Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
GMO: A Technology of Agri-business
Claire Hope Cummings is making bold statements. She says there is a technology that is violating the laws of nature and evolution. She says it is causing farmers in India to commit suicide, and claims this technology has been developed purposefully as a tool for social control. She says it is also being used by the largest employer on Molokai.
What is this technology? Genetically modified organisms, or GMOs for short.
Genetic modification allows for the development of traits many farmers and large-scale growers believe is helpful for production. "Roundup Ready" soybeans, for example, have been altered to be resistant to the herbicide Roundup. BT corn has been developed to contain its own insecticide by adding a gene coming from the bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis.
Cummings is a journalist, activist, and former environmental lawyer of 20 years. She is also author of Uncertain Peril: Genetic Engineering and the Future of Seeds, a book that has been compared to Rachel Caron's Silent Spring.
Last Wednesday, Cummings visited Molokai to talk to community members about the technology and impacts of GMOs. Soybeans and corn are the two major crops affected by genetic modification, she says. GMOs are grown on Molokai, as well as communities around the world.
The process of creating a GMO, says Cummings, involves cutting the DNA of an organism, plant or animal, and forcing molecules upon it which will alter its make-up, severing the evolutionary development of the organism. "They talk about a product; I talk about a process," says Cummings. She describes the process as the "matrix of control": control of nature's processes, control of the political climate, and thus, control of economics.
The problem many people have with GMOs goes far beyond any moral or scientific dilemmas.
Cummings points out that because it is a patented technology and ownership is a key player in the GMO field, violations are bound to occur. Many of these violations are unintentional, over which violators have no control. Contamination of non-GMO crops through pollen being blown by the wind is common. Violators found to have the GMO gene in their crop are often sued by the company owning the patent to the technology, says Cummings.
California is the only state to have bans on GMOs in some counties, and has recently passed a law protecting farmers from being sued if their crops are contaminated, Cummings adds. Farmers in India have been known to commit suicide because they could not pay the royalties owed to patent owners after the farmers were sued for contamination.
After the meeting, the audience was encouraged to spread information about GMOs by word of mouth. Resident Carla Hanchett reminded the community, however, that Monsanto is Molokai's biggest employer and is a sensitive subject for many people to discuss, even with friends.
The company has had a positive impact on the lives of many Molokai residents, and has no documented safety or environmental violations on the island. "Monsanto provides our local non-profits with thousands of dollars in grants and have generally been a good neighbor," says Dispatch Editor Todd Yamashita.
Cummings has five main reasons she believes using the technology of genetic modification is detrimental to a sustainable and healthy world.
First, Cummings calls the use of GMOs "bad farming." "Think chemicals when you see GMOs," she says. The process, Cummings adds, destroys nature and the integrity of plants and plant systems. In addition, plants modified by genetic engineering do not give back as much to farmers and consumers as non-GMO species. "GMO plants are 10-15% less productive than non-GMOs, and the food they produce is less nutritious," says Cummings.
Bad economics is the second reason Cummings gives against the use of GMOs. "This technology grows on chemicals and green manure," says Cummings. She adds that more than $26 billion annually goes to fund the business of genetic modification. "It causes the economics of scarcity," Cummings says. GMOs place the abundance of nature up against the economics of owning and selling that is a key aspect of the GMO industry.
"We've taken the culture out of agriculture," Cummings says. "Now all we have left is agri-business."
"It's also bad social policy," she explains. "Patents are the life blood of this technology of ownership." The judge that legalized plant patenting, Clarence Thomas, was a former corporate lawyer for Monsanto. Under Reagan's presidency, the use of GMOs became unregulated, says Cummings.
Bad biology is another reason Cummings argues against GMOs. "Altering living, growing systems is just messing with us and the natural world," she says. The contamination rate is also very high, she notes: conventional corn is 80% contaminated by neighboring GMO crops. "The sugar cane that used to be on this island had human genes," Cummings told the audience.
