Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
CIA Can Expand Using Drones in Pakistan: Report
WASHINGTON - The White House has authorized the CIA to expand the use of unmanned aerial drones in Pakistan to track down and strike suspected Taliban and Al-Qaeda members, the New York Times reported Friday.
Pakistani citizens protest the continued use of CIA drones in fall of 2008. The White House has authorized the CIA to expand the use of unmanned aerial drones in Pakistan to track down and strike suspected Taliban and Al-Qaeda members, the New York Times reported Friday. (TARIQ MAHMOOD/AFP/Getty Images) The Times, citing unnamed sources, said that authorization to expand CIA drone usage in Pakistan's tribal areas came this week, coinciding with President Barack Obama's announcement Tuesday of sending 30,000 more US troops to Afghanistan.
Washington is also talking with Pakistani officials about using the drones to strike in Baluchistan -- a vast region outside of the tribal areas that borders Afghanistan and Iran -- where Afghan Taliban leaders are reportedly hiding, the Times reported.
Analysts, intelligence agents and foreign officials have widely reported that Taliban fighters use Baluchistan as a base, crossing over the border into Afghanistan to and from the Taliban's spiritual capital of Kandahar.
The northwest Pakistan tribal region has seen a surge in the US strikes, which fan anti-Americanism in the nuclear-armed Muslim country, since Obama took office.
While the drone program began under former president George W. Bush, the Obama administration has continued and expanded it.
Drones, usually armed with Hellfire missiles, are launched in the region and frequently controlled remotely from sites in the United States.
As a rule, the US military does not confirm drone attacks, which US officials say have killed a number of top-level militants.
Islamabad publicly opposes their use as a violation of its sovereignty, but analysts say that Pakistani officials give their use tacit support.
Criticism of the strikes in Pakistan has lessened in public since a US drone attack killed Pakistan's much-feared Taliban warlord Baitullah Mehsud on August 5.
In late October, UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions Philip Alston said that drone usage could be breaking international laws.
"The onus is really on the United States government to reveal more about the ways in which it makes sure that arbitrary extrajudicial executions aren't in fact being carried out through the use of these weapons," he added.
Alston said he had presented a report on the matter to the UN General Assembly.
Since August 2008, at least 65 such strikes have killed around 625 people, although it is difficult to confirm the precise identity of many of those who die given that the remote regions targeted are largely closed to outsiders.
- Posted in

12 Comments so far
Show AllAt least one USA general has said drones kill 80%-90% civilians.
do you have a source to sight?
which General said that?
Abnsmith
It turns out that it is even worse than 80 to 90 per cent. According to this article a counterinsurgencey adviser says that only 2 [two] per cent of drone missiles hit and kill their intended targets. And yet our Nobel Peace Prize president continues to send in these killing machines which end up slaughtering and maiming and crippling far more civilians that terrorists.
http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/05/11/drones-hardly-ever-kill-bad-guys/
As Howard Zinn has noted in regard to his being a bomber pilot during World War II and to which I can affirm as being true when I was in Vietnam, the use of bombs is a way of detaching oneself from the damage that these bombs inflict upon its victims. Likewise the use of drones is an effective way of depersonalizing the killing of these civilians and thus ends up sanitizing the murder of these people. Out of sight, out of mind.
"track down and strike suspected Taliban and Al-Qaeda members"
Suspected.
Oh beautiful for spacious skies......
I suspect that murderers are operating out of a five sided building in d.c.
pass me the controllers
The old standby, the American Monopoly game, has been joined by the new video game joystick thrill of overflying foreign territory from the comfort of home in the U.S. and decimating suspected 'terrorists', wedding parties, and random darker-skinned peoples for fun? and points, with Game Over/New Game deniability.
Looks CAN be deceiving!!!!! especially from the air!!!!
What; does somebody go out and scrape up some human debris for identification???? Oh Yea, CONFIRMED!!!!
DOUBT IT!
That's why we send in drones, it's too dangerous to send troops.
After a week of demonstrating against the drones and the war escalation, I believe that most Americans do not know what a drone is or what the goal is in Afghanistan.
American ambiguity or hypocrisy is evident when the U.S. sends a prisoner from Gitmo to New York City for a "fair" trial to show the world how civilized we are while at the same time the U.S. is sending drones to Pakistan to kill suspected terrorist without a trial. A so called friend, said to me when he saw my picture in the paper protesting drones: "You would rather our servicemen and women would get killed"? Like most Americans he doesn't know that America is fighting a very poor nation of people who as far as I know do not have the military means to shoot an airplane out of the sky. Does he think we are fighting a formidable enemy? The situation is we cannot identify who is friend and who is enemy. America cannot win, in these cases like Vietnam, so we don't care we just kill, kill, kill.No wonder so many of our troops have PTSD.
Genie
You may wish to convey to your alleged friend that the Afghans are engaged in fighting the American military for the simple reason that they are defending their country against an occupying force. He would have a valid point if American service men and women were dying to protect this country from being overrun by Afghans and/or Pakistanis. Since no Afghan or Pakistani had ever invaded this country, much less ever having threatened to do so, his patriotic sentiments end up ringing quite hollow. All the Afghans and Pakistanis desire is that the United States stop murdering their citizens.
Since I live in a rural part of the country, and end running into those type of patriotic people quite often, I can certainly understand what you are going through. Perhaps you can console yourself with a bit of dialogue that Henry Fonda had told one of the jurors who had attempted to engage in a conversation with another juror in the classic film Twelve Angry Men:
"He can't hear you. He never will."
Obama said he would expand the use of drones prior to getting elected on his Change.gov site under the military page.
If someone says in advance he intends to murder and rape someone, that does not make it better.
WTF type of inter/national assassinations ARE legal? How does one ARBITRATE a hemispheric Hellfire missile assassination, in any event? "Prostrate" yourselves (missionary position, preferably); Pakistanis, for more assaults of US Manifest Insanity on your sovereignty, soil and sod!