Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A Costly US-Mexico Border Wall, in Both Dollars and Deaths
Securing the United States's border from illegal immigrants, terrorists and weapons of mass destruction "continues to be a major challenge," says the United States Government Accountability Office in a new report. It is also proving to be expensive in both lives and money.
Immigrants hide from a border patrol vehicle while waiting a chance to cross into the United States at the border fence on the outskirts of the Tijuana September 19, 2009. Mexico's violent drug gangs are increasingly kidnapping illegal migrants for ransom and forcing them to carry narcotics into the United States as they muscle into the lucrative trade of smuggling people across the border. Picture taken September 19, 2009. (REUTERS/Jorge Duenes) In dollar terms, the outlay is substantial. Every time someone
breaks a hole in the U.S.-Mexico border wall, it costs about $1,300 to
repair. The estimated cost of maintaining the 661-mile (1,058 km)
double-layered fence along part of its 2,000-mile (3,000 km) border
with Mexico over the next 20 years is $6.5 billion, the GAO report
says.
That is on top of the $3.7 billion allocated to the Department of Homeland Security's Secure Border Initiative since 2005 to build a system of fencing, lighting, sensors, cameras and radars to keep out job-hungry immigrants, terrorists and smugglers.
While border agents say the wall is a tool that helps them protect the United States, the GAO report found that U.S. Customs and Border Protection cannot accurately determine the fence's impact on improving border security, suggesting the money might not be well spent.
"What a waste in resources and creativity ," said Jorge Mario Cabrera Valladares of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA). "Our tax dollars are being wasted on an ineffective, old strategy instead of urgently working on serious, long term, workable immigration reform," he said.
Since the attacks on New York and Washington of Sept. 11, 2001, political pressure for tighter border controls has grown sharply and supporters of the border wall argue it is effective in keeping unwanted foreigners out.
But some border experts say the wall does not stop those trying to get into the United States and only makes it more dangerous, greatly raising the fees charged by people smugglers who charge up to $2 billion every year in Arizona alone.
Some 5,600 people have died trying to cross into the United States since the U.S. government under President Bill Clinton dramatically increased border security in 1994 with Operation Gatekeeper and the first stretch of fence between San Diego and Tijuana.
That is according to a study by the American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego and Imperial Counties and Mexico's National Commission on Human Rights (CNDH), based on Mexico's foreign ministry and media reports, who say the death of migrants is an international humanitarian crisis.
Before the stepped-up enforcement operations, experts say most deaths were due to traffic accidents as migrants dashed across freeways in border areas. Today, most die from hypothermia in the desert or by drowning in the Rio Grande and irrigation canals.
The U.S. Border Patrol's body count for border crossers this year points to the continued dangers. While the U.S. recession has caused a sharp drop in arrests on the borderline, Customs and Border Protection has reported 416 deaths so far in 2009. That compares with 390 last year and 398 in 2007.
U.S. President Barack Obama has pledged to push comprehensive immigration reform, including a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, but the issue has little lawmaker support as Americans lose jobs in the recession.
(Additional reporting by Tim Gaynor)



18 Comments so far
Show All"What a waste in resources and creativity ," said Jorge Mario Cabrera Valladares of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA). Our tax dollars are being wasted on an ineffective, old strategy"
Mr Valladares is absolutey correct. The border wall is a waste of time and money. Amost anyone living on the border can tell you that, its a photo op. Molly Ivins and her friends proved it back in 91 by going over a 30 ft. wall I think it was in 35 seconds themselves. Its the agents and patrols that count.
"instead of urgently working on serious, long term, workable immigration reform,"
Mr. Valledares is absolutely incorrect. Theere is nothing wrong with our immigration laws except procedures that make it expensive to benefit the lawyers, we take more immigrants than anyone, we allow more legal foreign workers than anyone and we have plenty of legal work programs available for intermittent labor needs. To say that we need reform is a lie.
"we take more immigrants than anyone"
actually, costa rica has more undocumented immigrants than any country in the america's
last i checked it was like 20-25%
Per capita I hope you mean? If they have more than more than 20 million illegals, lord help them!
But I was speaking of legal immigrants that enter according to our laws. Illegals don't enter into a discussion of our immuigration laws.
20-25% of their population are migrants.... whether documented or undocumented who knows.
but if it is anything like the USA, one can only imagine.
It's an obscenity--planned with racism and hatred as the doundation--and, ironically, constructed by the very folks it was designed to keep out!
It wasn't constructed with racism and hatred, it was simply built by a dumb bunch of politicians in Washington who want to postpone solving the problem, but "prove" they are "doing something" If they had listend to folks on the border, on both sides telling how stupid tit was they wouldn't have wasted a ton of money.
My God, theres a lady around the San Antonio arewa of the border whose family has owned her land since the 1840's, awarded to his family for his service in the Alamo along with many other Hispanic Texicans as I undestand it....these idiots are proposing to run the fence directly through the middle of her property. Shes giving em hell though.