Bad science is the fifth point Cummings brought to the table. Back when GMOs were being developed, science was "primitive," she says. "Now they know DNA is not the secret of life. It's more like RNA."
"It's a technology solely controlled by corporations." Cummings says. "Just because they get it to work, doesn't mean it's good."
"The story of seeds is our story," she adds. "What we do to seeds is what we do to ourselves, and the future of seeds is in our hands."



8 Comments so far
Show AllFirst it was land privatization and now it is bad GMOs that will be wiping out farmers in India and just about every Asian continent to be exact. Without farmers, the population goes kaput. Agri-business gone haywire has already killed the USA. If prices keep going up in China and India, outsourcing will be harder for the USA to continue. It's time for the American people to unite and stand up for going local. A good global market starts locally and builds up from there.
Monsanto gives to non-profits as a PR move. if you wanted to find the devil, you wouldn't have to look very far.
GMOS and the livestock industries(both small farms and factory ones). Two biggest threats to food.
Human supremacy myth(whether theist based or secular) coupled with science.
Bad recipe.
We are a small intentional community, we call ourselves "Organic Freedom Farm". The issue over GMO's and hybrid seed is something we take very serious. For 10,000 years farmers have been seed saving to provide themselves with the means to give their family and community food.
Recently we viewed a movie on the internet about Monsanto and their GMO seed. It was very disturbing how they can go to a farm anywhere in this country and sue someone for patent infringement and/or theft because of accidental cross-pollination. The look on the face of the farmers who were financialy ruined because of losing those law suits against Monsanto was disheartening.
Why can't we protect farmers, the people who feed us. Legislation needs to be in our favor, not multi-billion dollar corporations who can buy their way into or out of anything.
Where to start on this one? First off, a simple journal search will show that glyphosate (RoundUp) is dangerous to human health, nitrogen-fixing bacteria, earthworms, mycorrhizal fungi, amphibians, birds, and I'm sure I'm forgetting a few there.
As for the safety of the GM crops themselves, who knows? There has never been any long term testing on humans and there are a few animal studies showing harmful effects - most noticably one Monsanto did itself (though refused to show the raw data for). And what is the material need for this technology? We already know how to drastically increase yields (something GMOs cannot do, by the way), and that is to reduce farm size.
GMOs are the worst idea since libertarianism.
This documentary tells you what GMOs really are and what extreme risk they mean to the environment:
http://video.google.de/videosearch?q=monsanto+mit+gift+und+genen&emb=0&aq=f#
(don´t be confused- at the beginning you year French and see German subtitles because it is a co-production between French and German TV) but the language of the video is English
If you are interested to find out what GE really is (no precise "technology" but more "trial and error), pls read on:
Genetic engineering is based on a FALSE mechanistic view of biology: cells are not machines although many cellular processes seem to be quasi automatic. A German scientist has described the hubris of biotechnology by comparing it to someone "who has just learned the alphabet and is now going to change letters in a book (with thousands of pages) he does not understand...."
Genes are NOT independent carriers of information, they do NOT operate in isolation: On the contrary, they are part of a huge communication NETWORK that includes the whole cell, the whole organism and the environment. They interact in a complicated way, changing their behaviour in response to influences from other genes.
This “fluid genome” is controlled by a highly sophisticated regulatory system which can provide hyper-variability (i.e. when bacteria are more and more attacked with anti-biotics their genes hyper-mutate and sooner or later anti-biotic resistance will occur) or stability for genes or genomes as required. There are also numerous biochemical mechanisms for changing and reorganizing DNA through natural “GE”, like cutting and splicing of DNA molecules into new sequence arrangements.
