EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A Recipe for Fascism
American politics, as the midterm elections demonstrated, have descended into the irrational. On one side stands a corrupt liberal class, bereft of ideas and unable to respond coherently to the collapse of the global economy, the dismantling of our manufacturing sector and the deadly assault on the ecosystem. On the other side stands a mass of increasingly bitter people whose alienation, desperation and rage fuel emotionally driven and incoherent political agendas. It is a recipe for fascism.
More than half of those identified in a poll by the Republican-leaning Rasmussen Reports as "mainstream Americans" now view the tea party favorably. The other half, still grounded in a reality-based world, is passive and apathetic. The liberal class wastes its energy imploring Barack Obama and the Democrats to promote sane measures including job creation programs, regulation as well as criminal proceedings against the financial industry, and an end to our permanent war economy. Those who view the tea party favorably want to tear the governmental edifice down, with the odd exception of the military and the security state, accelerating our plunge into a nation of masters and serfs. The corporate state, unchallenged, continues to turn everything, including human beings and the natural world, into commodities to exploit until exhaustion or collapse.
All sides of the political equation are lackeys for Wall Street. They sanction, through continued deregulation, massive corporate profits and the obscene compensation and bonuses for corporate managers. Most of that money-hundreds of billions of dollars-is funneled upward from the U.S. Treasury. The Sarah Palins and the Glenn Becks use hatred as a mobilizing passion to get the masses, fearful and angry, to call for their own enslavement as well as to deny uncomfortable truths, including global warming. Our dispossessed working class and beleaguered middle class are vulnerable to this manipulation because they can no longer bear the chaos and uncertainty that come with impoverishment, hopelessness and loss of control. They have retreated into a world of illusion, one peddled by right-wing demagogues, which offers a reassuring emotional consistency. This consistency appears to protect them from the turmoil in which they have been forced to live. The propaganda of a Palin or a Beck may insult common sense, but, for a growing number of Americans, common sense has lost its validity.
The liberal class, which remains rooted in a world of fact, rationalizes placating corporate power as the only practical response. It understands the systems of corporate power. It knows the limitations and parameters. And it works within them. The result, however, is the same. The entire spectrum of the political landscape collaborates in the strangulation of our disenfranchised working class, the eroding of state power, the criminal activity of the financial class and the paralysis of our political process.
Commerce cannot be the sole guide of human behavior. This utopian fantasy, embraced by the tea party as well as the liberal elite, defies 3,000 years of economic history. It is a chimera. This ideology has been used to justify the disempowerment of the working class, destroy our manufacturing capacity, and ruthlessly gut social programs that once protected and educated the working and middle class. It has obliterated the traditional liberal notion that societies should be configured around the common good. All social and cultural values are now sacrificed before the altar of the marketplace.
The failure to question the utopian assumptions of globalization has left us in an intellectual vacuum. Regulations, which we have dismantled, were the bulwarks that prevented unobstructed brutality and pillaging by the powerful and protected democracy. It was a heavily regulated economy, as well as labor unions and robust liberal institutions, which made the American working class the envy of the industrialized world. And it was the loss of those unions, along with a failure to protect our manufacturing, which transformed this working class into a permanent underclass clinging to part-time or poorly paid jobs without protection or benefits.
The "inevitability" of globalization has permitted huge pockets of the country to be abandoned economically. It has left tens of millions of Americans in economic ruin. Private charity is now supposed to feed and house the newly minted poor, a job that once, the old liberal class argued, belonged to the government. As John Ralston Saul in "The Collapse of Globalization" points out, "the role of charity should be to fill the cracks of society, the imaginative edges, to go where the public good hasn't yet focused or can't. Dealing with poverty is the basic responsibility of the state." But the state no longer has the interest or the resources to protect us. And the next target slated for elimination is Social Security.
That human society has an ethical foundation that must be maintained by citizens and the state is an anathema to utopian ideologues of all shades. They always demand that we sacrifice human beings for a distant goal. The propagandists of globalization-from Lawrence Summers to Francis Fukuyama to Thomas Friedman-do for globalization and the free market what Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky did for Marxism. They sell us a dream. These elite interpreters of globalism are the vanguard, the elect, the prophets, who alone grasp a great absolute truth and have the right to impose this truth on a captive people no matter what the cost. Human suffering is dismissed as the price to be paid for the coming paradise. The response of these propagandists to the death rattles around them is to continue to speak in globalization's empty rhetoric and use state resources to service a dead system. They lack the vision to offer any alternative. They can function only as systems managers. They will hollow out the state to sustain a casino capitalism that is doomed to fail. And what they offer as a solution is as irrational as the visions of a Christian America harbored by many within the tea party.
