Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Socialism? The Rich Are Winning the US Class War: Facts Show Rich Getting Richer, Everyone Else Poorer
The rich and their paid false prophets are doing a bang up job deceiving the poor and middle class. They have convinced many that an evil socialism is alive in the land and it is taking their fair share. But the deception cannot last – facts say otherwise.
Yes, there is a class war – the war of the rich on the poor and the middle class – and the rich are winning. That war has been going on for years. Look at the facts – facts the rich and their false paid prophets do not want people to know.
Let Glen Beck go on about socialists descending on Washington. Allow Rush Limbaugh to rail about “class warfare for a leftist agenda that will destroy our society.” They are well compensated false prophets for the rich.
The truth is that for the several decades the rich in the US have been getting richer and the poor and middle class have been getting poorer. Look at the facts then make up your own mind.
Poor Getting Poorer: Facts
The official US poverty numbers show we now have the highest number of poor people in 51 years. The official US poverty rate is 14.3 percent or 43.6 million people in poverty. One in five children in the US is poor; one in ten senior citizens is poor. Source: US Census Bureau.
One of every six workers, 26.8 million people, is unemployed or underemployed. This “real” unemployment rate is over 17%. There are 14.8 million people designated as “officially” unemployed by the government, a rate of 9.6 percent. Unemployment is worse for African American workers of whom 16.1 percent are unemployed. Another 9.5 million people who are working only part-time while they are seeking full-time work but have had their hours cut back or are so far only able to find work part-time are not counted in the official unemployment numbers. Also, an additional 2.5 million are reported unemployed but not counted because they are classified as discouraged workers in part because they have been out of work for more than 12 months. Source: US Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics October 2010 report.
The median household income for whites in the US is $51,861; for Asians it is $65,469; for African Americans it is $32,584; for Latinos it is $38,039. Source: US Census Bureau.
Fifty million people in the US lack health insurance. Source: US Census Bureau.
Women in the US have a greater lifetime risk of dying from pregnancy-related conditions than women in 40 other countries. African American US women are nearly 4 times more likely to die of pregnancy-related complications than white women. Source: Amnesty International Maternal Health Care Crisis in the USA.
About 3.5 million people, about one-third of which are children, are homeless at some point in the year in the US. Source: National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty.
Outside Atlanta, 33,000 people showed up to seek applications for low cost subsidized housing in August 2010. When Detroit offered emergency utility and housing assistance to help people facing evictions, more than 50,000 people showed up for the 3,000 vouchers. Source: News reports.
There are 49 million people in the US who live in households which eat only because they receive food stamps, visit food pantries or soup kitchens for help. Sixteen million are so poor they have skipped meals or foregone food at some point in the last year. This is the highest level since statistics have been kept. Source: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Middle Class Going Backward: Facts
One or two generations ago it was possible for a middle class family to live on one income. Now it takes two incomes to try to enjoy the same quality of life. Wages have not kept up with inflation; adjusted for inflation they have lost ground over the past ten years. The cost of housing, education and health care have all increased at a much higher rate than wages and salaries. In 1967, the middle 60 percent of households received over 52% of all income. In 1998, it was down to 47%. The share going to the poor has also fallen, with the top 20% seeing their share rise. Mark Trumball, “Obama’s challenge: reversing a decade of middle-class decline,” Christian Science Monitor, January 25, 2010. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0125/Obama-s-challenge-reversing-a-dec...
A record 2.8 million homes received a foreclosure notice in 2009, higher than both 2008 and 2007. In 2010, the rate is expected to be rise to 3 million homes. Sources: Reuters and RealtyTrac.
Eleven million homeowners (about one in four homeowners) in the US are “under water” or owe more on their mortgages than their house is worth. Source: “Home truths,” The Economist, October 23, 2010.
