Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
From Our Archives: A Time to Weep
Commencement speech at the New School University in New York on May 21, 2004
This is not a speech. Two weeks ago I set aside the speech I prepared. This is a cry from the heart, a lamentation for the loss of this country's goodness and therefore its greatness.
Future historians studying the decline and fall of America will mark this as the time the tide began to turn - toward a mean-spirited mediocrity in place of a noble beacon.
For me the final blow was American guards laughing over the naked, helpless bodies of abused prisoners in Iraq. "There is a time to laugh," the Bible tells us, "and a time to weep." Today I weep for the country I love, the country I proudly served, the country to which my four grandparents sailed over a century ago with hopes for a new land of peace and freedom. I cannot remain silent when that country is in the deepest trouble of my lifetime.
I am not talking only about the prison abuse scandal, that stench will someday subside. Nor am I referring only to the Iraq war - that too will pass - nor to any one political leader or party. This is no time for politics as usual, in which no one responsible admits responsibility, no one genuinely apologizes, no one resigns and everyone else is blamed.
The damage done to this country by its own misconduct in the last few months and years, to its very heart and soul, is far greater and longer lasting than any damage that any terrorist could possibly inflict upon us.
The stain on our credibility, our reputation for decency and integrity, will not quickly wash away.
Last week, a family friend of an accused American guard in Iraq recited the atrocities inflicted by our enemies on Americans, and asked: "Must we be held to a different standard?" My answer is YES. Not only because others expect it. WE must hold ourselves to a different standard. Not only because God demands it, but because it serves our security.
Our greatest strength has long been not merely our military might but our moral authority. Our surest protection against assault from abroad has been not all our guards, gates and guns or even our two oceans, but our essential goodness as a people. Our richest asset has been not our material wealth but our values.
We were world leaders once - helping found the United Nations, the Marshall Plan, NATO, and programs like Food for Peace, international human rights and international environmental standards. The world admired not only the bravery of our Marine Corps but also the idealism of our Peace Corps.
Our word was as good as our gold. At the start of the Cuban Missile Crisis, former Secretary of State Dean Acheson, President Kennedy's special envoy to brief French President de Gaulle, offered to document our case by having the actual pictures of Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba brought in. "No," shrugged the usually difficult de Gaulle: "The word of the President of the United States is good enough for me."
Eight months later, President Kennedy could say at American University: "The world knows that America will never start a war. This generation of Americans has had enough of war and hate ... we want to build a world of peace where the weak are secure and the strong are just."
Our founding fathers believed this country could be a beacon of light to the world, a model of democratic and humanitarian progress. We were. We prevailed in the Cold War because we inspired millions struggling for freedom in far corners of the Soviet empire. I have been in countries where children and avenues were named for Lincoln, Jefferson, Franklin Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy. We were respected, not reviled, because we respected man's aspirations for peace and justice. This was the country to which foreign leaders sent not only their goods to be sold but their sons and daughters to be educated. In the 1930's, when Jewish and other scholars were driven out of Europe, their preferred destination - even for those on the far left - was not the Communist citadel in Moscow but the New School here in New York.
What has happened to our country? We have been in wars before, without resorting to sexual humiliation as torture, without blocking the Red Cross, without insulting and deceiving our allies and the U.N., without betraying our traditional values, without imitating our adversaries, without blackening our name around the world.
Last year when asked on short notice to speak to a European audience, and inquiring what topic I should address, the Chairman said: "Tell us about the good America, the America when Kennedy was in the White House." "It is still a good America," I replied. "The American people still believe in peace, human rights and justice; they are still a generous, fair-minded, open-minded people."
Today some political figures argue that merely to report, much less to protest, the crimes against humanity committed by a few of our own inadequately trained forces in the fog of war, is to aid the enemy or excuse its atrocities. But Americans know that such self-censorship does not enhance our security. Attempts to justify or defend our illegal acts as nothing more than pranks or no worse than the crimes of our enemies, only further muddies our moral image. 30 years ago, America's war in Vietnam became a hopeless military quagmire; today our war in Iraq has become a senseless moral swamp.
No military victory can endure unless the victor occupies the high moral ground. Surely America, the land of the free, could not lose the high moral ground invading Iraq, a country ruled by terror, torture and tyranny - but we did.
Instead of isolating Saddam Hussein - politically, economically, diplomatically, much as we succeeded in isolating Khadafy, Marcos, Mobutu and a host of other dictators over the years, we have isolated ourselves. We are increasingly alone in a dangerous world in which millions who once respected us now hate us.
