America's Economic Pain Brings Hunger Pangs
USDA report on access to food 'unsettling,' Obama says
The nation's economic crisis has catapulted the number of Americans who lack enough food to the highest level since the government has been keeping track, according to a new federal report, which shows that nearly 50 million people -- including almost one child in four -- struggled last year to get enough to eat.
At a time when rising poverty, widespread unemployment and other effects of the recession have been well documented, the report released Monday by the U.S. Department of Agriculture provides the government's first detailed portrait of the toll that the faltering economy has taken on Americans' access to food.
The magnitude of the increase in food shortages -- and, in some cases, outright hunger -- identified in the report startled even the nation's leading anti-poverty advocates, who have grown accustomed to longer lines lately at food banks and soup kitchens. The findings also intensify pressure on the White House to fulfill a pledge to stamp out childhood hunger made by President Obama, who called the report "unsettling."
The data show that dependable access to adequate food has especially deteriorated among families with children. In 2008, nearly 17 million children, or 22.5 percent, lived in households in which food at times was scarce -- 4 million children more than the year before. And the number of youngsters who sometimes were outright hungry rose from nearly 700,000 to almost 1.1 million.
Among Americans of all ages, more than 16 percent -- or 49 million people -- sometimes ran short of nutritious food, compared with about 12 percent the year before. The deterioration in access to food during 2008 among both children and adults far eclipses that of any other single year in the report's history.
Around the Washington area, the data show, the extent of food shortages varies significantly. In the past three years, an average of 12.4 percent of households in the District had at least some problems getting enough food, slightly worse than the national average. In Maryland, the average was 9.6 percent, and in Virginia it was 8.6 percent.
The local and national findings are from a snapshot of food in the United States that the Agriculture Department has issued every year since 1995, based on Census Bureau surveys. It documents Americans who lack a dependable supply of adequate food -- people living with some amount of "food insecurity" in the lexicon of experts -- and those whose food shortages are so severe that they are hungry. The new report is based on a survey conducted in December.
Several independent advocates and policy experts on hunger said that they had been bracing for the latest report to show deepening shortages, but that they were nevertheless astonished by how much the problem has worsened. "This is unthinkable. It's like we are living in a Third World country," said Vicki Escarra, president of Feeding America, the largest organization representing food banks and other emergency food sources.
"It's frankly just deeply upsetting," said James D. Weill, president of the Washington-based Food and Action Center. As the economy eroded, Weill said, "you had more and more people getting pushed closer to the cliff's edge. Then this huge storm came along and pushed them over."
Obama, who pledged during last year's presidential campaign to eliminate hunger among children by 2015, reiterated that goal on Monday. "My Administration is committed to reversing the trend of rising hunger," the president said in a statement. The solution begins with job creation, Obama said. And he ticked off steps that Congress and the administration have taken, or are planning, including increases in food stamp benefits and $85 million Congress just freed up through an appropriations bill to experiment with feeding more children during the summer, when subsidized school breakfasts and lunches are unavailable.
In a briefing for reporters, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said, "These numbers are a wake-up call . . . for us to get very serious about food security and hunger, about nutrition and food safety in this country."
Vilsack attributed the marked worsening in Americans' access to food primarily to the rise in unemployment, which now exceeds 10 percent, and in people who are underemployed. He acknowledged that "there could be additional increases" in the 2009 figures, due out a year from now, although he said it is not yet clear how much the problem might be eased by the measures the administration and Congress have taken this year to stimulate the economy.
The report's main author at USDA, Mark Nord, noted that other recent research by the agency has found that most families in which food is scarce contain at least one adult with a full-time job, suggesting that the problem lies at least partly in wages, not entirely an absence of work.
The report suggests that federal food assistance programs are only partly fulfilling their purpose, although Vilsack said that shortages would be much worse without them. Just more than half of the people surveyed who reported they had food shortages said that they had, in the previous month, participated in one of the government's largest anti-hunger and nutrition programs: food stamps, subsidized school lunches or WIC, the nutrition program for women with babies or young children.
Last year, people in 4.8 million households used private food pantries, compared with 3.9 million in 2007, while people in about 625,000 households resorted to soup kitchens, nearly 90,000 more than the year before.
