EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Journalism Legend Daniel Schorr Dies at 93
Daniel Schorr, a longtime senior news analyst for NPR and a veteran Washington journalist who broke major stories at home and abroad during the Cold War and Watergate, has died. He was 93.
In a Sept. 16, 1976 photo, television reporter Daniel Schorr appears before a meeting of the House Ethics Committee in Washington. Veteran reporter-commentator Daniel Schorr, whose hard-hitting reporting for CBS got him on President Richard Nixon's notorious 'enemies list' in the 1970s, has died. He was 93. (AP Photo/Bob Daugherty) Schorr,
who once described himself as a "living history book," passed away
Friday morning at a Washington hospital. He was able to bring to
contemporary news commentary a deep sense of how governmental
institutions and players operate, as well as the perspective gained from
decades of watching history upfront.
"He could compare presidents from Eisenhower on through, and that gave him historical context for things," said Donald A. Ritchie, Senate historian and author of a book about the Washington press corps. "He had lived it, he had worked it and he had absorbed it. That added a layer to his broadcasting that was hard for somebody his junior to match."
Schorr's 20-year career as a foreign correspondent began in 1946. After serving in U.S. Army intelligence during World War II, he began writing from Western Europe for the Christian Science Monitor and later The New York Times, witnessing postwar reconstruction, the Marshall Plan and the creation of the NATO alliance.
Schorr joined CBS News in 1953 as one of "Murrow's boys," the celebrated news team put together by Edward R. Murrow. He reopened the network's Moscow bureau, which had been shuttered by Joseph Stalin in 1947. Ten years later, Schorr scored an exclusive broadcast interview with Nikita Khrushchev, the U.S.S.R. Communist Party chief - the first-ever with a Soviet leader. Schorr was barred from the U.S.S.R. later that year after repeatedly defying Soviet censors.
He covered the building of the Berlin Wall as CBS bureau chief for Germany and Western Europe. In 1962, he aired a celebrated portrait of citizens living under Communist rule in East Germany.He was reassigned to Washington in 1966. Other reporters in the bureau were already covering major institutions such as Congress or the State Department, so Schorr assigned himself to cover the implementation of President Johnson's Great Society programs.
"No one had such a beat," recalled his bureau colleague Roger Mudd. "He was everywhere. He had almost carte blanche to cover Washington."
David Broder, a longtime political reporter and columnist for The Washington Post, added: "I think he's unique in the sense that he's been at the center of so many different stories, both here in Washington and overseas, for so long. He kept his perspective so well and does not ever exaggerate what's taking place, but really let you know why it's important."
Becoming Part Of The Story
Schorr was surprised to find himself on the so-called Enemies List that had been drawn up by Richard Nixon's White House when he read it on the air. The list - naming hundreds of political opponents, entertainers and publications considered hostile to the administration - became the basis for one of the charges of impeachment against Nixon.
Schorr, along with some other members of the list, counted his inclusion on it as his greatest achievement.
Schorr won Emmys in each of the Watergate years of 1972, 1973 and 1974. Over the course of his long career, he was honored with numerous other decorations and awards, including a Peabody for "a lifetime of uncompromising reporting of the highest integrity." Schorr was inducted into the Hall of Fame of the Society of Professional Journalists.
"He was sophisticated about the government and how it works," Mudd said. "He was a damned vacuum cleaner, is what he was."
'Killer Schorr'
In 1975, Schorr reported on assassinations that had been carried out by the CIA. "The anger of the administration can be gauged from Richard Helms' denunciation of Schorr," historian Garry Wills recounts in his 2010 book, Bomb Power.
Helms, then the CIA director, confronted Schorr in the presence of other reporters at the White House, calling him names such as "son of a bitch" and "killer."
"Killer Schorr: That's what they ought to call you," Helms said.
In 1976, Schorr reported on the findings of the Pike Committee, which had investigated illegal CIA and FBI activities. The committee had voted to keep its final report secret, but Schorr leaked a copy to the Village Voice, which published it.