We are ruled by huge corporate monopolies that replicate the political and economic power, on a vastly expanded scale, of the old trading companies of the 17th and 18th centuries. Wal-Mart's gross annual revenues of $250 billion are greater than those of most small nation-states. The political theater funded by the corporate state is composed of hypocritical and impotent liberals, the traditional moneyed elite, and a disenfranchised and angry underclass that is being encouraged to lash out at the bankrupt liberal institutions and the government that once protected them. The tea party rabble, to placate their anger, will also be encouraged by their puppet masters to attack helpless minorities, from immigrants to Muslims to homosexuals. All these political courtiers, however, serve the interests of the corporate state and the utopian ideology of globalism. Our social and political ethic can be summed up in the mantra let the market decide. Greed is good.
The old left-the Wobblies, the Congress of Industrial Workers (CIO), the Socialist and Communist parties, the fiercely independent publications such as Appeal to Reason and The Masses-would have known what to do with the rage of our dispossessed. It used anger at injustice, corporate greed and state repression to mobilize Americans to terrify the power elite on the eve of World War I. This was the time when socialism was not a dirty word in America but a promise embraced by millions who hoped to create a world where everyone would have a chance. The steady destruction of the movements of the left was carefully orchestrated. They fell victim to a mixture of sophisticated forms of government and corporate propaganda, especially during the witch hunts for communists, and overt repression. Their disappearance means we lack the vocabulary of class warfare and the militant organizations, including an independent press, with which to fight back.
We believe, like the Spaniards in the 16th century who pillaged Latin America for gold and silver, that money, usually the product of making and trading goods, is real. The Spanish empire, once the money ran out and it no longer produced anything worth buying, went up in smoke. Today's use in the United States of some $12 trillion in government funds to refinance our class of speculators is a similar form of self-deception. Money markets are still treated, despite the collapse of the global economy, as a legitimate source of trade and wealth creation. The destructive power of financial bubbles, as well as the danger of an unchecked elite, was discovered in ancient Athens and detailed more than a century ago in Emile Zola's novel "Money." But we seem determined to find out this self-destructive force for ourselves. And when the second collapse comes, as come it must, we will revisit wrenching economic and political tragedies forgotten in the mists of history.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


338 Comments so far
Show AllThanks for posting the indispensable Chris Hedges again, Common Dreams.
Tony Vodvarka
WAKE UP, CD!
Chris Hedges most recent book......is his most explosive and prescient!: The Death of the Liberal Class!........and he is most convincing in proving it! Recognize Anyone you might know?
I'm reading it right now. So far it's an outstanding book.
The last few Hedges interviews and posts I have seen have been his best. Thank you Chris Hedges.
Mr. hedges, your first paragraph was all that you needed to make your point.
in the following paragraphs, you fall for the same trap of wanting to sound "balanced", the same trap jon stewart has been in, by equating fukuyama with lenin.
if capitalism is a dream, and marxism is also the same kind of dream,
what do you have to offer?
if you got nothing to offer as alternative to the status quo, which is the end stage of the global financial capitalism,
what makes you any better than any other "liberal class" hacks who are "bereft of ideas"?
but most of all, what do you mean by "Marxism / communism is a dream"?
Curiousteve for planetary emperor. hurry to take a number to kiss steve's ass, before the line gets too long and there's too much lipstick or something else built up.
--Trylon
at least i don't bullshit around like you do.
like yours.
that one was honest. the one above is BS that adds nothing to the discussion.
It's best if you don't make things about your ego.
On your earlier point, his article clearly does embrace socialist ideas and equaling institutions of both state and citizenry. But even if it didn't, there is nothing wrong with illuminating a problem elegantly and articulately as Hedges always does for us.
What a lame response.
One might disagree with steves post by actually referencing that with which you differ. Unfortunate that you chose a less productive course.
Well for one thing, he knows where the Shift key is.
You don't have to set yourself up immediately in opposition to a writer's views. Why don't you live up to your sobriquet and do a little homework and wikipedia (it's so easy) "Marxism" or "communism" and see where they failed? It's so easy.
