Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
For Anti-War Protesters, the Cause Isn't Lost
But Will D.C. Rally Spark Groundswell?
The protesters convened for a final planning meeting, already triumphant, convinced that nine months of preparation was about to pay off. Antiwar organizers who had come to Washington from 27 states exchanged hugs inside a Columbia Heights convention hall and modeled their protest costumes: orange jumpsuits, "death masks," shackles and T-shirts depicting bloody Afghan children. Then Pete Perry, the event organizer, stood up to deliver a welcome speech.
"This is a great moment for our movement," he said. "We are continuing an incredible tradition."
"Like Gandhi," said the next speaker.
"Like Martin Luther King," said another.
A Sunday meeting and a Monday protest -- that was the agenda planned in advance of Wednesday's eighth anniversary of the start of the Afghan war. There had been other protests in Washington over the course of the conflict, dozens of them, but this time organizers believed they could revive the beleaguered antiwar movement, once such a force in U.S. policy. The next 48 hours would put their optimism on trial.
With public opinion polls showing a majority of Americans opposing the war, organizers wanted at least 1,000 people to march through downtown, risk arrest by creating a ruckus at the White House and draw President Obama across the manicured North Lawn to meet with them.
"The goal of this action is to hand-deliver a letter to Obama," Perry reminded the group. "We want a meeting to demand an end to this senseless violence."
It would also set the stage for 42 rallies and protests scheduled to take place Wednesday around the country. After decades of decline in the antiwar movement -- from throngs of half a million to fringe rallies to almost nothing at all -- the job of organizers in Washington was to generate momentum for a historic week.
Their work started Sunday afternoon, when about 50 organizers met to discuss final plans for a rally with a scope to match their ambition. They included veterans and pacifists, hippies and anarchists, feminists and Catholic workers. In total, there were more than a dozen "affinity groups," and each had choreographed its own demonstration for Monday's event. Some protesters would be shackled inside a cage, in solidarity with prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. Some would reenact the deaths of U.S. soldiers near the White House fence. Some would read the names of civilians killed in Afghanistan. Some would carry cardboard coffins.
"We have to be organized, or nobody will hear anything," Perry said.
As the meeting progressed, there were signs of discord. Some groups wanted to chant while they marched to the White House; others argued that a solemn, single-file procession would convey a "better sense of suffering," one protester said. Some wanted to take bathroom breaks during the protest; others argued that participants could wait until they were in jail, after their arrests. Some planned to misidentify themselves to police; others said they would simply refuse to answer questions.
"Lying is dumb," one protester shouted.
"Just because my resistance is different than yours doesn't mean I'm dumb," another yelled back, standing now, clenching his fist. "We are all traveling down our own paths to peace."
* * *
Every faction agreed on at least one goal for Monday's rally, knowing all too well that the survival of the movement depended on it: This was the time to attract new protesters, with the war in Afghanistan continuing to dominate the news and Obama debating his next move. After Sunday's meeting, Perry, the organizer, held a training session for first-time demonstrators in the sanctuary of a church. He arrived prepared for a crowd, with a co-teacher and a thick stack of handouts.
Instead, four people came. Three were experienced activists. Only one was a newcomer. Joan Wages, a mother of two, had driven five hours from Floyd, Va., to attend her first rally. She had voted for Obama but become disillusioned. Now she hoped to set an example for her children by "making my actions consistent with my beliefs," she said.
"I've done a few really little protest things, but that's it," Wages told the instructors. "I really don't know what to expect."
The instructors gave a brief lesson on the history of nonviolent resistance and then read motivational quotes from Buddhist monks. At the end of the class, they asked Wages to hold a make-believe vigil at the White House while the instructors mimicked angry right-wing activists and tried to bait her. Wages closed her eyes, set her hands in prayer and started singing.
"We should run you over with a big war tank!" the instructors yelled.
"We should shoot you with our guns!" they shouted.
Wages continued to sing, undaunted, until the instructors broke from character to applaud.
"You're ready," Perry said.
"Just remember that nonviolence is a way of life," said Susan Crane, the co-instructor.
"And that police officers are our brothers and sisters, too," Perry said.
Wages thanked them and left the training seminar, but she struggled to fall asleep later that night. The session had been helpful in a "philosophical kind of way," she said later, but she still had logistical concerns about Monday's protest. Like: "Who will pick me up from jail?" And: "After we all pretend to die in front of the White House, can I get up and move or does everyone have to stay totally still?"
