Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
40,000 Rally, More Than 100,000 Sign Petitions, to Say 'Recall Walker'
As tens of thousands of Wisconsinites rallied in Madison for a mass signing of petitions to recall anti-labor Governor Scott Walker Saturday, it was announced that the drive had collected 105,000 signatures in its first four days.
By the end of the weekend, that number will go substantially higher, say organizers of Saturday’s rally, which marshalls estimated drew 40,000. (Early in the day, as the crowd was building, Capitol Police confirmed that roughly 30,000 were present and the numbers grew as units of firefighters, teachers and state, county and municipal employees poured into the Capitol Square from the edges of Madison’s downtown.)
Protestors at the recall Walker rally at the State Capitol, Madison, Wisconsin Nov. 19, 2011. (Photo/Andy Manis) When the rally was done, activists with United Wisconsin, the group that is coordinating the recall drive, displayed tall piles of newly signed petitions. “After they’ve counted all the new petitions that have been gathered in Madison and across the state,” said former Wisconsin Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager, “they’ll be well on their way to 200,000.”
The labor, farm and community activists who organized the effort have sixty days to collect 540,000 signatures—25 percent of the electorate in the last gubernatorial election—to force the governor and Lieutenant Governor Rebecca Kleefisch to face the voters in a recall election. Organizers hope to turn in more than 700,000 signatures, in order to thwart challenges that will be posed by a multimillion-dollar effort paid for by the billionaire Koch brothers and other anti-labor zealots from across the country who have financed Walker’s campaigns.
The governor and his allies have not missed any openings to try to block the recall. The Koch brothers are already paying for pro-Walker television ads put together by their Americans for Prosperity group, and the governor’s campaign is spending heavily on its own ads—$300,000 since last Monday. (There are estimates that spending on Walker’s behalf will exceed $50 million.) Republican legislators have moved to give the governor veto power over election rules. And the Republican Party of Wisconsin has organized a campaign to intimidate recall petitioners with a website that urges party minions to “monitor” and challenge nurses, teachers and small-business owners who seek signatures. In some cases, Walker backers have grabbed petitions and ripped them up.
But there was no evidence Saturday or Sunday that any of the governor’s attempt’s to protect his political career were working.
It was not just that thousands were signing recall petitions on the Capitol Square in Madison.
They were doing it in all seventy-two Wisconsin counties.
The movement to recall Governor Scott Walker and Lieutenant Governor Rebecca Kleefisch is just that: a movement. It extends across the state, to every county, to every city, village and town.
As the November 15 starting date when the movement would begin gathering petitions to recall Walker and Kleefisch approached, training sessions for petition circulators were being held in the most Republican counties of the state. More than thirty offices opened and were staffed by volunteers in communities such as Elkhorn in traditionally conservative Walworth County, where a “midnight madness” party was held last Tuesday so that petitions could be signed the minute it was possible to do so.
In the rural Lafayette County community of Darlington, local recall coordinator Kate Bausch said folks had been gearing up to recall Walker since last February, when Walker proposed to strip state, county and municipal employees and teachers of their collective bargaining rights.
The political process is sick with spin and deception. But the biggest lie of the past year has been the suggestion, peddled primarily by Walker but also by the most disingenuous of his supporters, that anger with the governor has been confined to the liberal precincts of Madison or the Democratic neighborhoods of Milwaukee.
The truth is that with his assault on collective bargaining rights, the civil service system, local democracy, school funding and public services, Walker battered every town, village, city and county in Wisconsin. And with ethical scandals that are now swirling around him—following the September FBI raid on the home of his top political appointee and the revelation that his press secretary and one of his top fund raisers had requested immunity in a “John Doe” probe of political corruption—Walker has earned the scorn even of those Wisconsinites who will never think of themselves as liberals or Democrats.
The movement to displace Walker and Kleefisch, who had served as a willing rubber-stamp for the governor, is big. The grassroots energy across the state, the size of the crowd at Saturday’s rally, the number of signatures already collected: all of these confirm the historic scope and reach of the recall drive.
