Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The One Percent Scrambles to Maintain Profits – and Order
“The next few months will be crucial for avoiding a dramatic downturn in employment and a further significant aggravation of social unrest.”
That’s is the first sentence in a report released this week by the International Labor Organization studying the effects of the economic crisis and its impact on global labor markets. On the one hand, it sounds like common sense: as working and poor people see their livelihoods wracked by joblessness and social cuts while the rich enjoy lavish wealth, low taxes and increased profits, popular anger begins to boil over.
photo: Sam Wolff
But sometimes it takes an agency of the United Nations to spell out logic that is more elusive for the ruling one percent – that class of CEOs and policymakers which persists on cutting costs and expanding profits while sitting on mountains of capital.
As a share of GDP, corporate profits in the U.S. are at their highest levels since 1950. Last week the Congressional Budget Office reported that between 1979 and 2007 the income for the top 1 percent rose 275 percent while income for the bottom 20 percent rose only 18 percent. And that data, which predates the record unemployment, home foreclosures and rising poverty brought on by the Great Recession, dramatically understates where economic inequality stands today. At the same time, a report this week revealed that 30 of some of the largest corporations in the country paid no income taxes between 2008 and 2010.
The extreme class disparities in the U.S. are rooted in the outright theft of the poor by the rich, an exploitative relationship written into the DNA of capitalism. But the situation has left many to wonder if the U.S. is on the path to becoming a “third-world” nation.
Under the dictates of international financial institutions, decades of debt and austerity imposed on poor countries in the Global South produced widespread social unrest in the form of civil wars and other conflicts throughout Latin American, Africa and Asia. Today, policies that were so economically unjust that they needed to be forcibly implemented by autocratic regimes are being introduced in the North.
The financial crisis of 2008 has led to a merciless reign of austerity that is being forced on workers and the poor in Europe and North America. Decades of stagnant wages and falling living standards have been compounded by the costs of a crisis that the one percent dumped onto the 99 percent, who are now fighting back like never before.
Lit from the dried tinder of class anger piled up in the world’s financial capital, the Occupy Wall Street movement has spread like a prairie fire, engulfing hundreds of cities and towns across the U.S. and beyond. In Manhattan, Boston, Chicago, Oakland, Atlanta and elsewhere, authorities have only fanned the flames in their attempts to crack down on the movement.
But weeks of evictions, mass arrests and police brutality meted out against protesters came to a head in Oakland last week where plumes of tear gas, stun grenades and other projectiles produced chaos and left one Iraq War veteran, Scott Olsen, in critical condition. The ensuing outrage in turn sparked calls for a general strike, organized on short notice and supported by local unions throughout the Bay Area. On Wednesday thousands marched on the Port of Oakland, effectively shutting down the fifth busiest port in the country. A banner that hung outside City Hall read “Occupy Everything. Death to Capitalism.”
Scenes like these seem less remarkable nowadays in cities like Athens, where general strikes and riots against harsh austerity have shaken the Greek government close to the point of total collapse. A debt crisis in Greece that can also be traced back to Wall Street has plunged the eurozone into a financial maelstrom. The attendant onslaught of painful austerity measures in Europe has led to a surge of class struggle – or what the ILO more academically refers to as “social unrest.”
Youth unemployment has been one of the major factors behind class anger and its expression in the streets. In Spain, a stunning 48 percent of young people are jobless. This summer Spain became a focal point of struggle with the movement of the “Indignados” who occupied public squares in Madrid and other cities.
In turbulent Greece, where youth unemployment officially stands at 43 percent, general strikes, marches and riots have been an ongoing reality in a country where punishing austerity is being pushed by the European Central Bank in order to rescue the Greek economy from bankruptcy. Greece’s sovereign debt crisis has for weeks left Europe teetering on the precipice of a full-blown financial meltdown.
The latest bailout deal, which includes more cuts and promises to exacerbate unemployment, is being pushed hard by Germany, France and the U.S. as President Obama and European leaders met this week for the G20 summit. Meanwhile, the turmoil in Greece has Prime Minister Papandreou’s government hanging on by a thread.