For the first time since the 1940s, the real incomes of middle-class families are lower at the end of the business cycle of the 2000s than they were at the beginning. Despite the fact that the American workforce is working harder and smarter than ever, they are sharing less and less in the benefits they are creating. This is true for white families but even truer for African American families whose gains in the 1990s have mostly been eliminated since then. Source: Jared Bernstein and Heidi Shierholz, State of Working America. http://www.stateofworkingamerica.org/swa08_00_execsum.pdf
Rich Getting Richer: Facts
The wealth of the richest 400 people in the US grew by 8% in the last year to $1.37 trillion. Source: Forbes 400: The super-rich get richer, September 22, 2010, Money.com
The top Hedge Fund Manager of 2009, David Tepper, “earned” $4 billion last year. The rest of the top ten earned: $3.3 billion, $2.5 billion, $2.3 billion, $1.4 billion, $1.3 billion (tie for 6th and 7th place), $900 million (tie for 8th and 9th place), and in last place out of the top ten, $825 million. Source: Business Insider. “Meet the top 10 earning hedge fund managers of 2009.” http://www.businessinsider.com/meet-the-top-10-earning-hedge-fund-managers-of-2009-2010-4
Income disparity in the US is now as bad as it was right before the Great Depression at the end of the 1920s. From 1979 to 2006, the richest 1% more than doubled their share of the total US income, from 10% to 23%. The richest 1% have an average annual income of more than $1.3 million. For the last 25 years, over 90% of the total growth in income in the US went to the top 10% earners – leaving 9% of all income to be shared by the bottom 90%. Source: Jared Bernstein and Heidi Shierholz, State of Working America. http://www.stateofworkingamerica.org/tabfig/2008/01/19.pdf
In 1973, the average US CEO was paid $27 for every dollar paid to a typical worker; by 2007 that ratio had grown to $275 to $1. Source: Jared Bernstein and Heidi Shierholz, State of Working America. http://www.stateofworkingamerica.org/tabfig/2008/03/SWA08_Wages_Figure.3AE.pdf
Since 1992, the average tax rate on the richest 400 taxpayers in the US dropped from 26.8% to 16.62%. Source: US Internal Revenue Service. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/07intop400.pdf
The US has the greatest inequality between rich and poor among all Western industrialized nations and it has been getting worse for 40 years. The World Factbook, published by the CIA, includes an international ranking of the inequality among families inside of each country, called the Gini Index. The US ranking of 45 in 2007 is the same as Argentina, Cameroon, and Cote d’Ivorie. The highest inequality can be found in countries like Namibia, South Africa, Haiti and Guatemala. The US ranking of 45 compares poorly to Japan (38), India (36), New Zealand, UK (34), Greece (33), Spain (32), Canada (32), France (32), South Korea (31), Netherlands (30), Ireland (30), Australia (30), Germany (27), Norway (25), and Sweden (23). Source: CIA The World Factbook: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2172.html
Rich people live an average of about five years longer than poor people in the US. Naturally, gross inequality has consequences in terms of health, exposure to unhealthy working conditions, nutrition and lifestyle. In 1980, the most well off in the US had a life expectancy of 2.8 years over the least well-off. As the inequality gap widens, so does the life expectancy gap. In 1990, the gap was a little less than 4 years. In 2000, the least well-off could expect to live to age of 74.7 while the most well off had a life expectancy of 79.2 years. Source: Elise Gould, “Growing disparities in life expectancy,” Economic Policy Institute. http://www.epi.org/economic_snapshots/entry/webfeatures_snapshots_20080716/
Conclusion
These are extremely troubling facts for anyone concerned about economic fairness, equality of opportunity, and justice.
Thomas Jefferson once observed that the systematic restructuring of society to benefit the rich over the poor and middle class is a natural appetite of the rich. “Experience declares that man is the only animal which devours his own kind, for I can apply no milder term to…the general prey of the rich on the poor.” But Jefferson also knew that justice can only be delayed so long when he said, “I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever.”
The rich talk about the rise of socialism to divert attention from the fact that they are devouring the basics of the poor and everyone else. Many of those crying socialism the loudest are doing it to enrich or empower themselves. They are right about one thing – there is a class war going on in the US. The rich are winning their class war, and it is time for everyone else to fight back for economic justice.
- Posted in




139 Comments so far
Show AllYes, the mills of God grind slowly, but they grind exceedingly fine.
.
Was it Barbara Bush who said "Let them eat cake?"
Isn't it unAmerican to let FACTS get in the way of good stories ?
A monopolized US mainstream media has repeated the same lies (lets call them good stories) for so many years that those lies have become facts in the minds of most Americans.
The author is an attorney who should know that FACTs don't win legal cases, good stories win legal cases.
How can we assume that Americans will soon wake up and examine the FACTS when most Americans wouldn't recognize a FACT if it walked up and slapped them in the face ?
YES YES YES
facts don't win hearts and minds
We must learn to put the facts into a story that will change , not change, validate, people's experience of living in the USA.
How I see it now is that people know how they and their freinds and family are living but when they try to learn about teh causes they aren't finding any information that validates their experience.
And like most people, they doubt themselves and will give "experts" the benefit of the doubt.
