The Last Muscle Car
Sexy as a swollen porn star on meth, twice as useless
No? Because it appears to be a vehicle that at least some across the Big Autosphere are still secretly praying, despite the sudden overthrow of -- despite the deadly ultimatum for -- General Motors, might yet prove to be a savior.
Indeed, it's a car some hope will maybe, just maybe sell like crazy and restore a tiny bit of faith in big, thick, meaty, rather inane American cars that have no real place in the new millennium, but which for some reason they keep building anyway, presumably because aging frat boys you should never, ever date think they're totally wickedcool and will therefore be willing to shell out 35 grand to own, unless they won't.
Am I talking about the ugly-as-a-giant-vacuum-cleaner Chevy Volt? Am I aiming this admittedly overheated verbiage at the ruddy, useless Impala? No, I am not.
I am talking about the brand new, leering, pseudo-masculine 2010 Chevrolet Camaro.
What's that you say? You had no idea that Chevy was resurrecting this rolling mullet from the mausoleum of the '70s because, even after sucking up billions in bailout money, GM still doesn't really have a single fresh and forward-thinking idea, and hence the best they can do is scrape the barrel of macho nostalgia in a desperate attempt to cater to male Boomers who drink too much light beer and think Maxim is the height of masculinity and are still debating which Van Halen vocalist totally ruled?
Well, they did. And it's here. And they don't. And it's David Lee Roth (of course). And it's worth noting because, well, this wild new Camaro will very likely be the last you will ever hear of U.S. automakers vying to be a kickass, world-dominating force in automotive inspiration. It is most certainly the last gasp of that overblown, yet much-beloved myth, affectionately known as the American muscle car.
Is it time? Can we finally just say it outright, even as we risk invoking the wrath of every true-blooded American gearhead from here to 1965? Oh hell, let's just do it: Good riddance.
Yes, this is just a little bit sad. This is a moment to pause in fond remembrance. You could say it's the end of an era, but of course it's an era that should've ended about 25 years ago. Oh well.
Do not misunderstand. Muscle cars and their pony car brethren -- all those Challengers, Road Runners, Mustangs, Novas, Trans Ams, Chevelles, GTOs et al -- have a hallowed and well-deserved place in American automotive lore. Nothing, not even the full-sized SUV, exemplified the lopsided American posture better. Power over finesse, weight over grace, peel-out ability over handling, go hard over stop quick, sword over pen, meat over vegetable, trade school over college, violent death over aging gracefully.
Forget for a moment that they were, by and large, dangerous, horribly built vehicles with dreadful chassis and zero engineering integrity. Doesn't matter. They were fast. They were wide. They had huge back seats perfect for impregnating various small-town teen cheerleaders. They got eight miles to the gallon and about nine to the quart of oil. They were cool. Sort of.
Not anymore.
Behold this weird new Camaro. It is, in sum, exactly the wrong car at exactly the wrong time with exactly the wrong attitude attached to exactly the wrong hopeless hope for a return to a rather crude automotive golden era that never really existed in the first place.
Why does this car exist at all? No one seems quite sure. But it is, if you spend a moment in the various car blogs, all flavors of a dumb, guilty pleasure, hotly discussed and awaited like a giant extra-large triple-cheese quadruple-meat pizza, ever since GM introduced it as a crazy concept car back in one of those years Before All Hope Died.
Early reviews? Somewhere between lukewarm and "Holy crap, this thing sucks far, far more than it should, especially the cramped, stifling interior. And the handling. And the brakes. And the build quality." Which is, as far as America cars go, about par for the course.
But what about that mean-ass exterior? All the retro car dudes just love the new Camaro's snarling looks, which lie somewhere between a cool flaming dragon your high school stoner friend used to sketch on his Pee-Chee folders, and what a Vegas stripper plays whilst dancing around a pole. Upshot: It's just like the Corvette; another car for 10-year-old boys trapped in 45-year-old bodies.
