Beyond the Bailout: Agenda for a New Economy
The financial crisis has put to rest the myths that our economic institutions are sound and markets work best when deregulated. Our economic institutions have failed, not only financially, but also socially and environmentally. This, combined with the election of a new president with a mandate for change, creates an opportune moment to rethink and redesign.
President-elect Obama has promised to grow the economy from the bottom up. That would be a substantial improvement over growing the top at the expense of the bottom. The real need, however, is a bottom-up transformation of our economic values and institutions to align with the imperatives and opportunities of the 21st century. It involves a five part agenda: clean up Wall Street, play by market rules, self-finance the real economy, measure what we really want, and convert to debt-free money.The recent market meltdown and the resulting bailout commitments of more than a trillion dollars have focused the nation’s attention on the devastating consequences of Wall Street deregulation. This is but the tip of the iceberg of a failed economy in serious need of basic redesign.
Our economy is wildly out of balance with human needs and the natural environment. The result is disaster for both. Wages are falling in the face of soaring food and energy prices. Consumer debt and housing foreclosures are setting historic records. The middle class is shrinking. The unconscionable and growing worldwide gap between rich and poor with its related social alienation is producing social collapse, which in turn produces crime, terrorism, and genocide.
At the same time, excessive consumption is pushing Earth’s ecosystem into collapse. Scientists are in almost universal agreement that human activity bears substantial responsibility for climate change and the related increase in droughts, floods, and wildfires.
We face a monumental economic challenge that goes far beyond anything being discussed in the U.S. Congress. The hardships imposed by temporarily frozen credit markets pale by comparison.
This would be a good time to start evaluating economic performance against indicators of what we really want—healthy children, families, communities, and natural systems.
The Wall Street bailout package that Congress passed in its moment of panic did nothing to address the structural cause of the credit freeze, let alone the structural cause of the economy’s even more serious environmental and social failures. On the positive side, the financial crisis has put to rest the myths that our economic institutions are sound and that markets work best when deregulated. It creates an opportune moment for deep change.
Here are some essential steps toward a system redesign that can put us on the path to a just and sustainable economy that works for all.
1. CLEAN UP WALL STREET
The first item of business is to get the immediate crisis under control. Wall Street institutions have long claimed their trading activities create wealth, provide the funds that keep business moving, increase economic efficiency, and stabilize markets. The financial meltdown pulled away the curtain to reveal a corrupt system that runs on speculation, the stripping of corporate assets, predatory lending, and asset bubbles like the real estate and dot-com “booms.”
If the people involved produce anything of value, it is purely incidental to their primary quest for speculative gains, which placed the entire global economy at risk and led to extortionate demands for taxpayer bailouts when their bets went bad. For these labors, the 50 highest-paid private investment fund managers in 2007 averaged $588 million in compensation—19,000 times as much as average worker pay.
We must hold Wall Street accountable, recover some of our losses from those responsible, and preclude a repetition of the credit collapse. The recommendations of the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), a Washington, D.C., think tank, are a good place to start. In “A Sensible Plan for Recovery,” IPS calls on Congress to make Wall Street pay for both the bailout and a true economic stimulus package. The plan recommends a securities transactions tax, a minimum corporate income tax, recovery of bonuses paid to Wall Street CEOs responsible for the crisis, an end to corporate tax havens, and an end to tax loopholes for CEO pay. IPS also calls for extensive federal regulation to limit speculation and assert real oversight over financial markets.
Implementing these recommendations will be an excellent start on limiting speculation, restoring a progressive tax system to achieve a more equitable distribution of economic power, and putting the more predatory Wall Street firms out of business.
Additional steps will be needed to break up concentrations of corporate power, beginning with Wall Street, and to hold the remaining banks accountable to the public interest. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s decision to buy a government equity stake in troubled banks is a positive step that may open the way to a deeper restructuring of the financial system.
The federal government should immediately reinstate the provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act prohibiting the merger of commercial and investment banks, and force the breakup of financial conglomerates and any other Wall Street institutions that are too big to fail. As Senator Bernie Sanders has observed, “If a company is too big to fail, it is too big to exist.”
2. PLAY BY MARKET RULES
Once we extinguish the immediate fire, we can turn our attention to redesigning the potentially beneficial institutions of finance to align with the imperatives of sustainability and equity. Ironically, given the excesses committed by Wall Street in the name of market freedom, the economy we need to create looks remarkably like the market economy vision of Adam Smith, revered by many as the father of capitalism.
