EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Shrimp's Dirty Secrets: Why America's Favorite Seafood Is a Health and Environmental Nightmare
The environmental impact of shrimp can be horrific. But most Americans don't know where their shrimp comes from or what's in it.
Americans love their shrimp. It's the most popular seafood in the country, but unfortunately much of the shrimp we eat are a cocktail of chemicals, harvested at the expense of one of the world's productive ecosystems. Worse, guidelines for finding some kind of "sustainable shrimp" are so far nonexistent.
In his book, Bottomfeeder: How to Eat Ethically in a World of Vanishing Seafood, Taras Grescoe paints a repulsive picture of how shrimp are farmed in one region of India. The shrimp pond preparation begins with urea, superphosphate, and diesel, then progresses to the use of piscicides (fish-killing chemicals like chlorine and rotenone), pesticides and antibiotics (including some that are banned in the U.S.), and ends by treating the shrimp with sodium tripolyphosphate (a suspected neurotoxicant), Borax, and occasionally caustic soda.
Upon arrival in the U.S., few if any, are inspected by the FDA, and when researchers have examined imported ready-to-eat shrimp, they found 162 separate species of bacteria with resistance to 10 different antibiotics. And yet, as of 2008, Americans are eating 4.1 pounds of shrimp apiece each year -- significantly more than the 2.8 pounds per year we each ate of the second most popular seafood, canned tuna. But what are we actually eating without knowing it? And is it worth the price -- both to our health and the environment?
Understanding the shrimp that supplies our nation's voracious appetite is quite complex. Overall, the shrimp industry represents a dismantling of the marine ecosystem, piece by piece. Farming methods range from those described above to some that are more benign. Problems with irresponsible methods of farming don't end at the "yuck," factor as shrimp farming is credited with destroying 38 percent of the world's mangroves, some of the most diverse and productive ecosystems on earth. Mangroves sequester vast amounts of carbon and serve as valuable buffers against hurricanes and tsunamis. Some compare shrimp farming methods that demolish mangroves to slash-and-burn agriculture. A shrimp farmer will clear a section of mangroves and close it off to ensure that the shrimp cannot escape. Then the farmer relies on the tides to refresh the water, carrying shrimp excrement and disease out to sea. In this scenario, the entire mangrove ecosystem is destroyed and turned into a small dead zone for short-term gain. Even after the shrimp farm leaves, the mangroves do not come back.
A more responsible farming system involves closed, inland ponds that use their wastewater for agricultural irrigation instead of allowing it to pollute oceans or other waterways. According to the Monterey Bay Aquarium's Seafood Watch program, when a farm has good disease management protocols, it does not need to use so many antibiotics or other chemicals.
One more consideration, even in these cleaner systems, is the wild fish used to feed farmed shrimp. An estimated average of 1.4 pounds of wild fish are used to produce every pound of farmed shrimp. Sometimes the wild fish used is bycatch -- fish that would be dumped into the ocean to rot if they weren't fed to shrimp -- but other times farmed shrimp dine on species like anchovies, herring, sardines and menhaden. These fish are important foods for seabirds, big commercial fish and whales, so removing them from the ecosystem to feed farmed shrimp is problematic.
Additionally, some shrimp are wild-caught, and while they aren't raised in a chemical cocktail, the vast majority is caught using trawling, a highly destructive fishing method. Football field-sized nets are dragged along the ocean floor, scooping up and killing several pounds of marine life for every pound of shrimp they catch and demolishing the ocean floor ecosystem as they go. Where they don't clear-cut coral reefs or other rich ocean floor habitats, they drag their nets through the mud, leaving plumes of sediment so large they are visible from outer space.
After trawling destroys an ocean floor, the ecosystem often cannot recover for decades, if not centuries or millennia. This is particularly significant because 98 percent of ocean life lives on or around the seabed. Depending on the fishery, the amount of bycatch (the term used for unwanted species scooped up and killed by trawlers) ranges from five to 20 pounds per pound of shrimp. These include sharks, rays, starfish, juvenile red snapper, sea turtles and more. While shrimp trawl fisheries only represent 2 percent of the global fish catch, they are responsible for over one-third of the world's bycatch. Trawling is comparable to bulldozing an entire section of rainforest in order to catch one species of bird.
