The Lethal Injection College Fund
Here's one billion dollars. Kill a few people, or help thousands?
Here's a modestly clever idea that will never come to pass in a thousand years because it's absolutely not the way modern life or America work right now, but it's nevertheless all sorts of delightfully ironic fun to ponder anyway.
I'm reading a bit about how our fine, God-loving nation just executed John Allen Muhammad, aka the Washington D.C. sniper, injected his remorseless flesh with a megadose of sodium pentothal as dozens of people actually chose to sit behind a glass wall and watch him writhe and twitch and die sans any final statement or single sign of penitence or satisfying explanation as to his murderous actions.
If you like, you can read the story right now on this fair site, and then jump to the bottom where you will certainly find a reeking cesspool of some of the most nasty, disturbing anonymous comments from fine, God-fearing Americans, and then proceed calmly to feeling utterly soiled, disgusted and sad about the human race as a whole.
Here's a better idea: Skip that, and instead check out the recent study from the Death Penalty Information Center, which states that after all court costs, fees and various social machinations are factored in, the average death sentence costs each state that supports it about $30 million per inmate, running well into hundreds of millions in wasted taxpayer dollars every year.
I say "wasted" because the study proves that, even from a simple economic perspective, the death penalty is ridiculous and culturally debilitating, and the various states in question could save hundreds of millions a year simply by locking the prisoner up for life.
To be honest, the first idea to occur to me wasn't even all that clever. I initially wondered what would happen if you took, say, 30 of the nastiest, most hateful, eye-for-an-eye death penalty supporters and anonymous commenters in America today, and made them the following offer:
I will hereby give each of you $1 million if you agree that we will not kill this insane, murderous criminal, and instead just let him rot in prison for the rest of his life without a chance of parole. A million bucks, all for you. Or, we kill him, waste the $30 million and you get nothing.
Do you know how many would accept? Of course you do. All of them. Which means, for most, support of the death penalty is no serious moral conviction at all; it's merely an ugly, black hunk of reactionary spittle, the bleak human vengeance synapse writ large, something reptilian and small and just about as far from our often hypocritical concepts of God and forgiveness, compassion and understanding, as you can possibly get.
Thankfully, this admittedly spiteful thought soon passed and quickly led to the wider idea I mentioned at the top of this column. Do you know what $30 million can buy these days? What your average cash-strapped urban playground could do with that kind of money, particularly during a recession?
Here's my simple and semi-obvious idea: what if Washington D.C. had taken the same $30 million, and instead of killing a single remorseless criminal, created upwards of 600 full-ride college scholarships for lower-income or minority students, at 50 grand each.
In other words, for every criminal a given state is seeking to execute -- like, for example, the Fort Hood killer, who they say might well be eligible for the death penalty -- we take the same tens of millions in taxpayer dollars and send hundreds of kids through college instead, kids who otherwise would never have been able to afford it and in fact might've ended up on the streets or in prison.
We'll call it the Lethal Injection College Fund. It shall, by its very existence, do nothing less than completely transform the ugly American revenge impulse into something celebratory and optimistic. We shall transmute a brutal crime into a glimmer of hope and possibility. From dark to light. From excrement, flowers. From our most violent nightmares, a hint of grace. What a thing.
In 2008, the United States executed about 30 males, all by lethal injection, unless they lived in South Carolina, in which case it was electrocution preceded by being forced to stare for two full weeks at a poster of Lindsay Graham. Horrible.
That's nearly $1 billion in taxpayer money wasted last year alone across the U.S. -- mostly in the South -- just to kill a few criminals, just to keep alive a vile and primitive idea that's proven to be not the slightest deterrent to violent crime, and only puts us on par with some of the world's most cruel and sadistic third-world nations. Theoretically, that's 18,000 kids we could've put through college. One dead criminal, or 18,000 educated kids. What a choice.
Did you note the fascinating kicker regarding the Lethal Injection College Fund? The amazing twist? Among those theoretical 18,000, it's a safe bet that, had it not been for the LICF, many would've eventually wound up in prison themselves, a few probably on death row. Translation: One violent criminal saves countless potential future criminals from the same fate. There's a karmic lesson in there somewhere.