Not only Muslims. Every international survey shows our global standing at an all-time low. Even our transatlantic alliance has not yet recovered from its worst crisis in history. Our friends in Western Europe were willing to accept Uncle Sam as class president, but not as class bully, once he forgot JFK's advice that "Civility is not a sign of weakness."
All this is rationalized as part of the war on terror. But abusing prisoners in Iraq, denying detainees their legal rights in Guantanamo, even American citizens, misleading the world at large about Saddam's ready stockpiles of mass destruction and involvement with al Qaeda at 9/11, did not advance by one millimeter our efforts to end the threat of another terrorist attack upon us. On the contrary, our conduct invites and incites new attacks and new recruits to attack us.
The decline in our reputation adds to the decline in our security. We keep losing old friends and making new enemies - not a formula for success. We have not yet rounded up Osama bin Laden or most of the al Qaeda and Taliban leaders or the anthrax mailer. "The world is large," wrote John Boyle O'Reilly, in one of President Kennedy's favorite poems, "when its weary leagues two loving hearts divide, but the world is small when your enemy is loose on the other side." Today our enemies are still loose on the other side of the world, and we are still vulnerable to attack.
True, we have not lost either war we chose or lost too much of our wealth. But we have lost something worse - our good name for truth and justice. To paraphrase Shakespeare: "He who steals our nation's purse, steals trash. T'was ours, tis his, and has been slave to thousands. But he that filches our good name ... makes us poor indeed."
No American wants us to lose a war. Among our enemies are those who, if they could, would fundamentally change our way of life, restricting our freedom of religion by exalting one faith over others, ignoring international law and the opinions of mankind; and trampling on the rights of those who are different, deprived or disliked. To the extent that our nation voluntarily trods those same paths in the name of security, the terrorists win and we are the losers.
We are no longer the world's leaders on matters of international law and peace. After we stopped listening to others, they stopped listening to us. A nation without credibility and moral authority cannot lead, because no one will follow.
Paradoxically, the charges against us in the court of world opinion are contradictory. We are deemed by many to be dangerously aggressive, a threat to world peace. You may regard that as ridiculously unwarranted, no matter how often international surveys show that attitude to be spreading. But remember the old axiom: "No matter how good you feel, if four friends tell you you're drunk, you better lie down."
Yet we are also charged not so much with intervention as indifference - indifference toward the suffering of millions of our fellow inhabitants of this planet who do not enjoy the freedom, the opportunity, the health and wealth and security that we enjoy; indifference to the countless deaths of children and other civilians in unnecessary wars, countless because we usually do not bother to count them; indifference to the centuries of humiliation endured previously in silence by the Arab and Islamic worlds.
The good news, to relieve all this gloom, is that a democracy is inherently self-correcting. Here, the people are sovereign. Inept political leaders can be replaced. Foolish policies can be changed. Disastrous mistakes can be reversed.
When, in 1941, the Japanese Air Force was able to inflict widespread death and destruction on our naval and air forces in Hawaii because they were not on alert, those military officials most responsible for ignoring advance intelligence were summarily dismissed.
When, in the late 1940's, we faced a global Cold War against another system of ideological fanatics certain that their authoritarian values would eventually rule the world, we prevailed in time. We prevailed because we exercised patience as well as vigilance, self-restraint as well as self-defense, and reached out to moderates and modernists, to democrats and dissidents, within that closed system. We can do that again. We can reach out to moderates and modernists in Islam, proud of its long traditions of dialogue, learning, charity and peace.
Some among us scoff that the war on Jihadist terror is a war between civilization and chaos. But they forget that there were Islamic universities and observatories long before we had railroads.
So do not despair. In this country, the people are sovereign. If we can but tear the blindfold of self-deception from our eyes and loosen the gag of self-denial from our voices, we can restore our country to greatness. In particular, you - the Class of 2004 - have the wisdom and energy to do it. Start soon.
In the words of the ancient Hebrews:
"The day is short, and the work is great, and the laborers are sluggish, but the reward is much, and the Master is urgent."

36 Comments so far
Show AllDying on Halloween to mingle with the ghosts he's been serving and thinking for?
Did JFK come to get him?
*
Good speech, though.
"If we can but tear the blindfold of self-deception from our eyes and loosen the gag of self-denial from our voices, we can restore our country to greatness." Only not the same kind of "greatness" as before. Any new greatness will perforce be a humbler greatness, if at all.
