A Crisis of American Capitalism
You don't have to be a socialist (and I certainly am not) to understand that this capitalistic country is confronting a crisis of capitalism. This is not merely a matter of the huge losses and meltdowns that have taken place and have threatened to bring down the whole system with them. It is also a matter of the failure of a culture, a culture that has grown and grown since the sainted Reagan introduced the twin pillars of his morning in America: unchecked greed and militarism.
Militarism today holds high carnival: in Iraq, on somewhere between 700 and 1,100 American bases around the world (the exact number being a secret, even if known to the Pentagon), on huge carriers patrolling seas all over the world, in Bush/Cheney ideas that we should intervene all over the world, in a Pentagon budget of what -- something in the neighborhood of 500 billion dollars or more, I suppose?
Unchecked greed also held high carnival, as it drove the housing market ever higher by means visibly pregnant with failure because they defied history, economics, human comprehension and sense: Adjustable rate mortgages, with initially low rates that one knew -- I certainly knew, often said, acted accordingly, and wholly fail to grasp why everyone didn't know -- were pregnant with disaster because they would be unsustainable for the buyers when the interest rates increased, as inevitably they would because rates always rise and fall; securitization that gave rise to so-called tranches so complicated that nobody could understand what the risks and rights were; derivatives which may be even more complicated and which nobody has a real handle on apparently. It was all nuts (as this writer often said to people), and now it has come crashing down, as was inevitable. The acclaimed geniuses -- like Alan Greenspan (who led the way) -- who lived in and loved celebrification, who profited from it, have been shown the fools that they are. In Greenspan's case, this is at least the second burst bubble he promoted, the other being the high tech stock market which melted down at the beginning of the 2000s. (Of course, in America, where nothing succeeds like failure, as is oft typified by celebrified coaches, baseball managers and university presidents, Greenspan remains a great man.)
The heads of major firms have likewise fallen, as their houses of cards collapsed. The fall of titans represents a horrid, economy-threatening failure of the culture of greed, dishonesty (which often was a major part of pushing the insane instruments on uncomprehending buyers), and unchecked capitalism, the culture which has been pushed on us by conservative intellectuals, politicians and the uncomprehending mainstream media since Reagan took office in 1981. This vile culture (and the militarism which is in some important ways associated with it (e.g., a war for oil, huge profits for contractors)), came to dominate much of the American nation. Now the culture of unchecked greed and celebrification of its richest practitioners has come acropper (as did the war in Iraq). That it would come acropper was inevitable, based as it was on stupidity. Leaders have been exposed as fools -- yet again.
Here is an interesting fillip to this point. Goldman Sachs is one of the few huge investment houses which has not gone down, at least not yet. From what I've read, the reason is that Goldman was smarter than the others. It sold the garbage to others, it sold the securitized crap to anyone who wanted to buy it, but, from what I gather, it did not keep any of it. So it was not stuck with hundreds of millions or billions of worthless or deeply discountable securities on its books, as the others were. One might say that Goldman was very greedy, like the rest of them, so it made tons of money selling the garbage to fools, but it was a lot smarter than the rest of them because it apparently knew that what it was selling was garbage that should not be allowed to drag down Goldman's own value by being owned by Goldman. Which, of course, raises the question of isn't it morally worse, maybe morally far worse, on the one hand, to sell other people stuff you know is such garbage that you won't keep it on your own books as part of your own assets, than to sell them stuff, on the other hand, that you yourself consider good enough to keep on your own books as part of your own asset base? The latter represents "only" a triumph of stupidity. The former represents sheer immorality, doesn't it? (And the irony, of course, is that what happened to the other houses which held the stuff may yet drag down Goldman too.)
You know, both stupidity and greed seem always to be with us, sometimes in combination, sometimes separately. Particular examples of them over the years have stuck in my mind indelibly, but I shall skip the details. Suffice to say here that, in the public realm, greed and stupidity are promoted by the corporate mainstream mass media's constant promotion of the conventional wisdom, the MSM's blotting out of non-celebrity voices of opposition to the conventional wisdom, and the MSM's celebrification of fools. Of course, since the mainstream media has such a huge percentage of people who are not very competent or intelligent, maybe it is hopeless to expect better from it. Regardless, we shall have to figure out some way to overcome the roadblock of the MSM, no doubt using the internet in some way.