Do not misunderstand. I am well aware of the utter absurdity of this idea, not to mention that you could take the same simplistic formula and apply it just about anywhere -- for example, say, flipping the insane cost of a single U.S. military fighter jet (also about $30 million, ironically) into how many homeless puppies could be saved if we used that money for shelters. I realize that the economy simply does not work this way.
Unless it does. Because of course, the death penalty has a special, particularly nasty tang. It is no weapon for peace. It is no advancement of the human experiment. It only serves to devolve, regress, keep us low and brutal and mean.
I would like to report that we are nearing the end of the reactionary bloodlust phase of the American experiment, that, with the Obama-inspired resurgence of positivism and the concomitant lessening of the bogus, pseudo-cowboy American fantasy, the dark energy that seems to welcome the death penalty is lessening, and it feels as if we are about to join the rest of the civilized world in rejecting this inhumane, animalistic practice.
But of course, I can't possibly say such a thing. We are nowhere near that point. Not when 65 percent of Americans still support the death penalty, bullets are sold out across the land, and millions absolutely refuse to evolve past paranoia and fear and vengeance, the ugliest of American cornerstones and the most clenched, spiritually bereft aspects of our national identity.
And now, John Allen Muhammad is dead, and no one anywhere feels the slightest bit better, not really, not if they're honest, not if they truly look their god in the eye and try to justify this dark, spirtually bereft human impulse. And, oh yes, 600 hypothetical kids will now never go to college.
Oh well. It was all just a silly fantasy anyway.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
43 Comments so far
Show All"But there is one side of the picture that has escaped photographic skill. It is the background of widows and orphans, the light of life forever quenched in their hearts. And this desolation must be imagined-broken hearts cannot be photographed."
A corpse is at peace. For many relatives of murderer's lusts and killings, knowing the sweating muscular body that did the deed is six feet under makes going on with life possible, easier; closure.
Who has the right to deny them this? To tell them , "No. Suffer more than you have, more than you need to. Your son's killer's life is sacred." Eat Shit. Adopt a new kid.
Or like my ex-mommy, "Get over it," when my 2nd son died?
[A corpse is at peace. For many relatives of murderer's lusts and killings, knowing the sweating muscular body that did the deed is six feet under makes going on with life possible, easier; closure.]
And when those orphans or widows find out that the state killed the wrong man? Or what of those who actually are christians and argue that those who trespassed against them not be killed? How does killing someone - even those who I'd agree shouldn't have a right to live - bring any closure? You've just argued that vengeance is justice. I disagree, it just brings about more vengeance.
I'm not convinced that killing those who murder is any sort of punishment for them. Locking them in a cage - much like we lock up dangerous animals - where they'll never get out, where the only human contact they'll have is by rape or beatings or strip searching, and finally burying them under their prison number (stripping the last vestige of their humanity away from them) after most people have forgotten they exist is a punishment. If the murderer is just dead that's it, he cannot suffer anymore. You're far too merciful to those who don't deserve that mercy.
Saturnalia; criteria for absolute certainty is ez-videotape, repeated cofession w/ overwhelming physical/dna evidence.
But, please. I only support state-killing when the victims are either children, premeditated in the 1st degree kidnap/executions, serial killing, but most homicides involve angry lovers who lose it, or people blacked out on alcohol who don't remember what happened. For many, much less than life w/o parole would be justice.
A very narrow group; childkillers, executioners, Serial killers. Backed by Dead Certainty.
Otherwise 10-20, get right, get out; yes, for most killers. Better?
[ but most homicides involve angry lovers who lose it]
And who will never kill again, you're quite right. Although in some of those cases I think a life sentence is appropriate, just one that gives them parole after 10-25 years.
Although some of the ones you've mentioned 'childkillers, executioners, Serial killers.' would enjoy the notoriety of being executed by the state. They want to be famous for doing evil, and part of that is to be killed either while doing it or after a trial. I think the creature bundy enjoyed his trial as much as he enjoyed killing, certainly the critter manson did. But I don't think manson is able to enjoy growing very old in his box.