And I say again, it is not the job of a writer to propose solutions - unless that's the subject of his piece. If you've read any Hedges, you'll see that, most of the time, he focuses his pieces on describing the problems and injustices of the current system, and sounding the alarm.
Perhaps the solutions are up to you.
what his solution is NOT is clearly suggested in his equation of "fukuyama = lenin."
he rails against the "liberal class ... bereft of ideas" though they are the "rational" ones, according to himself.
i'm only asking him to answer his own question.
hedges is not as good as you guys fathom him to be.
He's better than you.
Steve please try to see what Chris is saying is that any type of ideology whether marxist, capitalistic/fascist, theological/religious, or hip-hop/rapping (if there is such a thing), all try and force the complex and multifaceted attributes of humans and force them in a simplistic and static straight jacket. It's like pounding a square peg in a round hole. You may eventually get it in but it causes tremendous damage (frustration, pain and suffering, and often times death.... Look at Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Popes, potentates, and other ridged characters).
Humans as individuals and society as a group are complex and defy easy classifications of ridged ideals. Society must reflect some degree of homogenization and heterogeneity at the same time.
Personally I believe a well informed social democracy is the best system but it must be constantly cultivated like a good organic garden other wise the weeds and tares dominate and we all (society) faces starvation.
"Well for one thing, he knows where the Shift key is."
Ka-ching! Good one.
"it is not the job of a writer to propose solutions"--redballoon
~
true, but the first step in finding a solution is EDUCATION and we've got a whole lot of ignorance to wade through.
as long as we the people play follow the leader, democracy doesn't not exist.
Astonishing that Hedges falls on deaf ears for the bougeoisie class of elites like this. Hedges has in fact offered alternatives in just about everything he writes. Starting with a call to get active and start building third parties, but more importantly he accurately critiques our contemporary cultural and political situation which stands as a prophetic witness against the corporate takeover of the duopoly. Hedges call, while relevant means nothing if people such as yourself continues to drink from the same polluted trough of the duopoly and remains impotent to personal activism.
More importantly Hedges critique arises from and engages the socio-historical moment with an accurate analysis of the machinations of power by offering a critique of his own circumstances as a voice from the economic and social margins while spending twenty plus years as a war journalist risking his own life on the front lines. In this regard, Hedges offers two methods of analysis; the first being what he refers to the disempowered liberal class: thus he characterizes the Liberal Class as a group of functionalists, those which seeks to maintain social norms and balance along with continuity of the status quo perhaps working for incremental change but finding absolutely no solidarity with its left wing; and the second is the dialectical approach which stresses the notion of struggle and conflict, and sees society fraught with contradictions that need to be transformed. Arising out of the Marxist critique, the dialectical model is more engaged and activist in scope and praxis; seeking to rock the boat of entrenched elites grown too comfortable with their personal privilege and assimulation into corporate hegemony.
In other words, if you are white, the system works fairly well giving you your prescription drugs, two year turnover on your SUV, and cushy corporate job; but for marginal populations of the poor who have to struggle every day to make a living, things are not so nice.
Wake up.
you have a serious comprehension problem. not worth even responding.
Typical for Galactic Stupidity to make proclamations about not making proclamations.
Curiously, from your posts it seems you are the one with difficulty comprehending just how corrupt the system is, and how useless it is to work within it in an attempt to change it.
The US Empire is in terminal collapse.
At this point, the only sane effort is to get out of the path of the dying behemoth.
Non Serviam - I will not serve.
So why did you?
...and you wonder why you attract the semi literate invectives?
Elegant and beautifully on target! By which I'm referring to Ekobe's comments.
There are those who have been active for decades while most Liberal's have cashed in. We have suffered the loss of jobs, careers, homes, and friends because so few stood behind us. Most everyone cowered under the pressure of job loss. There are those of us who have been abandoned and have little remaining to give except words. So let's clarify something. Liberals still with something to lose need to stand up! We will no longer be your road kill.
I think you're misconstruing what Hedges says. A careful reading of the next to last paragraph of his article will answer all your questions.
care to answer my questions then, since i don't see them in his writing and you seem to?
I'll try to answer the question you had.
