and this society where your love for nature, animals, children, family and friends made you a suspect; where your abstinence from drugs, alcohol, and sexual promiscuity made you a freak; where your compassion for the sick and the suffering, your aspirations for world peace and justice made you pathetic; where forgiving those who manipulated, exploited and wronged you made you deserving of being dragged through courts and drugged to keep the money-making machine oiled…in short, made you Michael Jackson.
I don’t pretend to know the truth of this man’s life…I can only seek to know it. I have sought it through his own words and the words of those who knew him. I have sought it in his art, his music and performances. I believe Michael Jackson’s life and death have much to say about what our society has become, clouded in delusions of freedom and liberty, in our aberrations of what it means to be good and decent.
Was Michael Jackson a good and decent man? I don’t know for certain; what I do know is, the qualities he was most ridiculed for are the ones we as a people are supposed to honor and celebrate in a human being, and his battles were something for which we are supposed to show compassion and understanding…
I believe his Michael Jackson’s decade-span give a baleful testimony of American society.
We saw Michael Jackson through the years from our own eyes…
What we see is what we look like...
Thank you for taking the time to read.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6075401
Catherine, you are a guardian angel. For Micheal and us all.
Thank you.
Catherina
Thank you for taking the time to comment on Michael Jackson.
We really all are 'The Man in the Mirror', and its reflection reveals a sorted vanity.
Just like the film Rashomon what we see is our own reflection.
Ric Tailcap July 14th, 2009 3:40 pm wrote
"Roseanne Barr and her co-host (i think its Johnny Argent) had a tasteless radio show on Pacifica's KPFK in which they spent almost the whole show"
I also did listen to that show hosted by roseanne and her co-host. I found the episode revolting. It was almost as if Roseane and her cohost became somehow unglued and lost all restrain. Very strange. I did not realize her co-host had that in him. You can check the archived show on KPFK.org. It aired on 7/8/09. It just reminded me of the the visceral role race plays in the subliminal conciousness of both the political right and left.
The Botton line is that Michael had little control on how the press chose to potray him, how often they did or the boycott of his music by hollywood executives for nearly 5 years before his death.
I retract my statement concerning Chris Hedges understanding of ‘African Americans’ in the U.S.
His article on Tearyan Brown:
http://www.alternet.org/workplace/141275/we_offer_riches_and_perks_for_corrupt_cronies%2C_and_crumbs_f...
It shows an understanding that I first found lacking in his article.
I still feel however his article would have been more powerful leaving out any reference to Michael Jackson.
Al Sharpton quoted from the memorial service to Michael Jackson directed to his children: “Wasn’t nothin’ strange about your daddy; it was strange what your daddy had to deal with..."
This is the ending of the current July 20 New Yorker article about the Michael Jackson memorial service written by Nancy Franklin.
http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/television/2009/07/20/090720crte_television_franklin
Someone pointed me here because I wrote a post with the exact same title and central thesis on my blog:
http://theshallowbrigade.blogspot.com/2009/07/man-in-mirror.html
...on the same day, no less. So it's interesting to me that I disagree with so many of your points. You make celebrity culture sound like a conspiracy devised by "cultural enablers and intermediaries," going so far as to label them "puppet masters." Then you conflate the whole shebang with corporate America.
You talk a lot about Them; what about Us? What ever happened to personal responsibility?
Everyone has a right to their opinion, but who really cares anyway.
My opinion, should anyone care, is that mankind thinks he is an advanced, intelligent, flashy and beautiful creature when in actuality he is nothing more than a greedy, vicious little monkey that got lucky.
All the vicious little monkies on this planet are going to wipe themselves out and be long forgotten and will surely not be missed by any other living creature.
It is all so amusing, and sad. What a waste and a shame while the little monkies play with little shiny objects and other meaningless nonsense.
First, let us consider (as many already are) that it is and was the MSM that presented the image of Micheal Jackson that would make the most money. Our food also is turned into a hybrid monster by the market through GMO's to present an image that will sell. If you believe in the image and do not consider the purpose of those selling it, then you misunderstand who the image is of. The image of Micheal Jackson as presented by entertainment and media outlets has more to do with them than the real Micheal Jackson that non of us ever can have claimed to have seen or known in a material way. There are few people who knew him in this real and personal way, and we should listen intently to them if we would like to see the real picture. Unless you know someone personally and intimately it is difficult to know them with our human mental constructs as they are normally developed in today's culture. Chris would show more insight if he called his article the MSM in the mirror, and kept the disfigurement that his brain envisioned with Micheal, specifically where it belonged, with the MSM. Instead, Chris himself seems to have bought more fully into that illusion than most here, and he believes that Micheal is this illusion presented by MSM or that illusion presented by MSM. Oh what a sticky web we weave when first we practice to be deceived?
Chris Hedges could of easily made his point about ‘celebrity’ and the media without going into a character assignation of Michael Jackson.
Yes, Chris Hedges is a gifted writer, but his article went off track because he does not appreciate nor understand African American culture. He thought from his vantage point he could use Michael Jackson to focus on his thesis. He made the wrong assumption.
Read the great quantity of responses and it is evident that his thesis got lost in his use of Michael Jackson as a platform.
If anything has been learned from Chris Hedges article it is that racism is still the undercurrent of American Culture, and a great writing style can not mask this fact.
"Chris Hedges could of easily made his point about ‘celebrity’ and the media without going into a character assignation of Michael Jackson."
-I agree
Roseanne Barr and her co-host (i think its Johnny Argent) had a tasteless radio show on Pacifica's KPFK in which they spent almost the whole show railing against Michael Jackson and the wall-to-wall 24/7 "news" coverage he received.
Normally, I agree with a lot she and he say but on Michael Jackson they sounded so self-righteous and judgmental that it really turned me off. Imagine spending an hour talking about all the coverage being given to Michael Jackson. It was like a pot calling a kettle black. They just wouldn't let it go.
They then brought in one of Michael's childhood friends and badgered him over and over to provide them with: "something we don't already know about Michael". Nothing he said was good enough for them. They would cut him off and tell him to get to the point.