The major reason I'm against killing even those we know are as guilty as sin is that I'm not sure that there is any suffering on their part after they die. If some religions are right, all they need to do is confess their sins to a priest and be forgiven, or just accept Jeazus as their lord and saviour for them to enter into eternal bliss. I'd rather be sure that the murderer isn't going to be able to go from life to afterlife and not pay something for what they did.
Saturnalia, Good a.m., I support it primarily to help the victims who live, to heal their hearts as many, most, profess it does. In the rare case when the vic's family asks for no ex., go with it.
Saturnalia, I play the guitar, 6 string acoustic Ibanez. It brings me true joy at times. I have no tv, but look at cnn on line about once a week to remember why and hear the lies.
This week, pure chance, during this thread, I caught an article about Manson's guitar playing, (he has tv too!) how he enjoyed singing....it was so wrong. Six people slashed to death. One for each string! Zero remorse, BUT; good care, friendships and music fill CM's days. Movies and laughter! He celebrated his 75th birthday!
Blood dripped from Sharon Tate's ceilings, the spray, the trails like psychedlic art, Helter-Skelter. CM was the most notorious mass-murderer, serial killer ever, but, many many many more quickly followed Manson.....if he'd been summarily executed, I think the wave of killers that struck in his wake might have been smaller. Following him to the grave would have been less attractive than following him to stardom.
yikes-to love!
Excellent idea but it would never fly (unless, of course, the righteous, holier than thou Christers are offered the 30 mil instead). Americans are, by nature, vidictive, violent and blood thirsty, there's nothing that turns them on more than the sight of death. This need for blood started with the conquest of the continent, the cleansing of the Native Americans, continued with slavery, flourished with two world wars and the Asian continent, rages on in the ME today and blooms within the country in the form of serial killers and mass murderers, a phenomenom indigenous to this countrry, as American as apple pie and hot dogs. Peace is not in the genetic make-up of this warrior society.
What sick puppies these bastards are!
You are absolutely right! We should not waste all that money getting rid of these murderers. Instead we should expedite thier executions when there is no doubt that they commited the crimes. In the USA we are entitled to reasonably quick justice without unnecessary delays. It shouldn't take more than a few months to send a person like J.A.M. to the death chamber.
Nice try, kayaker, but in the real world there are wrongful convictions -- malicious politically grandstanding prosecutors, lazy cops, incompetent public defenders, forced confessions, lying jailhouse informants. In the past few years, DNA and other means have exonerated over 100 innocent people who have been railroaded for murder. Most of them spent decades in prison for a crime they didn't commit.
I know one personally. Completely innocent. 23 years in prison. Let me say that again. 23 YEARS IN PRISON!! And if he'd been swiftly executed, then what about his parents and family? Wouldn't they be in exactly the same position as azjoe (previous comment)-- grieving till they die over an innocent life lost to murder? Only in this case it would've been the public who murdered him. That means you, kayaker. You would be the murderer. And what vengeance should we wreak on you then?
No, until we have a justice system that is actually just and infallible, capital punishment is a crime.
I specified 'when there is no doubt that they commited the crimes'. J.A.M. was clearly the murderer and I don't think that there was any doubt about that.
The fellow who recently murdered people at Fort Hood should be executed within a few months. But of course he will live many more years before justice is carried out. Unless the military is more efficient in taking care of this man than the civil justice system would be.
Even after executions, plenty of doubt over guilt exists. DNA evidence proved a wave of false convictions when it was introduced, and there's no reason to believe that only those who remained alive and could be exonerated by DNA were innocent or had unrecognized extenuating circumstances.
Let's name ALL the killers. For instance my kin who died a horrific death from mesothelioma brought to him by asbestos exposure for most of his life, on the job__Johns Manville. And a friend, died very young, job_working with fiberglass. How about those killed in Coal Mines? And those killed who are called collateral damage? Or those who are gravely ill or dying or dead due to the environmental damage brought on by degradation of their environment in wars? There are so many ways murder is done. Starving little children in many underdeveloped countries. turning a blind eye on the misery that is life for so many around the world while we and other highly industrialized countries gobble up 80% of the world's resources.
