EPA Approves California Pollution Rule
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Environmental Protection Agency gave the go-ahead Tuesday for California to impose stringent regulations on greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles, setting the stage for a national requirement expected to mirror the state's effort.
California has been fighting the federal EPA over the issue for years.
The EPA decision Tuesday to granted California a formal waiver clears the way for the state to implement a 2004 state pollution law to combat global warming. The Bush administration repeatedly rejected the waiver request, which was required by the federal Clean Air Act.
The California regulation requires automakers to increase the fuel economy of cars and trucks sold in the state by 40 percent over the next seven years, to an average of 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016.
The EPA decision had been expected since President Barack Obama in May announced plans to implement a national requirement similar to the one in California. But the federal waiver for California sets the stage for the national program. At least 14 states already have said they want to follow California's lead once the EPA gives a green light.
Automakers fought California on its emission requirements for years in the courts and in lobbying the Bush administration in Washington. But last May, automakers went along with Obama's proposal for national regulations to speed the development of more fuel efficient automobiles and trucks.
Higher fuel efficiency reduces the amount of carbon dioxide, the leading greenhouse gas linked to climate change, that is released from tailpipes.
On Tuesday, automakers reacted cautiously to the EPA decision.
"We are hopeful the granting of this waiver will not undermine the enormous efforts put forth to create the national program," said Dave McCurdy, president of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers in a statement. He said a national requirement to cut greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles "moves us towards a policy that ensures that consumers in all 50 states have access to highly fuel efficient vehicles at an affordable price."
Auto companies had worried about a patchwork of stage regulations on climate-altering vehicle emissions.
But environmentalists said the decision to give California the go-ahead for putting into place its emission requirements was long overdue and essential for developing the national program.
"This is putting the federal seal of approval on California's leadership in cleaning up global warming pollution from our cars, SUVs, pickups and minivans," said David Doniger, director of the Climate Center at the Natural Resources Defense Council. He said the action was needed to implement the "peace treaty" between car makers and those seeking tougher fuel economy standard reflected by Obama's announcement in May.
Obama proposed a requirement to increase the fuel economy of cars and small trucks to 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016, an improvement of about 40 percent over what vehicles achieve on average today, similar to what California has wanted. Congress in 2007 had called for a 35 mpg requirement by 2020.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
3 Comments so far
Show AllFor all those whom rail that there is no difference between Obama & McCain / Bush, this is your rebuke. As a Californian, I am glad this small first step is finally occurring after years of blockage by Dubya, Cheney, & Co.
`tis a bit late. Arnie has 'Terminated' California.
This is a NON-STORY about a NON-SOLUTION to Global Warming. A classical example of "inside-the-beltway" type thinking, hugely influenced by lobbyists.
This ruling requires automakers to provide a fleet average increase of 40% in mileage by 2016, but only in California. That's only for NEW cars. What about the EXISTING ones?
Assuming that they are successful in replacing half the cars on the roads in California in seven years, this is equivalent to only a 20-25% reduction in emissions, and only a 10-15% reduction in the interim.
Furthermore, it is an ERROR to think that every other state, or even most states, will adopt the "California Plan" any time soon. Thus, overall, we're talking about a reduction of less than 2-3% nationally by 2016 in carbon emissions!
WHOOP-DE-DOO!! WHAT A LICK WERE GOING TO GIVE TO THAT OLE GLOBAL WARMING DEMON, YOO BETCHA!
HOW MUCH LONGER WILL WE, THE PUBLIC, CONTINUE TO ALLOW OURSELVES TO BE BAMBOOZLED BY GOVERNMENT AND THE MSM, WHO WOULD LIKE US TO BELIEVE THEY ARE DOING SOMETHING GOOD AND SIGNIFICANT!!
If one were REALLY interested in making progress in solving the problem, we would recognize that, not only do the mileage requirements need increasing over that period, AT LEAST HALF THE CARS CURRENTLY ON THE ROAD IN URBAN/SUBURBAN AREAS, ALSO NEED TO BE ELIMINATED by then. And not just in California.
How is this possible?
Easy--by starting in medium-sized isolated cities, you prohibit single-occupancy vehicles to enter beyond a certain radius of the city center, say 10 miles. You designate vehicle transfer stations. Rides would be shared to all points within the area. Special hybrids autos with 3 or 4 rows of seats, two-abreast, would be ordered and deployed. Safety zones for loading and unloading on the driver's side would be needed.
You would only need about one of these for every five current vehicles. ID's would be issued to Bonded Drivers. Maybe they could all be women, to discourage predation.
Risky, you say? How "risky" do you consider "certain death" by age 50 for your grandchildren.
All "risk assessments" are comparative.
Also--think "PLAN B" for electrical power generation.