Barr and Argent also jumped on him and said they had no sympathy for well-heeled millionaires. They also ignored or belittled the fact Michael had given and left a lot to charities. They weren't impressed.
When Michael's friend naturally stood up for him and denied Michael had molested children they went on the attack. They implied the fact Michael was a pederast was a foregone conclusion. At he end of the show when they thank their producers etc. they neglected to even mention him. That was rude.
I don't know what Michael Jackson did or didn't do but I'll leave up to God to judge him. I say leave him alone, he's dead now.
BTW I have watched a grand total of about 2-3 minutes of MJackson coverage and that was in the very beginning. In spite of being on vacation and having all day to do whatever I want, I skipped the funeral on TV too.
Look how y'all got drawn into the luvfest, but before the corporate media made a martyr out of Jackson, chances are most of you now prostrating yourselves before his golden casket considered him a has-been if not a freak (the previous directive of the MSM).
You make Hedges point.
Suckers.
Vern
I refuse to accept your label as a ‘Sucker’; name calling is not what dialogue should be as its end product.
Obviously, by the number of responses, your conclusion that Chris Hedges proved his point is not clear or totally accepted by all.
I do wish that Chris Hedges would address these many responses, and I doubt he would call those of us who objected to his essay a ‘Sucker’.
I love CH's pieces. "...carved his face into a Caucasian death mask," "variety show with a coffin," Mandela & Kermit, "wolves at the gate"... Most of it dramatic, and some of it profound. What's not to like?
Still, a lot of this stuff is just morally self-righteous ranting that could potentially be just as dangerous as the irreality it attacks.
Celebrity culture isn't new. And the nasty spectacles of "reality TV" are nothing next to Rome's gladiatorial games, England's drawing and quartering, etc. ad infinitum. Sycophants and enablers have been around since time immemorial.
Yes, today's society sucks--but the real perpetrator is human nature itself, which seems to remain pretty constant.
And pretty universal. CH blames society for abusing MJ, but then continues the abuse himself with ad hominem attacks. To what purpose? Poor MJ was beaten as a kid, and subject to impossibly mixed messages through his entire life. It's not surprising that he went nuts. It's not even interesting. But CH picks it up and flails it around--doing his very own version of the moonwalk!
Is there anything we can do about human nature (other than die out, as we have been preprogrammed to do)? I would like to hear more about that, and altogether less about MJ.
"Is there anything we can do about human nature (other than die out, as we have been preprogrammed to do)? I would like to hear more about that, and altogether less about MJ"
I think the answer lies in title of this essay, "Man in the Mirror". As you probably know, it's a Jackson song and the refrain goes like this:
I'm Starting With The Man In
The Mirror
I'm Asking Him To Change
His Ways
And No Message Could Have
Been Any Clearer
If You Wanna Make The World
A Better Place
(If You Wanna Make The
World A Better Place)
Take A Look At Yourself, And
Then Make A Change
And actually, though Hedges makes his point here in that very passionate way that nearly blows you away when you read it and can be somewhat off-putting, this is no new theme for him.
His message is, quit being used and starting looking at the real things in life...just because Michael and a host of others couldn't do it is no excuse.
Keep reading Chris Hedges and read a few of his books--my personal favorite is "War is a Force that Gives us Meaning"--and you will start to see his points.
Could not present this point better nick, thanks.
From the beginning it became clear, this must be a different Michael Jackson than the one I know. Hedges talks about Jackson as if he was Milosevic, S. Hussein or any other massmurderer in history.
Where is his piece about Michael Jackson when the latter one was still around? Where?
Some people feel strongly compelled to judge others, some only judge dead people for obvious reasons.
Michael Jackson was in more than one way different to say the least. To be where he was requires a tremendous stability. Something he only had in his music.
Throwing stones out of a glasshouse is not a real smart thing to do. Better to understand that there is not one single human Being on Earth (except the Dalai Lama probably) that walks over water. We are all mentally disabled. Some more, others less.
May All Beings Be Blessed.
No Restrictions Or Limitations Shall Apply.
Hedges article is not about Michael Jackson per se, but about the corruption and illness of American culture -- of which the creation and worship of celebrity is just one decadent dimension.
And as if to prove Hedges' overriding point, look at how many posters here get sucked into focusing on the personalissima of Michael Jackson -- to the exclusion of the article's direly far more important observations.
It is terrifying to see one's culture, especially a culture as huge, powerful, and influential as The USA's, going steadily more mad.
Even as many of its victims gropingly seek to analyze and heal themselves of its poison, the poison is unsuspectingly reproduced.
I presume no generic superiority over any other human being, by saying this, since I am unwontedly hypnotized and poisoned by the culture, too -- though not in the dimension of subjective celebrity worship.
I think all of us USA'ers now more than ever need to keep emotionally probing ourselves, even beyond what we can bear; to see where and how we've gone wrong in constructing our self-identities and the distorted culture that misshapes our identities.
Nor do we need to know exactly who thinkers like Mr Hedges are, personally, in order to value their attempts at rigorous honesty -- lest we trope to raise fellows like HIM, too, to one more worshipped guru/celebrity.
The re-discovery of a healthy Self, especially by masses of people, is no easy matter in a culture muchly gone, and going ever more, mad.
But it certainly can be done, wherever Self-to-Other humaneness begins to be sincerely re-sought and personally re-embodied -- day to day in the simplest ways.
"I think all of us USA'ers now more than ever need to keep emotionally probing ourselves, even beyond what we can bear; to see where and how we've gone wrong in constructing our self-identities and the distorted culture that misshapes our identities.
Nor do we need to know exactly who thinkers like Mr Hedges are, personally, in order to value their attempts at rigorous honesty -- lest we trope to raise fellows like HIM, too, to one more worshipped guru/celebrity.
The re-discovery of a healthy Self, especially by masses of people, is no easy matter in a culture muchly gone, and going ever more, mad.
But it certainly can be done, wherever Self-to-Other humaneness begins to be sincerely re-sought and personally re-embodied -- day to day in the simplest ways."
