Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Occupy Boston: Smart, Savvy, and Aiming to Emulate Wall Street Protests
About 200 people in Boston express their outrage at America's economic woes – and promise to take up the protest baton
There were socialists, anti-poverty campaigners, students, anarchists, computer hackers, the unemployed, and workers ranging from a vet to an accountant.
And, numbering around 200 and meeting to plot until late in the night, a group of Bostonians have decided to recreate the anti-Wall Street protests that are gripping New York.
Unlike previous attempts, such as a march that fizzled out in Chicago with just 20 people, the people behind Occupy Boston showed a strong dose of media savvy and organizational skill on Monday night, as they drew a committed crowd of volunteers to their cause: to occupy a slice of the city. Local TV crews were in attendance at the evening mass planning meeting, and it had been flagged on the front pages of Boston's newspapers.
The move raises the first serious prospect of the Wall Street protests spreading beyond New York and comes as other events are also being planned in Los Angeles and Washington.
The crowd of Bostonians listened and spoke about their anger at the ills in the capitalist system in general and the financial industry in particular.
Gathering in the center of Boston Common, in the heart of the city, they heard various speakers promise to copy the New York protests. "Tonight we begin to show the world how to live in freedom and peace. Right here, right now, a new life is starting," said Marissa Egerstrom, one of the organizing forces behind Occupy Boston.
Those were big words to say in front of just 200 people. But Occupy Boston aims to emulate Occupy Wall Street protesters, whose seizure of a downtown Manhattan park was first ignored by most of the media but has now generated headlines around the world, especially after police used pepper spray against peaceful women demonstrators.
Many of those gathered on the Common, including nearly all the key organizers, had been to New York to witness the protests. One organizer, Matthew Krawitz, who brought his two daughters to the Common, had been in Manhattan for the first day of the protests there. Now the unemployed IT expert was helping set up something similar in Boston. "I'm here to give them a better future," he said, referring to his two children.
In style and substance, Occupy Boston closely followed that of Occupy Wall Street, which was itself inspired by recent social movements in Spain and Arab countries. After the speeches different tactical groups were formed – covering everything from legal affairs to food to medical to media outreach – to prepare for the coming occupation.
Potential sites to be occupied included the Common itself and Dewey Square in Boston's financial district. Potential dates were also picked, with some as soon as this coming weekend. The separate groups operated in a "leaderless" style that dragged on in often circular debates but were impressive for eventually coming to collective agreement.
The meetings lasted for several hours in the park, as crowds listened to rabble-rousing speeches and critiques of capitalism. It promised a striking protest to come, but at times offered an incongruous vision of Boston. Ringing the common where the protesters met are some of the most upmarket streets in the city, lined with million-dollar townhouses. And on the park itself, virtually next door to where scores of people talked of forcefully bringing down American capitalism, fellow Bostonians enjoyed games of tennis on brightly lit late-night courts, seemingly oblivious to what was going on in the darkness just 50 yards away.
But what was never in doubt among the disparate participants was a sense of outrage and injustice at America's current economic woes. Bob Norkus, 54, had been out of work for a year. He has one simple desire. "Things need to be realigned. It's 99 percent of us versus one percent of them. This is still a democracy if we care to grab it," he said.
There were people with jobs in the crowd, too, and they were equally angry. Cynthia Brennan, 41, is a veterinary nurse. She had been inspired to come to the common by watching the popular revolts of the Arab Spring. "I was fascinated by Egypt. I was in front of al-Jazeera all the time. It needs to happen here," she said.
Local government accountant Tim Larkin, 28, agreed. But he wanted to improve on the New York protests in Boston. "We have to be better than New York and have a stronger set of demands," he said.
- Posted in

59 Comments so far
Show AllLet's hope these seeds fall on fallow ground.
Yes, Matthew Krawitz is not just participating to give his daughters "a better future", he and his fellow organizers are showing the world what REAL American patriotism looks like, and are doing this to give ALL OF US "a better future".
I assume you mean "fertile" ground.
If I was still living near Boston I would definitely be there!
People thinking and planning... this ain't no Texas Tea Party.
HAHAHA!!! Jimmy, you said it brother. I think it's about time that Amerika got a good look at a real "populists" movement. Not a bunch of rubes pushing a corprate agenda that will only make their lives worst.