This also involves mobile genetic elements which can move from one position to another, enabling organisms to RESPOND to environmental challenges. (Mutations are therefore not at all “random” but directed) N.B. If you change one gene, you CHANGE THE RELATIONSHIP OF ALL GENES TO EACH OTHER - a fact the proponents of biotechnology do not understand (or rather do not want to see)
The function of only a small proportion of the DNA in a higher organism is known. Although a gene can be cut out precisely from the DNA of an organism, its insertion into the DNA of another organism is ENTIRELY RANDOM. This results in the DISRUPTION of the ORDER of the genes on the chromosome and may result in random and unexpected changes in the functioning of the cells.
The random insertion of foreign genes into the genetic material may cause unexpected changes in the functioning of other genes. Existing molecules may be manufactured in incorrect quantities, at the wrong times, or new molecules may be produced. GE foods and food products may therefore contain unexpected toxins or allergenic molecules that could harm our health.
Genetically engineered food has NOT improved nutritional value.On the contrary: research has shown that organic food (remember before the advent of agrichemicals all farming was kind of "organic")has for example higher levels of protein (wheat), vitamins, minerals, or Omega 3-fatty acids (organic milk or milk from free-range cows, feeding on glover and other wild herbs)
The all important thing is soil-fertility:not squeezing the life out of the soil with toxic pesticides, artificial fertilizers,monocultures and bt-toxins.... (1 teaspoonful of healthy soil contains more than 5 billion living organisms)
In the US GE ingredients are not labelled, so there is no way of knowing whether we are eating them and if there are any health problems no-one could trace them back to GE food.
Seeds of genetically engineered crops are MORE EXPENSIVE than those of conventional crops. Farmers in the UK and USA report that yields are generally no better, the crops are less reliable and overall have not improved profitability.
Crops engineered to be resistant to specific herbicides may encourage more liberal use of those herbicides. This has been anticipated by one manufacturer, who has applied to the regulating authority) to have the allowable RESIDUE of the herbicide glyphosate (Roundup®) in foods sold in New Zealand increased by 200 TIMES. In areas of the USA where crops engineered to produce their own insecticide are grown, pesticide use has not decreased. And why should it? Most crops have a diversity of insect pests, so repelling just one pest (at the expense of other beneficial insects, e.g. natural enemies of the pest might be starved) will not protect the plant and in the long run resistance to the endotoxin will emerge as it always does....
Insects, birds and the wind carry genetically altered pollen and seeds into neighbouring fields and far beyond. Cross-pollination occurs between GE crops and non-GE crops and their wild relatives. In this way resistance to weed killer, for example, might be transmitted to weeds making them more difficult to control. (This has happened in Canada) There is evidence that crops engineered to produce their own insecticide can kill beneficial insects.
GMOs - a weapon against starvation? The major cause of famine is the organization of global production and distribution of food which is controlled by a handful of corporations like Nestlé, Kraft Foods, Unilever, etc. Food mountains exist in much of the western world and food is regularly dumped. Poor people have limited ability to buy either GE or non-GE food. There is no evidence that GE crops produce higher yields than conventional crops.
In India more than a hundred thousand farmers have committed suicide when crop failure and rising costs increased their debts so much that they saw no other way out....
http://www.celsias.com/article/monsantos-bt-cotton-indian-cotton-farmers-commit-s/
The corporations behind this (who also brought you things like Agent Orange) will stop at nothing to mislead the public and push their agenda to gain control of agriculture
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Monsanto_and_the_Campaign_to_Undermine_Organics
Spineless and ignorant politicians have supported the "breakthrough" of a technology whose long term consequences may be disastrous (because of genomic instability of transgenic plants)
For more scientific information go to: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/princeCharlesGMfood.php
Sorry, I gave the wrong link (German version of the video) this is the correct one:
http://video.google.de/videosearch?q=monsanto+documentary&emb=0&aq=0&oq=monsanto+#
With reference to my earlier posts - I beg your pardon:
There are several videos on google about this but many are just 10 minute clips, if you want to see the whole GMO documentary pls go to:
http://video.google.de/videosearch?q=controlling+our+food&emb=0&aq=f#