Excellent input ontondo! Thank you. :)
Sometimes the canyon between artists and intellectuals can be very wide.
Yes, the canyon between 'the people who want to remake the world in their own image' and 'those who are careful' can be vast.
Especially if 'their own image' has been fabricated by the sellers of image enhancers.
Meanwhile, Hedges forgets the fact that Michael helped bring people of different races together, was a philanthropist, socially conscious (not all of his songs were about dancing and getting girls, even I as a very, very casual MJ fan know that), and in his own way challenged traditional views of masculinity among other things.
Michael was not trying to be white. Again, he suffered from vitiligo, a very real pigment disorder. I know whites that have it along with blacks. His rhinoplasties resulted from a broken nose he suffered from years ago. He was self-conscious because his abusive parents kept telling him he was ugly as a child.
IT WAS NEVER PROVEN THAT HE MOLESTED CHILDREN. IN FACT THERE'S MORE PROOF THAT THE ACCUSERS WERE OPPORTUNISTS.
Yes, Michael was flawed. He was unwell for many years, mentally, emotionally, and physically. And I get tired of people making him into a saint touched by divinity. But on the other hand, I also get tired of people demonizing him.
Can anyone smell the racism and homophobia here?
MJ was a black guy who unintentionally and intentionally blurred racial lines. He was also effeminate and spoke, sang and danced accordingly. The unproven allegations regarding what he did with teenage boys play into homophobia as well.
Did people villify R. Kelly for supposedly fooling around with GIRLS?
Not to say that any sex with minors is acceptable, but there seems to be a double standard afoot.
"That someone so sick as M. Jackson, with limited skills and talent in a world that exalts mediocrity to the highest levels---at almost every aspect---is an indicator to some that to exclude yourself from all of this is in reality healthy and an intelligent choice of self preservation."
How was he mediocre? Because he wasn't performing classical, jazz, or ballet?
If you don't like MJ or his music, shut the hell up. Christ, I'm a white guy metalhead (bring the tomatoes assholes), and I own not one of his CD's btw.
As far as Hedge's essay goes, I couldn't read it thoroughly past the first few paragraphs.
"Blah, blah, blah, Americans are stupid and self-obsessed, blah, blah, blah. I'm SUPERIOR to all of these sheep whom I feign concern for but deep down truly loathe."
Hedges illustrates one problem with the Left. There are too many upper-middle class white folks waving degrees in everyone's faces speaking for the movement.
And yeah, the coverage has been excessive. I agree.
BUT WHAT THE LIVING FUCK DID YOU EXPECT, CHRIS? YOU KNEW IT WOULD BE A MAJOR MEDIA EVENT IF AND WHEN IT HAPPENED! IF IT BOTHERS YOU TURN OFF YOUR TV!
Tell ya what Chris. Go to Gary, Indiana or Harlem and tell all those folks to get a life why don't you? Go spew your pretentious, misanthropic, elitist psychotwaddle at them. Prepare to get an earful.
Asshole.
I know you hate my music too. I HOPE you do. It wasn't meant for people like you.
Go on a right-wing message board, and look at the trolls celebrate the death of "that faggot nigger."
One more thing. The outpouring of love and sympathy across racial, ethnic, and national lines in the wake of Michael's death SHOULD give people at least a little hope.
If it doesn't, please go fuck yourself. The rest of the world has no use for you.
The networks did not want to be outdone in ratings, and so all felt compelled to carry Michael Jackson's funeral. It wasn't a lovefest for Michael; it was a goldmine for the networks. That seemed to me to be Hedges' point.
Entertainment/celebrity worship so permeates our surroundings, and distracts us, so that we then devote very little and not enough time to the issues that affect our everyday lives ... like racism, poverty, and the massive stranglehold that corporations have on us in every area including health care, banking, home ownership, higher education, liveable wages, etc.
I mourn for Michael Jackson, and admire the good that he did. But the over-the-top coverage left little space for crucial issues affecting the people most in need in this country ... those that he seemed to care about. Meanwhile, many in Congress are fighting to prevent a public option in health insurance and also resisting efforts to help those foreclosed upon because they favor more privileges for bankers and the Goldman Sachs of the world. We should be devoting every spare minute we have to speak out for the common good ... not the good of the upper 2%. We can't afford round-the-clock celebrity distraction being foisted upon us by the corporate culture (their weapons of mass distraction).
Despite the strong language, to be polite, I wholeheartedly agree. The most incomprehensible thing for me is, why does the guy write about Michael Jackson? Does the guy make money off of his smear works or not? Finally in my opinion this hateful piece is the most shameful article about a dead person. It's like writing all kinds of crap, because the dead can't talk back.
If Micheal would have been my brother, or my child, or my uncle or anyhow part of my family, Hedges would be sued for libel.
What an opportunistic and tasteless crook.
May All Beings Be Blessed.
No Restrictions Or Limitations Shall Apply.
Nobody can judge this man. He was a commodity at age five. He probably knew more pain than any of us.
Everybody does the best they can with what they have.
Are you delusional?!? "Everybody does the best they can with what the have."?????? Is everyone on this sight prepared to make excuses for ALL behaviors? Is there no personal responsibility??? You people are insane!
What disturbs me the most about Mr. Hedges is his apparent ability to take the mainstream circus and cultivate it to his own progressive sounding rhetoric. I normally enjoy reading his material, but this one is way below the belt. Being an unwhite American has opened my eyes to how we blacks are treated in a culture that preys on taking advantage of people.
MJ lived his life the best way he knew how with the diseases he had. There's no reason to have to try and understand why someone doesn't have a problem showing people love. When you love what you do, it shows. And MJ loved to entertain people and bring them good music. He was a perfectionist, which many of you may know a lot about.
If you'd like to correlate the catastrophe of all the media attention of MJ to other issues in the world, think how Cynthia McKinney feels when all she sees in the news is Sarah Palin, instead of her and all the things she is trying to do in Gaza.