Prisons exist to safeguard society from those who have been found to be violent not to "punish" those who act against others. We cannot "punish" for killing. There is no punishment that fits the crime. The life lost is not recompensed by any means, certainly not "revenge".
There are mental illnesses that can never be treated or reformed.
What do we do with those so mind-sick that they murder?
An animal that killed would be euthanized without remorse. It is our belief that humanity is "more" than an animal, that makes murder heinous.
Imprisonment is a brutal and expensive business.
An individual who chooses brutality of another in the streets or in the courts embraces brutality.
Do we then not become what we seek to condemn?
Live Simply So That Others May Simply Live
But after establishing the principle that the thirty maniacs would settle for a million-buck buy-off each . . . the price could be negotiated. The scumbags would probably settle for about ten thousand bucks each, maybe less.
There some outright MONSTERS sitting In Canadian Prisons these days, including one Clifford Olsen who actually writes parents LETTERS mocking them with what he did to their child before he murdrered them.
I still cannot support the death penalty. I can only speak for myself. I can not judge what those parents feel.
NYDaily News headline after 'our' government murdered one of our own:
"Families CELEBRATE Execution Of Sniper"
Wonder... was there cake at the Execution Celebration? Dancing maybe? Is Hallmark making Execution Celebration cards yet?
'Roses are red; Violets are blue; You killed us; now we're killin' you! Happy Execution! And may God bless.'
How come me and the rest of America wasn't invited to the Execution Celebration? I mean, I love to celebrate stuff - couldn't they at least have had the forethought to let FOX cover it live in 3-D HDTV Dolby Surround so I could celebrate government murder in the comfort of my own home?
Guess I'm just gonna have to rent one of any number of movies featuring Executions and pretend celebrate...
Frank, you were not invited to the execution, to answer your question, because YOUR SON WAS NOT GUNNED DOWN IN COLD BLOOD BY THAT EFFING MURDERER. Or Mother.
Quit judging those whose lives were destroyed by a monster. They chose to do WHATEVER THE EFF THEY WANTED TO; HE KILLED THEIR KIDS & PARENTS. It helps to watch him die, videotape it and watch it with breakfast lunch and dinner for LIFE.
Helps what?
Casanova recounts his experience of the execution of Damiens, an attempted regicide, in Paris. To abbrieviate, the man was pulled through the streets before thronging crowds, sulpher poured into his wounds, tournequets applied to prolong his life, and finally pulled apart by horses while the noble ladies in Casanova's carriage masturbated.
Justice?
Objectivity?
Something not likely to happen in a civilized country today?
Assuming that a murderer did not take someone close to you, it might do you good to ask yourself on whom you actually want revenge, and why.
Helps them cope. Obviously.
Manson is 75, had a nice birthday, but "mostly plays his guitar and sings."
You don't get it & I don't care. He slaughtered 6 human beings. He gets neat letters from followers still. Has fun, enjoys yummies AND A LONG LIFE. Kill him.
I hate death and pain. I've known plenty of both. The idea of murder is so foul, the stench so evil, the act so ugly.....you must live soft to find it forgivable. To wish life to those who give death, torture and kill. We should all receive as we give. "To each according to his need."
I find it bs; if someone tortured and killed YOUR children, they should be given a guitar, tv, medical treatment, meals and PROTECTIVE custody. Idiotic & every con knows it.
Let's look at two different cases. The first is John Allen Muhammad. This person was accused of killing several people by sniperfire was convicted and executed. American rejoices. The second is an unnamed rich kid who by virtue of his political position lied the nation into two illegal wars in which over 5000 American kids and a million innocent civilians have been killed. This person hasen't been investigated and lives for the rest of his life in a multi-million dollar house in Dallas while being protected and paid a very lucrative retirement by the taxpayers. What's wrong with this picture?
aussidog-I know, it does not mention America rejoices in act b, not just act a.
ps-supporting allen's killing sure ain't rejoicing in it for me.
Now I'd rejoice if we hung the Chimp.
30 million does seem a bit excessive.aussiedog,a brilliant point about the rich gene pool sadist,who,with the Carlyle group, bought, via one of his daughters, a few hundred thousand acres of natural gas land,near Bolivia,just in case,just before he absconded from office.Tail between his legs but nothing more.
excellent post!Tony
info on the costs question
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/costs-death-penalty
The cost question - why in a nation that defines itself by the bottom line, is there the glaring paradox when it comes to the right to institutionalized murder?