Food shortages, the report shows, are particularly pronounced among women raising children alone. Last year, more than one in three single mothers reported that they struggled for food, and more than one in seven said that someone in their home had been hungry -- far eclipsing the food problem in any other kind of household. The report also found that people who are black or Hispanic were more than twice as likely as whites to report that food in their home was scarce.
In the survey used to measure food shortages, people were considered to have food insecurity if they answered "yes" to several of a series of questions. Among the questions were whether, in the past year, their food sometimes ran out before they had money to buy more, whether they could not afford to eat nutritionally balanced meals, and whether adults in the family sometimes cut the size of their meals -- or skipped them -- because they lacked money for food. The report defined the degree of their food insecurity by the number of the questions to which they answered yes.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
35 Comments so far
Show All-30-
"...and WE disdainfully step over bums passed out on the sidewalk."
I have been one day's scavenging away from being that bum. During the recession of the early 80s, which is now the MSM's benchmark for comparing unemployment statistics, I spent a year living in a storage space. In the rural place I live now there are no visible bums and the poverty is disguised. People are "respectably shabby."
Sometimes I think that things are so bad that, except for Sundays, if a stranger showed up in a suit and tie he might generate a lynch mob. "Is that a banker? Hang'im."
-30-
Hi OMR, thanks for sharing that; most would not, though they might have experienced it. I went 3 days & nites w/o eating once, I've been homeless a few times. Once from working 7 nites a week to to a year struggling in the gutter in the time it takes a bicycle to go down.
Safety net; I was born in Bel-Air, raised in Greenwich, Newport; until I left the fakers, the empty souls, the Steinway and it's black lacquer, reflecting nothingness.
Thus Spake Zarathustra
Anyone here feed a hungry homeless person today?
teddy, hi; I know you do this.
Another CD soul? If not you lacked time; spelt l.o.v.e.
Q. If progessives outnumber hungry, homeless people many to one as we do; why do they exist in those conditions? A. Because we are armchair quarterbacks is why. Intellectualizing-we erroneously percieve-as an inbred simian 1% leads us by the nose and WE disdainfully step over bums passed out on the sidewalk.
The "billions" being spent for a month of this illegal and horrid war in Afghanistan could be put to use helping the needy here, in AMERICA, the Red, White and Blue. Remember that place? Or have they forgotten.
Americans see China as economic threat
November 17, 2009 -- Updated 0545 GMT (1345 HKT)
Workers prepare to hoist a U.S. flag on Beijing's Tiananmen Square Monday ahead of U.S. President Barack Obama's visit.
Workers prepare to hoist a U.S. flag on Beijing's Tiananmen Square Monday ahead of U.S. President Barack Obama's visit.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
* 71 percent of Americans polled consider China an economic threat
* More than 1,000 adult Americans were questioned by telephone
* Poll coincides with Obama's visit to China
Washington (CNN) -- Americans are split over whether China represents a military threat to the United States -- but there is no doubt in the public's mind that the country poses an economic threat, according to a new national poll.
According to a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Monday, 51 percent of the public consider China a military threat, with 47 percent disagreeing. That 4-point margin is within the poll's 4.5 percent sampling error.
The poll's release coincides with U.S. President Barack Obama's first visit to China to bolster relations. At a town hall meeting on Monday he made the case to Chinese students that the two countries' philosophical differences should not get in the way of a robust relationship.
According to the survey, two-thirds see China as a source of unfair competition for U.S. companies, while only a quarter are more likely to view China as a huge potential market for U.S. goods.
Video: China's military power
Video: China going global
"That may be why 71 percent of Americans consider China an economic threat to the U.S.," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "Americans tend to view foreign countries as competition, and China is no exception."
Only a quarter of those questioned in the poll say that China has a good track record on human rights. Sixty-eight percent suggested that China is doing a bad job respecting the human rights of its citizens.
The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll was conducted November 13-15, with 1,014 adult Americans questioned by telephone.
If americans see CHINA as a "threat" in terms of its unpleasant meanings -- they should disabuse themselves of the notion.
the THREAT to AMERICANS comes FROM THEIR OWN LEADERS and CORPORATOCRACY.