KEEP THE AMERICAN AUTUMN MOVEMENT GOING...
No Compromise - Never give up one inch - No Justice, No Peace...
A couple hundred here and a couple hundred there. Soon it will add up to thousands and they won't be able to ignore it any longer!
I'm hoping, John Shade, that you're right. Of course I'm naive to do so, as some posters here would point out: we're all going to hell in a handbasket, and there is no hope.It's the lefty version of "end times", and I think it sucks.
This is exactly what the Elite fear. The common man and woman losing our fear of them.
But if you think this is going to be peaceful or bloodless, I heartily urge you to think again.
When these psychopaths are pushed against their gated community walls, they have a documented tendency to order their uniformed goons to shoot to kill.
Another Boston massacre leading to another Revolution. Ironically, it will be against the SAME ENEMY; city-of-london's remaining colonies-in-thrall; wallstreet & the "boston vault", the remnants of the old brit empire, now trans-national and as always, anti-people, its' banking interests and their corporate "TRADING COMPANY" cohorts. Amazing deja vu.
"Unlike previous attempts, such as a march that fizzled out in Chicago with just 20 people" This is completely unture OccupyChicago has been camped out in front of the Federal Reserve Bank 24/7 since last Friday night. I spent half the day yesterday standing in the rain with them and they aren't going anywhere. Come on down and show your support anyone living in the Chicago area.
Thank You, from a guy in Florida!
From the front lines in New York, I wish you well.
what is the point?to encourage the country to cut down on energy use?to clean up toxic waste sites?to discuss Fukushima?to abandon private property?to stop making drones?
what?
jobs? manufacturing? mortgage relief?
precisely what changes to the status quo, besides tax rate adjustments, are we talking about?what changes not requiring acts of the joke we call congress?giving up our cars and cell phones?
from the article:
~ Local government accountant Tim Larkin, 28, agreed. But he wanted to improve on the New York protests in Boston. "We have to be better than New York and have a stronger set of demands," he said. ~
yes, that would be good...on the other hand, the fact that you understand you are 'demanding' should tell you much...if one has only 'demand' in their tool kit, well...
a demand is really just a wish with emphasis...
you know what happens when you wish in one hand, and shit in the other...
unless there is a threat to back up the demand, then it becomes an 'ultimatum'...
are you making demands, or ultimatums? what is the threat?
What "threat" are you proposing?
my only threat is a unanimous, global abandoning of property-based life, but I doubt this is theirs, which is why I ask, since they're not saying...
my threat is not the one in question, as I've been open about my idea for quite some time, and received a fair amount of insult and ridicule in return, not that I give it much weight...you've been here a while, Jim...is this the first time you've read me suggesting such? in case it is, I've eve gone so far as to suggest a specific day: September 22, 2012...
I'm simply wondering what these people have as their goal...do you know?why don't they say? a 'better life'? what does that mean? via what strategies or tactics?
Well I don't think everyone is going to unanamously abandon private property including you and your private property and what is your threat if everyone does not abandon their private property?
But if you read the article they are open to many demands and many of your ideas would be welcome... they are open to lots of ideas including those of Socialists.
Making threats does not work and what threat are you making about Sept 22nd, next year and why would these two events not be in harmony?
Why put off for a year when you can be demonstrating for your ideas now.
"What Does a better life mean?"
That is for everyone to think about before makin threats.
Empty threats just make those who threaten look helpless and ridiculous.
even though I think it is the only hope we have to save this world, I don't think everyone will abandon private property, either, until things get worse...
if anything is certain, based on current trends, it is that they will...
my hope is that the bad things will happen just quickly enough, but not quite so devastating as to be beyond recovery, that people wake up in time...
Fukushima, however, has changed everything...all biological bets are off, now...
obviously, I differ from most of you, not only in how critical we think the situation is, but in what will be required to deal with it...
life is like that...for now...
To throw the shit that is in the other hand?!
dubet, like you I favor the abolition of capitalism and transition over to democratic ecosocialism. I would only suggest to you that it is not possible for the protesters to be any more unified and together now than they are--given the US media, given the lack of political awareness in the US generally, given decades of COINTELPRO type tactics against the left, etc. etc.