The high cost of claiming the right to kill touches on a mythological dynamic of it also being legitimate not to teach about the historical dynamics of ethnocide, genocide, ecocide...
Ignore the mountains electronics pollution, the sea of trash, the massacres of originary peoples, the ongoing displacement by industrial agriculture, extractive industries...
I suspect that for many Americans the ritual of execution supports the myth of justice. Americans support a system that punishes them and seldom moves to provide for them. Were it to provide humane treatment to criminals, the inhumanity and inutility of its mistreatment of them would become more glaring.
I suspect - if I may be forgiven for writing as though I could read another's thoughts - that such an attitude may apply to the apparent rage in Kayaker's posts above.
Human sacrifice has been a large part of despotic regimes since prehistory. Since it continues with no clear evidence of any efficacy as deterrent, it seems reasonable to believe that it functions as another form of false healing by pharmakoi or scapegoats, to kathartize emotions rather than otherwise address problems.
Unfortunately, disconnected catharsis is palliative at best - real suffering for false healing. Would we were awake to address those who hurt us in whatever arena the violence has taken place.
And then there's the horror we Americans have gotten used to: making moral decisions by adding up the $$ on either side of the issue. As long as we continue to measure everything according to its monetary value we will continue to be dead men walking.
MM missed something.
Sure most people sing any tune for a mill.
Executing killers is largely for the victims mother father son & daughter. And most of them-Mark, lotta viewers for that serial killers death because of so many destroyed Lives; most would choke on your analysis.
Funerals. I've buried a Son.
Wanna tell me about Death? Grief? Whether or not my Soul is for Sale?
My daughter's Life Mark? (Say hi to Joel Selvin from a Reel Old friend by the way)
Tell me it's about $$$ Mark. How many fathers out there would deliver into the care of officers for Life the sweating lustfilled killer of their child if they had their hands on him in private? (If any, shoot yourselves.)
How about BEGGING, Pleading, Crying; like a Child being Raped for it to Stop, for a Lethal Injection? Imagine. That.
I love MM. But Death visited on others by choice may be beyond his ken; one of decency and Light. Like many CD'rs, women more often too. Would that all your wishes were as true.
my son is 15, azjoe, and I am very concerned for him as he enters what I consider to be prime 'conflict' age...the military, the police, other young men...everybody goes after this demographic, packing violence in their wake...
my heart goes out to you and your loss of your son, as I can only imagine the heartbreak of losing mine...
dubet, thankyou, your heart will sequester your son from storms. I've observed too 18-21 to be critical but oft neglected yrs, the thousand days I call it when a life is charted, it's direction chosen.
fromadtantplanet; hello out there. You don't sound so far away...
As a father I cannot begin to fathom the grief of losing a child by any manner. The utter pointlessness of life after such a thing leaves me saddened beyond description.
I too would do anything to protect my child and do anything to avenge if I failed in that most sacred duty.
But I am re-assured that, where I live, there is a justice system [sometimes merely nominal] that would not allow me to do to an imaginary perpetrator any of the terrible things I could envision.
Justice delayed is denied. Upon conviction, the sentence should be summarily executed. For the bargain cost of a bullet (or two) of sufficient calibre to the base of the brain. Result: no repeat of the capital crime - Win/Win. I'll take that $29,999,999 for the first one's savings in greenbacks.
And if subsequent evidence shows that the executed person was innocent of the crime, everyone who supported his execution must also be executed, in the exact same manner that he was.
Result: win/win.
I am very mildly against capital punishment right now -- only because I no longer believe that the trial system is fair.
Once/if we fix trials so black men and others can get a fair shake, then getting rid of the guilty murderers is not a bad plan.
In olden days a quick firing squad or hanging awaited the convicted. This would be a cost savings plan -- save the (supposed) $30 million referenced in the article and the $40K per year spent on housing.
I don't particularly care of if the method of execution is humane -- let them twist in the wind. Televise it.
