Most Popular This Week
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- 'We Are Movement, Not a Moment': North Carolina Peaceful Uprising Continues
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- Is Enbridge Building a Secret Keystone Pipeline?
- Naomi Klein: 'Anti-Shock Doctrines' Show the Way to Resist
- Victory: Connecticut Becomes First State to Require GMO Labeling
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Lowdown from Hightower
I first became aware of Jim Hightower more than 20 years ago, during the 1988 Democratic National Convention in Atlanta. The Democrats were nominating Massachusetts Governor Mike Dukakis to run for president against Reagan's vice president, George H.W. Bush, and at the time Dukakis looked like he had a pretty good chance at the White House.
This was before a series of events did him in, including the notorious Willie Horton ad that attacked Dukakis for a Massachusetts weekend furlough prison program that allowed a convicted murderer back on the street, where he robbed and raped.
And it was before Dukakis bobbled a harsh debate question about what he would do if his own wife Kitty was raped and murdered. And it was before he was photographed atop an Abrams tank wearing a helmet that made him look like he was starring in Snoopy III: This Time It's Personal.
All of that misery lay ahead. The Democrats were still in giddy spirits during the convention and had a high old time poking fun at Bush, Sr. That was when the late Ann Richards, then the Texas state treasurer, famously lamented, "Poor George! He can't help it -- he was born with a silver foot in his mouth!"
But it was the convention speech by Hightower that I especially remember. He was the Texas agriculture commissioner in those days -- an important job in the Lone Star State -- and described Bush as a "toothache of a man," a cruel but remarkable metaphor. And he said that Bush behaved like someone who was "born on third base and thought he hit a triple... He is threatening to lead this country from tweedle-dum to tweedle-dumber."
Maybe Hightower didn't originate those lines (as Milton Berle used to say, "When you steal from me, you steal twice"), but he delivered them with a gusto akin to genuine authorship and over the years has come up with enough original material of his own to absolve him -- mostly -- from the sin of occasional joke-filching.
Now others steal from him. It was Jim, I believe, who came up with the notion that all elected officials be required to wear brightly colored, NASCAR-like jumpsuits with the corporate logos of their biggest campaign contributors, an idea I've heard appropriated by several others without proper attribution.
And I think it was Jim who first said of George W. Bush, "If ignorance ever reaches $40 a barrel, I want the drilling rights to his head." (On hearing that another Texas politician was learning Spanish, Hightower is supposed to have remarked, "Oh good. Now he'll be bi-ignorant.")
These days, Jim Hightower broadcasts daily radio commentaries and edits "The Hightower Lowdown," an invaluable monthly newsletter. With the passing of both Ann Richards and Molly Ivins, he has became the funniest person in Texas politics -- intentionally, that is. But it is his steadfast advocacy of progressive politics, his unyielding embrace of the old time gospel of populism, that made him an especially appropriate guest on the final edition of the PBS series, Bill Moyers Journal.
"Here's what populism is not," he told my colleague Bill Moyers. "It is not just an incoherent outburst of anger. And certainly it is not anger that is funded and organized by corporate front groups, as the initial tea party effort [was], and as most of it is still today -- though there is legitimate anger within it, in terms of the people who are there. But what populism is at its essence is just a determined focus on helping people be able to get out of the iron grip of the corporate power that is overwhelming our economy, our environment, energy, the media, government.
"...One big difference between real populism and... the tea party thing is that real populists understand that government has become a subsidiary of corporations. So you can't say, 'Let's get rid of government.' You need to be saying, 'Let's take over government.'"
As Hightower's fond of saying, the water won't clear up until we get the hogs out of the creek. "I see the central issue in politics to be the rise of corporate power," he reiterated. "Overwhelming, overweening corporate power that is running roughshod over the workaday people of the country. They think they're the top dogs, and we're a bunch of fire hydrants, you know?"
Of President Obama he said, "It's odd to me that we've got a president who ran from the outside and won, and now is trying to govern from the inside. You can't do progressive government from the inside. You have to rally those outsiders and make them a force... Our heavyweight is the people themselves. They've got the fat cats, but we've got the alley cats..."