I think Glenn Greenwald's article today is well worth reading. Some snippets from it:
Some of these critiques [of the protesters] are ludicrous. Does anyone really not know what the basic message is of this protest: that Wall Street is oozing corruption and criminality and its unrestrained political power -- in the form of crony capitalism and ownership of political institutions -- is destroying financial security for everyone else? Beyond that, criticizing protesters for the prominence of police brutality stories is pure victim-blaming (and, independently, having police brutality highlighted is its own benefit).
Most importantly, very few protest movements enjoy perfect clarity about tactics or command widespread support when they begin; they're designed to spark conversation, raise awareness, attract others to the cause, and build those structural planks as they grow and develop. Dismissing these incipient protests because they lack fully developed, sophisticated professionalization is akin to pronouncing a three-year-old child worthless because he can't read Schopenhauer: those who are actually interested in helping it develop will work toward improving those deficiencies, not harp on them in order to belittle its worth.
That said, some of these organizational/tactical critiques are valid enough as far as they go; the protests could probably be more effective with some more imaginative, concerted and savvy organizational strategies. The problem is these criticisms don't go very far -- at all.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/09/28-9
Perhaps the occupy actions around the country could consider adopting the seven demands of the October2011 action in DC at http://october2011.org. A great deal of thought and debate went into these and they're pretty comprehensive:
Tax the rich and corporations.
End the wars, bring the troops home, cut military spending.
Protect the social safety net, strengthen Social Security and improved Medicare for all
End corporate welfare for oil companies and other big business interests.
Transition to a clean energy economy, reverse environmental degradation.
Protect worker rights including collective bargaining, create jobs and raise wages.
Get money out of politics.
cpapermaster, I'm all for those demands. Some could be made more specific, like "mandate publicly funded elections for all federal offices"--because how else are you going to "get money out of politics"? I would hope there is some specificity behind some of the others, as I would not be happy with some cut of a mere $60 billion from the bloated military budget, for example. We need to simply end the Empire, close the 800+ bases around the world and start taking care of the American people. We are also going to need a Truth Commission with a number of special prosecutors and very large staff to investigate the many crimes that have gone uninvestigated for 10+ years. (Stolen elections, lies to justify the Iraq war, 9/11, the sub-prime mortgage fiasco, the bailout, etc.) We cannot just continue with allowing the corporate media and the criminal class in DC to brush all these crimes under the rug--not if we want to live in a real democracy.
Memory_Hole, like you, I was concerned about Glenn's specific comment that,
"Does anyone really not know what the basic message is of this protest: that Wall Street is oozing corruption and criminality and its unrestrained political power -- in the form of crony capitalism and ownership of political institutions -- is destroying financial security for everyone else?"
And I have been consistently concerned about the issue of 'the primary demand' of the Occupy Wall Street action, despite my full support and enthusiasm for Occupy WS as a wonderful and very creative first step in "The Coming Insurrection" and potential to be the spark that finally lights a long essential conflagration of the long-over-due revolution "Against Empire" [Parenti].
I am also concerned about the tactical, learning, and PR language 'message' that this wonderful kick-off movement engenders in all Americans.
Thus like Glenn, and as you quote above, I am highly focused on the fact that, "very few protest movements enjoy perfect clarity about tactics or command widespread support when they begin; they're designed to spark conversation, raise awareness, attract others to the cause, and build those structural planks as they grow and develop."
"Clarity" in the message in "sparking conversations" and "attracting others" to a valid cause is very, very important to me, and should be to this nascient revolution --- which makes it essential that the message of the primary demand be first accurate, but also understandable and attractive to a wide audience.
Thus I sent the following reply comment to "Salon" (which I should have posted as a CD comment also), and which I have sent variations of to the Occupy 'General Assembly':
"I hope that my comments are constructive regarding going further on demands.
As article says, "who doesn't know that Wall Street is at fault", but behind the visible Wall Street is the invisible global corporate/financial/militarist Empire, which has captured our former country by hiding behind the facade of its bought and owned TWO-Party modern "Vichy" sham of faux-democracy -- just as the Nazi Empire tried to hide behind its phony, single-party "Vichy" French government c.1940."
Memory_Hole, from the tactical, conversational, awareness, and attracting others standpoints that Glenn, you, and I clearly share, it is not fully helpful for this admittedly innovative Occupy Wall Street revolution spark movement to focus too exclusively on the term 'capitalism' as the seminal enemy of the people --- despite the FACT that financial capitalism as practiced on Wall Street (particularly related to the 2008 looting of some $17T) has certainly been the most notable and anger inducing 'symptom' of what is wrong with the American-style gangster capitalism.