THEY - with the complicity of the americans for generations have brought the "economic" threat to America upon themselves.
CHINA only is doing what any other nation, including the USA, does - look after its own interests.
to blame china - "manipulated yuan" , "low wage", "over exporting"...etc...and even attaching "lack of freedom in china"
are all DISTRACTIONS and DENIALS by americans from the recognition that the Economic debacle visiting america is THEIR OWN DOING .
china didn't TELL them to go ahead and glorify "privatizing" ..china didn't tell them to STOP buying cheap goods and US businesses and chamber of commerce STOP demanding for cheap products and services and labor
CHINA didn't DICTATE to the US federal Bank to "keep interest rates near ZERO" for EASY MONEY and credit
CHINA didn't tell wall street to go ahead and create "financial products" of PHANTOM VALUE
CHINA didn't ORDER nixon to take the Dollar OFF Gold with NO gold reserve backup or REAL assets back up or REAL productivity backup.
CHINA didn't GO TO WAR with trillions of dollars in expense
CHINA didn't TEACH americans to go ahead and MORTGAGE their futures and their children's for SHORT TERM "ownership" based on DEBT
so -- what are americans complaining about the "threat from china?'"
if anything it's CHINA that has always BEEN UNDER threat from the USA and western imperialists for 2 centuries at least!
it's only beginning to find a way to ASSERT ITS NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE with its own power and wealth and productivity and creativity and inventiveness. and really -- if all things were REALLY fair -- without these imperialism by the USA for generations
CHINA WOULD LONG AGO have maintained ITS HISTORIC 4,000 plus PRIMACY as the world's main power economy and civilization.
america is really showing itself to be what it has been all along , in the long scheme of civilizations:
an ABERRATION that is SHORTLIVED and a DISASTROUS FAILURE of an 'experiment'.
U.S. like a third world country? How about U.S. IS a third world country, a banana republic without the bananas. Elites skim trillions off government revenue and lord over barely paid workers. Meanwhile the peons hunt for crumbs. The difference is in most of the third world the peons know they are being screwed and it takes a AK57-on-every-corner police state to keep the lid on. Here, the peons passively accept this state of affairs. Many are glued to Fox News, vote Republican, think that taxing the rich in order to give to the poor is bad, and blame immigrants, homosexuals, terrorists and rogue states for their problems.
The New York Times
November 17, 2009
Op-Ed Columnist
What the Future May Hold
By BOB HERBERT
What will the United States be like in 20 years when today’s toddlers are in college or trying to land that first job or maybe thinking about starting a family?
The answer will depend to a great extent on decisions we make now about the American infrastructure.
This came to mind as I was reading about yet another closure of the problem-plagued San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, which is more than 70 years old. In 20 years, will today’s toddlers be traveling on bridges and roads that are in even worse shape than today’s? Will they endure mammoth traffic jams that start earlier and end later? Will their water supplies be clean and safe? Will the promise of clean energy visionaries be realized, or will we still be fouling the environment with carbon filth to the benefit of traditional energy conglomerates and foreign regimes that in many cases wish us anything but good?
The answers to these and many other related questions will depend to a great extent on decisions we make now (even in the midst of very tough economic times) about the American infrastructure. We’re trundling along in the infrastructure equivalent of a jalopy, with bridges rotting and falling down, while other nations, our competitors in the global economy, are building efficient, high-speed, high-performance infrastructure platforms to power their 21st-century economies.
We used to be so much smarter about this stuff. A recent publication from the Metropolitan Policy Program at the Brookings Institution reminds us that:
“Since the beginning of our republic, transportation and infrastructure have played a central role in advancing the American economy — from the canals of upstate New York to the railroads that linked the heartland to industrial centers and finally the interstate highway system that ultimately connected all regions of the nation.
“In each of those periods, there was a sharp focus on how infrastructure investments could be used as catalysts for economic expansion and evolution.”
Policy makers all but gave up on that kind of thinking years ago. America’s infrastructure, once the finest in the world, has been neglected for decades, and it shows. Felix Rohatyn’s book on the subject, “Bold Endeavors,” opens with: “The nation is falling apart — literally.”
