Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Cheney Was Key in Clearing CIA Interrogation Tactics
The vice president says that the use of waterboarding was appropriate and that the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, should stay open until 'the end of the war on terror.'
WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney said Monday that he was directly involved in approving severe interrogation methods used by the CIA, and that the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, should remain open indefinitely.
The Guantanamo 'war on terror' detention center should remain open indefinitely, Vice President Richard Cheney, seen here in october 2008 in Washington, DC, told ABC News in an interview Monday, while also defending the harsh interrogation method known as waterboarding. (AFP/Getty Images/File/Mark Wilson) Cheney's remarks on Guantanamo appear to put him at odds with President Bush, who has expressed a desire to close the prison, although the decision is expected to be left to the incoming administration of President-elect Barack Obama.
Cheney's comments also mark the first time that he has acknowledged playing a central role in clearing the CIA's use of an array of controversial interrogation tactics, including a simulated drowning method known as waterboarding.
"I was aware of the program, certainly, and involved in helping get the process cleared," Cheney said in an interview with ABC News.
Asked whether he still believes it was appropriate to use the waterboarding method on terrorism suspects, Cheney said: "I do."
His comments come on the heels of disclosures by a Senate committee showing that high-level officials in the Bush administration were intimately involved in reviewing and approving interrogation methods that have since been explicitly outlawed and that have been condemned internationally as torture.
Soon after the Sept. 11 attacks, Cheney said, the CIA "in effect came in and wanted to know what they could and couldn't do. And they talked to me, as well as others, to explain what they wanted to do. And I supported it."
Waterboarding involves strapping a prisoner to a tilted surface, covering his face with a towel and dousing it to simulate the sensation of drowning.
CIA Director Michael V. Hayden has said that the agency used the technique on three Al Qaeda suspects in 2002 and 2003. But the practice was discontinued when lawyers from the Department of Justice and other agencies began backing away from their opinions endorsing its legality.
Cheney has long defended the technique. But he has not previously disclosed his role in pushing to give the CIA such authority.
Cheney's office is regarded as the most hawkish presence in the Bush administration, pushing the White House toward aggressive stances on the invasion of Iraq and the wiretapping of U.S. citizens.
Asked when the Guantanamo Bay prison would be shut down, Cheney said, "I think that that would come with the end of the war on terror." He went on to say that "nobody can specify" when that might occur, and likened the use of the detention facility to the imprisonment of Germans during World War II.
"We've always exercised the right to capture the enemy and hold them till the end of the conflict," Cheney said.
The administration's legal case for holding detainees indefinitely has been eroded by a series of court rulings. Obama has pledged to close the facility, which still holds 250 prisoners.
Cheney's remarks are the latest in a series of interviews granted by Bush and senior officials defending their decisions as they prepare to leave office. Bush recently said his main regret was that U.S. spy agencies had been so mistaken about Iraq's alleged weapons programs. Cheney and the Bush administration have been accused of "cherry-picking" intelligence to support going to war with Iraq.
Cheney said that those mistakes didn't matter, and that the U.S. invasion was justified by Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein's ability to reestablish destructive weapons programs. The vice president brushed off a series of findings questioning that view, including a 2006 Senate report concluding that Hussein lacked a "coherent effort" to develop nuclear weapons and had only a "limited capability" for chemical weapons.
"This was a bad actor and the country's better off, the world's better off, with Saddam gone, and I think we made the right decision in spite of the fact that the original [intelligence] was off in some of its major judgments," he said.
- Posted in



142 Comments so far
Show AllHistory will judge Dick Cheney as the Cardinal Richelieu of American politics.
www.wunderman-comics.com
I was thinking Rasputin.
I think Cheney is kinda letting the world know now who really ran the show without coming right out with it.
Rasputin had nowhere the influence over policy to the extent that Cheney & Cardinal Richelieu did.
www.wunderman-comics.com
Exactly, and the reason is... he is signaling to Bush that if you don't pardon me for torture and all the rest, I will be forced to tell the rest.
The first and most important thing Obama has to do is recognize the World Court!
And thus Cheney walks away sneering, untouched, and untouchable. Pity.
qblman is right. No one will be held accountable for any of the 'mishaps' that occurred during the last two terms as Everyone person in Congress would be implicated. Except for a few, the majority sat on their collective butts and made no attemps to stop any of the madness, therefore making them all complicite by their indifference. And, they keep getting reelected for their incompetence.. Go Figure...