The movement to displace Walker and Kleefisch is broad-based. Trainings have taken place in every corner of the state. There are local committees, groups and activist circles in all of Wisconsin’s seventy-two counties. The recall movement takes in Democrats, Greens, Libertarians, independents and, yes, Republicans. That’s because Wisconsin’s instinct for fairness is stronger than the penchant for partisanship, as state Senator Dale Schultz, R-Richland Center, confirmed when he refused to go along with efforts by Walker’s legislative stooges to rig the recall process.
The response of Walker and Kleefisch partisans to Schultz’s show of independence was bitter and destructive. Schultz’s office in the Capitol was egged in an act of vandalism that—had it been directed at a Walker ally—would have brought cries of complaint from conservative talk-radio hosts and the Koch brothers–funded Tea Party project. But the recall movement in not prone toward that sort of whining.
Rooted as it is in the values and ideals of Wisconsin, the recall movement is genuine and determined. It has put pettiness aside and focused on the work at hand: removing a governor who has harmed the state economically, ethically and morally—and a lieutenant governor who has rejected her oath to defend the constitution and the best interests of Wisconsin.
From Kenosha in the southeast to Superior in the northwest, from the inner-city wards of Milwaukee to the crossroads towns of Marathon County, Wisconsinites are rising to the call of democracy and honest governance. They are signing petitions, circulating petitions, filing petitions and defending petitions against bogus challenges from lawyers who are paid for by the out-of-state billionaires who are funding the Walker-Kleefisch campaign. And when the petitioning is done, when the recall election is scheduled, they will mount the greatest grassroots campaign Wisconsin has seen in a century—not just to remove Walker and Kleefisch but to renew the democratic ideals of a great state that has been temporarily misled.


38 Comments so far
Show AllSo,
When the angry Wisconsinites get rid of the corporate slime of Walker and Kleefisch,
I can't help but wonder which new corporate slime they will install in their places.
The hairpiece Nichols will help keep the voters from straying outside of corporate control.
I just read Nichol's book *The 'S' Word* and there Nichols explicitly argues that both major parties have been colonized by corporate power. The book recalls previous times in our history when genuine socialist movements coalesced to stand up for the interests of the worker against the exploitation of capital. The book brings to light the struggles of the left to both influence the levers of political power without being co-opted by the Democrats. In short, he makes a clear case for the need for a true left political movement (broadly construed as socialism) to counter a corporate-dominated Democratic party. Both Clinton and Obama come in for criticism in this respect. So I just don't see how Birdbrain Alley thinks Nichols is a shill for corporations ... please enlighten.
I've never read any of Nichols' books ... just his columns here on CD. And I have to agree with BbA. Nichols and his boss Katrina Vandem Shill are both huge democrat party apologists, consistantly portraying the dems as well meaning but occasionally wayward and bumbling defenders of middle class interests, who at their worst are still only the lesser of two evils.
.
Its kind of ironic to me that Nichols would talk about the need for OWS or any other left wing movement to remain independent of the Blue team when he is an instrument of the co-optating process.
I've read Nichol's book but haven't read much of his stuff for the Nation (or anything else in the Nation for that matter) so I find this divergence of interpretation interesting. A clear theme of the book is that independent socialist and left-leaning movements are necessary. Nichols may engage in that "lesser-of-two-evils" Democratic party apologetics but the book shows he has a depth of understanding of socialism in the US. If he really does engage in blind shilling for the Dems, book-Nichols should find Nation-Nichols problematic.
"alonzo zilch"
Nichols has written many articles in the past year wherein he has focussed on the evil republicans in Wisconsin and in Ohio, repeatedly. The agenda of those republicans is the same as what is promoted by many democrats, but Nichols will not say a peep about the corrupt democrats, such as the democrat governor of Illinois and the democrat controlled general assembly and senate in Illinois.
If you want to think that Nichols doesn't know about their corrupt maneuvers, you are much more trusting than am I.
I do not think he is stupid, just very, very deceptive and deliberately misleading.
I suspect, based upon years of reading his deviousness presented in "The Nation", that the book you refer to probably is meant to get people to work harder within the democrat's establishment for "change."
I will tell you I have no intention of purchasing anything written by the hairpiece.
