EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- Obama Cans Regulator Who Crossed Wall Street
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
Popular content
Today's Top News
Arizona School District Wipes Latino American History Off the Map
A catastrophe in slow motion has played out in Arizona schools over the last several years as anti-immigrant sentiment crept into state legislation guiding how and what kind of Mexican American and indigenous history could be taught in classrooms across the southwestern border state. What may have seemed absurd until recently is now a reality as boxes of banned books will now be gathered up and locked away.
UPDATED on 1/18/12: Jeff Biggers updates his previous reporting after the Tuscon Unified School District responded to various reports of books being banned in Arizona schools:
In a clarification of last Friday’s announcement of a list of Mexican American Studies books to “be cleared from all classrooms” in order to comply with a state ban on ethnic studies, the Tucson Unified School District (TUSD) declared Tuesday that it ”has not banned any books as has been widely and incorrectly reported.”
But, Biggers continues, opponents were not satisfied with TUSD's explanation:
The TUSD statement “lacks accuracy and represents a thinly veiled attempt to cover up with distortions what is happening,” said Richard Martinez, the lead attorney on behalf of teachers and students challenging the ban in federal court. “Pandora’s box has been opened and the ugly face of the bigoted right wing has been exposed for what it is: an attempt to keep Latinos, poor, dumb and abused.”
Whether the removal of the books from all classrooms should be considered an outright ban or a possibly temporary prohibition brought little comfort to supporters of Tucson’s Mexican American Studies program, who sponsored an emotional community forum last Saturday with students and teachers who had witnessed the forced removal of the books from their classrooms.
UPDATE: Amy Goodman hosted a spirited debate between Huppenthal and Martinez on Wednesday's Democracy Now!:
Jeff Biggers, who has covered the ethnic studies ban in Arizona extensively, reported at Salon:
As part of the state-mandated termination of its ethnic studies program, the Tucson Unified School District released an initial list of books to be banned from its schools today. According to district spokeperson Cara Rene, the books “will be cleared from all classrooms, boxed up and sent to the Textbook Depository for storage.”
Facing a multimillion-dollar penalty in state funds, the governing board of Tucson’s largest school district officially ended the 13-year-old program on Tuesday in an attempt to come into compliance with the controversial state ban on the teaching of ethnic studies.
This is the list of textbooks cleared from the classrooms, according to KGUN 9 in Tuscon:
Critical Race Theory– Richard Delgado
500 Years of Chicano History in Pictures – edited by Elizabeth Martinez
Message to AZTLAN – Rodolfo Corky Gonzales
Chicano! The History of the Mexican Civil Rights Movement – Arturo Rosales
Occupied America: A History of Chicanos – Rodolfo Acuna
Pedagogy of the Oppressed – Paulo Freire
Rethinking Columbus: The next 500 Years – Bill BigelowThe list of removed books includes the 20-year-old textbook “Rethinking Columbus: The Next 500 Years,” which features an essay by Tucson author Leslie Silko. Recipient of a Native Writers’ Circle of the Americas Lifetime Achievement Award and a MacArthur Foundation genius grant, Silko has been an outspoken supporter of the ethnic studies program.
Bill Bigelow, editor of the now banned Rethinking Columbus and of the magazine and website Rethinking Schools, had this to say about the decision:
“By ordering teachers to remove ‘Rethinking Columbus,’ the Tucson school district has shown tremendous disrespect for teachers and students. This is a book that has sold over 300,000 copies and is used in school districts from Anchorage to Atlanta, and from Portland, Oregon to Portland, Maine. It offers teaching strategies and readings that teachers can use to help students think about the perspectives that are too often silenced in the traditional curriculum.”
Indian Country News explains:
Arizona’s state ban on ethnic studies—in HB 2281—took effect January 1, and states that no classes can be taught that “promote the overthrow of the United States government; promote resentment toward a race or class of people; are designed primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group; advocate ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals.”
The Arizona Department of Education can withhold 10 percent of a district’s state funding if it is found in violation of HB 2281. That provision put $15 million of state funding for TUSD in danger.
State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne pushed for the passage of HB 2281 and has been criticizing ethnic studies programs in Tucson for years.