Schorr was threatened with a $100,000 fine and jail time for contempt of Congress. But during congressional testimony, Schorr refused to identify his source, citing First Amendment protections. The House ethics committee voted 6 to 5 against a contempt citation.
But CBS had already taken Schorr off the air. He ultimately resigned from the network that year.
"CBS found that, like other big corporations, it did not like to offend the Congress," Mudd said. "He broke his ties to CBS and before they could fire him, he resigned."
An Enduring Career
In 1979, Schorr was hired to provide commentary for the fledgling CNN. The network inaugurated its programming the following year with his interview with President Jimmy Carter. But in 1985, his contract was not renewed, which Schorr counted as his second "firing."
"Schorr was always a person to challenge what the government was saying and being skeptical and contrary," said Ritchie, the Senate historian.
"It really is true that I would sometimes stand up for principle at the risk of my job," he told his son Jonathan for an interview on NPR's Weekend Edition last year. "It is also true that when I lose my job I get terribly nervous."
Upon leaving CNN, Schorr joined NPR, where he had been doing occasional commentaries for several years. He had been a senior news analyst for NPR ever since. He also wrote a column for the Christian Science Monitor for decades.
"What passes for commentary today is almost all opinion," Ritchie said, "but Schorr was part of that breed of commentators who dug up information before they pontificated about it."
Schorr was born in the Bronx in 1916, the son of Belorussian immigrants. He got his first scoop at age 12, when he saw the body of a woman who had jumped or fallen from the roof of his apartment building. He called the police - and the Bronx Home News, which paid him $5 for the information.
"It was the first time I'd ever seen a dead person in my life," he told NPR's Robert Siegel in a 2006 interview on All Things Considered marking Schorr's 90th birthday.
"Why didn't I react more emotionally to that? It was the essential journalist who manages to absent himself from the situation and simply report it without feeling it," Schorr said.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

32 Comments so far
Show AllGodspeed, Daniel Schorr. And if you're given the choice to come back here for another go at it - tell 'em thanks but no thanks.
Meanwhile, Cheesedick Cheney lives on.
i don't have any heroes but there are a number of people i really admire and daniel shorr is one of them...more reporters/journalists should take his lead....
I loved listening to this man's voice.
He was accused of being contemptuous by those who were truly contemptuous.
I suspect the vote would less favorable today.
Try this: "He was accused of being contemptuous by those who were truly contemptible."
q
Daniel Schorr always offered the bite of wisdom on NPR often at odds with toothless nonquestioning NPR reactions to federal government policy.
What a great journalist and a wonderful gentleman. Woodward & Bernstein couldn't hold the man's notepad. I'll miss his droll sense of humor when trying to " objectively " discuss the skunks at the picnic: he covered all the stinkiest ones, too. God's speed, sir.
I wish I could participate in the accolades, and maybe if I'd been born before 1961 I could. But I didn't become aware of Daniel Schorr until the late 80s.
For the last 25 years, I was almost always disappointed by his commentaries for NPR, which contained nothing but platitudes and conventional msm wisdoms.
I lost respect for his judgment at a particular point in the first gulf war. U.S. forces had been accused of having bombed an Iraqi school. They predictably denied it. Schorr was asked for his opinion. He had no firsthand information but remarked, without apparent irony or sarcasm, that he couldn't believe that our country's military officials would misrepresent the truth on such a matter.
It seems as if the man may have been a true gadfly journalist at one point -- afflicting the comfortable and comforting the afflicted -- but for the last few decades of his life, he struck me as someone coasting on a reputation no longer earned.
Exactly
Worthless commentary on worthless NPR. Pro-Israel, pro-USA to a great fault. I suppose this is the kind of person that has come to define Liberal. Boring, uninsightful. Blame it on old age. Perhaps. If you get your news from NPR and the likes of Shorr you have a totally distorted picture of reality.