Youth unemployment and discrimination of marginalized groups were also the fuel behind huge riots that rocked London and other parts of the U.K. this summer.
In the U.S., unemployment and low wages is compounded by soaring student debt, which averaged $25,250 for recent graduates in 2010. Young people in the U.S. have been moved to fight back in various ways over the past year, joining the labor movement’s fight against union-busting legislation in Wisconsin last winter, organizing flash mob actions targeting tax-dodging corporations, and now occupying parks and squares all over the country.
But workers and the poor of all ages have been drawn into the Occupy struggle. The new movement against corporate greed and economic inequality has been strengthened by the involvement of organized labor, which has successfully thwarted police evictions of Occupy encampments in New York and San Francisco as unions called on rank-and-file members to defend the occupations. This fact alone is eloquent testimony for why the Occupy movement needs labor at its side.
Likewise, the Occupy movement has reinvigorated the labor movement. Not only has the movement’s rhetoric about the 99 percent entered the lexicon of labor leaders, but Occupy activists have bolstered labor struggles as well, including the fight among locked out art handlers in New York and thousands of Verizon workers still fighting for a fair contract.
There are fears among some Occupy activists about the danger of being co-opted by labor and its dead-end electoral allegiance to the Democratic Party. But so far, labor leaders appear to recognize that unions need the Occupy movement as much as the Occupy movement needs labor. That alliance would be shattered if labor officials were to push an electoral agenda within the movement because most occupiers have come to reject – or at least become extremely suspicious of – both of the ruling political parties in this country.
Now, with the general strike in Oakland this week, workplace action has been added to the arsenal of the 99 percent in this new struggle. And, as the Occupy movement plans for colder weather, there are serious discussions happening about possibly taking over vacant buildings and foreclosed homes.
This week, as Bank of America backed off from plans to charge a hugely unpopular $5 debit card fee, there were signs that the ruling one percent is beginning to understand some of the reasoning behind the ILO’s observations about social unrest.
There is a profound sentiment beginning to pulse through the veins of working-class consciousness. It’s a sense that not only have we paid enough for a crisis produced by the rich and their spokespersons in Washington, but it’s time for us to take back what has been stolen from us.
After decades of unbridled class warfare against the 99 percent, soaring profits and relative calm in the streets, workers and the poor are saying something to the one percent: you can’t have it all.
- Posted in


36 Comments so far
Show AllThe 1% believe they certainly can have it all. Whose going to stop them? Do we seriously believe a raggedy ass bunch of homeless people drug addicts and agents provocateurs are going overthrow the greatest Empire the world has ever seen? LOL! People who are saying just showing up and changing the medias focus for a mos. is changing shit are deluding themselves. While Occupy made noises, marched around and shit in buckets Obama and his GOP pals passed 3 more NAFTA style free trade agreements that will off shore millions of more of our jobs. While Occupy played human mic games like it mattered and all you in here cheered and made like they were storming the Winter Palace the rest of the world's fascist leadership was passing endless austerity measures to take away our social safety nets here and in Europe. In other words who are we fooling, but ourselves? This noisy so called Rebellion is nonsense and is doing zip. We need an organized opposition that means business not some street party with bongo drummers and flowers for the police. The Police work for the 1% never forget it. Let's get serious you don't fight a class war with this kind of nonsense. Winter will end this and the sooner the better because ,frankly its starting to look foolish.
I agree. The violence has already begun to hurt and I believe at this point you are exactly correct in saying (at the risk of being called Troll, Traitor, Right Winger, Etc),
"This noisy so called Rebellion is nonsense and is doing zip. We need an organized opposition that means business not some street party with bongo drummers and flowers for the police. The Police work for the 1% never forget it. Let's get serious you don't fight a class war with this kind of nonsense. Winter will end this and the sooner the better because ,frankly its starting to look foolish."