Smith envisioned a world of local market economies populated by small entrepreneurs, artisans, and family farmers with strong community roots engaged in producing and exchanging goods and services to meet the needs of themselves and their neighbors. His vision bears little resemblance to the Wall Street economy of footloose global capital, credit default swaps, reckless speculation, and global corporate empires.
As I elaborated in When Corporations Rule the World and The Post-Corporate World: Life After Capitalism, socially efficient market allocation depends on a number of important conditions that Wall Street and those economists devoted to the ideology of neoliberal market fundamentalism routinely ignore. These include:
- Market prices must internalize full social and environmental costs.
- Trade between nations must be in balance.
- Investment must be local.
- No player can be big enough to directly influence market price.
- Economic power must be equitably distributed.
- Every player must have complete information and there can be no trade secrets (read: no government-enforced intellectual property rights).
To avoid the distortion of unfair competitive practices, markets must be regulated to assure that these essential conditions are maintained. Think of them as basic principles for securing the healthy, just, and sustainable function of Main Street economies.
3. SELF-FINANCE THE REAL ECONOMY
Far from serving the financial needs of Main Street, Wall Street treats Main Street like a colony to be managed for the benefit of its colonial master. In alliance with the Federal Reserve, Wall Street players have used a combination of control over the money supply, predatory lending practices, and lobbying and campaign contributions to suppress wages, dismantle social safety nets, and capture the value of productivity gains for themselves. The top 1 percent of U.S. income earners increased their share of national cash income from 9 percent to 19 percent between 1980 and 2005, according to Charles R. Morris in The Trillion Dollar Meltdown. Income for 90 percent of households fell relative to inflation, household savings rates dropped to less than 1 percent, and household debt soared as Main Street workers struggled to hold their lives together.
Creating a fair distribution of wealth by restoring progressive tax rates, increasing the minimum wage, containing health care costs, and regulating mortgage and credit card interest rates is an essential element of a post-bailout economic agenda. This will help those at the bottom, restore household savings and purchasing power, and, combined with the debt-free money system proposed below, eliminate Main Street dependence on Wall Street financing. The financial services needs of Main Street economies are best served by a federally regulated network of independent, locally owned community banks that fulfill the classic textbook banking function of acting as intermediaries between local people looking for a secure place for their savings and local people who need loans to buy a home or finance a business. Evidence that people with savings are moving their accounts from the giant banks with questionable balance sheets to smaller local banks is a positive step.
Wall Street interests have also rigged the economic game to give a competitive advantage to mega-corporations over the local independent businesses that are the heart and soul of Main Street economies. The New Rules Project of the Institute for Local Self Reliance provides a wealth of recommendations for restoring a proper balance in favor of Main Street that also merits serious consideration.
4. MEASURE WHAT WE REALLY WANT
The only legitimate function of an economic system is to serve life. At present, however, we assess economic performance solely against financial indicators—gross domestic product (GDP) and stock prices—while disregarding social and environmental consequences. We are now paying the price for years of managing the economy for financial performance, which translates into making money for people who have money—that is, making rich people richer. It was not a wise choice. We now bear the devastating costs of this foolishness in the form of massive social and environmental damage and financial instability.
This would be a good time to start evaluating economic performance against indicators of what we really want—healthy children, families, communities, and natural systems. This would place life values ahead of money values and dramatically reframe the public policy side of our economic decision-making. Happiness, by the way, is an important indicator of physical and psychological health.
We might well continue to track GDP, a measure of economic throughput, as a quite useful indicator of the economic cost of producing a given level of health and well-being. When we recognize that GDP represents cost, not gain, it becomes clear why making it grow is a mistake. A number of researchers have been pointing out that happiness, as well as other indicators of human, social, and environmental health, have been declining even as GDP increased, but their appeals have been largely ignored. We continue to manage our economies to maximize the cost, rather than the benefit, of economic activity. The shock of financial collapse creates an opportunity to draw attention to this substantial anomaly. We will know we have turned an important corner when business news reporters happily announce, “It has been a successful quarter. Happiness rose by two points and GDP is down by one point.”
