EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- 'We Are Movement, Not a Moment': North Carolina Peaceful Uprising Continues
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- Naomi Klein: 'Anti-Shock Doctrines' Show the Way to Resist
Popular content
Today's Top News
Congress Needs to Hear From Us Today on Afghanistan
This week Congress is set to
authorize $550 billion in defense spending and, with it, an additional
$130 billion to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Despite a
Democratic President and a Democratic majority in Congress, the
military industrial complex is once again running up the score: the
House Armed Services Committee wants to shower the Pentagon with even
more federal dollars than George W. Bush ever requested. And the flood
gates of federal dollars are once again wide open for a war without end
in Afghanistan.
But there is some good news. Representative Jim McGovern (D-MA) is
trying to squeeze a bit of common sense into the bill with an amendment
that calls on the Administration to develop what President Obama told a
national television audience we need: an exit strategy from
Afghanistan. Unable to get this proposal included in the Supplemental
Defense Appropriation bill a few weeks ago, Rep. McGovern has since
introduced it as a bill that has already attracted 89 Congressional
co-sponsors. Now he intends to propose it as an amendment to the House
Armed Services Committee bill when it makes its way to the floor of the
House tomorrow.
But Rep. McGovern needs our help.
Call your Representative today at (202) 224-3121 and:
1. urge her/him to co-sponsor Rep. McGovern's Afghanistan Exit Strategy bill H.R. 2404, and
2. vote for Rep. McGovern's amendment to the Defense Authorization bill (H.R. 2647).
I realize how hard it may seem for Congressional Democrats to require
the Obama administration to develop an exit strategy as a condition for
continued funding. After all, this is our
guy, right? The last thing our guy needs is a Democratic Congress
second guessing, making demands, and putting conditions on the war.
But this is exactly what we and the administration need precisely because he is our guy.
Unlike Mr. Limbaugh, we want and need President Obama to succeed. The
very real prospect of the United States embedded in an endless war in
Afghanistan would undermine everything this administration is trying to
do while imperiling the very Congressional Democrats President Obama
needs to move his agenda.
Continuing our military presence in Afghanistan without an exit strategy is a bad idea for many reasons. As I've noted before, the presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan unites our opponents within the country and region and makes cooperation by key regional players like Iran, Russia and China
far less likely with the prospect of tens of thousands of US troops on
their border. As for those with the most at stake - Afghan people - over 80% oppose an escalation of American troops in their country.
Despite the heated rhetoric you're hearing from the right-wing echo
chamber, exit strategies are an important and useful part of military
planning. President Obama knows this, and that's why he has gone on the
record to say that we need one for the US military in Afghanistan.
The Win Without War coalition has been working closely with Congressman
McGovern and other Congressional allies on this important amendment.
Coalition member organizations have stepped up: MoveOn.org,
USAction/TrueMajority.org and Peace Action all sent alerts last week to
their membership asking them to call Members of Congress in support of
this bill. With your help today, we can easily push the number of
co-sponsors from 89 to over 100. Call your Member of Congress, ask if
she/he is a co-sponsor and if she/he intends to vote for the McGovern
amendment to the Defense Authorization bill on Wednesday. If not, why
not? And, if so, can she/he take an active role to encourage their
colleagues to support it as well.
There is not a lot of good news in the Defense Authorization bill.
Let's do something about that today before the votes are cast in
Congress tomorrow.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



13 Comments so far
Show AllSioux Rose
I will make the call, but I have small faith it will do anything. Why? As Chris Hedges recently pointed out, slow but steady steps are being made 'round the world to get off the U.S. dollar. It has been the currency used for oil transactions for decades; but if the dollar ceases to own that supreme status, then oil deals will be made (along with other trade agreements) that leave the U.S. out. Since our economy is in shambles, held up mostly by illusion and deception, our dollar is and will mean less and less.
In all probability those who orchestrated the heist on the U.S. treasury (and the public's money) to bail out banks that cheated citizens all along, or financed war, could care less about democracy, freedom, Bin Laden, or any of the other pretexts used to lure the public into support of yet another unnecessary (except to those few that profit from doom and/or "Disaster Capitalism") conflict. However, realizing the dollar was slipping away, the dark powers that direct U.S. policy (foreign and doemstic) decided to aim right for the jugular: hence war along the pipeline route. Rather than allow the Chinese or Russian economies to purchase the oil as their nations are prepared to do, the U.S. strategy is to hold a bottleneck grip on its flow. If it can't buy it, then deploying the rite of conqueror becomes the time-tested (for twisted minds) way to go.
whoever controls the silk road...
another example would be the castles along the Rhein.
I guess we aren't so different from those Somalian pirates after all.
Good points; I heartily agree.
S. Rose: I agree with Hedges as well, the transition from the dollar will be slow but sure, and has already begun. Our economy is being propped up with inflationary funny money and the largest amount of debt the world has ever seen. The Empire of Debt
Sioux Rose
SOCIALIST: "The Empire of Debt," sure has a ring to it. I hope some historian/economist picks up and runs with that title!
'Empire of Debt' is the name of a book by Bonner and Wiggins. Its a very good book, drawing parallels between the current trend in American governance (debt for bombs) and other countries throughout history. The best example they have is Italy, circa 1870 to 1940. The parallels are amazing and frightening. The Italians kept voting for politicians who would expand the debt to get reelected. And these politicians kept pointing to various threats, foreign and domestic, as a way of getting the publics mind off of the debt, until finally the country was fascist, which is the ultimate expression of this mindset. Thats the direction America is going (Obama notwithstanding), and is probably why neither Bonner and Wiggins live in America.
Yes, and the word 'debt', when indebtedness reaches those levels, is merely a euphemism for 'thievery', for at that level of debt the money owed cannot be paid back.
Indebtedness of that magnitude is a predatory strategy by means other than war, although force is always in the background.
Sioux Rose
UBREW: Okay. Sold! That book is now on my official reading list. I was thinking of something that draws parallels (at least for me), and that is the bloated salaries to the failed bankers and their illustrious staffs. I now think it's hush money, all the bonuses, etc. Not only does it provide the illusion that the banks are in a position to make these payments, (i.e. solvent) but it also keeps people on the inside who know "too much" quiet. They want to retain those salaries since they're not apt to be found anywhere else, bonuses (for failure) and all.
The link to Win Without War in the article is incorrect (at the time of this posting), try www.winwithoutwarus.org.
The MICC (add Congressional) is a runaway freight train steaming through our neighborhoods. Calling your congressperson is like throwing handfuls of straw at it to slow it down. But I'll still call, not in any way pretending that he'll listen. Who knows, one day there may be a final straw that lodges in the spokes and sets off the emergency breaking system.
It's damn sad that the best we can try for is an amendment, pleading for an exit strategy.
Afghanistan is the graveyard of empires.
All any invader has ever done is to shed blood and treasure and break their teeth.
I hope we can leave the people of Afghanistan with something better than the Taliban and Wahabism. I look into the eyes of those opressed girls and it bothers me. To leave them to the cruelty of religious fanatics is a crime.
Congress is deaf and dumb.