Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A Million Face Starvation as Sudan Shuts Down
Desperate cry for help as victims of Sudan’s fit of anger lose faith, hope – and now charity
Yesterday it was closed. Its patients were sent home and doctors and nurses told not to turn up for work. The Sudanese Government, having bombed more than two million people into the camps, is expelling aid workers in retaliation against a world that wants to arrest its President.
Refugees are facing disaster, say the aid agencies expelled by Sudan after an international move to arrest the President for war crimes (Jack Hill/The Times)
Aid officials warn that a humanitarian emergency is in danger of becoming a
disaster. The move has put the supply of food to 1.1 million people in
doubt, as the UN’s World Food Programme scrambles to find lorries to deliver
sacks of grain. It had been using four of the expelled charities to get food
to people in need. Outside the hospital – run by the International Rescue
Committee until it was ordered out – a mother brushed flies from the face of
her daughter. “My baby is sick,” Fatima Abdulrahmen said. “She has a fever
and I brought her here and now I don’t know what to do. Who will help me
now?”
The people who should be helping – the staff of 13 international charities including Oxfam, Médicins sans Frontières and Care – were boarding flights to the capital, Khartoum.
Government officials began making telephone calls on Wednesday, seconds after the International Criminal Court (ICC) announced that it had issued a warrant for the arrest of President al-Bashir. They told aid agencies that their licences to operate were being revoked for passing information to ICC investigators.
Mr al-Bashir is wanted on two charges of war crimes and five of crimes against humanity in Darfur. The United Nations has estimated that 300,000 people have died in six years of fighting, many at the hands of the Janjawid – Arab militias armed by the Government and deployed as a counter-insurgence force.
The Government called mobs on to the streets of the capital yesterday in an angry show of support. More than 10,000 people, many screaming furiously, poured in to Martyrs Square to cheer on their President. Some burnt Israeli flags and effigies of Luis Moreno Ocampo, the ICC’s chief prosecutor. Mr al-Bashir, who seized power in a coup in 1989, turned his ire on the US and Europe. “We are telling the colonialists we are not succumbing. We are not submitting. We will not kneel. We are targeted because we refuse to submit,” he told the crowd.
The African Union said yesterday that it was sending a delegation to the UN to urge the Security Council to defer the arrest warrant, fearing that it could provoke more turmoil and wreck the fragile North-South peace process in Sudan. The Sudanese representative in the African Union called on African states to withdraw from the ICC in protest.
Human rights campaigners accused Sudan of holding the people of Darfur hostage. “Millions of lives are at stake and this is no time to play political games,” Tawanda Hondora, deputy director of Amnesty International’s Africa Programme, said. “These aid agencies provide the bulk of the humanitarian aid required by more than two million vulnerable people.”
In El Fasher, capital of North Darfur, government officials began the process of seizing millions of pounds in assets belonging to the charities. Men with dark glasses and clipboards arrived at the Oxfam office to begin itemising equipment. They left with laptops, desktop computers and satellite phones, choking off communication. There was a similar scene at the French agency Action Contre La Faim. “We are due to start distributing food to the camps in a fortnight,” one worker said. “Who else is going to do this and stop people starving? Words cannot describe what is happening.”
Charities reported that their bank accounts were being frozen. Doctors with Médicins sans Frontières were trying to contain two deadly outbreaks of meningitis before being expelled. Their clinics have closed.
In Abu Shouk, home to about 50,000 people, men dressed in dusty jalabayas were hammering at a water pump. This should be the work of water and sanitation engineers from Oxfam. “We don’t know how to fix it,” said one man wielding a foot-long spanner, “but we are thirsty.”
In neighbouring Al Salaam the umdas – or chiefs – gathered to discuss the news. Adam Mahmoud, the chief umda, gestured one way and then the next as he pointed out the International Rescue Committee hospital, latrines dug by Oxfam, feeding centres and camp administrative offices, all run by foreign charities. All are closed.
“If these organisations leave then there is no doubt that we will all suffer again,” he said. “It will be a disaster.”