It seems to me that Hedges wasn't saying that Marxism offered nothing but a utopian dream but rather was saying that Lenin's and Trotsky's interpretation(s) of Marxism relied on the same kind of debased logic as the neoliberals use in promoting a "free" trade global agenda. Whether that's true or not is quite debatable, I think, but to me it didn't read as an absolute condemnation of Marxism, especially in light of the second to last paragraph (as was referred to previously) in which the author yearns for an organized Left that can provide a framework in which the top-down class warfare of the neoliberals can be clearly seen. Hedges' argument seems to be with the notion of a "vanguard" regardless of political stripe, whether neoliberal or Leninist.
Ultimately I think that the passage you referred to was poorly stated and entirely unnecessary in the piece, but not enough to truly blur the point the author was making.
RIGHT ON KITAJ
KEEP ON keeping on........
The "Vanguard" of which you speak is inherent to Marxism, however, and inevitably plants the seeds of its own destruction, as Kronstadt is a perfect testament to.
Marx should be studied like Freud, a pioneer in his field that set in motion many others who saw the flaws in his ideology and improved the thinking to compensate for those flaws going well beyond the original pioneer.
Emma Goldman, for instance, originally believed in Marx's dream to the point she immigrated to the Soviet Union. Upon discovering the reality, however, she then left.
Marx really was not the first, however. Josiah Warren, Benjamin Tucker, Lysander Spooner, etc were dealing with the same issues before Marx, and doing so in the English language, and doing so in a manner that did not require a "Vanguard" that inevitably becomes the New Boss, same as the Old Boss.
I think perhaps you've confused Marx with Lenin.
I am presently reading his book and I agree with what you said here.
Also - and you may well disagree with me, most here do - Hedges fails to stand up for the fact that it is christianity as a whole - not just the extreme right-wing version - that has disempowered people and made them into such passive brainwashed idiots. The whole damed story - that one lone jew who walked the sands of Palastine 2000 years ago is the ONLY person capapble of direct God-Realization is the Biggest Lie of history. Nor does he go after this ridiculous, magical thinking that he died for your sins and that all you need to do is believe this and you will be "saved" - what utter crap.
Hedges doesnt understand the 1960s at all and denigrates things he doesnt fully understand. THE great message of the 60's was that ANYONE can directly Realize God and explore the highest levels of human genius. Hedges, committed to his bullsh** exoteric religion of mere belief, refuses to openly stand up and state the truth that exoteric religion is nothing more than the "opiate of the masses" and that God-Realization, or Enlightenment - in the Eastern sense of that word - represents true human maturity, and that without it, human beings remain in a larval, immature, psychopathological state of adaptation to existence, and until humanity has the guts to face this and look at itself in the mirror, there will never be any real, positive change. Never.
In other words, revolution is BOTH political AND psychological, or psycho-spiritual. And for Hedges to denigrate - like he does in his book - all those who committed their lives to understanding the Enlightenment process is simply disgusting.
"Yes Chris, we advocate that human beings arise from their dumbed-down, childish, brainwashed state and Realize their true Self, not "self" with a small s, the seperate ego-persona, but Self with a capital "S", that is identical to God or the infinite Absolute Source of Light, Life, Love, Genius, Knowledge, etc.etc. That you dont know the difference reveals you as part of the problem, not the solution.
As John Lenno said, "you better free your mind instead" - so free your mind from the Big Lie of christianity, and if you cant, you are just another brainwashed person with no solutions."
As I said, I expect most everyone here to disagree with me as ususal but I dont care. Hedges is getting an email from me - I am sick and tired of the 1960's being misrepresented by people who cant see the bigger picture.
I don't disagree with you, except that I wouldn't be quite so harsh on Hedges. Despite the shortcomings, his willingness to at least tell some of the Truth to those willing to read/listen, is an important step.
My only suggestion is that you include the close examination and elimination of ALL of the major Abrahamic religions (and maybe others), as they all are myths that keep myriad humans from exploring their real psycho-spiritual 'beings'.
Nicely put. Exploration of one's psycho-spiritual nature
requires a tremendous amount of passion and commitment
to discover the truth within oneself. As it is most people
are too conditioned by the dominant culture to which they are
born into to ever truly break away from its dominance and the parasitic
and predatory relationships they engender.