That, however, is for the future. For the present, we are seeing the meltdown of a culture of unchecked greed and stupidity that has been the driving force in American capitalism since Reagan took office and began 27 years of propagandizing for this. Government is now seeking to lessen the effects of this capitalistic crisis by bailing out the big boys, the Wall Streeters. We are told, of course, that they have to be bailed out lest the whole economy, and maybe even the world's economy, undergo collapse. And what we are told is true, I would guess. But also noticeable -- and, as always, expected -- is who is getting the short end of the stick. It is the small guys, the small people who get no relief on the mortgages whose interest rates are now way too high for them, the small investors who are losing their shirts, and the like. This, too, of course, is a despicable part of American culture: help the big boys and screw the small man. And this too has been ever more prevalent since the days -- dare I say it yet again -- of the falsely sainted Reagan.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
46 Comments so far
Show Allsnydly
It may look like rough-running capitalism to you, but it looks like oligarchic looting running at top speed to me.
Unchecked greed and militarism has been the American way well before Reagan. The peace, love and hippies 1960s was a response to unchecked greed and militarism and nothing much has changed. On second thought, something has changed. The unchecked greed and militarism GMO super chickensturkeys are coming home to roost.
Part of the problem is in the Author's very first line..."(I am) CERTAINLY not a socialist".
Maybe, if the USA today was a little more "socialist" -that is to say more collective in its appraoch to itself, to the world and the "otherness" of most other people in the world- there would be a more effective counterbalance to the "eternal" American ME FIRST that is so apparent to all too many that do not live in The States. As a Canadian, we are fighting our very own Reagan/Republican stuff right now- the couterbalance of some native "socialism"
has helped frame the debate- on whether we should effectively become "more American"...no offense...many of us DO NOT.Our "Canadian of the Century" (Tommy Douglas, check him out) was a BIG TIME Socialist- hence our Public Health System, etc. From across the border we have LOTS of love and respect for America- also- a very deep distrust of the hyper Patriotism that so often puts other countries into "last place" reflexively- the hyper Capitalism that seems so very dog-eat-dog ALL the time- the hyper militarism that makes us wonder WHO will next suffer from a military known (sadly) for excess...so...I respectfully say that a more collective, dare I say "socialist" attitude may well be a countervail against the RAMPANT excess of a Country out of touch with it BEST impulses- now removed from the Spirit of one of the finest Declarations in all Human History...please, for your FRIENDS as well...be your TRUE SELVES!
I worry for the rich.
Thank God we still have socialism for the rich. How would they make the payments on their multi-million dollar mansions and Mercedes’ without a little helping hand from Joe Middle Class American Taxpayer. Like you, I often worry for the rich too.
The American Dream is failing because the American Dream has become the world's nightmare.
http://blogoffanddie.wordpress.com
So long Dubya, we'll always have debt and Guantanamo
It would appear as if a persistent American trait has bitten its' people in the ass: neglecting to learn from history. The history I allude to is the Great Depression and how it came about (the USA's prior economic downturns, such as 1873, should have been instructive as well). Instead, led by Grandpa Caligula (Ronald Reagan), the USA began to chip away at the New Deal (which is a long term goal of the Republican Party) to the almost destroyed state that it is now in. Just as in 1932, the United States is in a critical moment where the wrong choice could be catastrophic.
Ah the American Dream:
even the small man can make a fortune
even little johnny can be a baseball star or the president
I'm going to be a rock star
eveyone can have a house and a car(s), and travel a hundred miles an hour on
an interstate system built for fast speed
if we work hard and save a little money we can retire with peace of mind
we have the best health care system in the world
yes we pay our rock stars and sports heroes millions and the teachers of our
children get doodley squat and little respect
this whole system is now built on credit, the collapse will be when we won't be able to continue to consume at the rate we have been, jobs disappear, the debt is recalled and cannot be paid. Printing and distributing more money seems like a bandaid that will not stick.
