Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Scientists Uncover New Ocean Threat from Plastics
Scientists have identified a new source of chemical pollution released by the huge amounts of plastic rubbish found floating in the oceans of the world. A study has found that as plastics break down in the sea they release potentially toxic substances not found in nature and which could affect the growth and development of marine organisms.
Plastic pollution is not just unsightly but it could be to toxic to humans and animals. (Photo: The Independent) Until now it was thought that plastic rubbish is relatively stable chemically and, apart from being unsightly, its principle threat to living creatures came from its ability to choke or strangle any animals that either got caught in it or ingested it thinking it was food.
But the latest research suggests that plastic is also a source of dissolved substances that can easily become widely dispersed in the marine environment. Many of these chemicals are believed to toxic to humans and animals, the scientists said.
The scale of plastic pollution in the sea has only been widely recognised in recent years when sailing yachts reported vast areas of ocean, such as an area estimated to be twice the size of Texas in the North Pacific, that seem to be permanently covered in a layer of floating marine litter caught up in swirling ocean currents or gyres.
Some of the items were found to be many decades old, suggesting that the plastic took a long time to degrade. However, a study by Katsuhiko Saido at Nihon University in Chiba, Japan, has found that plastics degrade relatively quickly in the conditions and temperatures that were designed to simulate the environment of the open ocean.
"Plastics in daily use are generally assumed to be quite stable. We found that plastic in the ocean actually decomposes as it is exposed to the rain and sun and other environmental conditions, giving rise to yet another source of global contamination that will continue into the future," Dr Saido said.
"To date, no studies have been conducted on plastic decomposition at low temperature in the environment owing to the mistaken conception that plastic does not decompose. The present study was conducted to clarify that drift plastic does indeed decompose to give rise to hazardous chemicals in the ocean," he said.
The scientists found that when plastics decompose in the ocean they release a range of chemicals, such as bisphenol A and substances known as polystyrene-based (PS) oligomers, which are not found naturally. Bisphenol A has been implicated in disrupting the hormonal system of animals.
A common form of plastic rubbish is styrofoam, which soon gets crushed into small pieces in the sea. However, it also releases substantial quantities of a toxic substances called styrene monomer, which is known to cause cancer, as well as styrene dimers and trimer, which are suspected of being carcinogenic. The trimer also breaks down into the toxic monomer form.
Findings from the study were released yesterday at the American Chemical Society meeting in Washington. Dr Saido said that samples of seawater collected from the Pacific Ocean were found to be contaminated with up to 150 parts per million of some of these components of plastic decomposition.
"This study clearly shows new micro-pollution by compounds generated by plastic decomposition to be taking place out of sight in the ocean. Thus, marine debris plastics in the ocean will certainly give rise to new sources of global contamination that will persist long into the future," he said.
It is estimated that there could be hundreds of millions of tons of plastic rubbish floating in the world's oceans. In Japan alone, it is calculated that 150,000 tons of plastic is washed up on its shores each year.



25 Comments so far
Show AllRetool the military for cleanup operations. At some point the fact that our commonality on this planet is electro-bio-chemical will open eyes to the further fact that eyes are closed. The west has being driving brute force without listening much less hearing, acting without contemplating the world beyond its mirrors.
The west is no longer a geographic designation - it describes death thinking it is life and demanding that all kneel before its projections.
Why use the military? Why not use this as an opportunity to put able-bodied, unemployed people to work?
I've been seeing articles about this island of plastic for years and not one of them has addressed the issue of cleaning it up.
good question. of all the unemployed and underemployed people i personally know (i'm one myself), i'm sure that given a new industry...an ecologically intelligent and focused industry focused on retooling and reskilling for bioremediation would have great appeal. i hate to think of all the young people languishing in the limbo of our economic wasteland, their passions and talents eager for the 'green jobs' and 'hope' and 'change' promised..... i see them now and then on street corners working to muster up the enthusiasm to get people to sign up to fund greenpeace projects or attempting to outfit the poor of my city with bikes as they struggle to pool their resources and resilience and adapt to a world very unlike their parents adapted to at their age, but i also see more and more of them either unemployed or hanging onto jobs where they serve lattes to their fellow working-class-heroes downtown or mind-numbing retail jobs scrimping together enough to attend a community college course designed for the world we lived in a decade ago that likely will leave them in the same spot when they graduate... the concept of RIGHT LIVELIHOOD is one that has for way too long been run roughshod over by the pervasive profit-motive focused only on monetary accumulation. even nonprofits have to devote enormous time, energy and budget on fundraising to do work that is sorely needed... to UNdo the damage done by mindless consumption and corporate profiteering, waste and injustice.... i wonder how many millions the world over are as frustrated/paralyzed by the paradox of a stubbornly stuck employment paradigm of waste and mass production of questionable value as the lines of job-seekers or unemployment-collectors in my city are...while the karmic baggage of ignorant junk accumulation, piracy and exploitation keep piling up to fowl not just land and sea but our airwaves and ultimately, our hearts and minds? at the moment, i'm not able-bodied but hope to be by late fall, and i would be immensely relieved and grateful to find work that had actual meaning and wasn't just one more soul-crushing 'part of the problem'. i see timid movement in 'transition towns initiatives' taking place and people in my city growing gardens who never did before, but there needs to be an initiative on the part of government to pay attention to the commons and not trust the 'free market' to somehow magically, organically correct the ills it itself has created. intelligently dealing with the aftermath of the concerted dismantling of the commons (on steroids during the reagan, clinton and bush administrations) to accommodate the feeding frenzy of the privatizing empire-building military/industrial/media complex is THE challenge of our time and our species. swords into ploughshares= wasteful idiocy into localized sanity/healing. work that is REAL.
