EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
Popular content
Today's Top News
How Obama Betrayed Honduras
The United States must honour its promises to Central America by refusing to support the coup leaders in Honduras
Let's hope that the United States finally decides that it's going to do what its president said it would do for Central America. It should be a simple task, that of cutting off its support of the bad guys in Honduras and starting to honour the commitment to democracy that Barack Obama clearly announced when he met the leaders of Latin America at the Summit of the Americas.
So far the administration's actions towards the gang of semi-educated ruffians who took over in Tegucigalpa and who feel, for racial reasons, that the US leader is beneath their contempt, has been – to put it kindly – ragged. The almost universal cry of "foul" went up when the legally elected Manuel Zelaya was sent out of the country in his pyjamas by Roberto Micheletti, an obscure politician and businessman, who had seized power.
US secretary of state Hillary Clinton was first off the starting block when she condemned the impostor's action. Then Barack came along to say what she had chosen not to say: that the real president should be returned to the office he rightfully exercised.
Now however the word from every involved agency in Washington is that Zelaya should be allowed back on the strict condition that he does not upset friends of the US, the Republican party and the telecommunication companies in DC with his state-owned corporation Hondutel. This is ridiculous for two reasons. The first is to do with simple justice – Zelaya won a victory in clean elections. The second has to do with the US president's image in the western hemisphere. The last eight years in the Middle East and the unfolding debacles in Iraq and Afghanistan should have taught the US and the British governments that if they attempt the impossible – such as trying to invade and occupy countries on spurious grounds and with recourse to kidnapping and torture – they will get egg all over themselves. And egg stains never look good on presidential or prime ministerial lounge suits – much less on military uniforms, gold braid and medal ribbons.
Yet Obama is presiding over a group of politicians and civil servants who appear to think that they have it in their power to convince Latin Americans and the world that a Honduran coup d'etat is not a coup d'etat and that a dictatorship which imposes curfews and gags the media as part of a drive to help the interests of foreign businessmen is a democratic government.
The leaders of all the members of the Organisation of American States have condemned Micheletti, as have the UN and the EU. If Clinton and the survivors of the wilder rightwing fringes of the Bush administration to whom she is bizarrely allied have their way US reaction to the impostor will be ineffectual.
Instead of treating the impostor government with all the weapons that the US has used against successive Cuban governments and against the elected government of Venezuela, Micheletti has been asked to play along with president Oscar Arias of Costa Rica. Arias has treated him as an equal, which he isn't, rather than an aspiring Pinochet, which the deaths and injuries his police and troops on the border have inflicted on Zelaya's supporters demonstrate that he is.
And that – as Clinton knows better than anyone – will be very damaging for Obama. The claims made by Hugo Chávez of Venezuela and Fidel Castro of Cuba that nothing much has changed between the Bush era and the Obama era will have been vindicated. As Zelaya is denied his rights, the stronger Chávez and Castro become, along with President Lula of Brazil, the giant of South America. The Brazilian has said that anything short of Zelaya's restoration to office would be unthinkable.
Chávez meanwhile has sent his foreign minister Nicolas Maduro to accompany Zelaya to the Nicaraguan-Honduran border, thus clearly identifying himself with the good guy. The shots of Zelaya and Maduro at the sharp end of the conflict will have done much to counteract the careful campaign of slander and denigration of Chávez that the State Department has mounted – not without success in the US and even European media – since the failure of its own coup d'etat against the Venezuelan leader in 2002.
The longer the State Department continues to favour Micheletti over Honduras' rightful president, the more people will wonder why Obama needs enemies when he has friends like his secretary of state.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

40 Comments so far
Show All"...the more people will wonder why Obama needs enemies when he has friends like his secretary of state."
Could there be a statement any more disingenuous? Obama has all ready proven to be far more of a danger than 'lil miss Hillary could ever have hoped to be.
They are both so imperialistic and facist it is hard to pick the worse.
Meanwhile, a complete news blackout on the violence against coup opponents. The blackout is so tight that even Democracy Now only today reported this 3-day-old piece of news, the bombing of a union hall:
english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90777/90852/6711144.html
At least Chinese can follow the news over there.