Maybe out of the ashes will come the human dream, to live together in peace and conserve and share our resources.
Sounds like Mr. Velvel wants to bandage up the old capitalist beast and run him again. That is the sign of a true capitalist, you know. THERE ARE NO ALTERNATIVES!! Heh heh.
The author says he's not a socialist. Christ, how could you not be a socialist after all of what is going down?
I'll wear the Red Star folks.
I'm living with my parents in a house that's falling apart. They finally paid off their house a few years ago, and now it needs all these repairs. I may have to take out a loan in order to help them fix up the house since my credit is better than theirs.
5 grand for a new roof among other things.
Every neighborhood is going to turn into slum at this rate. I have no idea how people are making it. It is sickening beyond belief that big mortgage companies, airlines, and energy suppliers get thrown life preservers yet the little people are left to drown. Unfortunately at least a lot of us can swim, and when we get back to shore, watch out. We are the sleeping dragon.
The nightly "news" is reporting Senator Obama is on board for the bailout.
Senator Obama:
Instead of slathering $1 trillion of lipstick on the fascist pigs that have brought us to the brink of disaster how 'bout indebting the taxpayers for works programs rebuilding our infrastructure, our manufacturing base, our new green economy? If you're gonna stick us with another $1 trillion how 'bout building a demand-side economy? We don't want your stinking cheap, easy credit on the company store model. We want ample jobs paying living wages. We'll open our own banks and businesses, barter and trade and rebuild an America of, by, and for We the People . Assume the position or strap on a pair.
So, out of curiosity, for whom are you voting, if you are voting?
&YYY&
The ultimate answer is repudiate the Vampire States dollar as entirely worthless, and for the VS to bring out a controlled amount of the new currency, distributed fairly on a population basis, former banking and stock market billionaires excluded.
The VS ReichMark as the new currency might be known, parallels the history of German war reparations in the Weirmar Republic after world war one, after a period of hyperinflation the German Mark was sometime burnt for warmth, because the wood it could buy did burn as long as the huge amounts of paper money required to buy it. The old currency became stupid and pointless, just like VS foreign policy.
To mollify foreign creditors, some agreements on war reparations in the new currency will have to be made, and the population of the VS will spend the rest of their lives in slavery to the wage conditions of China in order to survive.
l'm sure it will be fine in the end, Johnny Boy will let them keep their tax breaks and the real smart ones have plenty of gold and other assets stashed far away from the maddening crowd. When the peasents do come charging the castle with ropes and pitchforks they will be greeted with cauldrons of flaming crude, the helicopters will whisk away the lords and ladies to a secure location.Someone suggested the next good investments will be canned goods, bottled water, and plenty of ammunition.
"Someone suggested the next good investments will be canned goods, bottled water, and plenty of ammunition."
Someone is absolutely correct.
-- EKATON --
Well, contrary to the author, I am definitely a socialist. Have been one all my life.
And I can just lean back and say to the author: Rant as much as you want, Marx predicted all that 150 years ago.
Capitalism is as Capitalism does. And it does what it needs to do by its own very logic. You're watching its essence live right now.
It is true. Anyone who still claims to be a "free" mkt capitalist is either rich or stupid.
But, I fear, that still wont stop the US terror of "socialism!!!" Which they are dumb enough to believe is "communism!!!!!!". Which would cause a big lockdown of the govt, and a police state and theyd make everyone work for the state.
Who are people working for now, Wall Street? This is no "freedom". It's a grand illusion.
OK let me get this straight. The government through massive chicanery, illegal war (and war profiteering) etc. etc. has sucked bazillions of dollars out of the pockets of americans and into the pockets of a few CEOs and politicians. Now the Fed, a privately owned for-profit bank, is going to loan a ton of that money back to us, charging interest of course. WTF?? And no one is talking about it honestly in the media, of course. Economic crash my Aunt Fanny. This is all a well engineered rip-off. How are the personal fortunes of the Bushes, Clintons, Cheneys, Rumsfelds, McCains, etc etc? ALL GROWING at our expense.