The primary 'message', 'discourse', 'learning', and 'attracting' limits of focusing too heavily on this most monster-like 'symptom problem' is that the vast majority of Americans, because their minds have been programmed as such, will automatically associate being against capitalism as being for communism --- and this will cause both a limiting of attracting sufficient followers for a full Second American Revolution, and, more DANGEROUSLY, providing the underlying but still hidden and undiagnosed casual Empire behind all the 'symptom problems' of; Wall Street, finance capitalism, looting, imperialist wars, environmental destruction, domestic spying and lying, political deceit of both 'Vichy' facade parties, etc. etc. to continue to be unexposed, unrecognized, unlearned, invisible, and unconfronted as the causal core hidden cancerous tumor of Empire that is at the heart of all such surface level "symptom problems".
For this Occupy Wall Street and next weeks Washington protest movements to really be the spark of a revolution that can grow to encompass all Americans --- the 99%, as they rightly say --- the only sufficiently broad and innately understandable/acceptable villain pathology that will be understood and emotionally acceptable to all the 99% of Americans will be EMPIRE, not merely capitalism.
Americans are all innately conditioned by their very American-ness, and very history to hate Empire, and love democracy and liberty.
Both historically, from our founding fathers against the oppression of the British Empire, to our real fathers (if you are my age) against the fascist pathology of the 20th century Nazi Empire, Imperialist Japan, and the Soviet Empire, most Americans are conditioned to hate Empires, while they have been counter-conditioned, admittedly by deceitful and overbearing TV propaganda, to not think badly of capitalism.
This reality of the state of the American mind strongly suggests that any attempt to engender the necessary level of mass support for a Second American Revolution against anything would be wise to make the target and first demand to be to be "Against Empire", and that a very great concomitant danger of mass backlash, would be to try to start a revolution against 'capitalism' --- which could be easily perverted by corporatist media as being a revolution for communism, and result in massive violence.
However, once "The Coming Insurrection", the Revolution "Against Empire" is lit, and that "discourse", "learning", and 'attraction" of supporters is successful "Against Empire", then the probability of educating and changing the American mind about the destructive aspects of uncontrolled and destructive 'finance capitalism', rapacious 'corporatism', complicit and 'captured government', and other varied socio-political, militarist geostrategy, and political-economic pathologies, all of which operated under the vale of a disguised Empire which has been vanquished from our country and world, can then be advanced in peaceful and reflective sanity.
The 'symptom problems', such as an insane Wall Street, untold wars, vast economic inequality, environmental destruction, etc., etc. can all be peacefully resolved once the prime demand of 'calling-out', belling, exposing, and confronting the Empire has been addressed by a broadly supported and NON-violent revolution aimed first at being "Against Empire" itself.
Thanks for your understanding and support,
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
Liberty & democracy
over
violent/'Vichy'
empire
New America People's Party 2012 --- our last chance "Against Empire"
Alan, thanks for your comment. I am in complete agreement with you that Empire is, from a strategic standpoint, a better thing to rally against than Capitalism, and that the former will attract many more to our cause than the latter.
True. Capitalism (small "c"), merely means the accumulation of capital. There is an extremely broad variety of ways that this can be done. An illustration: I have an aquaintance. He is a "blue collar" genius. He is a "master woodwright". He is essentially a tool & die technician (ie. making the designs & forms to make the tools/machines, to make the desired artifact). He has aquired over a hundred thousand dollars worth of tools & machines in his in-house workshop ("capital"). He has another 30-40 thousand dollars worth of handtools & powertools ("capital") in his work van (more "capital"). He's self-employed. He is a capitalist by broad definition, but cannot be compared to those IMPERIAL crime syndicates operating on wallstreet, "boston vault", city-of-london, and other similar financial districts around the world (ALL in collusion with one another; a global empire). Furthermore, the rally-against-empire is actually, IRONICALLY, confronting the SAME enemy as we confronted in our first revolutionary war : the DESCENDANTS of the british (east india TRADING COMPANY) empire (run out of "city-of-london" financial district). The empire is now transnational, or para-national, spead out amongst MANY financial districts, and still as anti-human as ever.