And Rodolfo Acuña, writing at Culture Strike, remarks:
Arizona schools have abandoned its mission to educate students; they have intentionally denied Mexican American students access to knowledge. Consequently the Arizona bureaucracy has deliberately kept them in the fields, the mines and the prisons, hoping to deny them alternatives.
The Tucson Unified School District has not only banned its Mexican American Studies program, but has now banned a number of ethnic books from its curriculum. (Image: Thinkstock)
The purpose of critical thinking is to give students alternatives and to dispel myths and repel blind allegiance to those who deny them alternatives.
According to the late Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, “Censorship reflects society’s lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime.”
The motivation of the TUSD Trustees cannot be explained in terms of greed alone. It cannot be rationalized by culture alone. Money and personal gain play a role.
And explains his book, his teaching philosophy in the following video:
And, Biggers notes:
In a school district founded by a Mexican-American in which more than 60 percent of the students come from Mexican-American backgrounds, the administration also removed every textbook dealing with Mexican-American history, including “Chicano!: The History of the Mexican Civil Rights Movement” by Arturo Rosales, which features a biography of longtime Tucson educator Salomon Baldenegro. Other books removed from the school include “500 Years of Chicano History in Pictures,” by Elizabeth Martinez and the textbook “Critical Race Theory” by scholars Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic.
###
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...




84 Comments so far
Show AllYou mean anti-ILLEGAL- immigrant sentiment. You can't have this discussion without making the split between legal immigrants and illegal aliens.
Some how I doubt that, and what you're saying is just pure racism on your part, flying under the banner of loathe for illegal immigrants. Illegal immigrants are a subject that has nothing to do with those history books.
I do not have the list, but apparently one of the banned books is The Tempest, by William Shakespeare. I suspect that the book is banned because of the perspectives that such reading might give students on Eurocentrism, white supremacy, colonialism, and that sort of thing.
Does anyone care to dig in and explain how the division that John Shade is proposing would relate to the banning of this particular title?
Small Update: so far, the list shows one English author who quit writing in the 1600's and a lot of Native Americans. Can anyone provide a more complete list than what I have posted below?
Maybe you are not from that area, but the average Latino/a of New Mexico, Colorado, Arizona, Nevada, and California have roots and traditions far deeper in these regions than the gringo invaders from the east driven out there by their Kerouac books, James Dean movies, and Beech Boy/Eagles/Doobie Brothers tunes.
The Native Americans were there well before you were and your racists leaders are stamping out their words too.
I can only guess you're a republican or a republican flying under the radar as 3rd party.
"Let me give you a hint about the culture that you obviously know nothing about; they're masters at deceit and they let you see exactly what they want you to see."
This comment undermines the legitimacy of all of your anti-immigrant rants. Clearly you are only interested in promoting racist ideas.
Almost all immigrant rights supporters seek no more than due process for immigrants, and that the Bill of Rights protections and Habeas Corpus not be denied.
The real scofflaws are the government officials, and people such as yourself. You don't care about the law. When you call other people "illegal" you are projecting your own contempt for the law and for human rights onto them.
Hearings and due process determine legality. That starts with probable cause, and with the rights of the accused, and is followed by the right to a hearing and a trial.
Even with massive fishing expedition roundups - all illegal by the government, which admits to 800,000 people illegally and un-Constitutionally arrested and detained - a tiny fraction have actually been prosecuted or deported.
If we set up a roadblock in your town, and simply arrested and detained everyone, holding them all until the police were done with them, there would, of course, be a certain number of people found to be wanted for various things. There would be a higher percentage guilty of crimes, actually, then the immigrant dragnets have found. That is because immigrants are already under intense pressure and persecution, and are therefore more careful about breaking the law than citizens are.
What you are advocating is a system of "guilty until proven innocent," with wide discretionary power given to agents of the state and a complete trashing of all human rights and the US Constitution and international law. You are advocating a police state, and you are encouraging and applauding law breaking.
You mean anti-ILLEGAL- immigrant sentiment. You can't have this discussion without making the split between legal immigrants and illegal aliens.
when David Frost asked junior w. bush who he had locked up in GITMO, the answer was "illegal noncombatants."