At what point will americans get it that they have allowed themselves to be utterly scammed, and hold the thieves accountable? I know, I know, most people are too busy watching TV and believing what they are told to be as outraged as they have a right to be.
I have tried (I mean I've really tried) to wrap my mind around all of this and my main consolation is that I have not paid any taxes in the past 8-10 years. I guess it boils down to no gain/no loss. My other consolation is that part of my past taxes that I have paid I have recouped in food stamps. I hope that doesn't piss a lot of people off in a lot of ways. But, if so -- *shrug*.
Damn, it might even please the Grover Norquist types! [grin]
So Goldaman Sachs did a "little better".
And they gave $10m million of it to Semator Obamas.
Dafoe
"The business of America is business" that has been the prime directive of amercan politics for a century and will be regardless of what is in office, the repugnants or demis, remember everything is for sale.. No big secret. If you want more of the same, vote for either one and don't complain There is a crisis and you look to the perpetuaters to provide a solution? If you want change start a new party that has a better vision for the nation or be like the second republic of Vermont people and go for secession. A nation that choose the Shrub twice fer presdent says it is bereft of its senses and this crisis is just a continuation of the others that have happened with the repugnants in office. They were to know the cost of everything and the value of nothing as good neo-cons , well it seems the don't know the cost of anything either.
I heard Vermont was seceeding, so I called Sen Leahy's office --really! I did. I used to live in New Hampshire, but it was way too conservative. ( I had been there in August--it was so beautiful, I didnt bother to check out what a tiny town like Berlin would be like socially) I lasted two years.
Leahys' office said he "did not have any idea". Does anybody know if they are considering it now?
"The Second Vermont Republic is a nonviolent citizens' network and think tank opposed to the tyranny of Corporate America and the U.S. government, and committed to the peaceful return of Vermont to its status as an independent republic and more broadly the dissolution of the Union."
See http://www.vermontrepublic.org/ for complete information.
-- ekaton --
If you spend all your money buying guns to take over the neighborhood and your neighbor's possesions and fail to do so, you will be in trouble. If you borrow money to gamble and you lose, you will be in trouble as well. In the meantime, the money you spent on guns and the amount you borrowed to gamble, and now lost, didn't go to repair the plumbing, didn't go to pay for education of your children and didn't go to insure your children's health. There is the result. You are now broke, the basement is flooded, your kids are ignorant and their health in danger. Is that difficult to understand?.............lizard
This is not a crisis of capitalism. the Soviet Union went through the same process and was in no way capitalist. This is a crisis of mismanagement. Like the Soviets, the US has neglected some basic rules of accounting. You can only live beyond your means for a limited time. This is true for individuals, household, and countries. These mismanagers borrowed to gamble and lost. This could have happened in any place, regardeles of whether the means of production are privately ( capitalism) or state (communism) owned. It doesn't matter who owns it, but rather how it is managed......................lizard
excellent point!
Do I have this correct? Henry Paulson is giving away our "funny" farm in order to get the Wall Street bucket brigade to start throwing water on the burning farmhouse that the bucket brigade boys (and their gov'ment buddies) set fire to. Kinda messes with your head, doesn't it?
Someone tell me if this analogy is way wrong:
A guy goes into a casino. He put his entire savings of $10k on the crap table. He looses. An authority demands $2 from the other 5,000 people there - because this guy CAN'T loose his life savings. He gets part of his money back and the rest is invested in an even higher odds bet. IF it pays off, he gets the rest of his money & the others divvy up the rest (after expenses are taken out - of course).
This seems to be what George just said today. We have to bail out AIG - but there's a risk. How the fuck is this any different?