Given this disturbing picture, how can an American know how to find responsibly farmed or fished shrimp? Currently, it's near impossible. Only 15 percent of our total shrimp consumption comes from the U.S. (both farmed and wild sources). The U.S. has good regulations on shrimp farming, so purchasing shrimp farmed in the U.S. is not a bad way to go. Wild shrimp, with a few exceptions, is typically obtained via trawling and should be avoided. The notable exceptions are spot prawns from British Columbia, caught in traps similar to those used for catching lobster, and the small salad shrimp like the Northern shrimp from the East Coast or pink shrimp from Oregon, both of which are certified as sustainable by the Marine Stewardship Council. However, neither are true substitutes for the large white and tiger shrimp American consumers are used to.
The remaining 85 percent came from other countries and about two-thirds of our imports are farmed with the balance caught in the wild, mostly via trawling. China is the world's top shrimp producer -- both farmed and wild -- but only 2 percent of China's shrimp are imported to the U.S. The world's number two producer, Thailand, is our top foreign source of shrimp. Fully one third of the shrimp the U.S. imports comes from Thailand, and over 80 percent of those shrimp are farmed.
The next biggest sources of U.S. shrimp are Ecuador, Indonesia, China, Mexico, Vietnam, Malaysia and India. Together, those countries provide nearly 90 percent of America's imported shrimp. Interestingly, Ecuador's shrimp industry exists almost entirely to supply U.S. demand, with over 93 percent of its shrimp coming up north to the U.S. The vast majority of those shrimp (almost 90 percent) are farmed. Sadly, shrimp production is responsible for the destruction of 70 percent of Ecuador's mangroves. Farming practices in other countries range from decent to awful, but there's currently no real way for a consumer to tell whether shrimp from any particular country was farmed sustainably or not.
Geoff Shester, senior science manager of Monterey Bay's Seafood Watch, says that ethical shrimp consumption is a chicken and egg problem. On one hand, the solution is for consumers to show demand for responsibly farmed and wild shrimp by eating it but on the other hand, ethical shrimp choices are not yet widely available. Seafood Watch is working with some of the largest seafood buyers in the U.S. to help them buy better shrimp, but it's currently a major challenge.
The first challenge is that labeling and certification programs do not yet exist to identify which farmed shrimp meet sustainable production standards. The second challenge is that even when such programs are in place, the U.S. demand will likely greatly exceed their supply.
Shester's advice to consumers right now is "only buy shrimp that you know comes from a sustainable source. If you can't tell for sure, try something else from the Seafood Watch yellow or green lists." Knowing that many will be unwilling to give up America's favorite seafood, he advocates simply eating less of it and keeping an eye on future updates to the Seafood Watch guide to eating sustainable seafood.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


39 Comments so far
Show AllEat shrimp or shellfish ( unless you yourself harvest it in pristine waters) you will eventually be made ill.
Um... last time I checked, we will all 'eventually' be made ill regardless of whether we eat seafood or not!
We are all just walking around looking for the disease that will 'eventually' kill us.
@Lilly the Pill,
That's so true, it's frightening. Veg or Semi-Vegan is the way to go. Boycott all Beef (especially from Texas!; No adequate FDA USDA inspectors thanks to the bushmonkey), eat nothing processed by the hand of man. If it's processed at all, A CEO somewhere is hell-bent on long shelf-life, and heavy pesticides and preservatives to reduce spoilage in transit.
GMO produce as well, is geared to leech pesticides by bacteria genes long after you've swallowed it. Tests with rats have confirmed gene swapping with the natural bacteria in your gut producing chromosome damage (i.e. cancer) at slightly higher concentrations than what you put in your mouth.
MonInsanto is going to kill us all if we don't break it up into a million pecies. All JMHO's.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
Sioux Rose
T.J. Nice to see you back posting!