I was born before 1961. Schorr comes out of that group of journalists exemplified by Edward R. Murrow. Compare those people to today's group of compulsive talkers, stenographers and gossip mongers who have enough hard bark on them to call themselves "journalists" but are really the disciples of Howard Beale, and you might think Schorr worthy of at least a nod of approval. After all, he did make Nixon's Enemies List.
Dear Mordechai, All credit to Daniel Schorr for his earlier career, and yes, a nod of approval. However, in the recent decade, with its 9-11 attack and the resulting Patriot Act, Iraq War and abolition of Habeus Corpus, I cannot recall anything that the good gentleman said to reverse the trend.
Tony Vodvarka
I was impressed by his cool when he read his name on Nixon's enemies list. His tone didn't change a bit.
I can't say much good about Schorr so I'll keep my gob shut.
Daniel Schorr was a journalist, not a political activist and it's no wonder to me why the "left" is so marginalized in the USA when they are so quick to blame others for their own lack of impetus. He was a damn sight better than 99% of what passes for TV and radio news journalists today.
If you are tired of being marginalized, then organize and get outside and fight the system. Take to the streets and take the streets. Look at how the Greeks fight back, or the French. Their governments actually fear the people. Their citizens do not fear their governments even when their governments use authoritarian methods to put down public unrest.
A journalist you say. I heard a few of Shorr's presentations on NPR. He had absolutely nothing to add. He only commented, that is, he gave his opinion, no new facts, just what he heard from the "news". He was a US apologist - - bland, common, uninteresting opinions, supportive of US. He must have been a Democrat. We are sorry that your idol is being torn down. Anybody with the smallest amount of decency or respect for themselves or the public would denounce the atrocious US leadership from Congress to the President; Shorr did not. Perhaps you think the US is now not doing too bad of a job considering what they were dealt from Bush. Perhaps you feel that we have to work within the system and that it will take time to undo all the damage Bush has done. We are not of this orientation. There are no excuses for what the US is doing to it's citizens and the world. Shorr did not criticize the US; he talked political strategy and trivia. I am no expert on this guy and couldn't stand to listen to his mild manner and inconsequential mumbling. He was obviously enamoured with himself and his "legacy" and constant flattery. Perhaps he should have retired 30 years ago.
While we're at it, let's throw the New York Times into the cesspool of contemporary journalism. This is what is often termed the Liberal/Left/Democrat press. The instances of their corruption are too numerous to mention here but I will supply some if requested - - the whole promotion of the Iraq War comes immediately to mind (think Judith Miller). Just saw "The Most Dangerous Man in America, Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers." It was quite interesting and well made. The NYT initially brought the Pentagon Papers to the public but they would not do anything like that today. I suggest a better object of adoration than Schorr is Daniel Ellsberg. He is 79 years old, still active, still critical of US wars; so different from Schorr and his cohorts.
I am going to correct myself before anyone else does. As if anyone cares. NYT has just published some of the documents that have been long awaited from WikiLeaks.org. It is all very much like the Ellsberg-Nixon confrontation: "The White House condemned the document disclosure, saying it "put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk." I must admit the NYT is often unpredictable - - at least by me. Is this the beginning of the end of the War? - - three or four more years will tell - - like the American War in Vietnam after the Pentagon Papers were published.
I have fought the good fight. I have run the course. I have kept the faith
For several years after Schorr first joined CBS, he gave interesting and informative analyses of current events, often critical of government policy. But sometime after he was named on the Nixon hitlist, he seemed to wither, to change, and he ultimately became a journalistic hack, as some have noted in these commentaries, a cold warrior who rather consistently followed our state department line, and an apologist for Israel. His last days with NPL, on the disgusting Scott Simon program (also someone who showed some initial promise, but badly faded) were hard to take.
I feel like I've lost a member of my own family. I called him "Grandpa Dan," and my wife and I would always suspend whatever conversation we were having to listen to Mr. Schorr's commentary on Saturday morning.