It’s almost as if we no longer understand the crucial links between infrastructure and the health of the American economy, the state of the environment and the viability of the nation as a whole. We’ve become stupid about this.
Consider transportation. As Brookings tells us, “Other nations around the globe have continued to act on the calculus that state-of-the art transportation infrastructure — the connective tissue of a nation — is critical to moving goods, ideas and workers quickly and efficiently. In the United States, however, we seem to have forgotten.”
Much of the nation’s rail infrastructure is approaching the tail end of its useful life. If you’ve flown anywhere recently, you know what a nightmare that can be.
To the extent that we have any infrastructure policy at all, it is badly disjointed, dysfunctional, often doing more harm than good as it serves the interests of politicians who are crazy for pork rather than the real needs of the American public.
Brookings’ studies of American infrastructure policy have been extensive, and a conversation last week with one of its executives, Bruce Katz, offered a glimpse of the kind of economic environment today’s toddlers could face in a couple of decades if we started getting things right now.
“We’ll very likely have a low-carbon-based economy,” said Mr. Katz, “which will require enormous innovation with regard to energy and the infrastructure. We’ll be much more export-oriented than we are today, less consumption-focused.” And as a nation, he said, we should have a better understanding of the importance of the metropolitan areas that are the major drivers of the U.S. economy, and how essential it is to give them the coordinated national support that they need on infrastructure and other forms of development.
You can’t thrive as a nation while New Orleans is drowning, and Detroit is being beaten into oblivion decade after decade, and a bridge in Minneapolis is collapsing into the Mississippi River, and cities in upstate New York and the Rust Belt are rotting from lack of employment opportunities, and so on.
Imagine, instead, an America with rebuilt, healthy, dynamic metropolitan areas, and gleaming new port facilities, and networks of high-speed rail, an America with electric vehicles and a smart grid and energy generated by the power of the sun and wind and water and the ocean’s waves. Imagine if the children of today’s toddlers had access to world-class public schools all across the nation and a higher education system that is both first-rate and affordable.
Imagine if we set out seriously to do all this.
Imagine.
* Site Map
============
"IMAGINE"
IMAGINE ALL the people - no more war
specifically
IMAGINE ALL AMERICA -- no more war AND CAPITALISM which is WAR.
Thanks for your post. I agree with Mr Herbert that we need to be reformatting our grids now and putting Americans back to work doing that. I would posit that we should as a generation be cleaning and restoring our oceans and topsoils and reforesting our rainforests. I guess I am a dreamer and I know "I am not the only one."
all the creative HUMANE energy in america UNLEASHED
and create PARADISE - right here on earth
if only america STOPPED being a capitalist country that IS a WAR STATE.
CAPITALISM = WAR.
PERIOD.
Winners eat and losers starve. Unsettling but acceptable and necessary: Barack Hoover Obama
Roll this around the noggin:
In the same week:
$50 billion in Wall Street 'bonuses'...
50 million Americans can't afford to f**king eat.
I have never, ever been so f**king proud to be a God-blessed American!
Absolutely, I moved to NZ because I am so, "f**king proud to be a God-blessed American!". I want Obama to do what he preaches but this is unbelievable. The only way to stop ALL OF THIS GREED....get corporate money out of politics. In NZ, an Member of Parliament made front page news because he took is wife to California with with on a political trip, and had to pay back 20k. You cannot get away with that type of corruption anywhere else in the industrialized world. We have an OPEN BRIBERY SYSTEM AND WE WONDER WHY ITS SO BAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why can't I offer to "contribute" to a police officer's "Well being Fund" so he can let me off of the speeding ticket? But if I am a lobbyist, I can contribute to a US Senator to vote with the same corporations that cause all this harm, steal money, and destroy everything they touch.
The corruption in the United States will not be satisfied until ALL OF YOU ARE STARVING, SICK, DYING, OR HOMELESS. Look at what's going on and tell me I'm wrong. Debate is pointless, the corporations are playing for keeps and killing plenty of people along the way. Wake up and realize what is going on around you.
There are actual US Senators who would rather READ FROM A PHONE BOOK then do one thing...extending MEDICARE FOR EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN.....PERIOD. Seriously, we can't put these elected officials in jail for this????? Instead, we'd rather debate them. We are debating a murderer in a dark ally with a knife about the virtues of LIFE.