Don't ask questions, just pay the Man when he shows up and don't worry, he's got his own, I mean, your own best interest at heart.
capitalism requires destroying the living planet to make product fully intended to rapidly become waste to be immediately replaced by additional product...we cannot afford to continue to make product, nor to dispose of it, no matter what ism we use to name this activity...the ecological impacts of economic decisions cannot be left to market forces or driven individuals...
Protecting the powerful at the expense of the powerless has been the business of civilization since the Roman Empire. It was this which Karl Marx was pointing out fundamentally. Unfortunately since he modeled his theory of economy upon Adam Smith, he shares its failings.
Economics is a pseudo-science inconsistent with its own principles. The royal astrologers of today are attempting nothing more than a complex babble to hold enough confidence in the economy to keep panic behavior from calling in all debts everywhere.
A genuine economics must recognize that economy is governed by production (as Adam Smith observed), and production is governed by the laws of thermodynamics (which were first promulgated 75 years after publication of Wealth of Nations.) Because of the second law of thermodynamics, profits cannot inhere in transactions, they can only be obtained from victims: the environment, the public, the customers, the competitors, the workers, people of other nations. We must insist upon democratic control, not market control, over the economy as the only moral choice.
Absolutely. Democratic control, as I see it, is the only moral way to go. It makes no sense that those affected by industry and the market are isolated from participating in its direction.
Truly, the current crisis affords us a great opportunity to reflect on, refine, and communicate our values.
I've listened carefully these past few weeks to Bernanke, Paulson and most recently Barney Frank (C-Span interview). All are preaching one flavor or other of the same recipe:
1. We have no choice; we have to step in.
2. Clearly, deregulation went too far.
3. Frank went further and talked about a Federal role in helping homeowners faced with foreclosure.
Well, friends, that's just not good enough ... not even close.
It is of no long-term consequence or significance whether the Federal government bails out so many failed corporations. It is of no great consequence whether we come down on one side or the other of the great debate about the right level of regulation and oversight. It is of no major consequence whether we blame Republicans, Democrats, or both.
To empower such distractions and allow them to become the central focus blinds us from the essence of the problems we face ... and from their solutions.
The real question, never raised in the mainstream media of course, is NOT why so many greedy financial institutions were permitted to make risky sub-prime loans to citizens hoping to buy a house for their families; the real question is why so many Americans in a country as wealthy as the US are in this situation in the first place.
Real wages have not increased in the US since the early 1970's in spite of monumental increases in worker productivity. The rich, indeed, have gotten much richer while the poor and almost the entire middle class have grown much poorer. We are, most of us, a nation at risk. Our manufacturing base was exported by corporate America to serve their own greed. Our jobs, even in the high tech industry, were exported. Our health care system has all but collapsed with more than 100 million Americans unable to afford the care they need. Whether they understand it or not, even those who can afford coverage and care are not more than one serious illness away from bankruptcy.
We must not view the current crisis in the narrow terms of assessing blame and tweaking regulations.
Consider this from an old Common Dreams article on the bankruptcy bill (http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0312-03.htm):
"According to a recent Harvard study, around half of all personal bankruptcies are the result of illness or medical bills."
If Americans earned at least a living wage, if our national policies were designed to help the working man and woman instead of treasonous corporations and their shareholders, if health care were a basic human right instead of a commodity, if we measured success based on how we helped our fellow countrymen instead of the rate of return on our portfolios, perhaps then we could begin a real national dialog on how to solve our current fiscal problems.
Instead, policymakers will tweak a failed system a little this way and a little that way. No discussions of real change will occur. For a short time, perhaps, things will look like they are back under control. Trust me, until the central problems are addressed, there is no path home.
Excellent.
Hear hear, WelshTerrier2!
"Real wages have not increased in the US since the early 1970's in spite of monumental increases in worker productivity. The rich, indeed, have gotten much richer while the poor and almost the entire middle class have grown much poorer. We are, most of us, a nation at risk. Our manufacturing base was exported by corporate America to serve their own greed. Our jobs, even in the high tech industry, were exported. Our health care system has all but collapsed with more than 100 million Americans unable to afford the care they need. Whether they understand it or not, even those who can afford coverage and care are not more than one serious illness away from bankruptcy."