dubet.....exactly what I was thinking.......what is it that we are protesting/revolting for...... we need to change the whole system, not just one or two aspects of it....... everything that effect the environment.......effects or economy, visa versa....... we need to KNOW exactly what we want to CREATE........lay it down and then figure a path to get there.....It's complicated......but we can do it IF we have the right goals, the specific goals in mind......then we can lay down the blue print on how to do it......so that people are not left out in the cold, even if they have no money, or not enough or if they have a disablity or what ever........ in the GREAT CHANGE ........the logistics and adaptations to a different lifestyle will need to DELICATELY BALANCED....... hell it might even mean REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH....
How about the simple demand that our government be accountable to the people and not the corporations?
The threat is that more and more will join, more and more cities will be "occupied", and the public will become informed and support the movement. 45 years ago we did not have a corporate media and America learned that people were starving to death in our country. They demanded and got action - food stamps. The public was appalled that 4 little girls were blown up in a church bombing and horrified to see police dogs set on peaceful marchers and we got The Civil Rights Act.xxxx
People keep saying we have to take to the streets. Well, that is what is happening. Of course it starts small, all movements do. But if it grows... xxxx
So this news is very exciting to me. We may be witnessing and hopefully participating in the birth of a revolution. And it started with an Arab Spring.xxxx Still no paragraphs. Will commonDreams ever get it right??
One of the problems with a "revolution" is that it will more and likely turn into a civil war. You have left and right wingers saying "MY TEAM IS RIGHT!"
This separation between the populist is spawned and generated by MSM. FOXNEWS against CNN viewers.
In a revolution, there needs to be people channeling the masses that are on the frontline. I don't see this happening. There is a huge disconnect from those at Wall Street protesting and those that may root them on.
Be aware of what you wish for. If this does bloom into something bigger, we have to do some serious organization and directing. The corporate media/gov't has us right where they want us. They have us divided and we will fall if that remains the case. The Gov't will declare marshall law and retinal scans for all directed by BlackWater.
dogone.......I agree... chaos will not be a good thing.....this is why I made my earlier post.....a plan....stating specifically what we want to work on....NOW.... so that people are also educated...aware, deeply aware of the issues ...... the ones facing us... with a VERY SERIOUS PLAN ON HOW TO SWITCH OVER TO A DIFFERENT LIFE STYLE..... MUCH LESS ENERGY INTENSIVE.... CLEANER.... AND MORE LOCALLY CENTERED.... FOR ALL OF US..... we have a long way to go..... and no matter what we plan it will be hard and many won't like it ....at first....but we must teach..... THE PROBLEMS ARE SYSTEMIC, FROM OUR CAPITALIST SYSTEM TO OUR ENVIRONMENTAL orientation...........
then a plan needs to be formalized now. No more talk. ACT!
If not, we are sunk! A system in which we face is mighty beyond most peoples comprehension. The propaganda machine is the first thing to overcome in my opinion. That may be the toughest task at hand.
The Media has orchestrated people so well that they pick a belief over their family or the own persons welfare. That is tough to compete against and REALITY.
I am all for a plan to be started. NOW. please no more talk folks. This may be our last chance to change the future to a healthy one.
doggone, it doesn't have to. I believe a great majority of Americans are not in favor of maintaining a US Empire with 800+ military bases around the globe and spending more on military expenditures than all other nations combined. That is why the corporate media never mentions this subject, because it is such an obvious elephant in the room. Most Americans, left and right, don't favor bailing out big banks while doing nothing for unemployed Americans. Most Americans, left and right, favor maintaining Social Security and Medicare. Most Americans, left and right, favor guaranteeing health care for all US citizens (though they may differ over Medicare for all). There is a lot that left and right can agree on. And the time is now to start forming consensus.
OK. But where do we go from here? How do you organize this and put it into action?
I propose people connect with the October2011.org folks and do whatever you can to support them. Ditto with OccupyWallStreet.org In some cases it means working issue by issue. There is a statewide group here in CA, Californians for Single Payer, that is working on that issue. As soon as I get some time I plan to help them. I heard on Norm what's-his-name's show that there will also be a petition drive in CA to modify Obamacare's implementation here to allow for a public option.