It takes great confidance to believe yourself when the social narrative says you are wrong.
But the day will come when no amount of lies can hide the truth.
The capitalists know this, that's why they are arming up.
"It takes great confidance to believe yourself when the social narrative says you are wrong.
But the day will come when no amount of lies can hide the truth.
The capitalists know this, that's why they are arming up."
Kudos, Morticia - but unless those of us who agree are organized into a disciplined party prepared to destroy the entire capitalist system, we will be slaughtered without mercy
The 'socialism will destroy prosperity' canard is very old. You had people in congress and the senate railing about this 'threat' since 1890. It was ALWAYS used as an excuse to entrench the oligarchs further and protect capitalist fortunes from popular oversight.
Socialism has always been the answer and that's why our media and politicians froth at the mouth everytime the word 'good' is associated with socialism.
Though it was, of course, Marie Antoinette who originally, supposedly, said "Let them eat cake", I do like the parallels you have drawn here. Perhaps we can roll out the ol' guillotine for a few more additions?
Yes; and then the Supreme Court validated it with their decision on Citizens United v FEC.
Excellent article here on the history of corporate personhood: http://www.alternet.org/books/148608/the_supreme_court_sold_out_our_democracy_--_how_to_fight_the_corporate_takeover_of_our_elections/ It's an eye-opener!
Rich Getting Richer, Everyone Else Poorer
isn't that socialism??? uuuuuh, i think i'm a socialist.
- sarah palin
"The rich are the scum of the earth in every country." (G. K. Chesterton, conservative Catholic writer and thinker)
"Behind every great fortune, there is a great crime." (George Bernard Shaw)
"First you must learn how to smile as you kill,
if you want to be like the folks on the hill"
John Lennon - from Working Class Hero
"To be a millionaire you have to do somebody wrong." (Muddy Waters, blues singer, ca. 1967)
"Eat the Rich" - Motorhead.
There are only two kinds of people in the globalist society, investors and slaves. Unfortunately Obama represents the investors and no one represents the slaves. The slaves make the products and the investors make the money. As for socialism, we need a president who will say, “providing for the common defense is a social program so quit whining about the social programs that promote the general welfare”. The Iranian was right, America is a godless land. As long as the creators of wealth are masters of the creators of souls that will be true. I asked God, “how did you let my land get so screwed up”? The only words I heard were, “the Holy Spirit entered into their hearts that they would agree to turn their land over to the beast”. Why do you think God would do such a mean and stupid thing? I see said the blind man.
What does belief in a god have to do with anything?
Precisely. As Napoleon observed, "Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich." Time to ditch religion.
Whoo hoo!! I love this statement.
How about this one, "Humanity won't be happy until the last politician is hanged with the guts of the last priest."
Self-defense is not murder.
Actually, Morticia, I think it has quite a lot to do with acceptance in general.
We live in a nation with freedom of religion. Is there any nation that has freedom FROM religion ?
Ray, you can escape religion by creating a space within yourself where only your personal understanding of divine principles exists, and by reaching a state where that understanding is not adulterated by other people's distortions and false stories and judgments. I hope you yourself have not been hurt spiritually, however...
Whatever your reason for wanting to escape from religion, I applaud your resistance. However, there is a creation myth in all civilizations, that is one aspect of religion that you won't escape from. However, as for a nation with no religion, if you wouldn't mind living with a primitive tribe, you may find some that haven't been corrupted by the major religions, although they would certainly hold their own personal beliefs and version of the story of God and how life on Earth came about.
Good luck.
One Love, Namaste.
If religion makes the deaths of children acceptable then I want nothing of it.
Religion never has challenged the status quo. In fact they have tried to obstruct every advance humanity has made, when advancement is unstoppable they try to take credit for it.
solrev-
America is not a Godless land. God is not lost and has nothing to do with the bullshit rich people are pulling. Nobody is the master of the Creator and Origin of Souls. Why do you think God should stop us from wreaking discord? This is our lesson to learn and advance beyond. Would you stop your toddler from trying to walk, even though he fell occasionally and bumped his noggin a few times? No.
Isn't it time for humans to take responsibility for our behavior and our thoughts and attitudes? Isn't it time that we stop blaming God for the bad things that we humans do? Isn't it time for us to consider that religions at their core have been corrupted by humans, mostly rich humans, for the purpose of controlling other humans, which has nothing whatsoever to do with the true nature or existence of God? God would never do anything mean, and how could God, who is Divine Love and Perfection, ever do anything that could be described as "stupid"?