It seems that each new news item about Obomber is worse than the last, especially as concerns foreign policy. And if, as some have suggested, he is the victim of loose cannons within the US military and intelligence forces, then he needs to get a firm grip on the rudder of the State and assert his authority. Otherwise he will merely prove himself to be the wishy-washy, hypocritical, two-faced puppet he appears to be.
Here's a disturbing thought: what if Obama proves to be like the kid who plays the role of a heroic character in a school drama (where the script was written by someone else, and there were lots of rehearsals before the performance and cues during), but is actually chicken in real life, not able to stand up to anyone? I'm just contrasting the campaign rhetoric and flourish with most of what he has done (or not) in the last 6 momths.
Thank you, Obama voters.
Change we can believe in.
Yes we can.
Audacity of hope.
Thank you.
Paul Newman early in his career made a very bad movie that also flopped at the box office. Later on, when it showed for a week on television, Newman ran an ad in Variety that stated: "Paul Newman apologizes every day this week." Well, Mordechai Shiblikov apologizes every day this week for his stupidity in voting for Obimbo.
Yes, however I don't blame anyone who voted for Obama, I blame the system that is rigged... (sorry to alwasy harp on this)
We can only partially blame ourselves for participating in a sham democratic process. The corrupt, unregulated, big-money, winner-takes-all electoral system is not democratic to begin with. As any comparative govt. and politics text will tell us, this type of electoral system produces only two parties. The UK has a similar problem. A corrupt system procuces corrupt results, plain and simple and we cannot expect otherwise. If the status quo prevails, we can expect more of the same in 2012 as well.
Corporations with personal legal rights, money as free speech and the corporate media monopoly distorts what is left of any vestige of democracy into a sham that produces an oligarchy - the Duopoly. As we have seen before with Bubba Clinton and now with O'Bomber the only significant differnces between the two ruling factions are more sophisticated discourse and more attractive window-dressing. The Honduras situation is a perfect example of that. The storyline is much more sophisticated this time, however we still aint buyin it.
Harp on!
A damned lot of work and expense and malignity goes in to creating the masses' blindness.
Right you are.
They push us to the wall, remove any exit and tell us it's our fault. What a fine cup of tea they make us drink.
Madame DeFarge is coming soon.
I believe the USA was directly involved in the Honduran coup. Shades of Chile and Allende. It was meant to send a message to Venezuela and Bolivia and any other Latin American nation where leftists have a chance to gain power.
Mordechai Shiblihov:
ln support of your assertion that the U.S. is treating the Honduras coup as a "lesson" for Chavez. Assistant Secretary of State Philip Crowley said at a press conference on Monday (speaking of the Honduran coup as an "episode,") and his statement has not been repudiated so far as I know:
"We certainly think that if we were choosing a model government and a model leader for countries of the region to follow, that the current leadership in Venezuela would not be a particular model. If that is the lesson that President Zelaya has learned from this episode, that would be a good lesson." http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news/4652
What makes you think Chavez is better than say Lula da Silva from Brazil?
Leftists already gained power in Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Nicaragua, and El Salvador. A communist regime has ruled Cuba for 50 years. So what's the message?
There are about fifty more island nations and a few more large countries.
Also it draws a line in the sand and sends a shot over the bow of leftist regimes.
Who said Chavez was better than Silva ? Every nation has it's own needs and thus requires unique leadership.
Glenn, I hate to wet your powder, but it seems to me Obama doesn't care if somebody like Lula da Silva (Brazil) is in charge.
The left and right ebb and flow, and this happens in Latin America as it does elsewhere. For example, the Kirchners just took a hard blow in the latest elections in Argentina, and it's likely Chile's Bachelet will be replaced by a center-right candidate (in part because the candidate of the left is seen as inept). On the other hand, I understand a leftist won the elections in El Salvador not too long ago.
I would guess the one person who does worry Obama is Chavez, because he's always sniping at the US verbally, and is cutting deals with the Iranians, Russians, and other characters the US "nomenklatura" doesn't care to see in the Western Hemisphere. I happen to be pro-Palestinian, and I love to see foreign leaders tweak the Israel lobby's nose, but Chavez does play with some very powerful dudes when he takes the Palestinians' side.