I have no Grand Plan for how to implement this. We have been marginalized by a system that is hostile to us. Progressives are systematically excluded from the mass media conversation. That is part of why street protests/occupations are so important: so We the People can get together and build consensus. We can use alternative media sites like this one, but consensus building cannot be done entirely via comment sections of progressive news sites.
You don't need a Grand Plan. Communication is the key. I'll check out the sites.
Peace
"How about the simple demand that our government be accountable to the people and not the corporations?"...............
.........YES I think that is one big one.how? start with 3 simple ones
.............-campaign finance reform
.......................-another might be 'bring our troops home' Slash the military budget
spend money on jobs for Americans rebuilding our infrastructure with-high speed rail, upgraded internet, electrical grid rebuild, etc etc.........................
lastly in order to help our poverty stricken with at least the beginnings of relief (besides jobs that is) Single payer health care......................
I think the poster above who asked for an end to property based living is way out of step with Americans. Let's begin our change with ones that are reality based.
way out of step with Americans?
yes, I am...
unfortunately...
reality is an interesting word...do you mean 'real' reality, or yours?
'real' reality contains large amounts of radioactivity blowing all over, which will adversely affect reproduction from now until forever...does yours? 'real' reality has a government that acts against your interests at every turn, and proudly invents hundreds of ways to kill or injure people, often in large numbers, and police that openly assault their charges with no consequence...does yours?'real' reality has factories churning out drones that will be launched to keep you and yours under thumb or fire, if not in prison...does yours?
'real' reality requires destroying and poisoning the planet, to the detriment of local populations and environs, to make every piece of the rail, and internet, and electrical grid, etc. that you mention...does yours, or does stuff just show up in the store by magic?
would you still want rail if it meant your entire neighborhood had to be destroyed to physically make it? no, you only want it because the horrors associated with making it are someone else's...
reality based? give me a break...
Rico's comment was to your demand for everyone to abandon their property, which is ridiculous so you defend your demand by a flurry of rhetorical questions that you should be glad that the Wall Street protestors would also understand.
It seems maybe you are disturbed that they are doing something now and not acting so superior like you because you picked a specific date to demonstrate a year from now.
The tactic you are pushing is called stalling for time.
why is abandoning property a ridiculous notion?what is happening in Fukushima, right now?property is being abandoned...in many cases, it will be for eons...why? in protest?
no, because it is no longer inhabitable...
because it is radioactive beyond belief...
wake up! your property, and your children, are next!
Radioactive nonsense.
Keep the OccupyBoston articles coming - glad to know that this is happening where I live.
Charles M. Young has some interviews and observations from the NY protest out at TCBH:
13 Ways To Look at the Occupation of Wall Street
@Aleph Null - Thanks for the informative link.
Occupy San Francisco starts Thursday 3:00 PM at 555 Montgomery Street. I think all these local actions need to become organizing centers - at least get the students maximially involved, then labor and antiwar groups and go from there.
New York... Boston... San Fran....
The call for freedom is spreading.
On to Washington... LA... New Orleans.... Tampa.... Detroit....
As Michael Moore said tonight: "WE are the MAJORITY! Not the people in the towers, not the heads of the Corporations! WE are the majority!"
MM? The MSM/Entertainers seeds are starting to spout. Get ready for this movement to disintegrate.
I live in Phoenix where I doubt this will happen but one can hope, right?
PLEASE: ALL OF YOU WHO UNDERSTAND THAT THE GREATEST THREAT TO THE FUNCTIONING OF OUR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY IS MONEY, GO TO: getmoneyout.com and sign the petition to amend the Constitution to prevent any politician from accepting money from any source to gain office or to remain in office...
or call 917 720 6888 to text your signature to this monumentally important move to amend the Constitution and prevent the large moneyed interests, Koch Brothers, et al, from continuing their unprecedented subversion of the democratic process in America.
Protesters on Wall Street, in Boston in Philadelphia, wherever, you inspire and offer hope that we can fight back against the criminals who brought down our economy
and damaged our well-being. Also, let's support the Dylan-Ratigan-Jimmy Willams constitutional amendment to take money out of politics. We nee d congresspeple who can't be BOUGHT.
"We nee d congresspeple who can't be BOUGHT"
Then you need to put the CEOs and other Corporate Elite in one of two places. In prison or in the ground. The choice is yours.