Well, you are wrong. People here illegally are called "illegal aliens", that is what the law calls them. That is what 99% of Americans call them. What you call them is your call of course, but you are sort of marking yourself as irrational when you do so.
Very few of the people opposing the crackdowns on immigrants have any problem whatsoever with immigrants receiving due process, and then being required to abide by the law. The problem here is that due process is being denied - the government is violating the law, not to mention shredding the Bill of Rights.
This "split" that you wish us to believe exists is a figment of your imagination, based on an illogical thought process as I point out above, and is simply clever cover for disguising the true motives and agenda of the anti-immigrant movement and to deceive people about that.
The well-funded and orchestrated extreme right wing and racist movement fanning the flames of anti-immigrant hatred, and without which there would be no national hysteria about this issue, states quite clearly that this is all about keeping America white and suppressing people of color.
Onee wonders if all references to the US role in WW2 will be removed. After all is not the teaching of "Peerl Harbor" (that day of infamy) teaching resentment against the Japanese? Even today we have people on THESE boards who claim the "Japs got wheat they deserved wheen we nuked them".
What of the Nazis and Adolf Hitler? Will textbooks no longer mention "brave US soldiers ending the tyranny in Europe". No more of that "Greatest generation" crap might be a relief. What of books on Stalin and "CommunisM".? What of books referencing 9/11 or of mentioning Islam?
There is a heck of a lot more resentment exhibited towards Hispanics and Muslims in the United States of America then there is against those poor beleagured whites.
It very clear this has nothing to do with treating peoples as indviduals and much more to do with preserving the MYTH of the Superiority of the White American male and concealing the fact that so many of the "Heroes of History" were little more then racist Thugs who whould have been right at home In Hitlers Germany.
"As part of the state-mandated termination of its ethnic studies program, the Tucson Unified School District released an initial list of books to be banned from its schools today. "
Arizona makes a racist move to edit history books, thus making an American history book entry for racism. ... That they will probably need to remove because it's immigrant history, thus making another history book entry for racism. That they will probably need to remove because it's immigrant history, thus making another history book entry for racism...
The USA did not honor that treaty., They not only began driving the Mexicans over the border , they refused to recognize land claims by the same and refused to grant citizenship rights to those that wished to remain.In California as example they took up arms killing Mexicans and refused to recognize the rights of peoples with land grants.(much like they ignored treaties signed with the Native tribes when gold discovered in placed like North Dakota)
The USA failed to live up to its obligations under that treaty from the very first and much of those territories LEGALLY belong to Mexicans and their descendants. All Land grants made to Mexicans to persons were to be honored in perpetuity as legal to persons so awarded and their descendants. This too was ignored by the new US Government.
Given that hald of the territory of the Continental USA under legal readings of various treaties signed are in fact LEGAL territories of Native Americans, I find it absurd you would cite the treaty signed with Mexico as the basis of your argument thart migrants to those areas are "illegal"
We also need to see that it is published where people in Arizona, particularly, can get to it.
I have not found a complete list. Here are a few titles.
“Rethinking Columbus,” Inlcuding the following: -
- Leslie Marmon Silko
- Leonard Peltier
- Rigoberta Menchu.
- Suzan Shown Harjo’s “We Have No Reason to Celebrate”
- Buffy Sainte-Marie’s “My Country, ‘Tis of Thy People You’re Dying”
- Joseph Bruchac’s “A Friend of the Indians”
- Cornel Pewewardy’s “A Barbie-Doll Pocahontas”
N. Scott Momaday’s “The Delight Song of Tsoai-Talee”
- Michael Dorris’s “Why I’m Not Thankful for Thanksgiving”
- Leslie Marmon’s “Ceremony”
- Wendy Rose’s “Three Thousand Dollar Death Song”
- Winona LaDuke’s “To the Women of the World: Our Future, Our Responsibility”
The Tempest, by William Shakespeare Pedagogy of the Oppressed” by Paolo Freire Occupied America: A History of Chicanos by Rodolfo Acuña
I can't vouch for its accuracy, but except that its link to a .pdf "Curriculum Audit" didn't work for me, it looks OK.
Here's a working link to the audit that includes the reading list (see appendix).