Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama’s Health Care Bill Is Enough to Make You Sick
A close reading of the new health care legislation, which will conveniently take effect in 2014 after the next presidential election, is deeply depressing. The legislation not only mocks the lofty promises made by President Barack Obama, exposing most as lies, but sadly reconfirms that our nation is hostage to unchecked corporate greed and abuse. The simple truth, that single-payer nonprofit health care for all Americans would dramatically reduce costs and save lives, that the for-profit health care system is the problem and must be destroyed, is censored out of the public debate by a media that relies on these corporations as major advertisers and sponsors, as well as a morally bankrupt Democratic Party that is as bought off by corporations as the Republicans.
The 2,000-page piece of legislation, according to figures compiled by Physicians for a National Health Plan (PNHP), will leave at least 23 million people without insurance, a figure that translates into an estimated 23,000 unnecessary deaths a year among people who cannot afford care. It will permit prices to climb so that many of us will soon be paying close to 10 percent of our annual income to buy commercial health insurance, although this coverage will only pay for about 70 percent of our medical expenses. Those who become seriously ill, lose their incomes and cannot pay skyrocketing premiums will be denied coverage. And at least $447 billion in taxpayer subsidies will now be handed to insurance firms. We will be forced by law to buy their defective products. There is no check in the new legislation to halt rising health care costs. The elderly can be charged three times the rates provided to the young. Companies with predominantly female work forces can be charged higher gender-based rates. The dizzying array of technical loopholes in the bill-written in by armies of insurance and pharmaceutical lobbyists-means that these companies, which profit off human sickness, suffering and death, can continue their grim game of trading away human life for money.
"They named this legislation the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and as the tradition of this nation goes, any words they put into the name of a piece of legislation means the opposite," said single-payer activist Dr. Margaret Flowers when I heard her and Helen Redmond dissect the legislation in Chicago at the Socialism 2010 Conference last month. "It neither protects patients nor leads to affordable care."
"This legislation moves us further in the direction of the commodification of health care," Flowers went on. "It requires people to purchase health insurance. It takes public dollars to subsidize the purchase of that private insurance. It not only forces people to purchase this private product, but uses public dollars and gives them directly to these corporations. In return, there are no caps on premiums. Insurance companies can continue to raise premiums. We estimate that because they are required to cover people with pre-existing conditions, although we will see if this happens, they will argue that they will have to raise premiums."
The legislation included a few tiny improvements that have been used as bait to sell it to the public. The bill promises, for example, to expand community health centers and increase access to primary-care doctors. It allows children to stay on their parent's plan until they turn 26. It will include those with pre-existing conditions in insurance plans, although Flowers warns that many technicalities and loopholes make it easy for insurance companies to drop patients. Most of the more than 30 million people currently without insurance, and the 45,000 who die each year because they lack medical care, essentially remain left out in the cold, and things will not get better for the rest of us.
"We are still a nation full of health care hostages," Redmond said. "We live in fear of losing our health care. Millions of people have lost their health care. We fear bankruptcy. The inability to pay medical bills is the No. 1 cause of bankruptcy. We fear not being able to afford medications. Millions of people skip medications. They skip these medications to the detriment of their health. We are not free. And we won't be free until health care is a human right, until health care is not tied to a job, because we still have an employment-based system, and until health care has nothing to do with immigration status. We don't care if you are documented or undocumented. It should not matter what your health care status is, if you have a disease or you don't. It should not matter how much money you have or don't, because many of our programs are based on income eligibility rules. Until we abolish the private, for-profit health insurance industry in this county we are not free. Until we take the profit motive out of health care we cannot live in the way we want to live. This legislation doesn't do any of that. It doesn't change those basic facts of our health care system."
Redmond held up a syringe.
"I take a medication that costs $1,700 every single month," she said. "I inject this medication. It costs $425 a week for 50 milligrams of medication. I would do almost anything to get this medication because without it I don't have much of a life. The pharmaceutical industry knows this. They price these drugs accordingly to the level of desperation that people feel. Billy Tauzin, the former CEO of [the trade organization of] Big Pharma, negotiated a secret deal with President Obama to extend the patents of biologics, this new revolutionary class of drugs, for 12 years. And Obama also promised in this deal that he would not negotiate drug prices for Medicare."