I believe Zelaya would be fine with Obama and his handlers as long as he mouths the right platitudes about Israel having the right to "defend itself" by settling the West Bank.
I also saw in the news yesterday that Colombia and Sweden have asked the Venezuelan government to investigate the delivery of Swedish built anti tank missiles to the FARC rebels in Colombia. This has raised quite a bruhaha down there.
The problem of Honduras began with the constuction of its 1982 Consititution. It was constructed by three parties: the oligarchy, military and the US Embassy (i.e. Negroponte).
It was constructed so as to allow the oligarchy to continue looting the country (as its money-making machine) while the military both guarded the oligarchy and set up its own business interests.
Things went well for some time, but then Zelayas suddenly promoted programs and policies such as: raising the minimum wage for the first time in decades (that is when the oligarchy started planning the coup), giving tractors to poor campesinos, raising the wages of public school teachers, and starting a literacy campaign to teach reading to the 20% of Hondurans that can't read.
The military got involved because Zelaya proposed add a non-binding encuesta to the vote. (An encuesta is a poll that is voted upon.) The trouble with the encuesta -which is was legal according to Honduran civil law, but suddenly made illegal by the grossly corrupt Supreme Court- was that it was going to discuss the military's immunity for past and present crimes.
Most of the today's military bosses were involved with the notorious Batallion 316...a death squad organized by the US embassy during the 1980s under the tutelage of Negroponte. The idea that their immunity might be open to democratic discussion horrified them.
After the coup took place, all of the mild reforms enacted under Zelaya were reversed while leaders of Honduras' social action groups and unions were arrested, exiled or in hiding. (Not one leader of a coup-supporter group or demonstration faced the same repression or harassment.)
And, of course, the real problem -having the average Honduran citizen discuss the structure of their oligarchy-constructed constitution- is off the table.
The problem for the US is basically the following: even though Honduras' coupsters/oligarchs are semi-educated, uncultivated, hallucitory,and stupid thugs, the US oligarchs don't really wish to go against fellow Third World oligarchs.
We must ask ourselves, how long are we going to allow the established US oligarchs in finance, insurance, banking, oil and the military-industrial complex destroy our formal democracy and our standard of living. Our government has also become their money-making machine...and it maintains and expands its reach (deregulation, privatization, bailouts, low taxes, powerful oligarchical lobbiests, and subsidies).
When an oligarchy is established, it takes all the nation's wealth; the rest of us lose it. Presently, our military is still under civilian control, we do have the past fat from our earlier economic dominance to expend, and we possess some civil liberties.
How long will it take before those "benefits" are lost and we begin to structurally turn into Honduras?
balakirev, that was informative - something you'll never see or hear on the MSM.
I'm with Alcyon. Thanks, balakirev, for your posts on this topic.
Good post, the hand of Negroponte appears again and again.
The US also thrives on the sale of software, movies, services, and sophisticated industrial equipment, as well as of course, weapons.
fdoleza
"The US also thrives"
HUH?
Past tense, pal. Even our gamed official government GDP numbers admit to a contraction. Economies in contraction are NOT thriving. If you labor under the false assumption that the USA is thriving, perhaps it is because YOU are still thriving. If so, you are in the minority. Your future is more contraction. Get used to it. We are having our asses handed to us by China. Get used to it. We are broke. Get used to it.
What's the educational level of Michiletti and Zelaya? Or the Honduras Supreme Court members' versus say Zelaya's cabinet? I suspect they're about the same.
Through the camouflage we can see clearly the workings in Washing-town forthe enrichment of elites. After the Honduran coup, Saintly O'Bamba immediately thought about how to allocate resources under his control, including "political capital", for the greatest overall enrichment of elites with "special interests" in Honduras and those with "special interests" elsewhere.
I never heard people disparage a President's name the way President Obama's has been by the hard right and hard left wings - the most I've heard was calling Nixon "Tricky Dick" and Clinton "Slick Willie", and that happened after they had been in office several years. I don't like to bring it up, but is it possible you guys are just being racists?
What, are you from the DLC? Accusing progressive critics of a the Right of Center Democratic Party (aka neo-Fascist Lite (TM)) of racism?