So why are we content (or worse yet, outraged) with someone throwing shoes at these guys? My compassion for the Madame De Farges of this world grows with each passing hour.
.Though I think it a terrible way to believe, it may be that the only justice obtainable is exactly the way you intimate. I cannot knit however.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
Paragraph 2 makes me want to scream. The first thing I do when I see a story posted, is check for the source/origin. There's a good "diary" (article)on the Home page of DailyKos now about the PR around torture and how it is being made into a political football, if the Republicans can do so. Reread Glenn Greenwald's article below for reminders on media "coverage".
When I heard Cheney's soundbite admissions on DemocracyNow headlines this morning, my thought was, he's saying "so...", thumbing his nose, again. While at the same time, pushing "the party line".
"So?"
mahannah:I was typing "so" in mine, as you were and yours went up while I was editing. I bet many more had same reaction.
Why aren't American's marching in the streets to impeach & imprison this guy & his buddies?!?!! Even the level of comment on this story is just, "ho hum". WHY is all of America NOT outraged??!! I really don't get it.
Most of America does not know these things. Those who do are told it from a Media who backs him, so the sugar-coat it. There is no American populace with a real voice anymore. Propaganda has achieved more than anyone could have ever imagined.
“Show me a man who doesn't read the papers and I'll show you someone who is uninformed. show me a man who reads the papers and I will show you a man who is misinformed.”
-- Mark Twain
Because they want to be sure that the Government get the information that the terrorists have about future plots and keep America safe.
I bet you also believe in innocent until proven guilty but the average American knows that these people are put in Guantanamo because they are terrorists. They been told that time and time again.
And besides, no one wants them, right? Not even their home countries want them. I wonder why? Could it be, perhaps, that THEY WERE F*$#ING SOLD INTO SLAVERY!
Jarhead/ Has this idiot ever thought about how much better the world will be without him? Perhaps pleading guilty will save him from yhr death penalty and he will only get life in a three foot cell. Much too kind form him and his smirk.
Unfortunately it will take more than President-to-be Obama's first term to repair the additional damage which this public statement has done to our already battered reputation in the rest of the world. Regrettably his stated intent to kill more people in Afghanistan and Pakistan is not helpful either.
This "battered reputation" premise needs to go away. For those of you who don't know any better, those of you who believe that "we've lost our moral standing" or "WHATEVER OTHER GRANDIOSE STATEMENT YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO PUT INTO QUOTES ABOUT THE U.S." is a childish fantasy, an illusion. Your thinking is, at best, Ptolemaic. That's immediate, IMMEDIATE, post WWII thinking. Since then, as you and you and you and your neighbors, and your children and their children have been devolving exponentially, more stupid than the last, the world was split into North and South. We never had such standing. We never had such morals. The truth will always surface. For example, just like it's surfacing now. "Americans don't torture." "So what?!" Seriously. So what if we do. We always have. We just don't give a F$%K about it anymore. Perhaps Cheney was describing someone else in their last throes. Take a look in the mirror, friends, neighbors, co-workers, relatives. Yup. It's us.
like the comic strip long ago -- where the character Pogo tells his friend:
"i have met the enemy ....it is US".
where america is or has been all along is:
"she has met the enemy -- it was HERSELF -- she just didn't recognize it".
"should this nation fall...it shall fall not because of foreign enemies or threats, real or imagined....it shall fall because the people are corrupt". -- Benjamin Franklin.
"This was a bad actor and the country's better off, the world's better off, with Saddam gone, and I think we made the right decision in spite of the fact that the original [intelligence] was off in some of its major judgments," he said.
and 3 trillion later.... this world would have been beter off wothout him and the idiot of bush(no capital here)and too bad the shoe didn't hit the target.
AldoinSF
Cheney learned and first practiced his trade in the Reagan administration. Remember them? They convinced homelanders that the government of Nicaragua was a 'threat to national security'. Under Bush II, they applied the same techniques to con the homelanders that Iraq was a threat to our security. Reagan got away with it, his VP even elected to office. Messers Cheney and Bush will get away with it as well.
