Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Real Top Ten Stories of the Past Decade
The media are awash with talking heads bloviating about the top stories of the last decade. The wired-in society. The growth of organic food. The new frugality. This is the ritual that reveals their true function in the culture: pacification. It's their way of signaling the masses that Bigger Thinkers are looking after things, so go back to your Wii or Survivor or Facebook reveries.
The amazing thing is how little is ever mentioned about the stories that really mattered, those that affected the very nature of our society, its institutions, and the relation of the people to their state and society.
Those stories paint a picture of danger, of a people who have lost control of their government and the corporations that own it. But you'll hear nary a word about such difficult truths from any storyteller in the conventional media.
So here, in no particular order, are my Top Ten Stories of the Naughties, the ones that really matter.
- The Supreme Court hijacking the 2000 presidential election. This isn't even a historical controversy anymore. Al Gore won the national popular vote by 570,000. And we now know he would have won the Florida vote as well if the vote counting had not been stopped by the Supreme Court. This was literally a right wing judicial coup d' etat, so it's understandable that it's never mentioned in the "right" kind of circles.
- Bush knew of 9/11 long before it actually happened. Three years before Bush took office, the neo-cons' Project For a New American Century called for a "new Pearl Harbor" to galvanize the nation into a war to seize Middle East oil. And even before the event itself, Bush-as-president was warned dozens of times of the imminent attack, the most notorious being the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing titled, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S". Amazingly nothing was done to prevent the attack. But even less is it advertised that Bush knew.
- Iraq was all premised on lies, yet we're still there. Saddam Hussein wasn't pursuing Weapons of Mass Destruction. He wasn't involved in 9/11. He wasn't engaged with Al Qaeda. As with the 2000 election hijacking, we know all these things. And we know they were false at the time they were proffered. Yet, there we are, with no intent to leave, our very presence spitting in the face of International Law and the international community we so unctuously pretend to respect.
- The Global War on Terror. Or more specifically, the ease with which the "GWOT" has replaced the Cold War as the justification for the ever-increasing militarization of society. What happened to the post-Cold War "Peace Dividend"? The U.S continues to spend more on the military than all the rest of the world combined. It continues to maintain over 700 military bases around the world. And it continues to manufacture excuses for foreign interventions whenever weapons makers and military logistics companies need more profits — which is forever.
- The fact that 2/3 of all economic growth went to top 1%. John Kennedy's social contract had a rising tide lifting all boats. But over the last decade 2/3 of all economic growth has gone to the top 1% of income earners. Meanwhile the middle class has suffered a $13 trillion writedown in wealth as a result of the housing collapse. The banking bailout and the health care "reform" debate showed as never before the extent to which corporations have captured government and use it to redirect national wealth to themselves and their owners.
- The Neo-Feudalization of the American economy. The top 1% of wealth holders own 41% of all the assets in the country while the bottom 40% own absolutely nothing. Meanwhile, workers are saddled with $12 trillion of national debt, an effective indentured servitude that will bind them to their corporate masters for the rest of their lives. This is the working definition of feudalism, where the rich own everything and everybody else has nothing but their proffered labor and their obligations to their masters. The Hapsburgs, the Tudors, and the Bourbons would be jealous.
- The surrender of civil liberties. Despite the Fourth Amendment supposedly protecting us against unreasonable searches and seizures, the government can now read your email and listen to your phone calls without any probable cause. The Obama administration has gone to court to prevent the re-institution of Habeas Corpus, suspended during the Bush administration. We are much less free, much less protected from brutalization by our own government than we were just ten years ago.
- The failure of "the free market" to sustain prosperity. The "free market" has long been an ideological dodge used to resist real government regulation of the economy. Still, the ideal was supposed to deliver prosperity in a stable, sustainable matter. Now we have the greatest global economic collapse since the Great Depression, with the government transferring $11 trillion to the banks to cover their sociopathically greedy bets that went bust. All in the name of deregulation, with future regulation vigorously resisted. Is this a deranged country or what?
