EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Above the Drone of War, Voices for Peace
In 1876, at the so-called Battle of the Little Bighorn when U.S. Cavalry regiments attacked an Indian village along the Little Bighorn River in Wyoming, the first casualty was a ten-year old Lakota Sioux boy named Deeds. Unaware that U.S. troops were nearby planning an attack, he and his father were combing a hillside looking for a lost pony when U.S. troops encountered and killed him. The next casualties were six Lakota women and four children, who were murdered while in a field gathering wild radish bulbs, one of the many indigenous plants that Native people depended on for their livelihood, and hardly a threatening activity.
Youth Peace Volunteers from Kabul and Bamiyan visiting with students at Nangarhar University in Jalalabad.
I think of these events today because of the recent killings of Afghan civilians, not only the 17 women and children killed in villages outside Kandahar, but also two recent and less publicized atrocities resulting from NATO airstrikes that killed civilians in Kapisa Province, including eight Afghan boys who were tending their sheep. Sheepherding, of course, is an activity as integral to their livelihood as gathering indigenous plants was to Lakota people.
Studying the past can reveal patterns that may replicate themselves in the present or future. The U.S. Calvary was tracking Sitting Bull and the Lakota Sioux people because they had refused to sell the Black Hills, land in present-day South Dakota that was both an important resource gathering site and a sacred spiritual site. Not many years before, it had been legally set aside as “Indian Territory.” But in 1874, an official US military expedition led by none other than George Armstrong Custer discovered gold in the Black Hills. More gold would be extracted from one of the Black Hills mines than from any other mine on the continent. So, for the love of gold, women and children were killed and an entire culture was under increased threat.
As my friend Randall Amster noted during a presentation last week at Prescott College, “We forget that the U.S. is waging a resource war in Afghanistan.” Randall was referring in part to the known reserves of natural gas resources in Turkmenistan, and the pipeline that the U.S. wants to see built to carry it to burgeoning energy markets in Pakistan and India. The pipeline, on the drawing board since 1995 when Hamid Karzai was a Director of UNOCAL, is planned to traverse south-central Afghanistan. Randall also referenced another form of extractable wealth, not gold but the potentially huge mineral deposits in Afghanistan, especially rare earth minerals necessary for the computer and telecommunications industries. We should be as appalled by blood for natural gas and rare earth minerals as we are by blood for gold.
Our understanding of historical events does more than illuminate patterns of human behavior. It also limits our imagination, influencing our sense of what is possible. Sadly, the popular history of US-Indian relations during the 19th Century focuses on military adventures fought on the Great Plains and largely unencumbered by questions of morality. Omitted are the many stories of White settlers who befriended and aided Native people. Also omitted is the nonviolence advocated by groups like the Quakers who opposed U.S. expansion and militarism. And what about the Native people who would have been willing to share their resources and co-exist with settlers if they could have maintained their sovereignty and their way of life? Their names and their voices are largely lost to us, drowned by the war cries of stereotyped Plains Indian warriors. In California, the earliest European settlers found that Native people were good trading partners and good neighbors who exchanged gifts with explorers. In 1595, when the Spanish explorer Sebastian Cermano ran aground on the Marin County coast, Native people came to the aid of the crew, providing them with food and other aid without which they would not have survived. In the late 18th Century, looking to establish a fur trading outpost, Russia dropped 12 men off on one of the Aleutian Islands, where a highly developed Native culture flourished. For seven years these men had no contact with people off the island. Again, they survived – indeed thrived, intermarrying with Native people – only because of Native generosity, hospitality, and openness.
Given the “news” from Afghanistan which focuses on military actions, and the popular image of Afghan people as “tribal” with all its attendant associations of “backward, repressive, and violent,” can we even envision a home-grown nonviolence movement in Afghanistan? And yet, as hard as it may be to imagine, this is exactly what a group of young Afghans is trying to spark. And they are doing it with courage and determination. Calling themselves the Afghan Youth Peace Volunteers (AYPV), they have moved their base from Bamiyan Province – remotely located and largely populated by Hazara and Tajik people – to Kabul, where Pashtun youth have joined them and where they are benefitting from opportunities to interact and work with a diverse group of educated, progressive Afghans, people who are drawn to their infectious energy and determination and their view of the future as a realm they can shape.