Cheney is the epitome of a classic Machievellian. Arguably his expertise and greatest skills are those that serve the powerful. To suggest that he and the Bush crew are somehow 'conservatives' is inaccurate if not laughable. They are not for reduced government, a major conservative principle, but for a large government built around national security and imperialism. He is an interesting, if maddening, study in despicable human nature.
Actually it was in the Nixon admin as an aide...
Along with rummy...
The evil bastard only admits it because he knows we have a toothless, spineless Congress and a corporate media that will loyally remain non-committal about any crimes these pigs feel like committing.
Yeah, he's just giving us all the finger and smirking like "yeah, what are YOU going to do about it?"
Thankfully, I believe in karmic law which dictates that HE will be tortured severely in countless future lives until his debt is fully paid.
NotesfromtheEdge
I am shocked! Cheney is deluded, clearly. It is a relief that he is admitting that he approved of torture. And that he doesn't need to be 'waterboarded' to get him to admit it, the easier to prosecute him! Whew! I thought the most difficult part would be to get Dick Cheney to divulge that he was the one, among others in the administration, who approved and/or instigated the 'torture policies'. Time to start reading the Geneva Conventions, and getting clear on the fact that torture is Illegal under US international agreements, and the US's own laws, and therefore, what these people have committed are crimes against humanity. The evidence is all there, 'waterboarding' as torture was done to human beings who had undergone 'extrordinary rendition', and were kidnapped, drugged, and taken either to Guantanamo, Cuba, Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, or any number of other countries, to be tortured.
Step one accomplished. Now onto the indictments! Perhaps Cheney is hoping for a pardon in the next few weeks, and that is his strategy. First you must admit to the crime in order to be pardoned, and then you must make it look like you were psychologically impaired when you committed the crime, in order to make the pardon appear justified. However, pardons will not help in this instance because they will not stick, the crimes are too extensive. Cheney was sane, however, in denial he may have been, as to the ultimate consequences of his {their} policies and unlawfulness.
The bush administration merely thought they could get away with it. Concentrate power in the executive, and do whatever they wanted. They killed and destroyed and raped nations, and destroy people's lives, livelihoods, and economies, and weakened the gene pool of humanity, by using depleted uranium on Iraq and Afghanistan. They have brought the planet that much further into the consequences that are upon us all now, from Global Warming, and the melting of the Poles. The bush administration ignored the real problems caused by burning fossil fuels, and aggressively perpetrated wars for the profit of the 'corporate regime'{yes, you, my friend, have just experienced Fascism, 'Plutocratic Fascism'} to continue extracting fossil fuels from the countries of the mideast at the expense of the real world, the real economy, and the survival of the planet as we know it. But now they, in the bush administration, must be held accountable for the least {and the worst} of their crimes against humanity: TORTURE.
"Perhaps Cheney is hoping for a pardon in the next few weeks, and that is his strategy. First you must admit to the crime in order to be pardoned, and then you must make it look like you were psychologically impaired when you committed the crime, in order to make the pardon appear justified."
"Now, therefore, I, Gerald R. Ford, President of the United States, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from July (January) 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974."
See the full text of Ford's pardon speech at:
http://www.watergate.info/ford/pardon.shtml
Nixon never admitted to committing any crimes. Whether or not he was psychologically impaired I will leave open to speculation. However, he was reported to have walked the hallways of the Whitehouse late at night while raving drunk.
A precedent exists for a president pardoning a former president for any crimes he MAY have committed. Whether a sitting president can pardon a sitting vice president for crimes he may have committed, or has committed, is probably open to question, but not above Bush's cynical approach.
-- EKATON --
Ekaton--
Right example (Presidential pardon), wrong person not Bush, but Obama (in a spirit of bi-partisanship and in order to "get beyond" the present strife and
"moveon.org"). Or he could do a Jimmy Carter (who pardoned the totally unrepentant to this day G. Gordon "Nutcase" Liddy for the same reason).
One of the most revealing parts of the movie "Sicko" was when a Frenchman told Michael Moore, "In your country the people fear the government, but in my country, the government fears the people". For an idea why this is so, google "Robespierre".
Poet
Yeah, thanks. I absolutely blew it in my last paragraph. Of course Obama could pardon anyone he wanted to pardon.
-- EKATON --
There will be no justice. Do not fool yourself. The American Government has gotten away with the worst crimes committed in this country in a long time.
But, Who gaurds the gaurdians?
"Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
--Juvenal
smipypr
A teenager in Athens gets shot by the cops, and the whole city lights up. Cops in the US pump 15 or 20 shots into people. Nothing happens. Years ago, I knew some people who worked for Lucent, during their first series of big layoffs. I asked one of the guys why they weren't dragging the execs out of their homes and beating the crap out of them. The replied "they live in New Jersey." I said, well, go to New Jersey. It seems that over the past few years, people in the US have become so numb they're incapable of indignation. The general population has been successfully divided and conquered. Not that I advocate violence in the streets...it just seems sometimes that everyone else just emerged from their pods.
A true blue conservative till the end, troglodyte principles elevated to lofty traditions that kill, pollute, rape, impoverish, torture and destroy everyone and everything he can.
He's not a 'conservative' - he's a FASCIST !!! These thugs follow NAZI ideology - not conservative philosophy. There is nothing in conservative theory that condones harming other people. Being a true conservative is a legitimate stance, backed by legitimate logic that is every bit as sensible as 'liberal' theories.
By the conservative values taught in my family, I would classify this sort of miscreant as an egregious, vicious, sociopathic criminal. Right-Wing-Wackos like him have given conservatism a bad name - keeping what's good in society is NOT evil, but following fascist ideology is indeed EVIL. Fascism brings only misery, suffering, and death to any society that embraces it. Just because corporations (an amoral entity - Psychopaths R US) took over government instead of the other way around does not change the outcome. This is FASCISM. What conservative in his right mind would want a POLICE STATE???
"he's a FASCIST !!! These thugs follow NAZI ideology"
Read history and you will find that the republican party has been controlled if not founded by communist/fascist/dictator type people since the very beginning.
Rickster
Conservatives Deconstructed
by Joel Bleifuss
In These Times magazine, October 2003
Are they nuts?
Have you ever wondered about those ubiquitous conservatives?
Why do they support tax breaks for the rich when so many of their fellow citizens are in dire straits? Why do they applaud John Ashcroft and his post-9/11 curtailment of civil liberties? Why do they oppose laws that address historic wrongs and enforce constitutionally guaranteed rights? Why do they respond to a societal drug problem with incarceration and expanded prison construction? Why do they gut regulations that are meant to protect the environment? Why do they invest more than half of our tax dollars in the military? Why are they so meanspirited? In other words, why do conservatives do what they do? Are they nuts?
No, not according to a fascinating new study in Psychological Bulletin, "Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition." Conservatives do, however, possess certain psychological traits and motives that no one in their right (or is that left?) mind would want to share.
The study's four authors, John T. Jost, Jack Glaser, Arie W. Kruglanski, and Frank J. Sulloway, write, "People embrace political conservatism (at least in part) because it serves to reduce fear, anxiety and uncertainty; to avoid change, disruption and ambiguity; and to explain, order and justify inequality among groups and individuals." To come to this conclusion the authors examined 88 different psychological studies conducted between 1958 and 2002 that involved 22,818 people from 12 different countries. They boiled that information down into a number of psychological attributes that are closely associated with people who are politically conservative.
Rigid and closed-minded
"Dogmatism has been found to correlate consistently with authoritarianism, political-economic conservatism, and the holding of right wing opinions," write the authors. Conversely, studies have found that conservatives in general have little tolerance for ambiguity. A fact that helps in decoding this statement that George W. Bush made in Genoa, Italy: "I know what I believe and I believe what I believe is right."
Such thinking could explain why the Bush administration officials ignored those intelligence reports that failed to support going to war with Iraq. "[Conservatives'] intolerance of ambiguity can lead people to cling to the familiar, to arrive at premature conclusions, and to impose simplistic clichés and stereotypes," write the authors.
Numerous studies have also shown that conservative policymakers entertain less cognitively complex thoughts than their liberal or moderate counterparts. A study of speeches made in the House of Commons in 1984 found that "the most integratively complex politicians were moderate socialists." Their complexity of thought was found to be significantly higher than that of extreme socialists, moderate conservatives or extreme conservatives. Similarly, in the United States, a study of speeches on the floor of the Senate in 1975 and 1976 found that senators with liberal or moderate voting records exhibited significantly more complex thinking than their conservative counterparts.
continued at:
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Society/Conservatives_Deconstruct.html
Do you think it was a good idea to use just the one brain between Cheney and Dim Son? America is reaping what Cheney has sown; have you checked your retirement fund today? You know who to thank.