What, too harsh? Too negative? Not really. It's mostly a criticism borne of frustration. I truly am (or rather, was) hoping for something brilliant and inspiring to come from all that American talent. I was honestly hoping one of these companies would come up with a new idea to save all those jobs (Ford is close), to resurrect the industry and prove we can be nimble and viable and revolutionary.
(Does it sound like I could be talking about my very own media/newspaper biz? The coincidence is not accidental. Similar infuriating problems plague both worlds, with solutions equally elusive).
So maybe what the 2010 Camaro really is, is a fitting death knell, a kitschy cool car that takes American automobile full circle even as it circles the drain. It's the final sign that it's time to look beyond Big Auto for any sort of true revolution or evolution, toward individuals, entrepreneurs, startups, inventors and aging hippie rock stars to solve it all for us.
Wait, what? Why sure. Have a glance, if you will, over at crusty ol' Neil Young, who loves his cars big and his grunge anthems bigger. Neil has already successfully converted his massive, two-ton '59 Lincoln Continental into a biodiesel/electric hybrid hellbeast of the future. His company is called LincVolt, and it's aiming for nothing less than the automotive X-Prize. Who says the future has to be all tiny and wimpy and Prius-y?
Or you could check in with someone like Shai Agassi, the 40-year-old Israeli entrepreneur and CEO of Better Place, a very, very well-funded startup that aims to create a definitive, international "smart" network of electric car charging/battery swapping stations, an elegant meta-grid based around some hugely forward-thinking, Earth-friendly principles. Could it work? Damn right it could. It's already underway.
Of course, if hot, futuristic car design is all you seek, if you really want inspiration and new ideas in automotive design, you skip right past American cars and look to the same place we've always looked: Europe.
Here, for but one small example, is some odd French industrial/energy conglomerate called Bolloré, who hooked in with Italian design gods Pininfarina to leapfrog right over the traditional car manufacturers and, well, create the damn revolution themselves.
Their invention: the B0, AKA the Bluecar, a tiny, gorgeous, all-electric thing that looks like a Ferrari smashed into a Smart car at the Apple Store.
The Bluecar was originally designed as a concept car, to showcase Bolloré's fuel-cell technology. But the thing came out so well, they decided to manufacture it themselves. And so they are. You can pre-order one right now.
Oh, not in the U.S., of course. We almost never get cars like this. Or more accurately, we almost never get ideas like this. What do we get? We get the Volt. We get the Camaro. We get buried.
But hey, at least we look sort of cool doing it, right?
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
19 Comments so far
Show AllI agree that we should be building more efficient, better engineered cars, if we're going to be driving at all (and we should certainly not be driving as much as we have), but it would help if the author got some of his history and concepts right. If he had, he might have learned that US fuel economy and space efficiency in cars peaked in the 80s, as automakers put good-faith effort into complying with federal fuel economy mandates, which, contrary to right-wing myth, were enthusiastically supported by the public.
An even broader myth believed these days is that US cars have always been gas guzzlers and huge. While that was certainly true overall starting in the 90s, and in the 50s and much of the 60s, compacts began to be popular in the early 60s, subcompacts in the 70s, and overall downsizing was so much the trend in the 80s that American cars got much better fuel economy than in the 90s. I don't know why, but during the 90s, the right-wing zeitgeist that Reagan set in motion during the 80s came to effect the car industry and led to those notorious SUVs, a steady increase in size for most other vehicles, and the almost complete elimination of hatchbacks from the US market, all while interior space was reduced in favor of super-reinforced bodies and over-designed, swoopy shapes.