* * *
The protesters met Monday morning in McPherson Square, a slab of grass in downtown Washington named after a war hero. They had hoped to fill the park, but instead 176 protesters gathered in one corner. The crowd was all familiar faces from the antiwar movement, except for a homeless man sleeping on a bench, a bicyclist eating a scone and a Street Sense newspaper salesman who saw a business opportunity in the gathering.
Eve Tetaz, 78, stood near a small sound stage and zipped up her orange jumpsuit. She had a trial pending from another protest, but she still planned to risk arrest Monday -- something she had done so often that preparing for jail was part of her routine. Phone numbers of fellow protesters were inked on her forearm so she could call from jail. A neighbor in Adams Morgan had agreed to watch her two cats. Her glaucoma medicine was packed underneath her jumpsuit. She wore a heavy sweatshirt that itched in the heat but would make for a fantastic pillow in a cell.
"Jail is a little uncomfortable," Tetaz said, "but so is the dentist."
On the stage in front of her, a rotation of speakers tried to excite the crowd. Two women strummed guitars and sang a folk song. Then a man recited a poem. Then a woman spoke about the persecution of blacks in Southeast Washington. Then another poet, and another singer, and a woman banging a tambourine, and a keynote speaker, and another folk song, this time performed in Hebrew.
"We should be going soon," Tetaz said.
Finally, an organizer stepped to the microphone and told the protesters to form a single-file line for the march to the White House. They were instructed to walk slowly, heads down, in absolute silence.
"A solemn march," the speaker said.
As the group departed, a few protesters smiled and chatted with nearby police officers.
"Please everybody, a solemn march," the speaker reiterated, louder this time. "Solemn. Solemn."
* * *
The protesters arrived at the White House and quickly realized they were entering into a ruckus, not just creating one. A construction crew was at work on Pennsylvania Avenue, removing excess water with two loud industrial vacuums. Smaller protest groups -- one demanding to see Obama's birth certificate, another enraged about health care -- shouted chants of their own. A maintenance worker used a chain saw to trim a tree on the White House grounds. Inside the building, press secretary Robert Gibbs was telling reporters that leaving Afghanistan was "not something that had ever been entertained."
The antiwar group launched into its demonstration, undeterred. One protester pretended to waterboard a war prisoner, screaming, "Tell me your secrets or else" as he poured distilled bottled water onto a friend's face. A woman wore shackles and a black bag over her head, the toenails on her bare feet painted a deep autumn red. Cindy Sheehan, a tireless protester, read from her International People's Declaration of Peace, and then, sensing an inattentive crowd, said, "I am going to skip a couple paragraphs and just go to the end."
The marchers marched, the singers sang, the chanters chanted. Tourists turned their cameras away from the White House to take pictures of the protest.
But there was a problem.
"Why aren't the police doing anything?" one demonstrator asked, referring to the 15 uniformed officers who stood casually in the distance.
The protesters wanted to engage them, so 15 activists wearing orange jumpsuits chained themselves to the White House fence. "Off the fence!" a police officer yelled, but the chains were locked. Five officers rode over on horseback.
Five more put on black gloves and came with wire cutters. Now the Secret Service was clearing the sidewalk, and the Park Police was issuing a warning for the protesters to disperse, then a second, then a third.
"We will have to arrest anyone who does not clear this area immediately," an officer announced over a megaphone.
Sixty-two protesters stood their ground, and the police walked over slowly with plastic handcuffs. Sheehan was arrested at 1:11 p.m., and she smiled as police frisked her. Tetaz, the 78-year-old, was arrested at 1:14, ready for another trip to jail. Wages, the newcomer, pretended to be a dying soldier and remained motionless as she waited for arrest, only to be forcibly removed instead.
Police loaded the protesters onto a Metro bus and drove them away from Pennsylvania Avenue.
Those who had avoided arrest tallied the rally's impact: 62 arrests, 23 others forcibly removed.
"A success," Perry said.
As the protesters walked away from the White House, they made plans to leave for other rallies across the country Wednesday. One was headed to an action in New York, another to Austin and another to San Francisco. Two planned to attend an event in Chicago, where the organizer, John Beacham, expected a big crowd and possibly more arrests. "We think this could be a turning-point kind of moment," he said.
- Posted in

24 Comments so far
Show AllIs there a reason that there is no name or website listed for these protests?
Joe
Copy and paste into your address window
http://votersforpeace.us/index2.php
Lots of links too.
I commend the protesters and as accurrate as the article may be, it is also very depressing.
While I commend the protesters, it is unfortunate that their actions are misguided and futile.
- the war in Afghanistan -
Mistake #1. The DAFT war's enemies are al-Qaeda and the Taliban, and al-Qaeda is in more places than just Afghanistan (Iraq, for instance).