The evidence that Nichols is a shill for the Democratic Party is article after article Nichols wrote for The Nation and Common Dreams posted on this site. I haven't read Nichol's book but if he understands both parties have been "colonized by corporate power" (which is only part of the problem) then he is worse than someone who doesn't understand the problems and shills for either party. If the book just generalizes that corporate power is the main problem, it falls far short of explaining the problems of the two parties as they act against the interest of the American people on more issues than just those related to corporate power. For example, I'd be curious of Nichols addressed in his book the influence of the Jewish lobby (e.g, AIPAC) on Congress. If he didn't, then his emphasis on just corporations, although probably accurate, is a deflection.
I agree!! Nichols is a Dem apologist.
Go Wisconsin, we are fortunate to have journalists like John Nichols.
Journalist? No .... maybe you meant blue party apologist and spin doctor?
No.
Sorry, yes.
No.
A resounding Yes. Both Nichols and The Nation are shills. Dennis Kucinich may not have been the best candidate the Democrats ever had for President. But he was far and away the best in 2004. And both Nichols and The Nation worked tirelessly to either denigrate him or keep any coverage of him on the backburner.
No.
John? Is that you John Nichols?
No.
Walker will come through this just fine.
After the recall ballots are counted and a decision arrived at, Kathy Nickolaus will discover a hidden box containing the exact number of votes needed to keep him safely ensconced in his position as footstool to the Kochs.
I hate to sound like a cynical sceptic, but despite the great work of all these Wisonsinites to recall Walker, they are still working within the corrupt system. It aint' gonna work. Even if they DO recall Walker - doubtful, considering that the Rethugs are notorious for corrupting vote counts, etc. - another Corporate whore will take his place, most likely of the "D" wing of the Corporate party. Until and unless people realize that when you work within the confines of the corrupted system, any results will thus be corrupted themselves, there will never be any forward momentum. Change must come from OUTSIDE the corrupt system.
Sure sounds good. But how do you make that happen? And where in the U.S. do we have actual examples of that happening? I'm excited about OWS, but so far I haven't seen any effect on business as usual in D.C. The Repubs just succeeded in shutting down all deficit-reduction negotiations by demanding (demanding!!) that the Bush tax cuts be made permanent (permanent!!). Thank your neighborhood Tea Party voter for further breaking a broken government.
That's because the OWS hasn't challenged the power of the elites directly. Violent or non-violent it's got to make a dent in the bottom line. Don't forget that 2nd amendment. It wasn't put in there just so whites could go around shooting varmints and blacks. It recognizes that bad government sometimes needs to be thrown out by force of arms. Why not put together a foreclosure rescue unit that creates a standoff with police for families about to be evicted because they're too poor to pay the mortgage. Some violence would likely ensue but it would also generate a bit of media coverage and the elites would have to formulate a response. ..... an example anyway...
I wonder where the comments go. This morning "Visiting Professor" posted a comment criticizing John Nicols, and I responded to it. But neither is here now. Is there another "layer" of comments that only a select few get to see?
I don't see the comments you reference, sheepherder.
You might as well ask, "I wonder where the yellow went?"
With all due respect, you must not be Amerikan if you fail to appreciate the importance of comments threads maintaining a fresh, minty scent.
Sorry to hear that, corvo. There was a late night/early morning troll attack on Abby's 1st Davis video thread. And I just noticed that my computer's history of my interactions with CD just today is missing many items I visited. So, perhaps you were an unintended casualty. I see your new user name provides info about your previous. Are you a descendent of Rolfe's?
I occasionaly comment at Glenn Greenwald's Salon space, and comments there seem to run the gamut. I was once a moderator of a comment thread and was quite happy when my term in that capacity ended, but I only recall purging one user for repeatedly ignoring the warnings it got from me and other mods.
I am shocked, absolutely shocked that orgastic behavior is occurring right here on CD. Oh the profanity of it all! Have we sunk so low since God shed his grace on America. Is God's sheding grace anything like my sheding dandruff?
Gee, I've called-out Juan Cole on this site and have yet to be purged. Perhaps moderation after-the-fact is a poor policy? Most members here are solidly Anti-Obama, so I wonder what will happen next year as us members become more vindictively vociferous as next November approaches.
You have to be logged in to see all the comments. If you aren't logged in, you will only see a few.