Humans are just the ones that are stupid, but sleepy would be more the term for it. We are really sleepy, and don't know what to do about our incessant discord. Don't worry, though, we're learning, in little 13,000 year chunks. In another 7,000 years, or so, if we are still living on the Earth by then, we should have it right. So...No worries!
It just so happens that someone "doing gods work" had just stated that the fed NEEDS to print up 4 trillion dollars.
http://blacklistednews.com/Goldman%3A-The-Fed-Needs-To-Print-%244-Trillion-In-New-Money-/11196/0/13/13/Y/M.html
On that note the US has dropped charges against UBS who were sheltering money for the uber rich to avoid taxes.
Interesting news cycle for monday. Watch the banks, not Julian Assange/Wikileaks.
printing up 4 trillion dollars and giving to rich would exacerbate the problem, shrink the economy further
if 4 trillion is printed up and given to regular people and poor people , either by creating jobs or whatever, it would stimulate the economy
printing up 4 trillion dollars is in essence a flat tax, and may be the only way to get corporations and rich people to pay anything
but if the 4 trillion goes the poor and middle class then it stimulates economy
if it goes to the rich and corporations then it shrinks the economy
Fed chairman Ben Bernanke is calling the 4 trillion dollar print job QUANTITATIVE EASING. If one of your Senators who voted in favor of reconfirming Bernanke earlier this year is up for re-election Nov. 2, make sure you vote against that Senator.
In the meantime the Federal Government transfers more responsibilities and the associated costs off to state and local governments in the form of unfunded mandates.
The states are not allowed to print money the way the Feds do so they become bankrupt one by one.
agree about states
unfortunately this money will only go to banks who are not loaning??
it is supposed to give them money to own
but at least they may owe some interest to the government
.......................................................
i'll add one thing
as for unfunded mandates, publics schools are federally mandated which is good
but they are not funded so we have taxpayers and property owners against children and school systems
i say have federal government pay for school systems and we raid the caymen islands and off shore havens, get several trillion dollars and have all public schools funded for the next hundred years
all the property tax we save will go into economy and pull us out of the depressin
Well, occupying the Caymans would be a much better use of the military than any other I have heard. And as Granada shows us, we are actually able to "win" when we take on a tiny island.
Look around you, the homeless and soon to be are everywhere. Reagan, et all, were/are telling the truth about big government, but lied/lie about why. Socialism isn't the final solution, but would be a step in the right direction.
The killers running the world have to go, one way or another. We all know it.
Elections? Won't happen in a rigged system.
Revolution? I doubt it. Too many; are brainwashed into believing capitalism equals freedom, are afraid to organize and act, unwilling to sacrifice, lack empathy. Too many are distracted trying to survive.
Best bet? The rest of the people living on the planet. They could shut the u.s. down over night with sanctions and trade embargoes. That is why "they", the controllers, slam the United Nations. It's their biggest fear, organized global rejection.
"They" have snowed the u.s. public, but the blizzard is yet to come.
Since the global corporations have taken control of governments around the globe won't it be difficult for other nations to gang up and force the US's hand ?
Absolutely some are in cahoots with the economic masters. Many of the "coalition" nations are experiencing civil unrest exactly because their leadership, sock puppet dictators, sheiks, phony presidents, have bargained with the devils. Think Middle East. Other nations have already rejected the capitalist song and dance. Think South and Central America. Still others have seen the destruction of modern warfare and decided to take a more social approach. Think Europe.
Britain and its two bastard sons, u.s. and australia, still rule by force, military and economic. But, their power is waining. China has its hands on the u.s.'s reins, but doesn't want to kill its cash cow for a few extra burgers today. They want to milk it.
The world is changing and environmentalism is a global common cause. Capitalism is environmentalism's nemesis.
Buck,
I think you got it just right. I would add that it might be an advantage to begin to think around the paradigm of nations.
Corporations have used nationhood and nationalism to divide the working class for a long time.
The corporations know no national allegiance, they function only in their own self-interest.
Personally, my self interest aligns with the poor and working class of the rest of the planet much more closely than with the corporate class of my native nation.
And in order to challenge corporate control, I think we need to begin to form coalitions across national borders on a broader range of issues. Unity is strength.
iowapinko,
Truer words have never been spoken. What you describe is a brotherhood of the human specie, no borders, no bounds. Marx thought it was the way to peace and equality.
Simple Fact
there are more of us than them
Peace and goodwill, Buck
You make a lot of great points.