So, the protesters are trying to stop half a war? How is that going to be successful?
- Obama debating his next move -
#2. Wishing for Santa Obama to fix everything, rather than demanding responsibility from Congress, who just wasted months of America's precious time with their healthcare charade.
Nobody's mad at them, only at Mr. Obama. Why is that?
- the instructors mimicked angry right-wing activists -
#3. The solution to our dilemma must involve all citizens. Any proposed solution that involves antagonizing the other 'wing' is doomed to failure - there will not be enough strength gathered together.
Where are the calls for UNITY? All I see is political maneuvering.
The only solution that can work will need all citizens. What can we offer the 'right-wing activists' besides hostility?
And that's why I continually propose that we aim at the law that created and fuels all this madness. The 'right-wing' could get behind this, since this law created the war that will destroy the US military (who have been tasked with the impossible 'preventing future terrorism').
Nothing will be accomplished (just as nothing has been accomplished) until Public Law 107-40 is brought into the light of day.
I agree with your assessment that a re-enactment of the societal division so deftly fortified since the 60s will only create war between the two wings. We need unity, and to achieve that, we have to forego the stereotyping of the opposition. We can start by recognizing that the Right wing believes what they do because they think it is in our best interests and their conclusions are based upon their information. That is no different that the Left wing. We believe we have the best interest of our society at heart and we base our beliefs on the information we have. Create two completely parallel information bases and you can turn internecine warfare on and off like a spigot.
Let's not demonize our fellow citizens, because as aggravating as we find them, they find us to be also. Let's go for objectives like you have suggested.
It may not cause a groundswell, but it can't hurt. Anything that aids the removal of our troops from both Iraq and Afganistan is laudable in any case.
The large anti-war media groupies apparently exited with Bush.
The most heartening thing is that many Conservatives and Independents are turning against this waste. 57% opposed and rising.
The description of the D.C.protests certainly doesn't suggest anything like the "groundswell" mentioned in the sub-title. It is obvious how "terrified" the White House was of the protests in that Robert Gibbs said Monday that withdrawal from Afghanistan is "off the table" and Obama amended that slightly on Tuesday in saying that any drastic decrease in forces was off the table. I'm afraid that the situation remains just as it was with Obama's election: that he has totally emasculated the anti-war movement because his "hopeful" followers who "hoped" that he would be a peace President are unwilling to make life difficult for the man they helped elect. Until many many more of the Kool aid-afflicted begin to join these protests, any "groundswell" is an idea that could only be entertained seriously by the afflicted editors of Nation magazine.
You nailed it, Jerry. Unfortunately, this is the situation and Obamamania still exists, and when confronted, his faithful supporters make one excuse after another for his justification for permanent warfare and the military-police state.
Let me see if I've got this straight: nine months of planning, veteran peace activists come from 27 states hoping for 1,000 people to march on the White House and deliver their message to President Obama, and only 176 protesters showed up? The heading and text of this article proclaim the cause is not lost, then wonders aloud if "DC rally will spark a groundswell..... [reviving] the beleaguered antiwar movement, once such a force in US policy."
I must have blinked and missed that historic moment. When exactly was it that the American antiwar movement was "a force" shaping US policy, foreign or domestic?
The last DC antiwar demonstration I took part in was at the height of the Bush/Cheney era, and over 300,000 people turned out. It was an outstanding, colorful, enthusiastic event. All that was missing was mainstream media news coverage, and even token appearances by significant political decisionmakers - Republican, Democratic, and/or independent - willing to associate themselves publicly with the assembled citizenry.
Back when Bush and the GOP were running the government, demonstrations against the wars were often considered pointless, because everbody knew in advance the Bushies would never listen.
Now that Obama and the Democrats are running the government, demonstrations against the wars appear equally pointless because bringing the troops home is not considered a serious policy option on the table, an option worthy of serious discussion.
I also commend the DC protesters, keeping alive the legacy of nonviolent activism. If the goal was to impact majoritarian popular opinion regarding Iraq and Afghanistan, then it's already a mission accomplished.
But if the goal is to change federal government policy, the peace movement remains tragically marginalized, groundswell or no groundswell. Very depressing indeed.
Bill from Saginaw
Sadly enough, this protest was a sort of poster boy for the current state of the US. The American sheeple are too wrapped up in their wall sized TV's and watching football to protest. The mass media almost always distorts or ignores such things, The same thing was true during the anti-war demonstrations during the Vietnam war.
What We the People are going to have to learn (and it may already be too late) is that our bought and paid for legislative, executive and judicial branches do what they are told. They are honest politicians; they stay bought.