Mr. Hedges, you've lost a reader who really thought you understood about the culture of America. Maybe you should walk around in black face before writing an article like this.
msmutt07
Please do not give up on Chris Hedges; I was among the group that told Chris Hedges he was way off target with his insinuation that Michael Jackson was an ‘apparent pedophile’. It was inexcusable and as a journalist it was an error of the highest degree.
As a journalist Chris Hedges made the kind of error that fed the McCarthy Era of the 50’s. The phrase ‘apparent pedophile’ sounded like an ‘apparent member of the Communist Party’.
Let us give Chris Hedges the chance to address this error before we write him off. It is obvious to people of color that Chris Hedges has much to learn about how non white people view our culture.
Maybe it's true that Hedges "made the kind of error that fed the McCarthy era," but that isn't the same thing as being a McCarthyite. It means Hedges may be living in the same kind of era, only in regards to being a pedophile.
For this reason, I think he's right when he suggests that celebrity worship/loathing says more about spectatorship than it does about the celeb's particular virtues/faults.
Why are we watching these people fart 24 hours a day?
I agree with those that say leave Michael Jackson alone. He's dead. Let God judge him.
Hedges though, is talking about society's obsession with celebrities and how the PTB use it to keep us distracted from the real issues. We have been O'simpsonized, Britneyspearized, Mjackonized etc. etc. Hedges makes good points about that.
Although I find a man having sexual relations with a boy to be abhorrent it hasn't always been so:
"Ancient Greece not only encouraged pederasty, they institutionalized it. They considered it as a way for men to instill virtue in young boys. Although the sexual side of the relationship was the most infamous part of it, it was also a spiritual relationship as well." -MJR Yahoo Answers
Lastly, I can't tell you what I would do to a man if I caught him having sex with my 14 year old daughter, however Edgar Allan Poe married his 13 year old cousin and he is generally held in high regard. His homes have been turned into museums and he has landmarks named after him.
Society has ALWAYS been obsessed with celebrities, within the technological limits available to that particular society. It isn't just modern American culture, even American culture.
For example, in the medieval ages, royalty, the nobility, were the celebs. And their lives were dissected, and speculated on, by everyone. Obviously there was no 24 hour cable channels, and no internet then.
First I need to say, damn Hedges you can write! Brilliant!
Then on the issue, capitalism will soon lay in repose alongside the King of Pop.
No telling how much damage it will do to the planet and how many humans will be left alive to pick up the pieces and how twisted they will be left by capitalism-generated pathologies. But thankfully, it will be dead. And the survivors will at least have an opportunity to rebuild human civilization around the values you correctly point out are reviled now, education, building community, honesty, transparency and sharing.
That's the key one Chris: sharing. You are talking about socialism. You've written of socialism before and I don't think you fully understand it. It will be the most profound form of democracy, a dictatorship of productive people commonly called workers, that will mandate that all of us share, all of us! No wealthy people, no Forbes 500, no corporations or any other capitalist entities.
It's the only way we will live into the future.
"another tawdry and tasteless spectacle to divert a dying culture from the howling wolf at the gate"
Is Chris talking about the Michael Jackson Rock-Around-the-Wake Celebrity Reunion, or the Death of Jesus Christ?
I usually like Chris Hedges' essays, but I find him wrong on many things here. I was watching the Memorial on a huge screen TV at work. While the Jackson brothers were talking, Janet turned to Paris and mouthed "Do you still want to?" Paris smiled and shook her head yes enthusiastically. When they got to the podium, Paris WANTED to say something. They simply were trying to help her by telling her to speak up because the child did not know how to speak in front of a mike to a large audience.
Plus, the first child who accused MJ of molestation has just said it was all a LIE that his father made him tell in order to extort money from MJ because his father was in financial straits. But the major media won't cover his admission -- big surpise NOT. In the second case, he was ACQUITTED. Thousands of children enjoyed Neverland while MJ was not even there. So STOP THE CRAP of the continual labeling of MJ as a pedofile when there isn't one d*mn bit of proof it happened. Elizabeth Taylor was even in the room that night and said they all just watched cartoons together and NOTHING happened. I assume that Child #2 will one day also break his silence and admit it did not happen.
INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty ring a bell, CH? Oh, that's right, that was all a lie like the rest of the so-called democracy in this country.
This notion of innocent until proven guilty is limited to a jury trial in a courtroom. I don't presume Jackson's innocent, it was apparent to me, along with almost everyone else on the planet that this guy was a pedophile. So what? Do I think he was a pedophile, damn right I do, and no apologies for it. I'm probably right, I don't know for sure, but far more likely than not. Obviously, I could not have served and would not have agreed to serve on his jury. Jurors presume innocence, the rest of us are free to look at all the facts and circumstances and reach our own conclusions.
Remember, being aquitted of a crime is not the same thing as being innocent. That's why civil trials for money damages often follow acquittals and result in a different verdicts finding liability and awarding money damages. See the case of O.J. Simpson and Robert Blake.
Thank God you don't run the justice department. Everybody would be guilty before proven innocent.
Can you substantiate your claim about the molestation issue?
q
Wow- this is an excellent piece. Hedges effectively pulls together the strands of culture, economy, personal self-worth and consumerism and gives them a powerful jerk. I, too, found the maudlin, self-conscious circus of a funeral to be in horrible bad taste...but I'm sure it was great entertainment to a lot of Americans.
"We, too, long to attract admiring audiences for our grand, ongoing life movie. We try to see ourselves moving through our lives as a camera would see us, mindful of how we hold ourselves, how we dress, what we say. We invent movies that play inside our heads with us as stars. We wonder how an audience would react. Celebrity culture has taught us, almost unconsciously, to generate interior personal screenplays. We have learned ways of speaking and thinking that grossly disfigure the way we relate to the world and those around us."
If I were to pinpoint the one sickness that is going to kill us, this would be it, because it keeps us from knowing what is right, from acting with integrity, and from dealing with adult matters (like um...climate change? Energy depletion?) with maturity.