Heightened awareness and participatory involvement isn't exactly nothing. But you're right about the ultimate need for some better organized and coordinated activity, if only for purposes of controlling the counterproductive violence that frustrations almost inevitably tend to produce at some point.
"RV"
"Seaglass" and "lefthome" are not helping matters. Being derogatory and making demands that the Occupy participants be better organized and look less "foolish" only shows how little they are willing to do.
Let's look at some facts.
The city of Oakland has a population near 390,000. The estimates I've seen of the number of participants in the TOTALLY JUSTIFIABLE protests have been around 5,000 people.
This means that while less than 1.5% of the population of Oakland are out in the streets protesting the blatant corruption of this empire, "Seaglass" and "lefthome" would rather criticize the protestors than the 98.5% of Oakland's residents who are not.
These numbers are shameful and the only people who need to be criticized as "homeless" or "drug addicts" are the majority of the 98.5% who are too addicted to the status quo to get off of their lazy asses and stand up to the corporate criminals who will render us all "homeless".
I realize that there are some troublemakers whenever you get ANY group of people together and I realize that some people don't understand what all of the fuss is about, but less than 1.5% of the population of Oakland cannot be blamed for the apathy of the majority.
So, when someone says that there needs to be better organizing, I would ask, "How are YOU going to get the majority off of their asses?"
Exactly. First things first. Ideally things will utimately come together so that any overly aggressive tendencies are either thwarted or more constructively applied. But the main consideration at this point is to keep building the movement.
Five thousand protesters in Oakland, Birdbrain? The sources that are telling you that are the sources you need to stop trusting. Have a look:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sk9rZxCVff0&feature=share
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/319628_251177891598157_217355668313713_665459_1900078090_n.jpg
Lowballing the numbers that much is one of the tactics they're using to minimize the impact of OWS. It's not working, not from where I'm standing. In Oakland, people are off of their asses.
"abstractedaway"
I would be delighted if the estimates I've heard are wrong and there was a much larger turnout.
You miss my main point. I was responding to the criticism of the Occupy-ers as being disorganized, drug addicts and homeless people. This criticism is unwarranted and harmful.
In looking at a variety of videos, I still doubt that there were more participants than possibly 2 to 3 percent of Oakland's population. I wish I could believe otherwise.
The reports of 100,000 participants that are circulating on the internet are not supported by the videos.
"Let's get serious you don't fight a class war with this kind of nonsense. Winter will end this and the sooner the better because ,frankly its starting to look foolish."
A revolution has to start somewhere. This is how it started in Egypt (where it is still incomplete). As for winter, it has arrived in the Bay Area, and OWS is getting stronger here.
How would you "begin", if not this way? What is your "organized opposition", some new political party, selling itself out to its campaign contributors? Or do you want something like FARC in Columbia, which would be hunted down like dogs in the street in this country, while losing its public support, just as the Weather Underground was? I saw all that in the 1970's ...
"How would you "begin", if not this way?" For one I'd ditch the human mic and get better organized. Not having leaders is fooling nobody. The PTB are already actively infiltrating this leaderless movement with its tried and true anti-insurgency methods and do any of you honestly believe they won't smash this up long before it achieves squat? Camping out in parks was a cute gimmick but its limitations are obvious. For one thing read Sun Tzu. You don't try and directly confront a vastly superior enemy when your a weak and unorganized force. Oh and as far as changing the topic from debt and Dancing with the Stars , yea they've managed to do that for some weeks , but the media has already lost interest and the pols will follow.
Sun Tzu said: "...attaining one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the pinnacle of excellence. Subjugating the enemy's army without fighting is the true pinnacle of excellence."
We should recognize that this is what has been done to the 99% by the 1%, that despite having vastly superior numbers we have been done in by a small committed and well organized group. We should respect and under no circumstance underestimate the skill needed to accomplish such a feat. Such lessons are hard and bitter things but recognizing the truth will allow one to learn from them. The 99% are a vastly superior force but at the moment they are wandering around without much of a clue engaging in intermural skirmishes. What they need is a call to arms and that is exactly what the protests are providing. Nader was right to say that they should change up the tactics though, calls to arms by their nature must be attention grabbers.
