Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Speaking Truth to Power
There's a phrase originating with the peace activism of the American Quaker movement: "Speak Truth to Power." One can hardly speak more directly to power than addressing the Presidential Administration of the United States. This past October, students at Islamabad's Islamic International University had a message for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. One student summed up many of her colleagues' frustration. "We don't need America," she said. "Things were better before they came here."
The students were mourning loss of life at their University where, a week earlier, two suicide bombers walked onto the campus wearing explosive devices and left seven students dead and dozens of others seriously injured. Since the spring of 2009, under pressure from U.S. leaders to "do more" to dislodge militant Taliban groups, the Pakistani government has been waging military offensives throughout the northwest of the country. These bombing attacks have displaced millions and the Pakistani government has apparently given open permission for similar attacks by unmanned U.S. aerial drones. Every week, Pakistani militant groups have launched a new retaliatory atrocity in Pakistan, killing hundreds more civilians in markets, schools, government buildings, mosques and sports facilities. Who can blame the student who believed that her family and friends were better off before the U.S. began insisting that Pakistan cooperate with U.S. military goals in the region?
In neighboring Afghanistan, 2009 was the deadliest year for Afghan children since 2001, according to the Afghanistan Rights Monitor. In a January 6 statement, the group noted that in 2009 about 1050 children had died in suicide attacks, roadside blasts, air strikes and the cross-fire between Taliban insurgents and pro-government forces, both Afghan and foreign. The group's director, Ajmal Samadi, noted that this figure amounted to nearly three children per day. It's estimated that nearly one third of these children's deaths were caused by US/NATO coalition forces. This week, hundreds of Afghans have taken to the streets in protest after the Afghan government said its investigation has established that all 10 people killed by U.S. led forces on January 3rd, in a remote village in Kunar province, were civilians and that eight of those killed were schoolchildren, aged 12-14. The London Times reports that the U.S.-led troops were accused of dragging the innocent children from their beds, handcuffing several of them, and then killing all eight of them.
Stories of carnage, horror and impoverishment aren't new in Iraq, Afghanistan, or Pakistan. Ten years ago, each of these countries suffered under severely repressive governance and extremes of poverty. In the case of Iraq, these conditions were made immeasurably worse by U.S.-imposed economic sanctions that punished innocent Iraqi citizens for their inability to rise from under Saddam Hussein's brutal regime, all the while rendering them completely dependent on Hussein's regime to meet their basic survival needs. Yet in all this suffering that preceded the U.S. invasions of the region, there were very few accounts of suicide bombings in the lands where the U.S. is now at war. The kidnapping and torture industries, now rife in all three countries, had not developed, and their entire economies had not been hobbled by blatant official corruption.
What has U.S. invasion and occupation unleashed in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan? And how are these wars creating security for U.S. people?
The New York Times reported on November 14, 2009 that, according to internal U.S. government estimates, it costs one million dollars to keep one soldier in Afghanistan for one year. Consider this sum in light of the fact that, in Afghanistan, district governors earn 70 dollars per month. Their operation budget is 15 dollars per month, and half of them have no dedicated office. Or, in light of the UN estimate that the Gross Domestic Product, per capita, in Afghanistan, is less than $1,000 per year. Or that The United Nation's Children's Fund, better known as UNICEF, says Afghanistan is the worst place in the world to be born, having the highest infant mortality rate in the world with 257 deaths per 1,000 live births. Only 70 percent of Afghans have access to clean water.
Kai Eide, the outgoing Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for Afghanistan, briefed the UN Security Council on January 5, 2010. With regard to military activities, he bluntly stated that "civilian casualties, house searches, and detention policies are sources of recruitment for the insurgency."
President Obama's administration is soon expected to request another "emergency" supplemental expenditure for the Iraq and Afghan wars, this time for between 40 and 50 billion dollars. If (some would say, when) this figure is approved, it will make 2010 fiscally the most costly year of the ongoing War on Terror, surpassing President Bush's expenditures by a significant margin. Before the year is out, President Obama will also have submitted a budget item to fund the wars in 2011, with military services already planning to request something in the range of $160 to $165 billion.
The U.S. Constitution states that Congress shall make no law to
abridge the right of people to assemble peaceably for redress of
grievance. We are deeply aggrieved by the folly of these wars. Our
right to free speech is irrelevant if we don't exercise it, and so we
intend to raise the lament of those who bear the brunt of our wars but
whose voices seldom reach U.S. government figures.
For two weeks this January, leading up to the date when President Obama
is due to submit his budget for Fiscal Year 2011 to Congress, Voices
for Creative Nonviolence and friends will gather in Washington D.C. for
a "Peaceable Assembly Campaign" project.
(www.
We'll be meeting with elected representatives to raise questions about the folly and the crime of war, holding daily vigils at the White House, and engaging in acts of nonviolent civil disobedience to emphasize our refusal to cooperate with the war makers.
Please join us in this year-long campaign, whether in Washington D.C. this month, or participating locally where you live. Visit the Voices website, www.vcnv.org, to learn more about ways to become involved, both locally through this coming summer and in the Days of Resistance in Washington.
We'll be there from January 19th through February 2nd.




17 Comments so far
Show AllMy favorite bumper sticker is: You can bomb the world to pieces but you cannot bomb the world to peace. Jesus also said: " All those that take up the sword will die by the sword". So I guess the modern translation would be: All those who bomb other countries will die by the bomb.