- The collapse of the media. We once imagined it would guard the hen house. Yet that was an anomaly, a freak event around Vietnam and Watergate when it slipped its leash. Since then, sixty independent media outlets have consolidated into five, all retailing the ideology of the powerful, the perpetrators, laundering their lies, covering up the truth, and harassing the truth tellers. In every story mentioned above, the mainstream media have worked to ensure that the people didn't know the truth about the forfeiture of their government, their wealth, their security, and their rights.
- The meaninglessness of elections. This is the most embittering revelation of all. Despite the greatest electoral majority since Johnson crushed Goldwater in '64, Barrack Obama has betrayed everything he ran on. In every case where he had the opportunity to confront power — in financial bailouts, financial regulation, health care, wars and military spending, utilities and global warming, national surveillance — Obama has sided with the rich and powerful against the interests of the American people. He has probably engendered more cynicism, more disaffection with government than any president since Richard Nixon. It will deal a staggering blow to the hopes of mobilizing masses of people again for a real takeback of government. And he's not even one year into it.
History paints decades with broad brushes-the Roaring Twenties, The Depression, World War II. Historians will look back on the Naughts as the time when Americans Lost Their Country. It was the decade when all the institutions that they believed would protect them — the media, the courts, Congress, the market, a messianic new president — in fact betrayed them. It will forever more be a different country.
But not just yet. Did I tell you about the big move to locally-grown produce?
- Posted in




173 Comments so far
Show AllI like the number 10, the meaningless of elections. The last time I voted was in 2004 and I've regretted it ever since. I will never again contribute to this phony democracy.
After Obama's "change you can believe in" BS the absolute meaninglessness of it all should be as apparent as a blow to the head with a ball bat to anyone who is paying attention.
"Meaningless," -- anything but. The meaninfulness was hijacked by the corporate state, as usual, but the desire for change and the hope for the future were real.
What is meaningless is throwing up our hands as we gripe about the uselessness of doing anything because the game is fixed. Well in a fixed game we can always shoot the dealer folks. It might come to that, if we got the guts to pull the trigger.
Gary
Well put, Gary! Freeman's #10 is mis-labelled in terms of what he wrote under that head, which was precisely the failure of Obama to deliver almost anything he promised (or allowed his followers to imagine he promised) in the year since HIS election. That election was not meaningless, it was fraudulent; in fact was the real "stolen" election in the sense that the outcome was accomplished under false pretenses. It will be an utterly horrible consequence of that mistake if people extrapolated from the failure of this election, the meaningless of all elections. And yet too many are ready to do just that, saying it really doesn't matter who is elected, it's the "movement" of public demands that moves real change, blah, blah. To take this tack is to give up on truly free elections when they have not even been tried. It is possible---and that means we must strive to do it---to rescue the meaningfulness of our elections, to wrest control of them from the corporate powers with their image-makers and their kept presses and throw our support to candidates who will support "us" and not "them." If you object that there are not enough of "us," I say you are unnecessarily restricting the pool of political activists to the "usual suspects" who base their votes on the charm and appearance of media-groomed candidates, and are leaving in a vast pool of the turned off and unturned out all those people who are smart enough (and desperate enough) to know that they are being manipulated in these "meaningless" elections in which they are given choices of the empty suits or skirts whom the corporations and their media appendages offer as "electable" candidates. We must seek, find, and get registered and turned out these disfranchised ones and hammer away with the electability mantra of Dennis Kucinich: "Can I be elected? Yes, if you will vote for me." These decisions are within the power of the people, but of course the trick is getting the people organized. I didn't say it would be easy, but it would be possible and therefore I would feel mandated to work to do this all-important "right thing." (If I made New Year's resolutions, I think this would be it.)
