Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Senate Likely to Break Deadlock on Jobless Benefits
WASHINGTON — The Senate is expected Tuesday to break its deadlock over extending jobless benefits to millions of people when it votes on whether to end a lengthy standoff over how to pay for the program.
The vote will come a day after President Barack Obama escalated his attacks on Republicans, blasting them for opposing an extension of unemployment benefits while pushing tax cuts for the wealthy. Republicans fired back, saying that Obama omitted an important point.
"It is appropriate for Congress to extend unemployment benefits. It's even more important for Congress to pay for them," said House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence of Indiana.
Money for extended benefits ran out in early June, and the Senate has been unable to muster the 60 votes needed to cut off debate and pass its plan to provide $33.9 billion to extend benefits through Nov. 30. The cost would add to the federal budget deficit; it’s not offset by spending cuts or higher taxes.
The most recent effort to end debate got only 59 votes on June 30, but at 2:15 p.m. Tuesday, Democrat Carte Goodwin of West Virginia is to be sworn into the Senate. West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin appointed him Friday to succeed Sen. Robert Byrd, who died June 28. Fifteen minutes later, the Senate plans to take another vote on ending debate.
Senate Democrats then will control 59 seats. Last month, Maine Republican Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins voted with the Democrats to cut off debate, while Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson, a Democrat, did not.
Goodwin would provide the 60th vote. The Senate then can vote on the bill’s final passage Tuesday or Wednesday. If the House of Representatives concurs as expected, an estimated 2.5 million people once again will be able to claim extended benefits.
The process of getting the benefits to claimants will vary, depending on their history and other factors, according to the Department of Labor. Spokeswoman Evangelina Garcia said that once Obama signed the bill, “checks can go out as soon as administratively feasible.
“Practically, it will depend upon how quickly the states can modify their automated benefit system to process the claims.”
Obama made a strong push Monday to get the Senate moving, though he failed to mention that Republicans have offered repeatedly to extend the benefits by providing plans to pay for them without adding to the deficit.
On June 30, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky proposed a two-month extension, paid for with unspent economic stimulus money, a plan that many Senate Democrats had suggested as part of a broader package.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada opposed McConnell’s proposal, saying that such benefit extensions traditionally are considered emergencies and need not have their costs offset.
“We as a Congress — Democrats and Republicans — have always extended unemployment benefits because it is an emergency,” Reid said.
McConnell’s proposal died.
Obama attempted to dramatize the deadlock Monday by appearing with three out-of-work Americans whose benefits have expired or are about to expire, saying they're victims of a Republican minority in the Senate that's blocked an extension of the benefits three times.
"After years of championing policies that turned a record surplus into a massive deficit, the same people who didn’t have any problem spending hundreds of billions of dollars on tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans are now saying we shouldn’t offer relief to middle-class Americans like Jim or Leslie or Denise, who really do need help," Obama said.
Obama was joined in the White House Rose Garden by Jim Chukalas, a laid-off auto parts manager from Fredon Township, N.J.; Leslie Macko, an out-of-work aesthetician from Charlottesville, Va.; and Denise Gibson, an unemployed maintenance supervisor from Queens, N.Y.
The president said he wanted the benefits extension enacted without offsets because it had been done that way in the past — with Republican support — and should be done that way now even amid growing concerns about trillion-dollar deficits.
"For a long time, there’s been a tradition, under both Democratic and Republican presidents, to offer relief to the unemployed," Obama said. "That was certainly the case under my predecessor, when Republican senators voted several times to extend emergency unemployment benefits."
Republicans protested that Obama’s drama Monday was unnecessary.
“The president knows that Republicans support extending unemployment insurance, and doing it in a fiscally responsible way, by cutting spending elsewhere in the $3 trillion federal budget,” said House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs was asked repeatedly Monday why the administration doesn't support offsets.
“In a time of great economic emergency,” Gibbs said, “as we have seen in the past, it’s necessary that we get the benefits that millions of Americans deserve that are out of work.”
"We ought not be playing politics with the unemployment benefits of those that have lost their jobs and are in an economy where there are five job applicants for every opening,” Gibbs said.
Obama’s been amplifying his attacks on Republicans of late.
In his Saturday radio address, Obama contrasted GOP demands that Congress pay for the jobless benefits with Republican pleas to extend Bush administration tax cuts for single filers who earn more than $200,000 annually and couples who make more than $250,000. That would add $391 billion to the deficit over 10 years.
- Posted in

18 Comments so far
Show AllThe unemployed should not get unemployment benefits until they get a job.
With my logic, I should be a Republican Senator.
Good Grief.
The unemployed should receive benefits until they get a job. I' not buying that we CAN'T AFFORD IT!!! How about if we close up shop in the Middle East and bring the troops home??? There's a cool $300 billion saved immediately!!!
NO MORE WAR!!! (as if it's really a war to begin with)!!!!!
It is essential to extend unemployment insurance benefits, however, the Democrats recently passed legislation that will discourage new job creation, including a stimulus package (less than 50% of the money created jobs), Obamacare (will hamper small business job creation) and the bankster bill that further empowers the banksters who caused the job losses that now require an additional extension of unemployment insurance benefits.