The handful of obscenely wealthy and powerful that are really running things only want MORE. They have no care for anything else. The profit margin for endless war is far greater than if their factories were turning out refrigerators and stoves. The toll in misery and death means nothing to them, it's just the cost of doing business.
Possibly, a national strike that would shut the country down, a national boycott of the big chains, perhaps a national tax revolt, might make a difference, but when you read about combat brigades being seconded to NorthCom to be trained in "suppressing civil dissent" and the new terror and pain inducing equipment to be used to control and disperse crowds, not to mention the many concentration camps now staffed and ready, it may well be too late. The historical parallels we are looking at could make us a "Fourth Reich" with a rubber stamp Reichstag to make the decisions "legal," a figurehead leader, following the orders of the wealthy, the powerful, and the military high-command; and endless war on any pretext.
Fortunately, empires eventually break up from the rot within and the resistance from without, but at what a cost! Whole generations thrown into the meat grinder; millions starved, homeless, diseased; widening wars, conscription.
Someday, perhaps, the sun will break through the clouds.
I am a great fan of Yogi Bera, and his wit and wisdom.
"When you find a fork in the road, take it" is just one of them.
But my favorite is: I don't make predictions, especially about the future'.
But I will in this case make a 'prediction,especially about the future'.
The USA will 'exit Afghanistan' on exactly the date and time that the Plutocratic Oligarchy that put the USA there in the first place; 'allows' them to leave.
The USA is already claiming 'victory in Iraq' ,which would have been an easy prediction since the reasons for attacking Iraq were 'fabricated' ---the 'victory there' would be just as easily fabricated. So the 'PO' has now given the Americans what they need to continue the war in Afghanistan for as long as the 'PO' wants them to ; after all if you can win in Iraq you can win in Afghanistan; right? As for the 'peace movement', the same 'lie', 'if we can win in Iraq, we can win in Afghanistan'---will keep the protesters on the 'fringe'.
The real tests coming up for the USA is the devaluation of their currency on the world exchange, their support for the rogue and criminal Israeli state, and whether or not the USA will assist Israel in attacking Iran. If they do, then China will have no other choice but to cut off the credit lines; and the US 'dollars will be used for cigarette paper' but only for those who can 'steal' enough 'tobacco' to roll a cigarette--since most Americans will not be able to afford the Tobacco, they'll just have a lot of 'rolling papers'.
Add this test to the dissolving economy, the crumbling infrastructure, and the religious far rights's potential for 'taking over the country till jesus gets back', the USA has a very large 'list' of 'self inflicted' dangers which may be the most challenging the USA has ever had. And they seem to be changing every day and not very many of them are 'good changes'.
In addition to that. If China can 'devalue' the dollar, the trillion dollar debt the USA-- OWES THEM-- could take longer to pay back if the 'dollar has less value'. That would be something you would expect the Americans to do to someone else; not the other way around. After all that is exactly what the USA did to Cuba after the Spanish American War, and had a 'good deal' until Fidel Castro 'put a turd in the punchbowl'.
The first sign of any 'fall from power' is when your opponents use your own tactics against you, which is exactly what the Visigoths used upon the Romans----then they 'sacked Rome'.
The members of the 'PO' will have already moved their 'assets' to 'off shore sites'----(as with the Bush family buying several hundred thousand hectares of land in Paraguay which I am sure is for an orphanage or some other altruistic purpose)---and be ready to take their 'money and go play somewhere else', with other peoples lives.
And to think; the Americans brought it all upon themselves.
And the same irony is that if there were ever a nation that could 'change' it could be the USA---but they do need to 'hurry a bit' with the changes and they need to be the 'right changes'----only the future will tell.
"If the USA were another nation the USA would invade the USA to keep the world safe; and they would be justified."
"whether or not the USA will assist Israel in attacking Iran. If they do, then China will have no other choice but to cut off the credit lines;"
Hasn't Iran already agreed to an 8 BILLION dollar deal to supply oil to China? If there is any foolish and abhorrent attack on Iran all hell will break loose around the World. China is NO fool.
Keep in mind that Iran intends to stop or has already stopped trading oil in dollars, and instead use the Euro. Iraq did this and look at what happened to their country and the senseless bloodshed that followed.
China, Iran and Russia have said ENOUGH! No more war! So I doubt there'll be any attack on Iran, which would equate to WWIII. The line in the sand has been drawn.
It is time to end the hegemony, and to promote Peace around the Globe.
"The mass media almost always distorts or ignores such things ... "
Let's talk about Jim Lehrer's "public" News Hour.
Now its being funded by Monsanto (i.e., genetically modified foods) ...