And well put Jerry! The one thing that seems to get everyone's goat is the fact that our congressmotherfuckers and token preznit sell out to corporate America and big finance for campaign contributions. Well, if we can get people to get off their dead asses and actually follow what the candidates up for election actually do rather than what they say they will do in their television ads that have been paid for by these illicit campaign contribution, they will be beat at their own game. If they don't perform and people who vote realize that and in turn vote for someone who will actually represent their constituents, the amount of money they have in their campaign coffers is irrelevant. They will have sold out for nothing! A win/win if there ever was one!!!
aussiedawg: my feelings exactly. In my state (Florida) a politician (Lawton Chiles) once won the governorship essentially by "walking across" the state in a low budget campaign. Under-funded candidates can actually run AGAINST the money, making their opponents' well-heeled campaigns an issue of the campaign itself. As you say, the failure of more candidates to do this is partly a matter of laziness and lack of tactical creativity. I'm all in favor of well-crafted campaigning, and the craft of campaignmanship should be as well practiced on the left as on the right side of the political spectrum: an attitude not of "anything it takes" to win an election, but of full use of all tactics consistent with your political ideology.
Don't let the pundits fool you, people CAN sue city hall and win. We did so locally when the water company (controlled by the county seat) raised our water rates arbitrarily without a public meeting. We proved fraud and lowered the rates. So too can people win against the odds and what is predicted -- think of the grin on Truman's face as he helt up a newspaper headlie proclaiming Dewey won. Not hardly, because Harry worked his tail off on those trains.
Helplessness is the greated foil of the corporate state. Don't vote (and most do not). Don't join together. Don't fight the state. Don't.
Well do folks, DO!
Gary
I can go with that. However, I think it puts that much more pressure on us to do something outside of the political process. Doing nothing is a luxury we can't afford.
Amerika is not alone. Canada as always is along for the ride. Our gov't treats us like mushrooms-in the dark and fed all kinds of b.s. Trouble is, most people like it. Some wonder about the body bags coming home from Afghanistan, but,hey, we support the troops too much to question the legitimacy of the operation. Besides, there is a good hockey game in Boston today so why waste time over democracy.
Even though we are along for the ride we don't hide the body bags. The hearses roll down the "Highway of Heroes"/"Highway of Death" from Trenton CFB to Toronto with each return and make the news, keeping us aware of the costs of Afghanistan.
Incredibly the pip-squeak has prorogued Parliament yet again. Although legal it smacks of the new unconstitutional anti-democratic US laws. I'm going to write Peter MacKay (copy to his highness SH) again demanding a judical enquiry into the transfer of Afghanistan prisoners for torture and to demand the Parliamentary Committee be reconstituted. While my letter doesn't do much, their aides use such communications as a whole to measure the mood of the country. We should not let them get away unscathed over torture-gate.
All ten points revolve around one central issue which is the defining characteristic of our times: the growth of unchecked corporate power through the militarization of every aspect of our lives.
q
War is good for America. Peace is bad for America.
Since we never seem to have actually had an extended period of peace in this country how would you know?
Gary
You've hit the nail on the head. Since Reagan (and likely before that) the wealthy owners of this country have felt that they can do as they please without repercussions. They have bought the TV networks to condition the sheep to accept whatever our owners give us. All of the items in the above list boil down to this single cause.
Now, go out and eat more corn syrup-based products, gain more weight, become more lethargic, and remain or become more ignorant...it's what your owners want from you.
A perfect 10 : the DEM lying reneger.
Very good list.
I'd like to add two items, however.
1) Untold TRILLIONS of dollars siphoned off, or stolen, and redirected into secret black-ops programs unknown to most of congress.
2) Majority of government military and intelligence gathering operations have been privatized and are largely unaccountable both financially, operationally and legally to the congress.
Freeman: excellent list!
Quickstepper: wonderful definition of a "master" story!
Cygnus: great additions to the list!
Everybody: It's a time really for hope not despair despite all this bad news. I tried to express this in my New Year's message for today: "An Existential New Year's Wish: Hope in a Time of Despair." Please take a look before you decide to snuff yourself. (I gave a lot of attention to Freeman's #10).
http://sunstateactivist.org/ssablog/?p=317
Jerry, I read the blog. The message seems to be; don't worry, be happy about being screwed because lucky you will be screwed again and again for eternity. As it applies to #10, stolen elections; ok, we know about 2000, 2004, and 2008. The framework is built and elections will never be representative of the people in the current system, but yahooie the elections will be stolen again in 2012... sorry but I'm not feeling very happy about it.
