EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Increasingly, War Tax Resisters Defy IRS in Protest Over Iraq
Bryan Nelson's federal tax return says he owes $3,082. So he mailed his 1040 form to the IRS before tomorrow's filing deadline. But for the second year in a row, the New Brunswick man did not send what he owes.His reason: "I wasn't going to pay for an illegal war in Iraq."
Nelson, 26, told the IRS as much in a letter included with his 2006 tax return and did the same thing last year, when he owed about $1,100. Both times he also included a list of charities where he sent the money instead. One is an organization that aids wounded war veterans.
In taking this step, Nelson joins the ranks of an estimated 10,000 Americans who will not pay federal taxes or pay only a portion of what they owe as a means of protesting the Iraq war or the nation's defense expenditures.
The IRS says opposition to government policies is no excuse for not giving Uncle Sam his due.
"Taxpayers have a right to express their opinions to the government in a public and private forum," the agency said in a statement. "The actions of expressing your opinion and also fulfilling your legal responsibilities of filing and paying taxes on a timely basis are separate issues."
Nelson, who works as a union organizer, considers what he is doing an act of civil disobedience. He knows his decision could lead to penalties including fines or jail.
"It's a serious act to violate the law," he said. "I respect the law and the tax system. I'm not trying to evade taxes. I'm just trying to minimize my complicity in what the government is doing. I want my money to go where it can help."
Although there is no concrete evidence that opposition to the war in Iraq portends an increase in the number of people who practice what is known as "war tax resistance," there are signs it is at least stoking interest in the practice, which dates to the Revolutionary War.
The renewed interest is being tracked by Ed Hedemann, a 62-year-old Brooklyn man who helped found the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee in 1982. Daily hits on his organization's Web site have grown from an average of about 150 hits-a- day three years ago to about 800-a-day now.
"There is a steady increase in awareness," Hedemann said. "Obviously, not everybody who looks at our site is going to participate in war tax resistance, but this is at least an indication of the interest."
Another sign of interest is expected today, with the introduction of federal legislation to allow people opposed to military spending on religious or moral grounds to have their tax dollars go to federal agencies not involved in defense.
Although the legislation has been introduced in every Congressional session since 1972, its expected to have 45 co-sponsors this year, the largest number ever, according to the National Campaign for a Peace Tax Fund, a Washington organization lobbying for the measure.
People like Hedemann, however, aren't waiting for a change in the tax code. Hede mann, a staunch peace activist, hasn't sent the IRS a dime since 1970 and instead has forwarded the $70,000 he owes for his work as a freelance writer and photographer to charity. The government has yet to collect. The IRS can not collect personal income taxes owed for more than 10 years.
"Sure, they come after me on a regular basis," he said. "But one of the things that helps me is that I file. I don't do anything funny with my forms. Plus, I'm self-employed and don't make a lot of money."
The closest the government ever came was in 1999, when Hedemann ended up in federal court. He escaped having to pay what the IRS said he owed.
Peter Goldberger, the lawyer who represented Hedemann, was not surprised. The criminal defense attorney who practices in suburban Philadelphia has represented dozens of war tax resisters.
He said that in general, the IRS goes easier on war tax resisters than it does the far larger universe of people who aren't paying because they simply want to keep the money or because they are affiliated with groups that claim that the federal government is not legally entitled to collect taxes.
Although the IRS says there is a gap of roughly $290 billion between taxes owed and received, Golberger's experience has shown that there's very little of it to collect from war tax resisters.
"Some of these folks go out of their way not to earn a taxable income," Goldberger said. Others generally file timely returns and explain why they're not paying some or all of what they owe.
"That protects them against most of the penalties the IRS can impose. Penalties are geared toward the level of deceit," Goldberger said.
Although the federal government filed criminal charges against war tax resisters fewer than 50 times since World War II, the most recent case was in New Jersey and the penalties were severe.
In 2005, three members of a Vineland- based religious society called the Restored Israel of Yahweh were sentenced to federal prison terms ranging from six to 27 months for failing to pay $300,000 in taxes from a construction company they owned on the grounds that their religious beliefs precluded funding war.