Fighting the forces of rather dim lighting wherever they may be found!!
Misplaced comment deleted by author.
.
Protest Shoe Idea:
Someone of stature and prominence, Michael Moore perhaps, who has the ability to promote and co-ordinate a sizable project…
Announces they have set aside a large grassy hill top to receive protest shoes in a symbolic global gesture of distain and contempt from both Americans and anyone worldwide.
The shoes will be received at a safe address, and then placed in the protest pile. After a set time or size of pile the usable shoes would be donated to appropriate cause, or kept and displayed in a Holocaust-style or War Crimes museum.
If a height and final date goal [Inauguration Day?] were set, it would add excitement and generate a lot of free promotional news coverage. My prediction is the word would spread world-wide very quickly. Imagine the stories; poor persons from distant lands using their tiny savings to mail shoes…
Messages of person’s experiences, losses, sadness, anger, etc. because of this Administration’s could be attached or written on the souls, or shoes could be sent in memory of loved ones. Other ideas could be added to make protest even more meaningful.
What a chance to show global unity and restore the world’s downtrodden spirit!
Any one that knows of THE person please pass this idea along.
.
Enough with the simulated drowning already. Waterboarding is drowning, except that, hopefully, the process stops before the victim is actually murdered.
Exactly. Nothing is "simulated". Pouring water down your nose and throat starts the drowning. It doesn't happen instantly; it takes a couple of minutes to drown, by whatever means. For torture, they start the process, make you feel the horrible feeling of drowing--because you are in fact drowning--and then they interrupt the process before you drown--if they get it right. If not, too bad so sad for you: you're dead.
But it's the real thing that is simply interrupted before you die.
"Waterboarding involves strapping a prisoner to a tilted surface, covering his face with a towel and dousing it to simulate the sensation of drowning."
I guess this is technically true, in the same sense that strapping a suspected witch to a ducking stool and repeatedly submerging her in a pond "simulates the sensation of drowning."
Waterboarding simulates the sensation of drowning by a very simple means: by drowning. Asphyxiation is asphyxiation, whether by water going into the lungs or by cellophane over the nose and mouth (supposedly the CIA method).
This "it's only SIMULATED drowning" falsehood has the US media by the short and curlies and refuses to let go. Its intent is to make the torture seem acceptable by implying that its victims are wimps. If we call it "simulated" drowning, it makes it seem like a game of "let's pretend," as if the victim is taking part in some kind of virtual-reality experience.
Call waterboarding what it is: controlled drowning.
You are absolutely correct. I'd like to add the following.
Waterboarding is somewhat more than a cloth over the nose and mouth and pouring water on the cloth. The epiglotis at the back of the throat is also massaged by pushing the cloth through the mouth to the back of the throat in order to accomplish this massage while still pouring water onto the cloth and into the mouth.
I suggest this. Soak a washcloth. Lie flat on your back. Place the washcloth over your mouth. Use two fingers to push the washcloth back to your epiglotis and apply massage as you pour a few more ounces of water onto the washcloth. Now tell me if you think this would constitute torture if you were strapped down, unable to move, and unable to make the person applying this "simulated drowning" stop. Would you tell the "interrogator" (not torturer, since its not torture) anything he wanted to know, or anything he wanted to hear? Is your 16 year old sister a terrorist? Did she blow up that building across the street? Is your mother a whore? Is your father a pedophile? Do you fuck monkeys? Did you set off that IED? No? Do you know who did? Yes? Give us his name and location.
-- EKATON --
He admitted to a crime. Do we really need to wait for Congress? Can't ANY prosecutor press charges?
Under International Law an admission of Guild is all that is needed for the prosecution of crimes against humanity and established law.
Mr. Cheney, being "out of touch" with reality, cannot possibly have thought that he would be prosecuted, but now you and I and others have a surprise for him, as well as G.W.Bush, and the other International Criminals currently in leadership of the United States of America.
A non-profit organization will be formed shortly, with the intent of taking into custody Mr. Cheney as well as the aforementioned members at a facility yet undetermined for the express purpose of delivery to the International Court of Justice, for trial for the crimes committed by this administration.