And though the term muscle car is used these days for any US production car with a big engine from any time period, the true muscle car era extended from the early 60s through 1972, by which time public insistence on emissions laws and safety requirements was reducing their performance considerably. The Camaros and Firebirds from the second half of the 70s, which I too associate with Van Halen and high school football jocks, were not nearly as powerful as the original, much smaller Camaros and Firebirds of the late 60s, which were more sedate-looking, relatively lightweight, and quite graceful, resulting in great performance and handling. Neither those early ones nor any of the later ones had "huge back seats." They were notorious for having back seats so small that few adults could fit into them, something that was a common criticism of American sporty cars and many other US 2-door cars before the industry started getting serious about space-efficiency and fuel economy in the late 70s.
I don't say this to defend the US auto industry, only to point out common misconceptions. Because car collectors tend to be performance enthusiasts, almost the only cars that get preserved are performance models, and they were a minority of cars built, even during the muscle car era of the 60s through 1972. Muscle-car-mad car collectors have us believing that the Novas and Chevelles you mention were muscle cars, when the Nova was a very efficient, practical compact introduced in the early 60s and the Chevelle was an efficient, practical mid-size car introduced about the same time, a car that, though considered mid-size at the time, would likely be considered small by US standards of the 90s or even today.
For a start, Americans would do well to go back to the serious efforts at maximizing fuel economy and space that the industry undertook during the 80s, a time when even luxury models and sports cars were often hatchbacks and average fuel economy was better than it is today. And moving back to mass public transport would be even better.
Detroit has a Death-Wish. A Suicidal Streak.
Making Poisonous decisions, Refusing Antidotes.
Decades of Greed & Stupidity=Bankruptcy & Fingerpointing.
The Handwriting was EMBLAZONED the wall-Dynamically Blind is The Will Not To See.
A Sin! For which the sentence is Death in commerce, business, industry.
Detroit should etch a Camaro on it's Tombstone.
The author is starting to get a clue. Meanwhile most municipalities in the US have cut back on their road maintenance budgets and the great car culture continues to fall victim to the cancer that is potholes. Did a major bridge in a major city falling into the river not give us a clue?
Driving a car will be pointless when your $30K investment can be disabled by your town council being unable to find $250 to fix the pothole that breaks your axle. It doesn't matter if the car is electric if the road still has to be made out of crude oil. Car culture loses.
Who really gives a shit?
This article just angers me even more and it's nothing but a sick joke trying to hide our country's lack of creativity and innovativity. On March 31, 2009, in response to a couple of auto articles on this site (http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/03/31-12 and http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/03/31-4), I discussed about how creativity and innovative thinking was stifled by Big Auto to the point of even crushing my cousin's dreams of being able to invent his own auto and put forth a small business local market out of it. It's bad enough that American autos are so poorly manufactured and that the same Big Auto giants don't really plan on improving jack about it. I'm sorry I cost my parents dearly after I refused to buy another American made auto 3 years ago as the last one broke down in the middle of the highway due to defective manufacturing. In fact, that was the 5th time I had to do a major repair on that car !
"Would be nice to have fun and be friendly to the environment at the same time"
Its called a bicycle.
Want to see something funny? Convince a total car driver that drives a half a block to get a soft drink out of a machine to ride a bicycle for a mile and watch him/her walk when the get off the bicycle. Can't tell if their hemorrhoids have popped or if they are about to crap in their pants. Then their legs will be sore for a couple of days.
Wow, you guys sure know how to read way more into stuff then you should. Actually we walk lots of places, because we enjoy it. Being 26 its not that big of a deal to walk a couple miles to the store for a milkshake and walk back holding hands.
And again we are both very fit, she runs Marathons and I am a submission grappler so we get our 15+ hours of exercise in a week.
But from 16 to 19 I worked at a shop that overhauled imports. So it was fun working on and driving fast cars.
That's it. So I have nothing against riding a bike. We are thinking of moving to Seattle or Portland as we found these cities are better equipped for this.
So yeah, progressives, calm down just a bit would ya :)
First, YOU DON'T tell me that I 'read more into stuff than I should'.
Second, I wasn't commenting to only o rei de reis.