Put this article together with the one about the polluting food processors and the mercury in our fish and it's pretty obvious that we are destroying the very biosphere which sustains us.
I seriously doubt, given the level of insanity in the US electorate and the degree of corporate control of our media, that anything can be done to improve these conditions.
q
"No one could have imagined these chemicals affecting living things in any negative way."
Scientist / executive / politician / consumer, testifying at the Congressional "Apocalypse Commission" hearings.
Forget it.
Cleaning up the oceans would be Socialism.
That does not fit our "every man for himself" US philosophy.
So what if we destroy the planet.
There must be others out there.
Earth First!
We will mine the other planets later.
So what about all of the plastic in landfills. Aren't they also breaking down and possibly going into the ground water and all of the other plants, animals, us???
The coming "apocalypse" will be environmental.
Global Start Date: September 22, 2012...all the changes we want, but a big one underlies...
property ownership and housing...
if we don't resolve how people can cease working at their 'job' and begin devoting their time and effort to cleanups and new replantings, which is precisely what I would love to see, they must be able to feel comfortable with the fact that their daily living situation (primarily water and shelter, as food sourcing will absolutely have to change to local, but also medicine) will not be yanked out from under them at gunpoint...
immediately, that would mean some sort of socialized approach to mortgage relief and shared structures, along with the removal of much of the pavement covering the land we need to replant...what we cannot afford is to NOT act out of fear (and I think this underlies the healthcare debate) of losing our homes to the bankers, which will lead to us doing precisely that, one by one, as our industries collapse along with our health...
we must defend our common interest as living entities...we are entitled to the basics of shelter, water and food...we must remove them from the economic prison currently holding them hostage, and return them to the world of natural, individual engagement...
unfortunately, current systems of control, (police, courts, jails) favor protecting 'owned' property, and our political system and representatives ~ well, what a sad, sick joke that is ~ which means that changing the way land is viewed and acquired will probably not happen via meetings...I hope it can be so, but I don't expect that hope to be realized...we will need to form local alliances against the powers that be, right down to the defense of our homes against our local gunpackers when they come to force us out...
we're gonna need to do with much, much less, and electricity is right at the top...let's get those gardens growing!
Gee, no shit.
sorry if I sound like Obviousman...I just don't hear many addressing the huge issue of property ownership...the impact on behavior, and the need to change such...yet...
I guess CD isn't quite socialist.
the 'territorial imperative'/'virtue of selfishness'/'ownership society' mindset is pretty entrenched and enabled but minds and hearts do have a tendency to humble and open as they journey through adversity...and i hate to sound doom n gloomy, but i've a feeling we've got alot of adversity coming our way after centuries of willful ignorance of colonization's fallout on our ecological and social underpinnings/structures. rome wasn't built in a day and didn't collapse overnight either. both individually and collectively there need to be alternatives created to replace the commodification of everything from water to human relationships to intellectual 'property'. necessity is the mother of invention and not everyone recognizes necessity when they see it. heck, even recognition is just a first step toward the sobriety we need to get through what's coming. i wish i could be a brilliant inventor....all i can think to do is garden, try extricating myself from various addictions (the private car, channel-surfing in front of a television, processed foods, cynicism to name a few of mine) and try to be patient and compassionate with we bozos on this here bus as well as be open and willing when opportunities arise to step in and be useful as an agent of positive change in localizing our livelihoods, and coming up with more creative, cooperative ways to live with other people and heal/learn from our all-too-human march of folly (and occasional brilliance).
Excellent comment, M. It is the obvious, the right thing to do. But I suspect that someone, somewhere will have to be able to convince shareholders that they can profit from the investment. Or a government beaurocracy will have to be set up....don't we already have one called the "super fund"?