Obama's numerous betrayals-from his failure to implement serious environmental reform at Copenhagen, to his expansion of the current wars, to his refusal to create jobs for our desperate class of unemployed and underemployed, to his gutting of public education, to his callous disregard for the rights of workers and funneling of trillions in taxpayer money to banks-is a shameful list. Passing universal, single-payer nonprofit health care for all Americans might have delivered to Obama, who may well be a one-term president, at least one worthwhile achievement. Single-payer nonprofit health care has widespread popular support, with nearly two-thirds of the public behind it. It is backed by 59 percent of doctors. And it would have helped roll back, at least a bit, the corporate assault on the citizenry.
Medical bills lead to 62 percent of personal bankruptcies, and nearly 80 percent of these people had insurance. The U.S. spends twice as much as other industrialized nations on health care, $8,160 per capita. Private insurance bureaucracy and paperwork consume 31 percent of every health care dollar. Streamlining payment through a single nonprofit payer would save more than $400 billion per year-enough, PNHP estimates, to provide comprehensive, high-quality coverage for all Americans.
Candidate Obama promised to protect women's rights under Roe. v. Wade, something this legislation does not do. He told voters he would create a public option and then refused to consider it. The health care reform bill, to quote a statement released by PNHP, has instead "saddled Americans with an expensive package of onerous individual mandates, new taxes on workers' health plans, countless sweetheart deals with the insurers and Big Pharma, and a perpetuation of the fragmented, dysfunctional, and unsustainable system that is taking such a heavy toll on our health and economy today."
"Obama said he was going to have everybody at the table," Redmond said, "but that was a lie. Our voice was not allowed to be there. There was a blackout on our movement. We did not get media attention. We did actions all over the country but we could not get coverage. We had the ‘Mad as Hell Doctors' go across the country in a caravan, and they had rallies and meetings. If that had been a bunch of AMA Republican doctors, Cooper Anderson would have been on the caravan reporting live. NPR would have done a series. Instead, they did not get much coverage. And neither did the sit-ins and arrests at insurance companies, although we have never seen that level of activity. They turned us into a fringe movement, although poll after poll shows that the majority of people want some kind of single-payer system."
Our for-profit health system is driven by insurance companies whose goal is to avoid covering the elderly and the sick. These groups, most in need of medical care, diminish profits. Medicare, paid for by the government, removes responsibility for many of the old. Medicaid, also paid for by the government, removes the poor people, who have a greater tendency to have chronic health problems. Hefty premiums, which those who are seriously ill and lose their jobs often cannot pay, remove the very sick. If you are healthy and employed, which means you are less likely to need expensive or complex treatment, the insurance companies swoop down like birds of prey. These corporations need to control our perceptions of health care. Patients must be viewed as consumers. Doctors, identified as "health care providers," must be seen as salespeople.
Insurance companies, which will soon be able to use billions in taxpayer dollars to bolster their lobbying efforts and campaign contributions, know that single-payer nonprofit insurance means their extinction. And they will employ considerable resources to make sure single-payer nonprofit coverage is denied to the public. They correctly see this as a battle for their lives. And if human beings have to die so they can survive, they are willing to make us pay this price.
The for-profit health care industry, along with the Democratic Party, consciously set out to confuse the public debate. It created Health Care for America NOW! in 2008 and provided it with tens of millions of dollars to supposedly build a public campaign for a public option. But the organization had no intention of permitting a public option. The organization was, as Dr. Flowers said, "a very clever way to distract members of the single-payer movement and co-op some of them. They told them that the public option would become single payer, that it was a back door to single payer, although there was no evidence that was true."
Physicians for a National Health Plan attempted to fight back. It worked with a number of organizations under a coalition called the Leadership Conference for Guaranteed Health Care. The group, which included the National Nurse's Union and Health Care Now, sought meetings with members of Congress. Flowers and other advocates asked Congress members to include them in committee debates about the health care bill. But when the first debate on the health care reform took place in the Senate Finance Committee, chaired by Sen. Max Baucus, a politician who gets over 80 percent of his campaign contributions from outside his home state of Montana, they were locked out. Baucus invited 41 people to testify. None backed single payer.
The Leadership Conference, which represents more than 20 million people, again requested that one of their members testify. Baucus again refused. When the second committee meeting took place, Flowers and seven other activists stood one by one in the room and asked why the voices of the patients and the health care providers were not being heard. The eight were arrested and removed from the committee hearing.
Single-payer advocates were eventually heard on a few of the House and Senate committees. But the hearings were a charade, part of Washington's cynical political theater. It was the insurance and pharmaceutical lobbyists who were in charge. They dominated the public debate. They wrote the legislation. They determined who received lavish campaign contributions and who did not. And they won.