I realize that all the monkeying around with genetics HAS to impact OUR bodies, and it would seem that perhaps we can, for the time being withstand it; but genetic weaknesses are apt to show up in future generations. I could picture survivors of this Monsanto-make-war against persons and nature era as having grotesque deformities. It makes one wonder if the medical branch of disaster capitalism is not drooling over this option, considering all the profit to be made from necessary plastic surgeries?
I had to return to the dentist this week and this time she had a specialist. Since my experience last April I have been waiting to find out if I "qualify" for a single implant. I resented that this dentist insisted that BY LAW she had to X-ray my entire mouth, and then I went for the scaling & planing. 50% of persons over 50 are told they have periodontal DISEASE, but if 50 percent of a population has something, I think of it more as a condition. Doctors told my 85 year old father he had the DISEASE of Leukemia. He was coming to the natural conclusion of his life; however, by defining his cessation of vitality as a disease, the doctors were able to milk income from all kinds of invasive procedures there to presumably extend his mortality.
In any case, the little dental duo thought they'd turn me into another cash cow by prescribing all kinds of treatment except what I was there to get. I let them have it... and walked out. Too many in this country are treated for Diabetes when major dietary changes could offset the damage done by fast food, artificial fillers and all the other excuses-for-nutrition that are causing an epidemic of this condition. I think it's that way with cancer, too; although our living tissues are under almost constant attack by so many artificial chemicals, deadly ones, that are routinely released into the air, soil, and water. These molecules BECOME us, and they are a direct threat to the body's homeostasis. The medical model is one of fighting the natural, and therefore compromising our innate cellular structures all in the interest of utilizing chemical "cures." These tend to mask symptoms without ever remedying CAUSE, and the methods turn the body into another war-field, a perfect extension of the Mars rules model that has eviscerated so much of our culture, championing war as its apex of achievement, and claiming the entitlement of too much of the nation's treasury to serve that dasdardly ends.
When times get this bad and off center, you know the pendulum HAS to soon turn in the OTHER direction. Let there be Light to pierce the atmopshere, although many apear to be courting another Dark Age.
"When times get this bad and off center, you know the pendulum HAS to soon turn in the OTHER direction. Let there be Light to pierce the atmosphere, although many appear to be courting another Dark Age."
Hi Sioux Rose,
For some reason, that brought to mind Poe's "The Pit and The Pendulum," with the pendulum, indeed, swinging back and forth, but with each swing, the blade gets lower, and lower, and closer and closer...
Which also seems to be a sign of our times.
Steve
Hi Sioux Rose!
Hope you see this. I was gone a few days out of internet coverage: looking at coral atols and mountain rice terraces. Wanted to see them before they're all gone. Sorry to hear about the dental scam. I've had fillings ordered that dentist #2 said were unnecessary and he had them cancelled. Makes me wonder if #1, the Russian Jawbreaker was just trying to generate revenue..... They xray the chit out of me every time I walk through the door. More billing that my plan doesn't cover.
Who can you trust anymore?
One thing I am suspicious of is the "Early Screening" that some doctors say removes heathy organs since "large cell syndrome" can imitate cancer but the screening assay cannot differentiate between non-malignant LSS and Cancer. IIRC, up to 70 percent of Mastectomies are needless according to some in the industry. Yikes!
Maybe it's better to just eat five servings of tropical friut and veggies a day and not live near any nuke plants... and stay out of hospitals to steer clear of staph infections...
War inside the body, outside the body, near the body..... I'm starting to feel like Yossarian in Catch-22! GET Me out of here!
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
When I saw the title, the first names that came to mind were India and Thailand. I've seen and read about the environmental damage that shrimp 'farming' does to the coastal regions in these countries, while the benefits of exports go only to a few businessmen. People really have to stop and ask - where all this seafood is coming from. Seafood was available mostly in coastal regions in the past. We like to condemn Japan for the killing of whales. Running seafood restaurants all over the country, with deals like 'all-you-can-eat' and such, is possible ONLY through the relentless exploitation of resources in faraway lands and oceans, and it's totally unsustainable. This addiction to seafood is directly responsible for foreign vessels fishing in coastal regions of faraway lands, directly in conflict with the local fisher folk, driving *them* out of business.