Many communities are now working together to assure food security, as the economy will continue to fail and energy prices rise. Support your food bank, support local small farms, start up community gardens, get to know your neighbors and find out who is vulnerable, as difficult times are just beginning.
And wasn't it just last week that one of the major evening TV news shows reported that the major grocery chains throw away at least one-fifth of their product? So much for the "efficiency of the markets."
I've noticed, too, as I visit my small-town "supermarket" and the super-discount store that sells damaged canned goods and off-date food items, that a lot of people are no longer doing laundry! That saves money. When you're old and poor who cares if your clothes are clean.
What a country.
-30-
hi OleManRiver...
"what a country" indeed.
and YET -- there is a SMALL SILVER LINING. one of REAL HOPE and HUmanity out of the disaster now wafting throughout the land and over people of ALL COLORS that once thought, especially whites, their privilege position as a "race" could save them ....
and that is -- because of the disaster - whites and blacks and other coloreds are finding themselves "commisserating" as they LINE UP FOR JOBS..and finding themselves trying to support each others' small businesses.
whites - in the south, for the first are finding themselves patronizing a struggling small restaurant of black people...and one can assume vice versa...
--
the HOPE of america lies IN americans...not their leaders.
but perhaps it is in times of REAL DIFFICULTY - one that shows americans what it is LIKE in other parts of the world that the USA has exploited
that "real" america can still have the HOPE to come forth. and unshackle themselves of the DIVISIVENESS propagated and cleverly encouraged by the RULERS and see that they should be and can be TRULY "united" as people, whatever their circumstances and color and background.
All poor have all in common; except those who remember having many things...their fury at losing them to the 1% will be insurrection's catalyst.
If we could tear down DC in '17 we could join celebrations with Moscow's 100th!
and what does OBAMA say?
"unsettling".....
UNSETTLING?
Dear Mister "Hope doesn't get delivered"....
it's NOT unsettling -- SIR - it's the result of YOUR FRIENDS and YOURSELF honing up on that CHICAGO SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS religion of YOURS! that you still go around the world lecturing and hectoring countries (like YOUR BANKER CHINA) to FOLLOW and OBEY that you try to "cleverly" package as "cooperation" and "partnership".
and SIRE - IT IS not "unsettling"
your fellow americans ARE HUNGRY and getting HOMELESS and BANKRUPT from your RULING CLASS POLICIES --
NOT because of China, Japan, Asia, Oil Countries, Russia
NO -- it's BECAUSE OF YOUR OWN POLICIES and ECONOMICS
and it's NOT "unsettling"
IT"S DISASTROUS and CALLOUSLY , MONUMENTALLY
a BIG FAT FAILURE!
the POLICIES you and your STUPID , EXPLOITATIVE and VICIOUS chicago school of economics Priesthood SEND across the world
HAS COME HOME IN WAVES - sire...
ON YOUR OWN FELLOW AMERICANS!
and that's JUST FOR STARTERS - so don't get into any DELUSION that it's going to "recover".
there is NO recovery from the CHICAGO SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS DISASTERS unless IT IS THROWN OUT THE WINDOW .
This can be easily fixed by extending and enhancing tax cuts to all Americans making over 150,000 a year.
The people will then have extra money they can contribute to Food banks. (Sarcasm)
By all means contribute to Food Banks as people need to eat BUT the State and the system is USING the prescence of Food bank to perpetuate and expand the inequities that they have been designed into the system.
Doling out food on a "as you deserve it" system is a great means to maintain political control. People wait "shamefully" in que for their weekly food and remain docile so as to ensure they do not get thrown out of the line.
It my opinion that people of a given Nation of a fundamental right to the necessities of life be it food, water and shelter, and they should not have to feel shame or as failures depending on how they get that food.
The great tragedy is that with psychopaths in charge the only time they might consider the plight of the poor is when the Food bank shelves emptied and the people riot in the streets. Even then it would not be out of concern for those hungry people, but merely as an act of self preservation.
The system we call capitalism as it exists today has got to go. It rewards those without Conscience creating a society without conscience.