"We are talking about life and death, about the difference between living your life and dying," Redmond said. "And once again it came down to the Democratic Party trumping the needs of the people."
- Posted in




234 Comments so far
Show AllObama turned out to be worse than President Bush for the simple reason that we could expect everything that Bush did, but nobody expected this clown to be part and parcel of corporate fascism. His grandmother must be turning in her grave.
And his mother as well, since Obama constantly reminded us that the poor care his mother received when she died of cancer was the result of a broken system that needed reform.
Rather than reform the system, Obamacare further empowers the corporations that broke the system to begin with.
Obama kept telling us that a public option was needed to keep insurance companies honest, followed up by him telling us he would sign a bill without it (Obama's credibility gap is way wider than LBJ's ever was).
When will Obama tell us what will keep insurance companies honest now that there is no public option ?
The first inkling I had that Mr. Obama was a seasoned Flip-Flopper, was when he was in candidate mode and opted out of his pledge to accept federal matching funds -ONLY- to power his presidential bid.
To the extent that Mr. Obama flip-flopped on a pledge of his own making suggested to me that he would flip-flop on issues of far more substance, and boy was I right. I would have never imagined that Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama would be responsible for the greatest show of equality between the races...
...What I mean is who would have thunk that Blacks & Whites would both have the opportunity share the pain of the ultimate POTUS mis-rule, in contiguous elections, and ending practically in the same decade. Of course, Blacks' experience with mis-rule existed a bit before the election of 2000, however, it is an interesting and wholly irrelevant milestone.
Maybe we can ask Cuba to help set up Mission Barrio Adentro, which has used Cuban doctors to bring free health care to millions of the poor in Venezuela, in the US.
According to Coral Wynter in Green Left Weekly
"In Venezuela now there are 29,255 Cuban health specialists of which a little more than one third are doctors. The rest are nurses, and technicians in radiology, rehabilitation and engineers who repair the equipment.
In seven years, 11,500 medical centres have been built. This includes Integrated Diagnostic Centres, with more facilities than the basic clinics. About 97% of the services of Barrio Adentro are avaliable every day.
Millions of people now have access to previously unaffordable or inaccessible basic health care."
The Democrats wouldn't even respond to such a suggestion.
The Republicans would tell you that: "Only a commie like Hugo Chavez would think of doing something like that".
Remember the "public option?"
"Public option" was a cynical deceit.
Public Plan Option in a Market of Private Plans
By David Himmelstein, M.D. and Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., M.P.H.:
The "public plan option" won't work to fix the health care system for two reasons.
1. It forgoes at least 84 percent of the administrative savings available through single payer. The public plan option would do nothing to streamline the administrative tasks (and costs) of hospitals, physicians offices, and nursing homes, which would still contend with multiple payers, and hence still need the complex cost tracking and billing apparatus that drives administrative costs. These unnecessary provider administrative costs account for the vast majority of bureaucratic waste. Hence, even if 95 percent of Americans who are currently privately insured were to join the public plan (and it had overhead costs at current Medicare levels), the savings on insurance overhead would amount to only 16 percent of the roughly $400 billion annually achievable through single payer -- not enough to make reform affordable.
2. A quarter century of experience with public/private competition in the Medicare program demonstrates that the private plans will not allow a level playing field. Despite strict regulation, private insurers have successfully cherry picked healthier seniors, and have exploited regional health spending differences to their advantage. They have progressively undermined the public plan -- which started as the single payer for seniors and has now become a funding mechanism for HMOs -- and a place to dump the unprofitably ill. A public plan option does not lead toward single payer, but toward the segregation of patients, with profitable ones in private plans and unprofitable ones in the public plan.
www.pnhp.org
-----------------------------------------------
Everyone knows that successful negotiations begin from a position greater than what one actually wants. Therefore, starting negotiations with "public option" instead of single payer means that the ultimate outcome will be less than even "public option." Look what we got for "compromising."
Perhaps they planned to fail.
That is defined as capitulating, not compromising.
Although Obamacare empowers the IRS to fine you if you don't buy insurance from a private insurer, Obamacare doesn't empower any US Government agency to police those insurance companies. Enforcement will be left up to each state. 46 of the 50 states are on the verge of bankruptcy so you know how well the states will be able to fund such enforcement.