Third, why did YOU respond to my reply when it was about 'total car drivers'? You live somewhere special where people just get in the car and drive for the sake of burning gas or leave the engine running with the air conditioner or heater keeping you comfortable?
Forth, I am committing one of the deadly sins because I am envious of you and yours for being able to move to the northwest because where I live, people on bicycles are targets for bubba necks and religious fanatics.
Fifth, you are real close to making sounds like a conservative operative that wants to tell other what to do. See first and maybe third again.
Sixth, submission grappler? How long you been doing that and who have you studied under? I am still trying to get the basics of tai chi.
Seventh, being 60 it is still not a big deal to walk 5 miles or bike 10 miles, yet.
First. Sorry your right I was out of line to tell say that
Second. Good point looks like I read to much into that
Third. I totally agree with you. Its a bad idea to drive just because its fun, which is why I sold a 450hp fully built turbo charged car I put blood sweat and tears in because. After growing up I realized it was stupid and I was being stupid.
Fourth. Bubba necks is the funniest thing i have heard in a while :) and we haven't moved yet. We are working and saving to make it work, we hope it will! But we live in the mid west and it is way to conservative here for us. So don't show the green fangs of envy just yet.
Fifth. See first and fourth.
Sixth. Brazilian Jiu Jitsu under Jim Kelly a Pedro Sauer Black Belt, by way of Rickson Gracie.
Seventh. Congrats on 60! I mean no disrespect at all by saying I was 26. It's just most of the other people my age, minus those I train with, would die if they had to walk 5 miles. So to be wise and healthy as you appear to be, is a goal of mine.
Cheers
O Rei
Sixth, I remember the first time watching I guess the Ultimate Fighting Championship when Royce Gracie submitted Dan Severns in 15 minutes of combat, truly impressive considering my idea someone that small could take someone so big and experienced.
Seventh, I didn't think of disrespect, as you impressed me with you and yours' conscienousness about health as I do see far too many couch potatoes who think mass(mostly fat) means healthy or that being 100 or 100+ lb overweight is natural. As a matter of fact, I like the idea of being as 'fit' as I am at my age compared to those hogs.
Fourth, hope you do get to the northwest, I would love to live out there or close to big bodies of water for touring kayaking.
toucha
deleted by author
Someone tell Morford that the Camaro, in particular, has always been a "chick car". Substitute "new Ford Mustang" which has been in production a couple years now and the article makes more sense. The Ford Mustang -- yet Morford claims, "I was honestly hoping one of these companies would come up with a new idea to save all those jobs (Ford is close), to resurrect the industry and prove we can be nimble and viable and revolutionary." How about that Mustang, Mark?
The future lies in hydrogen fuel cell technology employing pollution free solar electric powered hydrolysis plants to produce hydrogen (with oxygen as the only "waste" product), for use in fuel cells that produce electricity and hot water, solving problems of energy and clean water shortages. Fuel cells can be used to power vehicles, factories and homes. All of this could have been put in place by now had we begun a decade ago, spending a few trillion dollars to do it instead of spending the same amount to kill a million innocent people half way around the world. And, it would have created millions of jobs to put it in place and maintain it. Just a matter of priorities I suppose.
Its hard to go along with this, because I have always been a big fan of cars, I love to work on them, and I love to drive. So even though I get the point. Hopefully they will makes some nice fun to drive electric cars like the Tesla. Would be nice to have fun and be friendly to the environment at the same time :)
Teslas cost six figures...Can I borrow yours?
You can have lots of fun and get great milage, just get a motorcycle.
The author is a fool.
Actually he is not but you couldnt tell from this confused and confusing drivel.....
Besides the Hemi Charger is far more powerful and larger as well, and ,I believe, still ranks as the worst gas mileage extant today.
The author should take the time to note the difference between fuel cell technology and plug-in style electric powered cars. Big difference.
Also shoulda left this one: "trade school over college" off his shit list. Give me a guy with a trade over a guy with a degree any time. Especially from an Ivy league college.