5. CONVERT TO DEBT-FREE MONEY
This brings us to the most important reform of all: changing the way we create money. One key to Wall Street’s power and to the inherent instability of the financial system is the current practice of private banks creating money with a simple bookkeeping entry each time they make a loan. Because the bookkeeping entry creates only the principal, but not the interest, unless the economy grows fast enough to generate sufficient demand for loans to create the new money required to make the interest payments on the previous loans, debts go into default and the financial system and the economy collapse. The demand for repayment with interest of nearly every dollar in circulation virtually assures the economy will fail unless GDP and inequality are constantly growing.
Leading economists and political figures, including Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin, have advocated replacing the system of bank-created debt-money with an alternative system in which the government creates debt-free money by spending it into existence to fund public goods like infrastructure or education. The suggestion that government create money with the stroke of a pen sets off all sorts of alarm bells about runaway inflation. The primary change, however, would simply be that the entry is made by government for a public good rather than by a private bank for private profit. Ellen Hodgson Brown’s The Web of Debt is an informative current review of issues and options.
Privately issued debt-money adds to debt and taxes and bears major responsibility for environmental destruction because it requires infinite growth, extreme inequality because it assures an upward flow of wealth from Main Street to Wall Street, and economic instability because issuing loans to fuel reckless speculation generates handsome short-term bank profits. Publicly issued debt-free money would greatly reduce debt, taxes, and environmental harm, be more equitable, and increase financial stability. In a democracy, it should be ours to choose.
This is an opportune moment to move forward an agenda to replace the failed money-serving institutions of our present economy with the institutions of a new economy dedicated to serving life. The idea that we humans might put life ahead of money may seem unrealistic and contrary to our human nature. Surely, that is what our prevailing cultural story would have us believe. That story, however, has no more validity than the story that Wall Street speculation serves a higher public purpose. As I noted in my article We are Hard-Wired to Care and Connect in the Fall 2008 issue of YES!, scientists have found that the human brain is hard-wired for compassion and connection.
My many years living abroad in Africa, Latin America, and Asia taught me that people of every race, religion, and nationality the world over share a dream of a world of happy, healthy children, families, and communities living in vibrant, healthy, natural environments. When they see an opportunity, people are willing to make extraordinary investments of their life energy in an effort to actualize this dream, as regularly documented in the pages of YES! Liberated from the predatory grip of Wall Street, this long-suppressed energy has the potential to transform our relationships with one another and Earth, and to realize our shared dream of a world that works for all.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
45 Comments so far
Show AllThere is but one question.
Which came first the Chicken or the Egg?
Which comes first Consciousness or Reality?
Is What you conceive what you believe?
Unfortunately, at this time, most of Western World is unconscious, it seems.
Perhaps it would be a fine thing to wake up from the "Common Dreams" to create a new reality.
What say you?
Ok , lets get a couple of things straight.
Gas has cost us form 1.29 / gal 2001 through 4.35 a gal 2008.
They said it was due to high demand, globally.
Speculators as late as June were buying at 130 a barrel.
Our economy collapses, their is a huge bail out , as oil prices plummet because Americans are no longer working and consuming gas.
All this in two months.
But, what happened to the 130/barrel oil , that never made it to the pumps. We never burned it.Or had to pay for it.
Who did we bail out???? The guys that have been gauging us at the pumps? The speculators???
What happened to the huge global demand for oil driving up the prices, surely our lack of consumption which just recently dropped did not affect the rest of the worlds demand.
So , are you seeing what I am seeing, the bailout was for the speculators who cant sell the gas at the price they bought it at 4 months ago.
My fellow Americans, we have been rode hard, stolen blind , and put in the barn wet and broke.
Wow, some one give me a smoke , I feel drained.
BornFreeMen
I would like a personal bailout for having had to spend an extra 12000 over the last 7 years for gas, and 7000 grand for the rise in prices of food due to transportation costs, and for good measure an extra 1000 for interest.
"Ok , lets get a couple of things straight."
The first thing we should get straight is that there are no proposals right now to "bail out" the oil industry. There's a measure already passed regarding certain financial companys and a proposal concerning the auto industry. The oil companys are making "record profits" and aren't asking for loans.
Regarding speculators, people forget that it goes both ways, the current rapid decline in prices is due in part to speculation.
David C. Korten is actually an anarchist rather than a leftist. I'm surprised that none of these astute and intelligent posters have pointed that out. His thinking is more closely aligned with Peter Kropotkin than FDR. I thought his book "The Post-Corporate World: Life After Capitalism" was fabulous, and especially the 24 hour time-frame chapter on evolution.