If your state attorney general is one of the 20 joining the lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare's individual mandate, please let them know you support their effort. If your State AG hasn't joined the suit, ask them why they have not.
Outside of the powerful rejoinders by those who comment on CD articles, one voice, Chris Hedges, continues to demonstrate his independence from the forces of the status quo. Chris is a truth teller of the highest order and puts to shame 90% of the wimps who characterize themselves as progressive: like who? Bill Mckibben, John Nichols, Katrina VDH, Sirota, Chernus, Hartmann, Laura Flanders, Kuttner, Lakoff, to name a few.
Keep the fires burning Chris!!!!
The only reason I keep reading this site is because of the insightful comments directed agaist the 'so called' progressive pundits.
Chris is truely one of those who is working to "push" Obama instead of kissing his arse.
Hey, the DNC had to non-reform healthcare or else no one would be putting $$$ into their election campaign coffers. The finance sector has already abandoned them for the GOP (their way of disapproving of the DNC's threatened reform of finance). And, yes, that is some serious payolla they just lost. It has probably already cost them the midterm elections.
Reform politics or nothing gets reformed.
fixcongressfirst.org or Dylan Ratigans four steps:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dylan-ratigan/fix-america-fix-the-polit_b_633052.html
Reform politics or nothing gets reformed. But, hey, look on the bright side! When it doesn't get reformed we can all complain about it! Money for insurance executives AND pundits!
I don't remember then Candidate Obama promising anything good but instead simply doing his "hope" and "change you can believe in" talk to get people to feel like he is a "promising" candidate. His bad promises got fulfilled though. He may have supported single payer when he was state senator but after getting into Washington, he was off of it. His own "mentor", Joe Liebermann, believed that companies who provide health care benefits to their employees should be taxed and more frequently audited by the IRS. With such "mentors" Obama chose to have, his plans were clear. Overall, Obama chose to side with the neoliberal and neoconservative policies. But none of that matters to most Americans. Either they will vote Republican for the worse or "defend" this administration and say "that's better than doing nothing" thereby also voting for worse because it is too easy to seduce and brainwash most of the people thanks to "faithbased" thinking.
Also, states won't be allowed to provide their own single payer under this tyrannical law. I checked again and nothing against local single payer health care but if you have to go to a hospital outside your town because none of your local hospitals offer certain services, then you are SOL. This means that profits for Big Insurance are guaranteed almost 100%.
As for community health clinics, they rely on federal funding and I have no reason to trust that this administration will keep the funding on that for long especially if those centers get overcrowded thanks to insurance being unaffordable to purchase. I seriously doubt that the funding he did provide will remain adequate enough and there is nothing to stop him from defunding them once his bailout priorities for wars and Wall $treet come up.
Speaking of Big Pharma, there is nothing for alternative medicine. In Europe and South Africa, the same alternatives are not as restricted if at all unlike the USA where everything has to go through FDA and DEA. Big Pharma has been winning with the support of those two corporate warehouse agencies rubberstamping their products in the past. Meanwhile, since I am not surprised by this administration's support of extending the patents to wipe out the competition. A truly free market would never allow phony patents like this to exist and it would never allow unfair restrictions against alternative medicine. So just like Big Insurance, the profits are guaranteed nearly 100%.
P.S.: The final package was 2700 pages, not 2000.
JB: Thanks for doing your homework here. Good post. I think it's worth adding that yesterday one of the posted CD articles spoke of the levels of contamination in our bodies from industrial effluents and toxic run-off. These chemicals are proliferating in our soil, air, and waterways. Therefore the average person, in spite of any attempts to eat well, conduct themselves with respect to healthy lifestyle habits, get exercise, etc. comes up against a very challenging foe in the form of all the poisons invading our biological tissues! In my view, this is yet another rung on the ladder of Disaster Capitalism. For without viable regulation, (the EPA essentially giving industries a free pass) we all become targets of lots of lethal material passing under the radar. Then, thus exposed, the onus is on us to pay some "protection firm" (insurance companies mirror organized crime in the tactics they presently utilize) or do what we can to offset the exposures, while often being forced to live with dis-ease.
Very little research is done (on purpose) to link these exposures with the many forms of cancer impacting so many people. Cancer is big business in the U.S. The nonsense about "finding a cure" is like sending the Pink Panther out on a detective mission. The cause is directly related to all the toxic exposures. No cure will be found in any magic pill.