I keep thinking the revolution is coming but people just trying to survive aren't concerned with the bigger picture.
The French can protest because they have enough economic security to do so.
Unfortunately the end-game is not going to be pretty. There will be a point where the people are going to realize that all their freedom is gone and they are essentially slaves.
The extremely wealthy are one charismatic leader away from socialism and they have brought it on themselves. Whether that turns into a full-fledged revolution or a more civil outcome remains to be seen but something is definitely coming.
kieroneil,
I wish I could believe a civil change was possible, but I don't. The ubers have control of the government, which controls the police and military, and will use violent force to the very end to maintain their perceived status. My guess is that hunger will be the catalyst.
peace and goodwill, Buck
Obama a socialist?
I've been privileged to know many socialists in my life. I'm a socialist myself.
We believe in the inherent equality of all people and that equality should be manifest in the structure of our social environment.
It is the role of govt. to establish and maintain the inherent dignity, worth and equality of every person within the full and broad spectrum of human diversity.
Obama is no socialist. Not even close.
The right pulls a very simple but successful political stunt over and over. If your political ideas can not successfully stand up against something, you must vilify that thing. Most peoples lives would be better under democratic socialism, and they know that they can't successfully argue against that fact. So what do they do, they vilify it. Same with Liberal ideas. If you can't successfully argue against them then vilify the messenger. Works like a charm with the average joe/jane, especially in the case of authoritative personalities.
The other thing the right does quite well is to accuse the opposition of something they are planning to do themselves. Activist judges is a great example. Accuse liberals of being activist judges (aka legislating from the bench), then do it yourself as in the Citizens United Supreme Court case. To me, when you tell a lawyer to go back and broaden his argument so the court can give what must have been a predetermined ruling, it don't get any more "activist" than that to me anyway.
"But the deception cannot last – facts say otherwise." The author, like I USED to, gives the general public way more credit than it deserves as a group. Deception can go on in most peoples minds for a VERY long time, and then there is a fairly large part of the population that deception can go on indefinitely. Remember we have a large segment of our country that vehemently believes in a god with no proof of one, does not believe in evolution, even though there is mountains of evidence to support it, and still questions global climate change even as the ice caps melt.
IMHO until the human species moves from "I believe" because someone told me something, to "I conclude" because I studied something carefully before coming to that conclusion, we are screwed.
Exactly right!
I agree. As long as people watch a media service controlled by the rich, we will always lose.
what we have is socialism for rich people only - otherwise known as FASCISM........
and we had an answer for them back in the 1940's:
http://www.custermen.com/ItalyWW2/ILDUCE/Mussolini.htm
Yes, Rove and Rahm adopted Hitler's and Mussolini's strategies and refined them to work within US culture. Americans who like cowboys go to the Dubya used car dealership. Americans who like the passive aggressive slick soft sell go to the Obama used car dealership.
" Americans who like cowboys go to the Dubya used car dealership."
Just curious, but what does Bu$h have in common with cowboys? The reason he was alway clearing brush on his "ranch" rather than raising cattle and riding horses is because he is afraid of horses and livestock. Seriously!
Well Ronald Reagan was a real cowboy. He even starred in cowboy movies. You cant get much more authentic than that! Next thing you will be saying that Dubya should sell cows instead of used cars.
If you put on a cowboy hat and wear cowboy boots, you will surely be taken as a cowboy. Might as well say you therefore are a cowboy.
How many 4 wheel drives are on the roads? How many of them get used as a 4 wheel drive? What has reality got to do with it? Its the same with the Utes and with the longhorn picture on the bonnet and the "Bundi" sticker on the back. Reality comes with the authentic smell of B.S. and traces of it in the tray. The ones without are just B.S., of course, and that has nothing to do with anything.
You have been in Australia's country towns. Whether the farmers wear floppy cloth hats and wellington boots or steel capped boots and a woven cane hat or ride in an air-conditioned tractor and have a bald head and a belly so big they can hardly walk, - its the ones in the nice clean cowboy hats, cowboy shirt and cowboy boots and the "snowy river" logo that are real cowboys. Hope I satisfied your curiosity.
If you dont mind me saying, you seem to be out of touch with reality. You need to get out there and watch more cowboy movies. I can recommend Clint Eastwood (poor John Wayne was never elected in, you see). See if you can find some authentic Ronald Reagan movies, although, they are a bit hard to find. And if you can find some Terminator movies, you see just what it takes to be the governor of California. Come on - get with it!!!