This is a good article, but as one who has been against the Kennedy haters on the progressive end of political spectrum and one who strongly supported John F Kennedy when he was president, I have to say that NATO wasn't any good in the first place. That is also the judgement of George Kennan who was always known as a hardliner on Moscow's "terrible Communists." The Marshall Plan also left a bit to be desired, as it provided no help to Eastern Europe including the USSR which suffered the most from that war. Add to that the favorite destination of the Jewish victims of the Holocaust was actually the USSR as proven by their going there for sanctuary during this time, over half of them actually. The USA and the UK would have provide more aid to the Jews but the bosses of the international Zionist movement opposed this all out and pressured British and US governments to keep the Jews out.
Again I have the greatest respect for Ted Soreenson, and after his death in no way do I mean to diminish his contribution to the public service of this country.
AD
A thoughtful and illuminating comment, AD.
RIP Ted Sorenson.
Boo (not a Halloween scare sound, but a sound to denote what I think about this 'speech' and him supporting Barack Obama).
"We prevailed in the Cold War because we inspired millions struggling for freedom in far corners of the Soviet empire."
But then you won (or thought so) and all of the countervailing constraints on the only "freedom" that actually lies at the systemic heart of America were repealed. USA Incorporated's version of "freedom and democracy" then realised its opportunity (both globally and domestically) to show its true colors as a virtual monopoly unopposed by the "evil empire" with a competing system of societal values.
Capitalism is now free at last to accomplish its full glorious potential worldwide as well as at home. Free at last. Thank Mammon almighty, we are free at last.
One keyword: torture
We done it, and maybe continue...
We also imprison & kill without judicial review.
We're criminals masquerading as "helpers"
JFK. The last good President.
Seeing the evil that controls and direct our nation, that has slithered out of the woodwork over the past 9+ years, its easy to see why they killed him.
I'm afraid we haven't a clue as to how deep in sh*t we are right now. We are sitting right on top of the wildest beast ever known to man.
Who can corral it?
If John F Kennedy was last great US president, it may well be that Harold Wilson seeking to like him was the last great British prime minister, but instead of literally getting assassinated, he faced a characterization from the US intelligence community's like numbers in London and had to resign. This came out in the BBC over a year ago. It too was coup, and Lord Mountbatten whom the iRA put out of the British people's misery was damn well in on it. Someday someone will have to write the British equivalent of JFK and Unspeakable on the coup against Wilson. Wilson resigned rather than have British army tanks rumble through the streets of London and else where to save innocent lives and give up his political career. So much for good guys on both sides of the Atlantic. Red Pepper,a British progressive magazine had an article on the Wilson coup way back, also I think over a year ago. It was based on what came out of the BBC. Now we can as Michael Parenti would say stop some of this conspiracy phobia that so many on the progressive end of ideological spectrum have been so prone to in the past. It actually does happen as those with power and privileges don't like giving them up which Parenti so ably points out.
AD
I see the U.S. as an immense snake that has been decapitated. It's writhing and thrashing on the earth (our wars), bleeding profusely (our economy), and looping over and around itself (our elections). The only question remaining is how long before it dies?
I don't really see that Ted Sorenson is saying the USA should engage in exceptionalist policies. On the contrary he advocates the opposite. But he is likely wrong about certain events taking place in history such as the Cold War, but since other than Henry Wallace, Glen Taylor, and their supporters in 1948 were the ones who were right in time and less than three per cent of the vote then and didn't grab power after then, it's a bit much to expect that policies would move in that direction even if they should have. I share that view, but no politician is going to go out to commit political suicide to achieve this noble end. Glen Taylor served one term which ended in 1951 and never got another one. He had been elected in 1944. In 1956 when he sought a come back, he failed. Idaho ended up ;with Frank Church, who didn't turn out all that bad.
AD
"Our greatest strength has long been not merely our military might but our moral authority. [etc] "
what a crock.
would that be the moral authority that kept slaves or killed off the native cultures?
or the one that locked kids up with murderers for refusing the draft, refusing to kill?
but I'm sure you all know the litany.
Or the moral authority that committed coups all over the world, putting brutal dictators in charge. Starting in 53 when the Shaw was inserted for BP. And of course Haiti with the Duviers. So much blood
Thanks Rich.
I couldn't get past the "noble beacon" bullshit.
A nation founded on genocide and slavery as noble beacon.
Sorry folks JFK was just another cop. Amazing what illusions people hold to.
Agreed. Well done, Rich.
Well, you're right mcoyote. JFK was just another "cop". I have no illusions regarding that.