"The fantasy of celebrity culture is not designed simply to entertain. It is designed to drain us emotionally, confuse us about our identity, make us blame ourselves for our predicament, condition us to chase illusions of fame and happiness and keep us from fighting back."
Love the title of this article.
Just whom is Hedges addressing?
How does Mr Hedges know Michael Jackson was a pedophile? Media reports. Strategic settlements? For those among us who followed the only case that camne to trial, have we forgotten the bizarre testimony of the witnesses and accusers. Reminded me of the McMartin Childcare case of the 1980s. We cannot condemn media unless they serve our own whims. Media lies shall live on forever. Afterall they cater to our primitive instincts. Michael Jackson is just the most current of a long long list of black public figures who have stimulated acute attention from the rabble and their self appointed knights. For enquiring minds check out this link:http://www.counterpunch.org/reed06292009.html
Whatever sells
Yes, Chris Hedges, you nailed the necrosis that is gradually destroying the nation.
The People magazine celebrity culture is a designer drug meant to turn the people into sheeple, to turn the citizens into consumers of the trash culture and its innumerable illusions, to rob them of any sense of being active and self-determining individuals and thereby of keeping them in a state of political infantilism.
I used to read Life Magazine, but found it too...vague. So, I switched to People Magazine, but that was too...popular. I then switched to Us Magazine, but found it too...broad. Finally, I've found the magazine that suits what is important to me. Best of all, I can read it with so many like-minded people: Me Magazine.
The only problem is that I'm being wooed by another magazine that defines my interests in a more concise way: I Magazine.
P.S. Every one of these magazines exists.
P.P.S. I'd love to take credit for this, but someone beat me to this shtick - I just don't remember Who. (yes, Who Magazine also exists)
From article's conclusion: "It is designed to drain us emotionally, confuse us about our identity, make us blame ourselves for our predicament, condition us to chase illusions of fame and happiness and keep us from fighting back"
Chris describes the function of our mainstream corporate media beautifully, the most expensive and sophisticated propaganda machine in the history of the world.
To socialist July 13th, 2009 2:40 pm: Yes, indeed!
The celebrity culture and the trash culture in general are part of the most brutally ideological machinery ever produced in the history of humanity.
Hedges is the best writer on CD.
And, yes, his conclusion nails it!
But I have to wonder, is this celebrity culture, this "brutally ideological machinery," the "most expensive and sophisticated propaganda machine in the history of the world," premeditated or a consequence of American culture?
If a consequence then we have a long journey on the same road. Where are the artist?
To phasor July 13th, 2009 6:06 pm:
Is it premeditated, you ask? Yes, it is, as is any great, systematic crime (say, any great bank robbery).
That is why I called it a 'designer drug'. Typically, a designer drug is designed, fashioned quite deliberately.
There is a will to keep the many dumb, infantile, shoddily informed or uninformed, barely educated, and perpetually dissatisfied with their toys, always wanting more and new ones. The craving for novelty and the restlessness of the addicted hoi poloi are induced by a vast network of hucksters and pushers.
My crude, short answer is outlined by reading about Edward Bernays, (and Walter Lippmann) as some of the people who developed and recognized the power of creating, or synthesizing demand; they are considered the godfathers of the modern public relations and advertising industries.
The masses must be molded and conditioned into model citizens who think a certain way and do what they are told (ie. consume products). Once private interests jumped on board this PR/marketing/advertising industry our culture was slowly transformed into what it is today.
This is not the only factor but a huge one. It is no surprise to find out those who control messages and information (especialy TV) wield a huge amount of power. Private interests, and their political lackeys who also benefit, are the prime movers.
This brilliant piece also applies to our celebrity president who has lost hold of the significant substance that he seemed to have once.
tj: the operative word here is "seemed to have." I don't believe he ever had "significant substance," otherwise he would never have been selected as the cardboard man of the corporate duopoly. The change is not something our celebrity president "lost" but something that more people are finally begin to realize.
Michael Jackson was a great performer. He deserved a respectful memorial tribute. But is there no other NEWS? What has happened to coverage of the carnage in Iraq, in Afghanistan? News is becoming entertainment that sells more products.
Shach, you make a good point. Michael Jackson was indeed a good man, but as usual the media goes overboard. I appreciate that you can criticize the media coverage without maliciously attacking Jackson.
Michael Jackson was a great performer. He deserved a respectful memorial tribute. But is there no other NEWS? What has happened to coverage of the carnage in Iraq, in Afghanistan? News is becoming entertainment that sells more products.
Michael Jackson was a great performer. He deserved a respectful memorial tribute. But is there no other NEWS? What has happened to coverage of the carnage in Iraq, in Afghanistan? News is becoming entertainment that sells more products.
been waiting for someone to write an update of ginsberg's 'howl' to fit the current popular culture... if this included more of the heart and heartbreak of the human being who died and was written in verse, it could be exactly that, but then it would wind up either in the next issue of 'people' or become 'art' and, hence, entertainment. and lord knows we have been entertained enough. keep howling, chris. it's a big wilderness.
This is the first and hopefully last time I will disagree with Chris.
Leave Michael Jackson alone. This is the wrong time, as Spike Lee very plainly put it, to be talking smack about someone who was destroyed by the same fundie racists who destroyed innocent lives over their false allegations that kids were being sodomized at McMartin preschool.
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYdsJQlvhhM
Michael gave $300 million during his lifetime and left 20% of his estate to charity.
And one more important fact, he did most CERTAINLY NOT try to make himself more White but suffered from socially unacceptable vitiligo (in addition to lupus). Some White people really need to get over yourselves and stop blindly following the media's lead instead of looking for the facts. Michael's white glove wasn't about a fad he was starting, it was about covering a horrible white patch of vitilago on his hand. If you look closely at the thriller videos, he made his skin darker than it used to be to try to cover it up. With all the sweating from dancing, it started melting off during the video and his ears are twice as dark as his face since the ears don't sweat.
This man was terribly HURT in life by the same sort of nonesense in Chris' article. He's dead now. Will you please have the decency to live him alone?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_s0e2YPTHIU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMGcJFCmnCg
After years of trying to cover the white patches with black make-up, he finally went for depigmentation, which is what any of those "freaks" who can afford it, choose to do.