Yes, we need an organized opposition to the 1% and the occupy people are correct to not want to be a part of the Democratic party. This movement recognizes that the two corporate parties are one and the same in their work to increase the profits of the 1% who give them generous 'contributions' (bribes!) We must face the fact that our government has been purchased by the 1%. The first step for all American voters needs to be a rejection of the total Congress. We must vote NO on all incumbents. The little D or R after their name is meaningless. There is no lesser evil. They are both evil and working together to screw the working people of this nation.
"Obama and his GOP pals passed 3 more NAFTA style free trade agreements that will off shore millions of more of our jobs."
It will be interesting to see how the free trade agreements will work here in the U.S. when all the ports are closed down permanently.
It would seem that our former jobs are being exported to third world countries and given to people who will gladly work for peanuts as compared to what the soon to be late great middle class of western democracies expected/expects in return for labor.
So how do we in the middle class join 2/3rds of the world's human population in solidarity when most of the world is accustomed to living at subsistance levels for very few dollars a day?
My utopian ideal would be a radical re-organization of human society where the wealthy class is eliminated and human relationships are valued over material acquisition.
I've never been much interested in accumulating personal wealth. It's boring to say the least. The rich are deluded and deluded people are never any fun accept possibly to watch in their pathetic foolishness. But resisting and revolting against oppression, which is necessarily engendered by concentrated wealth and power, is great fun and can contribute to a satisfying life.
"The rich are deluded and deluded people are never any fun accept possibly to watch in their pathetic foolishness."
By and large, yes. Amazing how seldom that's appreciated. There may be a very small number who have real, defensible goals, but they're hard to find indeed. Something about camels and the eye of a needle ...
I've worked directly for the wealthy, cleaning their multi-million dollar yachts. This afforded me the opportunity to observe two specific things about them. First, trickle down is bullshit. Three years cleaning 2,3, 6 million dollars yachts...nit picking every little detail, scrubbing non-skid on my hands & knees, washing their boat outdoors in early November in Michigan so it's clean for the trip to Florida...and I received less than $200 in tips. Second, money is the core of their lives. They talk about it incessantly. How much this boat maintenance costs, who over-charged them for repairing their BMW, how much their last vacation cost, how much the fuel bill was for the summertime Great Lakes Loop trip, etc.
It always amused me that while I stood around the outside bar where they gathered and talked with them that they were complaining to a guy who doesn't own his own house, much less a second or third home. One distinct episode involved a customer who sat and complained for five minutes about a $40,000 fuel bill to take his boat back to Chicago from Florida and how it made his second home harder to afford for the year. I smiled and nodded, and fought back the urge to spit in his eye. Oh well, it is what it is. Just some perspective from a lowly laborer whose stood in the rarified air of Gods.
You are wrong if you think this movement is not doing anything. The thing that is needed right now is to reach the rest of the 99% who, not being unemployed or students generally don't have many minutes to themselves to contemplate where all of this is heading. These folks must be reached and some sort of consensus must be hammered out among all of us. If we are all on the same page, it's game over for the 1%, no fuss, no muss, no bloodshed, just a straight-forward simple fact.
I was convinced during the 2008 election that the whole big send-up for Obama was due to the rich realizing that they were not going to keep going, the end was coming and that they wanted a sort of structured settlement allowing them to keep all of the stuff. Since that time I have come to realize that they also wanted an even bigger share of the pie, unbelievably enough!
We the 99% need to all be on the same page and THAT is what this is about.
I agree completely that one of the major needs of the movement right now is to reach out to and inform the rest of the 99%. I suggest that a strong communications arm be set up to gather facts and produce leaflets. I think this should be the major focus as the winter weather approaches: education. And I think leaflet drops at shopping malls and street corners is the way to go, along with websites that people can consult on their own time.