What a pathetic, desperate attempt. What? you can't argue on policy, so you resort to ad hom. attacks for a smokescreen. That is a tired old trick, give it a rest. Talk about hypocrisy, I thought only the Republicans did that.
Now, with that sorted, how exactly is the D Congress and D Pres different than the so-called opposition? Give me some specifics please.
Well said. It seems like these responsibility dodging folks have a wheel with all the tired arguments numbered like a ruelette. Every day they spin the wheel and throw the numbered response out here.
Obama is a flaming facist and a great wimp, race is irrelevant.
The world is quickly realizing Obama is just as criminal as Bush.
Union halls are being bombed in Honduras and people extra judicially murdered.
It's the facist Michetti government that is racist.
If that is really happening, then volunteers from the socialist militias in Venezuela and Nicaragua should immediately travel on those same paths taken by the exiled President's supporters walking out of Honduras, into Honduras to organize and defend the poor Honduran socialists from those murdering and bombing them.
You, the individual posting under the screen name "glen ford" should immediately travel to Nicaragua and cross into Honduras to help out.
Do not worry the people will feed you and you can take the weapons you will need away from those doing the murdering.
Do not wait - leave tonight. Time is short - union halls are being blown up and people being extra judicially murdered, if your reports are to be believed, "glen ford".
You too, "glen ford", can be a freedom fighter and protect those you report being blown up and extra judicially murdered.
The question, if I understand it correctly,
Is calling a white President "Tricky Dick" or another white President "Slick Willie" or a black President by his last name, Obama, evidence of racism.
The answer to that would be, not in the real world, no.
Maybe in some fantasy world where everything one does not like is racism, but not in the real world, no.
Occupants of the white house, repub or demo, have never demonstrated any regard for the democratic aspirations of the people of the handful of Central American nations.
It's a defective gene they all share.
Honduras is just another banana republic to meet the same squashed hopes as Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua, et al.
Salvadoran religious leader Archbishop Oscar Romero pleaded in a famous letter to Mr. Carter in March, 1980 to stop supporting the Salvadoran military. Two weeks later he was shot dead. Mr. Carter, of course, ignored the deceased's plea and continued pouring military hardware into the country. A few months later, Jean Donovan recognized the US helicopters buzzing over San Salvador just before her rape and murder.
Reagan funded the contras.
Bushes 1 and 2 and Clinton and Obama all support the School of Americas (www.soaw.org), the dictator's factory.
And we're encouraging democracy in the Middle East!
The author of the Guardian, UK, article is a bit behind. Or maybe he would've written the same thing even after the following news; but I believe he probably wasn't aware of this, yet.
"US Revokes Honduran Visas to Pressure Interim Regime", APF, July 29, 2009
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/07/29-5
Another bit of related news is the following, which I just came across a link for at www.WiliamBowles.info.
"Message to the International Community: There’s Separation of Powers in Honduras",
posted by Juan Carlos Hidalgo, July 27, 2009
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/07/27/message-to-the-international-community-theres-separation-of-powers-in-honduras/
QUOTE:
Roberto Michelleti, the interim president of Honduras, has an op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal that should be read by members of the international community that continue to push for the immediate restoration of Manuel Zelaya to the presidency.
Michelletti states that
“The Honduran people must have confidence that their Congress is a co-equal branch of government. They must be assured that the rule of law in Honduras applies to everyone, even their president, and that their Supreme Court’s orders will not be dismissed and swept aside by other nations as inconvenient obstacles.”
The message is clear: there’s separation of powers in Honduras, and the country’s authorities cannot simply ignore the rulings of both Congress and the Supreme Court in order to reach an agreement. The international community, which is supposedly acting on behalf of democracy, should know that.
END QUOTE
Is that what pushed the Obama administration to revoke visas? Would the Administration have revoked the visas if the above hadn't occurred? Don't ask me; I don't know.
Go to BBC World News. Download the Americas section. Afterwords, scroll down country profiles. Click Honduras. Oh my! The country is famous for its corruption, poverty, maras, and its vast inequality.