"I wanna be a cowboy - and you can be my cowgirl ... Yippie yippie yi yippie yi yippie yi Oh" - wrongly attributed to Ronald Reagan.
Actually, he is from Texas, Austin or Eastern TX if my mind serves me correct, and I don't blame him for his disgust with that state thanks to Dubya and his rotten GOP. As for Ronnie Raygun being a cowboy, please ! He was just a lousy actor whose ability to exploit the electorate's weakness on getting star struck just so happened to win him 2 presidential terms to ruin the USA in the 1980s. Both he and I sincerely wish that Texas would have a soft heart but then again, most states are not much different from TX.
In South Dakota I saw a bumper sticker:
"My heroes killed cowboys"
In the last 10 years we have gone from capitalism to fascism so fast we didn't even see socialism go by.
aesop's dog
socialism isn't an outpost you'll pass on the road from capitalism to fascism.
You'll need to make a sharp left turn past the capitalist tar pits and continue on in that direction til you see the sign for salvation. You'll recognize it when you get there.
Actually, by my count it's been around 40. I saw this coming when Nixon was essentially driven out of office in shame. I was worried that the republicans would go nuts and start causing trouble every chance they got, and they did exactly that. They were incredibly nasty and obstructive during Carter's presidency, and brought us Reagan, after he illegally bargained with the Iranians to hold our people until after the swearing in. I always thought it was pretty remarkable how he knew RIGHT AFTER saying "I will"that our people had just been released. I was all of 22, and I knew we had just been bamboozled.
Then, Reagan lowered the tax rates on the rich and lied to us, telling us that it would lead to jobs. It did, but just NOT jobs for US. And it's been downhill ever since. Bush I brought us the "new world order", which just meant class war openly against everyone who wasn't already stinking rich. Clinton brought us NAFTA and GATT, which started driving the nail into the box around us, and lied to us that it would lead to jobs. It did, but NOT jobs for US. Then W came along, was illegally handed the office by the SCOTUS, bought and paid for by the too damned rich. He did even more tax breaks for the too damned rich, and told us it would lead to jobs. It did, but NOT for US. Notice a pattern here?
This has been going on for most of my life. I got to see America at it's best, and now I see what republicans and big money especially have to offer. As a result, I've come to the conclusion that the rich and big business are not worth what they cost us. A dollar given to a poor person gets spent 7 times but the time it gets back to the head office. The same dollar given to a rich person ends up costing us $0.40 and it tends to not see the light of day again.
The biggest lie they tell is that if we don't give them tax breaks, they won't hire anyone. They have those tax breaks NOW, where are the jobs? They are lying, and it's costing us our ability to move forward and put our country back together. Time to deal with them once and for all.
I don't think the left emphasizes enough the roots of the Reagan Revolution: He was an actor performing a role for the television. The GOP understood that people were generally ignorant of the class-struggles that took place in the 1880s to 1930s. The rest of the world celebrated May Day and America, who inspired it, couldn't figure out why. Instead, Americans were glued to their television sets, on which played an alternate version of American history, filled with the expansion of the American West, cowboys, soldiers, and other individualist heroes. Ayn Rands themes were made for Hollywood, which is how she ended up there, whereas groups of people working in concernt over decades to ensure workers rights; that just didn't translate well to the TV screen. In the 1960's and 70's, traditional leftists engaged in mass protest were often horribly treated by the authorities. All that remained by the '80s was a more hedonistic 'me-first' attitude that, in essence, promoted a person not as a member of a group but as an individual with his or her own brand. This individual was informed not by the group but by the TV, and the TV told you what brand you needed to consume to be you. When hard times hit, these people had no support structure to lean on, just their televisions. Reagan tapped into these 'individualists', and told them their hard times were caused by the government and liberals, and these individuals had nowhere to turn to to get a competing message. This is still going on today: GOP individuals turn on their televisions, and their televisions instruct them on what to buy, and what to think, in order to be themselves.
Now that this has all led where we knew it would lead, the push will be on in corporate America to convince the viewer that its all my fault, and yours. The counterpush has to include some history on actual class-struggle and what it has done for citizens and a big push for people to shoot their televisions.
Corporate welfare and other tax breaks for the rich give them more money to speculate on commodities, resulting in higher inflation, more money to speculate on outcomes like selling bogus mortgages and betting against them. Raygun and his successors from both parties have not only allowed the rich to decriminalize most high level white collar crimes, they have enabled decriminalization (euphemistically called deregulation)in order to get more corporate campaign contributions.