These are young people who have direct experience of war and poverty. Every one of them has stories to tell about close family members who have been killed, injured, or disappeared. They know what war does to people. They know the history of foreign military intervention in their country over the last four decades, and they reject it. They know the history and teachings of Mohandas Gandhi, Abdul Ghaffar Khan, and the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., and they embrace it. And they know the stakes: their lives and their futures. They want a legitimate government in power in their country, not the corrupt puppet of an occupying power. They want to share in the political process and in the benefits of local and regional economic activity, including extracting their country’s resources. As one of their members, Faiz, said on a recent phone conversation, “It is important for young Afghans to connect with each other. We are the future. We are the ones who will bring about change.”
They are raising a voice for nonviolence in Afghanistan and speaking out clearly and thoughtfully on important current issues, such as the Strategic Partnership Agreement. And they are doing the hard and risky work of building friendships and alliances. Following Mohandas Gandhi, and knowing that reaching out across ethnic divides is essential for any peace process in their country, they are now engaged in a Caravan of Nonviolence in Afghanistan. They’ve just returned from visits to Parwan Province, to Jalalabad, the capital of Nangarhar Province, and to Kapisa Province, where the sheepherders were killed earlier this winter.
In addition to these meetings with youth in other provinces, they are preparing actions which symbolize the need for ethnic reconciliation and for nonviolent alternatives to war. Later this year, they plan a multi-ethnic, gender-diverse peace walk from Kabul to Parwan Province. And on December 10, 2012, International Day of Human Rights, they are planning an international peace vigil called “2 Million Friends to End the Afghan War.” Vigils, to be held in Kabul and in other Afghan provinces, will include lighting candles, releasing doves, bearing banners, and other symbols and statements advocating nonviolence. Peace and justice groups worldwide are invited to join them through the simple action of lighting candles. Youth they met and spoke with during their Caravan of Nonviolence will participate in both of these actions.
It is hard to imagine the U.S. government acting nonviolently in Afghanistan, seeking out and supporting people and processes that engender peace and reconciliation. But can we at least imagine ourselves doing this? The Afghan Youth Peace Volunteers ask for something more. They ask for our participation. In concert with Voices for Creative Nonviolence, they are calling on people around the world to take part in the December 10th action by organizing a vigil in our local communities. For information on how to participate, contact the author at (dsmithferri@gmail.com).
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


15 Comments so far
Show AllThis peace movement, like all prior peace movement against the American empire, will fail.
A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492 to the Present, by Ward Churchill.
http://www.amazon.com/Little-Matter-Genocide-Holocaust-Americas/dp/0872863239/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1332712355&sr=1-1
Hi David:
So much may be said in so little a word count. There would be reason to rejoice if the sentiments expressed in this song were no longer valid. Your article let's us peek inside your interior castle - a lit one too with more than one window. David, thank you.
Went to the museum, red brother
Saw your ancient bloom cut, pressed and dried
A sign said wasn't it clever what they used to do
But it never did say how they died
Went to Regina, red sister
Heard a cab driver say what he'd seen
"There's a grand place to eat out on Number One
All white ladies if you know what I mean"
Went to a pow wow, red brother
Felt the people's lovejoy flow around
It left me crying just thinking about it
How they used my saviour's name to keep you down
Hey hey hey
Truly it makes me smile, feel hope and trust that within the upcoming generations, whether here in the U.S. - or in regions where my country is at war, there is a movement toward peace. I trust their energy will inspire those of us in earlier generations who experience intermittent dispair or fatigue with the ongoing effort toward nonviolence. Thanks to Mr. David Smith-Ferri for writing eloquently on how the collective approach we have utilized in past generations should not discourage us from making a focused intention and effort now in collaboration with the AYPV toward the most optimistic future humanity can envision.
An interesting exploration from another angle around what it will take to move ourselves toward peace looks at the commonalities leading up to the lives surrendered by Trayvon Martin and Abdul Rahman Bin Anwar al-Awalki (the fourth American citizen killed by a U.S. drone strike in Yemen since 2002).
"Two American Teenagers. Two American Killers.
Two situations where powers that be have reacted with silence.
= Two powerfully different collective conversations?
The article (link below) explores how the heightened discussion we are havng in the aftermath of Travyon Martin's death can serve as an opportunity to shift our collective conversation to one that explores how the fear of being perceived as weak permeates us at the individual and collective level. This fear is killing our children, our fellow humans in countries we are (and are not) at war with, and our sense of confidence for the future."