I agree with your suggestion. As to my being harsh on Chris, it is because of his know-it-all denigrating and very limited attitude toward the 1960's - as per his book - that got him that response. I wrote him an email and added to what I wrote above:
Despite your divinity degree chris, you dont understand the difference between exoteric religion - belief without evidence - and esoteric spirituality - direct experience/Realization, and so you fail to understand the situation on this planet. Spiritual evolution is THE mature purpose of human existence, and without it, human beings degenerate into searching for adolescent ego-fulfillment: greed, power, money lust, etc.
Also, exoteric religion is nothing more than a socio-political control system to keep spiritually unevolved people in line, and/or used by the elites to keep people in brainwashed subservience.
However, as per Dostoevsky's "Grand Inquisitor" , perhaps people really want to be slaves who are told what to do because they dont want to take responsibility for their own spiritual evolution.
Yes, we know that the reduction of human life to economics and technology is disastrous; what you dont go on to say is that human beings commit themselves to such an adaptation BECAUSE they have completely lost touch with true spirituality.
The 1960's, chris, were a Spiritual Planetary Renaissance Wave that got dampened, unfortunately. I suggest you go back and listen to Harrison's "Within You, Without You" and the Moody Blues, and then you might understand that psychedelic rock poets were writing in the same vein as the Transcendentalists. How is it so many like you cannot see this?
Some people chose a Consciousness Revolution because they saw and see it as the only way to change human culture. That doesnt exclude the political, or even the revolutionary. Stop denigrating those of us who chose to try to advance human spiritual evolution in whatever ways were open to us personally. To do so makes you vulgar and crass. Harrison's song mentioned above brought more spiritual light to earth than your entire life times 10!
Stop perpetuating all these false narratives about the 60's. Humanity is completely spiritually degenerate, we were ALL born into that degeneracy, and it is very difficult to break free, so where do you get off criticizing Timothy Leary and others like Aldous Huxley - who recruited Leary - and others who saw a crippled species and tried to find the way out? What have YOU done to advance human spiritual evolution?
My parents were WW2 generation - my father was actually older - and they and their generation were some of the most brainwashed people in the history of the planet. THEY are the ones who forced The System down everyone’s throat who tried to break free, along with the right-wing working class christians who have destroyed democratic solidarity since the Nixon days where they - as true teaparty progenitors - were beating up anti-war protestors..
As for SDS, see the documentary. They were people who lost it because they couldnt bear to let the Vietnam war go on, so if you are going to demonize them, then demonize Joe Stack too. Better yet, try to understand how people get pushed to extremes from a "there but for the grace of God go I" attitude, instead of sneering judgments from your journalistic ivory tower. I could go on but why bother. Warm regards.
P.S. Wilhelm Reich, who integrated Freud and Marx, wrote about why communism failed. It is because human beings are too psychologically sick to create a harmonious common world. He called this sickness, "The Emotional Plague." Western man was sick long before capitalism, thanks to christianity. Too bad you don’t have the guts to admit it because it leaves you without any solutions.
Kitaj,
i'm on a public computer so i have limited time to respond, but i wanted to say that i agree w/ your criticism, and your honesty...
"Some people chose a Consciousness Revolution because they saw and see it as the only way to change human culture. That doesn't exclude the political, or even the revolutionary."
they are not mutually exclusive and in fact feed off of each other, therefore those who consciously strive to explore their humanity in a deeper sense (questioning) often are those people who are actively promoting positive social change in their communities.
but... there are people who are on 'spiritual' trips that do not take the time to engage in community or try to improve the lot of their neighbor. i believe this is called false consciousness which is created by narcissistic illusions of grandeur.
personally, i have a very difficult time w/ the judeo/christian/muslim interpretation of reality. i often call myself an atheist or an agnostic b/c it's just too challenging to try and explain what spirituality means to me - or to others (just my own hang up here).
anyway... from one primate to another...thank you for injecting this neglected line of discourse into the conversation.
...peace...
Kitja- I am not sure how old Hedges is. If he missed the 60's and early 70's because of Divinity School or not.
But Wow, how lucky he was to transcend his Christian belief system in favor of acts that are actually like Christ in the first 3 chapters.
Hedges is risking his life speaking truth to power. George Harrison died a Rich semi reclusive man on Maui. And many stars other great rock Artists grew old and did the same.
Many of us 'Got Over Done' with to many drugs to carry on the good fight. That was used against us and managed to keep many of us silent for the fear of arrest.