Buck: Hey, I hear you and I know the existentialist way of thought is not for everybody but it keeps me in the struggle as opposed to snuffing out in despair. And you misread me on one key point: I'm not happy about being screwed, I'm happy that I will never, never give up the fight, giving myself the excuse that no matter what I do, the big bad "circumtances" (you know, the MIC, Cheney, Limbaugh. the grinning empty suit in the White House) are always going to win. That's the "defeatist" attitude that is precisely the reason that we ALWAYS WILL be screwed; so let's all whine about it and back to the consolations of "real life." I think Frank Sinatra said: the only way you can get through a night is with whiskey, sex or religion. Add sports to that, and I think you have all the diversions people need to keep them out of the struggle and into enough self-indulgence that they can stay alive. I'll use those diversions p.r.n., but will never make these, along with a dose of political defeatism, the sum total of my life, as I would be denying my humanity by so doing.
Thanks for making me think this out a little more. Jerry
Jerry, I come here to hear different perspectives. Many here, you and me included, want the same things, but differ greatly in style of communication and approach to solutions. I don't think I have a defeatist mindset, just have accepted that the system is rigged and am forced to consider something other than elections for a fix. This makes me unhappy as Thoreau, Gandhi, and King's nonviolent approach has been my guide. Revolution is eminent. We are just waiting for enough people to be desperate. Buck
Buck,
You are right, many here want the same things. However, I caution you and everyone NOT to wait for the revolution because the revolution is on - against us!
We must start acting now, in whatever way we can. Sitting back and waiting for a critical mass to revolt is futile, and shows a lack of imagination and will. I'm not directing this at you, but at the sentiment that we are powerless and must wait until others either fix it or join in. Like waiting for Godot, this is mere futility.
Do what you can, where you are, at this time. Even if no one else joins in, it will steel you for the days to come.
Ted, The class war has been going on since civilizations started forming. I quit working in 2000 so not to pay taxes and support the machine. I've tried to tell people of the criminals in government and the immorality of war and the standard responses are, "I don't care," and "Can't we talk about something else?" I burned too much fuel driving to d.c. to march in protest. I haven't given up, but am running out of new ideas, another reason I come here. Buck
Excellent article (and well-written). Freedom is frightening to most people I am afraid. While not quite (mostly) sheep, they flock to comfort groupings as we do to comfort foods when facing the ills of the world. Comfort groupings include alas some political groups, churches, and ethnic associations. Where like-thinking folks can gripe and groan together. Occasionally get behind yet another two-facer running for office.
It is both as a group and as individuals that we need to proceed. As a group we need common goals as we individually pursue different paths till we discover ones that work -- happily we have found some already, boycotts spring to mind.
Fear of freedom is hard to overcome, it means being very lonely at times as it seems all those around you are blind to reality. The Inernet has changed that however, as we discover to our delight there are others capable of seeing the old man (or men) behind the curtain of Mass Media Deception.
Happy New Year and don't give up on hope and change despite Obama's failure on those goals.
gdgoodman: Thank you for your generous comment and your New Year wishes; my own go back to you. Jerry
I agree with all the Top Ten, but unfortunately the environmental crisis of global warming tops them all. Nature always bats last.
"Untold TRILLIONS of dollars siphoned off, or stolen, and redirected into secret black-ops programs unknown to most of congress."
If the programs are "unknown to most of congress", then how is it known to "Cygnus-X1-isaHole"? IOW, what is the evidence? Thanks in advance.
Dare I add one? The influence of Conservastive pundits through Faux News and AM radio shows. Polls show their evil influence, yet we hear nothing about them unless Rush Lunkhead gets 'rushed' (pun intended) to the hospital.
Another is how the "global warming" deniers have taken over the Republicans and other conservatives and many "middle of the roaders" (good place to get run over).
Another is the acidification of the oceans which will quickly destroy our aquafood supplies and destroy coral reefs. Yet we hear nothing about it while the poor polar bears are now grist for TV ads.
Gary
Let me add three more.
1) Food supply has been largely privatized and untested GM crops are essentially in all our food (unlabeled). This entire process happened with almost zero public discussion and no independent scientific testing of the impact on the environment or the health of those who consume their food.