- Posted in

15 Comments so far
Show AllI know that this view is not politically correct, but why can our military be used against "terrorists" in oil rich countries, and those with oil pipelines, but not against genocidal governments, to save the lives of millions of people? I also know that there are those who blame the indicting organization but not the country's murderous leaders. Along that line of thought, it wasn't Hitler to blame for the holocaust, but his accusers. Now, having said that, I feel it was impotent to issue an arrest warrant without the means to execute the warrant. I just think it is wrong headed to have illegally entered Iraq, and Afghanistan and now Pakistan because they posed a threat to our safety and interests, or sheltered terrorists, and not come to the rescue of an entire people being brutally raped, murdered and displaced, while being systematically starved. While we sit in debate, for years our wonderful, caring, charitable country stands by and does nothing. At the very least, a UN force could be mustered and could LAWFULLY, with proper resolution, enter The Sudan and enforce the arrest warrent, perhaps ending the genocide. Then maybe the country could be rebuilt to 21st century standards. These conditions should be a thing of the past in the world today. Perhaps the horrors can't be alleviated worldwide simultaneously, but it must start somewhere.
I agree with you john. But what is really bothering is that for Western countries is so easy to call for the arrest of politicians from poor countries, but the same standards are not applied to the Western war criminals.
I am not saying al-Bashir should not be held accountable, but it's hypocritical to do it if others world leaders have not payed the price for their blatant crimes as well.
You are correct. We do not even indict our own, let alone prosecute them. But, to do nothing here is to accept the inevitable that thousands upon thousands more will DIE! We do so much for the HAVES, but very little for the HAVE NOT'S, except lip service.
Deepa
Read about the nexus between Africa Aid, NGOs and Africom to control and plunder the natural resources in Sudan.
"Africom’s Covert War in Sudan" by Keith Harmon Snow / March 6th, 2009
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2009/03/africoms-covert-war-in-sudan/
Obama, if you are listening, send US troops to Sudan NOW! We can't allow another Rwanda!
Well JoeHope, why don't you go there and fight?
I'm 42. I can't.
Deepa
You seem to be not satisfied with American troops killing, raping and torturing Iraqis!!!
Some Americans are still caught in the delution of "American moral superiority", even though the reality is so glaring that the US is founded and sustained on genocidal violence.
Just read what Americans and their allies are doing in Africa, particlarly Congo.
Read:
"The Scramble For Africa's Oil" By Christopher Thompson, 20 June, 2007, The New Statesman.
"The US’s War In Darfur" By Keith Harmon Snow, November 23rd, 2007, Black Agenda Report.
"A Tale Of Two Genocides: Congo And Darfur," By Glen Ford, 18 July, 2007, Black Agenda Report.
"Corporations Reaping Millions as Congo Suffers Deadliest Conflict Since World War II" http://www.democracynow.org/2008/1/23/corporations_reaping_millions_as_congo_suffers
"Darfurism, Uganda and the U.S. War in Africa: The Spectre of Continental Genocide"
by Keith Harmon Snow / November 24th, 2007, www.dissidentvoice.org
"Over Five Million Dead in Congo? Fifteen Hundred People Daily? Behind the Numbers Redux: How Truth is Hidden, Even When it Seems to Be Told,"
by Keith Harmon Snow / February 4th, 2008, www.dissidentvoice.org
"It’s Time To Demilitarize US Policy in Africa: No Arms! No Transfers! No Military Aid!" by Bruce Dixon / February 28th, 2008, www.dissidentvoice.org
Do you deny that the US could have stopped the genocide in Rwanda?
We have no business in the middle east to fight for the right to steal their resources. There is no question here on that matter.
But to simply allow these people to die is more criminal than if we just nuked them! In fact, let's just fix it all and nuke the entire planet. Let's just be sure we get us all!
No superiority question here. It is a moral question pure and simple. Who helps and protects those who cannot help themselves? THAT is what would make intervention acceptable in this instance; that there is no other reason than to protect the defenseless.
And who says we have to have a full scale war? Set perimeter around the refugee's and feed them and provide medical care. And kill anyone who tries to stop us! And it should not be ONLY us doing it. This rates world involvement, with little question!
Yes! Send troops to Sudan now! We cannot allow genocide to continue under our watch.
Re., "Deepa March 6th, 2009 5:47 pm",
Thanks for the links to [good] resources. I had already read a number of Keith Harmon Snow's articles, as well as some articles by other people posted at www.globalresearch.ca , where relevant articles for the topic of the ICC's BOGUS, etcetera, present indictment of Sudanese President Bashir can be found. Perhaps they won't be articles specific to this present topic, but they'll definitely be relevant, very.
I checked the article by Bruce Dixon at dissidentvoice.org that you had referred readers to and just saw that Keith Harmon Snow has a new article posted there, a piece specifically about this present and bogus ICC indictment of President Bashir.