The irony washed over us. Few great Spiritual Masters used Drugs time and time again to see the light of 'God is Love'. But LSD and Peyote sure helped.
After that it is up to the momentary enlightened mind to turn his experience into a lasting one without the chemical kick.
I look forward to reading Hedges latest book. And Yes the 60's were great, but they went out with a whimper didn't they?
Arguably, the 60's revolution became the New Age movement of today, and has diverged into many different flavors, most of which still glorify ego. They neither lead to evolution nor enlightenment. Self-centered thrill seekers using drugs did not wind up creating a more awakened world than their parents. That said, a few jewels, like J. Krishnamurti, Vernon Howard and others seemed to have awakened. False Guru's like the Bhagwan (Osho), and Carlos Castaneda made a splash, but turned out to be charlatans and/or hoaxers. Even so, they brought some important ideas to forefront. I mostly agree what you say about 'exoteric' religion, but think there are as many imitations of esoteric religion, where there is a lot of imaginary enlightenment (see self-delusion in a more subtle form).
The Mayans based their 260 day calendar on the human gestation time period. Their spiritual gestation period is 26,000 years. The Spiritual gestation of 26,000 years both ends and begins on December 21, 2012. This date marks a human opportunity for spiritual transformation and advancement. Spiritual people will transform to an elevated form of spirituality heretofore unknown to humans. A time of purification enabling an opening of and unity of minds is underway. Even though Christianity is directly responsible for the genocide of over one hundred million of our peoples, I prefer to respect each person's path, including theirs. I trust creation in it's wisdom to elevate or demote, I need not judge.
Interesting. Christianity is a branch of a a pattern of thought and behavior that began with authoritarian/agrarian societies and has continued to evolve into a myth of progress.
Being temporal in nature, it ignores the present, experiential. Narratives become constructed, enclosing us in patterns of thought and behavior antithetic to reality and continued survival with in it.
Evolution, while seemingly a narrative, exists in the present. One must continue to do so, else die.
Oh well.
"- that one lone jew who walked the sands of Palastine 2000 years ago is the ONLY person capapble of direct God-Realization is the Biggest Lie of history. Nor does he go after this ridiculous, magical thinking that he died for your sins and that all you need to do is believe this and you will be "saved" - what utter crap."
To be sure, what you are describing is only Protestant Christianity - specifically the Puritan sects that fled England and colonized the US.
Catholics, along with Anglicans, tend to emphasize the importance of what you do, not what you believe. And this stuff about being "saved" is quite foreign to Catholics.
And then there are the Gnostics (and Coptics as well, from what I understand, that are very much esoteric (rather than exoteric), so to dismiss all "Christian" or "Abrahamic" traditions seems to be misplacing some anger.
LSD25 for the most part informed the 60s. Self realization imbued the various social, freedom and anti-war movements. There was a brief opening to the Transcendental enmasse which was the juice of those times. We are in the age of intellect exemplified by computers. Fascinating, informing, but where's the juice?
Kitaj alluding to Enlightenment as component to social action reminds me of the Bodhisattva vow, "I will not accept my own enlightenment until all others are enlightened and I realize there are no others". hehe...I agree with Kitaj, the hippies were right, and anything less than "I Alone Am inexplicably masguerading as all that is" is superstious delusion.
There's lots of words these days, but not much space. In the sixties there was more space and less words. Inspiration came out of that space which informed the action. Meditation creates space, so does 500 mics of clean LSD25. Just saying...
You're right, too many words, false religions and philosophies. How does one discern? Hint: belief is the sister of self-deception. Anyone can believe anything, so if something cannot be verified, it is virtually useless and, psychologically speaking, even harmful or dangerous; wars are/have been fought over different beliefs and ideologies. No, I am not atheist. Insight is another means of validation, though an externally unprovable one. The 'proof' is in the transformation and insight of the conscious individual, but not everyone will recognize it as such (those with eyes to see...and all that).
While LSD25 (generally the dose is 100-300 mcg, is it not?) is fun and thrilling, it will not bring an awakening, and can even be dangerous to some--showing them what they might not be ready to see. That said, I do admire Richard Alpert for his persistence and sincerity.
The hippies were right to rebel against a corrupt society, but the did it with incomplete understanding, or so it seems. They wanted to party and 'get off' more than they wanted inner knowledge. Doing the opposite of what their stodgy parents considered immoral, did not make them 'moral' by comparison. And the drugs took a toll on some of their most beloved icons: Hendrix, Joplin, and maybe Morrison.