But first -- a fair trial and some determination if the person is worth returning to society some day. So GED and jobs programs for convicts in for a few years -- makes good sense. Life sentences without parole -- nope, execute them.
-- Zagone
DNA may be determining a somewhat different outcome for the innocent put to death that we all abhorr.I SUPPORT the death penalty,however.My reasons are, Polly Klaas, Jessica Lundsford(aged five,she was kidnapped from her home,raped over many days,then buried alive)Bundy,Gaycee,Dahmer and lots more of these monsters (killed by prison inmates)all white guys by the way.The topic is complicated and subjective.The private prison systems (duck Cheney owned, are lucrative).If the death penalty candidates really are guilty, although the system of establishing that, is awash with politics and corruption,thus unreliable,then I would like to see more economical and creative ways of dealing with them.A ticket to Bagram,perhaps.Oh and Pentothal is humane.I received some when I had surgery,could not count to ten and went off to sleep quite pleasantly.The article is a bit embellished.I'd take pentothal over waterboarding.
Killing those who are guilty in a quick and 'humane' way is not a punishment at all. If you want to deter those who would kill threatening them with a quick death is not going to do it. Threatening them with a lifetime of living in a box will deter those who have the brains to realise that there are consequences for their actions.
The ones who don't realise that there are such consequences are insane, or not competent to conduct a defence at a trial. Killing bundy or dahmer isn't going to deter another insane nutball from imitating them, nor is it punishment as the monsters are not really human. They are evil. But lowering ourselves to their level is not going to bring back the dead, nor will it punish those who will - like that John Muhammed guy - see themselves as becoming martyrs. What might deter them is the knowledge that they'll die decades after most of the world has forgotten that they exist at all.
The thirty million is referring to the legal costs of the appeals that the convicted launches after being convicted. A cost that would be reduced if they were just sentenced to life without parole. It wouldn't be eliminated, as the convicted can still try to present evidence that he/she's not guilty of the crime.
I don't like the death penalty as it's too quick and easy for the guilty. Let them rot in a metal cage for 50-70 years, then die in that box, and finally be buried behind prison walls and under their prison number rather than have a tombstone with a name on it. Ask any con or ex-con what their greatest fear is/was and they'll tell you it was to die in jail never again being able to see the sky without also seeing the bars.
Then there's that whole afterlife bullbiscuits, there's no proof that you're either rewarded or punished after death. Killing the guilty just gives them a getout of jail free card, they're dead, they're not going to suffer anymore. I don't like that idea at all. Better for them to spend a few decades stuffed into a box before they go to whatever happens after we die, if anything happens at all other than a bit of rotting...
I couldn't agree with you more. To me the death penalty as a sentence is completely irrational. The second the person is executed their sentence is over. There is nothing else you can do to him, he is in essence free, existing a peaceful dreamless state for eternity.
That to me seems like the easy way out. Given the choice between life in prison without parol in some miserable federal facility or death, I would take death in a second. Sure it would be a terrifying thing as your execution neared, but once its done, all your misery has ended.
On the other hand lock them up for life and everyday they wake up in prison and have to live one more miserable day of a lifetime of punishment. Think of Charles Manson for example. If he had been executed he would be a distant memory, but because he is still alive we get watch him slowly age in front of our eyes as he lives out a dismal existence.
And, when you wind up in prison, wrongly convicted, please call me. I'd love to pull the trigger for you.
I do not find the $30 million dollar figure credible. It is said that it costs $40 thousand a year to keep a person in prison. If one sits on death row for 40 years, thats $1.6 million. I'd like to see a breakdown of the numbers, please.
I am against the death penalty. As the author states, it is brutal, low and mean, and only serves to perpetuate the worst in us.
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/CostsRptFinal.pdf
"I'd like to see a breakdown of the numbers, please."
Me too.
"It was all just a silly fantasy anyway." Fantasy or no, I applaud the piece. Thirty million dollars is alot of money to spend on killing someone. I don't quite agree with calling the program the Lethal Injection College Fund and hereby propose it be called The Better Off Not Dead fund. All in favor say "Aye!" And I don't mean "An eye for an eye!"
good pun Joan!wink
Aye for some