I think the second major need right now, as winter approaches and the movement risks breaking up, is to reach out globally to the other Occupy movements. Are there collective actions that can be organized on behalf of the Greek people or the Syrian people? One of the potential strengths of this movement is its potential international character. Let's take advantage of the technology that exists to communicate and co-ordinate across political and geographic borders!
We are kind of in the belly of the beast here and have quite enough of a mess to be cleaning up without worrying about telling other people what to do. While it is good to offer moral support to other efforts we'll be doing the rest of the world a huge favor if we just clean up our own act right now. It does no good to take the focus off of Wall Street so these characters can slither back into obscurity.
Generating leaflets costs money and doesn't really grab the attention of the average time pressed working person. It's too much like religious zealots visiting your door on a Saturday morning when you've got oodles of stuff to do. No, I'm a single working mother and I do understand this. While educational material is good, websites are great for that, they are cheap and people can visit them anytime.
This needs to be treated like a political campaign, a campaign that has little cash but lots of good ideas. Earned press is the way to go here. I could see setting up a press liaison and an opposition research branch (which will look for opportunities to exploit for aforesaid earned press).
Of course leaflets cost money, but in this computer age, how much really? These would be one way for the person at home who wants to contribute to the movement to do their small part, in their own home town. And I bet distributing leaflets would also generate some free media coverage. At the very least, they could be used to publicize a website or two. I bet some people would WELCOME more information.
And as far as having enough to do here in the "belly of the beast," I really do not think reaching out is an either/or proposition. I think we would be wasting one of the movement's great potential strengths were we not to use currently available technology to create a truly global movement. We need to take advantage of our strength in numbers. You said so yourself! Together, we might achieve much.
Well certainly there is a big job that needs to be done, and as many ways to reach people as there are people. To avoid lawsuits and misunderstandings the central group should OK any message that goes out. Personally I think well orchestrated "object lessons" and resulting free press are the way to go. If you draw media attention to an opponent's weakness and outwit that opponent in the process, well, a picture is worth a thousand words, as they say ;-)
You cannot stop unemployment from rising till you repair the systemic damage done to the financial system by Clinton, Bush and Obama. And until you repair it, stop the uncontrolled spending, stop increasing debt to provide "goodies" for your "bud's" pockets, you'll not stop social unrest.
Fair taxes, fair government, a fair and equitable shot at education, jobs and income is not a lot to ask. As the man say's "saying something to the one percent: you can't have it all."
Because of the Occupy movement, working people are now talking about class warfare for the first time since the 1930's. The capitalist media have tried to lay the blame for the crisis on 'working class profligacy' and social safety net spending, but the Occupy movement has been able to shift that blame onto the banksters and others of the capitalist class who are actually responsible for the crisis. SEAGLASS and LeftHome are wrong.
"...the Occupy movement has been able to shift that blame onto the banksters and others of the capitalist class who are actually responsible for the crisis. SEAGLASS and LeftHome are wrong."
You are right.
They are wrong.
In any movement you will find radicals and nuts for lack of a better word.
The riech has their tea baggers. They seem to get by just fine.
Pressure from below and pressure from above is what has historically worked and today is no different.
"But the situation has left many to wonder if the U.S. is on the path to becoming a “third-world” nation."
.....Not only are we on the path, we are moving at warp-speed. We only need to look at the retail shopping malls and other businesses closing their doors; the majority of recent college graduates finding nothing but low wage jobs with tuition debt up to their eyeballs; and most recently, thousands upon thousands of bank employees getting the boot so their greedy CEOs and shareholders can reap all the benefits.
......Welcome to the Third World!
Third World countries have no industry of their own, they provide resources for other countries and we are well on our way there. Amazingly enough, I've had to start checking the country of origin in my grocery store to make sure I was buying products grown here and not in China. We are the bread basket of the world, what on EARTH is up with that?!
It happenned in the 80s when family farms were closed in order to make farming a "big business" for the bankers. Consolidation of banking is going to lead to more smaller farms going out of business. Banks aren't going to lend to small domestically owned farms when they can invest in multinational syndicates and corporate owned farms. And farms rely on credit.