But, at points in time, I'd like to think there are pivotal moments, there is a turn that points us in the right direction, of becoming what humankind is capable of, of being a better species, using our minds and not guns. I think, that JFK, possessed that quality. I still believe he was a "good cop" in a sea of bad ones, especially given all the others we've had since.
On the other hand, the MIC would have gotten what it wanted one way or another: control of the planet, in order to make the "world safe for democracy" a.k.a. U.S. / Western Europe corporations.
My what a long and bloody road they took us all down. And they're still not through with us.
Camelot (sigh) is hard to shake.
Sorry mcoyote (and Rich), but you're just another leftoid cliche who knows nothing about what you're talking about.
For those with still open brains, go here to see just how JFK was just another cop:
http://ejkred.blogspot.com/2010/06/warmth-of-sun.html
And here for the best book yet written on the subject:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1439193886/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=1570757550&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=1V6F11EVFMA6EM671HBC
And author Jim Douglass's brilliant and very moving speech from 2008:
http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/517
Or, stick to your illusions like these two chuckleheads.
RichM is right on target and devastates what is either a very naive person that believes his ignorant rhetoric or knows his speech was just another pack of lies for the naive and gullible. " This reverence for U.S. military endeavors is a national disease ". The only antidote I can see to this patriotic miasma, is to make wars nationally unpatriotic and peace nationally patriotic. But unfortunately, the chances of that happening are probably not going to happen, because like he said: " no American wants to lose a war ". I would qualify that statement to: no brainwashed American that has a reverence for U.S. military endeavors wants to lose a war and that is the vast majority of the American sheeple. Read this speech and weep!
Moral Authority?
Since when.
"Our greatest strength has long been not merely our military might but our moral authority."
Pretty words. Utter bullshit.
This is a memorial to a remarkable American public servant, who died TODAY at the age of 82.
More than six years ago, at the age of 76, the man gave a prescient commencement speech to New School University, a speech full of weltschmertz and pain -"a cry from the heart, a lamentation for the loss of this country's goodness and therefore its greatness."
I join this topic with circa 20 comments preceding me. What I read revolts me.
Fuck each and every one of you who is smugly trashing Mr. Sorensen: criticizing his life and career, criticizing his amazing 2004 speech to university students, and shitting upon both the existential and physical pain he suffered at the end of his life.
"I've upped my standards. Up yours." --Pat Paulsen
Trylon
N.B. CNN and Wikipedia are using =sen= rather than =son= to spell his name.
Be more specific.
RichM cogently dissected Sorensen's speech and took apart his ideas. Maybe you could defend them without the sentimentality. No?
Maybe you are a true believer in America, Kennedy, Camelot and don't care much for corrective measures of a historical nature.
Anyway, the speech is appalling on so many levels. Bring your gripe to the millions of dead children slaughtered at the hands of the entity being lauded by Mr. Sorensen.
If you are so naive and/or ignorant so as to believe in the "goodness and greatness" of the United States then you deserve no mercy.
"Fuck each and every one of you"
no thanks, but thanks for the offer.
HEADS UP
1. This article was posted by CD as soon as someone learned of the passing of Ted Sorensen. It re-posts an extremely poignant piece BY Ted Sorensen, composed six years ago. In effect, this was a =Memorial= gesture by Common Dreams. Got it?
2. But it was not TREATED by first responders as a Memorial - it was treated as a =regular daily article= while the body of Ted Sorensen was still cooling and being EMBALMED. Why piss on the man NOW? You are pissing on the hands of the Funeral Director.
3. The validity of any criticism is totally irrelevant - and I have no intention of disputing what was written. The defense offered is the same defense offered by asshole Fred Phelps. What was written was in response to an ARTICLE, not to a MEMORIAL. The critical responses could have waited till he was in the ground.
4. Study up on the Golden Rule. Try acting with =class=.
Trylon
Since when does arrogance and war mongering deserve respect.
Thank you, Trylon.
This is a man who accomplished much and lived his highest ideals as best he could given the context of the times in which he lived. May the rest of us do so well.
It is imperative that we change our government, as we are advised in our Declaration of Independence. All the above statements that we are depraved and our democracy is gone are true. As are the statements about 9/11.
It is hard for us to face the truth of what our nation has become. Denial is a strong force that does not let us look at what has happened. We don't want to know the truth; but we need to face the facts and get angry. We need that just anger to build a forceful movement of people to change our government.
Remain inert and we will all suffer the degradation and poverty of neo/fuedalism. It's just a day or so until the mid term election. Don't vote for anyone who is in Congress now. They are corrupted beyond repair. Kick them out and let's try to change things---or at least make a final protest. It is a time of mourning for our dreams of justice and fairness. Instead we have the rich and their greed -- while the people and the earth suffer.