To read the piece go to: < http://www.bridge2vision.blogspot.com >
Again, many thanks David. I am so appreciative to have encountered your message here at Common Dreams.
Powerful article. And I am ashamed that I grew up believing the lies that the Indians were the savages and not the White men.
I know that all the coups, wars, invasions were not done to protect my freedom. They have all been done because others have the resources the greedy people want.
I know the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions were because of the oil and other treasures.
Hopefully if the pipeline is ever built, the people will destroy it. Same as the Keystone.
How is it that a foreign nation can claim emminent domain in the US?
And our treasonous pres and Kongress support it for their oil buddies? And their pockets.
The US has killed over 9,000,000,000 people sinces its inception.
Who is really the biggest threat to the world?
With the CIA and others in over 80 countries. Kidnapping, torturing and murdering people.
Over 800 bases and all the soldiers to occupy them, while the US goes down the toilet.
And people ride around in the Hummers with the support the troops and freedom isn't free stickers.
And of course the people who join up to kill for the corporations and come back legless, armless, or brainless.
Stupid
Correction. The US has killed more than 10 million people since WWII.
Tom, thanks forbthe correction. Adding in the Indians, Slaves and all other before WW 2, where do you think that number stands?
I can name 3000 from the towers. We can add the soldiers that died for the corporations. And the banks.
Don't forget they fund both sides of all conflicts.
Well said. Thank you Joecool9. The vast majority of us grew up fooled and conned by the lies of our government and churches ; but, certainly not all of us remain blind and dumb to truth today. Live by the higher law / higher light, that is in all of us. This is our only hope - to turn the tide of hated and madness with our love and compassion for eachother in spite of the lies.
David,
Yesterday our local paper had a front page report about "the toll the telecommuting to war" takes on the pilots of the drones. Psychologically crews are in the middle of the combat as they sit in their seats in another continent monitoring their video screens". If only these troops would understand that they are being betrayed by the MIC. "..they scan for enemy ambushers and roadside bombs while monitoring what the military calls "patterns of life".. It Can be very boring. It can also be gut-wrenching." I greatly admire the Afghan Voices For Peace and hope they have success soon. I wish we could get them together with the drone crews for a chat. See who experiences more gut-wrenching stress.
Someday, the 99% of the nations of the world will figure out that the conflicts are not between themselves, but between the 1% elites of the nations. We're going to stop allowing the loudest and shrillest voices to dominate the dialogue. We're going to refuse to pay for and fight in their wars.
This piece is written in a typical emotionally slanted and unscientific pattern that has been well established in liberal anti war media. The message is that countries like Afghanistan would be war free if it were not for the evil empire of American bringing war to them like war is an American disease and America spreads it. This is ridiculous and not true. The idea that these young men may be encouraged to believe their struggle is as simple as American being out of Afghanistan and that is the key that will bring peace to the country is like me believing that by being in Afghanistan my country will automatically find peace for themselves. War as a reality is as big as the globe it has flourished upon through the hands of the men of all cultures each in turn conquering and ruling one another in bloody battles that continue to this day. Battles that are fought today amongst those still trailing behind in their development are fought for religious ideals. The fact more developed nations are able to capitalize and exploit this sectarian foolishness on one hand while we act the intervening nation on the other hand there to discourage it's continuation so democracy and freedom may prevail is telling for all who wish to pay attention. Especially the countries that are weakened by those inner conflicts over religious beliefs land rights based on edicts of gods and which one will rule the day.
And by the goodness of our beings and collective goodwill, we will change the hearts of the 1% and peace and justice will reign.
pshaw!
I am going to put something in the wrong thread - only because I can't put it in the correct thread. (fill in the blanks with any expletives of your choice)
What the .... is up with the ...... Twitter feed frame on the Dick Cheney article? Who the ... thought that was a good idea? What, you didn't want comments? You would rather have the tenuous, stupidly short, never lasting Twitter junk?
Please put up a comments section. Get rid of the twit.
Thanks for posting that. It seemed strange to me, too. Leave twitter for tim tebow and other sports heroes to dispense wisdom.
Quite right.
They obviously pre-emptively struck the comments section because they correctly guessed that the report would generate appropriately impolite and "uncivil" comments.
But substituting a Twitter feed is weirdly grotesque.