Hey. WSJ is the paper of the US oligarchs; its only right that it's a mouthpiece for the oligarchs of Honduras.
The Honduras constitution was constructed in 1982 during the waning days of Honduras
last military dictatorship. Its authors were the oligarchy, military and Negroponte of the US Embassy. Hondurans had nothing to with it.
With vast corruption comes hypocrisy. In 1985, I remember when Micheletti attempted to over ride Congress in order to undemocratically change the constitution so that his buddy could run for a second term. Nobody got bent out of shape. It was simply one member of the oligarchy trying to help out a friend.
Hey, the oligarchs were planning this coup way before the encuesta was bandied about by Zelaya. They started up when Zelaya passed Honduras' first minimum wage law in decades.
The military got envolved when Zelaya wanted to push for the encuesta; the encuesta was legal according to civil law and was made illegal by Honduras' notoriously corrupt Supreme Court.
One of the questions offered on the non-binding encuesta was whether the military should still possess immunity from the civil code. Of course, many of today's Honduran military bosses were involved in the 1980s Batallion 316 death squad. If people changed the immunity laws, these bosses wouldn't be able to comfortably visit their 19 year mistresses once a week.
So they kicked out Zelaya.
However, these oligarchs are imcomparably stupid, and they are constantly changing their rationale for the coup. They are even embarrassing the oligarchs in the US.
According to the exiled President, less than
Two, one hundredths of 1% of the people of Honduras have joined him at the border to show him how much they want him back.
That would leave 99% of the Hondurans not showing support for his return.
Or, one thousand for return - versus - 7,000,000 ( 7 million ) who either do not want him to return - or - do not care one way or the other.
Maybe if he and his supporters agree to run a candidate on the pro-Chavez socialist party ticket this November in Honduras they would get more than 1,000 votes.
Problem is - no one who openly runs for President on his current socialist philosophy will get anywhere close to a majority in Honduras.
That is why the exiled President is so desperate to prevent another free and democratic Presidential election in Honduras this November - like the one he won while running on the Liberal Party ticket four years ago.
A pro-Chavez socialist candidate will not win the Presidency in Honduras in a fair election - and the exiled President would not have won four years ago either - if he had not run on the Liberal Party ticket and hid his pro-Chavez socialist philosophy until after he was President.
Hey buddy
Zelaya and the mass democratic movement that supports him are not your enemy.
If you are an everyday schmuck like the rest of us, your enemy is the oligarchy.
In Honduras, the oligarchy are semi-educated, uncultivated, spoiled, and don't give a bee's ass about their impoverished citizens...the vast majority.
Honduras is their money-making machine; if the state is used to distribute benefits to the lower-orders, it encroaches on their system of clientalism...the oligarchs personally give individual members of the lower orders goodies. In turn, they give oligarchs political support. This personalistic system breaks down when the government actually attempts to redirect benefits to the lower orders.
Of course, the US financial, banking, insurance, oil, and military-industrial complex oligarchies don't want to step on the toes of their fellow oligarchs in Honduras. Oligarchs usually like it when each group robs their citizens blind and they usually don't mind when one group pulls a coup d'etat. However, this one is kind of embarrassing. The stupidos of Honduras can't even get their stories straight.
Presently, the oligarchs have reversed Zelaya's mild reforms, imprisoned or exiled the leaders of social groups and unions and their soldiers are busily shooting down members of the teachers' union as I write.
How come these vast human rights abuses in Honduras aren't covered in our oligarchy owned media? Iran's protest groups get plenty of coverage. Oh...did I write oligarchy owned. I guess I answered my own question.
General Romeo Velásquez, leader of the military coup in Honduras, is the latest in a long list of dictators, assassins, torturers, terrorists and coup plotters trained by the U.S. Army School of the Americas (SOA/WHINSEC).
It is past time for the U.S. to stop coaching dictators and death squads in Latin America. Demand that President Obama and your members of Congress take action to close the SOA!
http://tinyurl.com/closeSOA
Jeesh,another country someone here thinks deserves democracy.If you think liberating Iraq for a independent democracy wasn't opening a cess pool,then prepare to put bomb proof walls around your neighbor hoods here,cause these bedfellows are on the same continent.