I know that. So I click on the "logon" link, get a page saying you are not authorized to view this page, hit the commondreams.org address on my browser, and (usually) end up with all of the comments. This morning it worked, but when I did it again this afternoon, it did not. Curious.
Wierd. Or maybe CD is just deleting comments they don't like. No idea....
Citizens of Wisconsin should be permitted to vote against Scott Walker
just as much as they were/are permitted to vote for him. A voter ought not
be obliged to vote FOR one politician as his/her only means of voting
AGAINST another politician. The voter might not favor either politician.
A cynic may say: Just stay home and don't vote if you don't favor any of
the candidates. If I did that I'd let myself be deprived of the right to vote.
The approximately 0.01%, who are the political schemers, may make sure
that all of the candidates are scoundrels so that only a few people actually
vote, and the oligarchy is sure to get their man in office.
If the only remedy for such scheming is to recall an office holder after
he/she has been in office a while, then the people should use whatever
means are available to them.
The general principle that "begs" to be considered in the present context
is permission for the people to vote NO. By rights, the Capitol buillding in
Wisconsin and the governor's office belong to the citizens of Wisconsin.
If the citizens strongly disapprove of the present governor's behavior in
office, they should put him out of office.
It is great to get a 'recall' vote petition drive going but it will take much much more than just getting the signatures in Wisconsin IF anyone remembers the debacle of that state's supreme court election that was so dubiously mishandled by a member of the same party hiding votes on her computer and miraculously finding them in time to give the creep who ostensibly won that election of the coveted seat on that states supreme court. There really needs to be some organized observers rotating in and out of the precincts to check and note any irregularities in the process at the polls and each party's headquarters to prevent a replay of what happened last time.
I hope I never become so politicaly pure that I can not appreciate the superb efforts of John Nicols. It seems to bother some people that, whether they can stomach it or not, a game is being played with our lives on many levels, and just because they have become aware of levels that normaly escape scrutiny, they assume nothing matters on any other level. What would be wrong with playing things out within the normal traditions of the political game, hell isn't that one of our big beefs with the Democrats, that they refuse to go through the motions of fighting if the votes arn't there? All of it matters.
I am sick of reding holier than thou crap, from people who are more idealogicaly pure than whatever author.
"appreciate the superb efforts of John Nichols" What superb efforts? The two party system is corrupt and Nichols shills for one of the two corrupt parties (Democrats).
I've heard your politically pure argument before from Demobots. It is a red-herring argument as progressives are willing to support third parties or third party or independent candidates that aren't politically perfect. The Green Party is far from perfect but in contrast to the Democrats and Republicans, the Green Party offers more than rhetorical differences. The politically pure argument, just as the Republicans are worse argument, is used by Demobots because they can't actually defend the Democrat's policies that are the same as the Republicans, ie., expansion of the world "war on terror", Bush/Obama tax cuts, putting Israel ahead of America as Obama was silent as Israel executed an American flotilla member with 6 gunshots at point blank range, a healthcare bill that as Kucinich said before voting for it, is a sellout to corporations, supporting Israel's ethnic cleansing of Palestinians... Again, as the Democrats can't defend their own policies, they resort to scare-mongering ("Repubs are worse") and blaming the voter (they are "f*cking retards" "whiners", caused Gore to lose the election, are too politically pure...).
Good comments, Progressive101. I'm glad you and others mention Kucinich who'd often been marginalized and subtly - sometimes not so subtly - denigrated by the corporate media. People like him crop up here and there throughout this country's history, and often fade away under the streamrolling corporate-backed system (the destiny of those who cannot defend their ideals in the face of an overpowering, hostile system).
As I see it, OWS is - consciously or not - preparing the socio-political-intellectual background for true, solid revolutionaries to emerge. This time, perhaps, there will be a massive convergence of socialist-minded individuals, backed by the still largely dormant 99 percent. When that happens this country, under whatever name it decides to call itself, will be a true beacon to the world.
All I can say is you go Wisconsin, kick those sorry lying bastards out of office. And if the next one is no better, kick their ass out to. I am thrilled to see 10's of thousands of people standing up and fighting against the Koch brothers and anyone else who is selling us down the river. The system is irrevocably broken, we must change the system, even if It's one state at a time.
good for the people of Wisconsin...I applaud their effort and with any luck Walker will soon be history!