This is a great article. There was only one comment that I would like to change a bit. Korten says we must "contain health care costs" without saying the only way this can be done is with a single payer system that takes the for profit insurance companies out of the system.
I really like the concept of 'debt free money'. That is what Roosevelt used in the New Deal to get us working on programs needed in our nation. That is what we need now. Federal funding for a new W.P.A. to create a new energy system to get us off the oil.
This article is more fever dreams from a sick society.
Share the power.
FREE AMERICA
REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY
Korten's thoughts and the idea of Revolutionary Democracy are not mutually exclusive. Korten outlines ways to change the flow of power from top-down to bottom-top, ie, from the People. I already have a fever...what I want are dreams!
The major problems with the economy are the loss of good-paying jobs and the skewed distribution of wealth.
In prior economic downturns, we still had a large segment of our population who had manufacturing jobs that paid well. This served as a basis for rebuilding the economy. These are gone. The financial services industry, on the other hand, consists of a small group of wealthy individuals. Bailing them out cannot restore the economy.
Most of our economy (70% of it) depends on consumers. We no longer have the money to consume. So much wealth has "trickled up" that only the wealthy can spend.
Check:
http://www.inequality.org/
Click on "By the Numbers" and move down to the pie charts.
Also, look at the Economic Policy Institue site. It has more recent information.
http://www.epi.org/
In 2004, the wealth in this country was: 1% had 34.3%, the next 9% had 36.9%, the next 10% had 13.4%. The poorest 80% had only 15.3% of the wealth. Unfortunately, Bush's tax cuts targeted the wealthiest.
Unless many of the poorest 80% can once again have jobs that pay well, we cannot rebuild the economy. A "stimulus package" can only help a little bit for a short time. We need a long-term solution. Don't hold your breath.
Over speculation of the real estate market and credit cards created the financial mess.
Credit cards should be a flat 3% interest rate-without usury costs etc.
Housing will have to drop to affordable levels.
The middle class of the usa cannot afford to be exploited to help the global economy.
I think the crash is a myth. There is just no way the credit card companies can be making all of this money and not profit from it.
American people should be able to cancel debts or take the insitutions to court responsible for imposing high usury costs upon them.
People cannot and will not support the rich with the usury rates. Most will quit working even if they are.
Often people will say others should not have children who cannot afford them. Yet most people are supporting children-the rich and corporations of the world.
George C. Brown - With regard to the "bailout" and the crooks that are cooking up this toxic brew, it's about time that CD reprint the Vol.10, No. 11 "Hightower Lowdown" for November 2008 for a full appreciation of what has been thrust upon us by the financial Powers That Be and the monstrous task that lies before us to bring about recovery.
It's refreshing to read an article that gives ideas on how we might develop a more sustainable economy. Too many articles (and reader comments!) here in C-D seem so depressingly hopeless. OK, so maybe this author doesn't have every little detail worked out, but it's a start. Somebody's gotta start somewhere.
Some of the comments I've read following various articles on C-D make me want to reach for the cyanide capsules. I just don't believe that we're all going to have to live in caves and eat bugs because the economy will hit some kind of a brick wall, like the speed of light--something that you just can't get past. If we could figure out how to do just one thing--if somehow we could wave a magic wand, causing government to totally work for all citizens by providing the basic infrastructure for community (from sidewalks to national defense), that alone might provide a good standard-of-living for everyone. In contrast to the current system where the top business activity in the U.S. is buying politicians so that the force of government can be used to expedite the process of the Have-it-alls ripping off the Have-nots.
As for the reader who insisted that another reader get rid of his SUV and gluttonous lifestyle, well, I don't know how to respond to that. What I have in mind is this: A place to live, with heat and indoor plumbing, some electricity and an Internet connection for this 10-year-old Dell, basic groceries, gasoline for my over 100,000-mile-old Ford (not an SUV) to get me to my job 4 miles away, and my prescription meds. No Disney World vacations, giant screen TV's, no cable TV service (can't afford it), no outings to concerts or floating casinos. Is this an excessive lifestyle?
I truly believe that a sustainable economy and a decent standard-of-living is possible for everyone. There is no "physical" restriction. But there is a human impediment. It's up to those of us who give a damn to go around those who profit from other people's misery.
This is why bipartisanship is important. If Obama's mandate isn't enough for you, then combine it with McCain's supporters, and you actually the whole United States offering a mandate for change.
A 98.7% mandate to be exact.