This weekend, Jim is being honored at Texas State University-San Marcos with an exhibition celebrating his life's work as a populist journalist, historian and advocate. They're calling the event "Swim Against the Current" because, as Moyers says, "That's what he does."
In fact, "Swim Against the Current" also is the title of Hightower's most recent book, subtitled, "Even a Dead Fish Can Go with the Flow." He comes from a long history of flow resisters, a critical, American political tradition. "I go all the way back to Thomas Paine," he said. "I mean, that was kind of the ultimate rebellion, when the media tool was a pamphlet." The men who wrote the Bill of Rights, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence "didn't create democracy. [They] made democracy possible.
"What created democracy was Thomas Paine and Shays Rebellion, the suffragists and the abolitionists and on down through the populists and the labor movement, including the Wobblies. Tough, in your face people... Mother Jones, Woody Guthrie... Martin Luther King and Caesar Chavez. And now it's down to us.
"These are agitators. They extended democracy decade after decade. You know, sometimes we get in the midst of these fights. We think we're making no progress. But... you look back, we've made a lot of progress... The agitator after all is the center post in the washing machine that gets the dirt out. So, we need a lot more agitation...
"We can battle back against the powers. But it's not just going to a rally and shouting. It's organizing and it's thinking. And reaching out to others. And building a real people's movement."
A personal note: With this week's edition, Bill Moyers Journal goes off the air. But we'll be continuing the conversation via our website at www.PBS.org/moyers. These weekly columns will be continuing for the foreseeable as well. It has been a delight and honor collaborating with Bill -- and the entire production team -- so intensely over the last two years. I am always improved in their presence and thank them all, especially Bill and executive editor Judith Davidson Moyers, executive producers Judy Doctoroff and Sally Roy and Diane Domondon and Jesse Adams, the two of whom every week have made sure these scratchings make it out alive, with alacrity and accuracy.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

23 Comments so far
Show All"It's odd to me that we've got a president who ran from the outside and won, and now is trying to govern from the inside."
He may have run from the outside but that was all for show. Remember Obama was the head of the Harvard Law Review, no outsider status there. He received more $$ from Goldman Sachs than any other candidate, and he pledged to increase the Pentagon budget during the campaign. In all likliehood, he ahs been an intelligence asset since his college years.
Our electoral system may allow candidates to pose as outsiders, but it will never allow an actual outsider to win.
The most our presidential elections allow is for us to lodge a protest vote or to choose whichever insider we think will do less damage.
DreamJoeHill. A clear lesson in Amercan Politics 101. Here's a comment from Joe Bageant that fits right in: In America the job of local politics is to take virgins and turn them into whores. At the national level they take those whores and pass them off as virgins.
Thanks for the Joe Bageant quote! It says it all, doesn't it?
dreamjoehill: I didn't ever see, or recognize, Obama as an outsider, either.
He received obscene amount of money from corporations -- Wall Street and the health care industries, among other industries and organizations that support corportations.
And, his intent to escalate the war in Afghanistan was only one of the reasons I did NOT vote for him, choosing to pull the lever for Ralph Nader, instead.
Google "Santa Clara County vs. Southern Pacific Railroad"
to see where we lost our government to Corporate Personhood.
"What created democracy was Thomas Paine and Shays Rebellion, the suffragists and the abolitionists and on down through the populists and the labor movement, including the Wobblies. Tough, in your face people... Mother Jones, Woody Guthrie... Martin Luther King and Caesar Chavez. And now it's down to us."
Yup. That pretty well sums up the situation.
Unfortunately, even if "us" includes some tough, in your face people, the days when "the media tool was a pamphlet" are long past. Almost all of the current media tools are in the hands of the same corporate powers who benefit from the status quo -- with a little assistance from the Supreme Court. By comparison, rebellion against the British Empire's "Colonel Blimps" was a cakewalk.
You can change the king but it doesn't change the kingdom. Our political system is rotten at the core.
Hoa binh
The kingdom is us, and if you are suggesting that We the People are rotten to the core, I suggest you speak for yourself.