Citizens truly are under siege from those who allege to protect their interests. I have never witnessed such an upside-down pyramid of inverted policies in my lifetime. When matters become this unbalanced, they cannot remain in place. Hence: collapse, and THEN the stages of rebirth.
While I won't give up doing what I can to keep myself healthy, on the chemicals I agree that we are in a lose-lose. Getting government and citizenry to rein in industrial pollution responsible for our health care woes has yet to be a less difficult task but your reply gave me a hint as to an idea on how to better counter the "don't get sick" Republican talking points. I have the points written down but need to take some time when I am free to put it together for an idea. In the meantime, thank you.
RED: You articulated the thoughts and play-outs I entertain in my own mind. Thank you for a thought-provoking, prescient post.
redwriteman, I like your post, and I have been pondering some of these questions, too.
I agree that as much as people are hurting now, they're not hurting enough. Having nothing to lose may end up being the people's greatest strength.
I moved to a farm to try to be more self-sufficient. But country folk do depend on outside sources for lots of their needs. Even the Amish around here shop at the local grocery stores. If "food drops" are necessary, they will probably take place in the city.
When Hitler came to power, the field of psychology was young. Manipulating and conditioning massive amounts of people through specialized propaganda was a new practice. Now we have it in every single aspect of our lives and we are conditioned NOT to question authority. So coco puffs has all the vitamins you need for a day, right? (You could eat the cereal - or take a multivitamin and then eat the box.) I read it on the cereal box, heard it on TV or read it in the paper so it must be true. So unless a rockefeller or a rothchild or a bilderberger grows a conscience and steps up with all his money and global power to save the masses, I'm guessing no FDR-like savior is a-comin.
Most other empires that fall do split up. Look at the ancient Roman Empire, or the modern Russian empire. So first to fall away would be our far-flung satellites like Hawaii and the Philippines. This would mean that Hawaiians and Philipinos would have to physically throw out the army and take over their bases. I think that could be done. The Hawaiians already have a secession movement. But as much as I would love to see Texas jettisoned from the Union, I don't see that one happening. Too many families spread all over the lower 48 knitting it together. The similarity is that there are so many different kinds of people in every little corner of America. You can't just give the west coast to liberals, and so on.
I don't think loss of Social Security and Medicare will put people in the streets, but hunger will.
This is my favorite line in your post: "When the military is called out to quell disorder, will the working class troops fire on the rioting unemployed?" You bet your ass they will, they're training them to do it right now with drones and Afghan children. But just for kicks, why not ask the next law officer or soldier that very question: Officer, will YOU fire on the rioting unemployed, the hungry, the sick? If you know somebody from Pittsburgh, you could ask them what they think.
We already have elements of martial law, via a "terror" emergency declared by the executive branch of our government. We may not be on lockdown yet, but we do have to allow ourselves to be strip-searched to get out of the country.
Their survival IS threatened, but people are still grazing in ignorance. We've all been so well-trained in denial.
Do the corporations care enough about their profits to realize that if they work all the people to death that stops the money flow? Sure, but that doesn't mean that any solution to that will be progressive. When the hulls of slave ships were filled, did anyone say, hey, if we give these people better living conditions, more of them will survive the voyage? No. What they did do was stuff a few thousand more people in there so that when the predictable number of them DIED, there would still be plenty left over to make a hellacious profit off of.
Thanks for the great post and the opportunity to share my thoughts on your excellent questions. Better than this article, which is pretty old news.
RED: The one thing you're missing which is much different than the 1920s, is the issue of anthropogenic climate change. I see the conditions forming for a Perfect Storm. A clash between our environment and predatory capitalism.
All great posts. Thanks. I also believe that there are many differences between now and the 1920's. I think we underestimate the advances made in surveillance, because many of the techniques are no doubt kept secret for national security reasons. I think full spectrum surveillance over our people is nearly complete. Mind you the Israelis have contributed immensely to our quest and seem to feel they are also rightful owners of this sensitive information on our people, as well. This is not speculation, as you will know if you've been watching DemocracyNow! for a few years, and "doing your homework", as Sioux says.
I also believe that we have been exposed to direct psychological experimentation ourselves. I do not happen to believe that MKULTRA ended. The power vortex created when evil and human vulnerabilities collide, I feel reaches it's apex in this endeavor. I think the very worst and deplorable aspects of humanity surface in this environment, seeming to spiral out of control. I think it is like a date rape drug. Yeah, it probably has some good uses, but look at the havoc it reeks in the wrong hands, and the wrong people always seem to get ahold of them. I think we are being very naive to think that we have not been subjected to, and will continue to be subjected to, the very latest in mind control techniques in this all-encompassing War on Terror.