2) Both our dominant political parties have decided the rule of law does not apply to the rich/elite/power brokers in our country. Their crimes are either overlooked or later immunized by retroactive law. Only their sexual pecadillos are highlighted. All other crimes go unpunished. The rule of law is now reserved only for the working/lower class.
3) The Constitution was replaced by The Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, the new FISA laws and NSPD51.
Cygnus-X1-isaHole has hit the nail on the head, especially with #2--witness the news that yesterday Blackwater was absolved of all wrongdoing in the Iraq shootings. Eric Prince's money and influence has prevailed with the Courts. Fascism is indeed the ruling mode.
Sioux Rose
GARY: He does list the corporate control of media, i.e. managing of content to fabricate consensus... even if he didn't delineate the existence of the hate radio shock jocks in specific.
I would add another item that seems glaringly missing from the list, however; and it would involve the lack of political muscle behind climate change initiatives. When Obama came into office, the economic free fall (jobless rates) was the perfect opportunity for creating a green "back to work force." Thus the failure to do the right thing which would be wise from not only an ecological, but also an economic perspective, was a GLARING forfeiture pointing to an all too clear dereliction of duty.
For a nation leaning right (that is to say, its political "leadership"), there's scant proof of said force ever doing the RIGHT thing! (And by that I mean, what's morally significant.) This the living embodiment of rule by oxymoron.
I was wondering when someone would get around to that, probably the most important item. I'm still holding my breath, wondering when those fast track intercontinental railroads are going to get started, and when the labor will begin on all those windmills. I can't understand why there is so much unemployment when there is so much work to be done.
Maybe because the people we elected are in the pockets of very stupid people -- they bought into that con of derivitives alter all. Stupidity could account for a lot that is contributed to vast conspiracies. Never underestimate the stupidity of the average CEO, they shipped jobs overseas to destroy their own consumer base for example.
Gary
a good list of the bad. and who knew? well, just about anybody that can read between the lies.
2009 is nothing but history, 2010 an unknowable mystery
2010 could also be a gift...that's why it's called the present.
A rising tide lifts all boats, except the ones with holes in them, which are the only boats that most people can afford.
Sometimes it pays to recognize that any political/economic system is interconnected in uncountable ways, and many trends that one would see as unrelated are actually creating active and powerful positive feedback loops that are critical in determining how the system evolves. It helps to, from time to time, review policies, ideas, and trends, even those that appear at first glance to be "progressive," and evaluate how they might fit into general trends.
Those concerns lead me to wonder whether the corporatocracy, that loose association of powerful corporate interests with overlapping goals and similar interests, helped to create an ideal corporatist environment by almost completely eliminating, through the application of continuous and ubiquitous pressure, those cultural forces that it perceived as threatening. And would it not have most easily eliminated those that the ordinary citizen would also have considered as at least arguably undesirable? Has the corporatocracy taught us to despise just those things in our culture necessary for waging a successful class war from the bottom, e.g. discipline, the will to make hard choices, the desire to sacrifice for the good of the entire community (not just some identity group subset), and the courage to endure disapprobation by elites?
>>those cultural forces that it perceived as threatening<<
Coudl you specify those "forces" please. We need to find out how to sneak them past the watchdogs.
Gary
The corporatists are not going to let go of power unless someone rips it out of their "cold, dead hands," as movie Moses might have phrased it. Malcolm X, describing how he might reach his goals, used to say "by any means necessary." The Black Panthers observed that those in power would never willingly cede it. They believed that instilling discipline and willingly engaging in great sacrifice and making hard decisions would be necessary to achieve their goals. They ultimately failed, but others who succeeded, in other movements around the world, did so with similar attitudes and approaches. Such sentiments and attitudes, and the positive feedback loops, the reward systems, involved in promoting them, have been greatly reduced over time through corporatist pressure applied of various kinds through various means. Furthermore, there are not, and have not been for some time, any encouragement for those who would undergo great personal sacrifice for the good of the whole community (even 40 years ago the encouragement the Black Panthers' encountered mostly flowed from the focus of their movement on the welfare of a racial identity group and not the whole community).