Until the Democrats stop pandering to corporations and start listening to the people who voted for them, you will not see the job creation needed to put the unemployed back to work.
Nah, your math is off. It's the top few percent exploiting the other ninety-something percent.
The senate is an artifact from an age when each state was like its own nation.
Ether we need to get rid of the Senate, or take the average population size of a state, then split up bigger states to meet that average( have like , say 8 Californias ). Smaller states will be able to stay independent.
I wonder if the real reason that the republicans don't want to extend unemployment benefits is that it would cause millions of the unemployed to cut their spending even more, making the economy even worse, thus increasing republican chances for more victories in the fall elections.
Am I being too cynical in thinking that?
Not too cynical...just very observant. This is another example of masterful Republican strategy.
Would someone please show me a state, with 2 Republican senators, where the economy is creating jobs and the unemployment rate is below 7%. I'm thinking Utah, Oklahoma and Wyoming, where their combined population represents less than 1 1/2% of the U.S. total, but they're given veto power over the rest of the 340 million citizens. Any ideas?
The Obama Adm. has failed the American worker and would rather score a political victory than actually make the decisions that would benefit the unemployed and strenghten an economy headed for the ditch once again. Double dip and all that. In the recession of 1980-83 UI benefits were extended for 3yrs to people in this country while taxes were cut for the wealthy. This was done with the help of Reagan and Tip O'Neil. They both understood the stimulus effect of what used to be called Keynesian Economics. It is not a theory it is a fact and it works. Today, even very conservative economists support UI benefits until the true unemployment figure is around 7%. This will require UI benefits until the end of 2012, at the very least. This cynical election year ploy should be understood for what it is: both political parties are covering their butts until after the Nov. elections with the idea of a 13 wk extention to get thru the holidays and X-mas. Got to pump up the #s for retailers. Then they'll sellout the workers again just like they did the 99ers. There are plenty of cuts that could be made or emergency legislation passed with little long-term effect to the nation's debt. Wise men who are experts have studied this to the nth degree and know it works. But the politicians offer platitudes and table scraps while the rich will get their tax cuts down the road in 2011. Another transfer of wealth to the top 10%. No other industrialized country would do this treasonous act to their workers and yet we still are passing laws making it better to open factories and employ people in other countries rather than here. These actions of cynical sellouts in Washington cannot be stopped by conventional means. The teachers, the social workers, the service workers, the construction workers will be sacrificed to this cynicism and hoodwinkery. It doesn't have to be this way. In fact, it is the stupidest thing we could do for our long term prospects.
Old 60 vote Harry and his 25 corporate Dem Senator's can't wait for Nov to get their cover back. (Remember "the Decider" only ever needed 50 votes). Then they can all go back to shuck and jive mode and complain about being in the minority. After the election we will probably see some really idealistic bills proposed by Senate Dems. Really idealistic because they will know that they don't have the votes to pass the bills. Don't be surprised if they are all of a sudden for single payer! The bills will probably be as glorious as those now coming out of the House. The House now has the cover of knowing that nothing they propose will pass the Senate. Nothing of value has a snowballs chance in hell of reaching Obama's desk for signature. Obama, Harry and Nancy have a wink and a nod thing going on - plausible deniability.
I guess I'm just really jaded.
FrankS makes an important point. The Republicans want to deprive the unemployed of rent and food money "not offset elsewhere". But they joyously spend money on multiple wars and 725 military bases around the world with NO offset. Hypocrisy reigns.
The Democrats have really have this filibuster phobia down to the T. When if ever are they going to look the budget reconciliation procedure which only require just over half of those present and voting to get anything passed, and this applies to anything which requires funding?
AD
Question(s).
There have been numerous references in the media to a republican filibuster on the extension of unemployment benefits (including on Democracy Now this morning) implying that it was real, but is there really a filibuster or is it the democrats Again allowing the republican posturing to control the government?
This article indicates it is the latter
The old and corrupt excuse of not having enough votes. Democrats had the White House and 60 votes for an entire year and they still moved the country even further to the right.
They're not a real party but a criminal enterprise. At least Republicans don't pretend to be other than what we know they are, swines.
Is anyone still falling for this cheap political theater brought to you by the US Congress? Does anyone still believe that Republicans are really opposing Democrats and Democrats are really opposing Republicans?
The same tired, old excuse from our congressional representatives. No money, laughable! How is it these same clowns have found BILLIONS to send to Pakistan!
I read that the money will be used to help Pakistan build water systems, improve their electricity grid and other projects to help improve their lifestyle. What about the good old USA. Here our infrastructure is crumbling and in need of repair and rehabilitation. I can see us americans footing the bill to improve OUR system, but to improve someone elses at our expense - hogwash! VOTE ALL THOSE CLOWNS OUT OF OFFICE, REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS!
"I can see us americans footing the bill to improve OUR system, but to improve someone else's at our expense - hogwash! VOTE ALL THOSE CLOWNS OUT OF OFFICE, REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS!"
There's a difference????