Moonpie wrote:
>JFK was just another "cop"...But, at points in time, I'd like to think there are pivotal moments, there is a turn that points us in the right direction, of becoming what humankind is capable of, of being a better species, using our minds and not guns. I think, that JFK, possessed that quality. I still believe he was a "good cop" in a sea of bad ones, especially given all the others we've had since.]
Agree with you, Moonpie. He was THE bright, shining light.
America, wither goest thou?
Do you understand, or even know, exactly how
You came to this point in time and space,
Where you hold the destiny of the entire human race
In your gentle hands -- or iron fists?
Being forced to make such terrible choice -- will you resist?
Upon your brow, that shining star
Proves: "A Nation Under God", you truly are!
But is it the God of prophets and priests?
Or the "god" of a somewhat far cruder beast?
In the end, which will you truly serve?
Will it be a Crown of Glory -- or shame -- you will deserve?
When I pray, "God Bless!" with my heart of grief,
These wounds in my hands are those of a robber and a thief!
In the end (when all is said and done)
It's what we do (and not what we say) which proves who won!
_____
as far as I can make out from my notes, this was written around the same time as TS's speech
to Rich M. agree with everything ......trylon, your heart's in the right place but the myth of " specialness" has gotten us where we are today. Kennedy was different. I refer everyone to Talbot's book " Brothers "....... tonite at the world series game two evil men were honored. The Bushies, G.H.W, and little wanker. Russ Baker's book, "Family of Secrets" is a must read to realize that Sorenson"s idealism died on 22 November 1963. The shadow government is alive and well,and plotting a false flag when required to stir up enough jingoism to war and plunder with the public"s approval Only If 911 is truly investigated will the MIC be exposed for what it is, a racket.
we don't need 911 to expose the war racket
everyone already knows
REPEAT : EVERYONE KNOWS WAR IS A RACKET
it isn't a secret
it's been written about for millenia
Here in the USA Smedley did a good job of describing the war racket. 70 years ago.
Thus, since the rackets continued we can deduce that exposing the rackets did nothing to stop them.
There is no reason to believe that a new "expose" will do anything.
Absolutely true, Morticia! " There is no reason to believe that a new "expose"will do anything ". That is the definition of American, Fascism.
"If they ever find out what we did".....
http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/MENA/mena.php
What is this guy talking about? When was it that America was what he imagines it was?
Another pitiful "once we were great" argument.
RichM: well said (as usual)
Now here's what puzzles me. I agree with most of the comments made here: Sorensen's rationalizations of American exceptionalism, military and moral righteousness, ad nauseum. I'm also aware of the apparent shifts in JFK's perspective in the year before his death (and I AM familiar with the speeches you can view at http://ejkred.blogspot.com/2010/06/warmth-of-sun.html).
But both his and Sorensen's hands still drip with blood, and both served a corporate-controlled, dollar-fueled, propaganda-spewing death machine that sees people as the lubricant it needs to ingest to keep running.
Back to my puzzlement: both men were smart and well-read, and had considerable worldwide experience, so did they really believe their own bullshit?
Can one's worldview be so warped that even attempts at righteous justice are thwarted or at least deflected into violent exertions?
I believe in fairness and justice - to all sentient species - and my worldview is thus filtered; what base motivation must lie at the center of people like Sorensen, JFK and Jimmy Carter?
Listen to Sorensen's interview on the (yech!) Diane Rehm radio show and how he excuses what he unleashed on the rest of the world. Listen to Jon Stewart fawn over Jimmy Carter (who I happen to like and I believe to be a very decent man) about how no missiles were fired, no tanks unleashed, yadda yadda, and JC never says "But I soaked the fields of Central America with the blood of its people so voters wouldn't think I was soft on communism." Or whatever his reasons really were.
Do they really just not see it?! Or are they throwing us more bullshit?
Oh, and Trylon, right back at you: go have carnal relations with YOURSELF. You tell people who dare criticize someone to go fuck themselves and then admonish others to, and I quote, "Study up on the Golden Rule. Try acting with =class=."
I can just imagine you up there next to Bill Clinton praising Nixon because 1. he's dead and 2. he did some good things like establishing the EPA and wanting to institute a guaranteed annual income for everyone. I agree, both are praiseworthy, but one's demise does not erase one's sins, even temporarily until they are buried, as you seem to suggest.
"no gods, no masters" --m. sanger