... also Chevron (i.e., petroleum industry)
... also Pacific Life (i.e., insurance industry)
... oh yes, formerly by ADM (agribusiness), which corp. was fined $100million for price fixing.
... which explains why it, too, refuses to take on real issues.
To fully fund PBS (which, stepwise, has been defunded since Reagan) would cost the taxpayer about three days worth of bilking by defense contractors.
The article's title "Is the Peace Movement Creating a Groundswell?" reminds me of one of my favorite New Yorker cartoons:
http://www.cartoonbank.com/1991/My-question-is-Are-we-making-an-impact/invt/111302
Groundswell of what? This article had an insane delusional quality about it.
***"Just remember that nonviolence is a way of life," said Susan Crane, the co-instructor.
"And that police officers are our brothers and sisters, too," Perry said.
Wages thanked them and left the training seminar, but she struggled to fall asleep later that night. The session had been helpful in a "philosophical kind of way," she said later, but she still had logistical concerns about Monday's protest. Like: "Who will pick me up from jail?"***
Unfortunately this sort of psycho babble has come to be the norm with the pacifist Democrat types. We need different leaders than these if the Movement ever hopes to convince the American people that too much militarism is a bad thing. Excessive faux pacifism and pushing people to vote Democratic Party without thinking constantly has the Movement stalled for now.
Good Posts all.
"I'm against the next war too" ... the best peace sign in one of our Sarasota peace rallies.
I agree we need to stop focusing on Afghanistan and unite on Munich's idea "It is time to end the hegemony, and to promote Peace around the Globe."
Even if that protest only got a few more demonstrators and writers, it would be worth the effort. This is what we want and war is not the answer period.
In my opinion if the message is the best, it doesn't matter as much how many have to travel across the country to get ignored or arrested.
Just a few with signs locally, in enough places helps lead to a groundswell.
There is a solid connection of no peace, no universal healthcare, the war economy and the planet's toxic condition... and this was true before Afghanistan and will be so after.
A few dozen protesters in Washington is indicative of the abissmal apathy among Americans. Too busy with facebook and watching teevee and shopping to give a shit about their country plundering to world for profit and power and every single one of their "elected representatives" taking money from contractors and insurance companies!
Oh, well, where's the nearest Starbucks? I need a Latte' and to check my Email...
Peace marches are not getting us anywhere.
They need to be freaked out. Embarassed.
A good old bloodthirsty War Rally might fit the bill.
Imagine throngs of loud, boisterous, gun waving, warmongers on display for the world to see.
Chanting slogans by a deranged and damaged population.
Crazy shit like; War, war, we love war! Every day just give us more!
Or how about; Kill, kill, kill 'em all! When they're all dead we'll kill some more!
A frenzied crowd screaming for bloodshed.
Ha! I think they'd shit their pants.
I believe it was the Fugs that had a song with the unforgettable title..."Kill for Peace!"
We could use a young satirical rock group.... "The Mercenaries".
thank google, I found it.
http://www.uulyrics.com/music/fugs/song-kill-for-
peace/video-the-fugs-kill-for-peace/
Kill, kill, kill for peace
Kill, kill, kill for peace
Near or middle or very far east
Far or near or very middle east
Kill, kill, kill for peace
Kill, kill, kill for peace
If you don't like the people
or the way that they talk
If you don't like their manners
or they way that they walk,
Kill, kill, kill for peace
Kill, kill, kill for peace
Great. Thanks Jim.
One economist priced the war's total economic impact at $4 trillion for five years of war. For 75 million 4 person families in the U.S., that's a $53,000 mortgage on every family.
Can your family afford 4 more years of war at the same funding level? That would be like an additional $40,000 mortgage on your house. Don't worry, it's only credit, not real money. Or is that what they said about credit when that bank gave you a subprime mortgage and eventually sucked you and your family dry?
People argue about others wanting "bathroom breaks", that is, a little time out to relieve oneself before doing it in one's pants?
People had some arguments that evidently should not be part of forming anti-war protests with different groups.
I don't think it's fitting, yet, to compare themselves to the movements of Gandhi and Rev. MLK Jr, who had the 1-million man march. The movement Gandhi started and lead in India was HUGE, if what I learned of it is true. There hasn't been comparable sizes for protests in the U.S. regarding the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, probably none regarding the criminal coup d'etat and the extreme related crimes of the U.S., France, Canada, and gangster UN "peacekeepers" in Haiti; and so on. But it'd be good if the protests can become really large in the US. We can at least hope they will.
Organize local Oct. 17th actions, build to March bi-coastal demonstrations: www.natatassembly.org Maybe those who marched in 2003 and 2004, will make the effort once again once they see no change is a coming.