Until all of the organizational duties have been attended, the enclosed email address is for those who would wish to participate in any way, shape or form.
The future of the United States of America is in the balance, the world is watching and waiting to see what the "people" will do, when their leaders are so arrogant and brazen to admit to participating in crimes that the United States tried others for sixty years ago.
Regardless of what your personal opinions may be in this matter; every citizen of the United States that does not protest these crimes and move to see that trials are conducted in the proper Court of Authority*, should be considered complicit.
Whether they participate in this or other avenues is irrelevant, but participating in some way will show that the individual citizens of the U.S.A. are not willing to have their name associated with these crimes; and have done more than just lend a "voice of protest"; they take action.
* To try these crimes in any other Court than the International Court of Justice would be a mockery of justice that no American could ever expect to outlive, and may very well pass on to their descendants; if the world actually allows the U.S.A. to exist after such a travesty of justice by trying these crimes anywhere else.
Whether you are a Republican, Democrat, Independent, Libertarian, or whether you participate in the political process or not matters little. This is not a political matter; it is a criminal matter.
And one that not only requires an answer, but the proper answer. That can only be attained in the Internatoinal Court of Justice.
more on this later.
nurembergrevisited@gmail.com
Darth Viper understands his role. His role is to encourage evil across the world and discourage honesty, hope, peace, harmony and happiness across the world. He knows that keeping people addicted and dependent on material convenience/luxury best fuels the empire. He knows that showing the least bit of compassion feeds the leftist ideology of universal equity, and starves the rightist ideology of hierarchical class aggression. Darth Viper has some 299 out of 300 million Americans on his side. Although they are torn between their addiction to petro-fired luxury/convenience and obvious ethical standards, they choose luxury/convenience over ethics when push comes to shove, consciously engineered by Darth Viper for eight years. This demon was responsible for the unprecedented commodity speculation and industrial collusion rackets that quadrupled energy costs. This demon was responsible for the collapse of the rule of law, the erosion of environmental standards, the deaths of one million Iraqis, displacement of four million Iraqis, and severe trauma of the remaining 24 million, including toxic poisoning by depleted uranium, etc. Darth Viper had plenty of supporters but he was most certainly their gallant leader. Today the world imagines for perhaps the first time in US history the invasion and occupation of North America by world forces to achieve real justice with the roundup and imprisonment of Darth Viper and his several thousand enablers including virtually every member of the US Congress over the past eight years on war crimes charges. I look forward to personally contributing everything I can to securing the imprisonment of each and every one of them, and purging their evil influence out of the public institutions in North America.
I'm really disappointed with the way America has been run, in fact I'm disgusted. I can't believe some of us actually voted for these men to be in power. I certainly did not. The American government is a black spot in this world and should be completely erradicated, just as they say that the Big Three should consider restructuring so should our government. Get rid of these corrupt bastards and hang them all. I'm embarrassed to call myself an American right now, maybe before I die I'll be happy to be a part of this country.
'"This was a bad actor and the country's better off, the world's better off, with Saddam gone, and I think we made the right decision in spite of the fact that the original [intelligence] was off in some of its major judgments," Cheney said.
In a just world, this would read:
"This was a bad actor and the country's better off, the world's better off, with Cheney gone".
". . . the country's better off, the world's better off . . . and I think we made the right decision . . ."
More than $500 million a DAY spent on the phony "war on terror" ($200 billion/year). Plus veterans benefits and interest on the national debt, on top of that. (The new 35W Interstate bridge in Minneapolis cost $234 million. Can you imagine how much $500 million/day would buy in roads, bridges, mass transit, schools, housing, etc.?)
http://www.warresisters.org/pages/piechart.htm
Not to mention the dead, disabled, tortured, raped, robbed and displaced. Thanks, Dick, for destroying our prestige, reputation, alliances, security, and now our economy.
Justice will only be served when Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld and Rice are all in prison! But, Obama isn't going to put them there. (And, Obama pledges to INCREASE the military budget!)
And, if Obama does not put them there, he is complicit.
-- EKATON --
How much time is Obama allowed before he becomes an accessory to this crime?
Until 21 January, and I'm letting him off easy because he is already complicit, having continuously voted to approve further funding for the illegal invasion, occupation, and torturing of Iraqi civilians. I'm willing to grant him immunity if he does the right thing.
-- EKATON --