In the Great Depression all workers were aware of an alternative - socialism, or at least, a very vogorous unionized workforce bargaining with one voice. Now, through the media propaganda syatem, the workers are more likely to simply join the bosses in calling for their own serfdom - as is happening to some extent right now.
Yes, the fact that so many workers supported socialism and communism in the 1930s gave FDR and progressive members of Congress leverage in passing the New Deal...right wingers didn't make too much noise, figuring that the New Deal was not as bad as the threatened commie takeover would be.
The right wingers didn't give up..they immediately started a slow but sure propaganda campaign to convince US workers to support supply-side economics. By the time Raygun moved into the white house in 1981, a turning point had been reached and the New Deal was put into a death spiral that will be complete when unemployment insurance, social security, and the few labor laws that remain are thoroughly diluted.
To some extent? I would say a majority of people think Obama is a socialist. They think unions are bad things. I have never seen so many people work so feverishly against their own self-interest. It is both bizarre and sickening. Clearly a product of the sophisticated propaganda system modern Americans face.
Your latter thoughts seem true. What some people called liberalism was by many of the elite's just a form of "fire-insurance" to keep the pitchforks out of their asses. Also before "free trade" and globalism you (as factory owner) eventually had to make some concession to workers in the form of unions, wages, and benefits. Not so any longer. Any one over 50 or 60 can recall the migration of industrial form the NE and midwest down to the SE, then to Mexico, followed by China and other desperate countries. This is the "race to the bottom" for the lower and middle class that most of us are familiar with.
Probably not yet on the total and obvious totalitarian state. Our "soft totalitarian" state with the almost total participation of mass media is much more sophisticated and effective then the iron glove variety in which it is easily apparent that everything is controlled and manipulated. It's kind of a morphing of 1984 mind think with the opiated (think infotainments and the pharmaceutical industry) products of Brave New World.
It is so effective that much of the sheepie still believe that they live in the greatest, grandest, most noble and moral society that every existed on earth or in the heavens. In the last few years this lie is becoming painfully apparent and the sheepie are feed the most incredulous red herrings as to the cause. I feel this tactic will only work for so long with the tea party types and then they will supersede their controlling elite's (maybe even get the guilletine out for them) and we will (in worst case scenario) end up with a crazy fundamentalist group much like the taliban only with a fascist edge... they being some of the only one's blind enough to inforce the exteme violent control and brutality necessary for their goals.
Hey wait a minute. You are trying to tell me that there is something worse than neoliberal fundamentalists who drone bomb women and children, laugh all the way to the bank as their government lackeys enforce mandated purchase of insurance, force feed oil down the gullets of Americans as the Gulf of Mexico becomes hopelessly choked with oil, serve up assorted franken foods replete with de-beaked chickens, engage in wars of foreign aggression killing millions of innocent people, engage in assorted soft wars replete with "silver or lead rule", engage in assorted multi-TRILLION dollar raids on the treasury under the guise of "too big to fail". The list is endless. You need not fear these neoliberals, the real enemy is the Taliban. They hang people from soccer goalposts doncha know! Men with drones, nuclear weapons, M1 tanks, Apache helicopters, sidewinder missiles, cluster bombs killing millions of innocent people aren't sufficiently brutal and extreme enough for you?
The day the tea party makes a serious dent in this corporate fascist system is the day I eat all the words I have written on this board. An astro-turf organization designed to instill fear into the Bubbas of America, it will never bite the hand that feeds them. It all depends on where you start. An organization that stokes fear and hatred, self-interest and paranoia will do nothing but further strengthen the grip of corporate fascism that currently strangulates this country.
Wow that was a righteous rant... Kudos!
Obomber, through his support and arm-twisting, has made it his own.
And it is still being reported as a "win" for Brand Obama.
Obama is expert at dusting off Republican legislation, relabelling it, getting most Congressional Democrats and no Congressional Republicans to vote for it, and declaring VICTORY !
Obama is the best Republican the Democrats ever had.
Does anyone believe it (besides the insurance companies)?
I continue to be disgusted at how many Americans (most of whom will be negatively impacted by Obamacare)have never paid any attention to what Obamacare really is...they are comforted by Obama's talking points and don't want to risk feeling the pain that is likely to result from the facts getting in the way of a good story.