He was the very last of a generation of journalists who considered their craft essential to the maintenence of a functioning democracy. That he did not descend into ideological editorials in his reporting clearly has attracted the attack dogs of the CD Thought Police. Even though I have political opinions consistent to this site, which is to say pretty far Left, I still understand that the role of a non ideological press is to be the "fourth estate" of our democracy.
Daniel Schorr was the embodiment of a true newsman. In his later years, he had accrued to himself not only a vast amount of information, but an accompaning well of experience that distilled into what can only be described as wisdom.
He was a giant whose like we are unlikely to see again for quite sometime.
Thank you, Grandpa Dan. Godspeed.
I always looked forward to Daniel Schorr's commentary on NPR. Over the years he became the only voice that has been worth listening to. He told it like it was. Scott Simon gave a very nice tribute yesterday. It's a shame that Scott Simon is more a personality than a serious journalist and commentator. How does that happen with a mentor like Schorr?
The most recent of thousands of reasons I do not listen to PBS.
Years ago when I tuned in, Mr.Schorr's commentary was typically the closest thing to a progressive voice.
Thank you Daniel for pushing as you did in those halls of
faux progressives, pacifiers and lulliby journalism.
Any man that made Nixons enemy list I have respect for.
My preferred memories of Daniel Schorr are the times he appeared on Sunday's =Meet the Press= hosted by Lawrence Spivak (wearing a bow tie).
I enjoyed the show even more if Bernard Kalb was there to tweak Dan's nose on some topic, because although Schorr had a mind like a steel trap he had a short fuse and little sense of humor. Yes, the timbre of his voice was ear-catching and bespoke brilliance.
Trylon
The news video from the AP. I'll miss him.
Veteran Reporter Daniel Schorr Dead at Age 93
Veteran reporter Daniel Schorr, who is best known for his Watergate coverage, has died at age 93. The journalist held prominent positions at both CBS and NPR and is known for reporting on President Nixon's Enemies list, on which he discovered himself. http://www.newslook.com/videos/232269-veteran-reporter-daniel-schorr-dead-at-age-93?autoplay=true
What is beyond me is there are comments posted here that admire Schorr. Several people just adore him. Very strange. So who are these Progressives? Seems to be evenly split in this small sample of people who love him and people who can't stand the man. What is the difference in these two groups? Is one the "positive" types who support Obama and the Democratic Party and feel things are not going so badly, who want to organize us and "make a difference" and the other group is the "negative" types who are cynical, pessimistic and outraged at the way things are going and are completely disgusted with any support for this rotten system. It is very strange to me and rather upsetting.
You make my point for me. Whether someone considers himself a radical progressive or a reactionary teabagger, in the internet age we are all suseptible to retreating to our little enclaves on the web where we can read only news and views that confirm our preconceived ideologies.
Mr. Schorr represented the very best of a profession that at its best does the hard work of gathering, fact checking, contextualizing, and reporting the who, what, where, and why of local, national and world events.
We are increasingly in danger of losing this vital resource to a fuctioning democracy: a well-informed public- as we refuse to consider any information that fails to confirm our existing biases.
Good news reporting forces me to continually reevaluate my opinions as conditions change. It doesn't tell me what to think. Fox News, of course, is an example of the latter. Would you have a progressive network with it's own ideological blinders, Zamboni? Because that won't "even the score." It would just further muddy the waters.
Schorr was a reporter and a newsman of the highest calibre, and our nation needs more of that if we are to face the problems in front of us.
Hello Zamboni-
Glad you like Moyers. Me too. Here's what he said about Schorr:
"At NPR, he exemplified the very best of public broadcasting by refusing to be intimidated by either official funders or partisan thugs who besieged the brass in protest of his honest reporting," Moyers wrote Friday in an e-mail. "With razor-sharp wit, personal courage, and love of our craft, he distinguished himself and journalism."