You said the magic words: as I get older. As we all get older the wisest choice is to switch from a meat-based diet to a vegetarian one for our own sake and the environment's. But such a switch will cost more $$$'s because the cost of organic foods are skyrocketing at outlets like Whole Paycheck (aka Whole Foods). This might be a form of forced population control. Those with the $$$'s and the desire to live longer will be able to afford a more exclusive diet, while those in poverty will continue their unhealthy eating habits out of necessity and die off earlier. A warped, economy-driven Darwinian survival of the richest.
Buttwhole Foods is a cruel joke. Very little of their greenwashed crap is devoid of GMO and pesticide as Federal standards allow 10 percent of man made chemicals in the so-called "organic" label; all courtesy of Crawford, the Bushmonkey's puppet who he put in charge of FDA. But even if Buttwhole uses 100 percent GMO and calls it Organic the fines and enforcement are chump change compared to the billions conned out of the public for food that is largely the same as generic processed poison.
All JMHO's and I could be wrong,
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
About 15 years ago I looked at printed material for a fishing license in the state of California - the first time I had done so in several decades.
They had limits of how many caught fish one might eat, supposedly without fear of metals and other poisoning. The limits varied from place to place, depending, as nearly as I could surmise, on the watershed.
Gee, I wondered, if I can't eat three of these without fear of poisoning, why is it that I want to eat the first?
Fish caught in the ocean were, not surprisingly, limited as well.
The next time I went to the store, I asked myself what the odds were the fish there were caught in different waters.
Uuf.
I printed the guide, but how can anyone tell where the seafood comes from?
It's not always easy, but I've noticed lately that a lot of the good in the grocery stores that I go to country of origin is right there, even on the "fresh" stuff. Of course, if you eat out it's all up for grabs. It's quite an eye-opener, though, looking at these labels. If you're 50 or older you have memories of when food was so much better than it is today. It's incredibly sad.
It's not just shrimp, it's agribusiness all over. Start growing something yourself, and eat locally. Half of CO2 production is connected to agribusiness practices. A smaller, more local world is the direction we're going in of necessity. Go now. It'll feel like you're doing something because you are.
No matter what one's style of eating there is, whether people are vegetarians or omnivores (eating everything), there's no such thing as a free lunch. Any which way you turn, there's always something about the way in which something is grown, cultivated and raised that has the potential to do harm in some way or other, ranging from minor digestive discomfort to cancer, to paralysis, and even death.
Oh, how I enjoyed eating mammals, birds, and sealife! For real, I enjoyed every tender, succulent, greasy, mouth-watering morsel on the tip of my fork.
I've been vegetarian 35+ years and 99.999% vegan for about 5+ years, and enjoy food and dishes of various cuisines more now than ever before because it tastes so much better, is better for health, better for the other earthlings, and better for the Earth. And I don't miss what I used to eat before at all. Shrimp, bacon, ham and eggs, roast beef, grilled chicken, etc, etc, etc -- don't miss it at all. Not a problem.
rodent,
You've cracked the code. We evolved from a rodent like creature who's omnivore gut digested mostly roots and veggies and occasionally opportunistic carrion and rarely, live animals. I feel a million times better, my movements are smooth and brief since I swore off all processed food esp. beef, pork and anything that comes from a big company.
When someone slides ham or beef under my nose now, I literally wretch (no doubt, mentally, from the knowledge of Big Ag Shitfarm/antibiotic Slaughterhouse practices.)
Fish is important to lubricate heart valves in moderation, as is Red Wine to prevent cardiovascular disease. The French and Japanese haven't suffered those pitfalls in the past due largely to diet.
The biggest killers for Homo Sapiens is:
1. Heart Attack
2. Cancer
3. Stroke
Terrorism is nowhere on the list even hundreds of entries down. Bin Laden (brother partnered with GWB in Abusto Energy) is not a credible threat, however we spend trillions pretending Al Quieda is dangerous. The FBI has never had Osama on the top ten wanted list because they say there's no connection to him and 911. Our real enemy is MonInsanto and Big Ag. They are the ones killing us statistically and getting us into foreign wars like United Fruit Company (Bushes again) in Honduras.
Boycott em!