"Obama's numerous betrayals-from his failure to implement serious environmental reform at Copenhagen, to his expansion of the current wars,"
Wait,one minute.
Candidate Obama was taking pay (campaign contributions) from Big Finance, Big Banking, Lawyers groups, Big Pharma; all of whom were betting on the candidate they backed, they were placing these bets knowing he would do what they were paying him to do.
President Obama is now and has been delivering for his paymasters.
Any candidate elected under the current system is contracted ahead of time by the those same folks Obama was- whose interests are at conflict with 95% of the population who have less than $195k/year to live on.
My recommendation. Next time anyone here gets a shake down call from the Democrats looking for donations, tell them you can't afford to give them a donation because you have to save your money to pay for Obama-care.
If enough people did that it may get their attention, because face it, they don't care about me and they don't care about you, but the DO care about MONEY!
They're getting so much of their money from PACs, how is my measly denial of $20 going to make any difference?
Fortunately I'm long past the point of getting hounded by Democrats for money, but this is a great idea Tom.
And this is what all the Oilbomberbots point to as his great accomplishment.
Remember
Vote Dimo
or
We may end up with ----
Endless War
Extrajudicial Executions
Indefinite Detentions
High Unemployment
Horrendous Homelessness
Wealth flowing to Uberrich
Environmental Degradation
ad nauseum
Oh I forgot
All this is being fostered by OilBomber's policies.
Yes, Obama turned what could have been a 3 year recession into not just a depression, but a paradigm change from which the US will not emerge.
Can you say THIRD WORLD NATION ?
I'm pretty sure it was a 5 year recession, minimally. That's if he nationalized the large banks, passed real finance sector and healthcare reform, and doubled to tripled the size of his stimulus package. Remember that what WallStreet did to us they also did to the rest of the world (except, apparently, China). Its a global recession, and in some cases we have to wait for the others to recover as well.
The Chinese practice market socialism, not the corporatist system we have here. That's why they will be to the 21th century what we were to the 20th.
As long as profit before care stays the law of the land which this 2700 page scam does, there will be no single payer health care for years, possibly generations, to come. When some states made purchasing auto insurance mandatory, people still didn't care to realize the scam insurance was and still is. It remains to be seen if people this 2700 page scam will force the public to see the scam that all insurance is now that it is happening to their own bodies. I hope so because the sooner we all do, the sooner we can repeal this scam and countless mandatory insurance scams throughout the country.
Auto insurance makes sense because driving is a privilege. Living life is a gift, and as such, should be a right to a healthy existence (in any civilized society).
"driving is a privilege."
That is not necessarily true. Unless everyone can find a job that is a walkable distance or has some form of affordable public transportation, most people have no choice but to drive or go homeless. We should still be free to decide if we want auto insurance or not without giving up the car.
It is unconstitutional for the government to mandate the purchase of private goods and services. If the government deems insurance necessary for the operation of an automobile, it should provide that insurance. It should be part of your registration fees when you license your automobile.
Bravo!
This will be blown away like tissue paper in a tornado. We are headed for a "black september" like in 1929, only much worse. This is like worrying about, whether or not, the doctor on the titanic will give asperins to steerage, when, before too much longer, we'll be looking for every available piece of "flotsam & jetsam" in the water that can save people from drowning.
I too see further disintegration and hardship. The paradigm shift and economic rate of decline are not balanced. Unfortunately we will be subjected to a maelstrom before minds will coalesce and new pathways appear in the form of a rebirth. We will be tested.
If Obama had represented change you can believe in, we would be well on our way to that change. Obama may not have passed anything and today he would be campaigning for change again. “People if you want change send the party of no packing and if you do not want change send me packing.” Unfortunately Obama turned out to be another fork tongue politician, just another snake in the grass. If progressive want to salvage anything for the future the smartest thing they can do is throw Obama and the rest of the bums out. Even Kucinich bailed on healthcare, if progressives had any principles they would try and send Kucinich home with Obama. Progressives will do nothing but play the lessor of two evils game, then pretend that they are a part of the solution when they are just a part of the problem. Progressives should be ashamed of themselves, sheeple by any other name are still sheeple. It is better to go down fighting than to go down because you sold your soul at the company store like Obama. Start rallying the troops for the revolution of 2012 and screw the bums. The world is not going to end no matter which bums have the power but it also will not change. “This is what we support” and if you are just a voice crying in the wilderness so be it. Time is on your side. If there is no one to support, then let your war cry be “hell no we won’t vote.” If progressives continue to play by the rules then they will never be able to say “vote for me and I will set you free.”