Our political system may be rotten, but that has happened in direct proportion to the amount we have allowed it to be. Since the 60's, when so much was gained through years of battling, we have sat back and spectated. We need to learn how to fight. We equally need to learn never to sit back again. The fight is NEVER over.
Hightower, Moyers, et al, are all but giving us the blueprints to creating a democratic nation. The building part is up to us. Always has been.
Ted, thank you for spelling out what we need to do and that is first to listen when someone makes viable suggestions rather than infuse what they are saying with critisisms and complaints without offering alternatives. Passive activists seldom accomplishment much. It is fine to disagree but back up the disagreement with something positive as an alternative. It boils down to the old 'together we stand and divided we fall. The MSM is hell bent on dividing the country into so many divisions that no one is exactly sure where they stand on any given issue and as long as we remain divided nothing will happen but more of the same. United there will be a chance when every one gets on the same page, puts aside petty differences and begins to consider what is the best solution for the community, not just for each individual. None of this is in or a part of any agenda that will ever be embrassed by either political party. The decisions being made by both parties have nothing to do with the communities that they represent, only for the powers to be that control their campaign spending. That leaves only we the people to fend for ourselves and it must be a cohesive resolution whereby we stand together to fight for the rights afforded us by the Constitution.
"That leaves only we the people to fend for ourselves and it must be a cohesive resolution whereby we stand together to fight for the rights afforded us by the Constitution."
This is true - we are left to fend for ourselves.
As far as a cohesive resolution goes, I'm not sure what more we need to be cohesive about beyond being robbed in broad daylight, losing our jobs and/or homes, having elections bought and stolen, being made to work crappy jobs we hate just to keep our (often worthless) health insurance, losing our communities to big box stores and corporate ticky tack, and on and on. We have lost so much and we can't come around an issue to fight for?
Maybe there are too many fronts. Maybe we feel so besieged that all we can do is pull up a lawn chair and bitch. Maybe we have fallen under a spell and are in some kind of walking coma. I really don't know. All I know is that if we can't be cohesive, we can still fight back. I've been saying this ad nauseum and I'm sure folks are getting sick of hearing it, but I have yet to be proven wrong on my premise that we must each act in our own way. Screw cohesion, we have to act!
In my view, the most direct and impactful way to do that is to withdraw, as much as possible, from the financial game. The System runs on money - it is its life-blood. If we want to have an impact, we must stop the life-blood. Maybe that's something we can organize around. Maybe we can organize groups of people to come up with ways to live on less, to consume less, and to give support to one another. This is what I have done and will continue to do. And I believe that the System is scared shitless by people who are not so dependent on it.
Need less. Buy less. Waste less. Build community. It's a multi-win approach.
Oh, we also need to pressure OUR representatives at all levels to actually represent us. The people in Iowa did it - we can do it!
I had DVR'd Journal & watched Moyers last program last night. It was excellent.
But I disagree with both Moyers and Hightower that the answer to our problems lie within some sort of restoration of the democratic party. The democratic party needs to be regulated to the dustbin of history.
Sioux Rose
MOON: I think you meant the democratic party needs to be relegated to... and in that respect, I agree.
The answer begins with finding a way to take campaign contributions (bribery?) out of the equation.
Bring America Back !!!!
***I must recommend to our Prog Base to play the Video
of Moyers interviewing Hightower==available in the CD
Progressive newswire column today.
***Because during the interview Hightower does actually
throw out for consideration, a rare Solution to getting
the grassroots organized and mobilized, and Winship here
glosses over it entirely in his sad farewell to Moyers
Journal.
***Hightower says there are now "cooperatives" or "co-ops"
mainly thruout the midwest with over 120 million members,
who exist to care for their own--but who have political
stakes like all of us.
***May I suggest with 120 million, say Rambos, several
of Hightower's Hogs could be nudged out of the Creek. !
Maybe Winship just does not want to get all dirtied up
slopping the hogs ????...Even though, as his mentor Moyers says'''He is very biased against the Plutocrats & the Plutonomy !