The fence signifies only stupidity, which Washington seems to have more of than any other government.
TM: Sorry, but it's racism and hatred driving that stupidity.
The Berlin Wall came down twenty years ago this week.
The Berlin Wall was breached on November 9, 1989. I don't get your timeline...
my error - not the first - I must have misheard the radio report.
(9th of november - hey! - another 9/11!)
Only israhell and the US government build these damn security fences. The US is even building them in Iraq. How funny that both nations responsible for all the misery in the world today, are living in constant fear.
isn't illegal, and, therefore, cheap, labor an integral part of our domestic economic infrastructure? without it, a number of industries would no longer be financially viable...
pardon me while I choke on this last sentence, my own, insofar as it implies 'fair market'...
obviously, as mentioned by others, we already have many related laws, including laws against employing illegals...laws that are rarely, if ever, enforced...
the gut-busting hypocrisy is pretending 'we' don't want 'them' here, when 'we' really do...'we' do this with so many subjects...this hypocrisy makes any discussion of this issue a travesty...as if Congress is capable of anything else...like the war on drugs, it wouldn't be surprising to find the same folks crying the loudest about the problem are the ones making the money on the cheap labor of illegal backs...
"it wouldn't be surprising to find the same folks crying the loudest about the problem are the ones making the money on the cheap labor of illegal backs..."
Those are the folks. And their shills. You've got it.
Cheap labor that stays home hurts too - and all the money spent on arms and killing to make it stay cheap.
For a long time I didn't mind buying foreign product. I had the idea that I was helping foreign labor, and it's not like foreign labor doesn't deserve help.
Mostly I helped their owners and killers.
Enough.
I can't see through all the dodges and the smoke-screen of corporate pseudonyms every time I buy a T-shirt.
Better union. Better local, where possible, and transparent at least.
I wonder how much cheaper it would be to help Mexico re-establish its agricultural sector, the sector that our agribusiness folks undermined by flooding the Mexican market with cheap beans and corn until they had driven 15 million Mexican farmers out of business. The now-unemployed farmers desperately seek work here in order to support their families, no matter how dangerous the trip North might be.
If we helped Mexican farmers purchase land and get their farms started, the problem of tens of thousands of "illegals" would disappear and Mexican farmers could resume their normal lives.
I think that far too many of you have not seen this from the full perspective; other wise your postings would reflect a much more varied set of references.
Here's one for consideration.
The Mexican people are able to help build the fence with their labor. Being in poor communities these dollars, (no matter how paltry they would compare to USA wages) are very needed economic 'stimulus'. In additon to this, the 'criminal element on the Mexican side of the 'fence', now have a central location that they can 'avoid'---and avoid any conflict with US Law enforcement. This is important to understand since the resources that are going into building the fence, could have been used in more 'mobile patrols' and most likely more effective. But there would be not FENCE and no jobs or money and the criminal element will still be around.
So lets review this for just a short moment.
Since I have not heard any complaints from the Mexican side I am forced to at least consider that they have few if any.
The Americans are spending money to build a wall that will keep very few Mexicans from going north but is helping with badly needed cash and jobs and many other amenities.
And, add all of this to the very real fact that the FENCE will be very effective in keeping the Americans ON THE OTHER SIDE, and not on the Mexican side.
With the criminal element already in Mexico taking such a toll, it would be catastrophic to have Americans on that side as well; they are just as dangerous and deadly as the Mexican criminals, and they have more 'stuff'. Just ask people every where the Americans go, they leave death and destruction behind them, along with homeless and hungry widows orphans and elderly.
Now when you look at it that way:
If I were a Mexican I would hope they would build a FENCE from Shore to Shore----Gracia's ----
"If the USA were another nation the USA would invade the USA to keep the world safe' and they would be justified."
There are a LOT of complaints from the Mexican side, primarily from 3 groups:
1. The Mexican government, which is posturing and claiming anti-Mexican bias in reference to NAFTA--but which also hopes the wall doesn't work as unemployment is sky high here, and according to the organizations that measure and predict that stuff, Mexico (with so far this year a negative growth in GNP to the tune of almost 10%) will account for between 25% and 30% of the jobs lost in the entire region of Latin America due to the crisis.
2. The poor campesinos whose lives were destroyed by NAFTA and by the Mexican government and whose only hope for their families is to cross the border and pick lettuce or grapes or whatever--or scrub toilets in Taco Bell.
3. The narcotrafficantes, as the wall makes the swift dispatching of their product a little more problematic.
Unfortunately, there will not be enough money made by the Mexicans building the wall to offset the loss of Mexico's agricultural sector.
In 50 years a Mexican official will say: "To the Supreme Commander & Leader For Life of the US Government, Tear Down That Wall!"