Thanks Mr. Hedges. You expressed my sentiments perfectly. It's good to know there are still decent and caring people like you and Margaret Flowers.
I'm one of the people that would have (if I still had a job) had to pay approximately 10% of my income for premiums alone. That is with a $5000 deductible and hefty copays too. So before insurance paid anything I'd have to spend at least 30% of my income. I feel I'd be better off trying to pay the doctor cash for any care.
It's a shame we haven't had single payer throughout my adulthood. I would have had little qualm paying 10% of my income to cover the costs for the government to provide my insurance. This is one area I believe a flat tax on everybody would be appropriate. The WHO actually says something like anything over 8% of a person's income for healthcare is an onerous burden.
The flat tax is highly regressive.
You got health care in this legislation, which is the equivalent to the flat tax.
If you support the flat tax, you vote against your own interests.
good Grief.
"The flat tax is highly regressive."
A flat tax is regressive. I think you misunderstood my sentiment. A 10% tax on all people's income strictly to cover the costs of their medical care. I'm poor but I'd pay it with little complaint. My care might cost more than 10% of my income but the hedge fund manager that "made" a billion would pay 100 million that would cover his care plus hundreds if not thousands of others. You could say the rich would get ripped off because the 10% contribution would cost far more than their care ever would. But I'm not one to fret too much over the wealthy's so called burdens.
If I implied nothing but a flat tax I apologize. I proposed one for nothing more than medical care devoted strictly to people's medical care as an autonomous fund. I'd want to keep an income tax with rate similar to the Eisenhower era for most other functions.
Isn't Social Security essentially a flat tax? Everybody pays approximately the same percentage into the fund? The $100,000 ceiling on contributions ought to removed which would probably make it solvent indefinitely and allow the proper increases in payouts due to inflation.
I do not think my proposal is regressive. Are you too cheap to chip in 10% of your income to make sure everyone's medical care costs are covered? I'm not. Plus your's and everybody else's care would never cost them more than 10% of their income. Seems somewhat egalitarian to me but I know that's not a common sentiment in the US.
your post was thoughtful. unfortunately the right isn't the only population whose knees can jerk at the drop of a buzzword.
My point, if I may have one, is that we, being poor, should not give any idealogical ground to the flat taxers, or sharing the cost BS. There should be no limit to the amount taxed for SS. And the rich should be taxed until they have only a few million left. Hedge funds are taxed at the lowest rate for capital gains. They pay few income taxes. Until the capital gains taxes are increased you will not touch the rich.
I got absolutely no sympathy for the rich. They cause wars in which they don't bleed. The cause the poverty in which they make obscene amounts of money. They cause the "health care" problems in which they don't share. The rich are blood sucking parasites. And the only solution is to tax 99 percent of their wealth away and don't let them past it on to their heirs.
Take their money, and we take their power.
"I would have had little qualm paying 10% of my income to cover the costs for the government to provide my insurance."
I've made similar comments to conservatives (my family and their friends are all rightwing, Fox News- Rush Limbaugh fans), sharing knowledge of people who live in Europe who report paying about $150-200 a month for their health care, with no copays, no deductibles, no worries about being denied coverage no matter how serious or expensive their illness. When I share this information and say that I would much rather pay taxes for health care I know I am guaranteed to have, rather than give money to a for-profit insurance company that can pull the plug on me any time or shift costs to me*, the rightwingers say maybe I should move to Europe then. (These are older people who have Medicare, who are opposed to any change. I remind them that Medicare didn't come about until the 1960s. They don't want to see it go away; they just don't want everyone else to have it.)
*speaking of costs shifting to the client, I had major surgery in 2008 and am still paying the bill for the surgeon. Indigent funding covered the hospital bill. This year I had outpatient surgery, with health insurance, and ended up owing more than I did for the major surgery. Insurance also refused to cover a followup diagnostic test to check for cancer after I underwent a biopsy last year- that was completely covered by a program for uninsured/poor people in my state. So, I ended up further in debt, with insurance.
People will vote for and protect Medicare because we know what it is. Medicare is "single payer" but nobody knew that and single payer sounds like the patient must pay all.
So they had to come up with a new name for Medicare that would guarantee an expansion or improvement of Medicare and Medicaid would not pass.
Guess what name they came up with...