Other than this Chris, I love your stuff but now is not the time to be talking smack about Michael.
I don't buy this disease theory, it doesn't make sense. The white by choice skin bleaching theory is more consistent with his body dysmorphic disorder that's the disease he had.
Hi William of Dallas
Did you watch the videos all the way through? Take a look at these pictures please:
http://floacist.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/vitiligo-photos-michael-jackson/
http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i279/marnifrances/Michael%20Jackson/Vitiligo5.jpg
http://floacist.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/175.jpg
http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/1244/tri114db66bud8.jpg
I am a Black woman who has relatives with vitiligo; it's not a pleasant disease. My aunt went for the depigmentation and then got a nose job because she looked like an "albino cockroach" with her frizzy hair and negroid nose. My other aunt painstakingly applies make-up everyday and just reached the point, like Michael was, where she can't be in the sun. Having to totally shield yourself from the sun with hats and umbrellas and wearing long sleeves and pants, as Michael had to do, is also caused by the disease.
If you want to get technical, he had Universal Vitiligo or Vitiligo totalis which brings about a complete or nearly complete loss of skin pigment. The pigment is usually lost from entire body surface except a few small islands of normally pigmented skin. Permanent medical depigmentation is usually the only option.
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/49/022bj1.jpg
Are you a doctor? Are you his doctor? Based on what authority or knowledge do you just get to decide what was more consistent with the thinness he had from his earliest days without even doing any research into his case? This kind of determination that he had to be a freak hurt Michael immensely. May he rest in peace away from all this nonesense.
From Taraborrelli's biography:
==========================
Meanwhile, Lisa was realising that her mission to save Michael was not going to be easy. She was amazed by his emotional repression and felt he was resisting her efforts to help. Perhaps, she pondered, he rather enjoyed wallowing in his own pain, playing the victim.
He was 'like a young boy, angry at the world', one of her friends noted, and his self-pity became a strain on the relationship.
'She had no patience at all with the lost childhood routine. "Who hasn't had a miserable childhood?" she would say.'
His moods and habits became infuriating. She clocked up the hours her husband spent in the bathroom, applying and removing cosmetics.
Throughout their marriage, she never saw him without his make-up. When they slept together, in the morning she'd find his pillow smeared with it.
'Lisa would try to surprise him by waking early and tapping him on the shoulder,' a friend recalled.
'He would shriek "No, don't look!" and scamper to the bathroom.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1196395/Lisa-Marie-Presley-said-passionate-lover-So-WAS-trut...
===============================
"There was nothing strange about your daddy. It was strange what your daddy had to deal with but he dealt with it." -- Al Sharpton, telling it like it is. Again.
Sorry for truncating the link for the bio quotes. Here is the correct link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1196395/Lisa-Marie-Presley-said-passionate-lover-So-WAS-trut...
Thank you Catherina. I couldn't have said it better myself. Thanks for also providing the links to prove the biggest living hell MJ was forced to go through. Our nation is drowning in misery and yet even in these times, our cornfed electorate seems to have the time to fall into the media trap on MJ. In a society where the Mammon is worshipped, a genuine philanthropist is persecuted while a phoney swindler company pretending to be generous is rewarded !
You're welcome Jennifer. It's getting to the point where I feel an organized webpage may be in order.
I agree with Jennifer, thank you Catherina. :)
You're welcome :) Thanks for the solidarity.
gosh I love the way Chris Hedges writes!
Well done Chris on applying your gamma knife insight to dissect what most of us just gape and gawk at as spectators of our own bizarre existence.
i do not watch television so i avoided the endless coverage... but "everyone" is talking about it, and even at CD there have now been several pieces about the meanings of MJ's death and life.
This is the best writing by far that i have seen. Placing this specific iconic celebrity life in the context of our overall cultural dis-ease...
As with everything, the question is, how do we live? How do we grow a culture not steeped in commodified "entertainment" and celebrified "reality"...?
It's all pretty much been said in the comment areas of Common Dreams. For one thing, i do not watch television... my friends and i are farming in the city... but the grand civilizational train wreck continues apace...
If not Michael Jackson, the corporate media will find someone to distract the electorate with to watch. I saw Michael Jackson's biography and to the best of my knowledge Michael Jackson never cared about money when he grew up. All he cared to do was dance and be proud of his talent. The MJ bashers will never learn that. Like the rest of us, he's only human. It's just that the media and the public expected way too much out of him that just like FDR, he collapsed unexpectedly.
Chris Hedges also brings up a valuable point on media distractions. Our cornfed electorate has so much time on their shoulders to watch, obsess, and engage in frivolous discussions about celebrities that have no impact on their personal lives and yet they can't find the time to research their pols on the local, state, and federal levels who have a profound impact on our lives. Better to persecute MJ despite his being proven innocent than it is to take on our slick pols in Washington afflicting us daily isn't it? Either we the electorate will leave MJ alone, learn our lessons, and stop finding another celebrity to obsess about or we will never learn and our country will go the way of Michael Jackson sooner or later.
PS: Notice that even on the blogosphere, if the topic is Michael Jackson or Sarah Palin, hundreds of comments to flood the site. Anyone want to bet that this article will not generate the most number of comments today or even this week?
Yes, and what kind of popularity does that remind you of?
Um, I don't know. I mean I loved MJ for his talent and all but oh I don't know. I just keep having this feeling that we the electorate are having more painfully economic times and poor recognition around the globe for our wars and trade policies coming up.
P.S.:
What Sotomayor Could Mean for Network Neutrality and the First Amendment
by Marvin Ammori
It's on this site and this is serious.
The man in the mirror indeed! Jackson was no more and no less than any of us. A spirit upon this earth and the good he did and the good he was is in no way diminished by the bad seen by those caught up in the illusion of the mirror. You either see the illusion or you see the truth. Chris sees Micheal through his own eyes, and his own beliefs of humanity.