The quality of the food should be in question but it isn't. Today's food makes one hungry so fast compared to yesterday's version. If we switched from agri-business to non-profit, hunger wouldn't be so bad. We could do that and still have enough for the world's poor.
Most people are used to getting a meal fast and easy otherwise they scream FOOD CRISIS ! That kind of impatience makes food profiting and capitalism too hard to resist.
Hunger in the United States of America, the greatest and most exceptional nation in the entire history of the world. Thank GAWD-UH that we can still affords trillions of dollars to pay for killing dirt poor brown people on the other side of the earth.
PLEASE support your local food bank. It could be YOU standing in line there next month.
HAs it really come to that? I mean that the USA - AMERICA -
can now be "THOUGHT OF" by the REST OF THE WORLD
for something America was NEVER SUPPOSED TO SLIDE INTO and LECTURES OTHERS on how to NOT HAVE IT HAPPEN TO THEM?
AMERICA -- HUNGER ?
it now JOINS
"Africa-HUNGER"
"THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES = HUNGER"....
wasn't and isn't america, by its claims SUPPOSED to be EXISTING ON ANOTHER PLANET where there is ONLY
PLENTY and PROSPERITY and TRICKLEDOWN WEALTH?
oh my............HUNGER.....and not just for some ISOLATED town in some THIRD WORLD appalachian county....no no no....
it's AMERICA = HUNGER = IN THE TENS OF MILLIONS
and that includes a LOT of WORKING FAMILIES....
can you imagine when THESE LOSE JOBS and hours too?
and food pantries can't take them all in? America would be showing
showing OFF its TENS OF MILLIONS OF HUNGRY PEOPLE sitting on the streets - with hands out -- JUST LIKE IN .........
uh.........THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES....
once HUNGER BEATS SHAME SO MUCH and americans REALIZE:
"hey -- i'm hungry -- heck - my next door neighbor went pandhandling -i'm gonna join him!! who cares?"
One danger in this is that Vilsack (who has strong ties to biotech industry) and others will work to promote GM food as an answer to this problem.
But the big thing is that as long as the US keeps playing its empire game, these problems will simply mount. Politicians will, as usual, pay lip service after someone calls attention to the headlines.
Hungry people will become desperate, though, and then they take to the streets in all sorts of ways.
This government had better wake up.
The government isn't sleeping,
they don't care about the hunger,
in fact, profit from the strife.
"Hungry people will become desperate, though, and then they take to the streets in all sorts of ways."
When all is lost, and one has nothing more to lose, one often "loses it".
Yes, in a land full of guns and ammo.
Wanna help the problem today?
Feed ONE homeless person one time; you won't have to make physical contact; delicately hand a sandwich then jerk hand back as soon as you touch someone's heart.
Helps with one's own self-respect a bit too I've heard from others.
Above process takes 1-7 dollars and 5-10 minutes; how 'bout anyone who does it mention it later? Please? Words or Direct Action mon frere?
Signed, Pragmatic Riff-Raff.
this is most essential whenever we are able to do it. i do it at times. and i wish I could do it more as poor as i am already.
but it is true -- when you do it - to a complete stranger and thinking of nothing back - not even expecting "thankyou" - just the feeling that you might have given someone a little bit for a few more hours of relief from hunger is really an overwhelming feeling. i can't describe it. you really do get "more back" than you gave...even if you never really think that way...
i don't know how to say it better.
This food shortage situation is totally unacceptable in a country that has been blessed with abundance beyond words!!!
And Mr. Obama callls it "unsettling!" UNBELIEVABLE!!!! Our government needs to "WAKE UP" and stop thinking only of themselves and their own personal enrichment. It's disgusting and sickening!!!!
I have no respect for any of them!!!
and actually destroying the other countries' OWN self-sustaining agriculture.
that is , after all, how the USA conglomerates destroyed the agriculture and small farmers of weaker countries...by "pricing" them OUT...and so - their farmers, peasants, workers
end up IN "el NORTE" -- where the DISASTER was concocted and spread from...the SOURCE of the EVIL.
The consequence of free market capitalism.
EXACTLY! now americans more and more can really FEEL in their stomachs what "free market capitalism" IS REALLY all about!