The above is all just my opinion only.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
LOOK UP "CONFESSIONS OF AN ECONOMIC HIT MAN BY JOHN PERKINS ON WIKI
Good points, TJ, and no need for the disclaimer that it's all just your opinion :)
The whole planet has been destroyed. The problem is to many people. It dosen't matter if you don't eat meat, or just only eat vegetables. I think Mother Nature is cooking up something to rid the place of the only living thing that fouls its own nest. Good Luck glad I'm the age I am and at max only have about 10 years left here...
Same here. I wish those under 40 luck because they're gonna need it.
I'm walking around repelling the disease that wants to kill me.
Gee, are you talking about the Democrats or the Republicans?
Well, folks, I hate to break this to you. It looks cannibalism is going to be the best earth-friendly source of protein for the human species. It solves both over-population and nutrition problems.
Now, all you folks who believe Obama is a socialist born in Kenya please follow the yellow line...
I’m kidding, of course. But what would it take for the Neocons, Birthers and Deathers to decide their interests would be in this direction? They already have no conscience about killing human beings over lies and oil.
most humans probably arent very nutritious either... filled with pharmaceuticals, antibiotics, pesticides, and not much nutrients... i'll stick with vegetarianism.
shrimp eat shit.
'nuff said.
Watch Food Inc. and tell me that most Americans don't eat much better.
most Americans will swallow anything.
What else can't we eat?
Don't eat chocolate, don't eat sugar, don't eat dairy, don't eat tomatoes from this country, don't eat lettuce that comes from here...
It's maddening really.
I think I have shrimp once a year.
Maybe I should sack it all and buy a farm or something.
I'm sorry, but the whole food thing just drives me batty. No matter what you're eating, it's bad for you or someone or something is harmed by it, so you're told.
If I buy a tomato, I'm exploiting someone because the person that picked it got paid $2 an hour.
I really refuse to believe there isn't a better way to harvest and produce food.
>>>thegreatrockyhill: I really refuse to believe there isn't a better way to harvest and produce food.
I'm with you on that. But the food production and distribution system is so taken over by the capitalist system, fighting back may not be easy. But the first step is in understanding the system, even if you cannot always do much about it right away. You mention the plight of the tomato pickers. Some of them are starting to demand fair wages - so those of us who are in a position to lend support in any form - directly or through publicizing - could do our part. Working in a slaughterhouse can't be much fun either. If someone wants to quit his job there, he should be able to find another job. It's not easy.
The importance of articles like these is in exposing what lies beneath the surface. We cannot go on with the idea "ignorance is bliss" or "out of sight, out of mind". We HAVE TO know where our food comes from and what the implications of its production and consumption are. For that, you may have to do a bit of homework - because whatever "information" and "education" you get from mainstream media or even the mainstream medical establishment on health and nutrition may already be tainted by other considerations. And those slick TV ads for fast-food or seafood restaurants can't be of much help, either.
That doesn't mean being a vegan or a vegetarian, for example, has to be a chore or a struggle. There is much to discover AND relish by way of dishes from all over the world - dishes that don't use meat, seafood or even dairy. If you enjoy a bit of spicy food every now and then, life can be even more fun. Cooking and eating (and occasionally entertaining guests) can be a joy - not to mention, healthy too.
You have to yank control of your local economy back from far-flung elites, and their local lackeys. Specifically you decide in your mind to reallocate your resources, directing a greater percentage of your budget to food. This provides the fair deal for your local independent farmer. This is the demand that YOU consciously create for the production that enables your local independent farmer to stay in business. More specifically, you allocate a demand, and respect, for the extra labor required to grow healthy food sustainably. This is YOUR economy, built/controlled by YOUR hand. It becomes YOUR asset, and you defend it, by refusing "cheap" imports from DAS KAPITAL!!!!
Now Das Kapital, believe it or not, actually has a function: To keep our local independent farmers, craftsmen and merchants honest. Here's how you explain the policy to your local farmer: "You know, I want to do my business with you, even though Das Kapital is perpetually circling overhead dropping tempting treats on the ground. If we don't keep this exchange loop between us running well, then what? Then slavery for both of us to... DAS KAPITAL!!!!!!!"