"Africom’s Covert War in Sudan", by Keith Harmon Snow, March 6th, 2009
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2009/03/africoms-covert-war-in-sudan
His website, btw, is www.allthingspass.com .
It's the imperialist, colonialist, corporatist, ... West that is guilty for the conflict in Darfur. It's not the fault of the Sudanese government and President Bashir. Plenty of qualitative and stronger researchers, analysts, writers, ... have written on the situation in Darfur as well as conflicts in other African countries, and it's rather always the imperialist, ... West that's the most guilty, along with the criminal, heinous, ... leaders they want to head governments where there are plenty of resources to profit from. It's the same throughout U.S. history, like all of it. It continues in Canada, under the imperialist, colonialist, corporatist, fascist, ... government(s) here. It's happening to indigenous peoples ... [globally].
The ICC's indictment was a meaningless self-righteous gesture. They knew they were not going to arrest and try him- so why do it?
Except it was worse then meaningless. Everyone knew al-Bashir would do what he has done. This is certainly not to excuse al Bashir for any of his war crimes, or even for booting ths NGOs. But when the ICC knows in advance what the consequences of their actions will be- as they certainly did in this case- and then they go ahead and do it anyway they must absolutely share the blame for what is now happening, with the health workers banished. They could now indict themselves as war criminals.
"johntwodogs March 6th, 2009 11:51 am
I know that this view is not politically correct, but why can our military be used against "terrorists" in oil rich countries, and those with oil pipelines, but not against genocidal governments, to save the lives of millions of people? I also know that there are those who blame the indicting organization but not the country's murderous leaders."
YOU NEED to read much more than you have, for you're awfully un- or mis-informed about the situation in the Darfur region of Sudan. The same likely enough applies with respect to other parts of the country as well as the many enough different groups in Sudan. And it probably extends with respect to other countries where there are problems.
The post by Deepa and in which he provided links to several good resources is a good place for people like you to start getting [informed]. There's really no point in any of you pretending that you can have any legitimate opinion on the situations in Sudan's Darfur or anywhere else when you haven't made any serious efforts to become adequately informed. To express opinions or views based on ignorance and therefore misplaced or misformed good intentions is not a way to live. As has been said long enough, "good" intentions sometimes pave paths to hell, or, as I'll differently say, pave paths of hell's likings.
See Deepa's post, and I hadn't noticed his first one, but posted a link to the same March 6th, 2009, article by Keith Harmon Snow. READ that article and the others Deepa referred to. Actually, he didn't provide URL's and to help encourage people to read these pieces I'll provide the URL's now; while breaking the longer ones over two lines since CD will truncate them.
"The scramble for Africa's oil:
Within a decade, the US will be heavily dependent on African oil. Little wonder the Pentagon is preparing a strategy for the region",
by Christopher Thompson, Jun 14 2007
http://www.newstatesman.com/global-issues/2007/06/
africa-oil-pentagon-military
"A Tale of Two Genocides, Congo and Darfur:
The Blatantly Inconsistent U.S. Position",
by Glen Ford, executive editor of BAR, Jul 17 2007
http://www.blackagendareport.com/?q=node/10284
"Corporations Reaping Millions as Congo Suffers Deadliest Conflict Since World War II",
Jan 23 2009
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/1/23/
corporations_reaping_millions_as_congo_suffers
"It’s Time To Demilitarize US Policy in Africa
No Arms! No Transfers! No Military Aid!",
by Bruce Dixon, Feb 28 2008
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/
no-arms-no-transfers-no-military-aid-its-time-to-demilitarize-us-policy-in-africa
My prior post has the article Deepa had initially posted a link for palso linked, the piece by KH Snow and of today. That article is perhaps the very first one people should read, because it's specifically about the bogus, imperialist, ... indictment of Sudanese President al-Bashir, who too many people demonise, as we see also evidenced in this page here at CD. Keith Snow definitely knows what he's talking about.
Another resource, among more at other websites, is the relevant index or subindex at www.globalresearch.ca . There may possibly be some articles linked in the homepage today or over the coming dsys, too.