Simply eloquent words that reveal pure truth; violence creates more violence. The "war on terror" inspires more war and the warriors become terrorists themselves.
It is horrifying to me that my country, in my name, is the most egregious war machine on a fragile and struggling planet. It is the responsibility of citizens to change this. We have to get to work to end this murdurous insanity. Silence and passivity are complicit with violence.
Thanks to Kathy Kelly, the legitimate Nobel peace recipient.
HORRIFYING is indeed the appropriate term to describe our so-called "WAR ON TERROR!!!"
What we are doing to other countries/people in the name of the WAR ON TERROR is unforgiveable!
"in my name"
only so long as you think of yourself as an American.
liberate yourself - join the world.
"The New York Times reported on November 14, 2009 that, according to internal U.S. government estimates, it costs one million dollars to keep one soldier in Afghanistan for one year. Consider this sum in light of the fact that, in Afghanistan, district governors earn 70 dollars per month. Their operation budget is 15 dollars per month, and half of them have no dedicated office. Or, in light of the UN estimate that the Gross Domestic Product, per capita, in Afghanistan, is less than $1,000 per year. Or that The United Nation's Children's Fund, better known as UNICEF, says Afghanistan is the worst place in the world to be born, having the highest infant mortality rate in the world with 257 deaths per 1,000 live births. Only 70 percent of Afghans have access to clean water."
Most Americans have no concern for "collateral damage", but they are motivated by the $$$.
When a wonderful lady like Kathy Kelly, that is a REAL PEACEMAKER does not even get nominated for the Noble Peace Prize and a war mongering phony like Obomba is rewarded the prize, it tells us the prize has nothing to do with peace and should be called: The Orwellian Peace Prize!
students . . . had a message for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. One student summed up many of her colleagues' frustration. "We don't need America," she said. "Things were better before they came here."
And we Americans don't need America either, if you define America as this completely fucked up, totally heartless system that is undeniably destroying all our lives.
Bring America Back !!!!
****May the Force be with Kathy Kelly and her VCNV group, as she brings the "Truth" to the corrupt Powers of DC !!
****She should be cautioned again that Team Obama proved just as willing as King George to use Jackboot force and violence against campaign protest groups at the last election.
****Team Obama has already proven that they have no concept of what the word "Peace" means. They have given, by their abject Silence, tacit approval to Zion's Genocide at Gaza of 1500 human beings, including 300 innocent helpless children.
Peace is a language Team Obama does not understand, nor do they want to !!! Rather than blunting the DC Culture of Corruption as heavily promised, they have become part and parcel of the military industrial complex, and they do it's
bidding.
If they cannot shed open tears for 300 dead children,
then , Kathy, what can they cry for ???? Good Luck !
speak truth to power I am totally done with this cliche. So let us change it. Power will always overcome truth. Always.
That's absurd. Perhaps you meant "Power will always overcome those who speak the truth". Either way, in the long-term, there is only truth. The "power" you speak of ultimately destroys the wielder. Always has, always will. Sit back and watch.
"Sit back and watch."
Yeah...that's effective activism. Jaysis!
"...in the long-term, there is only truth."
Is this not existentialism?
Both of the above in my mind, represent some of the most horrendous ideology in progressive/leftist thought. Both have the luxury of doing nothing to change anything - they are risk free - and at the same time allow the practitioner to somehow feel morally superior or pure in their praxis.
Are these not variations on a theme of pacifism - Jesus/Gandhi?
The whole notion that "evil always loses to good" is sheer delusion, unless you look forward - far reaching - to "the long-term" which really means, after humans and all they have killed are extinct. Then the truth will still be truth. Life will be life and continue....in a universal way at any rate. That's marvelous....
But how is it helpful to those who are suffering RIGHT FUCKING NOW?
"The "power" you speak of ultimately destroys the wielder."
Yeah yeah yeah....fooksake! People are like broken records around here. "He who lives by the sword dies by the sword" as quoted by the fictitious Jesus figure. Yeah that's deep.::Coughs::
Quoting fictional or delude pacifists isn't doing jack shit.
"Sit back and watch"? We're so doomed...
Kelly is to be congratulated for her efforts and a fine article. America the war-monger, the biggest supplier of munitions and war equipment, the assassin of democratically elected leaders and reformers, the spoiler of the planet and greatest force for evil on the planet.
Yet inhabited by largely decent and good people.
How to explain this dichotomy?
■Is it all the Fawning Corporate Media's (FCM) [from "Answering Helen Thomas on Why They Want to Harm Us" by Ray McGovern] fault?
■Is it our education system seeming stuck in the 1950's with regard to identifying America's real role in the world?
■Is it our parents, so caught up in their daily rat-races to give a damn what their government does in their name, let alone teach their kids to think?
■Is it us, focused on mediocre music via our i-pods, watching internet porn (come on -- admit it), and playing violent video games?
■Or is there more going on?
Gary
Thank you Kathy Kelly for witnessing for justice and peace. I shall join you and demonstrate locally as always. I wish you success.
I have this great idea now that the Avatar movie has become so widely popular and reversed the good guy--bad guy roles. (The militarists who are stealing resources are the bad guys in the movie while the indigenous are the good guys. The plot is very similar to the old Tarzan and Pocahontas plots.) What do you think of making some big papier mache Avatar puppets to stand in front of the White House the night Obama asks for more money for bombing these countries?
Thanks Kathy you are still the best you know? And you really are making a difference.
"Speaking truth to power..."
"...as though power doesn't know what it's doing."
-Ward Churchill