Now if we could just revise our priorities and get out of the war business, just think what we could accomplish! There is a political solution after all.....throw the bums out!
Another aspect is that bis phenol maybe able to act as an effective birth control agent. For people that probably be ok, based on our track record of protecting the environment. But what about the fish? They haven't done anything to deserve such punishment>
Maybe we can get someone like Greenpeace or the Sea Shepherd to trawl these plastics from the gyres in the open ocean where it collects and take it in for recycling.
Plastic manufacturers should be assessed a recycling tax. Plastic imports should have to pay this tax.
It's at leas the size of Texas, down almost to the molecular level, and only God knows how deep. There's no way to clean it up. We're stuck with it forever.
How are we going to clean it up?
Troll with nets?
Then you kill everything the net picks up!
I agree with putting the unemployed to work cleaning up our mess, you really get a perspective of how clueless the masses are when you do this kind of work.
Only one thing comes to My Mind.
'Mission Accomplished'.
People in the Western Hemisphere should become red in the face for their profiteering on the expense of the entire biomass.
The Corporate World shows its real face in the trash carpets of the gyres, in mountain top removal, unchecked militarism, law enforcement and and ever increasing stream of new ordinances that criminalize even more people to be fed into the prison system. Works until there is no more air to breathe.
To the argument about who should do what about it I can certainly agree that taking away the toys of the militarist boys and equip them with little screens to syphon through the carpet would be a more appropriate use of the 'armed forces'. Arm them with kitchen screens and ship 'em out onto the ocean of thrash.
On the topic of 'work'. It is beyond Me that there are still a majority of people out here and there, that have not gotten 'It' yet. Following the stories about what 'industry' or company could give them a job. Even the notion of 'looking for a job' shows how wrong they've all got It.
You don't look for a job. You don't need a job. You are the 'Job'. You Are more than You can Do. Therefor it is nonsensical to rely on the phantasy stories coming out of D.C. about 'creating jobs'. If one waits for that to happen, one will starve to death.
We all have abilities and qualifications that actually scream for expression, manifestation and creativity.
You Make Your Own 'Job', You Be Your Own 'Job'. The whole paradigm about work is for the bottom back part. To participate in slavery is the same than to participate in fascism or any other overarching, of religion derived principle.
Nobody should forget that the whole misery that We are looking at right now, has the handwriting of the Catholic Church on it. That counts for the last two thousand years as much as for the 21st Century. Work is fake. It is religious humbug. Used to control the masses, the people. Adopted by the 'worldly' leaders to be implied to the whole planet. You don't have to believe in god to be a 'victim' of his followers.
The 'real' life is the one where One takes the responsibility for One's own Life and acts accordingly. Make Your Own 'Work'. Create an existence outside of Corpotopia or simply put:
Don't Be A Spaceball.
Believe That You Can Change Your Beliefs.
Yada yadw yada -- Its all because and about overpopulation -- stupid.
The "sacred cow" that is never talked about.
Planet
Loses
As
Suicidal
Technology
Immeasurably
Contaminates
Our legacy to the future.Tony
Alas. Here in 'very green' Seattle we can't even pass a 20-cent 'penalty fee' for not bringing your own non-plastic bag to the grocery store. We were outflanked by Big Business, which lobbied the media w/ 10x the money the fee-supporters could muster. One defense (of killing the bill) was that it unfairly singles out the poor: right. Tell me how many 'poor' people aren't going to invest 99 cents for a canvas bag after incurring say, $1.20 in penalty fees??
It's going to take a very big wind to turn this very large ship around.
- first blog, btw (I think this is a blog!)
It might have been mentioned before but can't all this plastic be used as a resource. Certainly there would be a net energy benefit from harvesting it and using it as fuel in a state-of-the-art, non-polluting incenerator?
Most governments won't look to the long term in order not to upset electorates. So, without a large informed middle class controlling their own destiny, as in so many European countries (I don't include Britain) there will be no change and our seas will become increasingly filthy. Second and third world countries, and ships, are the worst polluters of course, and nothing will be done about these.
Plastic is toxic.
We eat the fish that is becoming increasingly genetically damaged. We use plastics to contain and package our food. We seem to be developing ever more bizarre conditions which barely existed fifty years ago. There are links, but we will do little, and the worst polluters will do nothing.
There are too many greedy, indifferent and myopic people on this planet, and far too many poor, hungry, uneducated and totally ignorant ones.
Shame.
Not to worry.The World has been here for billions of years and has been attacked by comets,volcanoes,fires and who knows what else,so if the new invasion destroys human life as we know it after the human destruction the earth will rejuvenate itself and go merrily on its way.