I have known of our plutocracy for years. However, to see an actual memo from a too-large bank (CITI) outlining and planning for the new plutonomy was astounding, even in this day and age.
The linchpin in all of this - the problems and the solutions - lies with the people. We need to move from outrage to work. We need to do what the people in Iowa did in Moyers' first segment. We need to organize co-ops, as Hightower suggested. We need to realize that in order for good to exist, bad must exist, and our fight against the latter is never over (and shouldn't be).
Power will always want more, and without stiff resistance, will take it. Those in the 50's and 60's paved the way for us, but we lost sight of that in the 80's and 90's, when greed was exalted. Now, greed is systemic and we have the devil to pay for it. We need to BE different and DO different if we want our own future to be anywhere near decent.
Anyone who still believes that the Democrat Party can be
rebuilt, reformed, changed from within is dreaming.
Not in one year, five years, or twenty years, it can't
happen, How is it going too?, trying to get progressive
candidates? Can't happen.
Schumer's bill is not going to change campaign finance
a little bit.
It needs to be administered Euthanasia. Get rid of it
a start it over is the only chance, if any, we have to get
rid of fascism.
Americans are so stupid, ignorant and suppliant that they accept an Italian fascist Democratic party and a German fascist Republican party as their only hopes.
Well, people who will kiss the ass of the boss just to hold on to a wage slave job deserve what they get, and they deserve to get it good and hard.
And what do you expect to achieve with such insulting talk? Of course both parties are rotten to the core but just what do you think you are gaining by insulting voters as "always failure" ? What do you propose to help put them on a track to getting it right? Start with a few and build up.
george sebouhian: anyone who mentions Shay's Rebellion has to be a REAL democrat!
While I respect the work of both Moyers and Hightower, I cannot in all honesty agree with their assessment of the Democratic Party. The DP has repeatedly shown where it's true interests lie; corporate America. Never forget that it was the DP who gave us NAFTA. It is the DP that continues to push the illegal, immoral and unjustified wars in Afghanistan and Iraq! It is the DP that refuses to pursue criminal action against the Bush regime for violation of our Constitution, war crimes and crimes against humanity! It is the DP that caved into the corporate bosses of the healthcare insurance monopolies and gave us a watered down version of healthcare crap!
So long as the DP continues to suckle on the corporate tit, there will be NO change! I would propose that Hightower, Moyers, Kucinich, McKinney, Nader and other nationally known progressive leaders come to some kind of understanding and agree to organize a viable third party. A third party free from corporate domination and influence! A third party that is committed to upholding the Constitution, peace, full employment, labor rights, civil rights, protection of our environment, etc. Only then will there ever be a semblance of true democracy in the United States of America!
I agree with Jason, and as Hightower said, Congress is a subsidiary of the corporations, and so are the politicians and their respective Parties. WE... WE the people are the third party. Hightower and Moyers do their level best to get us to see that. WE have to think and plan how best to thwart the shortsighted policies of these wealthy corporations. King and Ghandi used resistive methods in both small and huge ways that forced the big boys to change their ways. This is the history of humanity all over the world. WE, the ordinary workers must be aware and work every day to thwart greed, a basic human characteristic. Howard Zinn also said that WE must force Obama to be better; the force of the corporations on him are huge. The only solution is that we must be bigger than the corporations.
"Lazy ass progressives who would rather debate ad infinitum versus true believer riled up religious go getters? Get it?"
Ok, we get your point but such name-calling and Reaganesque talk doesn't help anyone. I know you can think better than that. You might try encouraging more self-confidence and team building and confidence. Let me help you out here. The progressives on this site have plenty of self confidence but no team confidence where it is needed whereas the party loyalists have some team confidence but lack of self confidence on getting progressive and liberal causes to see the light of day. Forums are meant to enlighten, not for people to call others "lazy ass". Besides, there were plenty of anti-war protests as well as against the bailouts for the banks but none of it made a difference. That and similar tragedies in the last decade would have broken our hearts and the last thing we need are people like you to rub salt onto our wounds by calling us "lazy ass".