Further, once they faced the demands of the real world (i.e., earning a living, raising children, etc.), they returned to world of fear and all that goes along with it; they became the new democrats and republicans; they created their own brand of greed and corruption, and embraced the very materialism they once railed against--again with few notable exceptions). So, please, lets not idolize the 60's.
Civil rights, gender rights, animal rights, consumer protections, food ingrediant labels, food body relationship, alternative medicine, pyschological processes and introspection, spiritual processes and introspection, nature apreciation and preservation, experimenting with and valuing community, alternative whole food companies, alternative wholistic medicine and products, a general sensitivity to our inner processes and thus to each other, enviromental sensitivities, etc, etc, etc. These movements have been integrated into our society and taken for granted now. There was an opening inthe 60s which took people out of their heads and put them in their bodies. A light was turned on and we got to see the lay of the land. It is up to each one of us to walk according to what we've been shown. Content without context is nihilistic confusion no matter how erudite the content. A little slowing down, a little introspection, the way appears. The introspection was gifted to us in the sixties, now we have to do it for ourselves.
Wei Wu Wei, good summation of many of the 60's gifts in which became foundations for the growth we see in these areas today.
Fairly quickly the 60's was co-opted by consumerism with the 60's look becoming just another fashion change; and the late comers to the movement who where primarily followers and hedonistic at their core. I think the beginning of the end was at the fee Rolling Stones concert at Altamount where the hells angels killed a guy. There was a rather quick end to the rock festivals in about 1971 with everything imploding. Oh, but they where really something to experience for the brief years they flourished (approximately 66-71). God it was like being on another planet but 90% was fueled by psychedelics and when those drugs started to lose their magic and glitter (primarily from over use), then the darker drugs came in with their deep shadows that shrouded the hippy soul and blackened the movement as a whole.
The true believers went underground and by this I mean inside looking for the spiritual spark that they experienced through the "back door of spirituality" of psychedelic drugs. This process morphed out into what WWW mentions above. I'm still a vegetarian because meat seemed to be alive on my fork when I ate it on acid. The damn stuff almost talked to me. The final moment was when I went to a barbecue in Vail the summer of 68 (I worked there on the ski patrol in the winter) and this steer was going round and round on a huge spit and the crazy part is the thing still looked alive to me on acid. Must have been it's spirt still hanging around the carcass. Whatever, meat, or anything with eyes (except a potato) has never passed my lips again.
Before long we where into the yuppy years of uber materialism and then Ronald Raygun with his Death Valley Days sales pitch for the Randians and a lot of people, educated and blue collar stuck their fork into it. The behind the curtain guys who where pitching the new populist conservatism never forgave the hippies for what they perceived as lack of external moral restraint and, and this is the big one, preventing (in their eyes) the greatest country on earth from winning the Viet Nam war. With such a convenient scapegoat it wasn't long before they where doubling down on their bets in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and with the new repub house, probably Iran. God safe us from the karma but god's law is karma so what can he do.
Better keep the passport up to date and a small pile of gold sovereigns handy, cause the times they are a'chang'n!
Kitaj,I'm sure, as you see it, your view of the 60s has merit.My head is somewhere far different. Hedges historical outlook in this book is far wider than the 60s. In attempting to prove his thesis: The Death of the Middle Class, he continually makes the same point over and over again in many chapters: THAT
Liberals gradually over time more and more have come to support and enable the Corporatocracy, feeling financially comfortable, socially secure and intellectually recognized within its ever expanding circle of might and power, AND at the same time, Liberals have done everything in their power to marginalize, attack, and try to destroy RADICALS on their Left, who dare venture outside the guidelines of REFORM acceptability proscribed by the ruling superwealthy corporatist class.
He gives many examples of courageously moral human beings who swam against the tide of Liberal disapproval,i.e., radicals, including himself, with his reporting at The Times, what happened when he gave a commencement speech of "unacceptable truthfullness" in 2003, etc.
What is undeniable are the passions raised by readers about his points of view!
"but most of all, what do you mean by "Marxism / communism is a dream"?"
He meant to say nightmare, really.
"but most of all, what do you mean by "Marxism / communism is a dream"?"
He meant to say nightmare, really