Just today Obama and McCain offered this joint statement:
"We hope to work together... on critical challenges like solving our financial crisis, creating a new energy economy, and protecting our nation's security."
Barack Obama and John McCain
BUST MONOPOLIES or nationalize them.
"election of a new president with a mandate for change"
How is a mandate for change built when the electorate voted for business as usual? There is no mandate for change. There is only fantasies for change. No mandates! Vote for business as usual and that's what you get! AIPAC thanks you for your generosity!
"The financial crisis has put to rest the myths that our economic institutions are sound"
Oh really? Tens of millions of Americans voted for business as usual, i.e. establishment chimps such as O'Bama, McKane, Pelosi, et al, to carry out familiar policies. Ehh? Who voted for change? WHO?
The chimp votes tell us the capitalist, militarist, zionist myths are VERY MUCH alive and well, ehh? What else shall we make of those votes? America spoke: We want more business as usual, PLEASE! Bring it on!!
That reminds me.
President Bush was asked in a recent CNN interview if he had any regrets. Despite an eight years' accumulation of disasters to chose from, he came up mainly with just his frequent outbursts of high school level bravado. Apparently, only juvenile utterances like the bombastic "Bring it on!" or the massively wrong "Mission Accomplished" are deserving of regret.
Astonishing. Is he hoping in his last months in office that he will be referred to merely as a Lame Dork President?
"no government-enforced intellectual property rights"-This seems like a very bad idea. Important research would come to a screaching halt. Certainly some of the patenting and copyrighting that is currently allowed, either should not have been, or the exclusivity should be shrunken.
Greg: in 1983 i purchased for $50 from IBM the complete details of how the AT (a pc with a 10meg hard drive) worked..including the disk drive, the monitor (which i still use) the printer, and all the interface cards..also the original bios (the code to make the whole thing play)..this created the pc industry..apple chose to close their system..look at their market share..when i got into electronics in the 60's there were no secrets..silicon valley folks shared ideas at local bars..progress boomed..we are trying to get back to this through open source..if you look around you will find that all the major programs that one used to have to buy are now free and have goodies which the sold versions don't have..these are written and supported by open source societies..intellectual property is a very bad idea..it kills innovation..i watched it rear its ugly head..slay it.
ken
Point #5, a new currency, is the ringer. The first 4 will take care of themselves when the 5th is implemented. The last President that tried to tamper with the monetary system in a meaningful way was, well, shot.
Crossfire, The Plot That Killed Kennedy by Jim Marrs, 1989
Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the Constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal Reserve system, who print paper money then loan it to the government at interest.
He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order 11,110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. A number of "Kennedy bills" were indeed issued but were quickly withdrawn after Kennedy's death.
Considering that the battle over U.S. monetary control by a monolithic central bank is an issue that dates back to the founding of the Republic, some assassination researchers believe Kennedy's little-noted efforts to reform the money supply and curtail the Federal Reserve System may have cost him much more than just the enmity of the all-powerful international bankers.
http://theformofmoney.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2006/7/6/2088735.html
It is impossible for the market price to incorporate true social and environmental costs as this article suggests because the thermodynamic throughput comes in at below 1% efficiency. True prices following this advice would stand at about 100 times current market price, completely shutting down the economy. Victims are central to market practices, as they always have been, and the only potential recourse is to replace it with democratic decision making by the public.
Jim Eldon...Your point about eliminating usury is very important. Many people have had to put medical and other necessary expenses on credit cards. Now credit card companies are doubling - tripling interest rates, even on consumers who have paid on time. Some companies are even making the increased interest rates retroactive. Congress has signed away the rights of all of us.
In a nut shell, what David Korten is saying is that America needs a drastic change in values.
The institutional forces opposed to radical social change are enormous, but the most formidable oppositional force is the money mindset of American culture. Americans love capitalism. But the prevailing American culture of consumer capitalism has proven to be a disaster for humanity. American culture has gone against the evolutionary destiny of humankind, the inevitable human quest for a just, sustainable and compassionate world.
With the institutions of financial and industrial capitalism collapsing all around us, the opportunity is not a revolution of economic systems but a revolution of American values. This can only come from a revitalized democracy that demands radical social change. To me, success can only come from massive non-violent civil disobedience to jolt the American imagination.
A radical call for a change in American values is the most powerful winning message that civic activists can turn to. A national plea for a change in values is the most powerful message possible because it is a spiritual message and thus transformational. Such a massive democratic outcry has the power to move mountains.