A word of WARNING: Beware of the cries of humanitarian aid organisations and agencies, for they're too often mistaken, based on disinfo. or misinfo., etcetera, and it's sometimes while they're aware of this, while other cases are unwitting, really believing the information they're based on is true, factual. It happens with Amnesty Intl, HRW, and many others, and USAID is never one to believe when it's pretending to have any legitimate bases upon which to criticize leaders of states the imperialist West is actually demonising and for reasons as presented in articles Deepa provided titles for, along with the names of the authors and dates; that is, the above-linked articles and the one linked in my prior post in this page. Amnesty Intl, f.e., has cried out for the U.S. and NATO to intervene in the Darfurian region of Sudan and has made related false statements, but it's bogus of AI to call on the U.S. and NATO for interventions when many of the leaders of the U.S. and other NATO countries really should be indicted and prosecuted for their extreme, supreme international crimes. And there's more than that for reasons to ... BEWARE.
Commenting specifically on the article, which I just read, I think the AU, African Union, is making a good call in asking the UNSC to defer the indictment of Sudanese President al-Bashir. I definitely agree with that call.
As for the rest of what the article says, well:
a) The ICC is an instrument of the imperialist, etcetera, West.
b) If the ICC had any real credit-worthiness, then it would have indicted the leaders of the governments of the U.S., Israel, and leaders of all aiding and abetting ally governments in Europe, and Canada, but the ICC has never done this and clearly has no plans of ever doing so.
c) Repeat, of point 'a', above.
d) What the article reports as claims of some Darfurians about their situations does not constitute proven fact. We don't know the truth about those words. Such Darfurians could be really speaking as the article says, but doing so for the Western imperialists who want control in Sudan and very much for its energy resources.
e) The humanitarian aid agencies are not necessarily speaking or representing only truth and real humanitarianism, respect for human rights and laws, treaties, conventions, morality, etcetera; some could be rather criminally biased, some could be lying considerably and for the purpose of trying to support the agenda of the imperialist West. That sometimes literally happens, I've read, and have found for myself; but the same reading said that humanitarian aid agencies or organisations and NGO's sometimes do this unwittingly and due to not being adequately informed, yet while some do it wittingly, knowing they're lying and for the imperialist West.
f) If those humanitarian aid agencies referred to in the article think the situation in Darfur is such a big deal, then why aren't they doing even more in the case of the Congo? And we can add Israel, Iraq, and more. The situation the the Congo has been long worse, much worse, than what's happening in Darfurian Sudan. See the article by Glen Ford and the DemocracyNow.org pieces Deepa first referred to by titles and authors, but didn't link, so I linked them in my prior post before this one in this CD page.
A continuation on point 'e', above:
The agencies or organisations don't always tell the truth and this sometimes is while they know that they're lying. I forget the details, but this happened during the aftermath years of the act-of-war coup against the Haitian government and its population on Feb. 29, 2004. I believe to recall that MSF, Medecins Sans Frontieres, was reporting some lies in that particular crisis, too. Haiti's been apparently having a lot of humanitarian crisis times over the past several years and recently, but where's the international humanitarian aid and "community" for Haiti?!
Jesus said to BEWARE of FALSE PROPHETS, and the same warning really needs to be understand about more than only religious prophets!
That they call themselves humanitarian aid agencies or organisations doesn't mean that they're always true to these claims, what they profess and really do isn't guaranteed to always match up. Plenty of people in the West profess to be Christian and clearly aren't; or some of those types are to some extent, but to none that actually is very significant, while the others simply aren't true to their words at all. Politicians lie on a regular basis; religious people falsely profess to be of ... whatever religious faiths they profess to believe in and to adhere to; liars, cheats, charlatans, incompetents, self-righteous people, and so on, are as old as humanity is.
Courts don't often enough adhere to sane justice and some blatantly act in rogue, etcetera ways; and the ICC has been providing strong examples of this for too many years now.
There's nothing to guarantee that humaniterian aid agencies and organisations are infallible; to guarantee that they can't be incompetent, self-righteous, corrupted, biased, etcetera. Some are better than others, but none are infallible.
The Times, UK, article is very worthless news coverage. It's not worthless in terms of permitting us to see that it's awfully superficial and provides no real analysis, research, ..., but the value of what it says is otherwise worthless. It's a junk "news" article far more of the deceitful propaganda kind than it is of any good kind; but while I do appreciate the AU taking the position of opposing the indictment of President al-Bashir, whose government is nowhere as guilty as the Times, UK, article and articles from other "news" media would have readers believe, if and when readers are that gullible.
READ from serious researchers and analysts who are unbiased, truthful, knowledgeable, ...! They are the people I will believe.