There is no safe, easy way to reclaiming power for the benefit of the entire society or the entire human race, and there are few if any rewards for those who would engage in means that would have any reasonable chance for success. The easy, safe means have been shown to work for the social/cultural issues in the US in recent decades, but that is because the corporatists are neutral on such issues (though their useful idiots, particularly the religious ones, may be passionate). No safe, easy means have had any success in preventing the corporatists from consolidating power, accumulating great wealth, and exerting tremendous influence over the past few decades or in confronting them on the economic welfare issues. However, the corporate media and other corporatists often have success in convincing "progressives" to conflate the social/cultural issues with the economic welfare issues and thereby convince such people that progress is being made and can be made under the political system as presently constituted using such safe, easy means.
So Correct
WALL STREET OF AMERICA
formerly USA
Decline of Our Empire
EMPIRE DESTRUCTION
1980 to 2007
20 YEARS OF 3 CONSERVATIVE PRESIDENTS
18 years Conservative Senate
12 years Conservative House
6 years Total Conservative Control
Redistribution of Wealth to top 20%.
Folk! It is downhill slide for Middle Class.
FACTS---numbers rounded-
1946--1% owned 30% of Total Wealth
1980—20%--a 33% decline due to Estate Tax and High Top Income Tax Rate.
thence cometh conservatism
1989-36%
80% Increase in 8 years of Reaganism
1993-47%
2007--20% owned 93% of Total non home Financial Wealth
80% owned equity in homes.
Most major corporations are owned by WALL STREET RICH MEN CASINO
In 1945, corporations paid 35.4% of federal revenues and 7.4% in 2003
In 2000, 45% of corporations with revenue over 50 million paid no federal tax
Five Wall Street Banks own 75% of all Bank Deposits in America. 5.
Two own 20%.
Think that is not POWER???
Power indeed, coupled with control of the media and the schools through sponsorships and the biased textbooks they put out.
A general strike with millions leaving work to march in the streets would put the wealthy on notice.
So would hanging a few and leaving them dangling in the public square.
E-mails your friends -- maybe there is now a feeling of disgust great enough to motivate strong action. Doesn't hurt to ask.
Till then inform others what is REALLY going on. Send them to this site as a start.
Gary
It's no surprise that it is black people and black orginizations that spell it out. Black people have been staring at naked aggression against them for hundreds of years. They know the score.
Switch registration to third party on January 13 th
Don't wait until January 13th. You do not have to register as third party you need only to resolve NOT TO VOTE CORPORATE. You must get over the idea that one corporate party is worse than the other. You must not vote for any person in Congress who voted for the surge in Afghanistan, for the bankster bailout or who did not support Single Payer, Medicare for all.
Don't vote for the corrupt! Making this resolution will allow new independent or third party candidates to step forward. Kick the corrupt out of Congress and maybe we can establish democracy in this nation. A government directed by the people may be possible.
We are no longer a country ruled by the Constitution and the rule law.
Instead, our country is run by an all-powerful Unitary Executive, essentially a King, who has the power of all three branches of government.
This seismic shift of power, amazingly, was aided by the congress, and not so amazingly, the corporate media.
Obama was handed the Unitary Executive crown from the Bush administration and promptly went to work to expand it.
It is now repeated, as though it is fact, that a President can launch wars, order prisoners held without trial and write laws (via signing statements) by both our dominant political parties.
Frankly, I don't think the president has any power.
Presidents are smiling puppets.
The power is off screen.
Spot on.
The President is only carrying out what he has been instructed to do, not much different than Karzai in Afghanistan who is a puppet of the same International Finaciers who handpicked Obama. This has been going on at least since Viet Nam and as long as we have a two party duopoly nothing will ever change because both parties are traitors to the American people and the few that really are not are only about 1% so have no chance in determining American foreign policy and are only marginal at the best in determing America's domestic policy because the other 99% are nothing other than attorneys for the fascist corportocracy. The Presidents are nothing more than a figure head and a quisling for the same people that really run America behind the scenes. Register third party in 2010.
>>we have a two party duopoly<<
Shouldn't that be a DUPEolpy?
Gary
Yes, "a puppet of the same International Financiers."
My jaw and throat are both sore from all those "I told you so"s that mark me as far outside the mainstream.
You too.