Of all the people we imagine could lead us to better days, Micheal may be one of the least imagined in this role, but he may be the true savior type of our day if we just stop looking in the mirror and look within instead. There is no shame in being who we are, no shame in how the journey of humanity has shaped us in our minds, and in reflection shaped us in the mirror, because we can re-shape our vision on a whim and a fancy. Our surgeons blade for such reshaping will nip and tuck and clear the way for the change we need to make the world a better place. And nip and tuck our beliefs we must and become the least just like Micheal, we will. But unlike the process of trying to fit the body to the illusion, fitting the illusion to the truth of the great spirit brings nothing but joy and perfection.
If Micheal was the sacrificial lamb to our material culture as Chris hints, a prisoner of the illusion in the hallway of mirrors, the amusement park of entertainment, then his day of return in spirit is near and perhaps upon us and his final escape may herald ours.
This has to be the best explanation I've ever seen of the close ties between the worship of Celebrities and the worship of money (and the Corporations that control most of it) in the now failing US society. This is a very, very important essay.
Obama has a high "celebrity index score," which would seem to go far in explaining why he is failing. His wife has become a total celebrity. Celebrities can sing, dance, and make nice speeches, but don't expect them to be able to substantially improve economies and societies.
This essay is telling progressives in detail why they have been basically shut out of the US system, whereas by contrast they get at least some traction in Europe, Canada, and so forth. Progressives are always among the first to be voted off of the hell hole of an island known as the US.
Are and victimhood the only game for progressives? How hopeless!
I can really relate to what Integritymattersmost wrote and others here on CD's. I also have had trouble explaining to people what's wrong with celebrity culture, so therefore it is refreshing to have Chris Hedges help us all in clarifying our deep felt sentiments.
Too many people embrace corporate created culture at a terrible price unaware that by feeding into the mindset, we become subservient to it. Rather than enriching our lives through "Education, building community, honesty, transparency and sharing" as Chris hedges puts it, we devolve into an insecure, angry, disillusioned flock of sheep who think that happiness is approval from people we don't know or care about. We're more likely to vote for American Idol finalists than politicians. We waste years glued to corporate sporting events, reality TV shows or video games unaware that we are serving our corporate masters faithfully in the process. And we bleat out corporate fed sound bites to defend our distorted way of life. "We must protect our freedoms from those who want to take it away from us" or "They hate our freedom" or "America is the best place to live in the entire world. God Bless America! (...and to hell with all the rest?)". Convenient answers for whom?
Mr Hedges writes: "We have learned ways of speaking and thinking that grossly disfigure the way we relate to the world and those around us. Neal Gabler, who has written wisely about this, argues that celebrity culture is not a convergence of consumer culture and religion so much as a hostile takeover of religion by consumer culture."
I would argue that it is not a hostile takeover of religion but a natural extension of it. Purveyors of religion have always practiced the selling of animals to sacrifice, the bones of saints, splinters of the cross and other questionable relics to gain heavenly influence. They have praised the unnatural lifestyles of Saints and priests (to the point of giving them a legal pass), and they have elevated the Pope to popemobile status.
Mr. Hedges concludes: "The fantasy of celebrity culture is not designed simply to entertain. It is designed to drain us emotionally, confuse us about our identity, make us blame ourselves for our predicament, condition us to chase illusions of fame and happiness and keep us from fighting back"
If you substitute the words "eternal life" or perhaps more to the point, "messianic redemption" for "celebrity culture" in that sentence you have a perfect description of mainstream religion for the past 2000 years. I am thinking of those individuals who are emotionally drained through the spectacle of faith healing and speaking in tongues. I am thinking of those individuals confused about being homosexuals (especially priests), I am thinking of all the guilt and shame we are expected to accept ("original sin") even as children simply for being born, for being human, for eating the apple. I am thinking of those chasing the illusion of eternal life in heaven while they destroy life here on earth, believing that any bad act will be forgiven when they are "born again". I am thinking of the slaves in the fields singing gospel songs as they worked themselves to death, waiting for the imaginary rewards of heaven instead of fighting for their rights.
I think Mr. Hedges could use a little look in the mirror to see how the religious culture he espouses contributes to the celebrity culture he abhors.
What a great post! Thanks. I think the thing so many miss, Hedges included, is just how much religion is part and parcel of Western culture and mindset. It's so prevalent we almost don't notice it and don't realize things could have been otherwise. (What if the apostles as a group were worshipped, AS A GROUP? What if Mary Magdelene was considered Jesus' chief apostle? What if because of these things Western civilization valued teamwork, and women, instead of a lone suffering saviour?)
Religion and it's tendencies may in fact be part of our brain construct. The very best part that unless utilized through some spiritual practice, sits dormant.
Religion was a vehicle in times past as catalyst for unique visions, all forms of religion served to bring forward and maintain within our newly developing mental processes a more enlightened and holistic living experience.
Now our old and or ancient religious practices appear more and more outdated to the cause. But all over the world a new spirituality is on the rise. One that fits our time and our current needs.
The idea that it is the "lone suffering saviour" that seems to be more valuable than teamwork, or women, is an idea that was promoted and practiced by priests, popes and kings only to maintain their single handed ego power trip over the masses.
But that was merely a manipulation of the meaning of the Christ, just as Micheal's image was manipulated to sell, there is in fact a great parallel between the two. The question that is raised is; Which image will you choose to believe of Christ, Micheal or yourself for that matter?
"The Cult of Self" Hedges should write his next article on Twitter, which for the most part appears to be a place where self important people think the people around them really care that they just walked into a mall, or just stepped in dog poop...
Michael Jackson was a sick man, and who else, in his shoes, wouldn't be. He was exploited from the age of five.
A lot of people assume that Jackson is a pedophile and yet never read the case files and/or evidence against him.
I believe Jackson had a messianic complex. He thought he could bring strange children, often very sick or with cancer, and allow them to sleep in his bed, and so on and so forth. He may have been deluded or a fool, but I'm not so sure he was a pedophile.
And his daughter, Paris, was not prodded to speak at that memorial. If you watch the tape, she asked to speak, and then her family let her and adjusted the mike. He couldn't have been all bad for her to breakdown like that...