Sad but true. I have hope for the "local" movement which seems to be gaining some traction. My own plans for retirement are to grab some acreage and to set up a bio-diverse organic farm. They are not currently self-sustaining sorts of things at all, hopefully that will change.
In all likelihood, that bread basket is made in China. Welcome to the realization of the neoliberal dream.
The guy who opened up China and who ended the international gold standard ushering in the age of the floating currency was none other than Richard Nixon who I doubt you would class as a neoliberal. Certainly there have been American job killing offenses on both sides of the aisle, that's kind of the problem. We have no real representation in either party. What you are seeing in the OWS movement is America's OH SH*T! moment.
"This noisy so called Rebellion is nonsense and is doing zip. We need an organized opposition that means business not some street party with bongo drummers and flowers for the police."
Nonsense! Learn from the hippies. Too many of the sixties revolutanrities were playing a game. Their real message, clear and true, is that power rests with the people. It always has. Money is a mirage.
Conservative working people often vote Republican and conservative Democrat against their own best interests. One amazing propaganda triumph for the 1%
Direct democracy.
" popular anger"
How does that contrast with "irrational exhuberance"? The anger out here may be popularly held, but it's not popular. I would think a journalist would be more in tune with language than that. Or perhaps he wishes to paint the current discontent as merely a "popular" phenomon, a fad, a phase. Was that his intent?
Part of the reason for the success of the Occupy movement so far could be the leaderless disorganization. The normally well organized rich 1% (or is that 0.1%?) don't understand the movement and don't know how to respond to it.
Without a list of demands to downplay or concepts to disprove using clever marketing, their response looks as disorganized as the 99 percenters. And with no clear Occupy leadership, they don't have any good strategic targets to aim for.
Going after the 1% under their terms doesn't seem all that smart. I'm thinking the current strategy is actually looking pretty good.
"We are the 99%". How is that hard not to understand? I am certain the 01% understands exactly what it's based on. Denial is the first step when confronted with a loss or a poor prognosis. And the 01% has just received both. They've lost public opinion and they are well aware of what the cure will entail.
They know exactly how many of us out here have been carrying their water for them over the last few decades. It figures into their growth ratios and profit margins. They use our numbers to offset their tax cuts. They just never figured we were smart enough to get wise to their game. Or perhaps they thought we would welcome enslavement, so that they could continue in the lifestyles they've grown accustom to.
I concede that the rich know what the 99% are saying but I believe many truly do not "get it".
Like all of us, they have been conditioned to believe in "their way" of looking at the world. Most of them have lived a full pampered life of high expectations with little regard for people of lessor means. Most wouldn't recognize the exploitation no matter what the 99% does. We need to change their belief system so expect that change to be difficult. Essentially, they live the lie the 99% are now trying to expose. I don't feel sorry for them but I expect them to fight for what they believe in - you and I would.
The rich and powerful understand slogans and promotions. They know how to compete with that and they have endless resources. Let's not make it easy for them to understand.
This depression has only just begun. It is going to get ugly and bloody. It always has, historically, and always will... It is just culture and human nature!
Now we wait for the first eruption...Where? When? Who knows?
It's been 15 years since I began learning about Permaculture. It was there that I learned exactly why our economy (even back then, and before then) would implode.
Permaculture teaches that the elites need to ensure their status in life by taking care of those who made their status in the first place.
All that money is coming back to us. And every single representative of Them the Corporations will be voted out. They won't be going without a fight, unfortunately. I wish they would just give it up instead of resorting to violence.
Right now I bet Blackwater/Xe or whatever Prince's mercenaries call themselves is finding itself new "work" from the .01% I hope I'm wrong, but it will not surprise me. They think they can literally leave this planet in shambles.
I hope they come to their senses, and soon. I hope the Occupy movement would chill out and get rid of the bad apples. If they do, there is great hope for all of us as they will become the new representatives of we the people, in order to form a more perfect union.