Sioux Rose
Stephen: I salute and agree with your vision, and also believe Korten is one of the most "out of the box" visionary thinkers of our times. To remain positive when so much is coming apart is the gift of a lightworker!
Thank you Sioux Rose. I appreciated your comment.
I would like to add for the readers that David Korten goes far beyond his writing, with his lectures at the teach-ins of the International Forum on Globalization, his work with the World Social Forum, and the instrumental role he played in writing and launching the Earth Charter, which is probably the greatest document ever written by humankind.
You Sioux Rose and so few others seem to undertand that science and technology can take us no further as a species. It may very well destroy us. Until more numbers of people recognize the huge untapped powers of spirituality and higher consciousness, we will remain the Planet of the Apes. What gives me hope is that I see this happening in so many people I meet at the various conferences and civic actions I attend. I feed off their energies.
Lightworkers will not positively impact environmental degradation. Legislation might. Our Earth Mother is under assault and environmentalism is no longer a spectator sport. Those in the spirituality for sale movement are the least likely to bring change of an order of magnitude necessary. In fact, they are part of the problem since they capitulate to a system inimical to their own values and standards. Capitalism will always trump authentic transformation. Obama will sweep some crumbs off the table to appease his followers, but hardly a change agent expressed by those whose belief system is derived from false presuppositions.
Sioux Rose
CHRIS: I am not sure if I am being lumped in the "spirituality for sale" comment, but most of my work has been UNPAID. I realize that I am part of the fabric of all humanity and my efforts to raise consciousness will potentially improve matters for all *(or at least some). Inadvertently your comment shows a homage to Mammon since you ultimately seem to believe EVERYTHING is controlled by the all-mighty buck. There ARE higher factors at work & play, or as my beloved William S said, "More things in heaven and earth than dreamt of in YOUR philosophy." I do believe you want the same peaceful world that harmonizes with nature's intentions & seasons that Stephen and I aspire to help bring about.
Rose, it seems to me that everything we see, hear, smell, or touch is somehow mediated by technology. No one is pristine least of all me. I would love to see Korten's idealistic norms enacted. But i am not hopeful the political system is going to suddenly be transformed by a knowledge of "more things in heaven and Earth than dreamt of in [their] philosophy" by righting two hundred years of control by power elites who are running the global economic order. Here is where i part company with all the feel good types. I see Obama as a very bright guy who used powerful archetypal forces to mobilize people under a banner of their belief in change. Belief itself changes nothing. And given the fact that he is resurrecting all of the Clinton cronies of the past with checkered pasts, I am even less hopeful that authentic change will happen. I am not looking for perfection, but authenticity. There are many visionaries out there including Korten that would make extraordinary public servants in an Obama Administration, but I seriously doubt he is on Obama's short list for a Cabinet post. The political status quo pay back too steep a price to pay apparently.
Sioux Rose
CHRIS: Your comments are deep & thoughtful, and I am as discouraged as you are with respect to Obama's appointments. However, do not be so sure that belief (especially when it becomes a POTENT collective force) is incapable of moving mountains, or changing things around. And there ARE universal laws. True, it would seem they have been broken for some time without any apparent agency balancing the scales. The wheels of karma turn slowly relative to our mortal lifespans; but they ARE always turning.
I have met people (like the idiots who drive SUVS but think they care about global warming) such as those you mentioned in seminars oriented towards consciousness raising. Please don't toss all the sincere visionaries into the same pod as the wanabes. Just as the spectrum is composed of different hues of light, human beings are at various levels of spiritual evolution. Our world is a didactic organic mosaic, and often the lightworker PLANTS the vision that others in due time will follow. It is like a seed in that a time lapse occurs between its initial planting, and the evident fruit of that harvest.
i hope you are right, my friend, and will pray for such an outcome...i was not tossing Korten out, just pointing out to his supporters who voted for Obama that Korten's values and agenda (which i agree with) will not be enacted by the same corporate cronies of the Clinton years. They may pay lip service to those values for the sake of obfuscation to steer people away of what they actually do behind closed doors. The 700 billion is a case in point. That money was asserted as a bail out for bad mortgages, but instead went to the elites, not those people struggling to climb out of financial hole based on predatory lending practices. I have not heard that Obama will launch any criminal investigations in this matter.
