SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"This bill is an admission that a House Republican majority cannot govern," said Democratic Rep. Rosa DeLauro. "They would rather gamble on an intervening election than attempt to complete their work on time."
House Republicans plowed ahead Tuesday with a short-term government funding package that one leading Democratic lawmaker denounced as "a ploy to force the extreme Project 2025 manifesto agenda on the American people."
The GOP's stopgap continuing resolution, to which House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) attached a widely condemned voter suppression bill, would mostly fund the federal government at current levels for six months beyond the looming shutdown date of September 30, putting off the spending fight until after the 2024 elections.
Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, said Monday that instead of negotiating a bipartisan solution to the impasse over government funding, House Republicans "squandered an entire year by taking us down a partisan path and forcing us to waste time considering extreme funding bills based on [Republican presidential nominee Donald] Trump's Project 2025 they could not pass and that have no chance of becoming law."
DeLauro warned that instead of approving bipartisan government funding legislation ahead of the November elections, much of the House Republican caucus wants to delay negotiations until early next year, believing such a strategy "provides them with more leverage to force their unpopular cuts to services that American families depend on to make ends meet."
"They want to slash domestic investments in healthcare, education, job training, and every other discretionary program, which will hurt the middle class and the economy," said DeLauro. "This bill is an admission that a House Republican majority cannot govern. They would rather gamble on an intervening election than attempt to complete their work on time."
"Extreme MAGA Republicans have decided to abandon their commitment to the American people in order to enact Trump's Project 2025 agenda."
The GOP's legislative package narrowly cleared a procedural hurdle on Tuesday and is set for a final vote on Wednesday, but the legislation is likely doomed to fail amid united opposition from congressional Democrats and the White House and fractures in the Republican caucus.
As The New York Timesreported Tuesday, "Democrats and many Republicans prefer a shorter-term spending bill that would last into early December, allowing time to resolve their fiscal differences but leaving it to Mr. Biden and the current Congress—rather than the next president and Congress—to set funding levels for 2025 and beyond."
A detailed analysis released last week by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found that budget proposals released by House Republicans combined with the far-right policy changes outlined under the Project 2025 agenda—including steep cuts to critical social programs—would "create a harsher country with higher poverty and less opportunity."
In a letter to his caucus on Monday, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) wrote that "despite the existence of a previously agreed upon spending framework, extreme MAGA Republicans have decided to abandon their commitment to the American people in order to enact Trump's Project 2025 agenda."
"The partisan and extreme continuing resolution put forth by House Republicans is unserious and unacceptable," Jeffries continued. "In order to avert a GOP-driven government shutdown that will hurt everyday Americans, Congress must pass a short-term continuing resolution that will permit us to complete the appropriations process during this calendar year and is free of partisan policy changes inspired by Trump's Project 2025."
"Opponents of democracy are terrified that they will lose again at the ballot box in November and are rushing to right-wing judges to hamstring democratic governance," said one observer.
A Republican-appointed U.S. federal judge in Georgia raised eyebrows and objections Thursday after taking what observers called the "unprecedented" step of blocking a rule that hasn't even been finalized in order to stop the Biden administration from implementing a plan to deliver promised debt relief to millions of student borrowers.
U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Georgia James Randal Hall issued an order blocking the Biden administration's proposed federal student debt relief rule. Hall—an appointee of former President George W. Bush—granted a motion by a coalition of right-wing state attorneys general to preempt the rule's eventual implementation.
"The court is substituting its judgment for those elected to serve the public," American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten said in response to the ruling. "It subverts the democratic process and denies relief to student loan borrowers, many of whom rely on debt relief programs already advanced by the Biden-Harris administration."
"This court's unprecedented decision to block a rule that does not yet exist is not only bad for the 30 million borrowers who were relying on the administration to deliver much-needed relief," she continued. "It's a harbinger of the chaos and corruption right-wing judges seek to force on the American people."
Mike Pierce, executive director of the Student Borrower Protection Center—which called the ruling "dangerous and unprecedented"—denounced Hall for preventing the Biden administration from delivering student debt relief "even though no plan has been finalized."
"This is an extraordinary break with precedent and a brazen move by the conservative movement to shift even more power to unelected, unaccountable red-state judges," he said. "Opponents of democracy are terrified that they will lose again at the ballot box in November and are rushing to right-wing judges to hamstring democratic governance."
"This is the clearest sign yet that Project 2025 is already terrorizing student loan borrowers through a slow-moving judicial coup," Pierce added, referring to a conservative coalition's agenda for a far-right takeover of the federal government—which critics warn would worsen the U.S. student debt crisis.