Goldberger, who represented one of the defendants, said they were sincere in their beliefs. But they made several errors, including failing to pay state taxes and withholding taxes for employees.
"I don't think they were fraudulent, but they did some things that allowed a prosecutor to portray them as fraudulent," Goldberger said.
Nelson, the New Brunswick man, expects the IRS will eventually come after him for what he owes. But he's mentally prepared for the worst.
"Jail is extremely rare," he said. "But if it's the price I have to pay, it's the price I have to pay."
Wayne Woolley may be reached at wwoolley@starledger.com
© 2007 The Star Ledger
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

8 Comments so far
Show AllThere are laws against funding terrorist organizations. The U.S. government operates as a terrorist organization by waging wars of aggression, torturing prisoners, abducting suspects for extraordinary renditions, etc. Therefore, it is illegal to fund the U.S. government by paying taxes. It is also illegal not to pay taxes.
The U.S. government's foundation rests on the Declaration of Independence from Brittain justified, primarily, by the principle of "No taxation without representation".
Without representation, taxation is mere extortion.
If 60-70% of the U.S. population wants out of the war in Iraq, but Congress won't do anything about that, then it's clear we don't have representation in Congress. No one is presenting or re-presenting the will of the people in the halls of Congress, or if they are, it is in numbers and ways that are calculated to be ineffective.
If there is a mandate among the people not to fund the war (because that's the only way Congress can stop a war) and Congress fails to re-present that mandate by continuing to fund the war in spite of the crystal clear message of the voters last November, what then?
If Congress won't stop funding the war, we have to stop funding the war. It's up to us.
Right on, clarkkent! Specifically, the Patriot Act, H.R. 3162, Executive Order 13224 and UNSC Resolution 1373 make it a crime to give money to groups committing acts of terrorism or supporting others who do. In fact, Exec. Order 3162 defines an act of terrorism as destroying civilian infrastructure. So as the attack on Iraq has destroyed their electrical, water, sewage, education and health systems; and we give more aid to Israel than any other country, and they have no problem dropping cluster bombs helter-skelter wherever they choose; then it must be a crime to give money to the U.S. government. If a member of the National Guard can be a conscientious objector, then taxpayers must have the same right. And I suspect far more people are claiming that right than we truly know. The revolution will not be podcast.
Thank you CactusPie! I appreciate your research. You'd make a good reporter. Let me know if you ever want me to put in a good word for you here at The Daily Planet.
I forgot to mention that, according to Aaron Russo's new film: "America: Freedom to Fascism" my assertion that "It is also illegal not to pay taxes" might be inaccurate. Apparently, there is no actual law that requires people to pay income tax and the 16th amendment which supposedly gave the feds the right to tax income may not have been properly ratified by the states.
So, given that paying taxes is definitely against the law and that not paying taxes might be perfectly legal, it would appear that the safest course at this time, to avoid running afoul of the law, would probably be to not pay taxes. Unless I'm missing something?
clarkkent April 16th, 2007 1:20 pm
cactuspie April 16th, 2007 5:58 pm
Have you guys ever the read: "Vultures in Eagles Clothing" by Lynne Meredith?
This attorney spent 2 years of her life researching the Constitution with regard to income taxes. If you haven't read this book, you MUST! Why MUST you read this book?
Because in one of his "State Of The Union" Speeches, George W. Bush stated that "income taxes were voluntary". Does that give you a clue?
Remember that federal funding of abortion was eliminated as a concession to the taxpayers who didn't want their tax dollars spent in such an "immoral" fashion. I'd say the precedent is clear, and the same principle should apply.
Gail April 16th, 2007 9:02 pm
not sure that would be good advice
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20020418-9999_1mc18taxbust.html
seems they were arrested
Gail, Can you point us to the State of the Union speech where GWB states that income taxes are voluntary? That would be most interesting.
BTW, there is a widening gap between what is illegal and what will get you arrested.