Change begins from within, not by some proxy narrative. Try selling off your SUV and reign in your gluttonous spending habits. Change is not some marketing strategy bringing down the seminal word on the passive body of congregational discipleship. Once you learn that lesson, authentic transformation will begin and not until then. This Cat makes his living selling books published on paper taken from what use to be a pristine old growth forest which now stands as a tree farm for the logging industry. Wake up!
Actually coyote, change and the propagation of values goes both ways. If individuals promoting certain values can establish public institutions that embody them, then they will be self-propagating. Like the institutions of financial capitalism - these "innovative investment instruments" that were created by greedy reckless people, basically encouraged and spread greed and recklessness. Similarly, people who want to bring sanity, sustainability and ethics to our economic lives seek to create institutions that embody and therefore institutionalize those values.
Nice argument Jim, but please tell me where one such political institution exists and embodies an ethos of sustainability on the planet? Obama talks a lot about sustainability, but if one checks his record what you will find is inimical standards that violate his own rhetoric. Coal, nuclear, and bio fuels are not sustainable, nor even wise for a planet in peril. Scientific consensus exists on Bio showing it to be a contributing factor to climate change as egregious as fossil fuels. Moreover, as land transitions from food crops to higher paying crops to supply bio fuel plants, not only will food prices soar, but world wide starvation increase. Furthermore, Obama has embraced coal asserting the "green washing" term that it is "clean." No such thing as Green Peace tells us in numerous studies. Besides, the coal industry repudiates the technology that is suspect. Nuclear has never resolved the spent radio active waste problem. If you honestly believe that philanthropic values are going to wipe out the greed fueling our dysfunctional political system, then we are further away from transformational praxis than ever before. Obama is just another pragmatic politico in the pockets of the corporate elite. You people are setting yourself up for a very big fall. History also demonstrates that the political pendulum swings back and forth. Seven years ago we saw the rise of the Republicans, now it is the Dems. Corporations win either way: the pendulum will swing back again in time. If I were you, I would start preparing yourself for survival mode when the superstructure comes crashing down.
Authentic change always happens at the local level. Usually brought about by personal habits that embrace limits. Neither of which can be found at the national level or the herd of sheep marching lock step behind their latest savior.
Korten's proposals are definitely not Obama's. But neither Korten nor I am talking about Obama. Reread the second paragraph. Korten's article can in fact be read as a criticism of Obama. The point is, Korten is basically offering guidelines for designing a sustainable economy. Is it true that "authentic change always happens at the local level"? That sounds like mindless dogma to me. What about when the government grants solar energy tax credits, prompting widespread construction of solar power installations? Where, essentially, has the change occurred?
Korten's first sentence in his second paragraph contradicts itself in light of Obama's votes funding the elites at the top via the 700 corporate giveaway, and others proposed but pending approval. You also affirmed this in your first post: "If individuals promoting certain values can establish public institutions that embody them, then they will be self-propagating." then you assert that you and Korten are not talking about Obama. How does one establish your values without taking over the institution first moving it to embrace the values you endorse?
Speaking of dogma, nowhere did I read an answer to coyote's question which in my view was a good one. In your initial rebuttal was an assertion that institutions would be magically transformed with values trumping capitalism, greed, and selfishness. Coyote asked you to name one such political institution. Since you avoided the question, I assume you are in agreement with its context.
Korten's sentiments are nobel if unrealistic. Twenty years ago, I often attended spiritual conferences the type Korten now offers with other people calling themselves "spiritual teachers" like Dr. Macy to name one. I remember vividly walking through the parking lot of the conference center where the participants were parking their SUV's and other gas guzzling car and trucks, many with bumper stickers proclaiming their fidelity to the Earth. Always struck me as the worst kind of hubris. This year I attended the Bioneers conference and was again struck by the same norms of the participants packing the parking lot with their SUV's and gas guzzlers noting no significant change from twenty years ago. Hardly a scientific study but valid nevertheless.
People rarely will change their values of consumption based on other standards hostile to their addictive life style choices. Those who do, live in the minority. I have not owned a vehicle for over twenty years using public transportation instead, or my bike. But in point of fact, any efforts to clean up the mess requires authentic environmental legislation. To now claim your independence from Obama and the political system is a non starter for the Earth community of beings. Korten is shouting at a moving train that is growing distant from his point of reference, and so are you, my friend. I might also point out that there is some level of paradox if not hypocrisy to preach about sustainability while publishing books written on paper, or jetting all over the planet to give conferences via carbon producing transportation. Korten might consider checking his own life style choices, if he is really interested in human and planetary transformation. I think that was the point coyote was making, but I will let him speak for himself or herself.