Another good description of class warfare in the "United" States.
-- EKATON --
'You don't have to be a socialist (and I certainly am not)'
Yes, you are a law professor not a socialist. You believe that the US is a system of useless 'law' that means nothing to the average person any more other than repression and law for the rich, right? Fact is, the US legal system is in about as much collapse as the capitalist economic one which this author also is a supporter of.
Big Business for the law, and the law professor for Big Business! Some critique...? Is this the best that CD can come up with? ...blaming it all on 'stupidity' and 'greed' while continuing to defend the capitalist system itself?
Yes, the american legal system is corrupted beyond recognition, as Judge Edith Jones USCA for the 5th Circuit observed a few years back.
But Velvel sees it for what it is.
As Brandeis observed nearly a century ago, the law will be respected when it is respectable.
American Capitalism was doomed from the moment Sir Walter Raleigh stepped foot on our shores. American Capitalism is based on the exploitation, of human and natural resources, not the sustainable management of resources.
What will replace American Capitalism is Greenomics.
Do The World A Favor And Retire!
Green Retirement Planning
The next Obama ad should be "This is the amount each American now owes $xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx (increases every second)".
That's actually a good idea, you should send it to him, because this focus on Palin's lipstick and McCain's inability to use a computer is getting him nowhere.
The title of this article is a misnomer. It's becoming clear that we never were a "capitalist" nation. This continent's fortunes were built on royalty-sponsored trading companies, slave labor, military conquest of land, indentured servitude, off-shoring to the developing world -- and moving our manufacturing backbone to a "communist" country (China). There's nothing capitalistic or "free-" market at play here. Ours lacks a good word, but I'm thinking fascism comes pretty close.
A few years ago I saw a copy of the original land grant (from the king) map of my county in Delaware. On it were the family names of both of my landlords (kind of gives that word an extra zing) for my home and my business. Also the names of every multi millionare in the area.
There was a revolution, a new constitution, a civil war, world wars, depressions and over two hundred years of change and the decendants of the king of england's lackeys are still in charge. Amazing!
Very interesting you should write that up as an article and post it here.
You are correct in everything you write, except we are capitalist, venture capitialists. It was venture capitalists who founded the United States.
I'd dispute that -- it was European monarchies which founded the US, by funding privateers/Conquistadors, etc. They had to answer to monarchs, until they became monarchs themselves. "Capitalism" is a pipe-dream predicated on adequate knowledge on the part of the buyer/seller, no coercion of economic transactions, etc.
It's simply wrong to call this capitalism. Fascism, tyranny, tribute, corporotism, national socialism (socialized risk, privatized profits), etc. But not capitalism -- unless you want to argue that all of these characteristics DEFINE capitalism (and then I might be inclined to agree).
We are in basic agreement. Today's CEO's can trace their DNA, to the pirates turned businessmen, that founded our country.
I'll just point out, Virginia Tobacco, Hudson Bay Company, East India, and many others. All venture capital companies, who paid royalties, and gained monopolies.
The greatest contribution of the American Revolution, was not political democracy, it was the democratization of capital, the NYSE was opened a few years after the revolution.
Do The World A Favor And Retire!
Green Retirement Planning
"The fall of titans represents a horrid, economy-threatening failure of the culture of greed, dishonesty (which often was a major part of pushing the insane instruments on uncomprehending buyers), and unchecked capitalism, the culture which has been pushed on us by conservative intellectuals, politicians and the uncomprehending mainstream media since Reagan took office in 1981."
Don't forget the (expletive deleted) Democrats, the junior partners in this debacle. Having happily joined forces with the Repimplicans to become The Filthy Lucre Party, they are equally as guilty. When all this goes, collapses utterly, you can be sure that neither Nancy Pelosi nor Diane Feinstein nor John Corzine, etc. will take a bath in the same dark, dirty water as the rest of us. In the USA it is not true that there is a sucker born every minute; there are tens of thousands of them.