It might also be noted that Jackson donated over 50 million dollars to charity (plus 20% of his estate) and dedicated hundreds of hours to visiting the sick and disadvantaged (has Mr Hedges done that?)
A lot of what Hedges said is correct about our society, but lets give Jackson a break. RIP.
I agree. Hedges article is about our society. MJ himself seemed about as "normal" as one would expect given his circumstance. And the fact that MJ didn't fit the norm, well we know how THAT sits with corporate america, as well as Right wingers. If his pedophile case came up sometime in the last couple years, we'd all suspect that it was some right-wing "pro-family" Repubs at work behind the scenes.
Clearly far too much has been said about Michael Jackson thus far. It has in times past been customary not to delve into the lurid details of a person's life upon their decease. So in theory I agree mostly with the idea that the corporate culture of marketing and entertainment is attempting to hijack (rather successfully) the emotional credence of public display and the mores of ceremony to suit their objectivistic aims of normative subjective assessment. In doing this I find their tawdry and (yes, thank you!) maudlin display horribly disconcerting in its refractory and divergent conclusions, affects, musings, etc.
I will say this that many of the man's songs were very catchy. I can't claim that this personal opinion and possibly musical fact have made any major impressions upon me or my life, and can easily appreciate the man from a distance for small periods of time without any commitment whatsoever to any of this indulgent charade.
Chris Hedges, our BEST writer.
"Resist or become serfs." By resist, I don't think he meant vote smart. I think he, Chris Hedges, meant resist. Fight the system. And not as part of it, which voting is.....
(Who the heck IS Michael Jackson anyway? Sounds like some child-molestor who died decades ago, guess I need a tv to keep up dammit.)
Jerry D Rose, Nice Post.
Who the heck is Michael Jackso9n anyway? I think he must have been some kind of pretty good song and dance man who recorded a couple of pretty good record albums, from what I can gather. Or, maybe he was some kind of god. Who knows? Apparently he was someone nearly indispensible, as his death was covered 24/7 and wall to wall for nearly two weeks to the exclusion of almost all other news on television.
EKATON, what is "television," is it some form of mind control that beams propaganda into peoples living rooms? Freaky.
I get most of my info from
Common Dreams
Asiatimes.com, excellent, in depth Central Asia coverage.
Informed Comment
antiwar.com
DAWN.com
The NYT's to know what lies are being told,
And mostly GOOGLE for RESEARCHING what the above sources state.
I never heard anything about this celebrity death, but things are smoking hot in South Waziristan, Mosul, Palestine, and DC.
But I gotta try having beams aimed at my head, then I'll be more up on Michael Jackson's tripe. i'm poor, but i'm a 30 yr piano player, 15 yr guitar player, I've paid my dues and earned the right to laugh at that non-musician child molester pos's projected illusions.
EKATON, I read your post and hear a nice person on the other end, respectfully, crazyjoe.
i'm gonna go do a reality show. life.
I am trying really hard to summon from within whatever it is going to take to cancel my cable TV subscription. It really is as bad as a drug. I'd still use it to play DVD's or maybe as a giant computer monitor. All it does is spew useless information while, yes, as you said, beam radiation and propaganda into one's head. Thank's for your comment near the end, and I'll say the same to you.
Kent Shaw (aka ekaton)
Then turn the channel.
"It's terrible to be a 'thing'."
- Marilyn Monroe
Mirror world is an image that frequently hits home. Unfortunately it is not a single static glass pane, but a refractory dynamic. All advertising advertises advertising as McCluhan noted - also that the point is to be aware of the dynamic and articulate its essence before it completes itself.
I recall being told by a sibling in the marketing industry of the designs for embedded advertising in film and on TV in the 80s. The ads were already known to be dropping in effectiveness. Remember the Nielson ratings? Get a black box and participate in viewer surveys?
We are subjected to highly researched 'fetishization' of virtually everything. Gotta have whats "hot" to be "cool". Remember the way that anything that is not of the system is defined in terms of difference rather than similarity.
The staging of éntertainment'(etymologically also means entrainment) - a can of soda on a table in a scene, any vehicle, window treatments, floor covering, clothing styles, ad nauseum... but most specifically the mode of interaction, life focus and choices - taadaa... 'reality shows'.
I'm working in a garden this summer and finding some 'volunteers' from last year providing unexpected variety, a bee hive (honey! out of this world - have you ever seen the process of bees swarming in preparation for a portion of them to go colonize elsewhere? amazing!)and planting of beneficial plants for polinating insects. The intricacy and beauty of this tiny corner of nature, the umatchable symmetries from the nature of a leaf or flower, lunching on sugar snap peas, discovering edible 'weeds', its like walking into a living encyclopedia and when other humans and animals are there it becomes even more multidimensional - and entertaining.
"The intricacy and beauty of this tiny corner of nature, the unmatchable symmetries from the nature of a leaf or flower, lunching on sugar snap peas, discovering edible 'weeds', its like walking into a living encyclopedia and when other humans and animals are there it becomes even more multidimensional - and entertaining."
This is one of the most terrible things about this culture of celebrity and triviality and "entertainment" - so many of us lose the ability to even see the world we inhabit, we become bored and depressed while surrounded by wonders that we do not recognize...
As Nero fiddles...rock on Chris Hedges! Bravo e grazie!
I have read most of Chris Hedges books and have looked forward to Monday’s comment by Chris Hedges on this web site, but he has made a serious error in reporting Michael Jackson a ‘pedophile’.
He was never convicted of such a crime and the ‘out of court settlements’ leave little proof that he acted unlawfully. In this nation we are ‘innocent until proven guilty’.
What kind of parent whose son was a victim of such a crime who would settle for money and the obligation to be quiet rather than prosecute such wrong behavior under law?
Yes, Michael Jackson was a different kind of person than most, but that is not a crime. We are supposed to be a Nation that believes in the ‘Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness’.
Much of the article I agree, but this point I bring up is a serious error.
sidecross