Biden's proposal would forgive some or all student debt for around 30 million borrowers who have been repaying undergraduate loans for at least 20 years, or graduate loans for 25 years.
Hall's order is based on what he said was the plaintiffs' "substantial likelihood of success on the merits given the rule's lack of statutory authority" and U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona's "attempt to implement a rule contrary to normal procedures."
"This is especially true in light of the recent rulings across the country striking down similar federal student loan forgiveness plans," he added.
The U.S. Supreme Court's right-wing supermajority last year struck down Biden's initial plan to relieve up to $20,000 in federal scholastic debt for around 40 million borrowers, and last month the justices kept in place a sweeping suspension of the administration's Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) program, which aims to lower monthly repayments and hasten loan forgiveness.
"Behind these eye-popping budget numbers are millions of real people who will see health coverage, food assistance, and other forms of support taken away," said the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Taken together, budget proposals released by House Republicans and the far-right agenda outlined by the Trump-aligned Project 2025 initiative would "create a harsher country with higher poverty and less opportunity" while simultaneously delivering more tax cuts to the wealthiest people in the United States.
That's according to a
detailed analysis published Tuesday by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), which examines the House Republican Study Committee's (RSC) budget blueprint, the GOP House Budget Committee's (HBC) proposed budget, and the Project 2025 agenda crafted by dozens of right-wing organizations and former Trump administration officials.
Analyzing the three proposals in tandem "brings the implications of influential conservative policymakers' and a think tank's broader fiscal policy agenda into sharper focus," CBPP said Tuesday, explaining how—if enacted—the plans would slash critical social programs such as Medicaid and federal nutrition assistance, disinvest from public infrastructure and medical research, attack immigrants, and double down on "skewed, expensive, and ineffective tax cuts" for the rich.
The liberal think tank estimates that the three right-wing proposals would strip Medicaid coverage from tens of millions of people in the U.S., take early learning services from roughly 800,000 children, curb cash assistance for millions of seniors, and cut nutrition assistance for tens of millions of low-income families. Such proposed cuts are consistent with the budgets Republican nominee Donald Trump put forth during his first term in the White House.
"The RSC budget calls for cutting average Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits by about 22%," CBPP's new analysis observes. "This cut would affect 41 million people participating in SNAP."
"And Project 2025 calls for gutting summer food assistance programs that children in families with low incomes rely on when school is out, which could include the new Summer EBT program that is expected to provide grocery benefits to more than 21 million children this summer," CBPP added.
The think tank emphasized that "behind these eye-popping budget numbers are millions of real people who will see health coverage, food assistance, and other forms of support taken away."
"This will make it even harder for them to afford the basics, leading to serious hardships such as homelessness or overcrowded living, food insecurity, hunger, and untreated health conditions," the CBPP said.
While proposing funding cuts that would strip food aid, healthcare, and other programs from working-class people across the U.S., the three proposals align behind a tax agenda that would disproportionately benefit the wealthiest Americans, according to CBPP.
"For example, each agenda would double down on the 2017 tax cuts, whose core provisions are tilted heavily toward high-income households," the think tank said Tuesday. "The RSC budget calls for the continuation of all of the 2017 law’s individual income tax cuts and adds substantial tax cuts for corporations, wealthy shareholders, and large estates on top."
"Project 2025 goes further," CBPP added, "calling for a set of extreme near-term tax policies that would raise taxes on middle- and low-income households while cutting them for wealthy households, shareholders, and corporations."
Additionally, each of the three right-wing policy proposals calls for the elimination of an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) funding boost approved by congressional Democrats and President Joe Biden as part of the Inflation Reduction Act. The funding increase has allowed the IRS to collect over $1 billion in past-due taxes from the wealthy in the U.S., according to the agency.
CBPP's new analysis lends weight to Democrats' warnings that House Republicans have injected elements of the deeply unpopular Project 2025 agenda into key government funding fights in the lead-up to the November elections, in which control of the White House and Congress are at stake.
"It is also notable what is missing from these agendas," CBPP said Tuesday. "Despite rhetoric from some Republicans about the need to support families—and children in particular—these sweeping agendas do not call for new or increased investments to help families afford childcare or rent, to expand the Child Tax Credit, or to bolster the [Earned Income Tax Credit] for workers without children."
"And they do nothing," the analysis adds, "to ensure that all workers have access to paid family and medical leave so they can take time off to welcome a new child, attend to a health issue, or care for a family member who needs them."