>>>rtdrury wrote: You have to yank control of your local economy back from far-flung elites, and their local lackeys.
Yup - "far-flung elites, and their local lackeys" - that's how the system works. Some of the produce imports don't even make any sense - things that can be grown locally are imported, and sometimes from countries that already have too many people and not enough fresh water supplies - unless of course if you look at it purely from profits point of view, and ignore all the shipping and the environmental damage.
If you look at the situation of the farmers in developing countries, they no longer have much control of what they produce, how much they get paid, etc. They get paid barely enough to survive. The elite who control the system can increase or decrease imports - just so that the city-dwelling, salaried class can keep spending a much smaller portion of their income on food, compared to the rural folk who actually produce the food. These imports are sometimes from rich countries where the farmers get subsidies. While a farmer in the USA, Canada or the EU countries may have his own grievances, they pale in comparison to the situation of his counterpart in a poorer country.
Even though farmers and NGOs in India are opposed to GM crops, and for a while the government appears to take their views into consideration, permission is eventually granted for one GM crop after another. I mention India because these corporations have a global reach, and it's going to be one helluva sustained fight to get back the control of something so vital as the food we eat. When I tell people to not spend so much time on mindless entertainment on TV some of them seem to think, "yeah yeah yeah....", not realizing that it's this kind of distraction by trivialities that allowed so much to slip out of control, and so many warnings got ignored.
I agree - we need to do more to support the local independent farmer.
I understand Alcyon. I'm not suggesting at all that these stories should remain buried and that people shouldn't be mindful of where their food comes from. It just seems like EVERYTHING we consume to live is tainted by something. It's so frustrating.
"That doesn't mean being a vegan or a vegetarian, for example, has to be a chore or a struggle."
Easier said than done. lol.
Oh I did have a meat-free lunch the other day. Do eggs count?
But even the fruits and veggies are tainted; be it with pesticides or unfair labor practices.
Wasn't there an article here on CD last year around this time about chocolate, and how that's made via exploitation?
No matter where you turn, something is to be boycotted.
I mean, I can get by without shrimp. It's not a huge part of my diet. As I said, I only have it occasionally anyway.
I just keep wondering what else I won't be able to have.
What about water? I don't feel safe drinking that sometimes.
Maddening. How can it not be?
you forgot to blame Bush, Cheney, Palin, and Rush!
bottom feeders all.
God hates shrimp eaters even more than "the gay" and polyester
Read leviticus it you want a laugh.
I eat shrimp about once a month as a treat and this article isn't going to change that. From your descriptions, it's no worse than non-free range meat, or pesticide laced Mexican vegetables.
Yeah, I'm not pleased shrimp isn't healthier, and if there were obvious 'organic' shrimp on the market, I'd go for those instead.
Sticking strictly to the shrimp and seafood issue:
I went to download the SeaWatch list and am now completely confused. Some U.S. farmed fish are the green choice? I thought fish farms in general caused pollution and damaged the ecosystem (like the shrimp described in the story). So how is that a good choice?
And some of the seafood that was recommended comes from thousands of miles away. What about the effect of transporting it to us here in the midwest?
My MY MY, I guess nothing ever changes, seems anyone will write about anything to make a buck. The author of the above article who is simply repeating what hes read that was written by other mis-informed and half educated dim-wits who dont have a clue as to what their talking about. I have been a shrimper for 25 years and I wonder where these people get their information????? Do people really think we are destroying the coral reefs and ocean bottoms. Are we useing blasting powder and rock moveing equipment to catch a lil ol shrimp. No we are not. WE use very lightweight and fragile netting that is very expensive. the last thing we want is to tear them to shreads ,thus the reason for the hi-tec equipment. As for by catch we are forced by law to install devices in our nets that reduces our by catch to about 1 tenth of what was said in your aritical. Football field sized nets???? get real. Do you also thing we own tractor-trailer rigs to carry these nets around,?? NO. I own one of the largest shrimp boats in the gulf and the average net size is only 25 to 50 feet. PLEASE>LEARN BEFOR YOU BURN...........