Moreover, tax credits for solar or hybrids (which you did not name) are enfranchised credits They represent inducements for wealthy americans. It would surprise me if the middle class has a spare 15 to 20k available to invest in solar panels or those with even less dispose able income (like the working poor) to invest in those options. Furthermore, people living in the first world rarely take such action given their addictive mobility practices. I doubt the percentages of those who take advantage of those types of tax credits will significantly impact the scope of the degradation. While tax credits may be a step in the right direction, it represents only a drop in the ocean of tidal cross currents working against us. That is also why Obama's solution in contradictory. Whatever he achieves with sustainable solutions will be more than offset with his inflexible bent tied to unsustainable practices, i.e. Bio, Nuclear, and Coal. And given the carrying capacity of the earth via population growth along with the advance of wealth in China, seems we are turning to more addictive consumption choices driven by greed. The problems are growing exponentially to the solutions. Or to put it differently, the solutions represent too little, too late, to impact the spiraling dysfunction of modern man. Life as we know it died about twenty years ago, but it is only now being felt. The comfort Americans have taken for granted is undergoing transition, and when the crash comes, the wake up call will be equally disturbing and force radical corrections for those riding a top their personal illusions.
Until people admit their addictions and enter recovery programs (and abnormal consumption is surely an addiction) nothing will likely change. Recovery cannot introduce new values if the addict cannot first admit he or she has a problem. Admission is the first step to recovery. And interventions are qualitatively different than is the feel good philosophies of the so called lightworkers. This might be a better place for Korten to focus his efforts. Intervention produces pain before the light kicks in.
Yeah right, Obama is growing the economy from the "bottom up" by financing the economy from the top down. Did this visionary ever hear of the the 700 billion giveaway to the Wall Street Elites, or the 50 Billion to the Auto Industry? Even after Obama promised to punish industries who took jobs overseas. I guess punishment for Obama is granting a 50 Billion bailout. Korten, like his pal, Hartmann, provides the best eco la la obfuscation one can find on airwaves...keep up the good work David as our Earth Mother spews the corporate poison, and the gluttonous consumption patterns the so called progressives can muster.
coyote:
David Korten has done more to curb the corporate poison and gluttonous consumption habits than almost any other person in the world. Read his books before you spew more of your own poison.
Spoken like a true Bushite and his one size fits all narrative. Just what we need another sycophantic hero worshiper!
Obama isn't perfect but he's the best President we've ever had.
He had to vote for the bailout. He had no choice if he wanted to be elected.
Besides, what the US is doing with the bailout is the same way nearly every country in the world is choosing to react to the financial crisis.
Is there anything you actually like about Obama? If he said, "I like the sunshine", would you choose to hate it? Give the man a break! He is working for the greater good.
"Obama isn't perfect but he's the best President we've ever had."
AT least let him get sworn in sheesh.
it's all great if it means I don't have to work some drudge job in a huge, ugly, hate filled urban center.
Excellent statement of the problem and steps toward a solution. But we must also eliminate interest (usury) since interest also magnifies debt beyond principal and results in economic collapse.
See www.perfecteconomy.com.
If you had an idea and needed a loan, didn't want a "partner" to buy in and possibly mess with your vision, then what would you do? I know bin Laden insists that usury is evil, but to me, only exorbitant usury is bad.
Not only do I prefer interest-free loans, they don't require an expansion of the money supply (inflation) to repay. Think about it: Any multiplication of debt beyond the amount of the principal requires growth of the economy. But growth is not sustainable. In our economy there is endless commoditization and monetization of goods, services and resources in an effort to pay off this debt. But it is not possible. An easily understood essay on this is Charles Eisenstein's "Money and the Crisis of Civilization" at http://www.hopedance.org/cms/content/view/556/113/.
"Not only do I prefer interest-free loans,"
That would be my preference too, but can you imagine why anyone would loan money without a financial incentive?
The loan could just as easily come directly from the Treasury, with no intermediary bank to claim the interest garnered on said loan. The interest would flow back to the public which could then be reinvested into future loans, or into the expansion of public works. Or Treasury subsidized interest-free loans to start up needed regional economies. We don't need banks to coagulate sufficient capital to fund large projects, a bolus of capital can be injected directly from the source. Though, if implemented this way it shouldn't rightly be called usury.